Skip to content

The Beneficial Effects of Healthy Snacks on Appetite Control, Satiety, and Reward-driven Eating Behavior in Young People

The Beneficial Effects of Protein-rich, Afternoon Snacks on Appetite Control, Satiety, and Reward-driven Eating Behavior in Young People

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01781286
Enrollment
37
Registered
2013-01-31
Start date
2013-01-31
Completion date
2014-01-31
Last updated
2018-07-23

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Obesity

Keywords

Obesity, Snacking, Appetite, Protein, Soy, Reward driven eating, Satiety

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to examine the effects of normal vs. protein-rich afternoon snacks on appetite control, satiety, and reward-driven eating (particularly in the evening) in young people. Indices of attention and mood will also be assessed. Study hypotheses include the following: 1. The consumption of a high-protein, soy-rich afternoon snack will lead to significant improvements in appetite control and satiety, reductions in food motivation and reward, and will delay the drive to eat in normal to overweight young people. 2. The consumption of a high-protein, soy-rich afternoon snack will lead to reduced unhealthy, evening snacking, particularly on foods high in fat and/or sugar, in normal to overweight young people. 3. The daily consumption of a high-protein, soy-rich afternoon snack will lead to significant improvements in afternoon alertness, concentration, fatigue, and well-being in normal to overweight young people.

Detailed description

Forty adolescents will participate in the following randomized crossover-design study. Prior to the start of the study, the participants will be asked to document their habitual breakfast, lunch, and afternoon snack times. The snack patterns and associated testing days will be scheduled so that each participant consumes the afternoon snack (or refrains from snacking) 3 hours after lunch; however, the time of day when this occurs is based on the participant's previous, habitual snack time. Once this is determined, each participant will randomly acclimate to the following snack pattern for 3 consecutive days: 1) Higher Protein Soy-based Snacks (250 kcal; 40% Protein; 40% Carbohydrates; 20% Fat); 2) Typical, Low Protein Snacks (5% Protein; 50% Carbohydrates; 45% Fat); and 3) No Snack. On day 4, the participants will consume a standard breakfast, at home, and lunch, at school, and will come in to our facility 1 hour prior to their habitual snack time. The participants will be placed in a window-less, comfortable room, void of all time cues. They will be informed that they will remain in this room for the next 6 hours. The participants will begin the testing day by completing baseline questionnaires assessing appetite, satiety, mood, and cognitive function. A brain scan will be completed using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to identify brain activation patterns in response to food stimuli. Following the fMRI scan, the respective snack will be given to the participants; they will have 15 minutes to eat the snack. A second fMRI scan will then be performed. The participants will continue to complete the previous questionnaires until they voluntarily choose to eat. At this time, the volunteers will be presented with an 'all you can eat' snack buffet. They will be permitted to eat as much or as little as they would like to eat over the next 3-hour period. The participants will remain in the facility until the full 8-hour testing day is completed, regardless of when they requested to eat. Following the 6 hours, the participants will be permitted to leave the facility.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALHigh Protein

250 kcal; 40% Protein; 40% Carbohydrate; 20% Fat

BEHAVIORALLow Protein

5% Protein; 50% Carbohydrates; 45% Fat

Sponsors

Solae, LLC
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
University of Missouri-Columbia
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
13 Years to 19 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Age range 13-19 years * Normal to overweight (BMI: 50-85th percentile for BMI for age or BMI: 18-29.9 kg/m2) * No metabolic, psychological, or neurological diseases/conditions * Not currently or previously on a weight loss or other special diet (in the past 6 months) * Not clinically diagnosed with an eating disorder * Habitually eat (i.e., at least 5 times/week) breakfast between 7:00-9:00 am, lunch between 11:00 am-1:00 pm, an afternoon snack between 2:00-4:00 pm, and dinner * No food allergies or intolerances to soy products * Rates the overall liking of the study snack foods higher than Neither Like nor Dislike on the screening palatability questionnaire * Right handed

Exclusion criteria

* Age 12 years or younger, or 20 years or older * Underweight or Obese (below 50th or above 85th percentile for BMI for age, or BMI below 18 or above 29.9 kg/m2) * Any metabolic, psychological, or neurological diseases/conditions * Currently or previously on a weight loss or other special diet (in the past 6 months) * Clinically diagnosed with an eating disorder * Does not habitually eat (i.e., at least 5 times/week) breakfast between 7:00-9:00 am, lunch between 11:00 am-1:00 pm, an afternoon snack between 2:00-4:00 pm, and dinner * Food allergies or intolerances to soy products * Does not rate the overall liking of the study snack foods higher than Neither Like nor Dislike on the screening palatability questionnaire * Not right handed

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Time to Dinner Request1 DayThe participants will be asked whether they would like to request a dinner buffet throughout the 5 h post-snack period. When the response is Yes, I want to eat right now, the time from snack consumption will be recorded.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Appetite Questionnaires0 min, + 30 min, +60 min, +90 min, +120 min, +150 min, +180 min, +210 min, +240 min, +270 min, +300 minComputerized questionnaires, assessing perceived sensations of appetite will be completed throughout the testing days. The questionnaires contain visual analog scales incorporating a 100 mm horizontal line rating scale for each response. The questions are worded as how strong is your feeling of with anchors of not all (scored as 0 out of 100) to extremely (scored as 100 out of 100). The following questions will be incorporated as 1 composite score ((Questions 1 + 3 + 4 - 2)/4) multiplied by the 300 minutes (a max of 30,000 mm\*min and a minimum of -30,000 mm\*min): 1. How strong is your feeling of hunger? 2. How strong is your feeling of being full? 3. How strong is your desire to eat? 4. How much food could you consume right now? The Adaptive Visual Analog Scale Software (Neurobehavioral Research Laboratory and Clinic; San Antonio, TX) was used for these assessments.
Snack Palatability and Perception Questionnaires5 minComputerized questionnaires, assessing snack palatability and perceptions of the snack will be completed during screening and after the first and last bite of each snack during the acclimation and testing days. The questionnaires contain visual analog scales incorporating a 100 mm horizontal line rating scale for each response. The questions are worded as how strong is your feeling of with anchors of not all (scores 0 out of 100) to extremely (scores 100 out of 100). The questions assess snack appearance, smell, flavor, texture (feel), liking. The Adaptive Visual Analog Scale Software (Neurobehavioral Research Laboratory and Clinic; San Antonio, TX) was used for these assessments.
Attention & Memory Questionnaires90 minCognitive function will be assessed immediately before (-30 min) and 60 min post-snack using the lap-top based Cantab® computerized assessment system. This program consisted of a core battery of tests grouped into main categories including 1) Working Memory; 2) Reasoning; 3) Executive Function; 4) Reaction Time; 5) Sustained Attention; 6) Cognitive Flexibility; and 7) Processing Speed. This program has been used in our previous breakfast studies with success. A greater raw score for working memory, reasoning, executive function, sustained attention, and cognitive flexibility is considered to be greater performance. A lower score for reaction time and processing speed is considered to be greater performance. The raw scores are determined by Cantab® computerized assessment system. Therefore, maximum and minimum values for each test are unknown.
Mood-state Questionnaires-30 min, +60 minIndices of mood state will be assessed immediately before and 60 min post-snack using the on-line, Profile of Mood States, 2nd Edition (POMS2). This program consisted of a core battery of tests with the following sub-categories 1) Tension; 2) Depression; 3) Anger; 4) Vigor; 5) Fatigue; 6) Confusion; and 7) Friendliness. Outcomes are scored as a T-score which could be a minimum of zero with no upper limit. A lower score represents a more positive mood state and a higher score represents a more negative mood state.
Energy Intake+300 min, 24 hPost-snack energy intake will be assessed through ad libitum dinner and snacking assessments. The ad libitum dinner will contain approximately 2,000 kcal and will consist of a chicken, rice, and stir-fry meal, chips, chocolate mints, ice tea, and water. The dinner meal will be consumed in the testing facility. The participants will be instructed to eat as much as or as little as they choose over a 30 min period. All contents will be weighed before the dinner and any remains will be re-weighed afterwards to determine the type and quantity of foods consumed. The ad libitum evening snacks will contain 3,000 kcal and will include common snack foods. After the testing day is complete, the participants will take the snack packout home and consume any of the foods he/she chooses until going to bed. All contents will be weighed before the packout and any remains will be re-weighed afterwards to determine the type and quantity of foods consumed.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
All Study Participants
Each participant was randomly acclimated to the following snack patterns for 3 consecutive days: 1) Higher Protein Soy-based Snacks (250 kcal; 40% Protein; 40% Carbohydrates; 20% Fat); 2) Typical, Low Protein Snacks (5% Protein; 50% Carbohydrates; 45% Fat); and 3) No Snack. On day 4, participants completed all testing day procedures outlined in the study description.
31
Total31

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003FG004FG005
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up000001
Overall StudyNoncompliance000100
Overall StudyTime Constraints202000

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicAll Study Participants
Age, Continuous17 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1
BMI (%)58.4 Percentile
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.4
BMI (kg/m2)22.3 kg/m2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.4
Commonly consumed cereal as a snack25 % of total participants
Commonly consumed chips/crackers as a snack64 % of total participants
Commonly consumed fruit as a snack61 % of total participants
Frequency of Snacking6 days/week
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1
Height171 centimeters
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2
Region of Enrollment
United States
31 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
16 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
15 Participants
Weight65.6 kilograms
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.1

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 310 / 310 / 31
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 310 / 310 / 31

Outcome results

Primary

Time to Dinner Request

The participants will be asked whether they would like to request a dinner buffet throughout the 5 h post-snack period. When the response is Yes, I want to eat right now, the time from snack consumption will be recorded.

Time frame: 1 Day

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
High ProteinTime to Dinner Request158 minutesStandard Error 7
High Fat (Low Protein)Time to Dinner Request150 minutesStandard Error 6
No SnackTime to Dinner Request140 minutesStandard Error 6
Secondary

Appetite Questionnaires

Computerized questionnaires, assessing perceived sensations of appetite will be completed throughout the testing days. The questionnaires contain visual analog scales incorporating a 100 mm horizontal line rating scale for each response. The questions are worded as how strong is your feeling of with anchors of not all (scored as 0 out of 100) to extremely (scored as 100 out of 100). The following questions will be incorporated as 1 composite score ((Questions 1 + 3 + 4 - 2)/4) multiplied by the 300 minutes (a max of 30,000 mm\*min and a minimum of -30,000 mm\*min): 1. How strong is your feeling of hunger? 2. How strong is your feeling of being full? 3. How strong is your desire to eat? 4. How much food could you consume right now? The Adaptive Visual Analog Scale Software (Neurobehavioral Research Laboratory and Clinic; San Antonio, TX) was used for these assessments.

Time frame: 0 min, + 30 min, +60 min, +90 min, +120 min, +150 min, +180 min, +210 min, +240 min, +270 min, +300 min

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
High ProteinAppetite Questionnaires-5500 mm*minStandard Error 1000
High Fat (Low Protein)Appetite Questionnaires-3000 mm*minStandard Error 1000
No SnackAppetite Questionnaires3000 mm*minStandard Error 1000
Secondary

Attention & Memory Questionnaires

Cognitive function will be assessed immediately before (-30 min) and 60 min post-snack using the lap-top based Cantab® computerized assessment system. This program consisted of a core battery of tests grouped into main categories including 1) Working Memory; 2) Reasoning; 3) Executive Function; 4) Reaction Time; 5) Sustained Attention; 6) Cognitive Flexibility; and 7) Processing Speed. This program has been used in our previous breakfast studies with success. A greater raw score for working memory, reasoning, executive function, sustained attention, and cognitive flexibility is considered to be greater performance. A lower score for reaction time and processing speed is considered to be greater performance. The raw scores are determined by Cantab® computerized assessment system. Therefore, maximum and minimum values for each test are unknown.

Time frame: 90 min

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
High ProteinAttention & Memory QuestionnairesReaction Time (post-snack)103 Units on a ScaleStandard Error 3
High ProteinAttention & Memory QuestionnairesExecutive Function (pre-snack)108 Units on a ScaleStandard Error 3
High ProteinAttention & Memory QuestionnairesWorking Memory (post-snack)106 Units on a ScaleStandard Error 2
High ProteinAttention & Memory QuestionnairesReasoning (post-snack)106 Units on a ScaleStandard Error 2
High ProteinAttention & Memory QuestionnairesExecutive function (post-snack)113 Units on a ScaleStandard Error 2
High ProteinAttention & Memory QuestionnairesSustained Attention (post-snack)106 Units on a ScaleStandard Error 1
High ProteinAttention & Memory QuestionnairesWorking Memory (pre-snack)102 Units on a ScaleStandard Error 3
High ProteinAttention & Memory QuestionnairesReasoning (pre-snack)107 Units on a ScaleStandard Error 2
High ProteinAttention & Memory QuestionnairesCognitive Flexibility (post-snack)112 Units on a ScaleStandard Error 3
High ProteinAttention & Memory QuestionnairesProcessing Speed (post-snack)118 Units on a ScaleStandard Error 3
High ProteinAttention & Memory QuestionnairesReaction Time (pre-snack)106 Units on a ScaleStandard Error 3
High ProteinAttention & Memory QuestionnairesSustained Attention (pre-snack)102 Units on a ScaleStandard Error 2
High ProteinAttention & Memory QuestionnairesCognitive Flexibility (pre-snack)108 Units on a ScaleStandard Error 4
High ProteinAttention & Memory QuestionnairesProcessing Speed (pre-snack)110 Units on a ScaleStandard Error 3
High Fat (Low Protein)Attention & Memory QuestionnairesWorking Memory (pre-snack)106 Units on a ScaleStandard Error 2
High Fat (Low Protein)Attention & Memory QuestionnairesReasoning (pre-snack)108 Units on a ScaleStandard Error 2
High Fat (Low Protein)Attention & Memory QuestionnairesReaction Time (pre-snack)107 Units on a ScaleStandard Error 3
High Fat (Low Protein)Attention & Memory QuestionnairesCognitive Flexibility (pre-snack)114 Units on a ScaleStandard Error 2
High Fat (Low Protein)Attention & Memory QuestionnairesCognitive Flexibility (post-snack)116 Units on a ScaleStandard Error 2
High Fat (Low Protein)Attention & Memory QuestionnairesWorking Memory (post-snack)106 Units on a ScaleStandard Error 2
High Fat (Low Protein)Attention & Memory QuestionnairesReasoning (post-snack)110 Units on a ScaleStandard Error 2
High Fat (Low Protein)Attention & Memory QuestionnairesExecutive function (post-snack)116 Units on a ScaleStandard Error 2
High Fat (Low Protein)Attention & Memory QuestionnairesSustained Attention (pre-snack)105 Units on a ScaleStandard Error 1
High Fat (Low Protein)Attention & Memory QuestionnairesProcessing Speed (pre-snack)114 Units on a ScaleStandard Error 3
High Fat (Low Protein)Attention & Memory QuestionnairesExecutive Function (pre-snack)114 Units on a ScaleStandard Error 2
High Fat (Low Protein)Attention & Memory QuestionnairesReaction Time (post-snack)107 Units on a ScaleStandard Error 3
High Fat (Low Protein)Attention & Memory QuestionnairesProcessing Speed (post-snack)122 Units on a ScaleStandard Error 4
High Fat (Low Protein)Attention & Memory QuestionnairesSustained Attention (post-snack)105 Units on a ScaleStandard Error 1
No SnackAttention & Memory QuestionnairesSustained Attention (pre-snack)106 Units on a ScaleStandard Error 1
No SnackAttention & Memory QuestionnairesSustained Attention (post-snack)104 Units on a ScaleStandard Error 2
No SnackAttention & Memory QuestionnairesCognitive Flexibility (post-snack)112 Units on a ScaleStandard Error 2
No SnackAttention & Memory QuestionnairesProcessing Speed (post-snack)119 Units on a ScaleStandard Error 3
No SnackAttention & Memory QuestionnairesWorking Memory (post-snack)104 Units on a ScaleStandard Error 2
No SnackAttention & Memory QuestionnairesReasoning (pre-snack)105 Units on a ScaleStandard Error 2
No SnackAttention & Memory QuestionnairesExecutive Function (pre-snack)112 Units on a ScaleStandard Error 2
No SnackAttention & Memory QuestionnairesProcessing Speed (pre-snack)112 Units on a ScaleStandard Error 3
No SnackAttention & Memory QuestionnairesCognitive Flexibility (pre-snack)110 Units on a ScaleStandard Error 2
No SnackAttention & Memory QuestionnairesReaction Time (pre-snack)103 Units on a ScaleStandard Error 2
No SnackAttention & Memory QuestionnairesReasoning (post-snack)109 Units on a ScaleStandard Error 2
No SnackAttention & Memory QuestionnairesExecutive function (post-snack)112 Units on a ScaleStandard Error 2
No SnackAttention & Memory QuestionnairesWorking Memory (pre-snack)105 Units on a ScaleStandard Error 2
No SnackAttention & Memory QuestionnairesReaction Time (post-snack)105 Units on a ScaleStandard Error 3
Secondary

Energy Intake

Post-snack energy intake will be assessed through ad libitum dinner and snacking assessments. The ad libitum dinner will contain approximately 2,000 kcal and will consist of a chicken, rice, and stir-fry meal, chips, chocolate mints, ice tea, and water. The dinner meal will be consumed in the testing facility. The participants will be instructed to eat as much as or as little as they choose over a 30 min period. All contents will be weighed before the dinner and any remains will be re-weighed afterwards to determine the type and quantity of foods consumed. The ad libitum evening snacks will contain 3,000 kcal and will include common snack foods. After the testing day is complete, the participants will take the snack packout home and consume any of the foods he/she chooses until going to bed. All contents will be weighed before the packout and any remains will be re-weighed afterwards to determine the type and quantity of foods consumed.

Time frame: +300 min, 24 h

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
High ProteinEnergy Intake3080 kilojoulesStandard Error 230
High Fat (Low Protein)Energy Intake3370 kilojoulesStandard Error 290
No SnackEnergy Intake3170 kilojoulesStandard Error 240
Secondary

Mood-state Questionnaires

Indices of mood state will be assessed immediately before and 60 min post-snack using the on-line, Profile of Mood States, 2nd Edition (POMS2). This program consisted of a core battery of tests with the following sub-categories 1) Tension; 2) Depression; 3) Anger; 4) Vigor; 5) Fatigue; 6) Confusion; and 7) Friendliness. Outcomes are scored as a T-score which could be a minimum of zero with no upper limit. A lower score represents a more positive mood state and a higher score represents a more negative mood state.

Time frame: -30 min, +60 min

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
High ProteinMood-state QuestionnairesVigor (+60 min)44.2 T-ScoreStandard Error 1.9
High ProteinMood-state QuestionnairesAnger (-30 min)41.7 T-ScoreStandard Error 0.5
High ProteinMood-state QuestionnairesFatigue (-30 min)47.4 T-ScoreStandard Error 1.4
High ProteinMood-state QuestionnairesAnger (+60 min)40.8 T-ScoreStandard Error 0.3
High ProteinMood-state QuestionnairesTension (+60 min)42.2 T-ScoreStandard Error 0.4
High ProteinMood-state QuestionnairesDepression (-30 min)43.5 T-ScoreStandard Error 0.6
High ProteinMood-state QuestionnairesDepression (+60 min)55.1 T-ScoreStandard Error 12.5
High ProteinMood-state QuestionnairesFriendliness (+60 min)44.4 T-ScoreStandard Error 1.6
High ProteinMood-state QuestionnairesVigor (-30 min)45.6 T-ScoreStandard Error 1.8
High ProteinMood-state QuestionnairesFriendliness (-30 min)45.8 T-ScoreStandard Error 1.6
High ProteinMood-state QuestionnairesConfusion (-30 min)43.5 T-ScoreStandard Error 0.7
High ProteinMood-state QuestionnairesConfusion (+60 min)42.2 T-ScoreStandard Error 0.5
High ProteinMood-state QuestionnairesFatigue (+60 min)47.9 T-ScoreStandard Error 1.3
High ProteinMood-state QuestionnairesTension (-30 min42.8 T-ScoreStandard Error 0.5
High Fat (Low Protein)Mood-state QuestionnairesConfusion (-30 min)42.1 T-ScoreStandard Error 0.4
High Fat (Low Protein)Mood-state QuestionnairesVigor (-30 min)44.2 T-ScoreStandard Error 1.8
High Fat (Low Protein)Mood-state QuestionnairesAnger (-30 min)41.3 T-ScoreStandard Error 0.4
High Fat (Low Protein)Mood-state QuestionnairesVigor (+60 min)43.2 T-ScoreStandard Error 1.6
High Fat (Low Protein)Mood-state QuestionnairesFatigue (+60 min)47.2 T-ScoreStandard Error 1.2
High Fat (Low Protein)Mood-state QuestionnairesAnger (+60 min)40.5 T-ScoreStandard Error 0.2
High Fat (Low Protein)Mood-state QuestionnairesDepression (+60 min)42.5 T-ScoreStandard Error 0.2
High Fat (Low Protein)Mood-state QuestionnairesTension (-30 min42.4 T-ScoreStandard Error 0.4
High Fat (Low Protein)Mood-state QuestionnairesDepression (-30 min)42.8 T-ScoreStandard Error 0.5
High Fat (Low Protein)Mood-state QuestionnairesFriendliness (-30 min)45.3 T-ScoreStandard Error 1.6
High Fat (Low Protein)Mood-state QuestionnairesTension (+60 min)42.1 T-ScoreStandard Error 0.4
High Fat (Low Protein)Mood-state QuestionnairesFatigue (-30 min)48.2 T-ScoreStandard Error 1.3
High Fat (Low Protein)Mood-state QuestionnairesFriendliness (+60 min)44.0 T-ScoreStandard Error 1.7
High Fat (Low Protein)Mood-state QuestionnairesConfusion (+60 min)41.8 T-ScoreStandard Error 0.4
No SnackMood-state QuestionnairesFriendliness (+60 min)43.3 T-ScoreStandard Error 1.5
No SnackMood-state QuestionnairesConfusion (+60 min)42.4 T-ScoreStandard Error 0.5
No SnackMood-state QuestionnairesFatigue (-30 min)49.6 T-ScoreStandard Error 1.4
No SnackMood-state QuestionnairesFatigue (+60 min)50 T-ScoreStandard Error 1.2
No SnackMood-state QuestionnairesTension (-30 min43.2 T-ScoreStandard Error 0.7
No SnackMood-state QuestionnairesTension (+60 min)41.9 T-ScoreStandard Error 0.3
No SnackMood-state QuestionnairesDepression (-30 min)43.1 T-ScoreStandard Error 0.6
No SnackMood-state QuestionnairesConfusion (-30 min)42.3 T-ScoreStandard Error 0.6
No SnackMood-state QuestionnairesVigor (-30 min)45.0 T-ScoreStandard Error 1.2
No SnackMood-state QuestionnairesVigor (+60 min)42.3 T-ScoreStandard Error 1.5
No SnackMood-state QuestionnairesAnger (-30 min)41.5 T-ScoreStandard Error 0.5
No SnackMood-state QuestionnairesAnger (+60 min)41.5 T-ScoreStandard Error 0.6
No SnackMood-state QuestionnairesDepression (+60 min)43 T-ScoreStandard Error 0.5
No SnackMood-state QuestionnairesFriendliness (-30 min)46.8 T-ScoreStandard Error 1.4
Secondary

Snack Palatability and Perception Questionnaires

Computerized questionnaires, assessing snack palatability and perceptions of the snack will be completed during screening and after the first and last bite of each snack during the acclimation and testing days. The questionnaires contain visual analog scales incorporating a 100 mm horizontal line rating scale for each response. The questions are worded as how strong is your feeling of with anchors of not all (scores 0 out of 100) to extremely (scores 100 out of 100). The questions assess snack appearance, smell, flavor, texture (feel), liking. The Adaptive Visual Analog Scale Software (Neurobehavioral Research Laboratory and Clinic; San Antonio, TX) was used for these assessments.

Time frame: 5 min

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
High ProteinSnack Palatability and Perception Questionnaires69 millimetersStandard Error 4
High Fat (Low Protein)Snack Palatability and Perception Questionnaires80 millimetersStandard Error 3
No SnackSnack Palatability and Perception QuestionnairesNA millimeters

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 17, 2026