Skip to content

Nevirapine vs Ritonavir-boosted Lopinavir in ART Naive HIV-infected Adults in a Resource Limited Setting

Nevirapine vs Ritonavir-boosted Lopinavir in ART HIV-infected Adults in a Resource-limited Setting; a Randomized, Multicenter, Parallel Group Study

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01772940
Enrollment
425
Registered
2013-01-21
Start date
2008-12-31
Completion date
2011-12-31
Last updated
2013-08-26

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

HIV-1 Infection

Keywords

First-line therapy, Protease inhibitor, Non-Nucleoside Reverse transcriptase Inhibitor, Resource-limited setting

Brief summary

In resource-limited setting, concerns remain regarding the emergence of virologic failure and high-level drug resistance mutations (DRM) during WHO recommended first-line antiretroviral therapy (ART) with non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTI) based regimens for Human immunodeficiency virus 1 (HIV1) infected patients. The study hypothesis is that a boosted-protease inhibitor regimen has a better outcome than a NNRTI-based regimen with a low genetic barrier to resistance. The study is a randomized, multicenter, factorial trial (conducted in Congo), in treatment- naïve adults receiving for 96 weeks ritonavir- boosted lopinavir(LPV/r) or nevirapine (NVP) each in combination with tenofovir (TDF) /emtricitabine (FTC) or zidovudine (ZDV)/lamivudine (3TC). The primary end point is the incidence of therapeutic (clinical and/or virologic)failure by study week 24.

Interventions

DRUGnevirapine

Nevirapine 200 mg twice daily or 400 mg once daily per os during 96 weeks

ritonavir-boosted lopinavir 800/200 mg once daily or 400/100 mg twice daily per os during 96 weeks

tenofovir 300 mg/emtricitabine 200 mg fixed-dose combination once daily, per os for 96 weeks

zidovudine 300 mg/lamivudine 150 mg twice daily fixed-dose generic combination, per os for 96 weeks

Sponsors

University of Liege
CollaboratorOTHER
Ministry of Public Health, Democratic Republic of the Congo
CollaboratorOTHER_GOV
Pierre and Marie Curie University
CollaboratorOTHER
University Paris 7 - Denis Diderot
CollaboratorOTHER
Gilead Sciences
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Abbott
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Saint Pierre
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
FACTORIAL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Antiretroviral-therapy naïve HIV-1 infected Adults * WHO clinical stage 3 and CD4 \<350/mm3 or * WHO clinical stage 4 or * CD4 cell count \< 200/mm3 * Negative pregnancy test

Exclusion criteria

* Hemoglobin \< 8.5 g/dL (female) or 9.0 g/dL (male) * Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate \< 50 ml/ minute (Cockcroft-Gault equation) * Hepatic transaminases (AST and ALT)\> 3 x upper limit of normal * Active tuberculosis * Pregnancy * Females who are breastfeeding

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Incidence of therapeutic failureAt week 48 with follow-up until week 96The primary end point is the proportion of patients with therapeutic failure defined as: * the occurence or relapse by week 24 of a World Health Organization (WHO) stage 4 or 3 event, or * death by week 24, or * discontinuation of study drugs due to toxicity at any time, or * virological failure defined as HIV-1 RNA \> 1000 copies/ml by week 24

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
HIV-1 resistance mutationsAt baseline and at the time of virologic failure
HIV-1 RNA viral load less than 50 copies/mlThrough week 96The percentage of patients with HIV-1 RNA \< 50 copies/ml
Immunologic responseThrough week 96Cluster of differentiation 4 (CD4) cell count change from baseline
Safety and tolerabilityThrough week 96Incidence of adverse events and laboratory abnormalities
Changes in laboratory parametersThrough week 96

Countries

Republic of the Congo

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026