Skip to content

Intramedullary Nailing of Tibia Fractures

Intramedullary Nailing of Tibia Fractures in the Presence of Medial or Posterior Malleolar Fractures

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01797640
Enrollment
90
Registered
2013-02-22
Start date
2012-10-31
Completion date
2015-04-30
Last updated
2015-07-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Malleolar Fractures, Tibial Fractures

Keywords

Tibia Fractures, Medial Fractures, Posterior Malleolar Fractures

Brief summary

Currently, the treatment of choice for tibial fracture is intramedullary nailing. This procedure has been shown to have low rates of infection, high rates of bone healing, and a faster return to weight bearing and activity in comparison to conservative treatment. In concurrent fractures of the posterior or medial malleolus and the tibia, it is now common to identify, reduce, and fix the malleolar fracture prior to intramedullary nailing of the tibia. In this retrospective study, our aim is to establish that reducing malleolar fractures prior to tibial nailing is a safe treatment in which the reduction of the malleolus is maintained intraoperatively, postoperatively, and remains reduced until the fracture has healed.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

University of Utah
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
RETROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 95 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* All patients, 18+ years of age, that have been treated at the University of Utah over the past five years for tibial fracture combined with medial or posterior malleolar fracture.

Exclusion criteria

* None

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Malleolar involvement in tibial fracture6 Week Post-OpCurrently the treatment of choice for tibial fracture is intramedullary nailing. This procedure has been shown to have low rates of infection, high rates of bone healing, and a faster return to weight bearing and activity in comparison to conservative treatment.

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026