3D Ultrasound - Based Hysteroscopy Versus Virtual Hysteroscopy

Contribution of 3D Sonohysterography and Virtual Hysteroscopy in Exploration of the Uterine Cavity in Comparison to the Diagnostic Hysteroscopy.

Status

Terminated

Phases

Study type

Interventional

Source

ClinicalTrials.gov

Registry ID

NCT01789489

Enrollment

Registered

2013-02-12

Start date

2010-07-31

Completion date

2011-01-31

Last updated

2016-09-23

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Endometrial or Uterine Pathology

Brief summary

To prove that the 3 dimensional sonohysterography is, at least, as effective as the diagnostic hysteroscopy in examining the uterine cavity.

Interventions

DEVICEMedison Accuvix V20, sonde 3D5-9EK (Endovaginal 3 dimensional echography)

Study design

Allocation

RANDOMIZED

Intervention model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary purpose

DIAGNOSTIC

Masking

NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

FEMALE

Age

18 Years to 45 Years

Healthy volunteers

Inclusion criteria

\- Diagnostic hysteroscopy prescribed either for a case of infertility or in case of doubt of endometrial / uterine pathology suspected by ultrasound or hysterography.

Exclusion criteria

* Current Pregnancy. * Genital infection

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Polyps, fibrosis, atrophy, hypertrophy and other uterine pathology detected by 3D sonohysterography (Accuracy of uterine cavity exploration by 3D sonohysterography)	7 months

Countries

France

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026