Non-small Cell Lung Cancer With EGFR-Activating Mutations
Conditions
Keywords
first-line, locally advanced or metastatic, non-small cell lung cancer, epidermal growth factor receptor, EGFR, ARCHER, mutation, dacomitinib, PF-00299804
Brief summary
This is a multinational, multicenter, randomized, open-label, Phase 3 study comparing the efficacy and safety of treatment with dacomitinib (PF-00299804) to treatment with gefitinib in patients with locally advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer, with epidermal growth factor receptor EGFR-activating mutation (s). Analyses of primary objective (Progression Free Survival) will be done as defined in the protocol.
Detailed description
452 patients were randomized in a 1:1 ratio between dacomitinib (PF-00299804 ) vs. gefitinib.
Interventions
Dacomitinib (PF-00299804) 45 mg tablets, continuous oral daily dosing.
Gefitinib 250 mg tablets, continuous oral daily dosing.
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Evidence of histo or cytopathology confirmed, advanced NSCLC (with known histology) with the presence of EGFR-activating mutation (exon 19 deletion or the L858R mutation in exon 21). * It is acceptable for subjects with the presence of the exon 20 T790M mutation together with either EGFR-activating mutation (exon 19 deletion or the L858R mutation in exon 21) to be included in this study * No prior treatment with systemic therapy for locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC. Minimum of 12 months disease free interval between completion of neoadjuvant/adjuvant systemic therapy and recurrence of NSCLC * Adequate tissue sample must be available for central analyses. * Adequate renal, hematologic, liver function. * ECOG PS of 0-1. * Radiologically measurable disease.
Exclusion criteria
* Any evidence of mixed histology that includes elements of small cell or carcinoid lung cancer. * Any other mutation other than exon 19 deletion or L858R in exon 21, with or without the presence of the exon 20 T790M mutation. * Any history of brain metastases or leptomeningeal metastases. * Any previous anti-cancer systemic treatment of early, locally advanced, or metastatic NSCLC. * Any surgery(not including minor procedures such as lymph node biopsy), palliative radiotherapy or pleurodesis within 2 weeks of baseline assessments * Any clinically significant gastrointestinal abnormalities that may impair intake, transit or absorption of the study drug. * Current enrollment in another therapeutic clinical study. * History of, or currently suspected, diffuse non-infectious pneumonitis or interstitial lung disease * Uncontrolled medical disorders. * Prior malignancy and concurrent malignancy except for non melanoma skin cancer or in-situ cervical cancer with no evidence of active disease. * Use of narrow therapeutic index drugs that are CYP2D6 substrates from screening to randomization.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Progression Free Survival (PFS) Based on Independent Radiologic Central (IRC) Review | Day 28 of Cycle 1, Cycle 2 then every 8 weeks until disease progression or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first (up to 48 months) | PFS: time from randomization to date of progression of disease (PD) as determined by IRC review as per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) v1.1 criteria or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. PD: \>=20% increase in sum of diameters of target lesions (TLs), referring smallest sum on study, sum must be an absolute increase of \>=5 mm, appearance of \>=1 new lesions; unequivocal progression of existing non TLs. Overall tumor burden increased sufficiently to merit discontinuation of therapy. In presence of stable disease (did not achieve partial response, complete response or PD) or partial response (\>=30% decrease under baseline of sum of diameters of all target measurable lesions, short diameter used in the sum for target nodes, longest diameter used in sum for all other target lesions) in target disease; for new lesions: appearance of any new unequivocal malignant lesion indicated PD. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| OS at 30 Months (OS30m) | Up to 30 months from date of randomization | OS30m was defined as the probability of a participant being alive at 30 months from date of randomization. |
| Progression Free Survival (PFS) Based on Investigator Assessment | Day 28 of Cycle 1, Cycle 2 then every 8 weeks until disease progression or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first (up to 48 months) | PFS: time from randomization to date of PD as determined by investigator assessment as per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) v1.1 criteria or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. PD for target lesions: 20% increase in sum of diameters of target measurable lesions above smallest sum observed, with minimum absolute increase of 5 mm; for non-target lesions: unequivocal progression of pre-existing lesions. Overall tumor burden increased sufficiently to merit discontinuation of therapy. In presence of stable disease (did not achieve partial response, complete response or PD) or partial response (\>=30% decrease under baseline of sum of diameters of all target measurable lesions, short diameter used in the sum for target nodes, longest diameter used in sum for all other target lesions) in target disease; for new lesions: appearance of any new unequivocal malignant lesion indicated PD. |
| Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) Based on IRC Review | Day 28 of Cycle 1, Cycle 2 then every 8 weeks until disease progression (up to 48 months) | BOR for CR/PR:\>=1 objective status (OBS) of CR/PR documented before PD; SD:\>=1 OBS of stable documented \>=8 weeks (wks) post treatment & before PD, not qualifying as CR/PR; PD:OBS of PD within 12 wks treatment, not qualifying as CR/PR/SD; indeterminate:PD not documented within 12 wks post treatment & no other response category applies. RECIST v1.1, CR:disappearance of all target lesions (TLs), non TLs;any pathological lymph nodes (LN) must reduce in short axis to \<10 mm; normalization of tumour marker level, for non TL all LN must be non-pathological in size (\<10 mm short axis); PR:\>=30% decrease in sum of diameters of TLs, referring baseline sum diameters. SD:neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD, referring smallest sum diameters on study. PD:\>=20% increase in sum of diameters of TLs, referring smallest sum on study, sum must be an absolute increase of \>=5 mm, appearance of \>=1 new lesions;unequivocal progression of existing non TLs. |
| Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) Based on Investigator Assessment | Day 28 of Cycle 1, Cycle 2 then every 8 weeks until disease progression (up to 48 months) | BOR for CR/PR:\>=1 objective status (OBS) of CR/PR documented before PD; SD:\>=1 OBS of stable documented \>=8 weeks (wks) post treatment & before PD, not qualifying as CR/PR; PD:OBS of PD within 12 wks treatment, not qualifying as CR/PR/SD; indeterminate:PD not documented within 12 wks post treatment & no other response category applies. RECIST v1.1, CR:disappearance of all target lesions (TLs), non TLs;any pathological lymph nodes (LN) must reduce in short axis to \<10 mm; normalization of tumour marker level, for non TL all LN must be non-pathological in size (\<10 mm short axis); PR:\>=30% decrease in sum of diameters of TLs, referring baseline sum diameters. SD:neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD, referring smallest sum diameters on study. PD:\>=20% increase in sum of diameters of TLs, referring smallest sum on study, sum must be an absolute increase of \>=5 mm, appearance of \>=1 new lesions;unequivocal progression of existing non TLs. |
| Duration of Response (DoR) | Day 28 of Cycle 1, Cycle 2 then every 8 weeks until disease progression or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first (up to 48 months) | DoR was defined as time from first documentation of objective response(CR or PR, whichever occurred first)to date of PD/death from any cause, whichever occurred first. CR: disappearance of all target lesions (TLs), non TLs; any pathological lymph nodes (LN) must reduce in short axis to \<10 mm; normalization of tumour marker level, for non TL all LN must be non-pathological in size (\<10 mm short axis); PR:\>=30% decrease in sum of diameters of TLs, referring baseline sum diameters. PD:\>=20% increase in sum of diameters of TLs, referring smallest sum on study, sum must be an absolute increase of \>=5 mm, appearance of \>=1 new lesions; unequivocal progression of existing non TLs. DoR was recorded based on IRC review and investigator's assessment and summarized for subgroup of participants with objective disease response. |
| Objective Response Rate (ORR) Based on IRC Review | Day 28 of Cycle 1, Cycle 2 then every 8 weeks until disease progression (up to 48 months) | Percentage of participants with a BOR of either CR or PR based on IRC review recorded from the start of treatment until disease progression based on RECIST v1.1. CR: disappearance of all target lesions (TLs), non TLs; any pathological lymph nodes (LN) must reduce in short axis to \<10 mm; normalization of tumour marker level, for non TL all LN must be non-pathological in size (\<10 mm short axis); PR:\>=30% decrease in sum of diameters of TLs, referring baseline sum diameters. PD:\>=20% increase in sum of diameters of TLs, referring smallest sum on study, sum must be an absolute increase of \>=5 mm, appearance of \>=1 new lesions; unequivocal progression of existing non TLs. |
| Objective Response Rate (ORR) Based on Investigator Assessment | Day 28 of Cycle 1, Cycle 2 then every 8 weeks until disease progression (up to 48 months) | Percentage of participants with a BOR of either CR or PR based on investigator assessment recorded from the start of treatment until disease progression based on RECIST v1.1. CR: disappearance of all target lesions (TLs), non TLs; any pathological lymph nodes (LN) must reduce in short axis to \<10 mm; normalization of tumour marker level, for non TL all LN must be non-pathological in size (\<10 mm short axis); PR:\>=30% decrease in sum of diameters of TLs, referring baseline sum diameters. PD:\>=20% increase in sum of diameters of TLs, referring smallest sum on study, sum must be an absolute increase of \>=5 mm, appearance of \>=1 new lesions; unequivocal progression of existing non TLs. |
| Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) | From randomization until death or last date known as alive, up to 91 months | An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship.AEs included both serious and non- serious adverse events. An SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. Treatment-emergent AEs were events between first dose of study drug and up to 28-35 days after last dose that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pretreatment state. |
| Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities of Grade 3 or Higher Severity Based on NCI CTCAE Version 4.03: Biochemistry and Haematology | From randomization until death or last date known as alive, up to 61 months | Parameters included anaemia, activated partial thromboplastin time, haemoglobin, international normalized ratio, lymphocyte count, lymphopenia, neutrophils (absolute), platelets, prothrombin time and white blood cells. Biochemistry parameters included alanine aminotransferase (increased), alkaline phosphatase (increased), aspartate aminotransferase (increased), bilirubin (total), creatinine (increased), hypercalcaemia, hyperglycaemia, hyperkalaemia, hypermagnesaemia, hypernatraemia, hypoalbuminaemia, hypocalcaemia, hypoglycaemia, hypokalaemia, hypomagnesaemia, hyponatraemia. Test abnormalities were graded by AEs according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events(NCI CTCAE) version 4.03 as Grade 1=mild; Grade 2=moderate; Grade 3=severe; Grade 4=life-threatening; Grade 5=death related to AE. Only categories with at least 1 participant with abnormality are reported in this outcome measure. |
| Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities: Urinalysis | From randomization until death or last date known as alive, up to 61 months | Urinalysis parameter included urine protein, urine blood/haemoglobin, urine glucose and urine sediment. Test abnormalities was defined as deviation from normal range (higher or lower). Normal range of 24-hour urine protein test: less than 150 mg of protein per day, urine glucose: 0 to 0.8 mmol/L (millimole per liter), urine protein: 0 to 20 mg/dL (milligrams per deciliter). Urine blood/haemoglobin abnormality was defined as presence and absence of blood/haemoglobin in urine of participants. Urine sediment abnormality was defined as the presence of any bacteria, casts, crystals, and epithelial cells. Only categories with at least 1 participant with abnormality are reported in this outcome measure. |
| Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Vital Signs | From randomization until death or last date known as alive, up to 61 months | Criteria for vital signs abnormalities: postbaseline pulse rate less than (\<) 50 beats per minute (bpm) or greater than (\>)130 bpm and maximum increase from baseline in pulse rate \>=30 bpm and maximum decrease from baseline in pulse rate \<=30 bpm. Systolic blood pressure (BP) of maximum increase from baseline (MIB) \>=40 millimeters of mercury (mmHg), maximum decrease from baseline (MDB) in systolic blood pressure =\<60 mmHg. Diastolic blood pressure of MIB \>=20 mmHg and MDB in diastolic blood pressure \>-40 and =\<-20 mm Hg. And MDB in diastolic BP\<=-40 mmHg. Only categories with at least 1 participant with abnormality are reported in this outcome measure. |
| Overall Survival (OS) | From randomization until death or last date known as alive, up to 45 months | OS was defined as the time from randomization to the date of death for any cause. In the absence of confirmation of death, survival time was censored at the last date the participant was known to be alive. OS (month)=\[death date or last known alive date - randomization date + 1\]/30.4375. |
| Number of Participants With Maximum Relative Decrease From Baseline >20% in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) | From baseline up to 7 days of Cycle 4 (up to 91 days) | An ejection fraction (EF) was the volumetric fraction of blood ejected from a ventricle of the heart with each heartbeat; it was a measure of the pumping efficiency of the heart. The EF of the left heart, known as the left ventricular ejection fraction, was a measure of the efficiency of pumping into the body's systemic circulation. |
| Health Related Quality of Life (HRQOL): Time to Deterioration (TTD) in Pain, Dyspnea, Fatigue or Cough | Baseline until the end of treatment (up to 48 months) | HRQOL was measured by standardized questionnaires (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC)) quality of life questionnaires (OLQ-C30) and its lung cancer module (QLQ-LC13). TTD in pain (chest, arm/shoulder), dyspnea, fatigue or cough was defined as time between baseline and first occurrence of increase in score of 10 points or greater from baseline in any of these 4 symptoms for at least two consecutive cycles. For those who had not shown deterioration, the data was censored at the last date when the participants completed an assessment for pain, dyspnea, fatigue or cough. |
| Overall Mean Scores of Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension Visual Analog Scale (EQ-5D VAS) | From Cycle 1 Day 1 up to 48 months | The Euro Quality of Life-5 dimension (EQ-5D) is a brief self-administered, validated reliable generic health status instrument. EQ-5D general health status can also be measured by a visual analog scale (EQ-5D VAS). EQ-5D VAS measures the participant's self-rated health status on a scale from 0 (worst imaginable health state) to 100 (best imaginable health state). |
| Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Dacomitinib and Its Metabolite PF-05199265 | Pre-dose and 2, 4, 6, 8, and 24 hours post-dose on Cycle 2 Day 1 (Day 29) | Cmax was defined as maximum observed plasma concentration and can be observed directly from data. |
| Time to Reach Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of Dacomitinib and Its Metabolite PF-05199265 | Pre-dose and 2, 4, 6, 8, and 24 hours post-dose (sample collection time points had window of +/- 10% of nominal time) on Cycle 2 Day 1 (Day 29) | Tmax was defined as time to first occurrence of Cmax and can be observed directly from data as time of first occurrence. |
| Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve From Time Zero (0) to End of Dosing Interval (AUCtau) of Dacomitinib and Its Metabolite PF-05199265 | Pre-dose and 2, 4, 6, 8, and 24 hours post-dose on Cycle 2 Day 1 (Day 29) | AUCtau was defined as area under the plasma concentration-time curve over dosing interval tau and was determined by Linear/Log trapezoidal method. |
| Averaged Plasma Concentration at Steady State (Cavg) of Dacomitinib and Its Metabolite PF-05199265 | Pre-dose and 2, 4, 6, 8, and 24 hours post-dose on Cycle 2 Day 1 (Day 29) | Cavg was defined as averaged plasma concentration at steady state, and was calculated as AUCtau/tau. |
| Minimum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmin) of Dacomitinib and Its Metabolite PF-05199265 | Pre-dose and 2, 4, 6, 8, and 24 hours post-dose on Cycle 2 Day 1 (Day 29) | Cmin was defined as minimum observed plasma concentration and can be observed directly from data. |
| Fluctuation Coefficient Between Trough and Peak Plasma Concentration (DF) of Dacomitinib and Its Metabolite PF-05199265 | Pre-dose and 2, 4, 6, 8, and 24 hours post-dose on Cycle 2 Day 1 (Day 29) | Fluctuation coefficient between trough and peak plasma concentration was determined as Cmax-Ctrough divided by Cavg, where Cmax was the maximum observed concentration within the dosing interval, Ctrough was the observed concentration prior to dose administration and Cavg was averaged plasma concentration at steady state. |
| Apparent Clearance (CL) of Dacomitinib | Pre-dose and 2, 4, 6, 8, and 24 hours post-dose on Cycle 2 Day 1 (Day 29) | Drug clearance was a quantitative measure of the rate at which a drug substance was removed from the blood (rate at which a drug is metabolized or eliminated by normal biological processes). |
| Pre-dose Plasma Concentrations (Ctrough) of Dacomitinib and Its Metabolite PF-05199265 | Pre-dose on Day 1 of Cycle 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 | Trough plasma concentration was defined as the measured concentration at the end of a dosing interval at steady state (taken directly before next administration). |
| Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormality in Electrocardiogram (ECG) | From randomization until death or last date known as alive, up to 61 months | ECG parameters included corrected QT interval using Bazett's formula (QTcB) and corrected QT interval using Fridericia's formula (QTcF). ECG criteria for abnormality: absolute value 450 - \<480 msec, 480 - \<500 msec, \>=500msec. The number of participants with potentially clinically significant ECG findings at any visit were reported. |
Countries
China, Hong Kong, Italy, Japan, Poland, South Korea, Spain
Participant flow
Pre-assignment details
The study completed enrollment on 25 Mar 2015 with 452 participants randomized, 227 participants to the dacomitinib arm and 225 participants to the gefitinib arm. After the last data cutoff (DCO) date of 13 May 2019, 11 participants remained in the study to continue dacomitinib treatment. All 11 participants were discontinued from the study by last participant last visit (LPLV) on 27 Jan 2022.
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Dacomitinib Participants received 45 mg of dacomitinib tablets orally once daily in each treatment cycle of 28 days, up to a maximum of 48 months until disease progression, intolerable toxicities, withdrawal, death, or investigator decision dictated by protocol compliance, whichever occurred first. | 227 |
| Gefitinib Participants received 250 mg of gefitinib tablets orally once daily in each treatment cycle of 28 days, for maximum of 48 months until disease progression, intolerable toxicities, withdrawal, death, or investigator decision dictated by protocol compliance, whichever occurred first. | 225 |
| Total | 452 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 | FG001 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study | Death | 133 | 152 |
| Overall Study | Did not meet eligibility criteria | 0 | 3 |
| Overall Study | Disease progression | 5 | 0 |
| Overall Study | Lost to Follow-up | 6 | 7 |
| Overall Study | Other reasons and patients who completed the 48-month follow-up period | 58 | 49 |
| Overall Study | Study terminated by sponsor | 5 | 0 |
| Overall Study | Withdrawal by Subject | 20 | 14 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Gefitinib | Total | Dacomitinib |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 60.9 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.17 | 61.1 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.72 | 61.2 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.26 |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Hispanic or Latino | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Not Hispanic or Latino | 225 Participants | 452 Participants | 227 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) American Indian or Alaska Native | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Asian | 176 Participants | 346 Participants | 170 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Black or African American | 0 Participants | 1 Participants | 1 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) More than one race | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) White | 49 Participants | 105 Participants | 56 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 125 Participants | 271 Participants | 146 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 100 Participants | 181 Participants | 81 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk | EG002 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 133 / 227 | 152 / 224 | 1 / 11 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 224 / 227 | 217 / 224 | 11 / 11 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 69 / 227 | 53 / 224 | 4 / 11 |
Outcome results
Progression Free Survival (PFS) Based on Independent Radiologic Central (IRC) Review
PFS: time from randomization to date of progression of disease (PD) as determined by IRC review as per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) v1.1 criteria or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. PD: \>=20% increase in sum of diameters of target lesions (TLs), referring smallest sum on study, sum must be an absolute increase of \>=5 mm, appearance of \>=1 new lesions; unequivocal progression of existing non TLs. Overall tumor burden increased sufficiently to merit discontinuation of therapy. In presence of stable disease (did not achieve partial response, complete response or PD) or partial response (\>=30% decrease under baseline of sum of diameters of all target measurable lesions, short diameter used in the sum for target nodes, longest diameter used in sum for all other target lesions) in target disease; for new lesions: appearance of any new unequivocal malignant lesion indicated PD.
Time frame: Day 28 of Cycle 1, Cycle 2 then every 8 weeks until disease progression or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first (up to 48 months)
Population: Intent to treat (ITT) Population included all randomized participants, with study treatment assignment designated according to initial randomization, regardless of whether participants received study treatment or a different treatment from that to which they were randomized.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Dacomitinib | Progression Free Survival (PFS) Based on Independent Radiologic Central (IRC) Review | 14.7 months |
| Gefitinib | Progression Free Survival (PFS) Based on Independent Radiologic Central (IRC) Review | 9.2 months |
Apparent Clearance (CL) of Dacomitinib
Drug clearance was a quantitative measure of the rate at which a drug substance was removed from the blood (rate at which a drug is metabolized or eliminated by normal biological processes).
Time frame: Pre-dose and 2, 4, 6, 8, and 24 hours post-dose on Cycle 2 Day 1 (Day 29)
Population: PK analysis set included all participants who were treated with dacomitinib with at least 1 measured plasma concentration and were dose-compliant (who received 45 mg dacomitinib daily without interruptions/dose reductions for at least 14 days prior to day of data collection). This outcome measure was planned to be analyzed in Chinese subgroup only.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dacomitinib | Apparent Clearance (CL) of Dacomitinib | 27.61 Liter/hour | Standard Deviation 5.97 |
Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve From Time Zero (0) to End of Dosing Interval (AUCtau) of Dacomitinib and Its Metabolite PF-05199265
AUCtau was defined as area under the plasma concentration-time curve over dosing interval tau and was determined by Linear/Log trapezoidal method.
Time frame: Pre-dose and 2, 4, 6, 8, and 24 hours post-dose on Cycle 2 Day 1 (Day 29)
Population: PK analysis set included all participants who were treated with dacomitinib with at least 1 measured plasma concentration and were dose-compliant (who received 45 mg dacomitinib daily without interruptions/dose reductions for at least 14 days prior to day of data collection). This outcome measure was planned to be analyzed in Chinese subgroup only.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dacomitinib | Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve From Time Zero (0) to End of Dosing Interval (AUCtau) of Dacomitinib and Its Metabolite PF-05199265 | Dacomitinib | 1712.08 nanogram*hour/milliliter (ng*hr/mL) | Standard Deviation 413.61 |
| Dacomitinib | Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve From Time Zero (0) to End of Dosing Interval (AUCtau) of Dacomitinib and Its Metabolite PF-05199265 | PF-05199265 | 278.47 nanogram*hour/milliliter (ng*hr/mL) | Standard Deviation 163.53 |
Averaged Plasma Concentration at Steady State (Cavg) of Dacomitinib and Its Metabolite PF-05199265
Cavg was defined as averaged plasma concentration at steady state, and was calculated as AUCtau/tau.
Time frame: Pre-dose and 2, 4, 6, 8, and 24 hours post-dose on Cycle 2 Day 1 (Day 29)
Population: PK analysis set included all participants who were treated with dacomitinib with at least 1 measured plasma concentration and were dose-compliant (who received 45 mg dacomitinib daily without interruptions/dose reductions for at least 14 days prior to day of data collection). This outcome measure was planned to be analyzed in Chinese subgroup only.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dacomitinib | Averaged Plasma Concentration at Steady State (Cavg) of Dacomitinib and Its Metabolite PF-05199265 | Dacomitinib | 71.33 ng/mL | Standard Deviation 17.23 |
| Dacomitinib | Averaged Plasma Concentration at Steady State (Cavg) of Dacomitinib and Its Metabolite PF-05199265 | PF-05199265 | 11.60 ng/mL | Standard Deviation 6.81 |
Duration of Response (DoR)
DoR was defined as time from first documentation of objective response(CR or PR, whichever occurred first)to date of PD/death from any cause, whichever occurred first. CR: disappearance of all target lesions (TLs), non TLs; any pathological lymph nodes (LN) must reduce in short axis to \<10 mm; normalization of tumour marker level, for non TL all LN must be non-pathological in size (\<10 mm short axis); PR:\>=30% decrease in sum of diameters of TLs, referring baseline sum diameters. PD:\>=20% increase in sum of diameters of TLs, referring smallest sum on study, sum must be an absolute increase of \>=5 mm, appearance of \>=1 new lesions; unequivocal progression of existing non TLs. DoR was recorded based on IRC review and investigator's assessment and summarized for subgroup of participants with objective disease response.
Time frame: Day 28 of Cycle 1, Cycle 2 then every 8 weeks until disease progression or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first (up to 48 months)
Population: ITT Population included all randomized participants, with study treatment assignment designated according to initial randomization, regardless of whether participants received study treatment or a different treatment from that to which they were randomized.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dacomitinib | Duration of Response (DoR) | DoR: IRC review | 14.8 months |
| Dacomitinib | Duration of Response (DoR) | DoR: Investigator assessment | 15.9 months |
| Gefitinib | Duration of Response (DoR) | DoR: Investigator assessment | 9.2 months |
| Gefitinib | Duration of Response (DoR) | DoR: IRC review | 8.3 months |
Fluctuation Coefficient Between Trough and Peak Plasma Concentration (DF) of Dacomitinib and Its Metabolite PF-05199265
Fluctuation coefficient between trough and peak plasma concentration was determined as Cmax-Ctrough divided by Cavg, where Cmax was the maximum observed concentration within the dosing interval, Ctrough was the observed concentration prior to dose administration and Cavg was averaged plasma concentration at steady state.
Time frame: Pre-dose and 2, 4, 6, 8, and 24 hours post-dose on Cycle 2 Day 1 (Day 29)
Population: PK analysis set included all participants who were treated with dacomitinib with at least 1 measured plasma concentration and were dose-compliant (who received 45 mg dacomitinib daily without interruptions/dose reductions for at least 14 days prior to day of data collection). This outcome measure was planned to be analyzed in Chinese subgroup only.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dacomitinib | Fluctuation Coefficient Between Trough and Peak Plasma Concentration (DF) of Dacomitinib and Its Metabolite PF-05199265 | Dacomitinib | 0.2883 Fluctuation coefficient | Standard Deviation 0.146 |
| Dacomitinib | Fluctuation Coefficient Between Trough and Peak Plasma Concentration (DF) of Dacomitinib and Its Metabolite PF-05199265 | PF-05199265 | 0.1105 Fluctuation coefficient | Standard Deviation 0.0827 |
Health Related Quality of Life (HRQOL): Time to Deterioration (TTD) in Pain, Dyspnea, Fatigue or Cough
HRQOL was measured by standardized questionnaires (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC)) quality of life questionnaires (OLQ-C30) and its lung cancer module (QLQ-LC13). TTD in pain (chest, arm/shoulder), dyspnea, fatigue or cough was defined as time between baseline and first occurrence of increase in score of 10 points or greater from baseline in any of these 4 symptoms for at least two consecutive cycles. For those who had not shown deterioration, the data was censored at the last date when the participants completed an assessment for pain, dyspnea, fatigue or cough.
Time frame: Baseline until the end of treatment (up to 48 months)
Population: Patient reported outcomes (PRO) analysis set included all enrolled participants, who started treatment and completed a baseline PRO assessments and at least one post-baseline PRO assessment after the first dose.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Dacomitinib | Health Related Quality of Life (HRQOL): Time to Deterioration (TTD) in Pain, Dyspnea, Fatigue or Cough | 3.8 months |
| Gefitinib | Health Related Quality of Life (HRQOL): Time to Deterioration (TTD) in Pain, Dyspnea, Fatigue or Cough | 6.6 months |
Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Dacomitinib and Its Metabolite PF-05199265
Cmax was defined as maximum observed plasma concentration and can be observed directly from data.
Time frame: Pre-dose and 2, 4, 6, 8, and 24 hours post-dose on Cycle 2 Day 1 (Day 29)
Population: Pharmacokinetic (PK) analysis set included all participants who were treated with dacomitinib with at least 1 measured plasma concentration and were dose-compliant (who received 45 mg dacomitinib daily without interruptions/dose reductions for at least 14 days prior to day of data collection). This outcome measure was planned to be analyzed in Chinese subgroup only.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dacomitinib | Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Dacomitinib and Its Metabolite PF-05199265 | Dacomitinib | 84.19 nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL) | Standard Deviation 21.9 |
| Dacomitinib | Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Dacomitinib and Its Metabolite PF-05199265 | PF-05199265 | 12.77 nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL) | Standard Deviation 7.58 |
Minimum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmin) of Dacomitinib and Its Metabolite PF-05199265
Cmin was defined as minimum observed plasma concentration and can be observed directly from data.
Time frame: Pre-dose and 2, 4, 6, 8, and 24 hours post-dose on Cycle 2 Day 1 (Day 29)
Population: PK analysis set included all participants who were treated with dacomitinib with at least 1 measured plasma concentration and were dose-compliant (who received 45 mg dacomitinib daily without interruptions/dose reductions for at least 14 days prior to day of data collection). This outcome measure was planned to be analyzed in Chinese subgroup only.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dacomitinib | Minimum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmin) of Dacomitinib and Its Metabolite PF-05199265 | Dacomitinib | 60.64 ng/mL | Standard Deviation 14.85 |
| Dacomitinib | Minimum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmin) of Dacomitinib and Its Metabolite PF-05199265 | PF-05199265 | 10.49 ng/mL | Standard Deviation 6.26 |
Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) Based on Investigator Assessment
BOR for CR/PR:\>=1 objective status (OBS) of CR/PR documented before PD; SD:\>=1 OBS of stable documented \>=8 weeks (wks) post treatment & before PD, not qualifying as CR/PR; PD:OBS of PD within 12 wks treatment, not qualifying as CR/PR/SD; indeterminate:PD not documented within 12 wks post treatment & no other response category applies. RECIST v1.1, CR:disappearance of all target lesions (TLs), non TLs;any pathological lymph nodes (LN) must reduce in short axis to \<10 mm; normalization of tumour marker level, for non TL all LN must be non-pathological in size (\<10 mm short axis); PR:\>=30% decrease in sum of diameters of TLs, referring baseline sum diameters. SD:neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD, referring smallest sum diameters on study. PD:\>=20% increase in sum of diameters of TLs, referring smallest sum on study, sum must be an absolute increase of \>=5 mm, appearance of \>=1 new lesions;unequivocal progression of existing non TLs.
Time frame: Day 28 of Cycle 1, Cycle 2 then every 8 weeks until disease progression (up to 48 months)
Population: ITT Population included all randomized participants, with study treatment assignment designated according to initial randomization, regardless of whether participants received study treatment or a different treatment from that to which they were randomized.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dacomitinib | Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) Based on Investigator Assessment | Partial response | 169 Participants |
| Dacomitinib | Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) Based on Investigator Assessment | Progressive disease | 9 Participants |
| Dacomitinib | Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) Based on Investigator Assessment | Stable disease | 38 Participants |
| Dacomitinib | Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) Based on Investigator Assessment | Indeterminate | 9 Participants |
| Dacomitinib | Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) Based on Investigator Assessment | Complete response | 2 Participants |
| Gefitinib | Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) Based on Investigator Assessment | Indeterminate | 7 Participants |
| Gefitinib | Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) Based on Investigator Assessment | Complete response | 1 Participants |
| Gefitinib | Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) Based on Investigator Assessment | Partial response | 157 Participants |
| Gefitinib | Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) Based on Investigator Assessment | Stable disease | 49 Participants |
| Gefitinib | Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) Based on Investigator Assessment | Progressive disease | 11 Participants |
Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) Based on IRC Review
BOR for CR/PR:\>=1 objective status (OBS) of CR/PR documented before PD; SD:\>=1 OBS of stable documented \>=8 weeks (wks) post treatment & before PD, not qualifying as CR/PR; PD:OBS of PD within 12 wks treatment, not qualifying as CR/PR/SD; indeterminate:PD not documented within 12 wks post treatment & no other response category applies. RECIST v1.1, CR:disappearance of all target lesions (TLs), non TLs;any pathological lymph nodes (LN) must reduce in short axis to \<10 mm; normalization of tumour marker level, for non TL all LN must be non-pathological in size (\<10 mm short axis); PR:\>=30% decrease in sum of diameters of TLs, referring baseline sum diameters. SD:neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD, referring smallest sum diameters on study. PD:\>=20% increase in sum of diameters of TLs, referring smallest sum on study, sum must be an absolute increase of \>=5 mm, appearance of \>=1 new lesions;unequivocal progression of existing non TLs.
Time frame: Day 28 of Cycle 1, Cycle 2 then every 8 weeks until disease progression (up to 48 months)
Population: ITT Population included all randomized participants, with study treatment assignment designated according to initial randomization, regardless of whether participants received study treatment or a different treatment from that to which they were randomized.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dacomitinib | Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) Based on IRC Review | Complete response | 12 Participants |
| Dacomitinib | Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) Based on IRC Review | Progressive disease | 12 Participants |
| Dacomitinib | Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) Based on IRC Review | Stable disease | 30 Participants |
| Dacomitinib | Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) Based on IRC Review | Indeterminate | 15 Participants |
| Dacomitinib | Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) Based on IRC Review | Partial response | 158 Participants |
| Gefitinib | Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) Based on IRC Review | Indeterminate | 22 Participants |
| Gefitinib | Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) Based on IRC Review | Complete response | 4 Participants |
| Gefitinib | Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) Based on IRC Review | Partial response | 157 Participants |
| Gefitinib | Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) Based on IRC Review | Stable disease | 27 Participants |
| Gefitinib | Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) Based on IRC Review | Progressive disease | 15 Participants |
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Vital Signs
Criteria for vital signs abnormalities: postbaseline pulse rate less than (\<) 50 beats per minute (bpm) or greater than (\>)130 bpm and maximum increase from baseline in pulse rate \>=30 bpm and maximum decrease from baseline in pulse rate \<=30 bpm. Systolic blood pressure (BP) of maximum increase from baseline (MIB) \>=40 millimeters of mercury (mmHg), maximum decrease from baseline (MDB) in systolic blood pressure =\<60 mmHg. Diastolic blood pressure of MIB \>=20 mmHg and MDB in diastolic blood pressure \>-40 and =\<-20 mm Hg. And MDB in diastolic BP\<=-40 mmHg. Only categories with at least 1 participant with abnormality are reported in this outcome measure.
Time frame: From randomization until death or last date known as alive, up to 61 months
Population: Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication, with treatment assignments designated according to actual study treatment received.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dacomitinib | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Vital Signs | MIB in diastolic BP >=20 mmHg | 42 Participants |
| Dacomitinib | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Vital Signs | Minimum post baseline pulse rate <50 bpm | 3 Participants |
| Dacomitinib | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Vital Signs | MDB in systolic BP <=-60 mmHg | 0 Participants |
| Dacomitinib | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Vital Signs | MIB in pulse rate >=30 bpm | 16 Participants |
| Dacomitinib | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Vital Signs | MDB in diastolic BP >-40 and <=-20mmHg | 51 Participants |
| Dacomitinib | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Vital Signs | MDB in pulse rate <=-30 bpm | 17 Participants |
| Dacomitinib | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Vital Signs | MIB in systolic BP >=40 mmHg | 16 Participants |
| Dacomitinib | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Vital Signs | MIB in body weight >=10% | 28 Participants |
| Dacomitinib | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Vital Signs | MDB in diastolic BP <=-40 mmHg | 0 Participants |
| Dacomitinib | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Vital Signs | MDB in body weight <=-10% | 46 Participants |
| Dacomitinib | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Vital Signs | Maximum post baseline pulse rate >130 bpm | 2 Participants |
| Gefitinib | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Vital Signs | MDB in body weight <=-10% | 32 Participants |
| Gefitinib | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Vital Signs | MIB in systolic BP >=40 mmHg | 22 Participants |
| Gefitinib | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Vital Signs | MDB in systolic BP <=-60 mmHg | 1 Participants |
| Gefitinib | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Vital Signs | MIB in diastolic BP >=20 mmHg | 44 Participants |
| Gefitinib | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Vital Signs | MDB in diastolic BP >-40 and <=-20mmHg | 53 Participants |
| Gefitinib | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Vital Signs | Maximum post baseline pulse rate >130 bpm | 2 Participants |
| Gefitinib | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Vital Signs | Minimum post baseline pulse rate <50 bpm | 0 Participants |
| Gefitinib | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Vital Signs | MIB in pulse rate >=30 bpm | 12 Participants |
| Gefitinib | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Vital Signs | MDB in pulse rate <=-30 bpm | 15 Participants |
| Gefitinib | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Vital Signs | MIB in body weight >=10% | 42 Participants |
| Gefitinib | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Vital Signs | MDB in diastolic BP <=-40 mmHg | 1 Participants |
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormality in Electrocardiogram (ECG)
ECG parameters included corrected QT interval using Bazett's formula (QTcB) and corrected QT interval using Fridericia's formula (QTcF). ECG criteria for abnormality: absolute value 450 - \<480 msec, 480 - \<500 msec, \>=500msec. The number of participants with potentially clinically significant ECG findings at any visit were reported.
Time frame: From randomization until death or last date known as alive, up to 61 months
Population: Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication, with treatment assignments designated according to actual study treatment received. Here, N (number of participants analyzed) signifies participants who were evaluable for this specified outcome measure.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dacomitinib | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormality in Electrocardiogram (ECG) | QTcF Criteria: 450-<480 | 5 Participants |
| Dacomitinib | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormality in Electrocardiogram (ECG) | QTcB Criteria: 450-<480 | 22 Participants |
| Dacomitinib | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormality in Electrocardiogram (ECG) | QTcB Criteria: 480-<500 | 3 Participants |
| Gefitinib | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormality in Electrocardiogram (ECG) | QTcF Criteria: 450-<480 | 0 Participants |
| Gefitinib | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormality in Electrocardiogram (ECG) | QTcB Criteria: 450-<480 | 0 Participants |
| Gefitinib | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormality in Electrocardiogram (ECG) | QTcB Criteria: 480-<500 | 0 Participants |
Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities of Grade 3 or Higher Severity Based on NCI CTCAE Version 4.03: Biochemistry and Haematology
Parameters included anaemia, activated partial thromboplastin time, haemoglobin, international normalized ratio, lymphocyte count, lymphopenia, neutrophils (absolute), platelets, prothrombin time and white blood cells. Biochemistry parameters included alanine aminotransferase (increased), alkaline phosphatase (increased), aspartate aminotransferase (increased), bilirubin (total), creatinine (increased), hypercalcaemia, hyperglycaemia, hyperkalaemia, hypermagnesaemia, hypernatraemia, hypoalbuminaemia, hypocalcaemia, hypoglycaemia, hypokalaemia, hypomagnesaemia, hyponatraemia. Test abnormalities were graded by AEs according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events(NCI CTCAE) version 4.03 as Grade 1=mild; Grade 2=moderate; Grade 3=severe; Grade 4=life-threatening; Grade 5=death related to AE. Only categories with at least 1 participant with abnormality are reported in this outcome measure.
Time frame: From randomization until death or last date known as alive, up to 61 months
Population: Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication, with treatment assignments designated according to actual study treatment received.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dacomitinib | Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities of Grade 3 or Higher Severity Based on NCI CTCAE Version 4.03: Biochemistry and Haematology | Alanine aminotransferase increased (Grade 4) | 0 Participants |
| Dacomitinib | Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities of Grade 3 or Higher Severity Based on NCI CTCAE Version 4.03: Biochemistry and Haematology | Hyperglycemia (Grade 3) | 2 Participants |
| Dacomitinib | Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities of Grade 3 or Higher Severity Based on NCI CTCAE Version 4.03: Biochemistry and Haematology | Neutrophil count (absolute) (Grade 3) | 0 Participants |
| Dacomitinib | Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities of Grade 3 or Higher Severity Based on NCI CTCAE Version 4.03: Biochemistry and Haematology | Hyperkalemia (Grade 3) | 0 Participants |
| Dacomitinib | Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities of Grade 3 or Higher Severity Based on NCI CTCAE Version 4.03: Biochemistry and Haematology | Aspartate aminotransferase increased (Grade 3) | 2 Participants |
| Dacomitinib | Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities of Grade 3 or Higher Severity Based on NCI CTCAE Version 4.03: Biochemistry and Haematology | Hyperkalemia (Grade 4) | 0 Participants |
| Dacomitinib | Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities of Grade 3 or Higher Severity Based on NCI CTCAE Version 4.03: Biochemistry and Haematology | Anaemia (Grade 3) | 5 Participants |
| Dacomitinib | Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities of Grade 3 or Higher Severity Based on NCI CTCAE Version 4.03: Biochemistry and Haematology | Hypermagnesemia (Grade 3) | 9 Participants |
| Dacomitinib | Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities of Grade 3 or Higher Severity Based on NCI CTCAE Version 4.03: Biochemistry and Haematology | Aspartate aminotransferase increased (Grade 4) | 0 Participants |
| Dacomitinib | Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities of Grade 3 or Higher Severity Based on NCI CTCAE Version 4.03: Biochemistry and Haematology | Hypocalcemia (Grade 3) | 3 Participants |
| Dacomitinib | Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities of Grade 3 or Higher Severity Based on NCI CTCAE Version 4.03: Biochemistry and Haematology | WBC count (Grade 3) | 1 Participants |
| Dacomitinib | Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities of Grade 3 or Higher Severity Based on NCI CTCAE Version 4.03: Biochemistry and Haematology | Hypoglycemia (Grade 3) | 0 Participants |
| Dacomitinib | Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities of Grade 3 or Higher Severity Based on NCI CTCAE Version 4.03: Biochemistry and Haematology | Alkaline phosphatase increased (Grade 3) | 2 Participants |
| Dacomitinib | Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities of Grade 3 or Higher Severity Based on NCI CTCAE Version 4.03: Biochemistry and Haematology | Hypoglycemia (Grade 4) | 1 Participants |
| Dacomitinib | Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities of Grade 3 or Higher Severity Based on NCI CTCAE Version 4.03: Biochemistry and Haematology | Lymphopenia (Grade 3) | 13 Participants |
| Dacomitinib | Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities of Grade 3 or Higher Severity Based on NCI CTCAE Version 4.03: Biochemistry and Haematology | Hypokalemia (Grade 3) | 13 Participants |
| Dacomitinib | Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities of Grade 3 or Higher Severity Based on NCI CTCAE Version 4.03: Biochemistry and Haematology | Bilirubin increased (total) (Grade 3) | 1 Participants |
| Dacomitinib | Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities of Grade 3 or Higher Severity Based on NCI CTCAE Version 4.03: Biochemistry and Haematology | Hypokalemia (Grade 4) | 2 Participants |
| Dacomitinib | Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities of Grade 3 or Higher Severity Based on NCI CTCAE Version 4.03: Biochemistry and Haematology | Alanine aminotransferase increased (Grade 3) | 5 Participants |
| Dacomitinib | Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities of Grade 3 or Higher Severity Based on NCI CTCAE Version 4.03: Biochemistry and Haematology | Hypomagnesemia (Grade 3) | 2 Participants |
| Dacomitinib | Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities of Grade 3 or Higher Severity Based on NCI CTCAE Version 4.03: Biochemistry and Haematology | Creatinine increased (Grade 3) | 1 Participants |
| Dacomitinib | Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities of Grade 3 or Higher Severity Based on NCI CTCAE Version 4.03: Biochemistry and Haematology | Hyponatremia (Grade 3) | 5 Participants |
| Dacomitinib | Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities of Grade 3 or Higher Severity Based on NCI CTCAE Version 4.03: Biochemistry and Haematology | Haemoglobin increased(Grade 3) | 0 Participants |
| Dacomitinib | Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities of Grade 3 or Higher Severity Based on NCI CTCAE Version 4.03: Biochemistry and Haematology | Hyponatremia (Grade 4) | 1 Participants |
| Dacomitinib | Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities of Grade 3 or Higher Severity Based on NCI CTCAE Version 4.03: Biochemistry and Haematology | Hypercalcemia (Grade 3) | 1 Participants |
| Gefitinib | Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities of Grade 3 or Higher Severity Based on NCI CTCAE Version 4.03: Biochemistry and Haematology | Hyponatremia (Grade 4) | 1 Participants |
| Gefitinib | Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities of Grade 3 or Higher Severity Based on NCI CTCAE Version 4.03: Biochemistry and Haematology | Anaemia (Grade 3) | 6 Participants |
| Gefitinib | Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities of Grade 3 or Higher Severity Based on NCI CTCAE Version 4.03: Biochemistry and Haematology | Haemoglobin increased(Grade 3) | 1 Participants |
| Gefitinib | Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities of Grade 3 or Higher Severity Based on NCI CTCAE Version 4.03: Biochemistry and Haematology | Lymphopenia (Grade 3) | 6 Participants |
| Gefitinib | Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities of Grade 3 or Higher Severity Based on NCI CTCAE Version 4.03: Biochemistry and Haematology | Neutrophil count (absolute) (Grade 3) | 2 Participants |
| Gefitinib | Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities of Grade 3 or Higher Severity Based on NCI CTCAE Version 4.03: Biochemistry and Haematology | WBC count (Grade 3) | 1 Participants |
| Gefitinib | Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities of Grade 3 or Higher Severity Based on NCI CTCAE Version 4.03: Biochemistry and Haematology | Alanine aminotransferase increased (Grade 3) | 26 Participants |
| Gefitinib | Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities of Grade 3 or Higher Severity Based on NCI CTCAE Version 4.03: Biochemistry and Haematology | Alanine aminotransferase increased (Grade 4) | 3 Participants |
| Gefitinib | Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities of Grade 3 or Higher Severity Based on NCI CTCAE Version 4.03: Biochemistry and Haematology | Aspartate aminotransferase increased (Grade 3) | 15 Participants |
| Gefitinib | Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities of Grade 3 or Higher Severity Based on NCI CTCAE Version 4.03: Biochemistry and Haematology | Aspartate aminotransferase increased (Grade 4) | 3 Participants |
| Gefitinib | Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities of Grade 3 or Higher Severity Based on NCI CTCAE Version 4.03: Biochemistry and Haematology | Alkaline phosphatase increased (Grade 3) | 5 Participants |
| Gefitinib | Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities of Grade 3 or Higher Severity Based on NCI CTCAE Version 4.03: Biochemistry and Haematology | Bilirubin increased (total) (Grade 3) | 1 Participants |
| Gefitinib | Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities of Grade 3 or Higher Severity Based on NCI CTCAE Version 4.03: Biochemistry and Haematology | Creatinine increased (Grade 3) | 1 Participants |
| Gefitinib | Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities of Grade 3 or Higher Severity Based on NCI CTCAE Version 4.03: Biochemistry and Haematology | Hypercalcemia (Grade 3) | 0 Participants |
| Gefitinib | Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities of Grade 3 or Higher Severity Based on NCI CTCAE Version 4.03: Biochemistry and Haematology | Hyperglycemia (Grade 3) | 5 Participants |
| Gefitinib | Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities of Grade 3 or Higher Severity Based on NCI CTCAE Version 4.03: Biochemistry and Haematology | Hyperkalemia (Grade 3) | 1 Participants |
| Gefitinib | Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities of Grade 3 or Higher Severity Based on NCI CTCAE Version 4.03: Biochemistry and Haematology | Hyperkalemia (Grade 4) | 2 Participants |
| Gefitinib | Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities of Grade 3 or Higher Severity Based on NCI CTCAE Version 4.03: Biochemistry and Haematology | Hypermagnesemia (Grade 3) | 7 Participants |
| Gefitinib | Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities of Grade 3 or Higher Severity Based on NCI CTCAE Version 4.03: Biochemistry and Haematology | Hypocalcemia (Grade 3) | 4 Participants |
| Gefitinib | Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities of Grade 3 or Higher Severity Based on NCI CTCAE Version 4.03: Biochemistry and Haematology | Hypoglycemia (Grade 3) | 2 Participants |
| Gefitinib | Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities of Grade 3 or Higher Severity Based on NCI CTCAE Version 4.03: Biochemistry and Haematology | Hypoglycemia (Grade 4) | 0 Participants |
| Gefitinib | Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities of Grade 3 or Higher Severity Based on NCI CTCAE Version 4.03: Biochemistry and Haematology | Hypokalemia (Grade 3) | 5 Participants |
| Gefitinib | Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities of Grade 3 or Higher Severity Based on NCI CTCAE Version 4.03: Biochemistry and Haematology | Hypokalemia (Grade 4) | 0 Participants |
| Gefitinib | Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities of Grade 3 or Higher Severity Based on NCI CTCAE Version 4.03: Biochemistry and Haematology | Hypomagnesemia (Grade 3) | 0 Participants |
| Gefitinib | Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities of Grade 3 or Higher Severity Based on NCI CTCAE Version 4.03: Biochemistry and Haematology | Hyponatremia (Grade 3) | 4 Participants |
Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities: Urinalysis
Urinalysis parameter included urine protein, urine blood/haemoglobin, urine glucose and urine sediment. Test abnormalities was defined as deviation from normal range (higher or lower). Normal range of 24-hour urine protein test: less than 150 mg of protein per day, urine glucose: 0 to 0.8 mmol/L (millimole per liter), urine protein: 0 to 20 mg/dL (milligrams per deciliter). Urine blood/haemoglobin abnormality was defined as presence and absence of blood/haemoglobin in urine of participants. Urine sediment abnormality was defined as the presence of any bacteria, casts, crystals, and epithelial cells. Only categories with at least 1 participant with abnormality are reported in this outcome measure.
Time frame: From randomization until death or last date known as alive, up to 61 months
Population: Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication, with treatment assignments designated according to actual study treatment received.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dacomitinib | Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities: Urinalysis | High Urine Protein | 1 Participants |
| Dacomitinib | Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities: Urinalysis | Low Urine Glucose | 1 Participants |
| Dacomitinib | Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities: Urinalysis | High Urine Blood/Haemoglobin | 4 Participants |
| Gefitinib | Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities: Urinalysis | Low Urine Glucose | 0 Participants |
| Gefitinib | Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities: Urinalysis | High Urine Protein | 1 Participants |
| Gefitinib | Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities: Urinalysis | High Urine Blood/Haemoglobin | 4 Participants |
Number of Participants With Maximum Relative Decrease From Baseline >20% in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF)
An ejection fraction (EF) was the volumetric fraction of blood ejected from a ventricle of the heart with each heartbeat; it was a measure of the pumping efficiency of the heart. The EF of the left heart, known as the left ventricular ejection fraction, was a measure of the efficiency of pumping into the body's systemic circulation.
Time frame: From baseline up to 7 days of Cycle 4 (up to 91 days)
Population: Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication, with treatment assignments designated according to actual study treatment received. Here N signifies number of participants who were evaluable for this specified outcome measure.
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| Dacomitinib | Number of Participants With Maximum Relative Decrease From Baseline >20% in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) | 5 Participants |
| Gefitinib | Number of Participants With Maximum Relative Decrease From Baseline >20% in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) | 5 Participants |
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship.AEs included both serious and non- serious adverse events. An SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. Treatment-emergent AEs were events between first dose of study drug and up to 28-35 days after last dose that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pretreatment state.
Time frame: From randomization until death or last date known as alive, up to 91 months
Population: Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication, with treatment assignments designated according to actual study treatment received.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dacomitinib | Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) | TEAEs | 226 Participants |
| Dacomitinib | Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) | SAEs | 69 Participants |
| Gefitinib | Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) | TEAEs | 220 Participants |
| Gefitinib | Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) | SAEs | 53 Participants |
| Dacomitinib (Ongoing at DCO) | Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) | TEAEs | 11 Participants |
| Dacomitinib (Ongoing at DCO) | Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) | SAEs | 4 Participants |
Objective Response Rate (ORR) Based on Investigator Assessment
Percentage of participants with a BOR of either CR or PR based on investigator assessment recorded from the start of treatment until disease progression based on RECIST v1.1. CR: disappearance of all target lesions (TLs), non TLs; any pathological lymph nodes (LN) must reduce in short axis to \<10 mm; normalization of tumour marker level, for non TL all LN must be non-pathological in size (\<10 mm short axis); PR:\>=30% decrease in sum of diameters of TLs, referring baseline sum diameters. PD:\>=20% increase in sum of diameters of TLs, referring smallest sum on study, sum must be an absolute increase of \>=5 mm, appearance of \>=1 new lesions; unequivocal progression of existing non TLs.
Time frame: Day 28 of Cycle 1, Cycle 2 then every 8 weeks until disease progression (up to 48 months)
Population: ITT Population included all randomized participants, with study treatment assignment designated according to initial randomization, regardless of whether participants received study treatment or a different treatment from that to which they were randomized.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Dacomitinib | Objective Response Rate (ORR) Based on Investigator Assessment | 75.3 percentage of participants |
| Gefitinib | Objective Response Rate (ORR) Based on Investigator Assessment | 70.2 percentage of participants |
Objective Response Rate (ORR) Based on IRC Review
Percentage of participants with a BOR of either CR or PR based on IRC review recorded from the start of treatment until disease progression based on RECIST v1.1. CR: disappearance of all target lesions (TLs), non TLs; any pathological lymph nodes (LN) must reduce in short axis to \<10 mm; normalization of tumour marker level, for non TL all LN must be non-pathological in size (\<10 mm short axis); PR:\>=30% decrease in sum of diameters of TLs, referring baseline sum diameters. PD:\>=20% increase in sum of diameters of TLs, referring smallest sum on study, sum must be an absolute increase of \>=5 mm, appearance of \>=1 new lesions; unequivocal progression of existing non TLs.
Time frame: Day 28 of Cycle 1, Cycle 2 then every 8 weeks until disease progression (up to 48 months)
Population: ITT Population included all randomized participants, with study treatment assignment designated according to initial randomization, regardless of whether participants received study treatment or a different treatment from that to which they were randomized.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Dacomitinib | Objective Response Rate (ORR) Based on IRC Review | 74.9 percentage of participants |
| Gefitinib | Objective Response Rate (ORR) Based on IRC Review | 71.6 percentage of participants |
OS at 30 Months (OS30m)
OS30m was defined as the probability of a participant being alive at 30 months from date of randomization.
Time frame: Up to 30 months from date of randomization
Population: ITT Population included all randomized participants, with study treatment assignment designated according to initial randomization, regardless of whether participants received study treatment or a different treatment from that to which they were randomized.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Dacomitinib | OS at 30 Months (OS30m) | 56.4 probability of survival |
| Gefitinib | OS at 30 Months (OS30m) | 45.7 probability of survival |
Overall Mean Scores of Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension Visual Analog Scale (EQ-5D VAS)
The Euro Quality of Life-5 dimension (EQ-5D) is a brief self-administered, validated reliable generic health status instrument. EQ-5D general health status can also be measured by a visual analog scale (EQ-5D VAS). EQ-5D VAS measures the participant's self-rated health status on a scale from 0 (worst imaginable health state) to 100 (best imaginable health state).
Time frame: From Cycle 1 Day 1 up to 48 months
Population: PRO analysis set included all enrolled participants, who started treatment and completed a baseline PRO assessments and at least one post-baseline PRO assessment after the first dose. Here N signifies number of participants who were evaluable for this specified outcome measure.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Dacomitinib | Overall Mean Scores of Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension Visual Analog Scale (EQ-5D VAS) | 73.3869 units on a scale |
| Gefitinib | Overall Mean Scores of Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension Visual Analog Scale (EQ-5D VAS) | 77.6923 units on a scale |
Overall Survival (OS)
OS was defined as the time from randomization to the date of death for any cause. In the absence of confirmation of death, survival time was censored at the last date the participant was known to be alive. OS (month)=\[death date or last known alive date - randomization date + 1\]/30.4375.
Time frame: From randomization until death or last date known as alive, up to 45 months
Population: ITT Population included all randomized participants, with study treatment assignment designated according to initial randomization, regardless of whether participants received study treatment or a different treatment from that to which they were randomized.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Dacomitinib | Overall Survival (OS) | 34.1 months |
| Gefitinib | Overall Survival (OS) | 27.0 months |
Pre-dose Plasma Concentrations (Ctrough) of Dacomitinib and Its Metabolite PF-05199265
Trough plasma concentration was defined as the measured concentration at the end of a dosing interval at steady state (taken directly before next administration).
Time frame: Pre-dose on Day 1 of Cycle 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6
Population: PK analysis set included all participants who were treated with dacomitinib with at least one measured plasma concentration and were dose-compliant. Dose-compliant participants were those who received 45 mg dacomitinib daily without interruptions or dose reductions for at least 14 days prior to the day of data collection. Here, 'Number Analyzed' = participants evaluable for this outcome measure at specified time points.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dacomitinib | Pre-dose Plasma Concentrations (Ctrough) of Dacomitinib and Its Metabolite PF-05199265 | Cycle 5 Day 1: PF-05199265 | 12.48 ng/mL | Standard Deviation 6.69 |
| Dacomitinib | Pre-dose Plasma Concentrations (Ctrough) of Dacomitinib and Its Metabolite PF-05199265 | Cycle 3 Day 1: PF-05199265 | 14.42 ng/mL | Standard Deviation 9.1 |
| Dacomitinib | Pre-dose Plasma Concentrations (Ctrough) of Dacomitinib and Its Metabolite PF-05199265 | Cycle 2 Day 1: Dacomitinib | 70.24 ng/mL | Standard Deviation 27.16 |
| Dacomitinib | Pre-dose Plasma Concentrations (Ctrough) of Dacomitinib and Its Metabolite PF-05199265 | Cycle 3 Day 1: Dacomitinib | 68.34 ng/mL | Standard Deviation 25.8 |
| Dacomitinib | Pre-dose Plasma Concentrations (Ctrough) of Dacomitinib and Its Metabolite PF-05199265 | Cycle 4 Day 1: Dacomitinib | 68.16 ng/mL | Standard Deviation 25.49 |
| Dacomitinib | Pre-dose Plasma Concentrations (Ctrough) of Dacomitinib and Its Metabolite PF-05199265 | Cycle 5 Day 1: Dacomitinib | 64.50 ng/mL | Standard Deviation 25.52 |
| Dacomitinib | Pre-dose Plasma Concentrations (Ctrough) of Dacomitinib and Its Metabolite PF-05199265 | Cycle 6 Day 1: Dacomitinib | 61.68 ng/mL | Standard Deviation 22.58 |
| Dacomitinib | Pre-dose Plasma Concentrations (Ctrough) of Dacomitinib and Its Metabolite PF-05199265 | Cycle 2 Day 1: PF-05199265 | 13.20 ng/mL | Standard Deviation 8.55 |
| Dacomitinib | Pre-dose Plasma Concentrations (Ctrough) of Dacomitinib and Its Metabolite PF-05199265 | Cycle 4 Day 1: PF-05199265 | 13.70 ng/mL | Standard Deviation 8.33 |
| Dacomitinib | Pre-dose Plasma Concentrations (Ctrough) of Dacomitinib and Its Metabolite PF-05199265 | Cycle 6 Day 1: PF-05199265 | 13.05 ng/mL | Standard Deviation 6.52 |
Progression Free Survival (PFS) Based on Investigator Assessment
PFS: time from randomization to date of PD as determined by investigator assessment as per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) v1.1 criteria or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. PD for target lesions: 20% increase in sum of diameters of target measurable lesions above smallest sum observed, with minimum absolute increase of 5 mm; for non-target lesions: unequivocal progression of pre-existing lesions. Overall tumor burden increased sufficiently to merit discontinuation of therapy. In presence of stable disease (did not achieve partial response, complete response or PD) or partial response (\>=30% decrease under baseline of sum of diameters of all target measurable lesions, short diameter used in the sum for target nodes, longest diameter used in sum for all other target lesions) in target disease; for new lesions: appearance of any new unequivocal malignant lesion indicated PD.
Time frame: Day 28 of Cycle 1, Cycle 2 then every 8 weeks until disease progression or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first (up to 48 months)
Population: ITT Population included all randomized participants, with study treatment assignment designated according to initial randomization, regardless of whether participants received study treatment or a different treatment from that to which they were randomized.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Dacomitinib | Progression Free Survival (PFS) Based on Investigator Assessment | 16.6 months |
| Gefitinib | Progression Free Survival (PFS) Based on Investigator Assessment | 11.0 months |
Time to Reach Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of Dacomitinib and Its Metabolite PF-05199265
Tmax was defined as time to first occurrence of Cmax and can be observed directly from data as time of first occurrence.
Time frame: Pre-dose and 2, 4, 6, 8, and 24 hours post-dose (sample collection time points had window of +/- 10% of nominal time) on Cycle 2 Day 1 (Day 29)
Population: PK analysis set included all participants who were treated with dacomitinib with at least 1 measured plasma concentration and were dose-compliant (who received 45 mg dacomitinib daily without interruptions/dose reductions for at least 14 days prior to day of data collection). This outcome measure was planned to be analyzed in Chinese subgroup only.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dacomitinib | Time to Reach Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of Dacomitinib and Its Metabolite PF-05199265 | Dacomitinib | 4.03 hour |
| Dacomitinib | Time to Reach Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of Dacomitinib and Its Metabolite PF-05199265 | PF-05199265 | 6.0 hour |