Skip to content

The Senior Step Study How Elderly Help Themselves Maximally Forward

The Senior Step Study: How Elderly Help Themselves Maximally Forward

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01792180
Acronym
SSS
Enrollment
150
Registered
2013-02-15
Start date
2013-01-31
Completion date
2017-04-01
Last updated
2018-08-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Self-management for Mobility Improvement in the Elderly

Keywords

Gait speed, Mobility, Falls, Fall risk, Self-management, Mental wellbeing, Elderly

Brief summary

The Senior Step Study investigates whether feedback given by a mobility feedback device in combination with an instruction book containing every day exercises, motivates elderly to exercise more. By exercising more participants take charge of their own mobility and fall risk. Senior Step Study studies whether this 'exercising more' positively affects their mobility, fall risk, mental wellbeing, self-management, and quality of life.

Detailed description

Falling is an important problem among community-dwelling elderly. The number of falls and concomitant health costs will rise within an aging population. Fall related injuries and fear of falling decrease mobility and have a negative impact on social functioning, mood, wellbeing and autonomy. Research from a medical perspective has concentrated on case finding and fall prevention. Currently, insufficient possibilities are available for elderly and caregiver to asses and improve their own mobility and fall risk. The Senior Step Study aims to provide a tool for elderly to improve their self-management abilities in monitoring and improving mobility and fall risk. The researchers expect that elderly in the intervention group will be more aware of their own mobility and fall risk, and will therefore experience more autonomy, better mental wellbeing, and better quality of life. We expect this to reflect in less demands made on healthcare by the elderly. 150 elderly living at home, in a home for the elderly, and elderly who regularly attend activities in a community home, are asked to participate in the study. During the six months of the study, subjects will receive weekly telephone calls from the computerized falls telephone. The intervention group will measure their normal gait speed measured over 4 meters, using the mobility feedback device once a week, and use the feedback given by this mobility feedback device to perform exercises from the instruction book. Activity diaries allow them to register the type and duration of the exercises.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALMobility feedback device with use of instruction book

Weekly use of the mobility feedback device to measure gait speed. Two infrared sensors will be placed in the line of walking, a photo frame containing a display, symbols and lights will tell the participant when and how to perform the test. Gait speed is shown on the display and will serve as feedback to the participant. Participant can use their gait speed to decide which exercises from the instruction book he performs. Participants will be asked to keep an activity diary.

Sponsors

ZonMw: The Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development
CollaboratorOTHER
Radboud University Medical Center
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
SINGLE (Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
70 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Subjects of 70 years and over * Subjects who experienced at least 1 fall in the previous 12 months * Subjects who can walk independently or with a walking aid * Informed consent on the basis of Dutch legislation (WMO) * During the study subjects cannot participate in a falls prevention course

Exclusion criteria

* Subjects not able to speak Dutch * Subjects not able to understand and remember simple Dutch instructions * Subjects not capable of using the falls telephone, and do not have an informal caregiver who can answer the falls telephone for them

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mental wellbeingBaseline to 3 monthsMedical Outcomes Study (MOS-20)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of fallsBaseline to 6 monthsComputerized falls telephone system
Self-managementBaseline to 3 months, baseline to 6 monthsSelf-Management Ability Scale (SMAS-30)
Physical activityBaseline to 3 months, baseline to 6 monthsLASA Physical Activity Questionnaire (LAPAQ)
Balance and mobilityBaseline to 3 months, baseline to 6 monthsShort Physical Perfomance Battery, Timed Up and Go
Mental WellbeingBaseline to 6 monthsMedical Outcomes Study (MOS-20)
Fear of fallingBaseline to 3 months, baseline to 6 monthsFalls Efficacy Scale (FES-I)

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Compliance and motivation using the interventionBaseline to 6 monthsQualitative research using semi-structured interviews

Countries

Netherlands

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026