Skip to content

Safety and Performance Study of the Siello S Pacing Lead

Status
Terminated
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01791127
Acronym
SIELLO
Enrollment
1758
Registered
2013-02-13
Start date
2013-03-13
Completion date
2019-04-17
Last updated
2020-06-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Safety and Effectiveness of the Siello S Lead

Brief summary

The objective of the SIELLO study is to demonstrate the safety and effectiveness of the BIOTRONIK Siello S pacing lead.

Interventions

DEVICEmarket-released BIOTRONIK pacemaker system including one or two Siello S leads.

Sponsors

Biotronik, Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Observational model
CASE_ONLY
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Candidate for de novo implantation of a BIOTRONIK pacemaker system, including one or two Siello S leads. Candidate meets recommendation for pacemaker system implant put forth by guidelines of relevant professional societies. * Able to understand the nature of the study and provide informed consent. * Available for follow-up visits on a regular basis at the investigational site for the expected 5 years of follow-up. * Age greater than or equal to 18 years.

Exclusion criteria

* Enrolled in any other investigational clinical study. * Currently implanted with a pacemaker or ICD device. * Planned cardiac surgical procedures or interventional measures within the next 6 months. * Expected to receive a heart transplant within 1 year. * Life expectancy less than 1 year. * Presence of another life-threatening, underlying illness separate from their cardiac disorder. * Pregnant at the time of enrollment.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Atrial Siello S Lead Safety at 12 Months12 monthThe overall percentage subjects with adverse events that require additional invasive intervention to resolve, related to the Siello leads implanted in the atrium with a BIOTRONIK Evia pacemaker device through 12 months follow-up. This was evaluated as an adverse event free-rate (AEFR).
Ventricular Siello S Lead Safety at 12 Months12-monthThe overall percentage of subjects with adverse events that require additional invasive intervention to resolve, related to the Siello leads implanted in the ventricle with a BIOTRONIK Evia pacemaker device through 12 months follow-up. This was evaluated as an adverse event free-rate (AEFR).
Siello S Lead Effectiveness at 12 Months12-monthsSuccess rate of the implanted system to sense and deliver pacing at 12-months post implant.
Ventricular Siello S Lead Safety at 5 Years5-YearsThe overall percentage of subjects with adverse events that require additional invasive intervention to resolve, related to the Siello leads implanted in the ventricle with a BIOTRONIK Evia pacemaker device through 5 years follow-up. This was evaluated as an adverse event free-rate (AEFR).
Ventricular Siello S Lead Safety at 5 Years - Individual Adverse Event Rates5-yearsEvaluation of the individual adverse events contributing to the outcome measure 'Ventricular Siello S Lead Safety at 5 Years'.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants With Other Adverse Events5-yearsThe overall percentage of subjects with reportable adverse events that were excluded from primary and secondary objectives and occurred through 5 years of follow-up. This was evaluated as an adverse event free-rate (AEFR). Adverse events were considered reportable if the event was related to the implant procedure, implanted pulse generator, or implanted leads.
Siello S Lead Effectiveness at 5 Years5-yearsSuccess rate of the implanted system to deliver long-term pacing at 5-years post-implant.
Atrial Siello S Lead Safety at 5 Years5-yearsThe overall percentage of subjects with adverse events that require additional invasive intervention to resolve, related to the Siello leads implanted in the atrium with a BIOTRONIK Evia pacemaker device through 5 years follow-up. This was evaluated as an adverse event free-rate (AEFR).
Sensing Measurements for Siello S Leads Through 5 Years5-yearsSensing measurements for Siello S leads implanted in the atrium or ventricle through the 5 year follow-up visit.
Impedance Measurements for Siello S Leads Through 5 Years5-yearsImpedance measurements for Siello S leads implanted in the atrium or ventricle through the 5 year follow-up visit.
Pacing Threshold Measurements for Siello S Leads Through 5 Years5-yearsPacing threshold measurements for Siello S leads implanted in the atrium or ventricle through 5 years of follow-up.
Atrial Siello S Lead Safety at 5 Years - Individual Adverse Event Rates5-yearsEvaluation of the individual adverse events contributing to the outcome measure 'Atrial Siello S Lead Safety at 5 Years'.
Pacing Threshold Measurements for Siello S Leads at 12 Months12-monthsPacing threshold measurements for Siello S leads implanted in the atrium or ventricle at the 12 month follow-up visit.
Sensing Measurements for Siello S Leads at 12 Months12-monthsSensing measurements for Siello S leads implanted in the atrium or ventricle at the 12 month follow-up visit.
Impedance Measurements for Siello S Leads at 12 Months12-monthsImpedance measurements for Siello S leads implanted in the atrium or ventricle at the 12 month follow-up visit.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
BIOTRONIK Siello S Lead
Patients with a BIOTRONIK pacemaker system including one or two Siello S leads.
1,758
Total1,758

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyAll Siello leads are explanted31
Overall StudyCompletion of 30 day safety registry1
Overall StudyDeath356
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up42
Overall StudyPatient has withdrawn from study293
Overall StudyStudy terminated for EP Passion749

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicBIOTRONIK Siello S Lead
Age, Continuous74.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.9
Height66.9 inches
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.3
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
American Indian or Alaska Native
2 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
22 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black or African American
112 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Hispanic or Latino
47 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
2 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Not Reported
193 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
1380 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
1758 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
821 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
937 Participants
Weight187.8 pounds
STANDARD_DEVIATION 51.6

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
356 / 1,758
other
Total, other adverse events
154 / 1,758
serious
Total, serious adverse events
145 / 1,758

Outcome results

Primary

Atrial Siello S Lead Safety at 12 Months

The overall percentage subjects with adverse events that require additional invasive intervention to resolve, related to the Siello leads implanted in the atrium with a BIOTRONIK Evia pacemaker device through 12 months follow-up. This was evaluated as an adverse event free-rate (AEFR).

Time frame: 12 month

Population: The Pre-Market cohort was defined as the population of subjects who were implanted (or had an implant attempt) of an atrial Siello lead on or before the implant date of the last subject to reach the 12-month follow-up time point as of April 3, 2015 and/or experienced a qualifying event.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
BIOTRONIK Siello S Atrial LeadAtrial Siello S Lead Safety at 12 Months100 percentage of participants
p-value: <0.0001Exact, binomial
Primary

Siello S Lead Effectiveness at 12 Months

Success rate of the implanted system to sense and deliver pacing at 12-months post implant.

Time frame: 12-months

Population: The Pre-Market cohort was defined as the population of subjects who were implanted (or had an implant attempt) of one or more Siello leads on or before the implant date of the last subject to reach the 12-month follow-up time point as of April 3, 2015 and/or experienced a qualifying event.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
BIOTRONIK Siello S Atrial LeadSiello S Lead Effectiveness at 12 Months100 percentage of participants
Comparison: The primary endpoint 3 hypothesis was evaluated by performing an exact, binomial test comparing a binomial proportion (successful sensing and pacing rate at 12 months) to 97.0%, with Type I error (alpha) or 0.025 and power of 80%.p-value: <0.0001Exact, binomial
Primary

Ventricular Siello S Lead Safety at 12 Months

The overall percentage of subjects with adverse events that require additional invasive intervention to resolve, related to the Siello leads implanted in the ventricle with a BIOTRONIK Evia pacemaker device through 12 months follow-up. This was evaluated as an adverse event free-rate (AEFR).

Time frame: 12-month

Population: The Pre-Market cohort was defined as the population of subjects who were implanted (or had an implant attempt) of a ventricular Siello lead on or before the implant date of the last subject to reach the 12-month follow-up time point as of April 3, 2015 and/or experienced a qualifying event.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
BIOTRONIK Siello S Atrial LeadVentricular Siello S Lead Safety at 12 Months99.62 percentage of participants
Comparison: The primary endpoint 2 hypothesis was evaluated by performing an exact, binomial test comparing a binomial proportion (AEFR at 12 months) to 94.0%, with Type I error (alpha) or 0.025 and power of 80%.p-value: <0.0001Exact, binomial
Primary

Ventricular Siello S Lead Safety at 5 Years

The overall percentage of subjects with adverse events that require additional invasive intervention to resolve, related to the Siello leads implanted in the ventricle with a BIOTRONIK Evia pacemaker device through 5 years follow-up. This was evaluated as an adverse event free-rate (AEFR).

Time frame: 5-Years

Population: The Post-Market cohort included all patient who were enrolled in the study and had a Siello lead implanted in the right ventricular position.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
BIOTRONIK Siello S Atrial LeadVentricular Siello S Lead Safety at 5 Years99.71 percentage of participants
Comparison: The primary endpoint 4 hypothesis was evaluated by performing an exact, binomial test comparing a binomial proportion (AEFR at 5 years) to 92.5%, with Type I error (alpha) or 0.025 and power of 80%.
Primary

Ventricular Siello S Lead Safety at 5 Years - Individual Adverse Event Rates

Evaluation of the individual adverse events contributing to the outcome measure 'Ventricular Siello S Lead Safety at 5 Years'.

Time frame: 5-years

Population: The Post-Market cohort included all patient who were enrolled in the study and had a Siello lead implanted in the right ventricular position.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
BIOTRONIK Siello S Atrial LeadVentricular Siello S Lead Safety at 5 Years - Individual Adverse Event RatesLead impedance out of range, High0.17 percentage of participants
BIOTRONIK Siello S Atrial LeadVentricular Siello S Lead Safety at 5 Years - Individual Adverse Event RatesLead conductor fracture0.12 percentage of participants
Secondary

Atrial Siello S Lead Safety at 5 Years

The overall percentage of subjects with adverse events that require additional invasive intervention to resolve, related to the Siello leads implanted in the atrium with a BIOTRONIK Evia pacemaker device through 5 years follow-up. This was evaluated as an adverse event free-rate (AEFR).

Time frame: 5-years

Population: The Post-Market cohort included all patient who were enrolled in the study and had a Siello lead implanted in the right atrial position.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
BIOTRONIK Siello S Atrial LeadAtrial Siello S Lead Safety at 5 Years99.87 percentage of participants
Secondary

Atrial Siello S Lead Safety at 5 Years - Individual Adverse Event Rates

Evaluation of the individual adverse events contributing to the outcome measure 'Atrial Siello S Lead Safety at 5 Years'.

Time frame: 5-years

Population: On April 15, 2019, BIOTRONIK received FDA approval to transition the ongoing SIELLO Post Approval Registry to a new EP PASSION real-world data methodology. Therefore, this outcome measure was not completed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
BIOTRONIK Siello S Atrial LeadAtrial Siello S Lead Safety at 5 Years - Individual Adverse Event RatesIntermittent capture0.07 percentage of participants
BIOTRONIK Siello S Atrial LeadAtrial Siello S Lead Safety at 5 Years - Individual Adverse Event RatesSuspected lead failure0.07 percentage of participants
Secondary

Impedance Measurements for Siello S Leads at 12 Months

Impedance measurements for Siello S leads implanted in the atrium or ventricle at the 12 month follow-up visit.

Time frame: 12-months

Population: All originally implanted ventricular or atrial Siello leads with 12-month follow-up data entered into the EDC on or before April 3, 2015 are included in this analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
BIOTRONIK Siello S Atrial LeadImpedance Measurements for Siello S Leads at 12 Months595.7 OhmsStandard Deviation 89.1
Siello S Atrial LeadsImpedance Measurements for Siello S Leads at 12 Months524.0 OhmsStandard Deviation 66.7
Secondary

Impedance Measurements for Siello S Leads Through 5 Years

Impedance measurements for Siello S leads implanted in the atrium or ventricle through the 5 year follow-up visit.

Time frame: 5-years

Population: All originally implanted ventricular or atrial Siello leads with implant and follow-up data entered into the EDC on or before April 17, 2019 are included in this analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
BIOTRONIK Siello S Atrial LeadImpedance Measurements for Siello S Leads Through 5 Years597.6 OhmsStandard Deviation 100
Siello S Atrial LeadsImpedance Measurements for Siello S Leads Through 5 Years514.4 OhmsStandard Deviation 72.6
Secondary

Pacing Threshold Measurements for Siello S Leads at 12 Months

Pacing threshold measurements for Siello S leads implanted in the atrium or ventricle at the 12 month follow-up visit.

Time frame: 12-months

Population: All originally implanted ventricular or atrial Siello leads with 12-month follow-up data entered into the EDC on or before April 3, 2015 are included in this analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
BIOTRONIK Siello S Atrial LeadPacing Threshold Measurements for Siello S Leads at 12 Months0.86 voltsStandard Deviation 0.29
Siello S Atrial LeadsPacing Threshold Measurements for Siello S Leads at 12 Months0.85 voltsStandard Deviation 0.35
Secondary

Pacing Threshold Measurements for Siello S Leads Through 5 Years

Pacing threshold measurements for Siello S leads implanted in the atrium or ventricle through 5 years of follow-up.

Time frame: 5-years

Population: All originally implanted ventricular or atrial Siello leads with implant and follow-up data entered into the EDC on or before April 17, 2019 are included in this analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
BIOTRONIK Siello S Atrial LeadPacing Threshold Measurements for Siello S Leads Through 5 Years0.84 voltsStandard Deviation 0.34
Siello S Atrial LeadsPacing Threshold Measurements for Siello S Leads Through 5 Years0.83 voltsStandard Deviation 0.34
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Other Adverse Events

The overall percentage of subjects with reportable adverse events that were excluded from primary and secondary objectives and occurred through 5 years of follow-up. This was evaluated as an adverse event free-rate (AEFR). Adverse events were considered reportable if the event was related to the implant procedure, implanted pulse generator, or implanted leads.

Time frame: 5-years

Population: The Post-Market cohort included all patient who were enrolled in the study and had one or two Siello leads implanted.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
BIOTRONIK Siello S Atrial LeadPercentage of Participants With Other Adverse Events84.02 percentage of participants
Secondary

Sensing Measurements for Siello S Leads at 12 Months

Sensing measurements for Siello S leads implanted in the atrium or ventricle at the 12 month follow-up visit.

Time frame: 12-months

Population: All originally implanted ventricular or atrial Siello leads with 12-month follow-up data entered into the EDC on or before April 3, 2015 are included in this analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
BIOTRONIK Siello S Atrial LeadSensing Measurements for Siello S Leads at 12 Months12.68 mVStandard Deviation 5.02
Siello S Atrial LeadsSensing Measurements for Siello S Leads at 12 Months3.66 mVStandard Deviation 1.92
Secondary

Sensing Measurements for Siello S Leads Through 5 Years

Sensing measurements for Siello S leads implanted in the atrium or ventricle through the 5 year follow-up visit.

Time frame: 5-years

Population: All originally implanted ventricular or atrial Siello leads with implant and follow-up data entered into the EDC on or before April 17, 2019 are included in this analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
BIOTRONIK Siello S Atrial LeadSensing Measurements for Siello S Leads Through 5 Years12.17 mVStandard Deviation 4.6
Siello S Atrial LeadsSensing Measurements for Siello S Leads Through 5 Years3.53 mVStandard Deviation 1.95
Secondary

Siello S Lead Effectiveness at 5 Years

Success rate of the implanted system to deliver long-term pacing at 5-years post-implant.

Time frame: 5-years

Population: The Post-Market cohort included all patient who were enrolled in the study and had one or two Siello leads implanted.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
BIOTRONIK Siello S Atrial LeadSiello S Lead Effectiveness at 5 Years99.94 percentage of participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 5, 2026