Skip to content

Effects of Brain Stimulation During a Daytime Nap on Memory Consolidation in Patients With Mild Cognitive Impairment

Impact of Transcranial Slow Oscillating Stimulation on Memory Consolidation During Slow Wave Sleep of a Daytime Nap in Patients With Mild Cognitive Impairment(MCI)

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01782365
Enrollment
16
Registered
2013-02-01
Start date
2013-08-08
Completion date
2016-08-30
Last updated
2021-05-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Mild Cognitive Impairment, So Stated

Keywords

mild cognitive impairment, dementia, MCI, brain stimulation, tSOS, tDCS, sleep, nap, daytime sleep, memory, memory consolidation

Brief summary

The beneficial effect of nocturnal as well as daytime sleep on memory consolidation is well-documented in young, healthy subjects. Slow wave sleep (SWS), in particular, with its slow oscillating activity have shown to enhance declarative, hippocampus-dependent memory representations. This impact of sleep on memory performance can be additionally enhanced by exogeneous induction of transcranial slow oscillating stimulation (tSOS) within the frequency range of SWS in humans (0,7- 0,8 Hz) during sleep, as has been demonstrated in young, healthy subjects. If patients with amnestic mild cognitive impairment (MCI)- usually characterized by initial difficulties in hippocampus dependent memory functions - benefit from transcranial slow oscillatory stimulation (tSOS) during sleep as well has not been studied so far. The primary goal of the study is therefore to investigate the impact of oscillating current stimulation (tSOS) during a daytime nap on declarative memory consolidation in MCI patients.

Interventions

DEVICESHAM stimulation

no stimulation

DEVICE0,75 Hz stimulation

Sponsors

Charite University, Berlin, Germany
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
50 Years to 90 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* amnestic and amnestic plus MCI-patients: 1. Concern reflecting a change in cognition reported by patient or informant or clinician (i.e., historical or observed evidence of decline over time) 2. Objective evidence of memory impairment; additional cognitive domains may be affected as well; 3. Preservation of independence in functional abilities 4. no dementia * age: 50-90 years

Exclusion criteria

* untreated severe internal or psychiatric diseases * epilepsy * other severe neurological diseases eg., previous major stroke, brain tumour * dementia * contraindications to MRI

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Retention of declarative memories after 0.75 Hz stimulation during SWS, vs after sham stimulation during SWS4 WeeksRetention between stimulation conditions (0.75 Hz during SWS, vs sham stimulation during SWS) in the declarative memory task.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Amount of Slow wave Sleep, spindels, eeg-correlates, further memory systems4 Weeks1. Amount of slow wave sleep assessed by standard polysomnographic criteria in 0,75 Hz vs SHAM stimulation during SWS. 2. Spindel activity during sleep indicated via several spindel parameters like number, duration, frequency of spindles; compared between 0,75 Hz and SHAM stimulation during SWS. 3. Neuronal correlates (EEG-power in slow oscillation frequency bands induced by 0,75 Hz vs SHAM stimulation during SWS; EEG-correlates of encoding and retrieval of a declarative memory task). 4. Performance in further memory systems (procedural), compared between 0,75 Hz and SHAM stimulation during SWS.

Countries

Germany

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 16, 2026