Skip to content

Study to Determine the Effect of Azasite on Corneal Surface Irregularity

A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study to Determine the Effect of Azasite on Corneal Surface Irregularity in Subjects With Meibomian Gland Dysfunction

Status
Withdrawn
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01797107
Enrollment
0
Registered
2013-02-22
Start date
2013-03-31
Completion date
2014-07-31
Last updated
2016-09-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Meibomian Gland Dysfunction

Keywords

Meibomian gland dysfunction

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effect of Azasite on patients with corneal surface irregularity (meibomian gland dysfunction).

Detailed description

This will be a single-center, randomized, vehicle-controlled, double-masked, clinical trial comparing a four week course of Azasite (azithromycin ophthalmic 1%) to vehicle (Durasite®) in patients with MGD-related evaporative dry eye. All patients will be evaluated at screening, baseline, two weeks, four weeks, and six weeks. The primary outcome measure will be improvement, as compared to baseline, in corneal irregularity as measured by a topographically-derived value, the Corneal Irregularity Measurement (CIM). Secondary outcome measures will be a global symptom score, tear film break up time, meibomian gland secretion characteristics, best-corrected distance visual acuity, corneal staining, axial topography based astigmatism patterns, and IOL Master keratometry. We will enroll 60 eyes of 30 patients, and each patient will be randomly assigned to receive Azasite in one eye and vehicle (Durasite®) in the fellow eye.

Interventions

Patients will be given 1 drop twice a day for 2 days followed by 1 drop nightly for 4 weeks.

Sponsors

Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Thomas Jefferson University
CollaboratorOTHER
Philadelphia Eye Associates
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Ability to provide informed consent prior to enrollment in study * Patient ability to follow study instructions and comply with all study protocols * Corneal irregularity measurement (CIM) \> 1.7 in both eyes * Non-atrophic meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD) as defined by abnormal meibomian expression in at least 2 meibomian glands of the eyelids of each eye * At least two symptoms of at least moderate severity (≥ grade 2, 0 to 3 scale) as defined in the MGD Global Symptom Score (Itching, Foreign-body sensation, Dryness, Burning, Lid swelling) * Tear film break up time \< 10 seconds * Schirmer with anesthesia \> 5 mm * Best corrected distance visual acuity (BCDVA) \> 20/100

Exclusion criteria

* Cicatricial or atrophic meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD) * Any corneal disease or scar involving the central 6 mm, including epithelial basement membrane dystrophy, Salzmann nodular degeneration, recurrent erosions, keratoconus or ectasia * Use of azithromycin or doxycycline within 1 month of screening * Topical ocular antibiotic, anti-histamines, allergy, or steroid medication within 2 weeks of baseline (a 2 week washout after screening will be allowed) * Topical prostaglandin analogue use within 30 days of study * The anticipated use of any drops, gels or ointments during the study period outside of the study protocol * Use of eye make-up during study period * Active ocular infection or inflammation * History of herpetic eye disease or neurotrophic keratitis * Lid pathology (except MGD or blepharitis) that the examiner feels may affect the ocular surface * Significant conjunctival scars (ex. h/o SJS) * Pterygium * Lacrimal punctal occlusion within 2 months of screening * Ocular surgery within 1 year of screening * Monocular patients * Pregnant, breast-feeding, or sexually active females not using contraception * Uncontrolled systemic disease * Presence of any disease (medical or ocular) that, in the opinion of the investigator, may interfere with the study's safety or interpretation * Known allergy to the study medication or its components * Current enrollment in an investigational drug or device study within 30 days of screening for this study

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Corneal Irregularity Measurement4 weeksTopographically defined corneal smoothness as compared to baseline measurement at day 0

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Global symptoms score2,4 and 6 weeks0-3 score of itching, foreign body sensation, dryness, burning and swelling as compared to baseline measurement at day 0
Meibomian gland secretion characteristics2, 4 and 6 weeksMeibum secretions of the eyelids will be assessed at each visit by pressing on the lower or upper lid (with a finger) until excretions are seen from at least 2 meibomian glands. The following scale, based on a scale in a study by Mathers et al (Mathers et al. Meibomian Gland Dysfunction in Chronic Blepharitis. Cornea .1991;10(4): 277-285.) will be used: NE= \<2 glands expressible = Atrophic or Cicatricial MGD (exclusion at Visit 1 and 2) 0= clear secretion (normal) 1. opaque secretion with normal viscosity 2. opaque secretion with increased viscosity 3. severely thickened secretion, toothpaste consistency At each time point, these characteristics will be compared to baseline at day 0.
Best corrected distance visual acuity2, 4 and 6 weeksas compared to baseline measurement at day 0
Axial topography based astigmatism pattern2, 4 and 6 weeksPatterns will be compared to baseline at day 0. All topography testing will be performed using the same machine and system, the Carl Zeiss Meditec Atlas, Model 9000, system 3.0.0.39. The topographic pattern will be reviewed by a masked investigator (masked to eye randomization), and categorized as one of the following: 1. Normal/Symmetrical: Includes round, oval, or symmetric bowtie patterns 2. Asymmetric bowtie: Differentiated from symmetric bowtie by a difference between axial keratometry readings along the two lobes of \>1D at points 1.5mm from the center, or a difference in the widths of the lobes of the bowties at that distance of \>33%. 3. Irregular: Includes skewed radial axis (skewing by \>20%), inferior or superior steepening (I-S asymmetry \>1.2D); or a pattern that does not fit either 1 or 2 above.
Intraocular Lens(IOL) Master Keratometry2, 4 and 6 weeksAs compared to baseline at day 0.
Change in Corneal Irregularity Measurement2 weeks, 6 weeksTopographically defined corneal smoothness as compared to baseline measurement at day 0
Corneal staining2, 4 and 6 weeksUsing NEI industry workshop scale. Scores will be compared to baseline measurement at day 0

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Tear film break-up time2, 4 and 6 weeksFluorescein break up time

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026