Skip to content

Extracorporeal Lung Assist to Avoid Intubation in Patients Failing Noninvasive Ventilation for Hypercapnic ARF

Extracorporeal Lung Assist to Avoid Intubation in Patients Failing Noninvasive Ventilation for Acute Hypercapnic Respiratory Failure

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01784367
Acronym
ECLAIR
Enrollment
50
Registered
2013-02-05
Start date
2012-12-31
Completion date
2015-04-30
Last updated
2024-08-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hypercapnia, Respiratory Insufficiency

Keywords

Hypercapnia, noninvasive ventilation, acute respiratory failure, endotracheal intubation, invasive mechanical ventilation

Brief summary

The study´s intention is to evaluate the feasibility, safety and effectiveness of a pump driven extracorporeal device for removal of carbon dioxide from the blood in oder to avoid intubation and invasive mechanical ventilation in patients with acute respiratory failure retaining carbon dioxide due to the failure of their ventilatory muscle pump and not responding to prior non-invasive mask ventilation.

Detailed description

The study´s intention is to evaluate the feasibility, safety and effectiveness of a pump driven extracorporeal device for removal of carbon dioxide from the blood in oder to avoid intubation and invasive mechanical ventilation in patients with acute respiratory failure retaining carbon dioxide due to the failure of their ventilatory muscle pump and not responding to prior non-invasive mask ventilation. Since intubation with subsequent (prolonged) invasive mechanical ventilation is associated with considerable side effects this new strategy has the potential to improve overall clinical outcome in this selected patient group.

Interventions

DEVICEvv-ECCO2R (Novalung GmbH, Germany)

Treatment with the extracorporeal lung assist (ECLA) The ECLA is a pump driven (centrifugal pump) venovenous circuit, which removes carbon dioxide from the patients blood by means of a membrane through which the patients blood runs on the one side of the membrane and sweep gas on the other side removing the patient´s carbon dioxide. Blood flow range from 0.5 to 4.5 l/min and sweep gas flow between 1 and 10 l/min. At blood flows of 2 l/min and higher the device also oxygenates the patients blood. The diameter and length of cannulas and the sites of venous insertions are left to the decision of the treating physician. Cannulas are inserted in seldinger technique under sterile conditions. Function and patency of the extracorporeal circuit requires mild therapeutic anticoagulation.

Sponsors

Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* acute or acute-on-chronic hypercapnic respiratory insufficiency (pH ≤ 7,35, PaCO2 \> 45 mmHg) * failure of noninvasive ventilation * fulfilling criteria for endotracheal intubation

Exclusion criteria

* under 18 years of age * prior inclusion in other interventional study * pregnancy * heparin allergy or heparin-induced thrombocytopenia type 2 * on home non-invasive ventilator * Do not resuscitate order or moribund condition * life expectancy less than 6 months * no informed consent available

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Patients With Need for Intubation for Invasive Mechanical Ventilation21 daysThe number of patients in the ECLA-group who had to be intubated and mechanically ventilated under the given criteria for inclusion and exclusion is collected. Since every patient in the matched control group was intubated, the comparison of the groups shows whether the use of a pump-driven venovenous extracorporeal lung assist can reduce the frequency of intubation and mechanical ventilation.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Length of Non-invasive Ventilation90 daysThe duration of non-invasive ventilation up to day 90 is used to evaluate the respiratory outcomes of ECLA versus invasive mechanical ventilation.
Complication Rates90 daysMajor complication associated with the pump driven extracorporeal lung assist device or with non-invasive or invasive mechanical ventilation or any associated treatments during the observational period
Length of Invasive Mechanical Ventilation if Intubated90 daysDescribes the length of invasive mechanical ventilation in days, in case intubation and mechanical ventilation became necessary
Length of Stay in ICU90 daysDescribes the length of stay in ICU
Mortality90 daysComparison of 90-day mortality between the study arms. Seven patients died in each of the two arms after 90 days, so the stated values are correct.

Countries

Germany

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
ECLA Group
Treatment with a pump driven, venovenous extracorporeal lung assist vv-ECCO2R (Novalung GmbH, Germany): Treatment with the extracorporeal lung assist (ECLA) The ECLA is a pump driven (centrifugal pump) venovenous circuit, which removes carbon dioxide from the patients blood by means of a membrane through which the patients blood runs on the one side of the membrane and sweep gas on the other side removing the patient´s carbon dioxide. Blood flow range from 0.5 to 4.5 l/min and sweep gas flow between 1 and 10 l/min. At blood flows of 2 l/min and higher the device also oxygenates the patients blood. The diameter and length of cannulas and the sites of venous insertions are left to the decision of the treating physician. Cannulas are inserted in seldinger technique under sterile conditions. Function and patency of the extracorporeal circuit requires mild therapeutic anticoagulation.
25
Control Group
Control patients were identified and their data retrospectively collected from a large patient database at the principal study centre. The control patients had also been admitted to Intensive Care Unit with hypercapnic ventilatory failure and subsequently failed non-invasive ventilation (NIV) treatment followed by intubation and invasive mechanical ventilation. Matching criteria for the historical controls were acute diagnosis leading to hypercapnic respiratory failure, age (±10), SAPS-II score (±6) on ICU admission and pH (±0.06) at the time of NIV failure.
25
Total50

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicECLA GroupControl GroupTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
15 Participants15 Participants30 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
10 Participants10 Participants20 Participants
Age, Continuous67 years68 years67 years
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
25 Participants25 Participants50 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Austria
2 participants0 participants2 participants
Region of Enrollment
Germany
21 participants25 participants46 participants
Region of Enrollment
Netherlands
2 participants0 participants2 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
13 Participants12 Participants25 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
12 Participants13 Participants25 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
7 / 257 / 25
other
Total, other adverse events
4 / 258 / 25
serious
Total, serious adverse events
11 / 252 / 25

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Patients With Need for Intubation for Invasive Mechanical Ventilation

The number of patients in the ECLA-group who had to be intubated and mechanically ventilated under the given criteria for inclusion and exclusion is collected. Since every patient in the matched control group was intubated, the comparison of the groups shows whether the use of a pump-driven venovenous extracorporeal lung assist can reduce the frequency of intubation and mechanical ventilation.

Time frame: 21 days

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
ECLA-groupNumber of Patients With Need for Intubation for Invasive Mechanical Ventilation11 Participants
Control GroupNumber of Patients With Need for Intubation for Invasive Mechanical Ventilation25 Participants
Secondary

Complication Rates

Major complication associated with the pump driven extracorporeal lung assist device or with non-invasive or invasive mechanical ventilation or any associated treatments during the observational period

Time frame: 90 days

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
ECLA-groupComplication Rates11 Participants
Control GroupComplication Rates2 Participants
Secondary

Length of Invasive Mechanical Ventilation if Intubated

Describes the length of invasive mechanical ventilation in days, in case intubation and mechanical ventilation became necessary

Time frame: 90 days

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
ECLA-groupLength of Invasive Mechanical Ventilation if Intubated8.3 days
Control GroupLength of Invasive Mechanical Ventilation if Intubated13.7 days
Secondary

Length of Non-invasive Ventilation

The duration of non-invasive ventilation up to day 90 is used to evaluate the respiratory outcomes of ECLA versus invasive mechanical ventilation.

Time frame: 90 days

Population: As the control group receives 100% invasive mechanical ventilation by definition, this group is not analysed.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
ECLA-groupLength of Non-invasive Ventilation4.6 days
Secondary

Length of Stay in ICU

Describes the length of stay in ICU

Time frame: 90 days

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
ECLA-groupLength of Stay in ICU28.9 days
Control GroupLength of Stay in ICU24.0 days
Secondary

Mortality

Comparison of 90-day mortality between the study arms. Seven patients died in each of the two arms after 90 days, so the stated values are correct.

Time frame: 90 days

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
ECLA-groupMortality7 Participants
Control GroupMortality7 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 12, 2026