Breast Cancer
Conditions
Brief summary
The purpose of this study is to compare the effect of early individualized psychosocial assets versus a standard support on social inequalities in the rate of return to work
Detailed description
For the group "intervention", patients have four interviews with a psychologist (at cure one of chemotherapy treatment, at cure six of chemotherapy treatment, at last radiotherapy session, and three months after the end of radiotherapy). In the 2 arms, patients receive 4 sets of questionnaires (baseline, month 12, month 18 and month 24)
Interventions
BEHAVIORALinterviews with a psychologist
interviews with a psychologist
BEHAVIORALQuestionnaires
Questionnaires
Sponsors
Centre Oscar Lambret
University Hospital, Lille
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
* Women ≥ 18 with work at the time of diagnosis * Presenting a unilateral breast cancer exclusively local extension * Having received surgery * Reporting of adjuvant chemotherapy (+ / - trastuzumab) * Reporting to radiotherapy or not (If radiotherapy, it will be done on site investigator) * In work at the time of diagnosis (employees, traders and professionals) * Patient affiliated to a social security scheme * Consent signed by the patient before the implementation of any specific procedure to study
Exclusion criteria
* Presence of in situ lesions, cancer recurrence, metastatic disease immediately, location bilateral * Inability physical, psychological, psychiatric or cognitive responses to the questionnaires and participate in interviews * Recognition previous ALD (due to another disease) * Patient under guardianship
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Comparison of the effect of early individualized psychosocial assets versus a standard support on social inequalities in the rate of return to work | At 24 months |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Comparison between the two modes of care, of social inequalities: | At 24 months | * On the quality of the return to employment (working conditions, job stability) * On individual and collective resources of patients (social encouragement received, reactions to issues, anxiety/depression, quality of life, etc) |
| Calculating the cost / benefit ratio of the two modes of care | At 24 months | — |
Countries
France
Contacts
STUDY_DIRECTORSophie FANTONI, MD, PhD
CHRU / Université Lille 2
STUDY_DIRECTORJacques BONNETERRE, MD, PhD
Centre Oscar Lambret
Outcome results
None listed