Skip to content

Bladder Lavage as Decontamination Method for Asymptomatic Bacteriuria With Uropathogens in Catheterized Patients

Pilot Study to Evaluate the Efficacy of Antiseptic Bladder Lavage Versus Pulsatile Lavage With Physiologic Serum in Catheterized Patients With Asymptomatic Bacteriuria With Uropathogens.

Status
Withdrawn
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01772875
Enrollment
0
Registered
2013-01-21
Start date
2013-01-31
Completion date
2014-01-20
Last updated
2020-08-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Catheter Related Infections

Keywords

urinary catheter, UTI, bladder lavage

Brief summary

In patients with advanced multiple sclerosis, permanent urinary catheters are often used to manage the urinary incontinence and bladder emptying problems. These catheters will lead to urinary tract infection, blocking of the catheter etc.. Especially infections with certain bacteria such as proteus, enterobacteriaceae and ESBL producing enterobacteriaceae and pseudomonas can pose a problem for the hospital infection control and for the patient. This study wants to evaluate the potential role of regular bladder lavage with saline, a solution of betadine, an acid solution of acetic acid and of URotainer Twin Suby G ( Braun)in the decontamination of these bladders and the prevention of clinically relevant urinary tract infections.

Detailed description

PAtients will be selected from the catheterised patient population of the National MS Center in Belgium for this prospective randomised comparative pilot studyon bladder lavage. The potential benefit for the patient is a reduction in number of clinical urinary tract infections and a reduction of antibiotic use. According to the type of bacteria that is cultured from the urine, patients will be allocated to one of 4 subgroups: * 30 patients will recieve bladder lavage with a Isobetadine Dermicum Solution * 20 patients will revieve bladder lavage with acetic acid solutions * 10 patients will recieve bladder lavage with saline * 10 patients will receive bladder lavage with Urotainer Suby G The effect will be measured by two repeat urine cultures after the bladder lavage( 2days and 5 days). From a safety perspective and to assess the irritation caused by the lavage, white blood cell counts in the urine will be done. Adverse events will be monitored according to GCP regulations.

Interventions

the bladder is rinced through the urinary catheter with the lavage solution

Sponsors

Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuven
CollaboratorOTHER
National Multiple Sclerosis Center
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 85 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* patients with an indwelling catheter * catheter associated bacteriuria with proteus, enterobacteriaceae or pseudomonas * willing and able to give informed consent to the study

Exclusion criteria

* patients with a clinically relevant UTI ( fever, pain or cloudy urine) * cognitively impaired patients * patients not able or willing to give informed consent * patients with allergies for ISobetadine dermicum or other substances used in the protocol * patients who only have a catheter for less than 1 month * patients taking systemic antibiotics during the last 48h

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
urinary cultureday 2 and day 5 after last bladder lavageAfter 5 consecutive days of bladder lavage, a urine culture will be taken at day 2 and 5. A count of \<100.000 CFU/ml and is considered a positive result. The outcome will be considered positive if this positive result is found in more than 30% of subjects.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
pyuriaday 2 and day 5 after the last bladder lavagechanges in white blood cell count are monitored at day 2 and 5 afte 5 consecutive days of bladder lavage. This is an assessment of bladder irritation.

Countries

Belgium

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026