Skip to content

DF4 Master Study (Safety and Efficacy Study)

Master Study of the BIOTRONIK DF4 System

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01790841
Enrollment
240
Registered
2013-02-13
Start date
2013-02-28
Completion date
2016-04-30
Last updated
2016-04-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Heart Failure, Sudden Cardiac Death, Ventricular Fibrillation, Ventricular Tachycardia

Brief summary

The purpose of the study is to proof the safety and efficacy of the new ICD sytem (Iforia/Ilesto). The devices are available with DF-1 and DF4 connection. A special focus is set on the ICD system with DF4 connection.

Interventions

DEVICEIforia/Ilesto ICD/CRT-D, Linox smart DF4 lead/ Protego

Sponsors

Biotronik SE & Co. KG
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Observational model
CASE_CONTROL
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patient has provided written informed consent. * Patient has standard ICD/CRT-D indication. * Patient accepts Home Monitoring concept. * Patient is able to attend the planned hospital follow-up visits. * Patient has legal capacity and ability to consent.

Exclusion criteria

* Patient has a standard contra-indication for ICD/CRT-D therapy. * Age \< 18 years * Patient is pregnant or breastfeeding. * Patient is expected to receive ventricular assist device or heart transplantation within the next 12 months. * Life expectancy of less than 12 months. * Participating in any other clinical study of an investigational cardiac drug or device.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Serious adverse device effect (SADE) rate related to the ICD with DF4 connectionuntil 3 month follow-up
SADE rate related to the Linox smart DF4 lead (ICD shock lead)until 3 month follow-up
Shift rate of the painless shock impedance measurementbetween 3 and 6 month follow-up
Pacing threshold comparison between Linox smart DF-1 and Linox smart DF4 lead3 month follow-up

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Comparison of automatic atrial pacing threshold test vs. manual measurement3 month follow-up

Countries

Germany

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026