Skip to content

Engager Direct Aortic Clinical Study

Engager Direct Aortic Clinical Study: Medtronic Engager™ Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation System Via Direct Aortic Approach

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01789567
Enrollment
20
Registered
2013-02-12
Start date
2013-05-31
Completion date
2015-06-30
Last updated
2018-07-26

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Aortic Valve Stenosis

Brief summary

To confirm the safety and performance of the Medtronic Engager™ Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation System via direct aortic approach.

Detailed description

To confirm the safety and performance of the Medtronic Engager™ Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation System via direct aortic approach in patients with symptomatic severe aortic valve stenosis at high or extreme risk for surgical aortic valve replacement for which treatment via direct aortic access is preferred.

Interventions

DEVICEEngager™ aortic valve

Implantation of the Medtronic Engager™ bioprosthesis via direct aortic approach

Sponsors

Medtronic Cardiac Rhythm and Heart Failure
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Severe aortic stenosis as defined by Doppler echocardiography: aortic valve area ≤ 0.8 cm2 (or AVA index ≤ 0.5 cm2/m2), or mean gradient ≥ 40 mmHg, or max velocity ≥ 4m/s * NYHA Functional Class II or greater; * Logistic EuroSCORE I ≥ 20%, or comorbidity judged by the heart team to pose an absolute or relative contraindication for conventional aortic valve replacement; * Non-calcified ascending aortic site ≥ 50 mm from the aortic valve basal plane; * Age ≥ 18 years; * The patient has been informed of the nature of the study and has consented to participate, authorizing the collection and release of his/her medical information by signing a consent form (Patient Informed Consent Form). Patient should understand the implications of participating in the study and should be legally competent to provide informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

* Unicuspid or bicuspid aortic valve; * Echocardiographic evidence of intracardiac mass, thrombus, or vegetation; * Left ventricular ejection fraction \< 25%; * Left ventricular outflow obstruction, such as Hypertrophic Obstructive Cardiomyopathy and severe septal hypertrophy; * Mitral or tricuspid regurgitation greater than 2+ by angiography or moderate by echocardiography; * Patients with life expectancy less than 12 months due to an underlying non-cardiac co-morbid disease; * Known hypersensitivity or contraindication to aspirin, heparin, ticlopidine, clopidogrel, Nitinol or contrast medium that cannot be adequately controlled with pre-medication; * Sepsis or acute endocarditis; * Blood dyscrasia such as acute anemia, leucopenia, or thrombocytopenia; bleeding diathesis, or coagulopathy; * Renal insufficiency assessed by creatinine clearance \< 20 ml/min and/or end-stage renal disease requiring chronic dialysis; * Active peptic ulcer or GI bleeding within 3 months from the planned index procedure; * Untreated clinically significant coronary artery disease requiring revascularization; * Cardiogenic shock, suspected cardiogenic shock, or hemodynamic instability requiring inotropic support or mechanical heart assistance; * Significant aortic disease, including abdominal and thoracic aortic aneurysm, defined as maximal luminal diameter of 5 cm or greater; * Need for emergency surgery, cardiac or non-cardiac; * History of myocardial infarction in the last 6 weeks; * History of TIA or CVA in the last 6 months; * Therapeutic invasive cardiac procedure, with the exception of BAV, performed within 30 days of the planned date of valve implantation, or 6 months in the case of drug-eluting stents; * Pre-existing prosthetic heart valve or prosthetic ring in any position; * Patent RIMA or pre-existing patent RIMA graft at direct aortic access site and/or trajectory; * Patient refuses a blood transfusion; * Pregnant or breastfeeding women; * Patient is currently enrolled in another investigational device or drug trial that may influence the outcome of this trial.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Acute Delivery System SuccessWithin 30 days of implant procedureAcute delivery system success, defined as bioprosthesis deployed in anatomically correct position and freedom from delivery system related complications at the end of the procedure.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Device Success According to VARC230 days post-procedureDevice success is a composite of: Absence of 30-day in-hospital death Correct position of the device within the aortic annular region Intended performance of the bioprosthesis (no patient-prosthesis mismatch, mean aortic gradient \<20 mmHg or peak velocity \<3 m/s at discharge, and no moderate or severe prosthetic valve regurgitation)
Composite 30-day Safety Endpoint According to VARC230-days post-procedurePercentage of Participants with any of the following Safety Events within 30-days post-procedure: All-cause mortality All stroke Life-threatening bleeding Acute kidney injury (stage 2-3) Coronary artery obstruction requiring intervention Major vascular complication Valve-related dysfunction requiring repeat procedure (BAV, TAVI or SAVR)
Composite Clinical Efficacy Endpoint After 30 Days According to VARC230-days post-procedurePercentage of Participants with any of the following Safety Events after 30-days post-procedure: All-cause mortality All stroke Hospitalization for valve-related symptoms or worsening congestive heart failure

Countries

Czechia, Germany, United Kingdom

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Engager™ Aortic Valve
Implantation of the Medtronic Engager™ bioprosthesis via direct aortic approach Engager™ aortic valve: Implantation of the Medtronic Engager™ bioprosthesis via direct aortic approach
20
Total20

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyDeath6

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicEngager™ Aortic Valve
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
20 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
0 Participants
Age, Continuous80.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.4
Peripheral vascular disease
No peripheral vascular disease
10 participants
Peripheral vascular disease
Peripheral vascular disease
10 participants
Region of Enrollment
Czech Republic
3 participants
Region of Enrollment
Germany
14 participants
Region of Enrollment
United Kingdom
3 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
10 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
10 Participants
STS Risk of Mortality5.9 %
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.7

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
20 / 20
serious
Total, serious adverse events
20 / 20

Outcome results

Primary

Acute Delivery System Success

Acute delivery system success, defined as bioprosthesis deployed in anatomically correct position and freedom from delivery system related complications at the end of the procedure.

Time frame: Within 30 days of implant procedure

Population: Analysis for this endpoint includes subjects with an implant attempt.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Engager™ Aortic ValveAcute Delivery System Success95.0 percentage of participants
Other Pre-specified

Composite 30-day Safety Endpoint According to VARC2

Percentage of Participants with any of the following Safety Events within 30-days post-procedure: All-cause mortality All stroke Life-threatening bleeding Acute kidney injury (stage 2-3) Coronary artery obstruction requiring intervention Major vascular complication Valve-related dysfunction requiring repeat procedure (BAV, TAVI or SAVR)

Time frame: 30-days post-procedure

Population: Analysis for this endpoint includes subjects with an implant attempt.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Engager™ Aortic ValveComposite 30-day Safety Endpoint According to VARC225.0 percentage of participants
Other Pre-specified

Composite Clinical Efficacy Endpoint After 30 Days According to VARC2

Percentage of Participants with any of the following Safety Events after 30-days post-procedure: All-cause mortality All stroke Hospitalization for valve-related symptoms or worsening congestive heart failure

Time frame: 30-days post-procedure

Population: Analysis for this endpoint includes subjects at risk (or alive and in study) at 30 days.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Engager™ Aortic ValveComposite Clinical Efficacy Endpoint After 30 Days According to VARC294.4 percentage of participants
Other Pre-specified

Device Success According to VARC2

Device success is a composite of: Absence of 30-day in-hospital death Correct position of the device within the aortic annular region Intended performance of the bioprosthesis (no patient-prosthesis mismatch, mean aortic gradient \<20 mmHg or peak velocity \<3 m/s at discharge, and no moderate or severe prosthetic valve regurgitation)

Time frame: 30 days post-procedure

Population: Analysis for this endpoint includes subjects with an implant attempt.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Engager™ Aortic ValveDevice Success According to VARC215.0 percentage of participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026