Skip to content

Effects of 'NHGDoc' on Quality of Care

Effects of the Computerized Decision Support System 'NHGDoc' on Quality of Care: a Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01773057
Acronym
NHGDoc
Enrollment
120
Registered
2013-01-23
Start date
2013-04-30
Completion date
2017-09-30
Last updated
2018-04-12

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Heart Failure

Keywords

Computerized Decision Support System, Heart failure, Effects on quality of care, Process of care, Patient outcomes

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to determine whether the computerized decision support system 'NHGDoc' is effective in improving quality of primary care in terms of processes of care (e.g. prescribing behavior of physicians) as well as outcomes of care (e.g. hospital admissions, mortality).

Detailed description

Computerized decision support systems are regarded as useful tools to improve quality of care, but their effects are still uncertain. In the Netherlands 'NHGDoc' a computerized decision support system supported by the Dutch College of General Practitioners (NHG) is currently being implemented among more than 1.000 general practices in the Netherlands. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effects of NHGDoc on quality of care. In addition, we want to gain insight into the barriers and facilitators that affect the systems' impact. A cluster randomized controlled trial will be conducted among 120 general practices in the Netherlands. Eligible practices will be randomized to receive either the regular NHGDoc modules (control arm) or the regular modules and an additional module on heart failure (intervention arm). The effect evaluation will focus on processes of care (e.g. prescription behavior) as well as on patient outcomes (e.g. hospital admissions, mortality). Additionally, a process evaluation will be conducted, which includes a focus group study and a survey among participating healthcare providers to evaluate the perceived barriers and facilitators to using 'NHGDoc'. Results of this study will provide insight in the ability of computerized decision support systems and in particular 'NHGDoc' to improve quality of primary care. Whereas the trial focuses on a specific NHGDoc domain - heart failure - we believe our conclusions are relevant to other primary care areas as well, particularly as this study also explores the factors that contribute to the systems' effectiveness.

Interventions

OTHERNHGDoc domain Heart Failure

Healthcare providers receive patient specific alerts in terms of diagnosing and treatment of patients with heart failure

Sponsors

Netherlands: Ministry of Health, Welfare and Sports
CollaboratorOTHER_GOV
Radboud University Medical Center
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Caregiver)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* General practices should use the information system MicroHIS X or Promedico ASP * NHGDoc should be available in the general practices

Exclusion criteria

* General practices that do not meet the inclusion criteria

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Prescribing of ACE-inhibitors/Angiotensin IIOne yearPercentage of patients with heart failure that is prescribed ACE-inhibitors/Angiotensin II
Prescribing of beta blockersOne yearPercentage of heart failure patients that is prescribed beta blockers
Prescribing of diureticsOne yearPercentage of heart failure patients that is prescribed diuretics

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Hospital admissionsOne yearNumber of hospital admissions of patients with heart failure
All cause mortalityOne yearNumber of patients with heart failure that die within the hospital

Countries

Netherlands

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 19, 2026