Skip to content

Rectal Indomethacin to Prevent Post-Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) Pancreatitis

Rectal Indomethacin to Prevent Post-ERCP Pancreatitis

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01774604
Enrollment
449
Registered
2013-01-24
Start date
2013-01-31
Completion date
2014-12-31
Last updated
2016-11-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Post-ERCP Acute Pancreatitis

Keywords

Post ERCP acute pancreatitis, Post Fine Needle Aspiration (FNA) acute pancreatitis, Indomethacin, Rectal Non Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs (NSAIDs)

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to assess whether peri-procedural administration of rectal indomethacin, compared to placebo, can reduce the incidence of post-ERCP pancreatitis.

Interventions

DRUGIndomethacin

100 mg Indomethacin PR x 1

DRUGPlacebo

Sponsors

Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Scheduled for an ERCP at Dartmouth-Hitchcock 2. Age greater than 18 years old 3. Ability to provide written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

1. Inability to provide written informed consent 2. ERCP being performed for diagnosis and/or treatment of acute pancreatitis 3. Current ongoing acute pancreatitis 4. Previously documented allergy to Non-Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs (NSAIDs) 5. Contra-indication to NSAID therapy (creatinine level \>1.4 or active peptic ulcer disease), already taking NSAIDs (other than aspirin therapy for cardioprotection) 6. Pregnant or nursing mothers

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Patients Who Developed Acute PancreatitisFrom randomization to 30 days after ERCPNumber of patients who developed pancreatitis following ERCP based on Atlanta Classification

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Patients Who Developed Moderately Severe PancreatitisFrom randomization to 30 days after ERCPNumber of patients with moderately severe pancreatitis based on Atlanta Classification
Number of Patients Who Developed Mild PancreatitisFrom randomization to 30 days after ERCPNumber of patient who developed mild acute pancreatitis based on the Atlanta Classification
Number of Patients Who Developed Severe PancreatitisFrom randomization to 30 days after ERCPNumber of patients with severe acute pancreatitis based on the Atlanta Classification
Number of Patient DeathsFrom randomization to 30 days after ERCPNumber of patients who died from any cause from the time of ERCP until 30 days post-procedure
Number of Patients With 30 Days Hospital Re-admissionFrom randomization until 30 days after ERCPNumber of patients admitted to the hospital for any cause following ERCP
Number of Patients Who Developed Gastrointestinal BleedingFrom randomization to 30 days after ERCPNumber of patients who developed any type of gastrointestinal bleeding from time of ERCP to 30 days post procedure

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

All patients who presented to Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center for Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) for any reason between March 2013 and December 2014

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Indomethacin
Indomethacin 100 mg PR x 1 in peri-procedural period Indomethacin: 100 mg Indomethacin PR x 1
223
Placebo
Placebo suppositories (#2) Placebo
226
Total449

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPlaceboIndomethacinTotal
Age, Continuous64.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.1
64.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 23.7
64.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 19.9
Balloon Dilation of Biliary Sphincter
No
206 participants202 participants408 participants
Balloon Dilation of Biliary Sphincter
Yes
20 participants21 participants41 participants
Biliary Strent Placement
No
142 participants134 participants276 participants
Biliary Strent Placement
Yes
84 participants89 participants173 participants
Concomitant Endoscopic Ultrasound with Fine Needle Aspiration (EUS/FNA)
No
186 participants182 participants368 participants
Concomitant Endoscopic Ultrasound with Fine Needle Aspiration (EUS/FNA)
Yes
40 participants41 participants81 participants
Difficult Cannulation
No
184 participants177 participants361 participants
Difficult Cannulation
Yes
42 participants46 participants88 participants
History of post-ERCP Pancreatitis
No
217 participants214 participants431 participants
History of post-ERCP Pancreatitis
Yes
9 participants9 participants18 participants
History of Previous Sphincterotomy
No
155 participants151 participants306 participants
History of Previous Sphincterotomy
Yes
71 participants72 participants143 participants
Indication
Acute Cholangitis
13 participants12 participants25 participants
Indication
Ampullectomy
5 participants6 participants11 participants
Indication
Biliary Leak
12 participants11 participants23 participants
Indication
Biliary Stent Change
25 participants25 participants50 participants
Indication
Choledocholithiasis
52 participants59 participants111 participants
Indication
Increased Liver Tests/Jaundice
9 participants13 participants22 participants
Indication
Malignant Biliary Obstruction
50 participants53 participants103 participants
Indication
Other
31 participants16 participants47 participants
Indication
Pancreatic Duct Stone
2 participants3 participants5 participants
Indication
Pancreatic Leak/Disruption
12 participants11 participants23 participants
Indication
Pancreatic Stricture
5 participants3 participants8 participants
Indication
Recurrent Acute Pancreatitis
2 participants5 participants7 participants
Indication
Suspected Sphincter of Oddi Dysfunction (SOD)
8 participants6 participants14 participants
Minor Duct Sphincterotomy
No
222 participants218 participants440 participants
Minor Duct Sphincterotomy
Yes
4 participants5 participants9 participants
Pancreatic Acinarization
No
222 participants218 participants440 participants
Pancreatic Acinarization
Yes
4 participants5 participants9 participants
Pancreatic Stent Placement
No
191 participants187 participants378 participants
Pancreatic Stent Placement
Yes
35 participants36 participants71 participants
Pancreatography
No
177 participants173 participants350 participants
Pancreatography
Yes
49 participants50 participants99 participants
Periprocedural Fluid Volume703 Milliliters
STANDARD_DEVIATION 355
705 Milliliters
STANDARD_DEVIATION 335
704 Milliliters
STANDARD_DEVIATION 345
Precut Biliary Sphincterotomy
No
210 participants212 participants422 participants
Precut Biliary Sphincterotomy
Yes
16 participants11 participants27 participants
Previous ERCP
No
147 participants142 participants289 participants
Previous ERCP
Yes
79 participants81 participants160 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
118 Participants118 Participants236 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
108 Participants105 Participants213 Participants
Therapeutic Biliary Sphincterotomy
No
112 participants117 participants229 participants
Therapeutic Biliary Sphincterotomy
Yes
114 participants106 participants220 participants
Therapeutic Pancreatic Sphincterotomy
No
221 participants211 participants432 participants
Therapeutic Pancreatic Sphincterotomy
Yes
5 participants12 participants17 participants
Trainee Involvement
No
58 participants71 participants129 participants
Trainee Involvement
Yes
168 participants152 participants320 participants
Wire Cannulation of Pancreatic Duct
No
137 participants133 participants270 participants
Wire Cannulation of Pancreatic Duct
Yes
89 participants90 participants179 participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
4 / 2236 / 226
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 2233 / 226

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Patients Who Developed Acute Pancreatitis

Number of patients who developed pancreatitis following ERCP based on Atlanta Classification

Time frame: From randomization to 30 days after ERCP

Population: Patient who randomized into the study and received either rectal indomethacin or placebo

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
IndomethacinNumber of Patients Who Developed Acute Pancreatitis16 participants
PlaceboNumber of Patients Who Developed Acute Pancreatitis11 participants
p-value: 0.33Fisher Exact
Secondary

Number of Patient Deaths

Number of patients who died from any cause from the time of ERCP until 30 days post-procedure

Time frame: From randomization to 30 days after ERCP

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
IndomethacinNumber of Patient Deaths0 participants
PlaceboNumber of Patient Deaths3 participants
p-value: 0.25Fisher Exact
Secondary

Number of Patients Who Developed Gastrointestinal Bleeding

Number of patients who developed any type of gastrointestinal bleeding from time of ERCP to 30 days post procedure

Time frame: From randomization to 30 days after ERCP

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
IndomethacinNumber of Patients Who Developed Gastrointestinal Bleeding4 participants
PlaceboNumber of Patients Who Developed Gastrointestinal Bleeding6 participants
p-value: 0.75Fisher Exact
Secondary

Number of Patients Who Developed Mild Pancreatitis

Number of patient who developed mild acute pancreatitis based on the Atlanta Classification

Time frame: From randomization to 30 days after ERCP

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
IndomethacinNumber of Patients Who Developed Mild Pancreatitis16 participants
PlaceboNumber of Patients Who Developed Mild Pancreatitis9 participants
p-value: 0.15Fisher Exact
Secondary

Number of Patients Who Developed Moderately Severe Pancreatitis

Number of patients with moderately severe pancreatitis based on Atlanta Classification

Time frame: From randomization to 30 days after ERCP

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
IndomethacinNumber of Patients Who Developed Moderately Severe Pancreatitis0 participants
PlaceboNumber of Patients Who Developed Moderately Severe Pancreatitis1 participants
p-value: 1Fisher Exact
Secondary

Number of Patients Who Developed Severe Pancreatitis

Number of patients with severe acute pancreatitis based on the Atlanta Classification

Time frame: From randomization to 30 days after ERCP

Population: Assess the number of patients who developed severe acute pancreatitis

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
IndomethacinNumber of Patients Who Developed Severe Pancreatitis0 participants
PlaceboNumber of Patients Who Developed Severe Pancreatitis1 participants
p-value: 1Fisher Exact
Secondary

Number of Patients With 30 Days Hospital Re-admission

Number of patients admitted to the hospital for any cause following ERCP

Time frame: From randomization until 30 days after ERCP

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
IndomethacinNumber of Patients With 30 Days Hospital Re-admission31 participants
PlaceboNumber of Patients With 30 Days Hospital Re-admission20 participants
p-value: 0.1Fisher Exact

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 14, 2026