Skip to content

Understanding the Response to Fesoterodine Through Genetic Evaluation in the Elderly (URGE)

Understanding the Response to Fesoterodine Through Genetic Evaluation in the Elderly

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01786967
Acronym
URGE
Enrollment
61
Registered
2013-02-08
Start date
2012-09-30
Completion date
2017-12-31
Last updated
2020-03-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Urge Urinary Incontinence

Keywords

overactive bladder, urge urinary incontinence, pharmacogenetics

Brief summary

Urge urinary incontinence, characterized by unpredictable and embarrassing large volume urine leakage, is a major health issue for elderly women, as it is incredibly common and significantly impairs quality of life. Although anticholinergic medications are the most common therapy, the investigators are unable to predict an individual's response to a particular drug in terms of both effectiveness and side effects. Through genetic evaluation, the investigators have the potential to personalize and optimize drug therapy for millions of elderly women suffering from urge incontinence.

Detailed description

Urge urinary incontinence (UUI), characterized by unpredictable and embarrassing large volume urine leakage, is a major public health burden to elderly women, given its high prevalence, impairment of quality of life, associated caregiver burden, and substantial economic costs. UUI is significantly more prevalent in older adults and disproportionately affects women, with a prevalence of 19% in community-dwelling women over 65 and 60-78% in long-term care female residents. Anticholinergic medications are the most common first-line therapy for UUI. Although numerous trials have demonstrated that anticholinergics are efficacious for UUI, the response to these medications is variable, as their effectiveness is often limited by poor response or adverse events (AEs), such as cognitive impairment or constipation, which are particularly problematic in older adults. Furthermore, a comprehensive systematic review concluded that no one drug is definitively superior, leaving clinicians without any evidence to guide decision-making regarding drug choice. As a result, UUI pharmacotherapy is empiric and not personalized, even though it is clear that individual variations exist in both response and toxicity. The treatment of UUI is especially challenging in the geriatric population, given their higher risk for AEs, polypharmacy, and pharmacokinetic changes that occur with age. The ability to predict which elderly women with UUI will experience low efficacy or develop significant adverse events from anticholinergic medications would be a paradigm shift in the therapeutic practice to this highly prevalent and bothersome condition. Pharmacogenetics may provide insight into how to predict response to anticholinergic UUI therapy. Research has already shown that genetic differences in drug metabolism impact a patient's drug response. For example, fast metabolizers may metabolize the drug so rapidly that therapeutic levels are never reached, limiting effectiveness. In contrast, slow metabolizers may develop high drug concentrations, resulting in significantly more AEs. While pharmacogenetic research exists for numerous classes of drugs, including anticoagulants, selective serotonin-reuptake inhibitors,14 beta-blockers, immunosuppressants and opioids, this type of translational research does not exist for anticholinergics for UUI. Thus, this proposed project represents a novel concept and unique opportunity to dramatically change UUI pharmacotherapy. Fesoterodine is an ideal anticholinergic medication to launch a pharmacogenetic study in this field. Fesoterodine's active metabolite, 5-hydroxymethyl tolterodine (5-HMT), is metabolized by a well-characterized cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzyme, CYP2D6. The CYP2D6 gene has several genetic variants, which result in different metabolizer statuses ranging from poor metabolizers (PM), intermediate metabolizers (IM), extensive metabolizers (EM), to ultrarapid metabolizers (UM). These different CYP2D6 profiles may be clinically important, as they may contribute to the variability in efficacy and AEs. In fact, pharmaceutical company data for fesoterodine demonstrated that PMs have a two-fold higher plasma concentration than EMs; however, no published data exist on how CYP2D6 metabolizer status correlates with clinical outcomes such as efficacy or AEs. The ability to use CYP2D6 metabolizer status to predict which individuals will experience low efficacy or develop AEs to fesoterodine, and to utilize alternative therapies in these women, would challenge existing therapeutic paradigms and would significantly advance clinical practice via a pharmacogenetic approach. Specific Aim 1: To explore whether CYP2D6 metabolizer status can predict efficacy during 4 weeks of fesoterodine fumarate therapy in elderly women with UUI. All subjects will be started on fesoterodine 4mg for 2 weeks followed by 8mg for 2 weeks. The primary outcome will be patient-reported treatment response based on a 4-point scale utilized in phase III clinical trials.8,9 We hypothesize that women who rapidly metabolize fesoterodine based on CYP2D6 metabolizer status are more likely to have low efficacy. Specific Aim 2: To explore whether CYP2D6 metabolizer status can predict moderate to severe adverse events during 4 weeks of fesoterodine fumarate therapy in elderly women with UUI. In the same study design as Aim #1, we will identify subjects with moderate to severe fesoterodine-related AEs. We hypothesize that women who are CYP2D6 poor metabolizers are more likely to have moderate to severe AEs. Specific Aim 3: To utilize preliminary data from this pilot, proof-of-concept study to plan a future large-scale trial to predict outcomes of anticholinergic UUI therapy based on CYP2D6 metabolizer status. Data regarding efficacy rates, risk of moderate-severe AEs, and the impact of CYP2D6 metabolizer status on efficacy and AEs, in addition to information regarding recruitment, drop-out, and questionnaire burden, will critically inform the study design, outcome measures and sample size of future, definitive trials. This proposal represents an innovative approach to pharmacotherapy for UUI, a highly prevalent condition with significant morbidity. Pharmacogenetics has tremendous potential to identify ideal candidates for anticholinergic UUI therapy and to distinguish individuals who may benefit from alternative treatment options. This pioneering pharmacogenetic research has the potential to lay the necessary groundwork for future long-term research which would optimize and personalize UUI therapy for millions of elderly women. Design & Procedures: Patient Population: All women aged 50 years or older who desire treatment for bothersome UUI will be approached for enrollment. Women with ≥ 3 UUI episodes on a 3-day voiding diary will be included. Although women who have previously failed fesoterodine will be excluded, those who have failed other UUI anticholinergics remain eligible after a 2-week washout period. Subjects with auditory or visual sensory impairment will be included. If visual impairment exists, the research coordinator will provide assistance to complete the necessary documents. However, those who are unable to complete the study-related items and visits, such as women with cognitive impairment, based on the Mini-Cog validated questionnaire will be excluded.

Interventions

FDA approved anticholinergic medication used for treatment of urge urinary incontinence

Sponsors

National Institute on Aging (NIA)
CollaboratorNIH
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
50 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Women ≥ 50 years * ≥ 3 UUI episodes on a 3-day voiding diary * Urge-predominant incontinence, \>50% of total incontinence episodes * No history of failure to fesoterodine * 2-week washout period if currently on an anticholinergic for UUI * Willingness to avoid off-protocol UUI therapy during the study period * Post Void Residual (PVR) \<150 mL

Exclusion criteria

* Contraindications to fesoterodine (e.g., bladder outlet obstruction, narrow angle glaucoma, myasthenia gravis, severe hepatic or renal impairment) * Inability to complete study-related items and visits - i.e., cognitive impairment based on Mini-Cog test score (exclude if score of 0 or 1-2 (Abnormal)) * Urinary retention requiring catheterization * Symptomatic, untreated urinary tract infection not resolved prior to starting fesoterodine * Botulinum toxin injection for UUI in the last year * Current therapy with peripheral or sacral neuromodulation * Neurologic conditions that may affect urinary function (stroke, multiple sclerosis, spinal cord injury, Parkinson's disease) * Women taking potent CYP3A4 inhibitors

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage With Treatment Success4 weeksTreatment Success (Yes/No) was defined by the Treatment Benefit Scale (TBS). TBS is a 4-point scale which was dichotomized into Yes/No for the Treatment Success outcome. The scale asks participants to rate My condition has been improved: 1= greatly improved, 2=improved, 3=not changed, 4= worsened. If a participant responded 1 (greatly improved) or 2 (improved), they were considered as a Yes for Treatment Success. If a participant responded 3 (not changed) or 4 (worsened), then they were considered as a No for Treatment Success.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage With Moderate to Severe Anticipated Drug Associated Adverse Events4 weeksOutcome was defined as moderate to severe anticipated adverse events (AE) based on the NCI Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE). Each AE is graded 1-5 with Grade 1=mild AE, Grade 2=moderate AE, Grade 3=severe AE, Grade 4=life-threatening or disabling AE, grade 5=Death-related to AE. Any side effect grade \>= 2 considered a moderate to severe AE. Anticipated AEs included dizziness, somnolence, insomnia, confusion, cognitive impairment, dry eyes, blurry vision, dry mouth, constipation, nausea, dyspepsia and urinary retention. Example: dry mouth grades per CTCAE: Grade 1=symptomatic without significant dietary alteration; unstimulated saliva flow \> 0.2 mL/min; Grade 2=symptomatic and significant oral intake alteration; unstimulated saliva flow 0.1 to 0.2 mL/min; Grade 3=symptoms leading to inability to adequately aliment orally; IV fluids, tube feedings or total parenteral nutrition indicated; unstimulated saliva \< 0.1 mL/min.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Fesoterodine Fumarate
Women aged 50 and older received 4mg of fesoterodine fumarate for 2 weeks followed by 8mg fesoterodine for 2 weeks.
61
Total61

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicFesoterodine Fumarate
Age, Continuous69.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.1
Current smoker
Current smoker-No
59 Participants
Current smoker
Current smoker-Yes
2 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
1 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
60 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
Functional Comorbidity Index Score3 units on a scale
Katz ADL (Activities of Daily Living) score (total)5 units on a scale
Lawton IADL (Instrumental Activities of Daily Living Scale) score (total)8 units on a scale
Overactive bladder questionnaire - quality of life48.0 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 19.8
Overactive bladder questionnaire - symptom bother68.1 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 19.9
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
7 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
54 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
61 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
0 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 540 / 40 / 3
other
Total, other adverse events
5 / 540 / 40 / 3
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 540 / 40 / 3

Outcome results

Primary

Percentage With Treatment Success

Treatment Success (Yes/No) was defined by the Treatment Benefit Scale (TBS). TBS is a 4-point scale which was dichotomized into Yes/No for the Treatment Success outcome. The scale asks participants to rate My condition has been improved: 1= greatly improved, 2=improved, 3=not changed, 4= worsened. If a participant responded 1 (greatly improved) or 2 (improved), they were considered as a Yes for Treatment Success. If a participant responded 3 (not changed) or 4 (worsened), then they were considered as a No for Treatment Success.

Time frame: 4 weeks

Population: Extensive and poor metabolizers are the two cohorts being compared. These cohorts were determined based on their CYP2D6 sequence. Only 58 subjects have data as 3 participants' sequencing did not yield a definitive metabolizer status.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Extensive MetabolizersPercentage With Treatment Success74.1 percentage of participants
Poor MetabolizersPercentage With Treatment Success75.0 percentage of participants
Comparison: Null hypothesis was that there will be no difference in treatment benefit scale between the two groupsp-value: 195% CI: [0.53, 1.71]Fisher Exact
Secondary

Percentage With Moderate to Severe Anticipated Drug Associated Adverse Events

Outcome was defined as moderate to severe anticipated adverse events (AE) based on the NCI Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE). Each AE is graded 1-5 with Grade 1=mild AE, Grade 2=moderate AE, Grade 3=severe AE, Grade 4=life-threatening or disabling AE, grade 5=Death-related to AE. Any side effect grade \>= 2 considered a moderate to severe AE. Anticipated AEs included dizziness, somnolence, insomnia, confusion, cognitive impairment, dry eyes, blurry vision, dry mouth, constipation, nausea, dyspepsia and urinary retention. Example: dry mouth grades per CTCAE: Grade 1=symptomatic without significant dietary alteration; unstimulated saliva flow \> 0.2 mL/min; Grade 2=symptomatic and significant oral intake alteration; unstimulated saliva flow 0.1 to 0.2 mL/min; Grade 3=symptoms leading to inability to adequately aliment orally; IV fluids, tube feedings or total parenteral nutrition indicated; unstimulated saliva \< 0.1 mL/min.

Time frame: 4 weeks

Population: Extensive and poor metabolizers are the two cohorts being compared. These cohorts were determined based on their CYP2D6 sequence. Only 58 subjects have data as 3 participants' sequencing did not yield a definitive metabolizer status.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Extensive MetabolizersPercentage With Moderate to Severe Anticipated Drug Associated Adverse Events14.8 percentage of participants
Poor MetabolizersPercentage With Moderate to Severe Anticipated Drug Associated Adverse Events0.0 percentage of participants
Comparison: Null hypothesis was that there was no difference in the rate of moderate to severe adverse events.p-value: 195% CI: [0.76, 0.95]Fisher Exact

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026