Skip to content

Digoxin Versus Ivabradine in Heart Failure With Preserved Systolic Function

Comparison of Digoxin and Ivabradine in Heart Failure With Preserved Systolic Function.

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01796093
Acronym
DIGvsIVA
Enrollment
42
Registered
2013-02-21
Start date
2008-04-30
Completion date
2012-02-29
Last updated
2017-02-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Atrial Fibrillation, Heart Failure

Keywords

Digoxin, Ivabradine, Cardiac failure, Economics

Brief summary

This is an investigator-started study. The trial is coded as no. GC&PJ-Dig-Iva2009-2012. The authors have no conflict of interest and there was no financial sponsoring The study was planned according to the Good Clinical Quality standards using an intention-to-treat analysis. The protocol was approved from the ethics committee. Selected patients gave their written informed consent. The family practitioners agreed and obtained the collected data and analysis. Analysis of collected data was performed by a single-blinded author (without knowledge of the used test drug and time of collection of data). Study Hypothesis: Compare the effect of digoxin and ivabradine in chronic heart failure with permanent atrial fibrillation (ischemic etiology). Multiple Time Frames: Primary Outcome is measured before and after each medical intervention. Measurements at baseline and after 3 month of therapy (twice, with the 2 different drugs): Measurements Severity of dyspnea. Digoxin serum concentration. ECG: Heart rate at rest and during 6-min walking test. Cardiac function (echocardiography): systolic function (ejection rate, left trial size,diastolic function. Participants were followed (ambulatory observation) for at least 3 months

Detailed description

Selected patients had chronic coronary artery disease which had been treated with percutaneous dilatation & stenting and/or aortocoronary bypass. The severity of myocardial ischemia had induced heart failure with diastolic dysfunction and preserved systolic function, and permanent AF. 1 Inclusion criteria: Dyspnea class III NYHA. Abnormal left ventricular relaxation with preserved (≥52%) ejection fraction (LVEF). Patients either in sinus rhythm or with permanent atrial fibrillation. 2\. Exclusion criteria: Unstable angina pectoris. Reduced systolic cardiac function (LVEF\<52%). Normal diastolic function. Diabetes requiring insulin. Moderate or severe renal or hepatic dysfunction. Technically insufficient echocardiography.

Interventions

DRUGDigoxin and ivabradine

No more details

Sponsors

Cardiology Office, Rheinfelden, Switzerland
CollaboratorOTHER
Cocco, Giuseppe, M.D.
Lead SponsorINDIV

Study design

Observational model
CASE_CROSSOVER
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
60 Years to 78 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

No need to change concomitant pharmacological therapy in the following months, dyspnea class III NYHA, and abnormal left ventricular relaxation with preserved (≥52%) left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF).

Exclusion criteria

Unstable myocardial ischemia, reduced systolic cardiac function (LVEF\<52%), diabetes mellitus requiring insulin, moderate or severe renal or hepatic dysfunction, or technically insufficient echocardiography.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Cardiac function (diastolic and systolic function)After 12-14 weeksCardiac function (echocardiography): systolic function (i.e. LVEF) and diastolic function (Doppler E/A ratio, tissue Doppler e/e1 ratio, Doppler deceleration time of the E wave.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Dyspnea.After 12-14.weeksChanges in dyspnea NYHA class).
NB-proBNP valueAfter 12-14 weeksChanges (serum values) after therapy.
Body weight12-14. weeksChanges after therapy
Left atrial sizeAfter 12-14 weeksChange (size).
Heart rate and blood pressure.After 12-14 weeksChanges in heart rate and blood pressure.
LaboratoryAfter 12-14 weeksAny changes in hematology, electrolytes, renal and hepatic function.
Side-effectsAfter 12-14 weeksAny side-effects, spontaneously reported or after specific questionining.
6-min walk testAfter 12-14 weeks.Changes in length of the walk test and heart rate during the test.
ECGAfter 12-14 weeksChanges (heart rate,PR-interval, QRS morphology and duration), ST-T segment, other arrhythmias

Countries

Switzerland

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026