Skip to content

Emla-Cream as Pain Relief During Pneumococcal Vaccination

Emla-Cream as Pain Relief During Pneumococcal Vaccination

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01802086
Enrollment
72
Registered
2013-03-01
Start date
2013-05-31
Completion date
2015-11-30
Last updated
2025-10-23

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Children, Pain

Keywords

Children, Pain, Vaccination, Emla, Pneumococcal, Pain scale

Brief summary

The aim of this intervention study is to compare the efficacy of Emla cream as a pain relief or no pain relief in connection to the first pneumococcal vaccination at the age of three months in Child health care. Primary objective 1.Leads Emla cream as pain relief to children in connection with pneumococcal vaccination at the age of three months to lower pain scores in the use of five items; Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability (FLACC scale) as a pain measurement instrument?

Detailed description

The aim of this intervention study is to compare the efficacy of Emla cream as a pain relief or no pain relief in connection to the first pneumococcal vaccination at the age of three months in Child health care. Primary objective 1. Leads Emla cream as pain relief to children in connection with pneumococcal vaccination at the age of three months to lower pain scores in the use of FLACC scale as a pain measurement instrument? Secondary objectives 2. Leads Emla cream as pain relief in connection with pneumococcal vaccination to any difference in the child's heart rate response and saturation? 3. Leads Emla cream as pain relief that it takes longer before the baby starts crying and does the child cry for a shorter time in connection with vaccination? Method: The study is randomised and singleblind. The study involves 72 children who are 3 months old. 36 children will receive Emla-cream and 36 children will receive placebo-cream. This study will lead to new knowledge about Emla cream and pneumococcal vaccination. The study will give new knowledge how painful pneumococcal vaccination is for the children. If the study shows that Emla cream don´t give enough pain relief during pneumococcal vaccination more studies should be done with other pain relief.

Interventions

DRUGEmla-cream

Topical anaesthetic

DRUGMiniderm cream

Topical

Sponsors

Beatrice Olsson Duse
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
SINGLE (Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
2 Months to 4 Months
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Healthy children, born vaginally or by cesarean section after 37 weeks of gestation, who were not admitted to the neonatal unit. Children should only have been with the newborn screening performed routinely at the hospital.

Exclusion criteria

* Baby delivered by vacuum extraction or forceps. Children born before gestational week 37. Children in neonatal care and subjected to other testing than newborn screening. Shoulder dystocia. Children susceptible to methaemoglobinaemia in glucose 6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency, congenital or idiopathic methemoglobinemia. Children with atopic dermatitis.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Measuring the Effect of Emla Cream on Pain Perception During Pneumococcal Vaccination Measured With Five Items; Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability (FLACC Scale).Before vaccination and after vaccination, up to three minutes.The effect of Emla cream on pain perception during pneumococcal vaccination was measured by FLACC scale that includes five items; Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability. FLACC scale i a qualitative behavioural scale used for pain assesment and has been validated for use in infants aged 2 months to 7 years. Each item (Face, Legs, Activity, Cry and Consolability) can give 0,1 or 2 points according to the description included in the FLACC scale. The total summarised pain score can range between 0-10 points. A higher pain-score indicate more pain, which means a worse outcome. FLACC scale was measured before and after vaccination and compared between the groups (Emla-cream vs Miniderm cream).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Pain Perception Measured With Latency Time to Cry and Total Crying Time.Before vaccination and after vaccination, up to three minutes.Latency time to cry (scored in seconds): * how long does it takes until the baby starts to cry after vaccination was performed (the longer it takes until the baby starts to cry indicate less pain, a better outcome). Min- or maximum values is not applicable. Total crying time (scored in seconds): * how long time is the baby crying after vaccination was performed (the longer time the baby is crying indicate more pain, a worse outcome). Min- or maximum values is not applicable.
Heart Rate (Beats Per Minute) Before and After VaccinationBefore vaccination and after vaccination, up to three minutesHeart rate before and after vaccination (beats per minute), higher values indicate more pain, a worse outcome. Min and max values are not applicable.
Saturation Before and After Vaccination.Before vaccination and after vaccination, up to three minutesOxygen saturation before and after vaccination (0-100%), a lower value indicate more pain, a worse outcome

Countries

Sweden

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Emla-cream
Dose: 1 g Emla-cream, 1 hour. Emla-cream: Topical anaesthetic
36
Miniderm Cream
Dose: 1 g Miniderm-cream, 1 hour. Miniderm cream: Topical
36
Total72

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicEmla-creamMiniderm CreamTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
36 Participants36 Participants72 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
23 Participants17 Participants40 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
13 Participants19 Participants32 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 360 / 36
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 360 / 36
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 360 / 36

Outcome results

Primary

Measuring the Effect of Emla Cream on Pain Perception During Pneumococcal Vaccination Measured With Five Items; Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability (FLACC Scale).

The effect of Emla cream on pain perception during pneumococcal vaccination was measured by FLACC scale that includes five items; Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability. FLACC scale i a qualitative behavioural scale used for pain assesment and has been validated for use in infants aged 2 months to 7 years. Each item (Face, Legs, Activity, Cry and Consolability) can give 0,1 or 2 points according to the description included in the FLACC scale. The total summarised pain score can range between 0-10 points. A higher pain-score indicate more pain, which means a worse outcome. FLACC scale was measured before and after vaccination and compared between the groups (Emla-cream vs Miniderm cream).

Time frame: Before vaccination and after vaccination, up to three minutes.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Emla-creamMeasuring the Effect of Emla Cream on Pain Perception During Pneumococcal Vaccination Measured With Five Items; Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability (FLACC Scale).FLACC score before vaccination0 score on a scale
Emla-creamMeasuring the Effect of Emla Cream on Pain Perception During Pneumococcal Vaccination Measured With Five Items; Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability (FLACC Scale).FLACC score after vaccination7 score on a scale
Miniderm CreamMeasuring the Effect of Emla Cream on Pain Perception During Pneumococcal Vaccination Measured With Five Items; Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability (FLACC Scale).FLACC score before vaccination0 score on a scale
Miniderm CreamMeasuring the Effect of Emla Cream on Pain Perception During Pneumococcal Vaccination Measured With Five Items; Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability (FLACC Scale).FLACC score after vaccination9 score on a scale
Secondary

Heart Rate (Beats Per Minute) Before and After Vaccination

Heart rate before and after vaccination (beats per minute), higher values indicate more pain, a worse outcome. Min and max values are not applicable.

Time frame: Before vaccination and after vaccination, up to three minutes

Population: We analysed the babies heart rate (beats per minute) before and after vaccination.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Emla-creamHeart Rate (Beats Per Minute) Before and After VaccinationBeats per minute before vaccination148.31 beats per minuteStandard Deviation 17.33
Emla-creamHeart Rate (Beats Per Minute) Before and After VaccinationBeats per minute after vaccination159.59 beats per minuteStandard Deviation 15.53
Miniderm CreamHeart Rate (Beats Per Minute) Before and After VaccinationBeats per minute before vaccination147.93 beats per minuteStandard Deviation 17.95
Miniderm CreamHeart Rate (Beats Per Minute) Before and After VaccinationBeats per minute after vaccination160.46 beats per minuteStandard Deviation 17.36
Secondary

Pain Perception Measured With Latency Time to Cry and Total Crying Time.

Latency time to cry (scored in seconds): * how long does it takes until the baby starts to cry after vaccination was performed (the longer it takes until the baby starts to cry indicate less pain, a better outcome). Min- or maximum values is not applicable. Total crying time (scored in seconds): * how long time is the baby crying after vaccination was performed (the longer time the baby is crying indicate more pain, a worse outcome). Min- or maximum values is not applicable.

Time frame: Before vaccination and after vaccination, up to three minutes.

Population: We analysed for how long time it takes until the baby starts to cry and for how long time the baby is crying.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Emla-creamPain Perception Measured With Latency Time to Cry and Total Crying Time.Latency time to cry (seconds)2.77 Time in secondsStandard Deviation 0.8
Emla-creamPain Perception Measured With Latency Time to Cry and Total Crying Time.Total crying time (seconds)78.74 Time in secondsStandard Deviation 45.866
Miniderm CreamPain Perception Measured With Latency Time to Cry and Total Crying Time.Latency time to cry (seconds)2.05 Time in secondsStandard Deviation 0.978
Miniderm CreamPain Perception Measured With Latency Time to Cry and Total Crying Time.Total crying time (seconds)100.44 Time in secondsStandard Deviation 73.307
Secondary

Saturation Before and After Vaccination.

Oxygen saturation before and after vaccination (0-100%), a lower value indicate more pain, a worse outcome

Time frame: Before vaccination and after vaccination, up to three minutes

Population: We analysed the babies oxygen saturation before and after vaccination.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Emla-creamSaturation Before and After Vaccination.Before vaccination99.59 percentage of oxygen saturationStandard Deviation 0.82
Emla-creamSaturation Before and After Vaccination.After vaccination98.86 percentage of oxygen saturationStandard Deviation 1.22
Miniderm CreamSaturation Before and After Vaccination.Before vaccination99.78 percentage of oxygen saturationStandard Deviation 0.43
Miniderm CreamSaturation Before and After Vaccination.After vaccination98.76 percentage of oxygen saturationStandard Deviation 2.06

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026