Skip to content

Study Evaluating ABT-199 in Participants With Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma

A Phase 1/2 Study Evaluating the Safety and Pharmacokinetics of ABT-199 in Subjects With Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 1Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01794520
Enrollment
117
Registered
2013-02-20
Start date
2012-10-10
Completion date
2021-11-29
Last updated
2023-04-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma

Keywords

Relapsed multiple myeloma, Refractory multiple myeloma, Multiple myeloma, Relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma

Brief summary

The Phase 1 primary objectives of this study were to assess the safety profile, characterize pharmacokinetics (PK) and determine the dosing schedule, maximum tolerated dose (MTD), and recommended Phase 2 dose (RPTD) of ABT-199 (venetoclax) when administered in participants with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. This study also assessed the safety profile and PK of venetoclax in combination with dexamethasone in participants with t(11;14)-positive multiple myeloma. The Phase 2 primary objective was to further evaluate the objective response rate (ORR) and very good partial response or better rate (VGPR+) in participants with t(11;14)-positive multiple myeloma.

Interventions

DRUGVenetoclax

Each dose of venetoclax was to be taken with approximately 240 mL of water. On days that pre-dose pharmacokinetic (PK) sampling was required, dosing was to occur in the morning at the clinic at approximately 0900 (± 1 hour) to facilitate PK sampling. Dose Escalation cohort participants were to take venetoclax within 30 minutes after the completion of a standard low-fat breakfast with approximately 240 mL of water on Cycle 2 Day 1. On all other dosing days, participants were instructed to take venetoclax orally QD within 30 minutes after the completion of a low-fat breakfast. Tablets were to be swallowed whole and must not have been broken, chewed, or crushed.

DRUGDexamethasone

Tablets were administered by mouth per the dexamethasone prescribing information.

Sponsors

Genentech, Inc.
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
AbbVie
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SEQUENTIAL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* ECOG (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group) performance score of 1 or 0. Participants in the Phase 2 portion: ECOG performance score of 2, 1, or 0. * Diagnosis of multiple myeloma (MM) previously treated with at least one prior line of therapy. * Induction therapy followed by stem cell transplant and maintenance therapy will be considered a single line of therapy. * For Safety Expansion, participants must have been previously treated with a proteasome inhibitor (e.g., bortezomib) and an immunomodulatory agent (e.g., thalidomide, lenalidomide). * For Venetoclax-Dexamethasone Combination, participants must have been previously treated with a proteasome inhibitor (e.g., bortezomib) and an immunomodulatory agent (e.g., thalidomide, lenalidomide) AND have t(11;14)-positive multiple myeloma per the central lab testing. * For Phase 2, participants must have MM positive for the t(11;14) translocation, as determined by an analytically validated fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) assay per the central laboratory testing (enrollment with local t(11;14)-positive FISH results only will be considered at the discretion of the Therapeutic Area MD). Participants must have evidence of disease progression on or within 60 days of last dose of most recent previous treatment based on International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) criteria AND must have previously received at least 2 lines of therapy, including an immunomodulatory drug (lenalidomide or pomalidomide), a proteasome inhibitor (bortezomib, carfilzomib or ixazomib), daratumumab, and glucocorticoids. * For US participants: Daratumumab combination regimen must be one of the prior lines of therapy (for this study, daratumumab plus corticosteroids will not be considered a combination regimen). * For Non-US participants: Either daratumumab monotherapy or combination therapy is acceptable. Daratumumab monotherapy will be limited to approximately 20 percent of the total number of Phase 2 participants. * Measurable disease at Screening: * Serum monoclonal protein of at least 1.0 g/dL (10g/L) by protein electrophoresis. * At least 200 mg of monoclonal protein in the urine on 24-hr electrophoresis. * Serum immunoglobulin free light chain of at least 10 mg/dL and abnormal serum immunoglobulin kappa to lambda free light chain ratio. * Participants with a history of autologous or allogenic stem cell transplantation must have adequate peripheral blood counts independent of any growth factor support, and have recovered from any transplant related toxicity(s) and be: * At least 100 days post-autologous transplant prior to first dose of study drug or * At least 6 months post-allogenic transplant prior to first dose of study drug and not have active graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), i.e., requiring treatment. * Meet the following laboratory parameters, per the reference range, at least once during the screening period: * Absolute Neutrophil Count (ANC) of at least 1000/μL (Participants may use growth factor support to achieve ANC eligibility criteria). * Aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) not higher than 3 x Upper Limit of Normal Range (ULN). * Calculated creatinine clearance of at least 30 mL/min using a modified Cockcroft-Gault calculation. * Platelet count of at least 30,000 mm³ (independent of transfusion for 2 weeks). * Hemoglobin of at least 8.0 g/dL (participants may receive blood transfusion to achieve hemoglobin eligibility criteria). * Total bilirubin not higher than 1.5 x ULN (Participants with Gilbert's Syndrome may have bilirubin higher than 1.5 x ULN).

Exclusion criteria

* Exhibits evidence of other clinically significant uncontrolled condition(s), including, but not limited to: * Acute infection within 14 days prior to first dose of study drug requiring antibiotic, antifungal, or antiviral therapy. * Diagnosis of fever and neutropenia within 1 week prior to first dose of study drug. * Cardiovascular disability status of New York Heart Association Class ≥ 3. * Significant history of renal, neurologic, psychiatric, endocrinologic, metabolic, immunologic, cardiovascular or hepatic disease, within the last 6 months that, in the opinion of the investigator, would adversely affect his/her participation in the study. * History of other active malignancies other than multiple myeloma within the past 3 years prior to study entry, with the following exceptions: * Adequately treated in situ carcinoma of the cervix uteri; * Basal cell carcinoma of the skin or localized squamous cell carcinoma of the skin; * Localized prostate cancer Gleason grade 6 or lower AND with stable prostate specific antigen (PSA) levels off treatment * Previous malignancy confined and surgically resected (or treated with other modalities) with curative intent. * Known Human Immunodeficiency Viral (HIV) infection. * Active hepatitis B or C infection.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants With Adverse EventsFrom first dose of study drug until 30 days following last dose of study drug (up to 2482 days)An adverse event (AE) is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a patient or clinical investigation participant administered a pharmaceutical product which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. The investigator assesses the relationship of each event to the use of study drug. A serious adverse event (SAE) is an event that results in death, is life-threatening, requires or prolongs hospitalization, results in a congenital anomaly, persistent or significant disability/incapacity or is an important medical event that, based on medical judgment, may jeopardize the participant and may require medical or surgical intervention to prevent any of the outcomes listed above. Treatment-emergent adverse events/treatment-emergent serious adverse events (TEAEs/TESAEs) are defined as any event that began or worsened in severity on or after the first dose of study drug.
Phase 1: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of VenetoclaxCycle 2, Day 1 at predose, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 24 hours postdoseCmax is the highest concentration that a drug achieves in the blood after administration in a dosing interval.
Phase 1: Time to Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of VenetoclaxCycle 2, Day 1 at predose, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 24 hours postdoseTmax is the the time at which the maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) is observed.
Phase 1: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve Over Time From 0 to 24 Hours (AUC0-24) of VenetoclaxCycle 2, Day 1 at predose, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 24 hours postdose (dose escalation cohort); (1200 mg dose): Cycle 2, Day 1 at predose (safety expansion cohort, 1200 mg dose)AUC is a measure of how long and how much drug is present in the body after dosing.
Phase 2: Overall Response RateResponse was assessed at Cycle 2, Day 1, and on Day 1 of every cycle thereafter; estimated median time on follow-up was 31.7 monthsOverall response rate is defined as the percentage of participants with documented best overall response of Partial Response (PR) or better (PR, Very good partial response \[VGPR\], Complete response \[CR\], or Stringent complete response \[sCR\]) per 2016 standard International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) criteria.
Phase 2: Very Good Partial Response Rate or BetterResponse was assessed at Cycle 2, Day 1, and on Day 1 of every cycle thereafter; estimated median time on follow-up was 31.7 monthsThe percentage of participants with documented best overall response of Very Good Partial Response (VGPR) or better (VGPR, Complete response \[CR\], or Stringent complete response \[sCR\]) per 2016 standard International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) criteria was computed.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Phase 2: Mean Change From Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory - Short Form (BPI-SF) Worst PainBaseline; Cycle 3, Day 1; Cycle 5, Day 1; Cycle 7, Day 1; Cycle 9, Day 1; Cycle 11, Day 1; Cycle 13, Day 1; Cycle 15, Day 1; Cycle 17, Day 1; Cycle 19, Day 1; Cycle 21, Day 1; Cycle 23, Day 1; Cycle 25, Day 1; Final visitThe BPI-SF is a pain-specific measure developed to assess patient-reported severity (or intensity) of pain (4 items) and the impact of pain on daily functioning (7 items) in patients with cancer pain. The four pain severity items assess pain at its worst in last 24 hours, least in last 24 hours, average, and now (current pain). For these items, participants are asked to rate their pain on an 11-point numeric rating scale with anchors of 0 (no pain) and 10 (pain as bad as you can imagine). The Worst Pain scores range from 0 to 10, with higher scores indicating severe pain. Negative changes from baseline indicate improvement.
Phase 2: Mean Change From Baseline in Physical Functioning Scale of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)Baseline; Cycle 3, Day 1; Cycle 5, Day 1; Cycle 7, Day 1; Cycle 9, Day 1; Cycle 11, Day 1; Cycle 13, Day 1; Cycle 15, Day 1; Cycle 17, Day 1; Cycle 19, Day 1; Cycle 21, Day 1; Cycle 23, Day 1; Cycle 25, Day 1; Final visitThe QLQ-C30 is a 30-item subject self-report questionnaire composed of both multi-item and single scales, including five functional scales (physical, role, emotional, social, and cognitive), three symptom scales (fatigue, nausea and vomiting, and pain), a global health status/quality of life scale, and six single items (dyspnea, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea, and financial difficulties). For the Physical Functioning scale, participants rate five items on a four-point scale, with 1 as not at all and 4 as very much. The Physical Functioning Scale scores range from 0 to 100 and were calculated per the EORTC QLQ-C30 Scoring Manual (3rd edition), version 3.0. A high scale score represents high/healthy level of functioning. Positive changes from baseline indicate improvement.
Phase 1: Overall Response RateResponse was assessed at Cycle 2, Day 1, and on Day 1 of every cycle thereafter; estimated median time on follow-up was 8.1 monthsOverall response rate is defined as the percentage of participants with documented best overall response of Partial Response (PR) or better (PR, Very good partial response \[VGPR\], Complete response \[CR\], or Stringent complete response \[sCR\]) per 2011 International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) criteria.
Phase 2: Mean Change From Baseline in Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System [PROMIS] Cancer Fatigue Short Form [SF] ScoreBaseline; Cycle 3, Day 1; Cycle 5, Day 1; Cycle 7, Day 1; Cycle 9, Day 1; Cycle 11, Day 1; Cycle 13, Day 1; Cycle 15, Day 1; Cycle 17, Day 1; Cycle 19, Day 1; Cycle 21, Day 1; Cycle 23, Day 1; Cycle 25, Day 1; Final visitPROMIS Cancer Fatigue SF is a seven item questionnaire that assesses the impact and experience of fatigue over the past 7 days. All questions employ the following five response options: 1 = Not at all, 2 = A little bit, 3 = Somewhat, 4 = Quite a bit, and 5 = Very much. The total raw score is the sum of the responses to each question and is converted to a T-score. The T-score re-scales the total raw score to a standardized score with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10. The \[PROMIS\] Cancer Fatigue Short Form \[SF\] 7a T-Scores range from 29.4 to 83.2, with higher scores indicating more fatigue. Negative changes from baseline indicate improvement.
Phase 2: Mean Change From Baseline in Global Health Status/Quality of Life Scale of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)Baseline; Cycle 3, Day 1; Cycle 5, Day 1; Cycle 7, Day 1; Cycle 9, Day 1; Cycle 11, Day 1; Cycle 13, Day 1; Cycle 15, Day 1; Cycle 17, Day 1; Cycle 19, Day 1; Cycle 21, Day 1; Cycle 23, Day 1; Cycle 25, Day 1; Final visitThe QLQ-C30 is a 30-item subject self-report questionnaire composed of both multi-item and single scales, including five functional scales (physical, role, emotional, social, and cognitive), three symptom scales (fatigue, nausea and vomiting, and pain), a global health status/quality of life scale, and six single items (dyspnea, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea, and financial difficulties). For the Global Health Status/Quality of Life scale, participants rate two items on a seven point scale, with 1 as very poor and 7 as excellent. The Global Health Status/Quality of Life scale ranges from 0 to 100 and was calculated per the EORTC QLQ-C30 Scoring Manual (3rd edition), version 3.0. A high score for the global health status/QoL represents a high QoL. Positive changes from baseline indicate improvement.
Time to Response (TTR)Response was assessed at Cycle 2, Day 1, and on Day 1 of every cycle thereafter; Estimated median time on follow-up was 8.1 months for Phase 1 and 31.7 months for Phase 2TTR is defined as the number of days from the date of first dose of study drug until the date of their first favorable response of Partial Response (PR) or better (PR, Very good partial response \[VGPR\], Complete response \[CR\], or Stringent complete response \[sCR\]) per 2011 International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) criteria (Phase 1) or 2016 IMWG criteria (Phase 2). If a participant did not experience a favorable response, they were to be censored at the date of last adequate assessment. TTR was analyzed by Kaplan- Meier (K-M)\\ methodology.
Time to Progression (TTP)Estimated median duration of follow-up was 8.1 months for Phase 1 and 31.7 months for Phase 2TTP is defined as the number of days from the date of first dose of study drug to the date of first documented disease progression or death due to multiple myeloma, whichever occurs first. TTP was analyzed by Kaplan- Meier (K-M) methodology.
Duration of ResponseAssessed at Cycle 2, Day 1, and on Day 1 of every cycle thereafter; estimated median duration of follow-up was 8.1 months for Phase 1 and 31.7 months for Phase 2DOR is defined as the number of days from the date of first response of Partial Response (PR) or better to the date of first documented disease progression or death due to multiple myeloma, whichever occurs first. DOR was analyzed by Kaplan- Meier (K-M) methodology.
Phase 2: Progression-Free Survival (PFS)Estimated median duration of follow-up was 31.7 monthsPFS is defined as the number of days from the date of the first dose of study treatment to the date of first documented disease progression or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first. PFS was analyzed by Kaplan-Meier methodology.
Phase 2: Overall Survival (OS)Estimated median duration of follow-up was 31.7 monthsOS is defined as the number of days from the date of the first dose of study drug to the date of death due to any cause. If a participant was not known to have died, OS was censored at the last known alive date. The distribution of OS was estimated using Kaplan-Meier methodology.

Countries

Belgium, France, Norway, United States

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

Intent-to-Treat (ITT) population: all participants who received at least one dose of study drug

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Phase 1: Venetoclax 300 mg
Participants in the dose-escalation cohort received 300 mg of venetoclax daily on Days 1 -21 of each cycle after a 2-week lead-in period, during which venetoclax doses were increased weekly.
6
Phase 1: Venetoclax 600 mg
Participants in the dose-escalation cohort received 600 mg of venetoclax daily on Days 1 -21 of each cycle after a 2-week lead-in period, during which venetoclax doses were increased weekly.
9
Phase 1: Venetoclax 900 mg
Participants in the dose-escalation cohort received 900 mg of venetoclax daily on Days 1 -21 of each cycle after a 2-week lead-in period, during which venetoclax doses were increased weekly.
6
Phase 1: Venetoclax 1200 mg
Participants in the dose-escalation cohort received 1200 mg of venetoclax daily on Days 1 -21 of each cycle after a 2-week lead-in period, during which venetoclax doses were increased weekly.
9
Phase 1 Safety Expansion: Venetoclax 1200 mg
Participants in the safety expansion cohort received 1200 mg of venetoclax daily on Days 1 - 21 of each cycle after a 2-week lead-in period, during which venetoclax doses were increased weekly.
36
Phase 1 Combination: Venetoclax 800 mg/Dexamethasone 20 or 40 mg
Participants with t(11;14) translocation multiple myeloma received daily venetoclax at a dose of 800 mg (no lead-in period) on Days 1- 21 of each cycle concomitant with weekly dexamethasone at a dose of 40 mg (20 mg for those aged ≥ 75 years).
20
Phase 2 Expansion: Venetoclax 800 mg/Dexamethasone 20 or 40 mg
The Phase 2 cohort further explored the efficacy of venetoclax in combination with dexamethasone in relapsed or refractory participants with t(11;14) translocation multiple myeloma. Participants received daily venetoclax at a dose of 800 mg (no lead-in period) on Days 1- 21 of each cycle concomitant with weekly dexamethasone at a dose of 40 mg (20 mg for those aged ≥ 75 years).
31
Total117

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003FG004FG005FG006
Overall StudyAdverse event- not related to progression1100200
Overall StudyAdverse events- related to progression0012010
Overall StudyDeath00001022
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up0000100
Overall StudyOther, not specified0011412
Overall StudyProgressive disease562527180
Overall StudyStudy terminated by sponsor0010107
Overall StudyToxicity0200000
Overall StudyWithdrew consent0011000

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPhase 1: Venetoclax 300 mgPhase 1: Venetoclax 600 mgPhase 1: Venetoclax 900 mgPhase 1: Venetoclax 1200 mgPhase 1 Safety Expansion: Venetoclax 1200 mgPhase 1 Combination: Venetoclax 800 mg/Dexamethasone 20 or 40 mgPhase 2 Expansion: Venetoclax 800 mg/Dexamethasone 20 or 40 mgTotal
Age, Continuous62.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.32
63.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.03
61.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.06
67.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.32
60.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.58
63.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.13
64.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.31
63.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.25
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black
0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants2 Participants2 Participants5 Participants11 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Missing
0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants2 Participants0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants5 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Multi Race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Native Hawaiian or other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
6 Participants9 Participants4 Participants6 Participants34 Participants17 Participants24 Participants100 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
1 Participants2 Participants5 Participants5 Participants23 Participants3 Participants13 Participants52 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
5 Participants7 Participants1 Participants4 Participants13 Participants17 Participants18 Participants65 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
EG004
affected / at risk
EG005
affected / at risk
EG006
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
1 / 61 / 91 / 60 / 96 / 361 / 2022 / 31
other
Total, other adverse events
6 / 69 / 96 / 69 / 935 / 3619 / 2027 / 31
serious
Total, serious adverse events
1 / 64 / 93 / 63 / 915 / 366 / 2016 / 31

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Participants With Adverse Events

An adverse event (AE) is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a patient or clinical investigation participant administered a pharmaceutical product which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. The investigator assesses the relationship of each event to the use of study drug. A serious adverse event (SAE) is an event that results in death, is life-threatening, requires or prolongs hospitalization, results in a congenital anomaly, persistent or significant disability/incapacity or is an important medical event that, based on medical judgment, may jeopardize the participant and may require medical or surgical intervention to prevent any of the outcomes listed above. Treatment-emergent adverse events/treatment-emergent serious adverse events (TEAEs/TESAEs) are defined as any event that began or worsened in severity on or after the first dose of study drug.

Time frame: From first dose of study drug until 30 days following last dose of study drug (up to 2482 days)

Population: Safety population: all participants who received at least one dose of study drug

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Phase 1: Venetoclax 300 mgNumber of Participants With Adverse EventsTESAE1 Participants
Phase 1: Venetoclax 300 mgNumber of Participants With Adverse EventsAny TEAE6 Participants
Phase 1: Venetoclax 600 mgNumber of Participants With Adverse EventsTESAE4 Participants
Phase 1: Venetoclax 600 mgNumber of Participants With Adverse EventsAny TEAE9 Participants
Phase 1: Venetoclax 900 mgNumber of Participants With Adverse EventsTESAE3 Participants
Phase 1: Venetoclax 900 mgNumber of Participants With Adverse EventsAny TEAE6 Participants
Phase 1: Venetoclax 1200 mgNumber of Participants With Adverse EventsAny TEAE9 Participants
Phase 1: Venetoclax 1200 mgNumber of Participants With Adverse EventsTESAE3 Participants
Phase 1 Safety Expansion: Venetoclax 1200 mgNumber of Participants With Adverse EventsAny TEAE36 Participants
Phase 1 Safety Expansion: Venetoclax 1200 mgNumber of Participants With Adverse EventsTESAE15 Participants
Phase 1 Combination: Venetoclax 800 mg/Dexamethasone 20 or 40 mgNumber of Participants With Adverse EventsAny TEAE19 Participants
Phase 1 Combination: Venetoclax 800 mg/Dexamethasone 20 or 40 mgNumber of Participants With Adverse EventsTESAE6 Participants
Phase 2 Expansion: Venetoclax 800 mg/Dexamethasone 20 or 40 mgNumber of Participants With Adverse EventsTESAE16 Participants
Phase 2 Expansion: Venetoclax 800 mg/Dexamethasone 20 or 40 mgNumber of Participants With Adverse EventsAny TEAE30 Participants
Primary

Phase 1: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve Over Time From 0 to 24 Hours (AUC0-24) of Venetoclax

AUC is a measure of how long and how much drug is present in the body after dosing.

Time frame: Cycle 2, Day 1 at predose, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 24 hours postdose (dose escalation cohort); (1200 mg dose): Cycle 2, Day 1 at predose (safety expansion cohort, 1200 mg dose)

Population: Phase 1 dose escalation and safety expansion participants with available data

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Phase 1: Venetoclax 300 mgPhase 1: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve Over Time From 0 to 24 Hours (AUC0-24) of Venetoclax13.0 µg•h/mLStandard Deviation 8.31
Phase 1: Venetoclax 600 mgPhase 1: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve Over Time From 0 to 24 Hours (AUC0-24) of Venetoclax38.2 µg•h/mLStandard Deviation 25.1
Phase 1: Venetoclax 900 mgPhase 1: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve Over Time From 0 to 24 Hours (AUC0-24) of Venetoclax26.3 µg•h/mLStandard Deviation 20.1
Phase 1: Venetoclax 1200 mgPhase 1: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve Over Time From 0 to 24 Hours (AUC0-24) of Venetoclax71.5 µg•h/mLStandard Deviation 35.8
Primary

Phase 1: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Venetoclax

Cmax is the highest concentration that a drug achieves in the blood after administration in a dosing interval.

Time frame: Cycle 2, Day 1 at predose, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 24 hours postdose

Population: Phase 1 dose escalation and safety expansion participants with available data

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Phase 1: Venetoclax 300 mgPhase 1: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Venetoclax0.897 µg/mLStandard Deviation 0.593
Phase 1: Venetoclax 600 mgPhase 1: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Venetoclax2.56 µg/mLStandard Deviation 1.77
Phase 1: Venetoclax 900 mgPhase 1: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Venetoclax1.85 µg/mLStandard Deviation 1.3
Phase 1: Venetoclax 1200 mgPhase 1: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Venetoclax4.16 µg/mLStandard Deviation 1.52
Primary

Phase 1: Time to Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of Venetoclax

Tmax is the the time at which the maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) is observed.

Time frame: Cycle 2, Day 1 at predose, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 24 hours postdose

Population: Phase 1 dose escalation and safety expansion participants with available data

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Phase 1: Venetoclax 300 mgPhase 1: Time to Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of Venetoclax5.0 hours
Phase 1: Venetoclax 600 mgPhase 1: Time to Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of Venetoclax8.0 hours
Phase 1: Venetoclax 900 mgPhase 1: Time to Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of Venetoclax6.0 hours
Phase 1: Venetoclax 1200 mgPhase 1: Time to Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of Venetoclax6.1 hours
Primary

Phase 2: Overall Response Rate

Overall response rate is defined as the percentage of participants with documented best overall response of Partial Response (PR) or better (PR, Very good partial response \[VGPR\], Complete response \[CR\], or Stringent complete response \[sCR\]) per 2016 standard International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) criteria.

Time frame: Response was assessed at Cycle 2, Day 1, and on Day 1 of every cycle thereafter; estimated median time on follow-up was 31.7 months

Population: All enrolled Phase 2 participants who received venetoclax and had active disease at baseline; primary efficacy endpoints were pre-specified for Phase 2 only, and are reported for all participants with available data

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Phase 1: Venetoclax 300 mgPhase 2: Overall Response Rate48.4 percentage of participants
Primary

Phase 2: Very Good Partial Response Rate or Better

The percentage of participants with documented best overall response of Very Good Partial Response (VGPR) or better (VGPR, Complete response \[CR\], or Stringent complete response \[sCR\]) per 2016 standard International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) criteria was computed.

Time frame: Response was assessed at Cycle 2, Day 1, and on Day 1 of every cycle thereafter; estimated median time on follow-up was 31.7 months

Population: All enrolled Phase 2 participants who received venetoclax and had active disease at baseline; primary efficacy endpoints were pre-specified for Phase 2 only, and are reported for all participants with available data

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Phase 1: Venetoclax 300 mgPhase 2: Very Good Partial Response Rate or Better35.5 percentage of participants
Secondary

Duration of Response

DOR is defined as the number of days from the date of first response of Partial Response (PR) or better to the date of first documented disease progression or death due to multiple myeloma, whichever occurs first. DOR was analyzed by Kaplan- Meier (K-M) methodology.

Time frame: Assessed at Cycle 2, Day 1, and on Day 1 of every cycle thereafter; estimated median duration of follow-up was 8.1 months for Phase 1 and 31.7 months for Phase 2

Population: All enrolled participants who received venetoclax, had active disease at baseline, and achieved a response of PR or better

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Phase 1: Venetoclax 600 mgDuration of Response9.7 months
Phase 1: Venetoclax 900 mgDuration of ResponseNA months
Phase 1 Safety Expansion: Venetoclax 1200 mgDuration of Response17.3 months
Phase 1 Combination: Venetoclax 800 mg/Dexamethasone 20 or 40 mgDuration of Response13.1 months
Phase 2 Expansion: Venetoclax 800 mg/Dexamethasone 20 or 40 mgDuration of Response17.5 months
Secondary

Phase 1: Overall Response Rate

Overall response rate is defined as the percentage of participants with documented best overall response of Partial Response (PR) or better (PR, Very good partial response \[VGPR\], Complete response \[CR\], or Stringent complete response \[sCR\]) per 2011 International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) criteria.

Time frame: Response was assessed at Cycle 2, Day 1, and on Day 1 of every cycle thereafter; estimated median time on follow-up was 8.1 months

Population: All enrolled Phase 1 participants who had active disease at baseline and received venetoclax

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Phase 1: Venetoclax 300 mgPhase 1: Overall Response Rate0 percentage of participants
Phase 1: Venetoclax 600 mgPhase 1: Overall Response Rate11.1 percentage of participants
Phase 1: Venetoclax 900 mgPhase 1: Overall Response Rate16.7 percentage of participants
Phase 1: Venetoclax 1200 mgPhase 1: Overall Response Rate0 percentage of participants
Phase 1 Safety Expansion: Venetoclax 1200 mgPhase 1: Overall Response Rate36.1 percentage of participants
Phase 1 Combination: Venetoclax 800 mg/Dexamethasone 20 or 40 mgPhase 1: Overall Response Rate65.0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Phase 2: Mean Change From Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory - Short Form (BPI-SF) Worst Pain

The BPI-SF is a pain-specific measure developed to assess patient-reported severity (or intensity) of pain (4 items) and the impact of pain on daily functioning (7 items) in patients with cancer pain. The four pain severity items assess pain at its worst in last 24 hours, least in last 24 hours, average, and now (current pain). For these items, participants are asked to rate their pain on an 11-point numeric rating scale with anchors of 0 (no pain) and 10 (pain as bad as you can imagine). The Worst Pain scores range from 0 to 10, with higher scores indicating severe pain. Negative changes from baseline indicate improvement.

Time frame: Baseline; Cycle 3, Day 1; Cycle 5, Day 1; Cycle 7, Day 1; Cycle 9, Day 1; Cycle 11, Day 1; Cycle 13, Day 1; Cycle 15, Day 1; Cycle 17, Day 1; Cycle 19, Day 1; Cycle 21, Day 1; Cycle 23, Day 1; Cycle 25, Day 1; Final visit

Population: Intent-to-Treat (ITT) population: all participants who received at least one dose of study drug; participants who have both baseline and post-baseline values are included in the analysis at each visit

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Phase 1: Venetoclax 300 mgPhase 2: Mean Change From Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory - Short Form (BPI-SF) Worst PainCycle 3, Day 10.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.47
Phase 1: Venetoclax 300 mgPhase 2: Mean Change From Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory - Short Form (BPI-SF) Worst PainCycle 5, Day 1-0.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.43
Phase 1: Venetoclax 300 mgPhase 2: Mean Change From Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory - Short Form (BPI-SF) Worst PainCycle 7, Day 1-0.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.2
Phase 1: Venetoclax 300 mgPhase 2: Mean Change From Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory - Short Form (BPI-SF) Worst PainCycle 9, Day 1-0.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.46
Phase 1: Venetoclax 300 mgPhase 2: Mean Change From Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory - Short Form (BPI-SF) Worst PainCycle 11, Day 1-1.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.62
Phase 1: Venetoclax 300 mgPhase 2: Mean Change From Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory - Short Form (BPI-SF) Worst PainCycle 13, Day 10.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.84
Phase 1: Venetoclax 300 mgPhase 2: Mean Change From Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory - Short Form (BPI-SF) Worst PainCycle 15, Day 1-0.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.27
Phase 1: Venetoclax 300 mgPhase 2: Mean Change From Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory - Short Form (BPI-SF) Worst PainCycle 17, Day 1-1.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.29
Phase 1: Venetoclax 300 mgPhase 2: Mean Change From Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory - Short Form (BPI-SF) Worst PainCycle 19, Day 1-1.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2
Phase 1: Venetoclax 300 mgPhase 2: Mean Change From Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory - Short Form (BPI-SF) Worst PainCycle 21, Day 1-1.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.3
Phase 1: Venetoclax 300 mgPhase 2: Mean Change From Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory - Short Form (BPI-SF) Worst PainCycle 23, Day 1-1.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.3
Phase 1: Venetoclax 300 mgPhase 2: Mean Change From Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory - Short Form (BPI-SF) Worst PainCycle 25, Day 1-3.8 units on a scale
Phase 1: Venetoclax 300 mgPhase 2: Mean Change From Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory - Short Form (BPI-SF) Worst PainFinal visit-0.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.86
Secondary

Phase 2: Mean Change From Baseline in Global Health Status/Quality of Life Scale of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)

The QLQ-C30 is a 30-item subject self-report questionnaire composed of both multi-item and single scales, including five functional scales (physical, role, emotional, social, and cognitive), three symptom scales (fatigue, nausea and vomiting, and pain), a global health status/quality of life scale, and six single items (dyspnea, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea, and financial difficulties). For the Global Health Status/Quality of Life scale, participants rate two items on a seven point scale, with 1 as very poor and 7 as excellent. The Global Health Status/Quality of Life scale ranges from 0 to 100 and was calculated per the EORTC QLQ-C30 Scoring Manual (3rd edition), version 3.0. A high score for the global health status/QoL represents a high QoL. Positive changes from baseline indicate improvement.

Time frame: Baseline; Cycle 3, Day 1; Cycle 5, Day 1; Cycle 7, Day 1; Cycle 9, Day 1; Cycle 11, Day 1; Cycle 13, Day 1; Cycle 15, Day 1; Cycle 17, Day 1; Cycle 19, Day 1; Cycle 21, Day 1; Cycle 23, Day 1; Cycle 25, Day 1; Final visit

Population: Intent-to-Treat (ITT) population: all participants who received at least one dose of study drug; participants who have both baseline and post-baseline values are included in the analysis at each visit

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Phase 1: Venetoclax 300 mgPhase 2: Mean Change From Baseline in Global Health Status/Quality of Life Scale of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)Cycle 3, Day 1-5.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 25.44
Phase 1: Venetoclax 300 mgPhase 2: Mean Change From Baseline in Global Health Status/Quality of Life Scale of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)Cycle 5, Day 16.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.27
Phase 1: Venetoclax 300 mgPhase 2: Mean Change From Baseline in Global Health Status/Quality of Life Scale of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)Cycle 7, Day 13.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.63
Phase 1: Venetoclax 300 mgPhase 2: Mean Change From Baseline in Global Health Status/Quality of Life Scale of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)Cycle 9, Day 18.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.79
Phase 1: Venetoclax 300 mgPhase 2: Mean Change From Baseline in Global Health Status/Quality of Life Scale of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)Cycle 11, Day 10.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.79
Phase 1: Venetoclax 300 mgPhase 2: Mean Change From Baseline in Global Health Status/Quality of Life Scale of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)Cycle 13, Day 1-6.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.3
Phase 1: Venetoclax 300 mgPhase 2: Mean Change From Baseline in Global Health Status/Quality of Life Scale of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)Cycle 15, Day 14.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.13
Phase 1: Venetoclax 300 mgPhase 2: Mean Change From Baseline in Global Health Status/Quality of Life Scale of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)Cycle 17, Day 1-1.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.27
Phase 1: Venetoclax 300 mgPhase 2: Mean Change From Baseline in Global Health Status/Quality of Life Scale of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)Cycle 19, Day 1-19.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.81
Phase 1: Venetoclax 300 mgPhase 2: Mean Change From Baseline in Global Health Status/Quality of Life Scale of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)Cycle 21, Day 1-33.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.57
Phase 1: Venetoclax 300 mgPhase 2: Mean Change From Baseline in Global Health Status/Quality of Life Scale of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)Cycle 23, Day 1-8.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
Phase 1: Venetoclax 300 mgPhase 2: Mean Change From Baseline in Global Health Status/Quality of Life Scale of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)Cycle 25, Day 1-8.3 units on a scale
Phase 1: Venetoclax 300 mgPhase 2: Mean Change From Baseline in Global Health Status/Quality of Life Scale of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)Final visit-11.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.55
Secondary

Phase 2: Mean Change From Baseline in Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System [PROMIS] Cancer Fatigue Short Form [SF] Score

PROMIS Cancer Fatigue SF is a seven item questionnaire that assesses the impact and experience of fatigue over the past 7 days. All questions employ the following five response options: 1 = Not at all, 2 = A little bit, 3 = Somewhat, 4 = Quite a bit, and 5 = Very much. The total raw score is the sum of the responses to each question and is converted to a T-score. The T-score re-scales the total raw score to a standardized score with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10. The \[PROMIS\] Cancer Fatigue Short Form \[SF\] 7a T-Scores range from 29.4 to 83.2, with higher scores indicating more fatigue. Negative changes from baseline indicate improvement.

Time frame: Baseline; Cycle 3, Day 1; Cycle 5, Day 1; Cycle 7, Day 1; Cycle 9, Day 1; Cycle 11, Day 1; Cycle 13, Day 1; Cycle 15, Day 1; Cycle 17, Day 1; Cycle 19, Day 1; Cycle 21, Day 1; Cycle 23, Day 1; Cycle 25, Day 1; Final visit

Population: Intent-to-Treat (ITT) population: all participants who received at least one dose of study drug; participants who have both baseline and post-baseline values are included in the analysis at each visit

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Phase 1: Venetoclax 300 mgPhase 2: Mean Change From Baseline in Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System [PROMIS] Cancer Fatigue Short Form [SF] ScoreCycle 7, Day 1-1.8 T-scoreStandard Deviation 4.21
Phase 1: Venetoclax 300 mgPhase 2: Mean Change From Baseline in Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System [PROMIS] Cancer Fatigue Short Form [SF] ScoreCycle 9, Day 1-1.6 T-scoreStandard Deviation 4.85
Phase 1: Venetoclax 300 mgPhase 2: Mean Change From Baseline in Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System [PROMIS] Cancer Fatigue Short Form [SF] ScoreCycle 3, Day 10.6 T-scoreStandard Deviation 5.88
Phase 1: Venetoclax 300 mgPhase 2: Mean Change From Baseline in Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System [PROMIS] Cancer Fatigue Short Form [SF] ScoreCycle 5, Day 1-2.9 T-scoreStandard Deviation 5.3
Phase 1: Venetoclax 300 mgPhase 2: Mean Change From Baseline in Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System [PROMIS] Cancer Fatigue Short Form [SF] ScoreCycle 11, Day 10.1 T-scoreStandard Deviation 7.24
Phase 1: Venetoclax 300 mgPhase 2: Mean Change From Baseline in Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System [PROMIS] Cancer Fatigue Short Form [SF] ScoreCycle 13, Day 11.0 T-scoreStandard Deviation 4.54
Phase 1: Venetoclax 300 mgPhase 2: Mean Change From Baseline in Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System [PROMIS] Cancer Fatigue Short Form [SF] ScoreCycle 15, Day 1-3.4 T-scoreStandard Deviation 5.69
Phase 1: Venetoclax 300 mgPhase 2: Mean Change From Baseline in Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System [PROMIS] Cancer Fatigue Short Form [SF] ScoreCycle 17, Day 10.6 T-scoreStandard Deviation 7.36
Phase 1: Venetoclax 300 mgPhase 2: Mean Change From Baseline in Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System [PROMIS] Cancer Fatigue Short Form [SF] ScoreCycle 19, Day 16.6 T-scoreStandard Deviation 2.25
Phase 1: Venetoclax 300 mgPhase 2: Mean Change From Baseline in Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System [PROMIS] Cancer Fatigue Short Form [SF] ScoreCycle 21, Day 111.6 T-scoreStandard Deviation 6.51
Phase 1: Venetoclax 300 mgPhase 2: Mean Change From Baseline in Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System [PROMIS] Cancer Fatigue Short Form [SF] ScoreCycle 23, Day 16.0 T-scoreStandard Deviation 0.57
Phase 1: Venetoclax 300 mgPhase 2: Mean Change From Baseline in Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System [PROMIS] Cancer Fatigue Short Form [SF] ScoreCycle 25, Day 15.6 T-score
Phase 1: Venetoclax 300 mgPhase 2: Mean Change From Baseline in Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System [PROMIS] Cancer Fatigue Short Form [SF] ScoreFinal visit1.4 T-scoreStandard Deviation 6.51
Secondary

Phase 2: Mean Change From Baseline in Physical Functioning Scale of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)

The QLQ-C30 is a 30-item subject self-report questionnaire composed of both multi-item and single scales, including five functional scales (physical, role, emotional, social, and cognitive), three symptom scales (fatigue, nausea and vomiting, and pain), a global health status/quality of life scale, and six single items (dyspnea, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea, and financial difficulties). For the Physical Functioning scale, participants rate five items on a four-point scale, with 1 as not at all and 4 as very much. The Physical Functioning Scale scores range from 0 to 100 and were calculated per the EORTC QLQ-C30 Scoring Manual (3rd edition), version 3.0. A high scale score represents high/healthy level of functioning. Positive changes from baseline indicate improvement.

Time frame: Baseline; Cycle 3, Day 1; Cycle 5, Day 1; Cycle 7, Day 1; Cycle 9, Day 1; Cycle 11, Day 1; Cycle 13, Day 1; Cycle 15, Day 1; Cycle 17, Day 1; Cycle 19, Day 1; Cycle 21, Day 1; Cycle 23, Day 1; Cycle 25, Day 1; Final visit

Population: Intent-to-Treat (ITT) population: all participants who received at least one dose of study drug; participants who have both baseline and post-baseline values are included in the analysis at each visit

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Phase 1: Venetoclax 300 mgPhase 2: Mean Change From Baseline in Physical Functioning Scale of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)Cycle 3, Day 1-3.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.9
Phase 1: Venetoclax 300 mgPhase 2: Mean Change From Baseline in Physical Functioning Scale of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)Cycle 5, Day 14.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.78
Phase 1: Venetoclax 300 mgPhase 2: Mean Change From Baseline in Physical Functioning Scale of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)Cycle 7, Day 18.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.13
Phase 1: Venetoclax 300 mgPhase 2: Mean Change From Baseline in Physical Functioning Scale of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)Cycle 9, Day 18.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.13
Phase 1: Venetoclax 300 mgPhase 2: Mean Change From Baseline in Physical Functioning Scale of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)Cycle 11, Day 115.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.97
Phase 1: Venetoclax 300 mgPhase 2: Mean Change From Baseline in Physical Functioning Scale of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)Cycle 13, Day 111.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.76
Phase 1: Venetoclax 300 mgPhase 2: Mean Change From Baseline in Physical Functioning Scale of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)Cycle 15, Day 114.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.17
Phase 1: Venetoclax 300 mgPhase 2: Mean Change From Baseline in Physical Functioning Scale of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)Cycle 17, Day 18.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.11
Phase 1: Venetoclax 300 mgPhase 2: Mean Change From Baseline in Physical Functioning Scale of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)Cycle 19, Day 1-0.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.55
Phase 1: Venetoclax 300 mgPhase 2: Mean Change From Baseline in Physical Functioning Scale of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)Cycle 21, Day 1-13.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 28.28
Phase 1: Venetoclax 300 mgPhase 2: Mean Change From Baseline in Physical Functioning Scale of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)Cycle 23, Day 1-3.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.14
Phase 1: Venetoclax 300 mgPhase 2: Mean Change From Baseline in Physical Functioning Scale of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)Cycle 25, Day 16.7 units on a scale
Phase 1: Venetoclax 300 mgPhase 2: Mean Change From Baseline in Physical Functioning Scale of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)Final visit-5.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.4
Secondary

Phase 2: Overall Survival (OS)

OS is defined as the number of days from the date of the first dose of study drug to the date of death due to any cause. If a participant was not known to have died, OS was censored at the last known alive date. The distribution of OS was estimated using Kaplan-Meier methodology.

Time frame: Estimated median duration of follow-up was 31.7 months

Population: All enrolled Phase 2 participants who received venetoclax; this endpoint was pre-specified for Phase 2 only, data are reported for all participants with available data

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Phase 1: Venetoclax 300 mgPhase 2: Overall Survival (OS)18.4 months
Secondary

Phase 2: Progression-Free Survival (PFS)

PFS is defined as the number of days from the date of the first dose of study treatment to the date of first documented disease progression or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first. PFS was analyzed by Kaplan-Meier methodology.

Time frame: Estimated median duration of follow-up was 31.7 months

Population: All enrolled Phase 2 participants who received venetoclax and had active disease at baseline; this endpoint was pre-specified for Phase 2 only, data are reported for all participants with available data

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Phase 1: Venetoclax 300 mgPhase 2: Progression-Free Survival (PFS)11.2 months
Secondary

Time to Progression (TTP)

TTP is defined as the number of days from the date of first dose of study drug to the date of first documented disease progression or death due to multiple myeloma, whichever occurs first. TTP was analyzed by Kaplan- Meier (K-M) methodology.

Time frame: Estimated median duration of follow-up was 8.1 months for Phase 1 and 31.7 months for Phase 2

Population: All enrolled participants who received venetoclax

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Phase 1: Venetoclax 300 mgTime to Progression (TTP)5.0 months
Phase 1: Venetoclax 600 mgTime to Progression (TTP)2.0 months
Phase 1: Venetoclax 900 mgTime to Progression (TTP)1.2 months
Phase 1: Venetoclax 1200 mgTime to Progression (TTP)1.9 months
Phase 1 Safety Expansion: Venetoclax 1200 mgTime to Progression (TTP)4.2 months
Phase 1 Combination: Venetoclax 800 mg/Dexamethasone 20 or 40 mgTime to Progression (TTP)12.2 months
Phase 2 Expansion: Venetoclax 800 mg/Dexamethasone 20 or 40 mgTime to Progression (TTP)11.2 months
Secondary

Time to Response (TTR)

TTR is defined as the number of days from the date of first dose of study drug until the date of their first favorable response of Partial Response (PR) or better (PR, Very good partial response \[VGPR\], Complete response \[CR\], or Stringent complete response \[sCR\]) per 2011 International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) criteria (Phase 1) or 2016 IMWG criteria (Phase 2). If a participant did not experience a favorable response, they were to be censored at the date of last adequate assessment. TTR was analyzed by Kaplan- Meier (K-M)\\ methodology.

Time frame: Response was assessed at Cycle 2, Day 1, and on Day 1 of every cycle thereafter; Estimated median time on follow-up was 8.1 months for Phase 1 and 31.7 months for Phase 2

Population: All enrolled participants who received venetoclax, had active disease at baseline, and achieved a response (PR or better)

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Phase 1: Venetoclax 600 mgTime to Response (TTR)NA months
Phase 1: Venetoclax 900 mgTime to Response (TTR)NA months
Phase 1 Safety Expansion: Venetoclax 1200 mgTime to Response (TTR)9.0 months
Phase 1 Combination: Venetoclax 800 mg/Dexamethasone 20 or 40 mgTime to Response (TTR)2.6 months
Phase 2 Expansion: Venetoclax 800 mg/Dexamethasone 20 or 40 mgTime to Response (TTR)0.8 months

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 4, 2026