Skip to content

Hippocampal Prophylactic Cranial Irradiation for Small Cell Lung Cancer

A Phase II Trial of Hippocampal-Sparing Cranial Irradiation (PCI) for Small-Cell Lung Cancer (SCLC)

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01797159
Enrollment
20
Registered
2013-02-22
Start date
2013-03-11
Completion date
2019-03-18
Last updated
2021-10-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

SCLC, Small-cell Lung Cancer, Small Cell Lung Cancer Limited Stage

Keywords

Prophylactic Cranial Irradiation, PCI, Hippocampal-sparing irradiation

Brief summary

The Investigators are looking to compare standard treatment for the management of small cell lung cancer (SCLC) which is prophylactic cranial Irradiation (PCI) (shown to be very good in patient survival) with cranial sparing PCI. Although standard of care PCI is successful in patient survival it also has neurologic side-effects. The Investigators are hoping the cranial sparing PCI has the same positive survival results with the added benefit of lowering neurological side-effects.

Detailed description

The standard of care in management of small cell lung cancer consists of chemotherapy plus thoracic radiation followed by prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) based on a randomized trial that demonstrated a significant improvement in overall survival (OS) with PCI. Unfortunately radiation therapy to the brain is associated with neurocognitive toxicity, which may be at least in part related to radiation induced injury to neural progenitor cells in the hippocampus. Both human and animal data suggest an inverse relationship between radiation dose to the hippocampus and performance on neuropsychological testing. We hypothesize that hippocampal sparing PCI will allow improved performance on tests of short term memory and executive function compared to a historical control (RTOG 0212) receiving the same dose of conventional PCI. The primary objective of this study is to evaluate performance on the Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised for delayed recall at 6 months following hippocampal-sparing PCI relative to the historical control. Secondary objectives are to estimate: 1) composite cognitive function following hippocampal-sparing PCI relative to the historical control and 2) the rate of metastases in the hippocampus at 2 years following hippocampal-sparing PCI. The long term goal of this research is to reduce the long term sequelae of radiation therapy for both primary and metastatic brain tumors.

Interventions

RADIATIONHippocampal-sparing Prophylactic Cranial Irradiation

Hippocampal-sparing Prophylactic Cranial Irradiation

Sponsors

Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 100 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patient must have newly diagnosed and confirmed small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) * Patient must have a performance status of 1 or higher * Patients must not have received previous irradiation to the brain * Patients must have limited stage disease with complete response to chemotherapy and consolidative chest radiotherapy that was documented at least on standard chest x-rays within one month of study entry * Negative MRI or CT scan of the brain at least one month before protocol entry * Women of child-bearing potential must have a negative pregnancy test and also agree to use adequate contraceptives while on protocol * Patient must be able to understand and sign the informed consent document * Patient must be informed of the investigational aspect to this trial prior to singing the informed consent document

Exclusion criteria

* Patients receiving prior external beam irradiation to the head or neck, including any form of stereotactic irradiation * Radiographic evidence of brain metastases and/or ipsilateral lung metastases/malignant pleural effusion * Planned concurrent chemotherapy or antitumoral agent during PCI * Concomitant malignancy or malignancy within the past five years other than nonmelanomatous skin cancer or carcinoma in situ of the cervix * Patients with minimal pleural effusion evident on chest X-ray; minimal pleural effusion visible on chest CT is allowed. * Patients with epilepsy requiring permanent oral medication * Patients must not have a serious medical or psychiatric illness that would, in the opinion of the investigator, prevent informed consent or completion of protocol treatment, and/or follow-up visits. * Patients may not take Memantine. This is the only eligibility criterion that has been added to those of RTOG 0212, since some physicians might now prescribe Memantine. This medication would not have been given at the time of enrollment on RTOG 0212 and its administration could confound the results of this study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Effect of Hippocampal-sparing Prophylactic Cranial Irradiation (PCI) on Possible Delayed Recall Toxicity as Assessed by the Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised (HVLT-R) for Delayed RecallBaseline, 6 months and 12 months post radiation treatmentThe primary endpoint of this study is cognitive function or memory. Memory is measured by participant performance on the Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised for delayed recall (HVLT-R-Delayed Recall) at 6 months following hippocampal-sparing PCI. The HVLT-Delayed minimum and Maximum scores are 0-12. A higher score means a better outcome.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Compare Cognitive Function Following Sparing PCI to That of Standard PCIBaselineComposite cognitive function following hippocampal-sparing PCI relative to a historical control receiving standard PCI. HVLT-R Hopkins Verbal Learning Test Revised and Brief Visuospatial Memory Test-Revised (BVMT-R) * Total Recall (0-36) higher = better * Delayed Recall (0-12) higher = better * Discrimination (-12 to 12) higher = better Trail Making A & B (0-300 seconds) higher = poorer Controlled Oral Word Association (COWA) (0-180) higher = better Mini-Mental State Exam (MMSE) (0-30) higher = better Perceptual Comparison Test (PCT) (0-128) higher = better Brief Test of Attention (BTA) (0-20) higher = better Calibrated Ideational Fluency Assessment (CIFA) * Letter Word Fluency (0-120) higher = better * Category Word Fluency (0-120) higher = better * Verbal Fluency (0-240) higher = better Learning and Memory * Verbal Composite T score (mean = 100, standard deviation = 15), higher = better * Visual Composite T score (mean = 100, standard deviation = 15), higher = better
Compare Change in Quality of Life of Hippocampal-sparing PCI Treatment Outcome to Standard PCI Treatment Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ)-C30Baseline and 6 months post radiation treatmentEvaluate quality of life following hippocampal-sparing PCI relative to historical control receiving standard PCI. Difference between 6 months and baseline. Questions on the Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ-C30) assessment are on a four-point scale from not at all to very much. Raw scores are linearly converted to a 0-100 scale with higher scores reflecting higher levels of function and higher levels of symptom burden. Questions on the QLQ-C30 cover the following: * Dyspnoea * Insomnia * Appetite * Constipation * Diarrhoea * Finances * Fatigue * Nausea/Vomiting * Pain * Physical Function * Role Function * Emotional Function * Cognitive Function * Social Function * Global QoL
Compare Change in Quality of Life of Hippocampal-sparing PCI Treatment Outcome to Standard PCI Treatment QLQ-C30Baseline and 12 months post radiation treatmentEvaluate quality of life following hippocampal-sparing PCI relative to historical control receiving standard PCI. Difference between 12 months and baseline. Questions on the Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ-C30) assessment are on a four-point scale from not at all to very much. Raw scores are linearly converted to a 0-100 scale with higher scores reflecting higher levels of function and higher levels of symptom burden. Questions on the QLQ-C30 cover the following: * Dyspnoea * Insomnia * Appetite * Constipation * Diarrhoea * Finances * Fatigue * Nausea/Vomiting * Pain * Physical Function * Role Function * Emotional Function * Cognitive Function * Social Function * Global QoL
Compare Change in Quality of Life of Hippocampal-sparing PCI Treatment Outcome to Standard PCI Treatment Quality of Life Questionnaire-Brain Cancer (QLQ-BN20)Baseline and 6 months post radiation treatmentEvaluate quality of life following hippocampal-sparing PCI relative to historical control receiving standard PCI. Difference between 6 months and baseline. Questions on the Quality of Life Questionnaire-Brain Cancer (QLQ-BN20) are rated on a four-point scale ('not at all', 'a little', 'quite a bit' and 'very much'), and are linearly transformed to a 0-100 scale. Higher scores represent more severe symptoms. Questions on the QLQ-BN20 cover the following: * Headaches * Seizures * Drowsy * Hair loss * Itching * Weakness * Bladder * Future Uncertainty * Visual Disorder * Motor Dysfunction * Communication Deficit
Compare Change in Quality of Life of Hippocampal-sparing PCI Treatment Outcome to Standard PCI Treatment Using the Quality of Life Questionnaire-Brain Cancer (QLQ-BN20).Baseline and 12 months post radiation treatmentEvaluate quality of life following hippocampal-sparing PCI relative to historical control receiving standard PCI. Difference between 12 months and baseline. Questions on the Quality of Life Questionnaire-Brain Cancer (QLQ-BN20) are rated on a four-point scale ('not at all', 'a little', 'quite a bit' and 'very much'), and are linearly transformed to a 0-100 scale. Higher scores represent more severe symptoms. Questions on the QLQ-BN20 cover the following: * Headaches * Seizures * Drowsy * Hair loss * Itching * Weakness * Bladder * Future Uncertainty * Visual Disorder * Motor Dysfunction * Communication Deficit Headaches Seizures Drowsy Hair loss Itching Weakness Bladder Future Uncertainty Scale Visual Disorder Scale Motor Dysfunction Scale Communication Deficit Scale
Number Participants With Hippocampus Brain Metastases Following Sparing PCI12 monthsThe number of participants with brain metastases after sparing PCI treatment was assessed to be compared to two existing studies.
Assess if Development of Leptomeningeal Carcinomatosis Following Sparing PCI is Higher Than Expected6 months, 12 months, 18 months and 24 months post radiation treatmentDetermine whether development of leptomeningeal carcinomatosis following hippocampal-sparing PCI is higher than expected.
Percentage of Participants Surviving Following Hippocampal-sparing PCIUp to 24 months post radiation treatmentTo evaluate the survival rates of study participants following hippocampal-sparing PCI.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Hippocampal-sparing PCI
Hippocampal-sparing PCI 25 Gy in 10 fractions Hippocampal-sparing Prophylactic Cranial Irradiation
20
Total20

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicHippocampal-sparing PCI
Age, Continuous61 years
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
20 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
20 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
12 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
8 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 20
other
Total, other adverse events
20 / 20
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 20

Outcome results

Primary

Effect of Hippocampal-sparing Prophylactic Cranial Irradiation (PCI) on Possible Delayed Recall Toxicity as Assessed by the Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised (HVLT-R) for Delayed Recall

The primary endpoint of this study is cognitive function or memory. Memory is measured by participant performance on the Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised for delayed recall (HVLT-R-Delayed Recall) at 6 months following hippocampal-sparing PCI. The HVLT-Delayed minimum and Maximum scores are 0-12. A higher score means a better outcome.

Time frame: Baseline, 6 months and 12 months post radiation treatment

Population: At the 6 month timepoint, only 17 participants completed the test, and at the 12 month time point only 14 participants took the test.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Hippocampal-sparing PCIEffect of Hippocampal-sparing Prophylactic Cranial Irradiation (PCI) on Possible Delayed Recall Toxicity as Assessed by the Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised (HVLT-R) for Delayed RecallBaseline7.45 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.64
Hippocampal-sparing PCIEffect of Hippocampal-sparing Prophylactic Cranial Irradiation (PCI) on Possible Delayed Recall Toxicity as Assessed by the Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised (HVLT-R) for Delayed Recall6 months7.06 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.77
Hippocampal-sparing PCIEffect of Hippocampal-sparing Prophylactic Cranial Irradiation (PCI) on Possible Delayed Recall Toxicity as Assessed by the Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised (HVLT-R) for Delayed Recall12 months7.36 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.87
Secondary

Assess if Development of Leptomeningeal Carcinomatosis Following Sparing PCI is Higher Than Expected

Determine whether development of leptomeningeal carcinomatosis following hippocampal-sparing PCI is higher than expected.

Time frame: 6 months, 12 months, 18 months and 24 months post radiation treatment

Population: Data for this outcome measure was not collected.

Secondary

Compare Change in Quality of Life of Hippocampal-sparing PCI Treatment Outcome to Standard PCI Treatment QLQ-C30

Evaluate quality of life following hippocampal-sparing PCI relative to historical control receiving standard PCI. Difference between 12 months and baseline. Questions on the Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ-C30) assessment are on a four-point scale from not at all to very much. Raw scores are linearly converted to a 0-100 scale with higher scores reflecting higher levels of function and higher levels of symptom burden. Questions on the QLQ-C30 cover the following: * Dyspnoea * Insomnia * Appetite * Constipation * Diarrhoea * Finances * Fatigue * Nausea/Vomiting * Pain * Physical Function * Role Function * Emotional Function * Cognitive Function * Social Function * Global QoL

Time frame: Baseline and 12 months post radiation treatment

Population: Data is presented for Hippocampal-sparing PCI (from this study). No data from standard PCI for comparison to be done.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Hippocampal-sparing PCICompare Change in Quality of Life of Hippocampal-sparing PCI Treatment Outcome to Standard PCI Treatment QLQ-C30Dyspnoea2.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 26.4
Hippocampal-sparing PCICompare Change in Quality of Life of Hippocampal-sparing PCI Treatment Outcome to Standard PCI Treatment QLQ-C30Insomnia-5.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 31.2
Hippocampal-sparing PCICompare Change in Quality of Life of Hippocampal-sparing PCI Treatment Outcome to Standard PCI Treatment QLQ-C30Appetite-3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10
Hippocampal-sparing PCICompare Change in Quality of Life of Hippocampal-sparing PCI Treatment Outcome to Standard PCI Treatment QLQ-C30Constipation0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 47.1
Hippocampal-sparing PCICompare Change in Quality of Life of Hippocampal-sparing PCI Treatment Outcome to Standard PCI Treatment QLQ-C30Diarrhoea2.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.2
Hippocampal-sparing PCICompare Change in Quality of Life of Hippocampal-sparing PCI Treatment Outcome to Standard PCI Treatment QLQ-C30Finances2.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.3
Hippocampal-sparing PCICompare Change in Quality of Life of Hippocampal-sparing PCI Treatment Outcome to Standard PCI Treatment QLQ-C30Fatigue-0.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.9
Hippocampal-sparing PCICompare Change in Quality of Life of Hippocampal-sparing PCI Treatment Outcome to Standard PCI Treatment QLQ-C30Nausea/Vomiting-1.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 26.1
Hippocampal-sparing PCICompare Change in Quality of Life of Hippocampal-sparing PCI Treatment Outcome to Standard PCI Treatment QLQ-C30Pain2.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.9
Hippocampal-sparing PCICompare Change in Quality of Life of Hippocampal-sparing PCI Treatment Outcome to Standard PCI Treatment QLQ-C30Physical Function-4.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.9
Hippocampal-sparing PCICompare Change in Quality of Life of Hippocampal-sparing PCI Treatment Outcome to Standard PCI Treatment QLQ-C30Role Function0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.5
Hippocampal-sparing PCICompare Change in Quality of Life of Hippocampal-sparing PCI Treatment Outcome to Standard PCI Treatment QLQ-C30Emotional Function5.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.8
Hippocampal-sparing PCICompare Change in Quality of Life of Hippocampal-sparing PCI Treatment Outcome to Standard PCI Treatment QLQ-C30Cognitive Function-9.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.7
Hippocampal-sparing PCICompare Change in Quality of Life of Hippocampal-sparing PCI Treatment Outcome to Standard PCI Treatment QLQ-C30Social Function9.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 23
Hippocampal-sparing PCICompare Change in Quality of Life of Hippocampal-sparing PCI Treatment Outcome to Standard PCI Treatment QLQ-C30Global QoL2.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.9
Secondary

Compare Change in Quality of Life of Hippocampal-sparing PCI Treatment Outcome to Standard PCI Treatment Quality of Life Questionnaire-Brain Cancer (QLQ-BN20)

Evaluate quality of life following hippocampal-sparing PCI relative to historical control receiving standard PCI. Difference between 6 months and baseline. Questions on the Quality of Life Questionnaire-Brain Cancer (QLQ-BN20) are rated on a four-point scale ('not at all', 'a little', 'quite a bit' and 'very much'), and are linearly transformed to a 0-100 scale. Higher scores represent more severe symptoms. Questions on the QLQ-BN20 cover the following: * Headaches * Seizures * Drowsy * Hair loss * Itching * Weakness * Bladder * Future Uncertainty * Visual Disorder * Motor Dysfunction * Communication Deficit

Time frame: Baseline and 6 months post radiation treatment

Population: Data is presented for Hippocampal-sparing PCI (from this study). No data from standard PCI for comparison to be done.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Hippocampal-sparing PCICompare Change in Quality of Life of Hippocampal-sparing PCI Treatment Outcome to Standard PCI Treatment Quality of Life Questionnaire-Brain Cancer (QLQ-BN20)Headaches13.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 32.9
Hippocampal-sparing PCICompare Change in Quality of Life of Hippocampal-sparing PCI Treatment Outcome to Standard PCI Treatment Quality of Life Questionnaire-Brain Cancer (QLQ-BN20)Seizures-4.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.2
Hippocampal-sparing PCICompare Change in Quality of Life of Hippocampal-sparing PCI Treatment Outcome to Standard PCI Treatment Quality of Life Questionnaire-Brain Cancer (QLQ-BN20)Drowsy0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 25.2
Hippocampal-sparing PCICompare Change in Quality of Life of Hippocampal-sparing PCI Treatment Outcome to Standard PCI Treatment Quality of Life Questionnaire-Brain Cancer (QLQ-BN20)Hair loss2.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 29.5
Hippocampal-sparing PCICompare Change in Quality of Life of Hippocampal-sparing PCI Treatment Outcome to Standard PCI Treatment Quality of Life Questionnaire-Brain Cancer (QLQ-BN20)Itching6.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 28.7
Hippocampal-sparing PCICompare Change in Quality of Life of Hippocampal-sparing PCI Treatment Outcome to Standard PCI Treatment Quality of Life Questionnaire-Brain Cancer (QLQ-BN20)Weakness13.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 24.6
Hippocampal-sparing PCICompare Change in Quality of Life of Hippocampal-sparing PCI Treatment Outcome to Standard PCI Treatment Quality of Life Questionnaire-Brain Cancer (QLQ-BN20)Bladder11.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.6
Hippocampal-sparing PCICompare Change in Quality of Life of Hippocampal-sparing PCI Treatment Outcome to Standard PCI Treatment Quality of Life Questionnaire-Brain Cancer (QLQ-BN20)Future Uncertainty0.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 27
Hippocampal-sparing PCICompare Change in Quality of Life of Hippocampal-sparing PCI Treatment Outcome to Standard PCI Treatment Quality of Life Questionnaire-Brain Cancer (QLQ-BN20)Visual Disorder6.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.3
Hippocampal-sparing PCICompare Change in Quality of Life of Hippocampal-sparing PCI Treatment Outcome to Standard PCI Treatment Quality of Life Questionnaire-Brain Cancer (QLQ-BN20)Motor Dysfunction7.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.5
Hippocampal-sparing PCICompare Change in Quality of Life of Hippocampal-sparing PCI Treatment Outcome to Standard PCI Treatment Quality of Life Questionnaire-Brain Cancer (QLQ-BN20)Communication Deficit12.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.5
Secondary

Compare Change in Quality of Life of Hippocampal-sparing PCI Treatment Outcome to Standard PCI Treatment Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ)-C30

Evaluate quality of life following hippocampal-sparing PCI relative to historical control receiving standard PCI. Difference between 6 months and baseline. Questions on the Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ-C30) assessment are on a four-point scale from not at all to very much. Raw scores are linearly converted to a 0-100 scale with higher scores reflecting higher levels of function and higher levels of symptom burden. Questions on the QLQ-C30 cover the following: * Dyspnoea * Insomnia * Appetite * Constipation * Diarrhoea * Finances * Fatigue * Nausea/Vomiting * Pain * Physical Function * Role Function * Emotional Function * Cognitive Function * Social Function * Global QoL

Time frame: Baseline and 6 months post radiation treatment

Population: Data is presented for Hippocampal-sparing PCI (from this study). No data from standard PCI for comparison to be done.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Hippocampal-sparing PCICompare Change in Quality of Life of Hippocampal-sparing PCI Treatment Outcome to Standard PCI Treatment Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ)-C30Dyspnoea11.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 30
Hippocampal-sparing PCICompare Change in Quality of Life of Hippocampal-sparing PCI Treatment Outcome to Standard PCI Treatment Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ)-C30Insomnia-9.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 30.5
Hippocampal-sparing PCICompare Change in Quality of Life of Hippocampal-sparing PCI Treatment Outcome to Standard PCI Treatment Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ)-C30Appetite20 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 32.9
Hippocampal-sparing PCICompare Change in Quality of Life of Hippocampal-sparing PCI Treatment Outcome to Standard PCI Treatment Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ)-C30Constipation6.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 44
Hippocampal-sparing PCICompare Change in Quality of Life of Hippocampal-sparing PCI Treatment Outcome to Standard PCI Treatment Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ)-C30Diarrhoea0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.6
Hippocampal-sparing PCICompare Change in Quality of Life of Hippocampal-sparing PCI Treatment Outcome to Standard PCI Treatment Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ)-C30Finances2.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 35.7
Hippocampal-sparing PCICompare Change in Quality of Life of Hippocampal-sparing PCI Treatment Outcome to Standard PCI Treatment Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ)-C30Fatigue14.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 26.4
Hippocampal-sparing PCICompare Change in Quality of Life of Hippocampal-sparing PCI Treatment Outcome to Standard PCI Treatment Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ)-C30Nausea/Vomiting3.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 25.4
Hippocampal-sparing PCICompare Change in Quality of Life of Hippocampal-sparing PCI Treatment Outcome to Standard PCI Treatment Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ)-C30Pain2.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 31.4
Hippocampal-sparing PCICompare Change in Quality of Life of Hippocampal-sparing PCI Treatment Outcome to Standard PCI Treatment Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ)-C30Physical Function-11.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.8
Hippocampal-sparing PCICompare Change in Quality of Life of Hippocampal-sparing PCI Treatment Outcome to Standard PCI Treatment Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ)-C30Role Function-4.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.1
Hippocampal-sparing PCICompare Change in Quality of Life of Hippocampal-sparing PCI Treatment Outcome to Standard PCI Treatment Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ)-C30Emotional Function0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 22
Hippocampal-sparing PCICompare Change in Quality of Life of Hippocampal-sparing PCI Treatment Outcome to Standard PCI Treatment Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ)-C30Cognitive Function11.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.3
Hippocampal-sparing PCICompare Change in Quality of Life of Hippocampal-sparing PCI Treatment Outcome to Standard PCI Treatment Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ)-C30Social Function8.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 35
Hippocampal-sparing PCICompare Change in Quality of Life of Hippocampal-sparing PCI Treatment Outcome to Standard PCI Treatment Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ)-C30Global QoL-5.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 26.3
Secondary

Compare Change in Quality of Life of Hippocampal-sparing PCI Treatment Outcome to Standard PCI Treatment Using the Quality of Life Questionnaire-Brain Cancer (QLQ-BN20).

Evaluate quality of life following hippocampal-sparing PCI relative to historical control receiving standard PCI. Difference between 12 months and baseline. Questions on the Quality of Life Questionnaire-Brain Cancer (QLQ-BN20) are rated on a four-point scale ('not at all', 'a little', 'quite a bit' and 'very much'), and are linearly transformed to a 0-100 scale. Higher scores represent more severe symptoms. Questions on the QLQ-BN20 cover the following: * Headaches * Seizures * Drowsy * Hair loss * Itching * Weakness * Bladder * Future Uncertainty * Visual Disorder * Motor Dysfunction * Communication Deficit Headaches Seizures Drowsy Hair loss Itching Weakness Bladder Future Uncertainty Scale Visual Disorder Scale Motor Dysfunction Scale Communication Deficit Scale

Time frame: Baseline and 12 months post radiation treatment

Population: Data is presented for Hippocampal-sparing PCI (from this study). No data from standard PCI for comparison to be done.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Hippocampal-sparing PCICompare Change in Quality of Life of Hippocampal-sparing PCI Treatment Outcome to Standard PCI Treatment Using the Quality of Life Questionnaire-Brain Cancer (QLQ-BN20).Headaches9.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 33.6
Hippocampal-sparing PCICompare Change in Quality of Life of Hippocampal-sparing PCI Treatment Outcome to Standard PCI Treatment Using the Quality of Life Questionnaire-Brain Cancer (QLQ-BN20).Seizures-3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.1
Hippocampal-sparing PCICompare Change in Quality of Life of Hippocampal-sparing PCI Treatment Outcome to Standard PCI Treatment Using the Quality of Life Questionnaire-Brain Cancer (QLQ-BN20).Drowsy-6.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 29.1
Hippocampal-sparing PCICompare Change in Quality of Life of Hippocampal-sparing PCI Treatment Outcome to Standard PCI Treatment Using the Quality of Life Questionnaire-Brain Cancer (QLQ-BN20).Hair loss-15.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.9
Hippocampal-sparing PCICompare Change in Quality of Life of Hippocampal-sparing PCI Treatment Outcome to Standard PCI Treatment Using the Quality of Life Questionnaire-Brain Cancer (QLQ-BN20).Itching9.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.6
Hippocampal-sparing PCICompare Change in Quality of Life of Hippocampal-sparing PCI Treatment Outcome to Standard PCI Treatment Using the Quality of Life Questionnaire-Brain Cancer (QLQ-BN20).Weakness6.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 29.1
Hippocampal-sparing PCICompare Change in Quality of Life of Hippocampal-sparing PCI Treatment Outcome to Standard PCI Treatment Using the Quality of Life Questionnaire-Brain Cancer (QLQ-BN20).Bladder12.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 30.8
Hippocampal-sparing PCICompare Change in Quality of Life of Hippocampal-sparing PCI Treatment Outcome to Standard PCI Treatment Using the Quality of Life Questionnaire-Brain Cancer (QLQ-BN20).Future Uncertainty-3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.9
Hippocampal-sparing PCICompare Change in Quality of Life of Hippocampal-sparing PCI Treatment Outcome to Standard PCI Treatment Using the Quality of Life Questionnaire-Brain Cancer (QLQ-BN20).Visual Disorder3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.3
Hippocampal-sparing PCICompare Change in Quality of Life of Hippocampal-sparing PCI Treatment Outcome to Standard PCI Treatment Using the Quality of Life Questionnaire-Brain Cancer (QLQ-BN20).Motor Dysfunction6.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.5
Hippocampal-sparing PCICompare Change in Quality of Life of Hippocampal-sparing PCI Treatment Outcome to Standard PCI Treatment Using the Quality of Life Questionnaire-Brain Cancer (QLQ-BN20).Communication Deficit6.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.9
Secondary

Compare Cognitive Function Following Sparing PCI to That of Standard PCI

Composite cognitive function following hippocampal-sparing PCI relative to a historical control receiving standard PCI. HVLT-R Hopkins Verbal Learning Test Revised and Brief Visuospatial Memory Test-Revised (BVMT-R) * Total Recall (0-36) higher = better * Delayed Recall (0-12) higher = better * Discrimination (-12 to 12) higher = better Trail Making A & B (0-300 seconds) higher = poorer Controlled Oral Word Association (COWA) (0-180) higher = better Mini-Mental State Exam (MMSE) (0-30) higher = better Perceptual Comparison Test (PCT) (0-128) higher = better Brief Test of Attention (BTA) (0-20) higher = better Calibrated Ideational Fluency Assessment (CIFA) * Letter Word Fluency (0-120) higher = better * Category Word Fluency (0-120) higher = better * Verbal Fluency (0-240) higher = better Learning and Memory * Verbal Composite T score (mean = 100, standard deviation = 15), higher = better * Visual Composite T score (mean = 100, standard deviation = 15), higher = better

Time frame: 12 months post radiation treatment

Population: Data is presented for Hippocampal-sparing PCI (from this study). 14 participants completed the test at 12 months. No data from standard PCI for comparison to be done.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Hippocampal-sparing PCICompare Cognitive Function Following Sparing PCI to That of Standard PCIHVLT-R Total Recall21.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.94
Hippocampal-sparing PCICompare Cognitive Function Following Sparing PCI to That of Standard PCIHVLT-R Delayed Recall7.36 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.87
Hippocampal-sparing PCICompare Cognitive Function Following Sparing PCI to That of Standard PCIHVLT-R Discrimination10.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.22
Hippocampal-sparing PCICompare Cognitive Function Following Sparing PCI to That of Standard PCITrail Making A29.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.3
Hippocampal-sparing PCICompare Cognitive Function Following Sparing PCI to That of Standard PCITrail Making B101.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 72.3
Hippocampal-sparing PCICompare Cognitive Function Following Sparing PCI to That of Standard PCICOWA34.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.5
Hippocampal-sparing PCICompare Cognitive Function Following Sparing PCI to That of Standard PCIMMSE27.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.7
Hippocampal-sparing PCICompare Cognitive Function Following Sparing PCI to That of Standard PCIPCT55.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.8
Hippocampal-sparing PCICompare Cognitive Function Following Sparing PCI to That of Standard PCIBTA14.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.31
Hippocampal-sparing PCICompare Cognitive Function Following Sparing PCI to That of Standard PCICIFA: Letter Word Fluency25.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.88
Hippocampal-sparing PCICompare Cognitive Function Following Sparing PCI to That of Standard PCICIFA: Category Word Fluency42.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.78
Hippocampal-sparing PCICompare Cognitive Function Following Sparing PCI to That of Standard PCICIFA: Verbal Fluency66.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.1
Hippocampal-sparing PCICompare Cognitive Function Following Sparing PCI to That of Standard PCIBVMT-R Total Recall19.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.29
Hippocampal-sparing PCICompare Cognitive Function Following Sparing PCI to That of Standard PCIBVMT-R Delayed Recall7.50 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.38
Hippocampal-sparing PCICompare Cognitive Function Following Sparing PCI to That of Standard PCIBVMT-R Discrimination5.71 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.611
Hippocampal-sparing PCICompare Cognitive Function Following Sparing PCI to That of Standard PCILearning and Memory: Verbal92.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.7
Hippocampal-sparing PCICompare Cognitive Function Following Sparing PCI to That of Standard PCILearning and Memory: Visual94.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.5
Secondary

Compare Cognitive Function Following Sparing PCI to That of Standard PCI

Composite cognitive function following hippocampal-sparing PCI relative to a historical control receiving standard PCI. HVLT-R Hopkins Verbal Learning Test Revised and Brief Visuospatial Memory Test-Revised (BVMT-R) * Total Recall (0-36) higher = better * Delayed Recall (0-12) higher = better * Discrimination (-12 to 12) higher = better Trail Making A & B (0-300 seconds) higher = poorer Controlled Oral Word Association (COWA) (0-180) higher = better Mini-Mental State Exam (MMSE) (0-30) higher = better Perceptual Comparison Test (PCT) (0-128) higher = better Brief Test of Attention (BTA) (0-20) higher = better Calibrated Ideational Fluency Assessment (CIFA) * Letter Word Fluency (0-120) higher = better * Category Word Fluency (0-120) higher = better * Verbal Fluency (0-240) higher = better Learning and Memory * Verbal Composite T score (mean = 100, standard deviation = 15), higher = better * Visual Composite T score (mean = 100, standard deviation = 15), higher = better

Time frame: 6 months post radiation treatment

Population: Data is presented for Hippocampal-sparing PCI (from this study). 14 participants completed the test at 6 months. No data from standard PCI for comparison to be done.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Hippocampal-sparing PCICompare Cognitive Function Following Sparing PCI to That of Standard PCIHVLT-R Total Recall23.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.44
Hippocampal-sparing PCICompare Cognitive Function Following Sparing PCI to That of Standard PCIHVLT-R Delayed Recall7.06 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.77
Hippocampal-sparing PCICompare Cognitive Function Following Sparing PCI to That of Standard PCIHVLT-R Discrimination11.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.76
Hippocampal-sparing PCICompare Cognitive Function Following Sparing PCI to That of Standard PCITrail Making A34.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.3
Hippocampal-sparing PCICompare Cognitive Function Following Sparing PCI to That of Standard PCITrail Making B101 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 69.5
Hippocampal-sparing PCICompare Cognitive Function Following Sparing PCI to That of Standard PCICOWA31.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.1
Hippocampal-sparing PCICompare Cognitive Function Following Sparing PCI to That of Standard PCIMMSE27.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.1
Hippocampal-sparing PCICompare Cognitive Function Following Sparing PCI to That of Standard PCIPCT54.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 15
Hippocampal-sparing PCICompare Cognitive Function Following Sparing PCI to That of Standard PCIBTA15.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.22
Hippocampal-sparing PCICompare Cognitive Function Following Sparing PCI to That of Standard PCICIFA: Letter Word Fluency24.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.7
Hippocampal-sparing PCICompare Cognitive Function Following Sparing PCI to That of Standard PCICIFA: Category Word Fluency40.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.1
Hippocampal-sparing PCICompare Cognitive Function Following Sparing PCI to That of Standard PCICIFA: Verbal Fluency65.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.9
Hippocampal-sparing PCICompare Cognitive Function Following Sparing PCI to That of Standard PCIBVMT-R Total Recall18.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.5
Hippocampal-sparing PCICompare Cognitive Function Following Sparing PCI to That of Standard PCIBVMT-R Delayed Recall7.64 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.28
Hippocampal-sparing PCICompare Cognitive Function Following Sparing PCI to That of Standard PCIBVMT-R Discrimination5.64 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.08
Hippocampal-sparing PCICompare Cognitive Function Following Sparing PCI to That of Standard PCILearning and Memory: Verbal95.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 18
Hippocampal-sparing PCICompare Cognitive Function Following Sparing PCI to That of Standard PCILearning and Memory: Visual96.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.1
Secondary

Compare Cognitive Function Following Sparing PCI to That of Standard PCI

Composite cognitive function following hippocampal-sparing PCI relative to a historical control receiving standard PCI. HVLT-R Hopkins Verbal Learning Test Revised and Brief Visuospatial Memory Test-Revised (BVMT-R) * Total Recall (0-36) higher = better * Delayed Recall (0-12) higher = better * Discrimination (-12 to 12) higher = better Trail Making A & B (0-300 seconds) higher = poorer Controlled Oral Word Association (COWA) (0-180) higher = better Mini-Mental State Exam (MMSE) (0-30) higher = better Perceptual Comparison Test (PCT) (0-128) higher = better Brief Test of Attention (BTA) (0-20) higher = better Calibrated Ideational Fluency Assessment (CIFA) * Letter Word Fluency (0-120) higher = better * Category Word Fluency (0-120) higher = better * Verbal Fluency (0-240) higher = better Learning and Memory * Verbal Composite T score (mean = 100, standard deviation = 15), higher = better * Visual Composite T score (mean = 100, standard deviation = 15), higher = better

Time frame: Baseline

Population: Data is presented for Hippocampal-sparing PCI (from this study). 19 participants completed the test at baseline. No data from standard PCI for comparison to be done.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Hippocampal-sparing PCICompare Cognitive Function Following Sparing PCI to That of Standard PCIBVMT-R Discrimination5.74 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.562
Hippocampal-sparing PCICompare Cognitive Function Following Sparing PCI to That of Standard PCILearning and Memory: Verbal93.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.2
Hippocampal-sparing PCICompare Cognitive Function Following Sparing PCI to That of Standard PCILearning and Memory: Visual96.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.7
Hippocampal-sparing PCICompare Cognitive Function Following Sparing PCI to That of Standard PCIHVLT-R Total Recall23.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.35
Hippocampal-sparing PCICompare Cognitive Function Following Sparing PCI to That of Standard PCIHVLT-R Delayed Recall7.45 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.64
Hippocampal-sparing PCICompare Cognitive Function Following Sparing PCI to That of Standard PCIHVLT-R Discrimination10.75 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.25
Hippocampal-sparing PCICompare Cognitive Function Following Sparing PCI to That of Standard PCITrail Making A30.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.79
Hippocampal-sparing PCICompare Cognitive Function Following Sparing PCI to That of Standard PCITrail Making B89.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 59
Hippocampal-sparing PCICompare Cognitive Function Following Sparing PCI to That of Standard PCICOWA32.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.7
Hippocampal-sparing PCICompare Cognitive Function Following Sparing PCI to That of Standard PCIMMSE28.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.05
Hippocampal-sparing PCICompare Cognitive Function Following Sparing PCI to That of Standard PCIPCT59.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.7
Hippocampal-sparing PCICompare Cognitive Function Following Sparing PCI to That of Standard PCIBTA16.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.93
Hippocampal-sparing PCICompare Cognitive Function Following Sparing PCI to That of Standard PCICIFA: Letter Word Fluency25.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.75
Hippocampal-sparing PCICompare Cognitive Function Following Sparing PCI to That of Standard PCICIFA: Category Word Fluency44.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.39
Hippocampal-sparing PCICompare Cognitive Function Following Sparing PCI to That of Standard PCICIFA: Verbal Fluency68.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.3
Hippocampal-sparing PCICompare Cognitive Function Following Sparing PCI to That of Standard PCIBVMT-R Total Recall19.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.9
Hippocampal-sparing PCICompare Cognitive Function Following Sparing PCI to That of Standard PCIBVMT-R Delayed Recall8.63 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.62
Secondary

Number Participants With Hippocampus Brain Metastases Following Sparing PCI

The number of participants with brain metastases after sparing PCI treatment was assessed to be compared to two existing studies.

Time frame: 12 months

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Hippocampal-sparing PCINumber Participants With Hippocampus Brain Metastases Following Sparing PCI4 Participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Surviving Following Hippocampal-sparing PCI

To evaluate the survival rates of study participants following hippocampal-sparing PCI.

Time frame: Up to 24 months post radiation treatment

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Hippocampal-sparing PCIPercentage of Participants Surviving Following Hippocampal-sparing PCI88 percentage of participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 10, 2026