Skip to content

Adjuvant Acupuncture for Severe Head Injury

Adjuvant Acupuncture Therapy in Patients With Severe Head Injury: a Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01773291
Enrollment
24
Registered
2013-01-23
Start date
2013-01-31
Completion date
2015-07-31
Last updated
2016-01-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Head Injury

Keywords

Acupuncture; laser acupuncture; traumatic brain injury

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to determine the therapeutic effect of acupuncture on severe head injury under conventional treatment. A double-blind clinical trial is conducted up to 6 weeks and the change of subjects' Glasgow coma scale (GCS) and muscle power is measured.

Detailed description

Objective: To investigate the therapeutic effect of acupuncture on severe head injury under conventional treatment. Methods: 90 subjects aged 12 to 70 years with severe head injury (Glasgow coma scale score 8 or less) are randomly divided into acupuncture, laser acupuncture and control group. We use restoring consciousness acupuncture (GV26 and 12 Well points) to treat the subjects 3 sessions per week under conventional treatment at Department of Neurosurgery. A double-blind clinical trial is conducted up to 6 weeks and the change of subjects' GCS and muscle power is measured.

Interventions

OTHERacupuncture

acupuncture on GV26 and 12 Well points

OTHERlaser acupuncture

laser acupuncture on GV26 and 12 Well points

OTHERcontrol

sham laser acupuncture

Sponsors

Chang Gung Memorial Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
12 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* subjects aged 12 to 70 years with severe head injury (Glasgow coma scale score 8 or less) * with informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* dilated pupils without light reflex * serious complications during therapeutic course * interruption of therapeutic course * unfavored condition assessed by physician in charge * without informed consent

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS)6 weeksEye response (E) There are four grades starting with the most severe: 1. No eye opening 2. Eye opening in response to pain stimulus. 3. Eye opening to speech. 4. Eyes opening spontaneously Verbal response (V) There are five grades starting with the most severe: 1. No verbal response 2. Incomprehensible sounds. 3. Inappropriate words. 4. Confused. 5. Oriented. Motor response (M) There are six grades: 1. No motor response 2. Decerebrate posturing accentuated by pain 3. Decorticate posturing accentuated by pain 4. Withdrawal from pain 5. Localizes to pain 6. Obeys commands The sum of the score was measured (3 - 15) before and after treatment during hospitalization. The higher score, the better outcome.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Muscle Power (MP)6 weeksMedical Research Council (MRC) muscle-grading scale Grade MRC grade of muscle strength 0 No movement 1. Flicker of movement only 2. Movement possible when assisted by gravity or gravity is eliminated 3. Movement possible against gravity but without imposed resistance 4. Weak movement possible against gravity 5. Normal movement against gravity and against imposed resistance The 4 muscle groups were assessed on the 0 to 5 scale and scores were summed before and after treatment during hospitalization. The total score ranges from 0-20, with higher score indicating better outcome.

Countries

Taiwan

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Patients with severe traumatic brain injury (Glasgow Coma Scale, GCS ≤ 8) admitted to neurosurgical intensive care unit (NSICU) were enrolled and randomly divided into three groups sequentially.

Pre-assignment details

Exclusion criteria: dilated pupils without light reflex, unstable vital signs, serious complication during therapeutic course, serious multiple injuries, withdrawal by subject, physician decision, without informed consent.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Acupuncture
acupuncture on GV26 and 12 Well points acupuncture: acupuncture on GV26 and 12 Well points
7
Laser Acupuncture
laser acupuncture on GV26 and 12 Well points laser acupuncture: laser acupuncture on GV26 and 12 Well points
9
Control Group
laser acupuncture without laser output in control group. control: sham laser acupuncture
6
Total22

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002
Overall StudyProtocol Violation100
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject001

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicAcupunctureLaser AcupunctureControl GroupTotal
Age, Continuous40.29 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 17.14
49.11 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.86
47.17 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 21.47
45.77 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 17.82
Region of Enrollment
Taiwan
7 participants9 participants6 participants22 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
1 Participants2 Participants2 Participants5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
6 Participants7 Participants4 Participants17 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 70 / 90 / 6
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 70 / 90 / 6

Outcome results

Primary

Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS)

Eye response (E) There are four grades starting with the most severe: 1. No eye opening 2. Eye opening in response to pain stimulus. 3. Eye opening to speech. 4. Eyes opening spontaneously Verbal response (V) There are five grades starting with the most severe: 1. No verbal response 2. Incomprehensible sounds. 3. Inappropriate words. 4. Confused. 5. Oriented. Motor response (M) There are six grades: 1. No motor response 2. Decerebrate posturing accentuated by pain 3. Decorticate posturing accentuated by pain 4. Withdrawal from pain 5. Localizes to pain 6. Obeys commands The sum of the score was measured (3 - 15) before and after treatment during hospitalization. The higher score, the better outcome.

Time frame: 6 weeks

Population: The subjects were treated 3 times a week (maximum 18 sessions in 6 weeks). The GCS was measured before and after treatment during hospitalization.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
AcupunctureGlasgow Coma Scale (GCS)3.14 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.46
Laser AcupunctureGlasgow Coma Scale (GCS)3.11 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.02
Control GroupGlasgow Coma Scale (GCS)4.67 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.73
Secondary

Muscle Power (MP)

Medical Research Council (MRC) muscle-grading scale Grade MRC grade of muscle strength 0 No movement 1. Flicker of movement only 2. Movement possible when assisted by gravity or gravity is eliminated 3. Movement possible against gravity but without imposed resistance 4. Weak movement possible against gravity 5. Normal movement against gravity and against imposed resistance The 4 muscle groups were assessed on the 0 to 5 scale and scores were summed before and after treatment during hospitalization. The total score ranges from 0-20, with higher score indicating better outcome.

Time frame: 6 weeks

Population: The subjects were treated 3 times a week (maximum 18 sessions in 6 weeks). The MP was measured before and after treatment during hospitalization.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
AcupunctureMuscle Power (MP)4.29 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.46
Laser AcupunctureMuscle Power (MP)4.33 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.39
Control GroupMuscle Power (MP)2.83 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.49

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026