Physical Activity, Sedentary Lifestyle
Conditions
Keywords
physical activity, sedentary behavior, accelerometer, GPS, GIS, machine learning
Brief summary
The majority of the US population spends most of the day sitting and the we have new scientific evidence that this can contribute to poor health regardless of how much physical activity a person does. However, we do not measure sitting time very accurately and when we ask people to tell us how much they do, their answers are unreliable. Our study will use small sensors to objectively measure when people sit or do physical activity, and we will use sophisticated computational techniques to summarize these movement patterns.
Interventions
OTHERMeasurement
Measured usual (day-to-day) behavior with body-worn sensors.
Sponsors
University of California, San Diego
Study design
Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
BASIC_SCIENCE
Masking
NONE
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
6 Years to 85 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes
Inclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria for participants 6-17 yr olds: * provide written parental consent to complete study protocols; * provide verbal assent to complete study protocols; * willingness to complete 2 visits to UCSD offices; * willingness to wear multiple sensor devices on 7 days for 12 hours per day; * willingness to wear wrist accelerometer on 7 days for 24 hours per day; * willingness to have their height and weight measured; * be able to walk unassisted * able to read and understand study materials in English. Inclusion Criteria for participants 18-64 yr old: * provide written consent to complete study protocols; * willingness to complete 2 visits to UCSD offices; * willingness to wear multiple sensor devices on 7 days for 12 hours per day; * willingness to wear wrist accelerometer on 7 days for 24 hours per day; * complete a survey assessing their demographic characteristics; * willingness to have their height and weight measured; * be physically and cognitively able to walk unassisted, * able to read and understand study materials in English. Inclusion Criteria for participants 65-85 yr olds: * provide written consent to complete study protocols; * correctly answer verbal questions about their comprehension of the informed consent; * willingness to complete 2 visits to UCSD offices; * willingness to wear multiple sensor devices on 7 days for 12 hours per day; * willingness to wear wrist accelerometer on 7 days for 24 hours per day; * complete a survey assessing their demographic; * willingness to have their height and weight measured; * be physically and cognitively able to walk without the assistance of another person (walking aids are permitted) * able to read and understand study materials in English.
Exclusion criteria
* unable to ambulate; * attends a workplace or school on monitoring days that prohibits static images being taken by a SenseCam worn around the neck of the participant; * pregnancy in second or third trimester.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| physical activity behavior classification using study sensors (accelerometers, Sensecam and GPS) | Baseline | Using an annotated data set of SenseCam images in three free-living population subgroups, we will compare sensitivity, specificity and percent agreement between behavioral classifiers derived from: (a) single axis vs. multi axis accelerometers; (b) aggregated movement counts vs. raw acceleration data; (c) hip vs. wrist mounted accelerometers. Determine (a) the extent to which adding GPS data improves discrimination accuracy over accelerometer only behavior classification (i.e., best classifier resulting from Aim 1); and (b) the extent to which adding GIS data improves discrimination accuracy over accelerometer and GPS behavior classification alone (i.e., best classifier resulting from Aim 2a). |
Countries
United States
Outcome results
None listed