Skip to content

Acellular Dermal Matrix in Tissue Expander Breast Reconstruction: A Prospective, Randomized, Clinical Trial Comparing SurgiMend PRS and AlloDerm RTU

Acellular Dermal Matrix in Tissue Expander Breast Reconstruction: A Prospective, Randomized, Clinical Trial Comparing SurgiMend PRS and AlloDerm RTU

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01781299
Enrollment
9
Registered
2013-01-31
Start date
2012-09-30
Completion date
2015-09-30
Last updated
2017-05-12

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Breast Cancer, Mastectomy

Keywords

Breast Cancer, Mastectomy, Immediate reconstruction

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to assess the relative performance and complication rates between the AlloDerm RTU and SurgiMend PRS products as well as the relative economics of these two treatment options.

Detailed description

In recent years, acellular dermal matrix (ADM) products have increasingly been utilized in breast reconstruction in order to protect the implant from exposure under a thin mastectomy skin flap while also allowing better control of the inframammary fold and, therefore, a better cosmetic result. In current clinical practice, cost is a factor in considering procedures and adjunct products. AlloDerm RTU and SurgiMend PRS are dissimilar in cost, with AlloDerm RTU more costly by 30-50%, and it is unclear if they are similar in efficacy. This study will be a prospective, randomized-to-test article (ADM), controlled, blinded-to-aesthetic/biopsy specimen evaluator trial. It will provide a way to assess the relative performance and complication rates between the AlloDerm RTU and SurgiMend PRS product as well as the relative economics of these two treatment options. Study subjects will only be randomized to one of two surgical mesh products. Patient information including age, BMI, smoking history, tumor size and location, preoperative bra cup size, mastectomy specimen weight, mastectomy method, plastic surgeon, mastectomy surgeon, quality of skin, tissue expander type and maximal volume, intra-operative fill volume, gel/saline implant type and size, chemotherapy, and radiation therapy will be summarized.

Interventions

Sponsors

University of Pittsburgh
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Intervention model description

We are looking at 2 products called Acellular Dermal Matrix (ADM) implant to evaluate the outcomes of 2 specific ADM products: SurgiMend PRS and AlloDerm RTU.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Subject's with ability to provide informed consent. 2. Subjects greater than 18 years old 3. Subjects to undergo an immediate tissue expander reconstruction following mastectomy; and 4. Subjects who are, in the opinion of the Investigator, able to understand the study, comply with the study design and are willing to return to the clinic for all the research required follow-up visits.

Exclusion criteria

1. Subjects less than 18 years of age 2. Subjects that based on surgeon's discretion cannot be effectively reconstructed with the use of ADM product 3. Pregnancy 4. Bovine allergy

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Complication Rates3 yearsTo determine the complication rate for tissue expander breast reconstruction patients using SurgiMend PRS and AlloDerm RTU ADM products. Time points include: After first procedure: 10-14 days, then 2, 4, 6, and 10 weeks after drain removal; After second procedure: 1-2 weeks, 6 weeks, 1 year, and 3 years.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Aesthetic Evaluation3 years following permanent implant placement.Initial aesthetic evaluation will occur at approximately 6 weeks after permanent implant placement. Re-evaluation will occur at 1 and 3 years following permanent implant placement. This will involve physical examination, 2D photographs, and patient Breast-Q self-examination. Breast-Q examination is on a scale of 25-100 with 25 questions on a scale of 1-4 where 1 is very dissatisfied and 4 is very satisfied.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
AlloDerm RTU
Participants within this arm will have the acellular dermal matrix AlloDerm RTU implanted at the time of tissue expander placement. AlloDerm RTU
4
SurgiMend PRS
Participants within this arm will have the acellular dermal matrix SurgiMend PRS implanted at the time of tissue expander placement. SurgiMend PRS
5
Total9

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject01

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicAlloDerm RTUSurgiMend PRSTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
3 Participants5 Participants8 Participants
Age, Continuous57 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.8
42 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.9
48.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
3 Participants5 Participants8 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
4 Participants5 Participants9 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
4 participants5 participants9 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
4 Participants5 Participants9 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 40 / 5
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 40 / 5

Outcome results

Primary

Complication Rates

To determine the complication rate for tissue expander breast reconstruction patients using SurgiMend PRS and AlloDerm RTU ADM products. Time points include: After first procedure: 10-14 days, then 2, 4, 6, and 10 weeks after drain removal; After second procedure: 1-2 weeks, 6 weeks, 1 year, and 3 years.

Time frame: 3 years

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
AlloDerm RTUComplication Rates4 Participants
SurgiMend PRSComplication Rates3 Participants
Secondary

Aesthetic Evaluation

Initial aesthetic evaluation will occur at approximately 6 weeks after permanent implant placement. Re-evaluation will occur at 1 and 3 years following permanent implant placement. This will involve physical examination, 2D photographs, and patient Breast-Q self-examination. Breast-Q examination is on a scale of 25-100 with 25 questions on a scale of 1-4 where 1 is very dissatisfied and 4 is very satisfied.

Time frame: 3 years following permanent implant placement.

Population: discrepancy is caused by funding ending and no data was collected from SurgiMend arm.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
AlloDerm RTUAesthetic Evaluation83.5 units on a scale

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026