Skip to content

A Study to Evaluate the Safety and Effectiveness of Mirodenafil in Korean Patients With Erectile Dysfunction

Post-Marketing Surveillance of Bravonto in Korea

Status
Terminated
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01802359
Enrollment
379
Registered
2013-03-01
Start date
2011-11-07
Completion date
2012-05-31
Last updated
2017-06-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Erectile Dysfunction

Keywords

Erectile dysfunction, Mirodenafil, Bravonto

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of mirodenafil in participants with erectile dysfunction.

Detailed description

This is a non randomized (the study medication is not assigned by chance), open-label (all participants and study staff know the identity of the treatment), multi-center, prospective (looking forward using observations collected following participant enrollment), and non-comparative study in which participants with erectile dysfunction will be observed to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of mirodenafil for 12 weeks. Safety evaluations will include assessment of adverse events, and record of concomitant medications. The study will be conducted in Korea.

Interventions

DRUGNo intervention

This is an observational study. Korean male participants receiving mirodenafil as per the prescribing information will be observed.

Sponsors

Janssen Korea, Ltd., Korea
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
MALE
Age
19 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Participants diagnosed with erectile dysfunction * Participants prescribed mirodenafil on demand

Exclusion criteria

\- Participants who have administered mirodenafil for other than an approved indication

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Number of participants with adverse eventsUp to 4 weeks

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
International Index of Erectile FunctionBaseline (Week 0), Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12The International Index of Erectile Function is used for the assessment of erectile dysfunction, with scores ranging from 0 to 30. Evaluation of points are as follows: 1-10 = severe erectile dysfunction, 11-16 = moderate dysfunction, 17-21 = mild to moderate dysfunction, 22-25 = mild dysfunction, 26-30 = no dysfunction. Lower scores indicate worsening.
Sexual Encounter ProfileBaseline (Week 0), Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12The Sexual Encounter Profile is assessed after each sexual attempt consisting of a series of yes/no questions regarding specific aspects of each encounter. Question 1 asks, Were you able to insert your penis into your partner's vagina? and question 2 asks, Did your erection last long enough for you to complete intercourse with ejaculation?.
Global assessment QuestionnaireBaseline (Week 0), Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12The Global Assessment Questionnaire is a self-administered questionnaire (Yes/No) that allows men to rate improvement in erectile function. Question 1 asks Has the treatment you have been taking over the past 4 weeks improved your erections? and if the answer is yes, question 2 then asks Has the treatment improved your ability to engage in sexual activity
Number of participants with adverse eventsUp to 12 weeks

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026