Skip to content

Efficacy and Safety Study of Botulinum Toxin Type A for Moderate to Severe Crow's Feet Lines

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01776606
Acronym
RADIANT
Enrollment
247
Registered
2013-01-28
Start date
2012-12-31
Completion date
2013-05-31
Last updated
2014-05-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Skin Aging

Brief summary

This study will evaluate the efficacy and safety of botulinum toxin type A compared to placebo control for the treatment of moderate to severe crow's feet lines.

Interventions

DRUGBotulinum Toxin Type A

Botulinum Toxin Type A, Dose A; dose applied to the lateral canthal lines

DRUGPlacebo

Placebo, Dose B; dose applied to the lateral canthal lines

Sponsors

Revance Therapeutics, Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Moderate to severe crow's feet lines * Female or male, 18 to 65 years of age and in good general health * Women of childbearing potential (WOCBP) must agree to use an effective method of birth control during the course of the study

Exclusion criteria

* Any neurological condition that may place the subject at increased risk with exposure to botulinum toxin type A * Muscle weakness or paralysis, particularly in the area receiving study treatment * Active skin disease or irritation at the treatment area * Deep dermal scarring, or inability to smooth out the crow's feet lines to be treated by manually spreading the skin apart * Treatment with botulinum toxin type A for crow's feet lines in the last 6 months

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Composite endpoint based upon the investigator global assessment and patient assessment of severity of lateral canthal linesWeek 4

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Proportion of subjects with 2 point or greater improvement from baseline using the Investigator Global AssessmentWeek 4
Proportion of subjects with 1 point or greater improvement from baseline using the Investigator Global AssessmentWeek 4
Proportion of subjects with a 2 point or greater improvement from baseline using the Patient Severity AssessmentWeek 4

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026