Skip to content

Development of a PET-MR Myocardial Perfusion Examination Using Regadenoson

Development of a PET-MR Myocardial Perfusion Examination Using Regadenoson

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01779869
Acronym
PET/MR-P
Enrollment
16
Registered
2013-01-30
Start date
2013-01-31
Completion date
2015-06-30
Last updated
2018-06-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Ischemic Heart Disease

Keywords

PET MR myocardial perfusion imaging

Brief summary

The objective for this pilot study is to develop an optimized, clinically usable myocardial PET-MR perfusion protocol and to determine which of all data potentially available should be acquired for a clinical myocardial perfusion examination. Hypothesis: The hypothesis is that high resolution, high sensitivity DCE MRI could replace the rest PET myocardial perfusion imaging, significantly decreasing examination time and patient radiation dose while maintaining the comprehensive reference-quality PET myocardial stress perfusion coverage. The primary outcome will be comparison of diagnostic accuracy of each combination of imaging to detect clinically significant coronary artery stenosis (≥70% diameter stenosis).

Detailed description

Simultaneous acquisition PET-MRI is a new technology that has the potential to significantly impact diagnostic patient care. It combines high signal resolution MRI anatomic imaging and PET biological measurements, with the added benefit of radiation dose reduction in comparison to PET-CT. As the incidence of false positive SPECT-MPI studies secondary to attenuation artifact is relatively high and MRI coverage of the left ventricular myocardium is limited, it is likely that one of the immediate applications of PET-MRI technology is myocardial ischemia assessment. PET has long been considered the noninvasive reference standard for myocardial perfusion. However, delayed contrast enhanced (DCE) MRI is very sensitive for infarct detection. Indeed, both PET and MR imaging have the potential to provide comprehensive whole heart ischemia and infarct detection. PET-MR technology, with its ability to obtain simultaneous perfusion information via both PET and MRI, has the potential to obtain multiple, possibly redundant, data sets. On the other hand, it also has the potential to combine the best of both techniques to provide a highly robust examination that is both shorter and of lower radiation dose than the standard myocardial PET perfusion examination. Optimization of a protocol is necessary to develop a comprehensive protocol without redundancy. Because of its single injection capability, regadenoson is ideally suited to a protocol that will assess and employ dual-modality myocardial perfusion data collection. It is expected that the best candidates for PET-MR myocardial perfusion imaging will likely be a) patients whose body habitus suggests that their SPECT-MPI examination would be limited by attenuation artifact -- women with large breasts and patients (usually men) with abdominal obesity and/or b) patients who may have a smaller region of ischemia that might be missed on an MRI examinations with limited perfusion coverage.

Interventions

DRUGRegadenoson

Regadenoson 400 micrograms will be administered in a single IV bolus (\<10 seconds) via an antecubital cannula and followed by 5 mL of saline flush. 10-20 seconds after the regadenoson is administered, 10 mCi of 13N-ammonia as a bolus, and 0.075 mmol/Kg of gadobenate dimeglumine MR contrast agent at a rate of 5 mL/sec followed by a 15 mL normal saline flush will be administered simultaneous, each into an antecubital vein, and a 15 min list-mode PET acquisition will be acquired simultaneously with the MR perfusion imaging.

Sponsors

Astellas Pharma US, Inc.
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Washington University School of Medicine
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients who have had a clinically ordered rest/regadenoson single-isotope SPECT-MPI study within 10 days prior to cardiac PET-MRI examination * Reversible perfusion abnormalities on SPECT imaging in at least 2 contiguous myocardial segments * Patients for whom standard of care coronary ICA is planned

Exclusion criteria

* An clinical event (ie; worsening angina pectoris or myocardial infarction) occuring after the SPECT-MPI and before the cardiac MRI examination * Myocardial revascularization occuring after the SPECT-MPI and before the cardiac MRI examination * Contraindications to MR imaging (pacemaker, brain aneurysm clips, shrapnel, etc.) * Renal insufficiency (GFR \< 60 mL/min/1.73m2) * Allergy or other contraindication to gadolinium-based MR contrast agent * Second or third degree atrioventricular (AV) block * Active asthma * Seizures * Current hypotension (\<100/60) * Current hypertension (\>160/90) * Pregnancy * Breast feeding * Use of caffeine, nicotine or over the counter cold medicines within 12 hours of the cardiac PET-MRI examination * Use of the medication dipyridamole within 48 hrs of the cardiac PET-MRI examination

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Diagnostic Accuracy of Cardiac PET/MRI ExaminationPET/MRI imaging was performed within 10 days after SPECT-MPI examinationThe accuracy of the cardiac PET and cardiac MR examination components of the PET/MRI, and the accuracy of the combined PET/MR examination, for ischemic heart disease will be compared to the accuracy of cardiac SPECT in patients who have had ICA as truth or the reference standard. To assess the accuracy of an abbreviated PET/MR examination, an additional accuracy analysis was made using only the stress PET perfusion imaging and the MR LGE data sets. The accuracy of this combined data set was also determined with ICA as truth or the reference standard. Accuracy is calculated as % difference = (experimental - true) x 100%.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Single Group Assignment - Imaging
All patients will undergo PET-MR myocardial perfusion imaging during rapid intravenous administration of 0.4 mg regadenoson. Regadenoson: Regadenoson 400 micrograms will be administered in a single IV bolus (\<10 seconds) via an antecubital cannula and followed by 5 mL of saline flush. 10-20 seconds after the regadenoson is administered, 10 mCi of 13N-ammonia as a bolus, and 0.075 mmol/Kg of gadobenate dimeglumine MR contrast agent at a rate of 5 mL/sec followed by a 15 mL normal saline flush will be administered simultaneous, each into an antecubital vein, and a 15 min list-mode PET acquisition will be acquired simultaneously with the MR perfusion imaging.
16
Total16

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyPhysician Decision2

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicSingle Group Assignment - Imaging
Age, Continuous55 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.4
Positive cardiac SPECT stress test (2 contiguous segments)16 Participants
Scheduled to undergo ICA16 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
9 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
7 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 16
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 16
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 16

Outcome results

Primary

Diagnostic Accuracy of Cardiac PET/MRI Examination

The accuracy of the cardiac PET and cardiac MR examination components of the PET/MRI, and the accuracy of the combined PET/MR examination, for ischemic heart disease will be compared to the accuracy of cardiac SPECT in patients who have had ICA as truth or the reference standard. To assess the accuracy of an abbreviated PET/MR examination, an additional accuracy analysis was made using only the stress PET perfusion imaging and the MR LGE data sets. The accuracy of this combined data set was also determined with ICA as truth or the reference standard. Accuracy is calculated as % difference = (experimental - true) x 100%.

Time frame: PET/MRI imaging was performed within 10 days after SPECT-MPI examination

Population: Patients who completed the full PET-MR myocardial perfusion examination

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Single Group Assignment - ImagingDiagnostic Accuracy of Cardiac PET/MRI ExaminationSPECT Accuracy50 percentage
Single Group Assignment - ImagingDiagnostic Accuracy of Cardiac PET/MRI ExaminationMR Accuracy64 percentage
Single Group Assignment - ImagingDiagnostic Accuracy of Cardiac PET/MRI ExaminationPET Accuracy61 percentage
Single Group Assignment - ImagingDiagnostic Accuracy of Cardiac PET/MRI ExaminationCombined PET/MR Accuracy64 percentage
Single Group Assignment - ImagingDiagnostic Accuracy of Cardiac PET/MRI ExaminationAbbreviated PET/MR64 percentage
Comparison: Significance testing between the diagnostic accuracy of SPECT and PET, and SPECT and MR, and SPECT and PET/MR was performed by using chi square test. A P value \< 0.05 was considered significant.p-value: 0.35Chi-squared

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026