Skip to content

Efficacy and Safety of Etelcalcetide (AMG 416) in the Treatment of Secondary Hyperparathyroidism (SHPT) in Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease on Hemodialysis

A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Phase 3 Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of AMG 416 in the Treatment of Secondary Hyperparathyroidism in Subjects With Chronic Kidney Disease on Hemodialysis

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01785849
Enrollment
508
Registered
2013-02-07
Start date
2013-03-12
Completion date
2014-06-12
Last updated
2019-08-26

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hyperparathyroidism, Secondary

Keywords

Secondary Hyperparathyroidism (SHPT), chronic kidney disease (CKD), hemodialysis, parathyroid hormone (PTH), hypocalcemia, bone and mineral metabolism

Brief summary

This study is designed to assess the efficacy and safety of etelcalcetide compared with placebo in the treatment of SHPT in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) receiving hemodialysis.

Interventions

Administered intravenously three times per week. The starting dose was 5 mg. The dose may have been increased at 4-week intervals by 2.5 mg or 5 mg on the basis of the predialysis parathyroid hormone and corrected calcium concentrations obtained in the prior week. The minimum dose was 2.5 mg and the maximum dose was 15 mg.

DRUGPlacebo

Administered intravenously (IV) three times per week.

Sponsors

Amgen
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 100 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Subject understands the study procedures and agrees to participate in the study by giving written informed consent. * Subject is 18 years of age or older. * Subject must be receiving hemodialysis 3 times weekly for at least 3 months * Subject agrees to not participate in another study of an investigational agent during the study. * Other Inclusion Criteria may apply

Exclusion criteria

* Currently receiving treatment in another investigational device or drug study, or ended treatment on another investigational device or drug study(s) within 8 weeks prior to screening. * Other investigational procedures while participating in this study are excluded. * Anticipated or scheduled parathyroidectomy during the study period. * Subject has received a parathyroidectomy within 3 months prior to dosing. * Anticipated or scheduled kidney transplant during the study period. * Subject has known sensitivity to any of the products or components to be administered during dosing. * Subject has participated in a prior clinical trial of AMG 416 (also referred to as KAI-4169). * Subject has received cinacalcet within the 4 weeks prior to screening labs (treatment with cinacalcet is prohibited during the study). * Subject has an unstable medical condition based on medical history, physical examination, and routine laboratory tests, or is otherwise unstable in the judgment of the Investigator. * Other

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants With a > 30% Decrease From Baseline in Mean PTH During the Efficacy Assessment PhaseBaseline and the efficacy assessment phase (EAP; defined as Weeks 20 to 27, inclusive).Participants who did not have any scheduled assessments during the EAP were considered non-responders.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants With Mean Predialysis Parathyroid Hormone ≤ 300 pg/mL During the Efficacy Assessment PhaseBaseline and the efficacy assessment phase (Week 20 to Week 27)Participants who had no scheduled assessments during the EAP were considered non-responders.
Percent Change From Baseline in Predialysis PTH During the Efficacy Assessment PhaseBaseline and the Efficacy Assessment Phase (Week 20 to Week 27)
Percent Change From Baseline in Predialysis Corrected Calcium During the Efficacy Assessment PhaseBaseline and the efficacy assessment phase (Week 20 to Week 27)
Percent Change From Baseline in Predialysis Corrected Calcium Phosphorus Product During the Efficacy Assessment PhaseBaseline and the efficacy assessment phase (Week 20 to Week 27)
Percent Change From Baseline in Predialysis Phosphorus During the Efficacy Assessment PhaseBaseline and the efficacy assessment phase (Week 20 to Week 27)

Countries

Australia, Austria, Belgium, Canada, Czechia, France, Germany, Hungary, Israel, Italy, Poland, Russia, Spain, United Kingdom, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

This study was conducted at 111 centers in the US, Canada, Europe, Israel, Russian Federation, and Australia. The first participant was enrolled on 12 March 2013 and the last participant enrolled on 08 November 2013.

Pre-assignment details

Eligible participants were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to etelcalcetide or placebo. Randomization was stratified by mean screening parathyroid hormone (PTH) (\< 600 pg/mL, 600 to ≤ 1000 pg/mL, and \> 1000 pg/mL), prior cinacalcet use and region (North America or non-North America).

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Placebo
Participants received placebo administered by intravenous bolus injection at the end of each hemodialysis session, three times per week (TIW) for 26 weeks.
254
Etelcalcetide
Participants received etelcalcetide administered by intravenous bolus injection at the end of each hemodialysis session, TIW, for 26 weeks. The starting dose was 5 mg and may have been increased at weeks 5, 9, 13 and 17 to achieve a predialysis PTH ≤ 300 pg/mL.
254
Total508

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyDeath79
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up1011
Overall StudyProtocol Specified Criteria291
Overall StudySponsor Decision01
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject1512

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicEtelcalcetidePlaceboTotal
Age, Continuous58.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.6
57.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.5
57.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.6
Corrected Calcium9.65 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.66
9.61 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.6
9.63 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.63
Corrected Calcium Phosphorus Product (cCa x P)57.37 mg²/dL²
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.51
55.54 mg²/dL²
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.81
56.46 mg²/dL²
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.67
Parathyroid Hormone (PTH)848.7 pg/mL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 520.4
819.7 pg/mL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 386
834.2 pg/mL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 457.9
Phosphorus5.95 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.59
5.78 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.6
5.87 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.59
Race
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 participants0 participants0 participants
Race
Asian
5 participants3 participants8 participants
Race
Black (or African American)
72 participants69 participants141 participants
Race
Missing
0 participants1 participants1 participants
Race
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 participants2 participants2 participants
Race
Other
4 participants4 participants8 participants
Race
White
173 participants175 participants348 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
103 Participants114 Participants217 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
151 Participants140 Participants291 Participants
Stratification Factor: Cinacalcet Use Within 8 Weeks of Randomization
No
221 participants220 participants441 participants
Stratification Factor: Cinacalcet Use Within 8 Weeks of Randomization
Yes
33 participants34 participants67 participants
Stratification Factor: Mean Screening Serum Parathyroid Hormone (PTH)
> 1000 pg/mL
52 participants56 participants108 participants
Stratification Factor: Mean Screening Serum Parathyroid Hormone (PTH)
< 600 pg/mL
87 participants84 participants171 participants
Stratification Factor: Mean Screening Serum Parathyroid Hormone (PTH)
≥ 600 to ≤ 1000 pg/mL
115 participants114 participants229 participants
Stratification Factor: Region
Non-North America
122 participants125 participants247 participants
Stratification Factor: Region
North America
132 participants129 participants261 participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
110 / 254194 / 251
serious
Total, serious adverse events
78 / 25468 / 251

Outcome results

Primary

Percentage of Participants With a > 30% Decrease From Baseline in Mean PTH During the Efficacy Assessment Phase

Participants who did not have any scheduled assessments during the EAP were considered non-responders.

Time frame: Baseline and the efficacy assessment phase (EAP; defined as Weeks 20 to 27, inclusive).

Population: The full analysis set, consisting of all randomized participants

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With a > 30% Decrease From Baseline in Mean PTH During the Efficacy Assessment Phase8.3 percentage of participants
EtelcalcetidePercentage of Participants With a > 30% Decrease From Baseline in Mean PTH During the Efficacy Assessment Phase74.0 percentage of participants
Comparison: A Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test stratified by screening PTH category (\< 600, ≥ 600 to ≤ 1000, and \> 1000 pg/mL), recent cinacalcet use within 8 weeks before randomization (yes and no), and region (North America and non-North America) was used to compare the primary endpoint of proportion of participants with \> 30% reduction from baseline in PTH during the EAP between etelcalcetide and placebo.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [18.71, 56.31]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Mean Predialysis Parathyroid Hormone ≤ 300 pg/mL During the Efficacy Assessment Phase

Participants who had no scheduled assessments during the EAP were considered non-responders.

Time frame: Baseline and the efficacy assessment phase (Week 20 to Week 27)

Population: Full analysis set

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Mean Predialysis Parathyroid Hormone ≤ 300 pg/mL During the Efficacy Assessment Phase5.1 percentage of participants
EtelcalcetidePercentage of Participants With Mean Predialysis Parathyroid Hormone ≤ 300 pg/mL During the Efficacy Assessment Phase49.6 percentage of participants
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [11.47, 42.48]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline in Predialysis Corrected Calcium During the Efficacy Assessment Phase

Time frame: Baseline and the efficacy assessment phase (Week 20 to Week 27)

Population: Full analysis set participants with observed data

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline in Predialysis Corrected Calcium During the Efficacy Assessment Phase1.18 percent changeStandard Error 0.29
EtelcalcetidePercent Change From Baseline in Predialysis Corrected Calcium During the Efficacy Assessment Phase-7.29 percent changeStandard Error 0.53
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-9.52, -7.23]Repeated Measures Mixed Effects Model
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline in Predialysis Corrected Calcium Phosphorus Product During the Efficacy Assessment Phase

Time frame: Baseline and the efficacy assessment phase (Week 20 to Week 27)

Population: Full analysis set participants with observed data

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline in Predialysis Corrected Calcium Phosphorus Product During the Efficacy Assessment Phase-0.19 percent changeStandard Error 1.44
EtelcalcetidePercent Change From Baseline in Predialysis Corrected Calcium Phosphorus Product During the Efficacy Assessment Phase-14.34 percent changeStandard Error 2.06
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-19.73, -10.25]Repeated Measures Mixed Effects Model
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline in Predialysis Phosphorus During the Efficacy Assessment Phase

Time frame: Baseline and the efficacy assessment phase (Week 20 to Week 27)

Population: Full analysis set participants with observed data

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline in Predialysis Phosphorus During the Efficacy Assessment Phase-1.31 percent changeStandard Deviation 1.42
EtelcalcetidePercent Change From Baseline in Predialysis Phosphorus During the Efficacy Assessment Phase-7.71 percent changeStandard Deviation 2.16
p-value: 0.00395% CI: [-12.31, -2.59]Repeated Measures Mixed Effects Model
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline in Predialysis PTH During the Efficacy Assessment Phase

Time frame: Baseline and the Efficacy Assessment Phase (Week 20 to Week 27)

Population: Full analysis set participants with observed data

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline in Predialysis PTH During the Efficacy Assessment Phase13.00 percent changeStandard Error 2.81
EtelcalcetidePercent Change From Baseline in Predialysis PTH During the Efficacy Assessment Phase-55.11 percent changeStandard Error 1.94
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-77.77, -64.46]Repeated Measures Mixed Effects Model

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 25, 2026