Skip to content

Impact of Septal Vs Apical Pacing on Right and Left Ventricular Performance

Impact of Septal Vs Apical Pacing on Right and Left Ventricular Performance

Status
Terminated
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01798043
Enrollment
29
Registered
2013-02-25
Start date
2013-01-31
Completion date
2016-01-31
Last updated
2020-07-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Atrioventricular Block, Heart Block, Sick Sinus Syndrome, Ventricular Dysfunction

Brief summary

The study aims to use cardiac MRI scans and analysis techniques to evaluate differences in cardiac function after 12 months of pacing in patients with pacing leads placed in different positions within the right ventricle (apically or septally).

Detailed description

Prolonged pacing from the right ventricular (RV) Apex has been shown to be associated with progressive left ventricular (LV) dysfunction. This has led to an interest in alternative right ventricular pacing sites. Only very few studies investigated the effect of alternative right ventricular pacing sites using three dimensional imaging. Using cardiac MRI volumetric left- and right ventricular analysis and three-dimensional reconstruction is more accurate compared to trans-thoracic echocardiogram. St. Jude Medical has developed a MRI conditional pacemaker system enabling for the first time to investigate alternative pacing sites using cardiac MRI. Patients already implanted with an MRI conditional pacemaker system from St. Jude Medical will be enrolled in that study and subdivided into 4 groups (right ventricular pacing lead positioned apically or septally subdivided in patients paced for \<50% of time or 50% or more). All patients will undergo cardiac MRI at enrollment and again 12 months later. Patients paced \<50% of the time will undergo cardiac MRI with and without pacemaker stimulation at both visits.

Interventions

OTHERCardiac MRI with pacemaker stimulation

Patient is undergoing a Cardiac MRI at enrollment and 12 months later

OTHERCardiac MRI with and without pacemaker stimulation

Patient is undergoing a Cardiac MRI at enrollment and 12 months later

Sponsors

Abbott Medical Devices
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Have been implanted with an Accent MRI pacemaker and Tendril MRI leads. * Have an RV lead implanted apically (group A) or septally (Group B) * Are RV paced for \<50% of the time (groups A2 and B2) * Are RV paced for \> 50% of the time (Groups A1 and B1) * Are ≥ 18 years of age. * Are able to provide written informed consent. * Are willing and able to comply with the prescribed follow-up tests and schedule of evaluations.

Exclusion criteria

* Have permanent atrial fibrillation with preserved intrinsic conduction * Have a non-MRI compatible device or material implant (e.g., intracranial aneurysm clip, non-MRI compatible devices or material, metals or alloys, etc.). * Have a lead extender, plug or adaptor. * Do not have an RV lead implanted apically or septally. * Are eligible for groups A1 or B1 but appropriate group already has 20 patients enrolled. * Are eligible for groups A2 or B2 but appropriate group already has 5 patients enrolled * Are currently participating in another device or drug investigation which includes an active treatment arm. * Are pregnant or planning to become pregnant during the duration of the study. * Have a life expectancy of less than 12 months from Screening due to any life-threatening condition. * Are contraindicated for an MRI scan due to any other reason.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Change in LV chamber volumes.12 months (baseline to end of study)

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Change in Dyssynchrony12 months
Change in Ejection fraction12 months
Change in Strain rate12 months

Countries

Switzerland

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026