Skip to content

The Comparison of Single Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy and Three Port Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

The Comparison of Single Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy and Three Port Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01772745
Enrollment
100
Registered
2013-01-21
Start date
2010-01-31
Completion date
2013-01-31
Last updated
2013-01-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Gallbladder Disease

Keywords

single incision, cholecystectomy, laparoscopy

Brief summary

Laparoscopic techniques have allowed surgeons to perform complicated intrabdominal surgery with minimal trauma. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy has been recognized since 1987 as the gold standard procedure for gallbladder surgery. Single incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) was developed with the aim of reducing the invasiveness of conventional laparoscopy. In this study we aimed to compare results of SILS cholecystectomy and three port conventional laparoscopic (TPCL) cholecystectomy prospectively

Detailed description

Single-incision laparoscopic procedures have evolved gradually to include a multitude of various surgeries. The current literature documents the use of a single-incision or single-port access surgery for cholecystectomies, adrenalectomies, splenectomies, appendectomies, herniorrhaphies, bariatrics, and colon surgery. Total of 100 patients who undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy for gallbladder disorders will randomly assign to undergo SILS cholecystectomy group (n = 50) or TPCL cholecystectomy group (n= 50) according to a computer-generated table of random numbers. Demographics (ie, age, gender, body mass index (BMI), American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) score, indication for operation, need for conversion to a standard or three port laparoscopic cholecystectomy, need for conversion to an open cholecystectomy will be recorded. Outcome measures include operative morbidity, operative time, pain score, hospital stay. Morbidity will be evaluated by rates of bile leak, wound infection, hospital readmission, and hernia.

Interventions

Single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy will be performed

PROCEDURETPCL cholecystectomy

Three port laparoscopic cholecystectomy will br performed

Sponsors

Maltepe University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Required laparoscopic cholecystectomy for gallbladder disease.

Exclusion criteria

* American Society of Anesthesiologists score (ASA) more than III, * Patients had prior abdominal surgery, * Patients admitted outside working hours with acute cholecystitis, * Patients have choledocolithiasis, * pregnancy, * ongoing peritoneal dialysis, * lack of written informed consent.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
pain scorePostoperative first 24 hoursPostoperative pain will be assessed according Visual analog scale from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain imaginable. Postoperative six hour VAS (POSH-VAS) and postoperative first day VAS (POFD-VAS) will be recorded and compared.
Intraoperative complicationsAverage of 70 minutesPer operative complications will be recorded. * Bleeding * Gallbladder perforation * Bile leakage * Bowel perforation * Complications associated with increased intra-abdominal pressure

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Operating timeAverage of 70 minutesThe operating time will be defined as the time from the first incision to the last suture's placement.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Length of hospital stayAverage of 2 daysLength of hospital stay will be recorded postoperative period.
Postoperative complications24th hour, 2nd day, 3rd day, 7th day, 1st month, 3rd month, 6th month, 1st yearPostoperative complications will be recorded postoperative follow up. * Bleeding * Bile leakage * Intrabdominal injury * Wound infection * Port site hernia

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 22, 2026