Skip to content

Artificial Tears Versus Preservative Free Ketorolac Trometamol 0.45% for Acute Viral Conjunctivitis

Artificial Tears Versus Preservative Free Ketorolac Trometamol 0.45% for Treatment of Acute Viral Conjunctivitis

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01799863
Enrollment
50
Registered
2013-02-27
Start date
2012-06-30
Completion date
2013-03-31
Last updated
2015-04-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Conjunctivitis, Viral

Keywords

Conjunctivitis, Viral, Ketorolac, Artificial tears

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the evolution of the symptoms of acute viral conjunctivitis using preservative free ketorolac trometamol 0.45% associated with carboxymethylcellulose compared with isolated use of preservative-free artificial tears.

Detailed description

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the evolution of the symptoms of acute viral conjunctivitis using preservative free ketorolac trometamol 0.45% associated with carboxymethylcellulose compared with isolated use of preservative-free artificial tears. A randomized double-masked study will include 60 patients divided into two groups: Group 1: using a formulation of ketorolac tromethamine 0.45% associated with carboxymethylcellulose (Acular CMC®, Allergan, Irvine, USA) and Group 0: using artificial tears (Optive UD®, Allergan, Irvine, USA), both drugs without preservatives.

Interventions

DRUGKetorolac trometamol 0.45% with carboxymethylcellulose

Sponsors

Fundação Altino Ventura
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Acute conjunctivitis (unilateral or bilateral) for less than two weeks, * Signs and symptoms consistent with viral conjunctivitis and at least one of the following: preauricular lymphadenopathy, upper tract respiratory infection or recent contact with someone with conjunctivitis

Exclusion criteria

* pregnant women * allergies to non-steroidal anti-inflammatories * history of seasonal allergic conjunctivitis * contact lens wearers * history of ocular herpes infection * blepharitis * severe dry eye * purulent discharge * defects in the corneal epithelium

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in ocular symptoms from baseline to treatment day 77 daysGeneral ocular discomfort, itching, foreign body sensation, tearing, eye redness and eyelid edema. Symptoms will be graded as 0 (absence), I (mild), II (moderate) and III (severe).
Change in ocular signs from baseline to treatment day 77 daysThe clinical examination will consist of slit-lamp examination of the anterior segment. Four signs will be assessed: conjunctival hyperemia, chemosis, secretion and follicles in lower tarsal conjunctiva. The signs will be classified as 0 (absence), I (mild), II (moderate), III (severe)

Countries

Brazil

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026