Skip to content

Traumatic Optic Neuropathy Treatment Trial (TONTT)

Study of Visual Recovery After Erythropoietin (EPO) Injection, in Patients With Traumatic Optic Neuropathy (TON)

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 1Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01783847
Acronym
TONTT
Enrollment
117
Registered
2013-02-05
Start date
2015-02-28
Completion date
2017-02-28
Last updated
2019-05-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Traumatic Optic Neuropathy

Keywords

Erythropoietin, Traumatic Optic Neuropathy, Visual function

Brief summary

The pathophysiology of Traumatic Optic Neuropathy (TON) is thought to be multifactorial, and some researchers have also postulated a primary and secondary mechanism of injury.TON is categorized as direct or indirect.In indirect TON cases, the injury to the axons is thought to be induced by shearing forces that are transmitted to the fibers or to the vascular supply of the nerve. Studies have shown that forces applied to the frontal bone and malar eminences are transferred and concentrated in the area near the optic canal. The tight adherence of the optic nerve's dural sheath to the periosteum within the optic canal is also thought to contribute to this segment of the nerve being extremely susceptible to the deformative stresses of the skull bones. Such injury leads to ischemic injury to the axons of the retinal ganglion cells within the optic canal. At present, no studies validate a particular approach to the management of TON. There are three management lines for these patients that include 1)observation only;2)medical treatment with high or megadoses of methylprednisolone; and 3)surgical intervention. Generally no line precedes the others and additionally, medical or surgical interventions may result in serious side effects or complications. In 2005, the results of the Corticosteroid Randomization after Significant Head Injury (CRASH) trial raised concerns regarding the use of mega dose steroids in traumatic brain injury. This study was the largest randomized study that evaluated steroids in patients with traumatic brain injury and was stopped early due to the significantly increased risk of death in patients that received mega dose steroids at their 6-month follow-up when compared with the placebo group (25.7% vs 22.3%; Relative Risk 1.15 Confidence Interval 1.07 to 1.24; p=0.0001). Although the etiology of the increased risk of death was not determined, the findings of this study should be taken into consideration when managing cases of TON with concurrent traumatic brain injury. Very recently it has been shown the cytokine hormone erythropoietin (EPO) that had been long known and used as a valuable agent to promote hematopoiesis has been protective in experimental models of mechanical trauma, neuroinflammation, cerebral and retinal ischemia, and even in a human stroke trial, and most notably in optic nerve transection. A double blind placebo-controlled multicenter trial on EPO add-on treatment in chronic schizophrenic men was performed. Treatment over 12 weeks with high-dose weekly (40,000 IU intravenously) EPO led to significant improvement of cognitive performance compared to placebo controls. Different studies have been performed on the effect of EPO on neuropathy in different studies. The investigators recently published our results on treating patients with TON with EPO and found it safe and effective. Patients were compared with a historical control group of patients who received no treatment for TON. A better visual recovery was found. The aim of this study is to determine the effectiveness of EPO on TON in a Multi- center clinical trial using a semi-experimental design.

Interventions

OTHERObservation

Just observation

250 mg every 6 hours for 3 days.

Sponsors

Iran University of Medical Sciences
CollaboratorOTHER
Mashhad University of Medical Sciences
CollaboratorOTHER
Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences
CollaboratorOTHER
Tehran University of Medical Sciences
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Caregiver)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
5 Years to 90 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Having indirect traumatic optic neuropathy, not more than 3 weeks between trauma and treatment, normal fundoscopy

Exclusion criteria

* Having other injuries that effect on visual function, direct optic neuropathy, glaucoma, diabetic retinopathy, uncontrolled hypertension, polycythemia, creatinin more than 3 mg/dl, sensitivity to EPO, hyperkalemia, women who use contraceptive pill, pregnant and breast feeding women, history of stroke and cardiovascular diseases, having malignancy

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants With Change/Improvement Visual Acuity From the BeselineChange from baseline at least 3 months after treatmentBest corrected visual acuity will measure at 1,2,3 days, 1 week, 2 weeks and 1 month and at least 3 months after treatment. Improvement is defined based on 1) mean logMAR\[12\], 2) 0.3 change in logMAR (improvement, deterioration, and no change) \[12,16\] , 3) mean improvement percentage which is calculated as: improvement%= (logMar ( of VA after treatment)-logMar ( of initial VA))/(logMar(20/13)˟-logMar ( of initial VA) 4) percentage of patients at different ordinal categorization of the BCVA as no light perception (NLP), light perception (LP)and hand motion (HM), count fingers (CF), and ≥ 20/200.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants With Relative Afferent Papillary Defect (RAPD) Grade +4Change from baseline at least 3 months after treatmentA positive RAPD means there are differences between the two eyes in the afferent pathway due to retinal or optic nerve disease. Graded from +1 to +4. The higher one is a better grade

Countries

Iran

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Recombinant Human Erythropoietin (EPO)
20,000 unit per day of EPO, Intravenous infusion for three sequential days. Recombinant human erythropoietin (EPO): 4000 units per vial
85
Methylprednisolone
1 gram per day intravenous injection of Methylprednisolone for 3 days.
16
Observation
No any treatment will be given
16
Total117

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicMethylprednisoloneObservationRecombinant Human Erythropoietin (EPO)Total
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
6 Participants4 Participants20 Participants30 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
10 Participants12 Participants64 Participants86 Participants
Age, Continuous23.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.4
29.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.7
28.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.9
27.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.4
Region of Enrollment
Iran, Islamic Republic of
16 participants16 participants85 participants117 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
0 Participants3 Participants11 Participants14 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
16 Participants13 Participants74 Participants103 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 690 / 150 / 16
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 690 / 150 / 16
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 690 / 150 / 16

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Participants With Change/Improvement Visual Acuity From the Beseline

Best corrected visual acuity will measure at 1,2,3 days, 1 week, 2 weeks and 1 month and at least 3 months after treatment. Improvement is defined based on 1) mean logMAR\[12\], 2) 0.3 change in logMAR (improvement, deterioration, and no change) \[12,16\] , 3) mean improvement percentage which is calculated as: improvement%= (logMar ( of VA after treatment)-logMar ( of initial VA))/(logMar(20/13)˟-logMar ( of initial VA) 4) percentage of patients at different ordinal categorization of the BCVA as no light perception (NLP), light perception (LP)and hand motion (HM), count fingers (CF), and ≥ 20/200.

Time frame: Change from baseline at least 3 months after treatment

Population: Seventeen patients with incomplete follow up and not following the treatment protocol were also excluded during the study. There were 100 patients (100 eyes) who completed the study protocol

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Recombinant Human Erythropoietin (EPO)Number of Participants With Change/Improvement Visual Acuity From the Beseline28 Participants
MethylprednisoloneNumber of Participants With Change/Improvement Visual Acuity From the Beseline3 Participants
ObservationNumber of Participants With Change/Improvement Visual Acuity From the Beseline5 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Relative Afferent Papillary Defect (RAPD) Grade +4

A positive RAPD means there are differences between the two eyes in the afferent pathway due to retinal or optic nerve disease. Graded from +1 to +4. The higher one is a better grade

Time frame: Change from baseline at least 3 months after treatment

Population: Seventeen patients dropped out of the study due to incomplete follow-up (16 patients from EPO and one patient from Methylprednisolone group)

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Recombinant Human Erythropoietin (EPO)Number of Participants With Relative Afferent Papillary Defect (RAPD) Grade +426 Participants
MethylprednisoloneNumber of Participants With Relative Afferent Papillary Defect (RAPD) Grade +47 Participants
ObservationNumber of Participants With Relative Afferent Papillary Defect (RAPD) Grade +48 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026