Skip to content

ARCHER1050: A Study of Dacomitinib vs. Gefitinib in 1st-Line Treatment Of Advanced NSCLC.

ARCHER 1050: A RANDOMIZED, OPEN-LABEL, PHASE 3, EFFICACY AND SAFETY STUDY OF DACOMITINIB (PF-00299804) VERSUS GEFITINIB FOR THE FIRST LINE TREATMENT OF LOCALLY ADVANCED OR METASTATIC NON-SMALL CELL LUNG CANCER IN SUBJECTS WITH EPIDERMAL GROWTH FACTOR RECEPTOR (EGFR) ACTIVATING MUTATION(S)

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01774721
Enrollment
452
Registered
2013-01-24
Start date
2013-05-09
Completion date
2022-01-27
Last updated
2023-11-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Non-small Cell Lung Cancer With EGFR-Activating Mutations

Keywords

first-line, locally advanced or metastatic, non-small cell lung cancer, epidermal growth factor receptor, EGFR, ARCHER, mutation, dacomitinib, PF-00299804

Brief summary

This is a multinational, multicenter, randomized, open-label, Phase 3 study comparing the efficacy and safety of treatment with dacomitinib (PF-00299804) to treatment with gefitinib in patients with locally advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer, with epidermal growth factor receptor EGFR-activating mutation (s). Analyses of primary objective (Progression Free Survival) will be done as defined in the protocol.

Detailed description

452 patients were randomized in a 1:1 ratio between dacomitinib (PF-00299804 ) vs. gefitinib.

Interventions

Dacomitinib (PF-00299804) 45 mg tablets, continuous oral daily dosing.

DRUGGefitinib

Gefitinib 250 mg tablets, continuous oral daily dosing.

Sponsors

Pfizer
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 99 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Evidence of histo or cytopathology confirmed, advanced NSCLC (with known histology) with the presence of EGFR-activating mutation (exon 19 deletion or the L858R mutation in exon 21). * It is acceptable for subjects with the presence of the exon 20 T790M mutation together with either EGFR-activating mutation (exon 19 deletion or the L858R mutation in exon 21) to be included in this study * No prior treatment with systemic therapy for locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC. Minimum of 12 months disease free interval between completion of neoadjuvant/adjuvant systemic therapy and recurrence of NSCLC * Adequate tissue sample must be available for central analyses. * Adequate renal, hematologic, liver function. * ECOG PS of 0-1. * Radiologically measurable disease.

Exclusion criteria

* Any evidence of mixed histology that includes elements of small cell or carcinoid lung cancer. * Any other mutation other than exon 19 deletion or L858R in exon 21, with or without the presence of the exon 20 T790M mutation. * Any history of brain metastases or leptomeningeal metastases. * Any previous anti-cancer systemic treatment of early, locally advanced, or metastatic NSCLC. * Any surgery(not including minor procedures such as lymph node biopsy), palliative radiotherapy or pleurodesis within 2 weeks of baseline assessments * Any clinically significant gastrointestinal abnormalities that may impair intake, transit or absorption of the study drug. * Current enrollment in another therapeutic clinical study. * History of, or currently suspected, diffuse non-infectious pneumonitis or interstitial lung disease * Uncontrolled medical disorders. * Prior malignancy and concurrent malignancy except for non melanoma skin cancer or in-situ cervical cancer with no evidence of active disease. * Use of narrow therapeutic index drugs that are CYP2D6 substrates from screening to randomization.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Progression Free Survival (PFS) Based on Independent Radiologic Central (IRC) ReviewDay 28 of Cycle 1, Cycle 2 then every 8 weeks until disease progression or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first (up to 48 months)PFS: time from randomization to date of progression of disease (PD) as determined by IRC review as per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) v1.1 criteria or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. PD: \>=20% increase in sum of diameters of target lesions (TLs), referring smallest sum on study, sum must be an absolute increase of \>=5 mm, appearance of \>=1 new lesions; unequivocal progression of existing non TLs. Overall tumor burden increased sufficiently to merit discontinuation of therapy. In presence of stable disease (did not achieve partial response, complete response or PD) or partial response (\>=30% decrease under baseline of sum of diameters of all target measurable lesions, short diameter used in the sum for target nodes, longest diameter used in sum for all other target lesions) in target disease; for new lesions: appearance of any new unequivocal malignant lesion indicated PD.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
OS at 30 Months (OS30m)Up to 30 months from date of randomizationOS30m was defined as the probability of a participant being alive at 30 months from date of randomization.
Progression Free Survival (PFS) Based on Investigator AssessmentDay 28 of Cycle 1, Cycle 2 then every 8 weeks until disease progression or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first (up to 48 months)PFS: time from randomization to date of PD as determined by investigator assessment as per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) v1.1 criteria or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. PD for target lesions: 20% increase in sum of diameters of target measurable lesions above smallest sum observed, with minimum absolute increase of 5 mm; for non-target lesions: unequivocal progression of pre-existing lesions. Overall tumor burden increased sufficiently to merit discontinuation of therapy. In presence of stable disease (did not achieve partial response, complete response or PD) or partial response (\>=30% decrease under baseline of sum of diameters of all target measurable lesions, short diameter used in the sum for target nodes, longest diameter used in sum for all other target lesions) in target disease; for new lesions: appearance of any new unequivocal malignant lesion indicated PD.
Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) Based on IRC ReviewDay 28 of Cycle 1, Cycle 2 then every 8 weeks until disease progression (up to 48 months)BOR for CR/PR:\>=1 objective status (OBS) of CR/PR documented before PD; SD:\>=1 OBS of stable documented \>=8 weeks (wks) post treatment & before PD, not qualifying as CR/PR; PD:OBS of PD within 12 wks treatment, not qualifying as CR/PR/SD; indeterminate:PD not documented within 12 wks post treatment & no other response category applies. RECIST v1.1, CR:disappearance of all target lesions (TLs), non TLs;any pathological lymph nodes (LN) must reduce in short axis to \<10 mm; normalization of tumour marker level, for non TL all LN must be non-pathological in size (\<10 mm short axis); PR:\>=30% decrease in sum of diameters of TLs, referring baseline sum diameters. SD:neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD, referring smallest sum diameters on study. PD:\>=20% increase in sum of diameters of TLs, referring smallest sum on study, sum must be an absolute increase of \>=5 mm, appearance of \>=1 new lesions;unequivocal progression of existing non TLs.
Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) Based on Investigator AssessmentDay 28 of Cycle 1, Cycle 2 then every 8 weeks until disease progression (up to 48 months)BOR for CR/PR:\>=1 objective status (OBS) of CR/PR documented before PD; SD:\>=1 OBS of stable documented \>=8 weeks (wks) post treatment & before PD, not qualifying as CR/PR; PD:OBS of PD within 12 wks treatment, not qualifying as CR/PR/SD; indeterminate:PD not documented within 12 wks post treatment & no other response category applies. RECIST v1.1, CR:disappearance of all target lesions (TLs), non TLs;any pathological lymph nodes (LN) must reduce in short axis to \<10 mm; normalization of tumour marker level, for non TL all LN must be non-pathological in size (\<10 mm short axis); PR:\>=30% decrease in sum of diameters of TLs, referring baseline sum diameters. SD:neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD, referring smallest sum diameters on study. PD:\>=20% increase in sum of diameters of TLs, referring smallest sum on study, sum must be an absolute increase of \>=5 mm, appearance of \>=1 new lesions;unequivocal progression of existing non TLs.
Duration of Response (DoR)Day 28 of Cycle 1, Cycle 2 then every 8 weeks until disease progression or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first (up to 48 months)DoR was defined as time from first documentation of objective response(CR or PR, whichever occurred first)to date of PD/death from any cause, whichever occurred first. CR: disappearance of all target lesions (TLs), non TLs; any pathological lymph nodes (LN) must reduce in short axis to \<10 mm; normalization of tumour marker level, for non TL all LN must be non-pathological in size (\<10 mm short axis); PR:\>=30% decrease in sum of diameters of TLs, referring baseline sum diameters. PD:\>=20% increase in sum of diameters of TLs, referring smallest sum on study, sum must be an absolute increase of \>=5 mm, appearance of \>=1 new lesions; unequivocal progression of existing non TLs. DoR was recorded based on IRC review and investigator's assessment and summarized for subgroup of participants with objective disease response.
Objective Response Rate (ORR) Based on IRC ReviewDay 28 of Cycle 1, Cycle 2 then every 8 weeks until disease progression (up to 48 months)Percentage of participants with a BOR of either CR or PR based on IRC review recorded from the start of treatment until disease progression based on RECIST v1.1. CR: disappearance of all target lesions (TLs), non TLs; any pathological lymph nodes (LN) must reduce in short axis to \<10 mm; normalization of tumour marker level, for non TL all LN must be non-pathological in size (\<10 mm short axis); PR:\>=30% decrease in sum of diameters of TLs, referring baseline sum diameters. PD:\>=20% increase in sum of diameters of TLs, referring smallest sum on study, sum must be an absolute increase of \>=5 mm, appearance of \>=1 new lesions; unequivocal progression of existing non TLs.
Objective Response Rate (ORR) Based on Investigator AssessmentDay 28 of Cycle 1, Cycle 2 then every 8 weeks until disease progression (up to 48 months)Percentage of participants with a BOR of either CR or PR based on investigator assessment recorded from the start of treatment until disease progression based on RECIST v1.1. CR: disappearance of all target lesions (TLs), non TLs; any pathological lymph nodes (LN) must reduce in short axis to \<10 mm; normalization of tumour marker level, for non TL all LN must be non-pathological in size (\<10 mm short axis); PR:\>=30% decrease in sum of diameters of TLs, referring baseline sum diameters. PD:\>=20% increase in sum of diameters of TLs, referring smallest sum on study, sum must be an absolute increase of \>=5 mm, appearance of \>=1 new lesions; unequivocal progression of existing non TLs.
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)From randomization until death or last date known as alive, up to 91 monthsAn AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship.AEs included both serious and non- serious adverse events. An SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. Treatment-emergent AEs were events between first dose of study drug and up to 28-35 days after last dose that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pretreatment state.
Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities of Grade 3 or Higher Severity Based on NCI CTCAE Version 4.03: Biochemistry and HaematologyFrom randomization until death or last date known as alive, up to 61 monthsParameters included anaemia, activated partial thromboplastin time, haemoglobin, international normalized ratio, lymphocyte count, lymphopenia, neutrophils (absolute), platelets, prothrombin time and white blood cells. Biochemistry parameters included alanine aminotransferase (increased), alkaline phosphatase (increased), aspartate aminotransferase (increased), bilirubin (total), creatinine (increased), hypercalcaemia, hyperglycaemia, hyperkalaemia, hypermagnesaemia, hypernatraemia, hypoalbuminaemia, hypocalcaemia, hypoglycaemia, hypokalaemia, hypomagnesaemia, hyponatraemia. Test abnormalities were graded by AEs according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events(NCI CTCAE) version 4.03 as Grade 1=mild; Grade 2=moderate; Grade 3=severe; Grade 4=life-threatening; Grade 5=death related to AE. Only categories with at least 1 participant with abnormality are reported in this outcome measure.
Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities: UrinalysisFrom randomization until death or last date known as alive, up to 61 monthsUrinalysis parameter included urine protein, urine blood/haemoglobin, urine glucose and urine sediment. Test abnormalities was defined as deviation from normal range (higher or lower). Normal range of 24-hour urine protein test: less than 150 mg of protein per day, urine glucose: 0 to 0.8 mmol/L (millimole per liter), urine protein: 0 to 20 mg/dL (milligrams per deciliter). Urine blood/haemoglobin abnormality was defined as presence and absence of blood/haemoglobin in urine of participants. Urine sediment abnormality was defined as the presence of any bacteria, casts, crystals, and epithelial cells. Only categories with at least 1 participant with abnormality are reported in this outcome measure.
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Vital SignsFrom randomization until death or last date known as alive, up to 61 monthsCriteria for vital signs abnormalities: postbaseline pulse rate less than (\<) 50 beats per minute (bpm) or greater than (\>)130 bpm and maximum increase from baseline in pulse rate \>=30 bpm and maximum decrease from baseline in pulse rate \<=30 bpm. Systolic blood pressure (BP) of maximum increase from baseline (MIB) \>=40 millimeters of mercury (mmHg), maximum decrease from baseline (MDB) in systolic blood pressure =\<60 mmHg. Diastolic blood pressure of MIB \>=20 mmHg and MDB in diastolic blood pressure \>-40 and =\<-20 mm Hg. And MDB in diastolic BP\<=-40 mmHg. Only categories with at least 1 participant with abnormality are reported in this outcome measure.
Overall Survival (OS)From randomization until death or last date known as alive, up to 45 monthsOS was defined as the time from randomization to the date of death for any cause. In the absence of confirmation of death, survival time was censored at the last date the participant was known to be alive. OS (month)=\[death date or last known alive date - randomization date + 1\]/30.4375.
Number of Participants With Maximum Relative Decrease From Baseline >20% in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF)From baseline up to 7 days of Cycle 4 (up to 91 days)An ejection fraction (EF) was the volumetric fraction of blood ejected from a ventricle of the heart with each heartbeat; it was a measure of the pumping efficiency of the heart. The EF of the left heart, known as the left ventricular ejection fraction, was a measure of the efficiency of pumping into the body's systemic circulation.
Health Related Quality of Life (HRQOL): Time to Deterioration (TTD) in Pain, Dyspnea, Fatigue or CoughBaseline until the end of treatment (up to 48 months)HRQOL was measured by standardized questionnaires (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC)) quality of life questionnaires (OLQ-C30) and its lung cancer module (QLQ-LC13). TTD in pain (chest, arm/shoulder), dyspnea, fatigue or cough was defined as time between baseline and first occurrence of increase in score of 10 points or greater from baseline in any of these 4 symptoms for at least two consecutive cycles. For those who had not shown deterioration, the data was censored at the last date when the participants completed an assessment for pain, dyspnea, fatigue or cough.
Overall Mean Scores of Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension Visual Analog Scale (EQ-5D VAS)From Cycle 1 Day 1 up to 48 monthsThe Euro Quality of Life-5 dimension (EQ-5D) is a brief self-administered, validated reliable generic health status instrument. EQ-5D general health status can also be measured by a visual analog scale (EQ-5D VAS). EQ-5D VAS measures the participant's self-rated health status on a scale from 0 (worst imaginable health state) to 100 (best imaginable health state).
Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Dacomitinib and Its Metabolite PF-05199265Pre-dose and 2, 4, 6, 8, and 24 hours post-dose on Cycle 2 Day 1 (Day 29)Cmax was defined as maximum observed plasma concentration and can be observed directly from data.
Time to Reach Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of Dacomitinib and Its Metabolite PF-05199265Pre-dose and 2, 4, 6, 8, and 24 hours post-dose (sample collection time points had window of +/- 10% of nominal time) on Cycle 2 Day 1 (Day 29)Tmax was defined as time to first occurrence of Cmax and can be observed directly from data as time of first occurrence.
Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve From Time Zero (0) to End of Dosing Interval (AUCtau) of Dacomitinib and Its Metabolite PF-05199265Pre-dose and 2, 4, 6, 8, and 24 hours post-dose on Cycle 2 Day 1 (Day 29)AUCtau was defined as area under the plasma concentration-time curve over dosing interval tau and was determined by Linear/Log trapezoidal method.
Averaged Plasma Concentration at Steady State (Cavg) of Dacomitinib and Its Metabolite PF-05199265Pre-dose and 2, 4, 6, 8, and 24 hours post-dose on Cycle 2 Day 1 (Day 29)Cavg was defined as averaged plasma concentration at steady state, and was calculated as AUCtau/tau.
Minimum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmin) of Dacomitinib and Its Metabolite PF-05199265Pre-dose and 2, 4, 6, 8, and 24 hours post-dose on Cycle 2 Day 1 (Day 29)Cmin was defined as minimum observed plasma concentration and can be observed directly from data.
Fluctuation Coefficient Between Trough and Peak Plasma Concentration (DF) of Dacomitinib and Its Metabolite PF-05199265Pre-dose and 2, 4, 6, 8, and 24 hours post-dose on Cycle 2 Day 1 (Day 29)Fluctuation coefficient between trough and peak plasma concentration was determined as Cmax-Ctrough divided by Cavg, where Cmax was the maximum observed concentration within the dosing interval, Ctrough was the observed concentration prior to dose administration and Cavg was averaged plasma concentration at steady state.
Apparent Clearance (CL) of DacomitinibPre-dose and 2, 4, 6, 8, and 24 hours post-dose on Cycle 2 Day 1 (Day 29)Drug clearance was a quantitative measure of the rate at which a drug substance was removed from the blood (rate at which a drug is metabolized or eliminated by normal biological processes).
Pre-dose Plasma Concentrations (Ctrough) of Dacomitinib and Its Metabolite PF-05199265Pre-dose on Day 1 of Cycle 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6Trough plasma concentration was defined as the measured concentration at the end of a dosing interval at steady state (taken directly before next administration).
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormality in Electrocardiogram (ECG)From randomization until death or last date known as alive, up to 61 monthsECG parameters included corrected QT interval using Bazett's formula (QTcB) and corrected QT interval using Fridericia's formula (QTcF). ECG criteria for abnormality: absolute value 450 - \<480 msec, 480 - \<500 msec, \>=500msec. The number of participants with potentially clinically significant ECG findings at any visit were reported.

Countries

China, Hong Kong, Italy, Japan, Poland, South Korea, Spain

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

The study completed enrollment on 25 Mar 2015 with 452 participants randomized, 227 participants to the dacomitinib arm and 225 participants to the gefitinib arm. After the last data cutoff (DCO) date of 13 May 2019, 11 participants remained in the study to continue dacomitinib treatment. All 11 participants were discontinued from the study by last participant last visit (LPLV) on 27 Jan 2022.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Dacomitinib
Participants received 45 mg of dacomitinib tablets orally once daily in each treatment cycle of 28 days, up to a maximum of 48 months until disease progression, intolerable toxicities, withdrawal, death, or investigator decision dictated by protocol compliance, whichever occurred first.
227
Gefitinib
Participants received 250 mg of gefitinib tablets orally once daily in each treatment cycle of 28 days, for maximum of 48 months until disease progression, intolerable toxicities, withdrawal, death, or investigator decision dictated by protocol compliance, whichever occurred first.
225
Total452

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyDeath133152
Overall StudyDid not meet eligibility criteria03
Overall StudyDisease progression50
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up67
Overall StudyOther reasons and patients who completed the 48-month follow-up period5849
Overall StudyStudy terminated by sponsor50
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject2014

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicGefitinibTotalDacomitinib
Age, Continuous60.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.17
61.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.72
61.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.26
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
225 Participants452 Participants227 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
176 Participants346 Participants170 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
49 Participants105 Participants56 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
125 Participants271 Participants146 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
100 Participants181 Participants81 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
133 / 227152 / 2241 / 11
other
Total, other adverse events
224 / 227217 / 22411 / 11
serious
Total, serious adverse events
69 / 22753 / 2244 / 11

Outcome results

Primary

Progression Free Survival (PFS) Based on Independent Radiologic Central (IRC) Review

PFS: time from randomization to date of progression of disease (PD) as determined by IRC review as per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) v1.1 criteria or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. PD: \>=20% increase in sum of diameters of target lesions (TLs), referring smallest sum on study, sum must be an absolute increase of \>=5 mm, appearance of \>=1 new lesions; unequivocal progression of existing non TLs. Overall tumor burden increased sufficiently to merit discontinuation of therapy. In presence of stable disease (did not achieve partial response, complete response or PD) or partial response (\>=30% decrease under baseline of sum of diameters of all target measurable lesions, short diameter used in the sum for target nodes, longest diameter used in sum for all other target lesions) in target disease; for new lesions: appearance of any new unequivocal malignant lesion indicated PD.

Time frame: Day 28 of Cycle 1, Cycle 2 then every 8 weeks until disease progression or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first (up to 48 months)

Population: Intent to treat (ITT) Population included all randomized participants, with study treatment assignment designated according to initial randomization, regardless of whether participants received study treatment or a different treatment from that to which they were randomized.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
DacomitinibProgression Free Survival (PFS) Based on Independent Radiologic Central (IRC) Review14.7 months
GefitinibProgression Free Survival (PFS) Based on Independent Radiologic Central (IRC) Review9.2 months
p-value: <0.000195% CI: [0.469, 0.739]1-sided stratified log-rank test
Secondary

Apparent Clearance (CL) of Dacomitinib

Drug clearance was a quantitative measure of the rate at which a drug substance was removed from the blood (rate at which a drug is metabolized or eliminated by normal biological processes).

Time frame: Pre-dose and 2, 4, 6, 8, and 24 hours post-dose on Cycle 2 Day 1 (Day 29)

Population: PK analysis set included all participants who were treated with dacomitinib with at least 1 measured plasma concentration and were dose-compliant (who received 45 mg dacomitinib daily without interruptions/dose reductions for at least 14 days prior to day of data collection). This outcome measure was planned to be analyzed in Chinese subgroup only.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
DacomitinibApparent Clearance (CL) of Dacomitinib27.61 Liter/hourStandard Deviation 5.97
Secondary

Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve From Time Zero (0) to End of Dosing Interval (AUCtau) of Dacomitinib and Its Metabolite PF-05199265

AUCtau was defined as area under the plasma concentration-time curve over dosing interval tau and was determined by Linear/Log trapezoidal method.

Time frame: Pre-dose and 2, 4, 6, 8, and 24 hours post-dose on Cycle 2 Day 1 (Day 29)

Population: PK analysis set included all participants who were treated with dacomitinib with at least 1 measured plasma concentration and were dose-compliant (who received 45 mg dacomitinib daily without interruptions/dose reductions for at least 14 days prior to day of data collection). This outcome measure was planned to be analyzed in Chinese subgroup only.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
DacomitinibArea Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve From Time Zero (0) to End of Dosing Interval (AUCtau) of Dacomitinib and Its Metabolite PF-05199265Dacomitinib1712.08 nanogram*hour/milliliter (ng*hr/mL)Standard Deviation 413.61
DacomitinibArea Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve From Time Zero (0) to End of Dosing Interval (AUCtau) of Dacomitinib and Its Metabolite PF-05199265PF-05199265278.47 nanogram*hour/milliliter (ng*hr/mL)Standard Deviation 163.53
Secondary

Averaged Plasma Concentration at Steady State (Cavg) of Dacomitinib and Its Metabolite PF-05199265

Cavg was defined as averaged plasma concentration at steady state, and was calculated as AUCtau/tau.

Time frame: Pre-dose and 2, 4, 6, 8, and 24 hours post-dose on Cycle 2 Day 1 (Day 29)

Population: PK analysis set included all participants who were treated with dacomitinib with at least 1 measured plasma concentration and were dose-compliant (who received 45 mg dacomitinib daily without interruptions/dose reductions for at least 14 days prior to day of data collection). This outcome measure was planned to be analyzed in Chinese subgroup only.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
DacomitinibAveraged Plasma Concentration at Steady State (Cavg) of Dacomitinib and Its Metabolite PF-05199265Dacomitinib71.33 ng/mLStandard Deviation 17.23
DacomitinibAveraged Plasma Concentration at Steady State (Cavg) of Dacomitinib and Its Metabolite PF-05199265PF-0519926511.60 ng/mLStandard Deviation 6.81
Secondary

Duration of Response (DoR)

DoR was defined as time from first documentation of objective response(CR or PR, whichever occurred first)to date of PD/death from any cause, whichever occurred first. CR: disappearance of all target lesions (TLs), non TLs; any pathological lymph nodes (LN) must reduce in short axis to \<10 mm; normalization of tumour marker level, for non TL all LN must be non-pathological in size (\<10 mm short axis); PR:\>=30% decrease in sum of diameters of TLs, referring baseline sum diameters. PD:\>=20% increase in sum of diameters of TLs, referring smallest sum on study, sum must be an absolute increase of \>=5 mm, appearance of \>=1 new lesions; unequivocal progression of existing non TLs. DoR was recorded based on IRC review and investigator's assessment and summarized for subgroup of participants with objective disease response.

Time frame: Day 28 of Cycle 1, Cycle 2 then every 8 weeks until disease progression or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first (up to 48 months)

Population: ITT Population included all randomized participants, with study treatment assignment designated according to initial randomization, regardless of whether participants received study treatment or a different treatment from that to which they were randomized.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
DacomitinibDuration of Response (DoR)DoR: IRC review14.8 months
DacomitinibDuration of Response (DoR)DoR: Investigator assessment15.9 months
GefitinibDuration of Response (DoR)DoR: Investigator assessment9.2 months
GefitinibDuration of Response (DoR)DoR: IRC review8.3 months
Comparison: Comparison of dacomitinib vs gefitinib based on IRC reviewp-value: <0.000195% CI: [0.307, 0.529]1-sided stratified log-rank test
Comparison: Comparison of dacomitinib vs gefitinib based on Investigator assessmentp-value: <0.000195% CI: [0.418, 0.711]1-sided stratified log-rank test
Secondary

Fluctuation Coefficient Between Trough and Peak Plasma Concentration (DF) of Dacomitinib and Its Metabolite PF-05199265

Fluctuation coefficient between trough and peak plasma concentration was determined as Cmax-Ctrough divided by Cavg, where Cmax was the maximum observed concentration within the dosing interval, Ctrough was the observed concentration prior to dose administration and Cavg was averaged plasma concentration at steady state.

Time frame: Pre-dose and 2, 4, 6, 8, and 24 hours post-dose on Cycle 2 Day 1 (Day 29)

Population: PK analysis set included all participants who were treated with dacomitinib with at least 1 measured plasma concentration and were dose-compliant (who received 45 mg dacomitinib daily without interruptions/dose reductions for at least 14 days prior to day of data collection). This outcome measure was planned to be analyzed in Chinese subgroup only.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
DacomitinibFluctuation Coefficient Between Trough and Peak Plasma Concentration (DF) of Dacomitinib and Its Metabolite PF-05199265Dacomitinib0.2883 Fluctuation coefficientStandard Deviation 0.146
DacomitinibFluctuation Coefficient Between Trough and Peak Plasma Concentration (DF) of Dacomitinib and Its Metabolite PF-05199265PF-051992650.1105 Fluctuation coefficientStandard Deviation 0.0827
Secondary

Health Related Quality of Life (HRQOL): Time to Deterioration (TTD) in Pain, Dyspnea, Fatigue or Cough

HRQOL was measured by standardized questionnaires (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC)) quality of life questionnaires (OLQ-C30) and its lung cancer module (QLQ-LC13). TTD in pain (chest, arm/shoulder), dyspnea, fatigue or cough was defined as time between baseline and first occurrence of increase in score of 10 points or greater from baseline in any of these 4 symptoms for at least two consecutive cycles. For those who had not shown deterioration, the data was censored at the last date when the participants completed an assessment for pain, dyspnea, fatigue or cough.

Time frame: Baseline until the end of treatment (up to 48 months)

Population: Patient reported outcomes (PRO) analysis set included all enrolled participants, who started treatment and completed a baseline PRO assessments and at least one post-baseline PRO assessment after the first dose.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
DacomitinibHealth Related Quality of Life (HRQOL): Time to Deterioration (TTD) in Pain, Dyspnea, Fatigue or Cough3.8 months
GefitinibHealth Related Quality of Life (HRQOL): Time to Deterioration (TTD) in Pain, Dyspnea, Fatigue or Cough6.6 months
p-value: 0.164195% CI: [0.928, 1.483]Unstratified Log-rank Test
Secondary

Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Dacomitinib and Its Metabolite PF-05199265

Cmax was defined as maximum observed plasma concentration and can be observed directly from data.

Time frame: Pre-dose and 2, 4, 6, 8, and 24 hours post-dose on Cycle 2 Day 1 (Day 29)

Population: Pharmacokinetic (PK) analysis set included all participants who were treated with dacomitinib with at least 1 measured plasma concentration and were dose-compliant (who received 45 mg dacomitinib daily without interruptions/dose reductions for at least 14 days prior to day of data collection). This outcome measure was planned to be analyzed in Chinese subgroup only.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
DacomitinibMaximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Dacomitinib and Its Metabolite PF-05199265Dacomitinib84.19 nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL)Standard Deviation 21.9
DacomitinibMaximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Dacomitinib and Its Metabolite PF-05199265PF-0519926512.77 nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL)Standard Deviation 7.58
Secondary

Minimum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmin) of Dacomitinib and Its Metabolite PF-05199265

Cmin was defined as minimum observed plasma concentration and can be observed directly from data.

Time frame: Pre-dose and 2, 4, 6, 8, and 24 hours post-dose on Cycle 2 Day 1 (Day 29)

Population: PK analysis set included all participants who were treated with dacomitinib with at least 1 measured plasma concentration and were dose-compliant (who received 45 mg dacomitinib daily without interruptions/dose reductions for at least 14 days prior to day of data collection). This outcome measure was planned to be analyzed in Chinese subgroup only.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
DacomitinibMinimum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmin) of Dacomitinib and Its Metabolite PF-05199265Dacomitinib60.64 ng/mLStandard Deviation 14.85
DacomitinibMinimum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmin) of Dacomitinib and Its Metabolite PF-05199265PF-0519926510.49 ng/mLStandard Deviation 6.26
Secondary

Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) Based on Investigator Assessment

BOR for CR/PR:\>=1 objective status (OBS) of CR/PR documented before PD; SD:\>=1 OBS of stable documented \>=8 weeks (wks) post treatment & before PD, not qualifying as CR/PR; PD:OBS of PD within 12 wks treatment, not qualifying as CR/PR/SD; indeterminate:PD not documented within 12 wks post treatment & no other response category applies. RECIST v1.1, CR:disappearance of all target lesions (TLs), non TLs;any pathological lymph nodes (LN) must reduce in short axis to \<10 mm; normalization of tumour marker level, for non TL all LN must be non-pathological in size (\<10 mm short axis); PR:\>=30% decrease in sum of diameters of TLs, referring baseline sum diameters. SD:neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD, referring smallest sum diameters on study. PD:\>=20% increase in sum of diameters of TLs, referring smallest sum on study, sum must be an absolute increase of \>=5 mm, appearance of \>=1 new lesions;unequivocal progression of existing non TLs.

Time frame: Day 28 of Cycle 1, Cycle 2 then every 8 weeks until disease progression (up to 48 months)

Population: ITT Population included all randomized participants, with study treatment assignment designated according to initial randomization, regardless of whether participants received study treatment or a different treatment from that to which they were randomized.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
DacomitinibNumber of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) Based on Investigator AssessmentPartial response169 Participants
DacomitinibNumber of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) Based on Investigator AssessmentProgressive disease9 Participants
DacomitinibNumber of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) Based on Investigator AssessmentStable disease38 Participants
DacomitinibNumber of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) Based on Investigator AssessmentIndeterminate9 Participants
DacomitinibNumber of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) Based on Investigator AssessmentComplete response2 Participants
GefitinibNumber of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) Based on Investigator AssessmentIndeterminate7 Participants
GefitinibNumber of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) Based on Investigator AssessmentComplete response1 Participants
GefitinibNumber of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) Based on Investigator AssessmentPartial response157 Participants
GefitinibNumber of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) Based on Investigator AssessmentStable disease49 Participants
GefitinibNumber of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) Based on Investigator AssessmentProgressive disease11 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) Based on IRC Review

BOR for CR/PR:\>=1 objective status (OBS) of CR/PR documented before PD; SD:\>=1 OBS of stable documented \>=8 weeks (wks) post treatment & before PD, not qualifying as CR/PR; PD:OBS of PD within 12 wks treatment, not qualifying as CR/PR/SD; indeterminate:PD not documented within 12 wks post treatment & no other response category applies. RECIST v1.1, CR:disappearance of all target lesions (TLs), non TLs;any pathological lymph nodes (LN) must reduce in short axis to \<10 mm; normalization of tumour marker level, for non TL all LN must be non-pathological in size (\<10 mm short axis); PR:\>=30% decrease in sum of diameters of TLs, referring baseline sum diameters. SD:neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD, referring smallest sum diameters on study. PD:\>=20% increase in sum of diameters of TLs, referring smallest sum on study, sum must be an absolute increase of \>=5 mm, appearance of \>=1 new lesions;unequivocal progression of existing non TLs.

Time frame: Day 28 of Cycle 1, Cycle 2 then every 8 weeks until disease progression (up to 48 months)

Population: ITT Population included all randomized participants, with study treatment assignment designated according to initial randomization, regardless of whether participants received study treatment or a different treatment from that to which they were randomized.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
DacomitinibNumber of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) Based on IRC ReviewComplete response12 Participants
DacomitinibNumber of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) Based on IRC ReviewProgressive disease12 Participants
DacomitinibNumber of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) Based on IRC ReviewStable disease30 Participants
DacomitinibNumber of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) Based on IRC ReviewIndeterminate15 Participants
DacomitinibNumber of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) Based on IRC ReviewPartial response158 Participants
GefitinibNumber of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) Based on IRC ReviewIndeterminate22 Participants
GefitinibNumber of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) Based on IRC ReviewComplete response4 Participants
GefitinibNumber of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) Based on IRC ReviewPartial response157 Participants
GefitinibNumber of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) Based on IRC ReviewStable disease27 Participants
GefitinibNumber of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) Based on IRC ReviewProgressive disease15 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Vital Signs

Criteria for vital signs abnormalities: postbaseline pulse rate less than (\<) 50 beats per minute (bpm) or greater than (\>)130 bpm and maximum increase from baseline in pulse rate \>=30 bpm and maximum decrease from baseline in pulse rate \<=30 bpm. Systolic blood pressure (BP) of maximum increase from baseline (MIB) \>=40 millimeters of mercury (mmHg), maximum decrease from baseline (MDB) in systolic blood pressure =\<60 mmHg. Diastolic blood pressure of MIB \>=20 mmHg and MDB in diastolic blood pressure \>-40 and =\<-20 mm Hg. And MDB in diastolic BP\<=-40 mmHg. Only categories with at least 1 participant with abnormality are reported in this outcome measure.

Time frame: From randomization until death or last date known as alive, up to 61 months

Population: Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication, with treatment assignments designated according to actual study treatment received.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
DacomitinibNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Vital SignsMIB in diastolic BP >=20 mmHg42 Participants
DacomitinibNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Vital SignsMinimum post baseline pulse rate <50 bpm3 Participants
DacomitinibNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Vital SignsMDB in systolic BP <=-60 mmHg0 Participants
DacomitinibNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Vital SignsMIB in pulse rate >=30 bpm16 Participants
DacomitinibNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Vital SignsMDB in diastolic BP >-40 and <=-20mmHg51 Participants
DacomitinibNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Vital SignsMDB in pulse rate <=-30 bpm17 Participants
DacomitinibNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Vital SignsMIB in systolic BP >=40 mmHg16 Participants
DacomitinibNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Vital SignsMIB in body weight >=10%28 Participants
DacomitinibNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Vital SignsMDB in diastolic BP <=-40 mmHg0 Participants
DacomitinibNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Vital SignsMDB in body weight <=-10%46 Participants
DacomitinibNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Vital SignsMaximum post baseline pulse rate >130 bpm2 Participants
GefitinibNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Vital SignsMDB in body weight <=-10%32 Participants
GefitinibNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Vital SignsMIB in systolic BP >=40 mmHg22 Participants
GefitinibNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Vital SignsMDB in systolic BP <=-60 mmHg1 Participants
GefitinibNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Vital SignsMIB in diastolic BP >=20 mmHg44 Participants
GefitinibNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Vital SignsMDB in diastolic BP >-40 and <=-20mmHg53 Participants
GefitinibNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Vital SignsMaximum post baseline pulse rate >130 bpm2 Participants
GefitinibNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Vital SignsMinimum post baseline pulse rate <50 bpm0 Participants
GefitinibNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Vital SignsMIB in pulse rate >=30 bpm12 Participants
GefitinibNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Vital SignsMDB in pulse rate <=-30 bpm15 Participants
GefitinibNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Vital SignsMIB in body weight >=10%42 Participants
GefitinibNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Vital SignsMDB in diastolic BP <=-40 mmHg1 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormality in Electrocardiogram (ECG)

ECG parameters included corrected QT interval using Bazett's formula (QTcB) and corrected QT interval using Fridericia's formula (QTcF). ECG criteria for abnormality: absolute value 450 - \<480 msec, 480 - \<500 msec, \>=500msec. The number of participants with potentially clinically significant ECG findings at any visit were reported.

Time frame: From randomization until death or last date known as alive, up to 61 months

Population: Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication, with treatment assignments designated according to actual study treatment received. Here, N (number of participants analyzed) signifies participants who were evaluable for this specified outcome measure.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
DacomitinibNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormality in Electrocardiogram (ECG)QTcF Criteria: 450-<4805 Participants
DacomitinibNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormality in Electrocardiogram (ECG)QTcB Criteria: 450-<48022 Participants
DacomitinibNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormality in Electrocardiogram (ECG)QTcB Criteria: 480-<5003 Participants
GefitinibNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormality in Electrocardiogram (ECG)QTcF Criteria: 450-<4800 Participants
GefitinibNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormality in Electrocardiogram (ECG)QTcB Criteria: 450-<4800 Participants
GefitinibNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormality in Electrocardiogram (ECG)QTcB Criteria: 480-<5000 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities of Grade 3 or Higher Severity Based on NCI CTCAE Version 4.03: Biochemistry and Haematology

Parameters included anaemia, activated partial thromboplastin time, haemoglobin, international normalized ratio, lymphocyte count, lymphopenia, neutrophils (absolute), platelets, prothrombin time and white blood cells. Biochemistry parameters included alanine aminotransferase (increased), alkaline phosphatase (increased), aspartate aminotransferase (increased), bilirubin (total), creatinine (increased), hypercalcaemia, hyperglycaemia, hyperkalaemia, hypermagnesaemia, hypernatraemia, hypoalbuminaemia, hypocalcaemia, hypoglycaemia, hypokalaemia, hypomagnesaemia, hyponatraemia. Test abnormalities were graded by AEs according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events(NCI CTCAE) version 4.03 as Grade 1=mild; Grade 2=moderate; Grade 3=severe; Grade 4=life-threatening; Grade 5=death related to AE. Only categories with at least 1 participant with abnormality are reported in this outcome measure.

Time frame: From randomization until death or last date known as alive, up to 61 months

Population: Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication, with treatment assignments designated according to actual study treatment received.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
DacomitinibNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities of Grade 3 or Higher Severity Based on NCI CTCAE Version 4.03: Biochemistry and HaematologyAlanine aminotransferase increased (Grade 4)0 Participants
DacomitinibNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities of Grade 3 or Higher Severity Based on NCI CTCAE Version 4.03: Biochemistry and HaematologyHyperglycemia (Grade 3)2 Participants
DacomitinibNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities of Grade 3 or Higher Severity Based on NCI CTCAE Version 4.03: Biochemistry and HaematologyNeutrophil count (absolute) (Grade 3)0 Participants
DacomitinibNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities of Grade 3 or Higher Severity Based on NCI CTCAE Version 4.03: Biochemistry and HaematologyHyperkalemia (Grade 3)0 Participants
DacomitinibNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities of Grade 3 or Higher Severity Based on NCI CTCAE Version 4.03: Biochemistry and HaematologyAspartate aminotransferase increased (Grade 3)2 Participants
DacomitinibNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities of Grade 3 or Higher Severity Based on NCI CTCAE Version 4.03: Biochemistry and HaematologyHyperkalemia (Grade 4)0 Participants
DacomitinibNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities of Grade 3 or Higher Severity Based on NCI CTCAE Version 4.03: Biochemistry and HaematologyAnaemia (Grade 3)5 Participants
DacomitinibNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities of Grade 3 or Higher Severity Based on NCI CTCAE Version 4.03: Biochemistry and HaematologyHypermagnesemia (Grade 3)9 Participants
DacomitinibNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities of Grade 3 or Higher Severity Based on NCI CTCAE Version 4.03: Biochemistry and HaematologyAspartate aminotransferase increased (Grade 4)0 Participants
DacomitinibNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities of Grade 3 or Higher Severity Based on NCI CTCAE Version 4.03: Biochemistry and HaematologyHypocalcemia (Grade 3)3 Participants
DacomitinibNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities of Grade 3 or Higher Severity Based on NCI CTCAE Version 4.03: Biochemistry and HaematologyWBC count (Grade 3)1 Participants
DacomitinibNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities of Grade 3 or Higher Severity Based on NCI CTCAE Version 4.03: Biochemistry and HaematologyHypoglycemia (Grade 3)0 Participants
DacomitinibNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities of Grade 3 or Higher Severity Based on NCI CTCAE Version 4.03: Biochemistry and HaematologyAlkaline phosphatase increased (Grade 3)2 Participants
DacomitinibNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities of Grade 3 or Higher Severity Based on NCI CTCAE Version 4.03: Biochemistry and HaematologyHypoglycemia (Grade 4)1 Participants
DacomitinibNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities of Grade 3 or Higher Severity Based on NCI CTCAE Version 4.03: Biochemistry and HaematologyLymphopenia (Grade 3)13 Participants
DacomitinibNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities of Grade 3 or Higher Severity Based on NCI CTCAE Version 4.03: Biochemistry and HaematologyHypokalemia (Grade 3)13 Participants
DacomitinibNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities of Grade 3 or Higher Severity Based on NCI CTCAE Version 4.03: Biochemistry and HaematologyBilirubin increased (total) (Grade 3)1 Participants
DacomitinibNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities of Grade 3 or Higher Severity Based on NCI CTCAE Version 4.03: Biochemistry and HaematologyHypokalemia (Grade 4)2 Participants
DacomitinibNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities of Grade 3 or Higher Severity Based on NCI CTCAE Version 4.03: Biochemistry and HaematologyAlanine aminotransferase increased (Grade 3)5 Participants
DacomitinibNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities of Grade 3 or Higher Severity Based on NCI CTCAE Version 4.03: Biochemistry and HaematologyHypomagnesemia (Grade 3)2 Participants
DacomitinibNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities of Grade 3 or Higher Severity Based on NCI CTCAE Version 4.03: Biochemistry and HaematologyCreatinine increased (Grade 3)1 Participants
DacomitinibNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities of Grade 3 or Higher Severity Based on NCI CTCAE Version 4.03: Biochemistry and HaematologyHyponatremia (Grade 3)5 Participants
DacomitinibNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities of Grade 3 or Higher Severity Based on NCI CTCAE Version 4.03: Biochemistry and HaematologyHaemoglobin increased(Grade 3)0 Participants
DacomitinibNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities of Grade 3 or Higher Severity Based on NCI CTCAE Version 4.03: Biochemistry and HaematologyHyponatremia (Grade 4)1 Participants
DacomitinibNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities of Grade 3 or Higher Severity Based on NCI CTCAE Version 4.03: Biochemistry and HaematologyHypercalcemia (Grade 3)1 Participants
GefitinibNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities of Grade 3 or Higher Severity Based on NCI CTCAE Version 4.03: Biochemistry and HaematologyHyponatremia (Grade 4)1 Participants
GefitinibNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities of Grade 3 or Higher Severity Based on NCI CTCAE Version 4.03: Biochemistry and HaematologyAnaemia (Grade 3)6 Participants
GefitinibNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities of Grade 3 or Higher Severity Based on NCI CTCAE Version 4.03: Biochemistry and HaematologyHaemoglobin increased(Grade 3)1 Participants
GefitinibNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities of Grade 3 or Higher Severity Based on NCI CTCAE Version 4.03: Biochemistry and HaematologyLymphopenia (Grade 3)6 Participants
GefitinibNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities of Grade 3 or Higher Severity Based on NCI CTCAE Version 4.03: Biochemistry and HaematologyNeutrophil count (absolute) (Grade 3)2 Participants
GefitinibNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities of Grade 3 or Higher Severity Based on NCI CTCAE Version 4.03: Biochemistry and HaematologyWBC count (Grade 3)1 Participants
GefitinibNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities of Grade 3 or Higher Severity Based on NCI CTCAE Version 4.03: Biochemistry and HaematologyAlanine aminotransferase increased (Grade 3)26 Participants
GefitinibNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities of Grade 3 or Higher Severity Based on NCI CTCAE Version 4.03: Biochemistry and HaematologyAlanine aminotransferase increased (Grade 4)3 Participants
GefitinibNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities of Grade 3 or Higher Severity Based on NCI CTCAE Version 4.03: Biochemistry and HaematologyAspartate aminotransferase increased (Grade 3)15 Participants
GefitinibNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities of Grade 3 or Higher Severity Based on NCI CTCAE Version 4.03: Biochemistry and HaematologyAspartate aminotransferase increased (Grade 4)3 Participants
GefitinibNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities of Grade 3 or Higher Severity Based on NCI CTCAE Version 4.03: Biochemistry and HaematologyAlkaline phosphatase increased (Grade 3)5 Participants
GefitinibNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities of Grade 3 or Higher Severity Based on NCI CTCAE Version 4.03: Biochemistry and HaematologyBilirubin increased (total) (Grade 3)1 Participants
GefitinibNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities of Grade 3 or Higher Severity Based on NCI CTCAE Version 4.03: Biochemistry and HaematologyCreatinine increased (Grade 3)1 Participants
GefitinibNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities of Grade 3 or Higher Severity Based on NCI CTCAE Version 4.03: Biochemistry and HaematologyHypercalcemia (Grade 3)0 Participants
GefitinibNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities of Grade 3 or Higher Severity Based on NCI CTCAE Version 4.03: Biochemistry and HaematologyHyperglycemia (Grade 3)5 Participants
GefitinibNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities of Grade 3 or Higher Severity Based on NCI CTCAE Version 4.03: Biochemistry and HaematologyHyperkalemia (Grade 3)1 Participants
GefitinibNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities of Grade 3 or Higher Severity Based on NCI CTCAE Version 4.03: Biochemistry and HaematologyHyperkalemia (Grade 4)2 Participants
GefitinibNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities of Grade 3 or Higher Severity Based on NCI CTCAE Version 4.03: Biochemistry and HaematologyHypermagnesemia (Grade 3)7 Participants
GefitinibNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities of Grade 3 or Higher Severity Based on NCI CTCAE Version 4.03: Biochemistry and HaematologyHypocalcemia (Grade 3)4 Participants
GefitinibNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities of Grade 3 or Higher Severity Based on NCI CTCAE Version 4.03: Biochemistry and HaematologyHypoglycemia (Grade 3)2 Participants
GefitinibNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities of Grade 3 or Higher Severity Based on NCI CTCAE Version 4.03: Biochemistry and HaematologyHypoglycemia (Grade 4)0 Participants
GefitinibNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities of Grade 3 or Higher Severity Based on NCI CTCAE Version 4.03: Biochemistry and HaematologyHypokalemia (Grade 3)5 Participants
GefitinibNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities of Grade 3 or Higher Severity Based on NCI CTCAE Version 4.03: Biochemistry and HaematologyHypokalemia (Grade 4)0 Participants
GefitinibNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities of Grade 3 or Higher Severity Based on NCI CTCAE Version 4.03: Biochemistry and HaematologyHypomagnesemia (Grade 3)0 Participants
GefitinibNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities of Grade 3 or Higher Severity Based on NCI CTCAE Version 4.03: Biochemistry and HaematologyHyponatremia (Grade 3)4 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities: Urinalysis

Urinalysis parameter included urine protein, urine blood/haemoglobin, urine glucose and urine sediment. Test abnormalities was defined as deviation from normal range (higher or lower). Normal range of 24-hour urine protein test: less than 150 mg of protein per day, urine glucose: 0 to 0.8 mmol/L (millimole per liter), urine protein: 0 to 20 mg/dL (milligrams per deciliter). Urine blood/haemoglobin abnormality was defined as presence and absence of blood/haemoglobin in urine of participants. Urine sediment abnormality was defined as the presence of any bacteria, casts, crystals, and epithelial cells. Only categories with at least 1 participant with abnormality are reported in this outcome measure.

Time frame: From randomization until death or last date known as alive, up to 61 months

Population: Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication, with treatment assignments designated according to actual study treatment received.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
DacomitinibNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities: UrinalysisHigh Urine Protein1 Participants
DacomitinibNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities: UrinalysisLow Urine Glucose1 Participants
DacomitinibNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities: UrinalysisHigh Urine Blood/Haemoglobin4 Participants
GefitinibNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities: UrinalysisLow Urine Glucose0 Participants
GefitinibNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities: UrinalysisHigh Urine Protein1 Participants
GefitinibNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities: UrinalysisHigh Urine Blood/Haemoglobin4 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Maximum Relative Decrease From Baseline >20% in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF)

An ejection fraction (EF) was the volumetric fraction of blood ejected from a ventricle of the heart with each heartbeat; it was a measure of the pumping efficiency of the heart. The EF of the left heart, known as the left ventricular ejection fraction, was a measure of the efficiency of pumping into the body's systemic circulation.

Time frame: From baseline up to 7 days of Cycle 4 (up to 91 days)

Population: Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication, with treatment assignments designated according to actual study treatment received. Here N signifies number of participants who were evaluable for this specified outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
DacomitinibNumber of Participants With Maximum Relative Decrease From Baseline >20% in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF)5 Participants
GefitinibNumber of Participants With Maximum Relative Decrease From Baseline >20% in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF)5 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)

An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship.AEs included both serious and non- serious adverse events. An SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. Treatment-emergent AEs were events between first dose of study drug and up to 28-35 days after last dose that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pretreatment state.

Time frame: From randomization until death or last date known as alive, up to 91 months

Population: Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication, with treatment assignments designated according to actual study treatment received.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
DacomitinibNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)TEAEs226 Participants
DacomitinibNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)SAEs69 Participants
GefitinibNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)TEAEs220 Participants
GefitinibNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)SAEs53 Participants
Dacomitinib (Ongoing at DCO)Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)TEAEs11 Participants
Dacomitinib (Ongoing at DCO)Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)SAEs4 Participants
Secondary

Objective Response Rate (ORR) Based on Investigator Assessment

Percentage of participants with a BOR of either CR or PR based on investigator assessment recorded from the start of treatment until disease progression based on RECIST v1.1. CR: disappearance of all target lesions (TLs), non TLs; any pathological lymph nodes (LN) must reduce in short axis to \<10 mm; normalization of tumour marker level, for non TL all LN must be non-pathological in size (\<10 mm short axis); PR:\>=30% decrease in sum of diameters of TLs, referring baseline sum diameters. PD:\>=20% increase in sum of diameters of TLs, referring smallest sum on study, sum must be an absolute increase of \>=5 mm, appearance of \>=1 new lesions; unequivocal progression of existing non TLs.

Time frame: Day 28 of Cycle 1, Cycle 2 then every 8 weeks until disease progression (up to 48 months)

Population: ITT Population included all randomized participants, with study treatment assignment designated according to initial randomization, regardless of whether participants received study treatment or a different treatment from that to which they were randomized.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
DacomitinibObjective Response Rate (ORR) Based on Investigator Assessment75.3 percentage of participants
GefitinibObjective Response Rate (ORR) Based on Investigator Assessment70.2 percentage of participants
p-value: 0.0924Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

Objective Response Rate (ORR) Based on IRC Review

Percentage of participants with a BOR of either CR or PR based on IRC review recorded from the start of treatment until disease progression based on RECIST v1.1. CR: disappearance of all target lesions (TLs), non TLs; any pathological lymph nodes (LN) must reduce in short axis to \<10 mm; normalization of tumour marker level, for non TL all LN must be non-pathological in size (\<10 mm short axis); PR:\>=30% decrease in sum of diameters of TLs, referring baseline sum diameters. PD:\>=20% increase in sum of diameters of TLs, referring smallest sum on study, sum must be an absolute increase of \>=5 mm, appearance of \>=1 new lesions; unequivocal progression of existing non TLs.

Time frame: Day 28 of Cycle 1, Cycle 2 then every 8 weeks until disease progression (up to 48 months)

Population: ITT Population included all randomized participants, with study treatment assignment designated according to initial randomization, regardless of whether participants received study treatment or a different treatment from that to which they were randomized.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
DacomitinibObjective Response Rate (ORR) Based on IRC Review74.9 percentage of participants
GefitinibObjective Response Rate (ORR) Based on IRC Review71.6 percentage of participants
p-value: 0.1942Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

OS at 30 Months (OS30m)

OS30m was defined as the probability of a participant being alive at 30 months from date of randomization.

Time frame: Up to 30 months from date of randomization

Population: ITT Population included all randomized participants, with study treatment assignment designated according to initial randomization, regardless of whether participants received study treatment or a different treatment from that to which they were randomized.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
DacomitinibOS at 30 Months (OS30m)56.4 probability of survival
GefitinibOS at 30 Months (OS30m)45.7 probability of survival
Secondary

Overall Mean Scores of Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension Visual Analog Scale (EQ-5D VAS)

The Euro Quality of Life-5 dimension (EQ-5D) is a brief self-administered, validated reliable generic health status instrument. EQ-5D general health status can also be measured by a visual analog scale (EQ-5D VAS). EQ-5D VAS measures the participant's self-rated health status on a scale from 0 (worst imaginable health state) to 100 (best imaginable health state).

Time frame: From Cycle 1 Day 1 up to 48 months

Population: PRO analysis set included all enrolled participants, who started treatment and completed a baseline PRO assessments and at least one post-baseline PRO assessment after the first dose. Here N signifies number of participants who were evaluable for this specified outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
DacomitinibOverall Mean Scores of Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension Visual Analog Scale (EQ-5D VAS)73.3869 units on a scale
GefitinibOverall Mean Scores of Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension Visual Analog Scale (EQ-5D VAS)77.6923 units on a scale
Secondary

Overall Survival (OS)

OS was defined as the time from randomization to the date of death for any cause. In the absence of confirmation of death, survival time was censored at the last date the participant was known to be alive. OS (month)=\[death date or last known alive date - randomization date + 1\]/30.4375.

Time frame: From randomization until death or last date known as alive, up to 45 months

Population: ITT Population included all randomized participants, with study treatment assignment designated according to initial randomization, regardless of whether participants received study treatment or a different treatment from that to which they were randomized.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
DacomitinibOverall Survival (OS)34.1 months
GefitinibOverall Survival (OS)27.0 months
p-value: 0.007795% CI: [0.591, 0.947]1-sided stratified log-rank test
Secondary

Pre-dose Plasma Concentrations (Ctrough) of Dacomitinib and Its Metabolite PF-05199265

Trough plasma concentration was defined as the measured concentration at the end of a dosing interval at steady state (taken directly before next administration).

Time frame: Pre-dose on Day 1 of Cycle 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6

Population: PK analysis set included all participants who were treated with dacomitinib with at least one measured plasma concentration and were dose-compliant. Dose-compliant participants were those who received 45 mg dacomitinib daily without interruptions or dose reductions for at least 14 days prior to the day of data collection. Here, 'Number Analyzed' = participants evaluable for this outcome measure at specified time points.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
DacomitinibPre-dose Plasma Concentrations (Ctrough) of Dacomitinib and Its Metabolite PF-05199265Cycle 5 Day 1: PF-0519926512.48 ng/mLStandard Deviation 6.69
DacomitinibPre-dose Plasma Concentrations (Ctrough) of Dacomitinib and Its Metabolite PF-05199265Cycle 3 Day 1: PF-0519926514.42 ng/mLStandard Deviation 9.1
DacomitinibPre-dose Plasma Concentrations (Ctrough) of Dacomitinib and Its Metabolite PF-05199265Cycle 2 Day 1: Dacomitinib70.24 ng/mLStandard Deviation 27.16
DacomitinibPre-dose Plasma Concentrations (Ctrough) of Dacomitinib and Its Metabolite PF-05199265Cycle 3 Day 1: Dacomitinib68.34 ng/mLStandard Deviation 25.8
DacomitinibPre-dose Plasma Concentrations (Ctrough) of Dacomitinib and Its Metabolite PF-05199265Cycle 4 Day 1: Dacomitinib68.16 ng/mLStandard Deviation 25.49
DacomitinibPre-dose Plasma Concentrations (Ctrough) of Dacomitinib and Its Metabolite PF-05199265Cycle 5 Day 1: Dacomitinib64.50 ng/mLStandard Deviation 25.52
DacomitinibPre-dose Plasma Concentrations (Ctrough) of Dacomitinib and Its Metabolite PF-05199265Cycle 6 Day 1: Dacomitinib61.68 ng/mLStandard Deviation 22.58
DacomitinibPre-dose Plasma Concentrations (Ctrough) of Dacomitinib and Its Metabolite PF-05199265Cycle 2 Day 1: PF-0519926513.20 ng/mLStandard Deviation 8.55
DacomitinibPre-dose Plasma Concentrations (Ctrough) of Dacomitinib and Its Metabolite PF-05199265Cycle 4 Day 1: PF-0519926513.70 ng/mLStandard Deviation 8.33
DacomitinibPre-dose Plasma Concentrations (Ctrough) of Dacomitinib and Its Metabolite PF-05199265Cycle 6 Day 1: PF-0519926513.05 ng/mLStandard Deviation 6.52
Secondary

Progression Free Survival (PFS) Based on Investigator Assessment

PFS: time from randomization to date of PD as determined by investigator assessment as per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) v1.1 criteria or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. PD for target lesions: 20% increase in sum of diameters of target measurable lesions above smallest sum observed, with minimum absolute increase of 5 mm; for non-target lesions: unequivocal progression of pre-existing lesions. Overall tumor burden increased sufficiently to merit discontinuation of therapy. In presence of stable disease (did not achieve partial response, complete response or PD) or partial response (\>=30% decrease under baseline of sum of diameters of all target measurable lesions, short diameter used in the sum for target nodes, longest diameter used in sum for all other target lesions) in target disease; for new lesions: appearance of any new unequivocal malignant lesion indicated PD.

Time frame: Day 28 of Cycle 1, Cycle 2 then every 8 weeks until disease progression or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first (up to 48 months)

Population: ITT Population included all randomized participants, with study treatment assignment designated according to initial randomization, regardless of whether participants received study treatment or a different treatment from that to which they were randomized.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
DacomitinibProgression Free Survival (PFS) Based on Investigator Assessment16.6 months
GefitinibProgression Free Survival (PFS) Based on Investigator Assessment11.0 months
p-value: <0.000195% CI: [0.497, 0.779]1-sided stratified log-rank test
Secondary

Time to Reach Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of Dacomitinib and Its Metabolite PF-05199265

Tmax was defined as time to first occurrence of Cmax and can be observed directly from data as time of first occurrence.

Time frame: Pre-dose and 2, 4, 6, 8, and 24 hours post-dose (sample collection time points had window of +/- 10% of nominal time) on Cycle 2 Day 1 (Day 29)

Population: PK analysis set included all participants who were treated with dacomitinib with at least 1 measured plasma concentration and were dose-compliant (who received 45 mg dacomitinib daily without interruptions/dose reductions for at least 14 days prior to day of data collection). This outcome measure was planned to be analyzed in Chinese subgroup only.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
DacomitinibTime to Reach Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of Dacomitinib and Its Metabolite PF-05199265Dacomitinib4.03 hour
DacomitinibTime to Reach Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of Dacomitinib and Its Metabolite PF-05199265PF-051992656.0 hour

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 14, 2026