Skip to content

IMPACT - Integrative Medicine PrimAry Care Trial

IMPACT: Integrative Medicine PrimAry Care Trial: A Comparative Effectiveness Study of an Integrative Primary Care Clinic

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01785485
Acronym
IMPACT
Enrollment
500
Registered
2013-02-07
Start date
2013-02-28
Completion date
2015-10-31
Last updated
2013-02-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Adult Primary Care Patients

Keywords

Integrative medicine, primary care, cost-effectiveness

Brief summary

This study is Phase II of a project by the University of Arizona Center for Integrative Medicine (AzCIM). Collaborating with AzCIM is the Health Outcomes and Pharmacoeconomics (HOPE) Center and the RAND Corporation, Inc. Phase II is a prospective evaluation of the clinical and cost effectiveness (outcomes) of an integrative medicine professional practice model for adult primary care delivery (the University of Arizona Integrative Health Center - UAIHC in Phoenix, AZ). Data will be gathered from eligible and consenting members of UAIHC. In addition, a fidelity evaluation will assess whether the practice model was implemented as planned. The specific aims are to: 1) Recruit, consent, and enroll a sample of eligible patient and staff participants from UAIHC; 2) Conduct outcome evaluation of UAIHC care using patient data from medical records abstractions, self-report assessments, clinic administrative and service utilization/encounter data, and health insurance claims data; and, 3) Conduct fidelity evaluation of the implementation of the UAIHC model as described in its business plan using patient- and staff-reported fidelity assessments, random chart audits, and abstracted clinic administrative data. Participants. 1) Participants from the clinic patient population for whom clinical and cost outcomes will be tracked (n=500); 2) Clinic patients from whom fidelity data will be collected (n=180); and, 3) Clinic personnel from whom fidelity data will also be collected (n=14). Data Collection. For outcomes evaluation, data will be collected at baseline (initial clinic visit), and at 3-, 6-, and 12-month follow up periods. Sources include clinical symptoms and biomarkers from medical records abstractions; patient reported outcomes and satisfaction questionnaires; clinic service encounter logs; and, cost data from health insurance claims information and clinic financial data. For fidelity evaluation, data will be collected monthly for 6 months after study start, quarterly for the next 6 months, and semi-annually from then on. Patient data for fidelity will be gathered on a single randomized day of the week using a self-administered patient feedback questionnaire. For personnel, fidelity data will be collected at the same intervals using a self-administered provider perceptions questionnaire of inter-professional team and integrative medical care. Data from audits of randomly selected patient charts and administrative records will also be used.

Interventions

OTHERIntegrative medicine primary care model

An integrative medicine primary medical care as defined by the Arizona Center for Integrative Medicine.

Sponsors

University of Arizona
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
CASE_CONTROL
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

Outcomes Study Sample: Inclusion Criteria: * Enrollment in primary care (members) at UAIHC; * Adults age 18 or older.

Exclusion criteria

* Currently pregnant at time of recruitment; * Patients who attend the UAIHC clinic as consultation-only patients; * Significant cognitive impairment to the extent that the individual is unable to understand consent and respond to questionnaires. Fidelity Study Sample (Patients): Inclusion Criteria: * Enrollment in primary care (members) at UAIHC; * Adults age 18 or older.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Total healthcare costs from the payer's perspective-total paid costs according to claims data.12 months of paid costs pre and post beginning membership at UAIHC

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
1. Self-report instrumentsBaseline, 3-, 6-, and 12-monthsComposite: Short Form -12 (Ware, 1996) WHO-5 Well-being Index (Bech, 2003) Perceived Stress Scale (Cohen 1983). Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (Reilly, 1993). Patient Activation Measure (Hibbard, 2004). Diet quality. Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System Fruits/Vegetables (CDC, 2012). Physical Activity. Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System Physical Activity (CDC, 2012). Stress burden (Littman, 2006). Depression. PHQ-2 (Kroenke, 2003). Anxiety Disorder. GAD-2 (Kroenke, 2007). Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (Buysse, 1989). Fatigue visual analogue scale. Fatigue Severity Scale (Krupp, 1989). Pain visual analogue scale. If diagnosed: Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire-R (Williams & Arnold, 2011); Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (Roland & Morris, 1983); PHQ 9 (Kroenke et al 2002); GAD 7 (Spitzer et al, 2006). Demographics (Baseline). Expectations for care (Baseline). Patient satisfaction. 2-items from the CAHPS (AHRQ, 2012).
Clinical indicators and biomarkers3-, 6-, and 12-monthsComposite: Complete metabolic panel, hypoglycemic medication, full lipid panel (TC, HDL, fasting triglycerides), lipid medication, TSH/T4, HbA1c, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, hypertension medication, BMI (height & weight), waist circumference, body fat composition, smoking status, cardiovascular disease risk (general and events), metabolic syndrome diagnosis.
Service Utilization Data and Health Insurance Claims Data3-, 6-, and 12-months; biennially

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Provider Experiences (Fidelity)Monthly for the first 6 months, then each 3 months for the rest of the first year, then every 6 monthsComposite: Team Climate Inventory Short Version (TCI - Anderson & West, 1995; Loo & Loewen, 2002). Additional items were derived from a study of integrative medicine team practice (Gaboury, et al, 2010). Items on integrative team collaboration, integrative treatment planning, personal development, and clinical skills development were developed for the study.
Medical records chart audit (Fidelity)Monthly for the first 6 months, then each Monthly first 6 months then q. 3 months for the rest of the first year, then every 6 monthsComposite: Evidence of principles and best practices of integrative medicine: Whole person assessment and treatment; patient-practitioner health partnership; use of both conventional and CAM methods; health promotion and prevention interventions; use of natural and least invasive treatments where possible (support for body's innate healing capacity); patient personal care support team/team-based approach; extended visits/spending adequate time with patients; access to comprehensive, integrated, care.
Patient Experiences (Fidelity)Monthly for the first 6 mos., then each 3 months for the rest of the first year, then every 6 months.Composite: Dimensions assessed: access to care, whole person care, promotion of self-care and wellness, practitioner communication style, shared decision-making, trust in the practitioner, perceived practitioner empathy, perceived health partnership, and demographic information (CAHPS - AHRQ, 2012; ACES - Safran et al, 1998); CARE - Mercer, et al, 2004).

Countries

United States

Contacts

Primary ContactTBA
Backup ContactSally E Dodds
sdodds1@email.arizona.edu520-621-6807

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 20, 2026