Skip to content

Effects of Exercise Intervention on Aging-related Motor Decline

Effects of Exercise Intervention on Aging-related Motor Decline (AGING)

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01787292
Acronym
EIAMD
Enrollment
33
Registered
2013-02-08
Start date
2013-01-14
Completion date
2019-08-01
Last updated
2020-02-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Aging, Exercise

Keywords

Exercise, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation, Aging

Brief summary

The purpose of this research study is to test whether differing levels of physical fitness affects patterns of motor dexterity and brain activity that have been shown to differ due to aging. Testing will take place at the Atlanta VA Medical Center and at Emory University. Participants will be healthy adults within the target age range of 60-85 for the study. The study will require multiple visits over 15 months. There will be about 64 people volunteering for this study.

Detailed description

The U.S. Census reports over 14 million U.S. Veterans (\>63%) are beyond mid-life (\>55 years). Declines in upper extremity motor performance respective of strength and dexterity are well documented within this age cohort). Recent cross-sectional research has discovered that aging related motor deficits may be influenced by a loss of interhemispheric inhibition (IHI) between primary motor cortices. However, this loss may not be an inevitable consequence of aging. Work from previous VA OAA Predoctoral and CDA-1 awards have shown that aerobic fitness may serve to mitigate losses in interhemispheric inhibition assessed by both functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). That is, individuals who are aerobically fit show higher levels of IHI and improved dexterity and reaction times. In light of new evidence from the investigators' lab's recent cross-sectional studies, physical activity over the long term (at least 2-5 years) may serve to alter levels of IHI and improve motor performance in the upper extremity. Aerobic exercise may provide a mechanism (reduced loss of interhemispheric inhibition) that could serve to improve motor function, but the neural mechanism responsible for such effects remains unclear. Previous investigations of interhemispheric communication and exercise have been limited by nature of inquiry, as cross-sectional research cannot measure changes over time in participants. As such, it is currently unknown how exercise may directly affect levels of interhemispheric communication and motor performance. Behavioral interventions (motor strength and coordination) have been shown to be effective in improving upper extremity motor performance in older adults, however the duration of these gains appear to be short-lived. After as little as a few weeks of detraining, motor strength and coordination in the upper extremity rapidly begins to return to pre-intervention levels. Evidence from exercise interventions assessing gait and locomotion have shown that exercise programs over a longer term (\>6 months) are associated with improved proprioception, fewer falls and better balance. However, the comparison of outcomes of upper extremity function in elderly adults respective of exercise duration remains largely unexplored. In addition to comparing the effects of short-term exercise (3 months) versus behavioral training (3 months) on upper extremity function, the current proposal will evaluate if a longer-term (6 months) exercise program can maintain or enhance upper extremity function and associated levels of interhemispheric inhibition. The current study proposes the next logical step in my line of research and directly investigates the effects of exercise in an intervention with sedentary older Veterans (50-80 years), a group most likely to exhibit aging-related motor deficits. The investigators propose to enroll 40 Veterans into an upper extremity dexterity improvement program involving behavioral and exercise components. The behavioral intervention is a muscle coordination training previously shown to improve unimanual motor performance in older adults. The exercise intervention is a supervised group cycling regimen. The figure below shows the study design. Interhemispheric communication will be assessed with fMRI, and TMS.

Interventions

A. Light stretching and balance exercises under supervised trainer. 3 times per week for 20-45 minutes. HR will be targeted to be under 50% of age-related maximum.

Supervised weekly exercise. 3 bouts of 45 minutes weekly on a cycle ergometer. HR will be kept at 75% of age-related maximum.

BEHAVIORALSelf Monitoring

6 month self-monitored training phase during which time participants will exercise according to prescribed regimen (cycling)

Sponsors

VA Office of Research and Development
Lead SponsorFED

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
BASIC_SCIENCE
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

A. Light stretching and balance exercises under supervised trainer. 3 times per week for 20-45 minutes. HR will be targeted to be under 50% of age-related maximum. B. Interval aerobic cycling under supervised trainer. 3 times per week for 20-45 minutes. HR will be targeted between 50-85% of age-related maximum. C. 6 month self-monitored training phase during which time participants will exercise using a take home bike ergometer

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
60 Years to 85 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Living persons between 60 and 85 years of age

Exclusion criteria

* unmanaged diabetes * participants completing vigorous exercise per week * participants whose profession requires vigorous physical labor * contraindication to magnetic resonance imaging

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Comparison of Silent Period Duration After Balance Exercise24 and 48 weeksComparison of Home based training effects on TMS measures of silent period duration as compared to facility based exercise programs.
Comparison of Cardiovascular Efficiency for Aerobic Exercise First Group After Home-based Intervention24 and 48 weeksComparison of home based aerobic exercise intervention to assessments made after completion of crossover intervention in Participants receiving aerobic condition first. VO2peak estimation completed using the YMCA protocol investigating overall volume of oxygen consumption as a function of heart rate during work loads. Estimated VO2 peak values are in ml/kg(min).
Comparison of Cardiovascular Efficiency for Balance Exercise First Group After Home-based Intervention24 and 48 weeksVO2peak estimation completed using the YMCA protocol investigating overall volume of oxygen consumption as a function of heart rate during work loads.
Comparison of Silent Period Duration After Aerobic ExerciseBaseline, 12 weeks, 24 weeksComparison of silent period duration at 24 weeks compared to baseline
Estimate Cardiovascular Efficiency After Aerobic ExerciseBaseline, 12 weeks, 24 weeksEstimate of Volume of oxygen consumption (VO2peak) using YMCA protocol for cardiovascular assessment.
Estimate of Cardiovascular Efficiency After Balance TrainingBaseline, 12 weeks, 24 weeksEstimated VO2peak using YMCA cycle test completed over nine to twelve minutes.
Silent Period Duration After Exercise Cycling ProgramBaseline, 12 weeks, 24 weeksDuration of ipsilateral silent period from Transcranial magnetic stimulation measured in milliseconds
Silent Period Duration for Balance GroupBaseline, 12 weeks, 24 weeksIpsilateral silent period duration as assessed by TMS
fMRI Interhemispheric Inhibition Improvement After Aerobic ExerciseBaseline to 24 Weeks with cross-overParticipants who exercise will evidence larger increases in interhemispheric inhibition as assessed by functional magnetic resonance measured by a z-normalized area under curve of right primary motor cortex. The area under the curve is an estimate of the fMRI hemodynamic response impulse response function. A higher number of AUC indicates less interhemispheric inhibition. In contrast, a lower number in this analysis indicates higher interhemispheric inhibition.
fMRI Interhemispheric Inhibition Improvement After Balance TrainingBaseline, 12 weeks, 24 weeksArea under the curve of fMRI measures of right motor cortex BOLD profile will remain similar to pre measurements. The BOLD profile is the z-normalized area under the curve value of the fMRI impulse response function. A higher number indicates less interhemispheric inhibition.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Target Heart Rate Zone After Aerobic Exercise First24 and 48 weeksTargeted Heart Rate Zone among participants compared among short term exercise groups
Heart Rate Workload After Home Based Intervention24 and 48 weeksMeasured heart rate after home based intervention Technical implementation at the facility level prevented acquisition of these metrics until late in the project.
Target Heart Rate Zone for Balance First Participants24 and 48 weeksHeart rate in aerobic target zone is measured in percentage of time in at least 50% of participants heart rate reserve.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Community-dwelling individuals were recruited for participation using approved flyer and advertising materials. All participants gave voluntary written consent prior to participation. After consenting, participants were randomly assigned to one of two 12-week exercise interventions involving a followed by cross-over to the other intervention.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Exercise Interventions for Crossover Design
This study was a cross-over design with two groups to which participants were randomized. Group one received a 12-week Aerobic exercise intervention and then crossed over into a balance exercise intervention. Group two received the balance intervention for 12 weeks and then crossed over into the aerobic exercise intervention. All completing participants then engaged in a home based exercise program during which they were instructed to exercise thrice weekly over 24 weeks.
33
Total33

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Crossover Exercise InterventionsWithdrawal by Subject22
Home Based Exercise ProgramWithdrawal by Subject31

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicExercise Interventions for Crossover Design
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
25 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
8 Participants
Age, Continuous69.05 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.98
Cardiovascular Efficiency25.25 ml/kg(min)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.74
FMRI of Right Motor Cortex1.85 area under curve
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.2
Ipsilateral Silent Period22.39 milliseconds
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.73
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
16 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
17 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
19 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
14 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 170 / 16
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 170 / 16
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 170 / 16

Outcome results

Primary

Comparison of Cardiovascular Efficiency for Aerobic Exercise First Group After Home-based Intervention

Comparison of home based aerobic exercise intervention to assessments made after completion of crossover intervention in Participants receiving aerobic condition first. VO2peak estimation completed using the YMCA protocol investigating overall volume of oxygen consumption as a function of heart rate during work loads. Estimated VO2 peak values are in ml/kg(min).

Time frame: 24 and 48 weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Experimental: Aerobic FirstComparison of Cardiovascular Efficiency for Aerobic Exercise First Group After Home-based InterventionWithin one week of completing 24 week intervention25.25 ml/kg(min)Standard Deviation 12.25
Experimental: Aerobic FirstComparison of Cardiovascular Efficiency for Aerobic Exercise First Group After Home-based InterventionWithin one week of completing 48 Week Intervention21.2 ml/kg(min)Standard Deviation 9.88
p-value: 0.01t-test, 2 sided
Primary

Comparison of Cardiovascular Efficiency for Balance Exercise First Group After Home-based Intervention

VO2peak estimation completed using the YMCA protocol investigating overall volume of oxygen consumption as a function of heart rate during work loads.

Time frame: 24 and 48 weeks

Population: Participants completed both exercise interventions but completed Balance training prior to engaging in aerobic exercise training.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Experimental: Aerobic FirstComparison of Cardiovascular Efficiency for Balance Exercise First Group After Home-based InterventionWithin one week of completing 24 week intervention25.5 ml/kg(min)Standard Deviation 12.8
Experimental: Aerobic FirstComparison of Cardiovascular Efficiency for Balance Exercise First Group After Home-based InterventionWithin one week of completing 48 Week Intervention20.8 ml/kg(min)Standard Deviation 12.2
p-value: 0.5t-test, 2 sided
Primary

Comparison of Silent Period Duration After Aerobic Exercise

Comparison of silent period duration at 24 weeks compared to baseline

Time frame: Baseline, 12 weeks, 24 weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Experimental: Aerobic FirstComparison of Silent Period Duration After Aerobic ExercisePre20.58 millisecondsStandard Deviation 7.5
Experimental: Aerobic FirstComparison of Silent Period Duration After Aerobic Exercise12-Weeks26.2 millisecondsStandard Deviation 7.5
Experimental: Aerobic FirstComparison of Silent Period Duration After Aerobic Exercise24-week post-cross27.5 millisecondsStandard Deviation 7.4
p-value: 0.6t-test, 2 sided
Primary

Comparison of Silent Period Duration After Balance Exercise

Comparison of Home based training effects on TMS measures of silent period duration as compared to facility based exercise programs.

Time frame: 24 and 48 weeks

Population: Participants completing balance training then crossing over into aerobic exercise were then tested for effects of facility based treatments against home exercise.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Experimental: Aerobic FirstComparison of Silent Period Duration After Balance ExerciseWithin one week of completing 24 week intervention26.54 millisecondsStandard Deviation 8.4
Experimental: Aerobic FirstComparison of Silent Period Duration After Balance ExerciseWithin one week of completing 48 Week Intervention21.6 millisecondsStandard Deviation 9.3
p-value: 0.4t-test, 2 sided
Primary

Estimate Cardiovascular Efficiency After Aerobic Exercise

Estimate of Volume of oxygen consumption (VO2peak) using YMCA protocol for cardiovascular assessment.

Time frame: Baseline, 12 weeks, 24 weeks

Population: Estimated VO2 peak values in ml/kg(min)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Experimental: Aerobic FirstEstimate Cardiovascular Efficiency After Aerobic ExerciseBaseline24.01 ml/kg(min)Standard Deviation 9.29
Experimental: Aerobic FirstEstimate Cardiovascular Efficiency After Aerobic Exercise12-Week post31.2 ml/kg(min)Standard Deviation 8.6
Experimental: Aerobic FirstEstimate Cardiovascular Efficiency After Aerobic Exercise24-week post-cross32.3 ml/kg(min)Standard Deviation 6.8
p-value: 0.001ANCOVA
Primary

Estimate of Cardiovascular Efficiency After Balance Training

Estimated VO2peak using YMCA cycle test completed over nine to twelve minutes.

Time frame: Baseline, 12 weeks, 24 weeks

Population: Sedentary older adults who engaged in less than 45 minutes of regular exercise per week

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Experimental: Aerobic FirstEstimate of Cardiovascular Efficiency After Balance TrainingPre22.83 ml/kg(min)Standard Deviation 7.35
Experimental: Aerobic FirstEstimate of Cardiovascular Efficiency After Balance Training12-Weeks24.72 ml/kg(min)Standard Deviation 9.36
Experimental: Aerobic FirstEstimate of Cardiovascular Efficiency After Balance Training24-week post-cross23.58 ml/kg(min)Standard Deviation 8.25
Comparison: To account for sequence carryover, we employed analysis of covariance inclusive of sequence by period covariates against treatment effects.p-value: 0.8ANCOVA
Primary

fMRI Interhemispheric Inhibition Improvement After Aerobic Exercise

Participants who exercise will evidence larger increases in interhemispheric inhibition as assessed by functional magnetic resonance measured by a z-normalized area under curve of right primary motor cortex. The area under the curve is an estimate of the fMRI hemodynamic response impulse response function. A higher number of AUC indicates less interhemispheric inhibition. In contrast, a lower number in this analysis indicates higher interhemispheric inhibition.

Time frame: Baseline to 24 Weeks with cross-over

Population: Analysis of area under curve of right primary motor cortical area

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Experimental: Aerobic FirstfMRI Interhemispheric Inhibition Improvement After Aerobic ExercisePre1.5 Z-transformed impulse response functionStandard Deviation 1.2
Experimental: Aerobic FirstfMRI Interhemispheric Inhibition Improvement After Aerobic Exercise12 week intervention.58 Z-transformed impulse response functionStandard Deviation 0.98
Experimental: Aerobic FirstfMRI Interhemispheric Inhibition Improvement After Aerobic Exercise24 week post-crossover.58 Z-transformed impulse response functionStandard Deviation 0.98
p-value: 0.01t-test, 2 sided
Primary

fMRI Interhemispheric Inhibition Improvement After Balance Training

Area under the curve of fMRI measures of right motor cortex BOLD profile will remain similar to pre measurements. The BOLD profile is the z-normalized area under the curve value of the fMRI impulse response function. A higher number indicates less interhemispheric inhibition.

Time frame: Baseline, 12 weeks, 24 weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Experimental: Aerobic FirstfMRI Interhemispheric Inhibition Improvement After Balance TrainingPre1.49 Z-transformed impulse response functionStandard Deviation 0.88
Experimental: Aerobic FirstfMRI Interhemispheric Inhibition Improvement After Balance Training12-Weeks.62 Z-transformed impulse response functionStandard Deviation 0.52
Experimental: Aerobic FirstfMRI Interhemispheric Inhibition Improvement After Balance Training24-week post-cross.62 Z-transformed impulse response functionStandard Deviation 0.52
p-value: 0.01t-test, 2 sided
Primary

Silent Period Duration After Exercise Cycling Program

Duration of ipsilateral silent period from Transcranial magnetic stimulation measured in milliseconds

Time frame: Baseline, 12 weeks, 24 weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Experimental: Aerobic FirstSilent Period Duration After Exercise Cycling Program12-Week post26.2 millisecondsStandard Deviation 7.5
Experimental: Aerobic FirstSilent Period Duration After Exercise Cycling Program24-week post-cross27.5 millisecondsStandard Deviation 7.4
Experimental: Aerobic FirstSilent Period Duration After Exercise Cycling ProgramBaseline22 millisecondsStandard Deviation 7.8
p-value: 0.05ANCOVA
Primary

Silent Period Duration for Balance Group

Ipsilateral silent period duration as assessed by TMS

Time frame: Baseline, 12 weeks, 24 weeks

Population: Sedentary older adults engaging in less than 45 minutes of total activity per week

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Experimental: Aerobic FirstSilent Period Duration for Balance GroupPre23 millisecondsStandard Deviation 8.9
Experimental: Aerobic FirstSilent Period Duration for Balance Group12-Weeks21.2 millisecondsStandard Deviation 5.1
Experimental: Aerobic FirstSilent Period Duration for Balance Group24-week post-cross26.2 millisecondsStandard Deviation 8.1
p-value: 0.05ANCOVA
Secondary

Heart Rate Workload After Home Based Intervention

Measured heart rate after home based intervention Technical implementation at the facility level prevented acquisition of these metrics until late in the project.

Time frame: 24 and 48 weeks

Population: Participants completing home based interventions compared to facility based interventions - measured in time in aerobic zone.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Experimental: Aerobic FirstHeart Rate Workload After Home Based InterventionWithin one week of completing 24 week intervention78 percentage of timeStandard Deviation 18
Experimental: Aerobic FirstHeart Rate Workload After Home Based InterventionWithin one week of completing 48 Week Intervention48 percentage of timeStandard Deviation 30
p-value: 0.01t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Target Heart Rate Zone After Aerobic Exercise First

Targeted Heart Rate Zone among participants compared among short term exercise groups

Time frame: 24 and 48 weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Experimental: Aerobic FirstTarget Heart Rate Zone After Aerobic Exercise FirstWithin one week of completing 24 week intervention93.7 percentage of timeStandard Deviation 10.1
Experimental: Aerobic FirstTarget Heart Rate Zone After Aerobic Exercise FirstWithin one week of completing 48 Week Intervention70.6 percentage of timeStandard Deviation 22.5
p-value: 0.25t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Target Heart Rate Zone for Balance First Participants

Heart rate in aerobic target zone is measured in percentage of time in at least 50% of participants heart rate reserve.

Time frame: 24 and 48 weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Experimental: Aerobic FirstTarget Heart Rate Zone for Balance First ParticipantsWithin one week of completing 24 week intervention58.4 percentage of timeStandard Deviation 34.6
Experimental: Aerobic FirstTarget Heart Rate Zone for Balance First ParticipantsWithin one week of completing 48 Week Intervention88.5 percentage of timeStandard Deviation 14.7
p-value: 0.05t-test, 2 sided

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 27, 2026