Solid Tumors
Conditions
Keywords
Solid Tumors, MSB0010718C, Phase 1, Pharmacokinetic, anti PD-L1, Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), Metastatic breast cancer (MBC), Gastric and gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) cancer, Ovarian cancer, Colorectal cancer (CRC), Castrate-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC), Melanoma, Urothelial carcinoma, Bladder cancer, Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC), Renal cell carcinoma (RCC), Adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC)
Brief summary
This is a Phase 1, open-label, dose-escalation trial of avelumab \[antibody targeting programmed death ligand 1 (anti PD-L1)\] with consecutive parallel group expansion in participants with selected tumor indications. New recruitment is open for all active cohorts. Active cohorts: Escalation revised dosing regimen cohort. Closed cohorts: Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC, first line), NSCLC (post-platinum), metastatic breast cancer (MBC), colorectal cancer (CRC), urothelial carcinoma (secondary), mesothelioma, gastric/GEJ cancer (first line switch maintenance and second line), and ovarian cancer (secondary and platinum refractory + liposomal doxorubicin), renal cell carcinoma (second line) melanoma and head, neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC), castrate-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC), adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC) urothelial carcinoma (efficacy), gastric/gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) cancer (third line), renal cell carcinoma (RCC, first line) and escalation phase .
Interventions
Participants received intravenous infusion of Avelumab in dose escalation and expansion cohorts until confirmed progression, unacceptable toxicity, or any reason for withdrawal from the trial or IMP occurs.
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
for dose escalation and expansion phase: * Signed written informed consent * Male or female participants aged greater than or equal to 18 years * Participants must have histologically or cytologically proven metastatic or locally advanced solid tumors, for which no standard therapy exists or standard therapy has failed. Availability of tumor archival material or fresh biopsies is optional for participants in dose escalation * Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0 to 1 at trial entry and an estimated life expectancy of at least 3 months * Disease must be measurable with at least 1 uni-dimensional measurable lesion by RECIST 1.1, except for participants with metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) or metastatic breast cancer (MBC) who may be enrolled with objective evidence of disease without a measureable lesion * Adequate hematological, hepatic and renal function as defined in the protocol * Effective contraception for both male and female participants if the risk of conception exists * Other protocol defined inclusion criteria could apply Inclusion Criteria for expansion phase: * Participants must have relapsed, refractory, or progressive disease following last line of treatment (with the exception of the gastric and gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) cancer cohort, which does not require progression). Availability of tumor archival material or fresh biopsies (excluding bone biopsies) is mandatory for eligibility in the expansion cohorts. For participants in the MBC cohort, the biopsy or surgical specimen must have been collected within 90 days prior to the first investigational medicinal product (IMP) administration. Specifically, the following will be required: * NSCLC post platinum doublet: Histologically or cytologically confirmed stage IIIB or stage IV NSCLC that has progressed after 1 line of platinum-containing doublet chemotherapy. Participants should have received only 1 line of platinum-containing treatment for metastatic disease (i.e., adjuvant treatment with a platinum-containing regimen is not sufficient for eligibility because not received in the context of a metastatic disease). Participants in the NSCLC cohort will only be enrolled in USA * NSCLC first line: Stage IV (per 7th International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer \[IASLC\] classification) or recurrent NSCLC that is histologically proven. Participants must not have received treatment for their metastatic or recurrent disease. No activating epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation nor ALK translocation/re-arrangement * Gastric and GEJ cancer: Histologically confirmed, unresectable locally advanced or metastatic adenocarcinoma of the gastric and gastro-esophageal junction, treated with first-line chemotherapy combination with or without disease progression. Participants should have received no more than 1 line of treatment for metastatic disease. Participants should not have been treated with trastuzumab (but can be Human Epidermal growth factor Receptor 2 \[HER2\] positive). Participants who received any platinum containing doublet or triplet as a neoadjuvant chemotherapy strategy, but are not ultimately candidates for surgery will also be eligible, as long as they did not have progressive disease after completion of the neoadjuvant chemotherapy. In addition, participants with gastric cancer can enter in the study if their white blood cell (WBC) and lymphocyte count is as defined in the protocol * MBC: Participants must have histologically confirmed locally advanced or MBC and have tumor that is refractory to or progressive after standard of care therapy. Participants must have received no more than 3 prior lines of cytotoxic therapy for metastatic disease. Participants must have received a taxane and an anthracycline, unless contra-indicated * Secondary expansion cohorts: Metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), Metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), melanoma, ovarian cancer, ACC, mesothelioma, urothelial carcinoma and renal cell carcinoma as defined in the protocol * Efficacy expansion cohorts: Gastric and GEJ cancer (third line), ovarian cancer (platinum Refractory + liposomal doxorubicin), urothelial carcinoma, and HNSCC as defined in the protocol * Other protocol defined inclusion criteria for expansion phase could apply
Exclusion criteria
for dose escalation and expansion phase: * Concurrent treatment with a non-permitted drug * Prior therapy with specific antibody/drug targeting T cell co-regulatory proteins (immune checkpoints) * Concurrent anticancer treatment, major surgery, or use of any investigational drug within 28 days before the start of trial treatment; or concurrent systemic therapy with immunosuppressive agents, use of hormonal agents within 7 days before the start of trial treatment as defined in the protocol. Note: Participants receiving bisphosphonate or denosumab are eligible provided treatment was initiated at least 14 days before the first dose of avelumab. * Previous malignant disease other than the target malignancy to be investigated in this trial within the last 5 years with the exception of basal or squamous cell carcinoma of the skin or cervical carcinoma in situ * Rapidly progressive disease (for example, tumor lysis syndrome) * Active or history of central nervous system metastases * Receipt of any organ transplantation including allogeneic stem-cell transplantation * Significant acute or chronic infections as defined in the protocol * Active or history of any autoimmune disease (Participants with diabetes Type 1, vitiligo, psoriasis, hypo- or hyperthyroid disease not requiring immunosuppressive treatment are eligible) or immunodeficiencies * Known severe hypersensitivity reactions to monoclonal antibodies, any history of anaphylaxis, or uncontrolled asthma * Persisting toxicity related to prior therapy greater than Grade 1 NCI-CTCAE v4.0, however sensory neuropathy less than or equal to Grade 2 is acceptable * Pregnancy or lactation period * Known alcohol or drug abuse * Clinically significant (that is, active) cardiovascular disease * All other significant diseases (for example, inflammatory bowel disease), which, in the opinion of the investigator, might impair the Participant's tolerance of trial treatment * Any psychiatric condition that would prohibit the understanding or rendering of informed consent * Legal incapacity or limited legal capacity * Non-oncology vaccine therapies for prevention of infection disease (for example, seasonal flu vaccine, human papilloma virus vaccine) within 4 weeks of study drug administration. Vaccination while on study is also prohibited except for administration of the inactivated influenza vaccine
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Dose Escalation Cohort (Excluding Once Weekly Avelumab 10 mg/kg Cohort): Number of Participants Experiencing Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLTs) | Dose Escalation: Baseline up to Week 3 | DLT: defined using National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events Version 4.0, as any one of following: any Grade (Gr) \>=3toxicity that is possibly/probably/ definitely related to avelumab, except for any of following: Gr 3 infusion-related reaction resolving within 6 hours and controlled with medical management, Transient Gr 3 flu-like symptoms/fever, which is controlled with medical management, Transient Gr 3 fatigue, local reactions, headache, nausea, emesis that resolves to \<= Gr 1, Gr3 diarrhea, Gr 3 skin toxicity, Gr 3 liver function test increase that resolves to \<= Gr1 in \< 7 days after medical management has been initiated, Single laboratory values out of normal range that were unlikely related to study treatment according to investigator, did not have any clinical correlate, and resolved to \<= Gr1 within 7 days with adequate medical management and tumor flare phenomenon defined as local pain, irritation/rash localized at sites of known/suspected tumor. |
| Efficacy Expansion Cohort (Ovarian Cancer): Number of Participants With Confirmed Best Overall Response (BOR) as Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1), as Adjudicated by Independent Endpoint Review Committee (IERC) | Ovarian Cancer Efficacy Expansion: Baseline up to Day 620 | Confirmed BOR was determined according to RECIST 1.1 and as adjudicated by an Independent Endpoint Review Committee (IERC) and defined as best response of any of complete response (CR), partial response (PR), stable disease (SD) and progressive disease (PD) recorded from date of randomization until disease progression/recurrence (taking smallest measurement recorded since start of treatment as reference). CR: Disappearance of all evidence of target/non-target lesions. PR: At least 30%reduction from baseline in sum of longest diameter (SLD) of all lesions. SD: Neither sufficient increase to qualify for PD nor sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR. PD: at least a 20% increase in SLD, taking as reference smallest SLD recorded from baseline/appearance of 1or more new lesions and unequivocal progression of non-target lesions. |
| Efficacy Expansion Cohort(Urothelial Carcinoma): Number of Participants With Confirmed Best Overall Response (BOR) as Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1), as Adjudicated by Independent Endpoint Review Committee (IERC) | Urothelial Carcinoma Efficacy Expansion: Baseline up to Day 931 | Confirmed BOR was determined according to RECIST 1.1 and as adjudicated by an Independent Endpoint Review Committee (IERC) and defined as best response of any of complete response (CR), partial response (PR), stable disease (SD) and progressive disease (PD) recorded from date of randomization until disease progression/recurrence (taking smallest measurement recorded since start of treatment as reference). CR: Disappearance of all evidence of target/non-target lesions. PR: At least 30% reduction from baseline in sum of longest diameter (SLD) of all lesions. SD: Neither sufficient increase to qualify for PD nor sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR. PD: at least a 20% increase in SLD, taking as reference smallest SLD recorded from baseline/appearance of 1 or more new lesions and unequivocal progression of non-target lesions. |
| Efficacy Expansion Cohort (GC/GEJC, Third Line): Number of Participants With Confirmed Best Overall Response (BOR) as Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1), as Adjudicated by Independent Endpoint Review Committee (IERC) | GC/GEJC, Third Line Efficacy Expansion: Baseline up to Day 871 | Confirmed BOR was determined according to RECIST 1.1 and as adjudicated by an Independent Endpoint Review Committee (IERC) and defined as best response of any of complete response (CR), partial response (PR), stable disease (SD) and progressive disease (PD) recorded from date of randomization until disease progression/recurrence (taking smallest measurement recorded since start of treatment as reference). CR: Disappearance of all evidence of target/non-target lesions. PR: At least 30% reduction from baseline in sum of longest diameter (SLD) of all lesions. SD: Neither sufficient increase to qualify for PD nor sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR. PD: at least a 20% increase in SLD, taking as reference smallest SLD recorded from baseline/appearance of 1 or more new lesions and unequivocal progression of non-target lesions. |
| Efficacy Expansion Cohort (HNSCC): Number of Participants With Confirmed Best Overall Response (BOR) as Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1), as Adjudicated by Independent Endpoint Review Committee (IERC) | HNSCC Efficacy Expansion: Baseline up to Day 1072 | Confirmed BOR was determined according to RECIST 1.1 and as adjudicated by an Independent Endpoint Review Committee (IERC) and defined as best response of any of complete response (CR), partial response (PR), stable disease (SD) and progressive disease (PD) recorded from date of randomization until disease progression/recurrence (taking smallest measurement recorded since start of treatment as reference). CR: Disappearance of all evidence of target/non-target lesions. PR: At least 30%reduction from baseline in sum of longest diameter (SLD) of all lesions. SD: Neither sufficient increase to qualify for PD nor sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR. PD: at least a 20% increase in SLD, taking as reference smallest SLD recorded from baseline/appearance of 1or more new lesions and unequivocal progression of non-target lesions. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Dose Escalation Cohort (Excluding Once Weekly Avelumab 10 mg/kg Cohort): Time to Reach Maximum Observed Serum Concentration (Tmax) of Avelumab | Pre-infusion, at end of 1-hour infusion (Day 1), 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6,12, 24, 36, 48 hours after end of infusion | Tmax is time to reach maximum observed serum concentration obtained directly from the concentration versus time curve. |
| Dose Escalation Cohort (Excluding Once Weekly Avelumab 10 mg/kg Cohort): Apparent Terminal Half-Life (t1/2) of Avelumab | Pre-infusion, at end of 1-hour infusion (Day 1), 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6,12, 24, 36, 48 hours after end of infusion | Apparent terminal half-life was defined as the time required for the serum concentration of drug to decrease 50 percent in the final stage of its elimination. |
| Dose Expansion Phase: Serum Concentration at End of Infusion (CEOI) of Avelumab | At Day 1, 15, 29, 43, 85, 127 and 169 | Serum concentration at end of infusion (CEOI) of Avelumab is reported. |
| Dose Expansion Phase: Minimum Serum Post-dose (Ctrough) Concentration of Avelumab | At Day 15, 29, 43, 57, 71, 85, 99, 127 and 169 | Serum Ctrough concentration of Avelumab is reported. |
| Dose Escalation Cohort (Excluding Once Weekly Avelumab 10 mg/kg Cohort): Number of Participants With Immune Related Best Overall Response (irBOR) According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC) | Dose Escalation: Baseline up to Day 1023 | irBOR defined as best response of any of immune related complete response (irCR), immune related partial response (irPR), immune related stable disease (irSD) and immune related progressive disease (irPD) recorded from baseline until immune related disease progression and determined according to modified irRC per investigator assessment. irCR: Complete disappearance of all tumor lesions (both index and non-index lesions with no new measurable/unmeasurable lesions). irPR: At least 30% reduction from baseline in the sum of the longest diameter (SLD) of all lesions). irSD: SLD of target and new measurable lesions neither irCR, irPR, or irPD. irPD: SLD of target and new measurable lesions increases greater than or equal to \[\>=\] 20%, confirmed by a repeat, consecutive observations at least 4 weeks from the date first documented. Number of participants with immune-related best overall response in each category (irCR, irPR, irSD, irPD) was reported. |
| Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Immune Related Best Overall Response (irBOR) According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC) | Dose Expansion: Baseline up to Day 2023 | irBOR defined as best response of any of immune related complete response (irCR), immune related partial response (irPR), immune related stable disease (irSD) and immune related progressive disease (irPD) recorded from baseline until immune related disease progression and determined according to modified irRC per investigator assessment. irCR: Complete disappearance of all tumor lesions (both index and non-index lesions with no new measurable/unmeasurable lesions). irPR: At least 30% reduction from baseline in the sum of the longest diameter (SLD) of all lesions). irSD: SLD of target and new measurable lesions neither irCR, irPR, or irPD. irPD: SLD of target and new measurable lesions increases greater than or equal to \[\>=\] 20%, confirmed by a repeat, consecutive observations at least 4 weeks from the date first documented. Number of participants with immune-related best overall response in each category (irCR, irPR, irSD, irPD) was reported. |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 | Dose Escalation: Baseline up to Day 2511 | BOR was determined according to RECIST v1.1 and as per investigator assessment. BOR is defined as the best response of any of complete response (CR), partial response (PR), stable disease (SD) and progressive disease (PD) recorded from date of randomization until disease progression or recurrence (taking the smallest measurement recorded since start of treatment as reference). CR: Disappearance of all evidence of target and non-target lesions. PR: At least 30 percent (%) reduction from baseline in the sum of the longest diameter (SLD) of all lesions. SD =Neither sufficient increase to qualify for PD nor sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR. PD is defined as at least a 20 % increase in the SLD, taking as reference the smallest SLD recorded from baseline or appearance of 1 or more new lesions and unequivocal progression of non-target lesions. Number of participants with best overall response in each category (CR, PR, SD, PD) was reported. |
| Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 | Dose Expansion: Baseline up to Day 2023 | BOR was determined according to RECIST v1.1 and as per investigator assessment. BOR is defined as the best response of any of complete response (CR), partial response (PR), stable disease (SD) and progressive disease (PD) recorded from date of randomization until disease progression or recurrence (taking the smallest measurement recorded since start of treatment as reference). CR: Disappearance of all evidence of target and non-target lesions. PR: At least 30 percent (%) reduction from baseline in the sum of the longest diameter (SLD) of all lesions. SD = Neither sufficient increase to qualify for PD nor sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR. PD is defined as at least a 20 % increase in the SLD, taking as reference the smallest SLD recorded from baseline or appearance of 1 or more new lesions and unequivocal progression of non-target lesions. Number of participants with best overall response in each category (CR, PR, SD, PD) was reported. |
| Dose Expansion Cohort (Secondary Urothelial Carcinoma Cohort): Number of Participants With Confirmed Best Overall Response According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 as Adjudicated by an Independent Endpoint Review Committee | Secondary Urothelial Carcinoma Dose Expansion: Baseline up to Day 931 | Confirmed Best Overall Response (BOR) was determined according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) v1.1and as adjudicated by an Independent Endpoint Review Committee (IERC) is defined as best response of any of complete response (CR), partial response (PR), stable disease (SD) and progressive disease (PD) recorded from date of randomization until disease progression/recurrence (taking smallest measurement recorded since start of treatment as reference). CR: Disappearance of all evidence of target/non-target lesions. PR: At least 30% reduction from baseline in sum of longest diameter (SLD) of all lesions. SD: Neither sufficient increase to qualify for PD nor sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR. PD: at least a 20% increase in SLD, taking as reference smallest SLD recorded from baseline/appearance of 1or more new lesions and unequivocal progression of non-target lesions. Number of participants with BOR in each category (CR, PR, SD, PD) were reported. |
| Dose Expansion Cohort: Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Time According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version (RECIST) 1.1 | Dose Expansion: Baseline up to Day 2023 | The PFS time (based on investigator assessments), according to the RECIST 1.1, was defined as the time from first administration of study treatment until first documentation of progressive disease (PD) or death when death occurred within 12 weeks of the last tumor assessment or first administration of study treatment (whichever was later). PD was defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of longest diameter (SLD), taking as reference the smallest SLD recorded from baseline or the appearance of 1 or more new lesions and unequivocal progression of non-target lesions. The analysis of PFS was performed with a Kaplan-Meier method. |
| Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per Severity | Up to Day 2511 | Adverse event(AE): any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with use of study drug, whether or not related to study drug. A serious adverse event(SAE) was an AE that resulted in any of following outcomes: death; life threatening; persistent/significant disability/incapacity; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; congenital anomaly/birth defect or was otherwise considered medically important. Treatment-emergent events were events between first dose of study drug that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pre-treatment state up to 30 days after last administration.TEAEs included both Serious TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs. Severity of TEAEs were graded using National Cancer Institute-Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) version 4.0 toxicity grades, as follows: Grade 1= Mild, Grade 2= Moderate, Grade 3= Severe, Grade 4= Life-threatening and Grade 5= Death. |
| Dose Expansion Cohort: Overall Survival (OS) Time | Dose Expansion: Baseline up to Day 2023 | Overall survival time was measured as time in months first administration of trial treatment to death. The analysis of OS time was performed with a Kaplan-Meier method. |
| Dose Escalation Cohort (Excluding Once Weekly Avelumab 10 mg/kg Cohort): Programmed Death Ligand 1 (PD-L1) Receptor Occupancy | Pre-infusion on Day 1; 48 hours after infusion on Day 3; Pre-infusion on Days 15, 43, and 85 | Percentage of PD-L1 receptors occupied by avelumab on human lymphocytes (CD3+ T-cells) was assessed by flow cytometry on peripheral blood mononuclear cell (PBMC) samples. Greater than or equal to \[\>=\] 85 percent \[%\] of cell viability was required for reliable receptor occupancy assessment. |
| Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Positive Programmed Death Receptor-1 Ligand-1 (PD-L1) Biomarker Expression in Tumor Tissue | Dose Expansion: Baseline up to Day 2023 | PD-L1 assessment was performed using immunohistochemistry. PD-L1 expression status was classified as positive or negative based on the following cut-offs: For tumor cells: Participants were considered PD-L1 expression positive (negative): - if at least (less than) 5% of the tumor cells show PD-L1 membrane staining \>= 1+, respectively. This was used as the primary cut-off; - if at least (less than) 25% of the tumor cells show PD-L1 membrane staining \>=2+, respectively. This was considered as secondary cut-off; - if at least (less than) 1% of the tumor cells show PD-L1 membrane staining \>=1+, respectively. This was used as the tertiary cut-off; - if at least (less than) 50% of the tumor cells show PD-L1 membrane staining \>=1+, respectively. This was used as the '50% cut-off'; - if at least (less than) 80% of the tumor cells show PD-L1 membrane staining ≥1+, respectively. This was used as the '80% cut-off'. |
| Primary Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Unconfirmed Response at Week 13 According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 | Week 13 | The response criteria evaluation was carried out according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1. CR and PR did not need to be confirmed by a subsequent tumor assessment due to blinded central assessment. CR: Disappearance of all target lesions since baseline; PR: At least a 30% decrease in the sum of the diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters; SD: Neither sufficient increase to qualify for PD nor sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR and PD: at least a 20% increase in SLD, taking as reference smallest SLD recorded from baseline/appearance of 1or more new lesions and unequivocal progression of non-target lesions. Number of participants with unconfirmed response at week 13 according to response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST) version 1.1 were reported. |
| Dose Expansion Cohort: Duration of Response According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 Per Investigator Assessment | Dose Expansion: Baseline up to Day 2023 | Duration of response according to RECIST 1.1, per investigator assessment was calculated for each participant with a confirmed response (complete response \[CR\] or partial response \[PR\]) as the time from the first observation of response to the first observation of documented disease progression (or death within 12 weeks of the last tumor assessment). CR: Disappearance of all evidence of target and non-target lesions. PR: At least 30 percent (%) reduction from baseline in the sum of the longest diameter (SLD) of all lesions. Results were calculated based on Kaplan-Meier estimates. |
| Dose Expansion Cohort: Duration of Response According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC) Per Investigator Assessment | Dose Expansion: Baseline up to Day 2023 | Duration of response according to modified irRC, per investigator assessment was calculated for each participant with a confirmed response (immune-related complete response \[irCR\] or immune-related partial response \[irPR\]) as the time from the first observation of response to the first observation of documented disease progression (or death within 12 weeks of the last tumor assessment). irCR: Complete disappearance of all tumor lesions (both index and non-index lesions with no new measurable/unmeasurable lesions). irPR: At least 30% reduction from baseline in the sum of the longest diameter (SLD) of all lesions). Results were calculated based on Kaplan-Meier estimates. |
| Efficacy Expansion Cohorts: Duration of Response According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 as Per Independent Endpoint Review Committee (IERC) | Efficacy Expansion: Baseline up to Day 1072 | Duration of response according to modified irRC, per investigator assessment was calculated for each participant with a confirmed response (immune-related complete response \[irCR\] or immune-related partial response \[irPR\]) as the time from the first observation of response to the first observation of documented disease progression (or death within 12 weeks of the last tumor assessment). irCR: Complete disappearance of all tumor lesions (both index and non-index lesions with no new measurable/unmeasurable lesions). irPR: At least 30% reduction from baseline in the sum of the longest diameter (SLD) of all lesions). Results were calculated based on Kaplan-Meier estimates. |
| Efficacy Expansion Cohorts: Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Time According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version (RECIST) 1.1 as Per Independent Endpoint Review Committee (IERC) | Efficacy Expansion: Baseline up to Day 1072 | The PFS time (based on IERC), according to the RECIST 1.1, was defined as the time from first administration of study treatment until first documentation of progressive disease (PD) or death when death occurred within 12 weeks of the last tumor assessment or first administration of study treatment (whichever was later). PD was defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of longest diameter (SLD), taking as reference the smallest SLD recorded from baseline or the appearance of 1 or more new lesions and unequivocal progression of non-target lesions. The analysis of PFS was performed with a Kaplan-Meier method. |
| Dose Escalation Cohort (Excluding Once Weekly Avelumab 10 mg/kg Cohort): Number of Participants With at Least 1 Positive Anti Drug Antibodies (ADA) | Dose Escalation: Baseline up to Day 1023 | Serum samples were analyzed by a validated electrochemiluminescence immunoassay to detect the presence of antidrug antibodies (ADA). Number of participants with ADA positive results for Avelumab were reported. |
| Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Atleast 1 Positive Anti Drug Antibodies (ADA) Assay | Dose Expansion: Baseline up to Day 2023 | Serum samples were analyzed by a validated electrochemiluminescence immunoassay to detect the presence of antidrug antibodies (ADA). Number of participants with ADA positive results for Avelumab were reported. |
| Dose Expansion Cohort: Immune Related Progression-Free Survival (irPFS) Time According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC) | Dose Expansion: Baseline up to Day 2023 | The irPFS time was defined as the time from first administration of study treatment until first documentation of immune-related progressive disease (irPD) or death when death occurred within 12 weeks of the last tumor assessment or first administration of study treatment (whichever was later). irPD: sum of the longest diameters of target and new measurable lesions increases greater than or equal to \[\>=\] 20%, confirmed by a repeat, consecutive observations at least 4 weeks from the date first documented. The analysis of irPFS will be performed with a Kaplan-Meier method. Data for immune related progression-free survival time has been reported. |
| Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per Severity | Baseline up to Day 2511 | AE was defined as any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of study drug, whether or not related to study drug. Treatment-emergent events were the events between first dose of study drug that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pre-treatment state up to 30 days after last administration. TEAEs included both Serious TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs. Treatment related AE was defined as having a Possible or Related relationship to study treatment, as assessed by the Investigator. Severity of Treatment-Related TEAEs were graded using NCI-CTCAE version 4.0 toxicity grades, as follows: Grade 1= Mild, Grade 2= Moderate, Grade 3= Severe, Grade 4= Life-threatening and Grade 5= Death. |
| Dose Escalation Cohort (Excluding Once Weekly Avelumab 10 mg/kg Cohort): Area Under Serum Concentration-Time Curve From the Time of Dosing to the Time of the Last Observation (AUC0-t) of Avelumab | Pre-infusion, at end of 1-hour infusion (Day 1), 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6,12, 24, 36, 48 hours after end of infusion | Area under the serum concentration versus time curve from time zero to the last sampling time t at which the concentration is at or above the lower limit of quantification (LLLQ). AUC(0-t) was calculated according to the mixed log-linear trapezoidal rule. |
| Dose Escalation Cohort (Excluding Once Weekly Avelumab 10 mg/kg Cohort): Area Under the Serum Concentration-Time Curve From Time Zero to Infinity (AUC0-infinity) of Avelumab | Pre-infusion, at end of 1-hour infusion (Day 1), 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6,12, 24, 36, 48 hours after end of infusion | The AUC(0-inf) was estimated by determining the total area under the curve of the concentration versus time curve extrapolated to infinity. |
| Dose Escalation Cohort (Excluding Once Weekly Avelumab 10 mg/kg Cohort): Maximum Observed Serum Concentration (Cmax) of Avelumab | Pre-infusion, at end of 1-hour infusion (Day 1), 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6,12, 24, 36, 48 hours after end of infusion | Cmax is the maximum observed serum concentration obtained directly from the concentration versus time curve. |
Countries
Belgium, Czechia, France, Germany, Poland, South Korea, Taiwan, United Kingdom, United States
Participant flow
Pre-assignment details
First participant signed informed consent: 31 January 2013, Last Participant Last Visit: 16 December 2019.
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 1.0 mg/kg Participants with metastatic or locally advanced solid tumors received intravenous infusion of Avelumab at a dose of 1.0 mg/kg once every 2 weeks in dose escalation cohort until confirmed progression, unacceptable toxicity, or any reason for withdrawal from the trial or IMP occurs. | 4 |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 3.0 mg/kg Participants with metastatic or locally advanced solid tumors received intravenous infusion of Avelumab at a dose of 3.0 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg) once every 2 weeks in dose escalation cohort until confirmed progression, unacceptable toxicity, or any reason for withdrawal from the trial or investigational medicinal product (IMP) occurs. | 13 |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 10.0 mg/kg Participants with metastatic or locally advanced solid tumors received intravenous infusion of Avelumab at a dose of 10.0 mg/kg once every 2 weeks in dose escalation cohort until confirmed progression, unacceptable toxicity, or any reason for withdrawal from the trial or IMP occurs. | 15 |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 20.0 mg/kg Participants with metastatic or locally advanced solid tumors received intravenous infusion of Avelumab at a dose of 20.0 mg/kg once every 2 weeks in dose escalation cohort until confirmed progression, unacceptable toxicity, or any reason for withdrawal from the trial or IMP occurs. | 21 |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 10.0 mg/kg Weekly Participants with metastatic or locally advanced solid tumors received intravenous infusion of Avelumab at a dose of 10.0 mg/kg once weekly for the first 12 weeks and once every 2 weeks starting Week 13 in dose escalation cohort until confirmed progression, unacceptable toxicity, or any reason for withdrawal from the trial or IMP occurs. | 8 |
| Primary Expansion Cohort: NSCLC, Post-platinum Doublet Participants with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), who had progressed after 1 line of platinum-containing doublet chemotherapy received intravenous infusion of Avelumab at a dose of 10.0 mg/kg once every 2 weeks in primary expansion cohort until confirmed progression, unacceptable toxicity, or any reason for withdrawal from the trial or IMP occurs. | 184 |
| Primary Expansion Cohort: NSCLC, First Line Participants with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), first line received intravenous infusion of Avelumab at a dose of 10.0 mg/kg once every 2 weeks in primary expansion cohort until confirmed progression, unacceptable toxicity, or any reason for withdrawal from the trial or IMP occurs. | 156 |
| Primary Expansion Cohort: Metastatic Breast Cancer Participants with metastatic breast cancer received intravenous infusion of Avelumab at a dose of 10.0 mg/kg once every 2 weeks in primary expansion cohort until confirmed progression, unacceptable toxicity, or any reason for withdrawal from the trial or IMP occurs. | 168 |
| Primary Expansion Cohort: GC/GEJC Progressed Participants with gastric and gastroesophageal cancer who progressed on or after first-line chemotherapy received intravenous infusion of Avelumab at a dose of 10.0 mg/kg once every 2 weeks in primary expansion cohort until confirmed progression, unacceptable toxicity, or any reason for withdrawal from the trial or IMP occurs. | 60 |
| Primary Expansion Cohort: GC/GEJC Non Progressed Participants with gastric and gastroesophageal cancer who non-progressed on or after first-line chemotherapy received intravenous infusion of Avelumab at a dose of 10.0 mg/kg once every 2 weeks in primary expansion cohort until confirmed progression, unacceptable toxicity, or any reason for withdrawal from the trial or IMP occurs. | 90 |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Colorectal Cancer Participants with colorectal cancer received intravenous infusion of Avelumab at a dose of 10.0 mg/kg once every 2 weeks in secondary expansion cohort until confirmed progression, unacceptable toxicity, or any reason for withdrawal from the trial or IMP occurs. | 21 |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Castrate-resistant Prostate Cancer Participants with castrate-resistant prostate cancer received intravenous infusion of Avelumab at a dose of 10.0 mg/kg once every 2 weeks in secondary expansion cohort until confirmed progression, unacceptable toxicity, or any reason for withdrawal from the trial or IMP occurs. | 18 |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Adrenocortical Carcinoma Participants with adrenocortical carcinoma received intravenous infusion of Avelumab at a dose of 10.0 mg/kg once every 2 weeks in secondary expansion cohort until confirmed progression, unacceptable toxicity, or any reason for withdrawal from the trial or IMP occurs. | 50 |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Melanoma Participants with melanoma received intravenous infusion of Avelumab at a dose of 10.0 mg/kg once every 2 weeks in secondary expansion cohort until confirmed progression, unacceptable toxicity, or any reason for withdrawal from the trial or IMP occurs. | 51 |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Mesothelioma Participants with mesothelioma received intravenous infusion of Avelumab at a dose of 10.0 mg/kg once every 2 weeks in secondary expansion cohort until confirmed progression, unacceptable toxicity, or any reason for withdrawal from the trial or IMP occurs. | 53 |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Urothelial Carcinoma Participants with urothelial carcinoma received intravenous infusion of Avelumab at a dose of 10.0 mg/kg once every 2 weeks in secondary expansion cohort until confirmed progression, unacceptable toxicity, or any reason for withdrawal from the trial or IMP occurs. | 44 |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Ovarian Cancer Participants with ovarian carcinoma received intravenous infusion of Avelumab at a dose of 10.0 mg/kg once every 2 weeks in secondary expansion cohort until confirmed progression, unacceptable toxicity, or any reason for withdrawal from the trial or IMP occurs. | 125 |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Renal Cell Carcinoma (First Line) Participants with Renal cell carcinoma received intravenous infusion of Avelumab at a dose of 10.0 mg/kg once every 2 weeks as a first-line therapy in secondary expansion cohort until confirmed progression, unacceptable toxicity, or any reason for withdrawal from the trial or IMP occurs. | 62 |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Renal Cell Carcinoma (Second Line) Participants with Renal cell carcinoma who failed 1 prior systemic first-line regimen received intravenous infusion of Avelumab at a dose of 10.0 mg/kg once every 2 weeks as a second line treatment in secondary expansion cohort until confirmed progression, unacceptable toxicity, or any reason for withdrawal from the trial or IMP occurs. | 20 |
| Efficacy Expansion Cohort: Ovarian Cancer Participants with ovarian carcinoma received intravenous infusion of Avelumab at a dose of 10.0 mg/kg once every 2 weeks in efficacy expansion cohort until confirmed progression, unacceptable toxicity, or any reason for withdrawal from the trial or IMP occurs. | 103 |
| Efficacy Expansion Cohort: Urothelial Carcinoma Participants with urothelial carcinoma received intravenous infusion of Avelumab at a dose of 10.0 mg/kg once every 2 weeks in efficacy expansion cohort until confirmed progression, unacceptable toxicity, or any reason for withdrawal from the trial or IMP occurs. | 205 |
| Efficacy Expansion Cohort: GC/GEJC, Third Line Participants with gastric (GC) and gastroesophageal junction cancer (GEJC) who have failed both a first-line chemotherapy regimen and subsequent ramucirumab therapy, received intravenous infusion of Avelumab at a dose of 10.0 mg/kg once every 2 weeks as a third-line treatment in efficacy expansion cohort until confirmed progression, unacceptable toxicity, or any reason for withdrawal from the trial or IMP occurs. | 132 |
| Efficacy Expansion Cohort: HNSCC Participants with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) received intravenous infusion of Avelumab at a dose of 10.0 mg/kg once every 2 weeks in efficacy expansion cohort until confirmed progression, unacceptable toxicity, or any reason for withdrawal from the trial or IMP occurs. | 153 |
| Total | 1,756 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Total | Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 3.0 mg/kg | Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 10.0 mg/kg | Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 20.0 mg/kg | Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 10.0 mg/kg Weekly | Primary Expansion Cohort: NSCLC, Post-platinum Doublet | Primary Expansion Cohort: NSCLC, First Line | Primary Expansion Cohort: Metastatic Breast Cancer | Primary Expansion Cohort: GC/GEJC Progressed | Primary Expansion Cohort: GC/GEJC Non Progressed | Secondary Expansion Cohort: Colorectal Cancer | Secondary Expansion Cohort: Castrate-resistant Prostate Cancer | Secondary Expansion Cohort: Adrenocortical Carcinoma | Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 1.0 mg/kg | Secondary Expansion Cohort: Melanoma | Secondary Expansion Cohort: Mesothelioma | Secondary Expansion Cohort: Urothelial Carcinoma | Secondary Expansion Cohort: Ovarian Cancer | Secondary Expansion Cohort: Renal Cell Carcinoma (First Line) | Secondary Expansion Cohort: Renal Cell Carcinoma (Second Line) | Efficacy Expansion Cohort: Ovarian Cancer | Efficacy Expansion Cohort: Urothelial Carcinoma | Efficacy Expansion Cohort: GC/GEJC, Third Line | Efficacy Expansion Cohort: HNSCC |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Categorical <=18 years | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Age, Categorical >=65 years | 776 Participants | 4 Participants | 5 Participants | 3 Participants | 3 Participants | 94 Participants | 105 Participants | 28 Participants | 22 Participants | 29 Participants | 2 Participants | 11 Participants | 4 Participants | 1 Participants | 23 Participants | 33 Participants | 33 Participants | 51 Participants | 25 Participants | 13 Participants | 51 Participants | 139 Participants | 41 Participants | 56 Participants |
| Age, Categorical Between 18 and 65 years | 980 Participants | 9 Participants | 10 Participants | 18 Participants | 5 Participants | 90 Participants | 51 Participants | 140 Participants | 38 Participants | 61 Participants | 19 Participants | 7 Participants | 46 Participants | 3 Participants | 28 Participants | 20 Participants | 11 Participants | 74 Participants | 37 Participants | 7 Participants | 52 Participants | 66 Participants | 91 Participants | 97 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) American Indian or Alaska Native | 5 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 1 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 2 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 2 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Asian | 163 Participants | 0 Participants | 2 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 5 Participants | 6 Participants | 3 Participants | 13 Participants | 35 Participants | 1 Participants | 0 Participants | 3 Participants | 1 Participants | 2 Participants | 0 Participants | 2 Participants | 1 Participants | 6 Participants | 0 Participants | 7 Participants | 15 Participants | 42 Participants | 19 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Black or African American | 91 Participants | 0 Participants | 2 Participants | 0 Participants | 3 Participants | 12 Participants | 12 Participants | 16 Participants | 4 Participants | 4 Participants | 2 Participants | 4 Participants | 1 Participants | 0 Participants | 1 Participants | 0 Participants | 2 Participants | 3 Participants | 1 Participants | 1 Participants | 4 Participants | 9 Participants | 6 Participants | 4 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) More than one race | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander | 4 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 2 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 1 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 1 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 183 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 1 Participants | 0 Participants | 6 Participants | 14 Participants | 8 Participants | 7 Participants | 7 Participants | 1 Participants | 2 Participants | 14 Participants | 0 Participants | 12 Participants | 10 Participants | 4 Participants | 5 Participants | 20 Participants | 0 Participants | 1 Participants | 25 Participants | 12 Participants | 34 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) White | 1310 Participants | 13 Participants | 11 Participants | 20 Participants | 5 Participants | 159 Participants | 124 Participants | 141 Participants | 36 Participants | 44 Participants | 17 Participants | 12 Participants | 32 Participants | 3 Participants | 35 Participants | 43 Participants | 35 Participants | 114 Participants | 35 Participants | 19 Participants | 91 Participants | 155 Participants | 70 Participants | 96 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 861 Participants | 9 Participants | 8 Participants | 7 Participants | 6 Participants | 84 Participants | 73 Participants | 167 Participants | 14 Participants | 22 Participants | 7 Participants | 0 Participants | 26 Participants | 2 Participants | 17 Participants | 21 Participants | 14 Participants | 125 Participants | 19 Participants | 5 Participants | 103 Participants | 57 Participants | 47 Participants | 28 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 895 Participants | 4 Participants | 7 Participants | 14 Participants | 2 Participants | 100 Participants | 83 Participants | 1 Participants | 46 Participants | 68 Participants | 14 Participants | 18 Participants | 24 Participants | 2 Participants | 34 Participants | 32 Participants | 30 Participants | 0 Participants | 43 Participants | 15 Participants | 0 Participants | 148 Participants | 85 Participants | 125 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk | EG002 affected / at risk | EG003 affected / at risk | EG004 affected / at risk | EG005 affected / at risk | EG006 affected / at risk | EG007 affected / at risk | EG008 affected / at risk | EG009 affected / at risk | EG010 affected / at risk | EG011 affected / at risk | EG012 affected / at risk | EG013 affected / at risk | EG014 affected / at risk | EG015 affected / at risk | EG016 affected / at risk | EG017 affected / at risk | EG018 affected / at risk | EG019 affected / at risk | EG020 affected / at risk | EG021 affected / at risk | EG022 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 4 / 4 | 11 / 13 | 11 / 15 | 16 / 21 | 2 / 8 | 161 / 184 | 124 / 156 | 141 / 168 | 50 / 60 | 75 / 90 | 18 / 21 | 7 / 18 | 27 / 50 | 25 / 51 | 34 / 53 | 31 / 44 | 87 / 125 | 17 / 62 | 14 / 20 | 71 / 103 | 129 / 205 | 118 / 132 | 129 / 153 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 4 / 4 | 13 / 13 | 15 / 15 | 21 / 21 | 8 / 8 | 178 / 184 | 152 / 156 | 159 / 168 | 58 / 60 | 86 / 90 | 20 / 21 | 17 / 18 | 50 / 50 | 50 / 51 | 53 / 53 | 44 / 44 | 122 / 125 | 62 / 62 | 19 / 20 | 102 / 103 | 202 / 205 | 125 / 132 | 143 / 153 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 3 / 4 | 6 / 13 | 6 / 15 | 8 / 21 | 0 / 8 | 95 / 184 | 80 / 156 | 66 / 168 | 36 / 60 | 44 / 90 | 8 / 21 | 2 / 18 | 32 / 50 | 24 / 51 | 22 / 53 | 19 / 44 | 42 / 125 | 14 / 62 | 7 / 20 | 48 / 103 | 114 / 205 | 87 / 132 | 73 / 153 |
Outcome results
Dose Escalation Cohort (Excluding Once Weekly Avelumab 10 mg/kg Cohort): Number of Participants Experiencing Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLTs)
DLT: defined using National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events Version 4.0, as any one of following: any Grade (Gr) \>=3toxicity that is possibly/probably/ definitely related to avelumab, except for any of following: Gr 3 infusion-related reaction resolving within 6 hours and controlled with medical management, Transient Gr 3 flu-like symptoms/fever, which is controlled with medical management, Transient Gr 3 fatigue, local reactions, headache, nausea, emesis that resolves to \<= Gr 1, Gr3 diarrhea, Gr 3 skin toxicity, Gr 3 liver function test increase that resolves to \<= Gr1 in \< 7 days after medical management has been initiated, Single laboratory values out of normal range that were unlikely related to study treatment according to investigator, did not have any clinical correlate, and resolved to \<= Gr1 within 7 days with adequate medical management and tumor flare phenomenon defined as local pain, irritation/rash localized at sites of known/suspected tumor.
Time frame: Dose Escalation: Baseline up to Week 3
Population: DLT analysis set included all participants with data used for implementing the dose-escalation schedule. These participants should have received all study drug administrations in the DLT evaluation period, or should have stopped treatment because of DLTs in the DLT evaluation period.
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 1.0 mg/kg | Dose Escalation Cohort (Excluding Once Weekly Avelumab 10 mg/kg Cohort): Number of Participants Experiencing Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLTs) | 0 Participants |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 3.0 mg/kg | Dose Escalation Cohort (Excluding Once Weekly Avelumab 10 mg/kg Cohort): Number of Participants Experiencing Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLTs) | 0 Participants |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 10.0 mg/kg | Dose Escalation Cohort (Excluding Once Weekly Avelumab 10 mg/kg Cohort): Number of Participants Experiencing Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLTs) | 0 Participants |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 20.0 mg/kg | Dose Escalation Cohort (Excluding Once Weekly Avelumab 10 mg/kg Cohort): Number of Participants Experiencing Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLTs) | 1 Participants |
Efficacy Expansion Cohort (GC/GEJC, Third Line): Number of Participants With Confirmed Best Overall Response (BOR) as Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1), as Adjudicated by Independent Endpoint Review Committee (IERC)
Confirmed BOR was determined according to RECIST 1.1 and as adjudicated by an Independent Endpoint Review Committee (IERC) and defined as best response of any of complete response (CR), partial response (PR), stable disease (SD) and progressive disease (PD) recorded from date of randomization until disease progression/recurrence (taking smallest measurement recorded since start of treatment as reference). CR: Disappearance of all evidence of target/non-target lesions. PR: At least 30% reduction from baseline in sum of longest diameter (SLD) of all lesions. SD: Neither sufficient increase to qualify for PD nor sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR. PD: at least a 20% increase in SLD, taking as reference smallest SLD recorded from baseline/appearance of 1 or more new lesions and unequivocal progression of non-target lesions.
Time frame: GC/GEJC, Third Line Efficacy Expansion: Baseline up to Day 871
Population: Full analysis set (FAS) included all participants who have received at least 1 dose of study treatment.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 1.0 mg/kg | Efficacy Expansion Cohort (GC/GEJC, Third Line): Number of Participants With Confirmed Best Overall Response (BOR) as Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1), as Adjudicated by Independent Endpoint Review Committee (IERC) | Complete response (CR) | 2 Participants |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 1.0 mg/kg | Efficacy Expansion Cohort (GC/GEJC, Third Line): Number of Participants With Confirmed Best Overall Response (BOR) as Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1), as Adjudicated by Independent Endpoint Review Committee (IERC) | Partial response (PR) | 5 Participants |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 1.0 mg/kg | Efficacy Expansion Cohort (GC/GEJC, Third Line): Number of Participants With Confirmed Best Overall Response (BOR) as Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1), as Adjudicated by Independent Endpoint Review Committee (IERC) | Progressive disease (PD) | 72 Participants |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 1.0 mg/kg | Efficacy Expansion Cohort (GC/GEJC, Third Line): Number of Participants With Confirmed Best Overall Response (BOR) as Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1), as Adjudicated by Independent Endpoint Review Committee (IERC) | Non-CR/Non-PD | 5 Participants |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 1.0 mg/kg | Efficacy Expansion Cohort (GC/GEJC, Third Line): Number of Participants With Confirmed Best Overall Response (BOR) as Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1), as Adjudicated by Independent Endpoint Review Committee (IERC) | Non-evaluable | 24 Participants |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 1.0 mg/kg | Efficacy Expansion Cohort (GC/GEJC, Third Line): Number of Participants With Confirmed Best Overall Response (BOR) as Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1), as Adjudicated by Independent Endpoint Review Committee (IERC) | Stable disease (SD) | 24 Participants |
Efficacy Expansion Cohort (HNSCC): Number of Participants With Confirmed Best Overall Response (BOR) as Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1), as Adjudicated by Independent Endpoint Review Committee (IERC)
Confirmed BOR was determined according to RECIST 1.1 and as adjudicated by an Independent Endpoint Review Committee (IERC) and defined as best response of any of complete response (CR), partial response (PR), stable disease (SD) and progressive disease (PD) recorded from date of randomization until disease progression/recurrence (taking smallest measurement recorded since start of treatment as reference). CR: Disappearance of all evidence of target/non-target lesions. PR: At least 30%reduction from baseline in sum of longest diameter (SLD) of all lesions. SD: Neither sufficient increase to qualify for PD nor sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR. PD: at least a 20% increase in SLD, taking as reference smallest SLD recorded from baseline/appearance of 1or more new lesions and unequivocal progression of non-target lesions.
Time frame: HNSCC Efficacy Expansion: Baseline up to Day 1072
Population: Full analysis set (FAS) included all participants who have received at least 1 dose of study treatment.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 1.0 mg/kg | Efficacy Expansion Cohort (HNSCC): Number of Participants With Confirmed Best Overall Response (BOR) as Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1), as Adjudicated by Independent Endpoint Review Committee (IERC) | Complete response (CR) | 2 Participants |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 1.0 mg/kg | Efficacy Expansion Cohort (HNSCC): Number of Participants With Confirmed Best Overall Response (BOR) as Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1), as Adjudicated by Independent Endpoint Review Committee (IERC) | Partial response (PR) | 12 Participants |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 1.0 mg/kg | Efficacy Expansion Cohort (HNSCC): Number of Participants With Confirmed Best Overall Response (BOR) as Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1), as Adjudicated by Independent Endpoint Review Committee (IERC) | Stable disease (SD) | 46 Participants |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 1.0 mg/kg | Efficacy Expansion Cohort (HNSCC): Number of Participants With Confirmed Best Overall Response (BOR) as Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1), as Adjudicated by Independent Endpoint Review Committee (IERC) | Progressive disease (PD) | 67 Participants |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 1.0 mg/kg | Efficacy Expansion Cohort (HNSCC): Number of Participants With Confirmed Best Overall Response (BOR) as Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1), as Adjudicated by Independent Endpoint Review Committee (IERC) | Non-evaluable | 25 Participants |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 1.0 mg/kg | Efficacy Expansion Cohort (HNSCC): Number of Participants With Confirmed Best Overall Response (BOR) as Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1), as Adjudicated by Independent Endpoint Review Committee (IERC) | Non-CR/Non-PD | 1 Participants |
Efficacy Expansion Cohort (Ovarian Cancer): Number of Participants With Confirmed Best Overall Response (BOR) as Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1), as Adjudicated by Independent Endpoint Review Committee (IERC)
Confirmed BOR was determined according to RECIST 1.1 and as adjudicated by an Independent Endpoint Review Committee (IERC) and defined as best response of any of complete response (CR), partial response (PR), stable disease (SD) and progressive disease (PD) recorded from date of randomization until disease progression/recurrence (taking smallest measurement recorded since start of treatment as reference). CR: Disappearance of all evidence of target/non-target lesions. PR: At least 30%reduction from baseline in sum of longest diameter (SLD) of all lesions. SD: Neither sufficient increase to qualify for PD nor sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR. PD: at least a 20% increase in SLD, taking as reference smallest SLD recorded from baseline/appearance of 1or more new lesions and unequivocal progression of non-target lesions.
Time frame: Ovarian Cancer Efficacy Expansion: Baseline up to Day 620
Population: Full analysis set (FAS) included all participants who have received at least 1 dose of study treatment.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 1.0 mg/kg | Efficacy Expansion Cohort (Ovarian Cancer): Number of Participants With Confirmed Best Overall Response (BOR) as Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1), as Adjudicated by Independent Endpoint Review Committee (IERC) | Complete response (CR) | 3 Participants |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 1.0 mg/kg | Efficacy Expansion Cohort (Ovarian Cancer): Number of Participants With Confirmed Best Overall Response (BOR) as Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1), as Adjudicated by Independent Endpoint Review Committee (IERC) | Partial response (PR) | 1 Participants |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 1.0 mg/kg | Efficacy Expansion Cohort (Ovarian Cancer): Number of Participants With Confirmed Best Overall Response (BOR) as Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1), as Adjudicated by Independent Endpoint Review Committee (IERC) | Non-CR/Non-PD | 3 Participants |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 1.0 mg/kg | Efficacy Expansion Cohort (Ovarian Cancer): Number of Participants With Confirmed Best Overall Response (BOR) as Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1), as Adjudicated by Independent Endpoint Review Committee (IERC) | Stable disease (SD) | 41 Participants |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 1.0 mg/kg | Efficacy Expansion Cohort (Ovarian Cancer): Number of Participants With Confirmed Best Overall Response (BOR) as Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1), as Adjudicated by Independent Endpoint Review Committee (IERC) | Progressive disease (PD) | 39 Participants |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 1.0 mg/kg | Efficacy Expansion Cohort (Ovarian Cancer): Number of Participants With Confirmed Best Overall Response (BOR) as Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1), as Adjudicated by Independent Endpoint Review Committee (IERC) | Non-evaluable | 16 Participants |
Efficacy Expansion Cohort(Urothelial Carcinoma): Number of Participants With Confirmed Best Overall Response (BOR) as Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1), as Adjudicated by Independent Endpoint Review Committee (IERC)
Confirmed BOR was determined according to RECIST 1.1 and as adjudicated by an Independent Endpoint Review Committee (IERC) and defined as best response of any of complete response (CR), partial response (PR), stable disease (SD) and progressive disease (PD) recorded from date of randomization until disease progression/recurrence (taking smallest measurement recorded since start of treatment as reference). CR: Disappearance of all evidence of target/non-target lesions. PR: At least 30% reduction from baseline in sum of longest diameter (SLD) of all lesions. SD: Neither sufficient increase to qualify for PD nor sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR. PD: at least a 20% increase in SLD, taking as reference smallest SLD recorded from baseline/appearance of 1 or more new lesions and unequivocal progression of non-target lesions.
Time frame: Urothelial Carcinoma Efficacy Expansion: Baseline up to Day 931
Population: Full analysis set (FAS) included all participants who have received at least 1 dose of study treatment. Here, Overall Number of Participants Analyzed signifies those participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 1.0 mg/kg | Efficacy Expansion Cohort(Urothelial Carcinoma): Number of Participants With Confirmed Best Overall Response (BOR) as Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1), as Adjudicated by Independent Endpoint Review Committee (IERC) | Partial response (PR) | 26 Participants |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 1.0 mg/kg | Efficacy Expansion Cohort(Urothelial Carcinoma): Number of Participants With Confirmed Best Overall Response (BOR) as Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1), as Adjudicated by Independent Endpoint Review Committee (IERC) | Stable disease (SD) | 51 Participants |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 1.0 mg/kg | Efficacy Expansion Cohort(Urothelial Carcinoma): Number of Participants With Confirmed Best Overall Response (BOR) as Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1), as Adjudicated by Independent Endpoint Review Committee (IERC) | Progressive disease (PD) | 77 Participants |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 1.0 mg/kg | Efficacy Expansion Cohort(Urothelial Carcinoma): Number of Participants With Confirmed Best Overall Response (BOR) as Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1), as Adjudicated by Independent Endpoint Review Committee (IERC) | Non-evaluable | 37 Participants |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 1.0 mg/kg | Efficacy Expansion Cohort(Urothelial Carcinoma): Number of Participants With Confirmed Best Overall Response (BOR) as Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1), as Adjudicated by Independent Endpoint Review Committee (IERC) | Complete response (CR) | 6 Participants |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 1.0 mg/kg | Efficacy Expansion Cohort(Urothelial Carcinoma): Number of Participants With Confirmed Best Overall Response (BOR) as Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1), as Adjudicated by Independent Endpoint Review Committee (IERC) | Non-CR/Non-PD | 1 Participants |
Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per Severity
Adverse event(AE): any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with use of study drug, whether or not related to study drug. A serious adverse event(SAE) was an AE that resulted in any of following outcomes: death; life threatening; persistent/significant disability/incapacity; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; congenital anomaly/birth defect or was otherwise considered medically important. Treatment-emergent events were events between first dose of study drug that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pre-treatment state up to 30 days after last administration.TEAEs included both Serious TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs. Severity of TEAEs were graded using National Cancer Institute-Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) version 4.0 toxicity grades, as follows: Grade 1= Mild, Grade 2= Moderate, Grade 3= Severe, Grade 4= Life-threatening and Grade 5= Death.
Time frame: Up to Day 2511
Population: Safety analysis set (SAF) included all participants who have received at least 1 dose of study treatment.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 1.0 mg/kg | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with TEAEs with missing Grade | 0 Participants |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 1.0 mg/kg | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with TEAEs with Grade 1 severity | 0 Participants |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 1.0 mg/kg | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with TEAEs | 4 Participants |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 1.0 mg/kg | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with TEAEs with Grade 4 severity | 0 Participants |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 1.0 mg/kg | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with TEAEs with Grade 5 severity | 2 Participants |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 1.0 mg/kg | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with TEAEs with Grade 3 severity | 2 Participants |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 1.0 mg/kg | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with TEAEs with Grade 2 severity | 0 Participants |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 3.0 mg/kg | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with TEAEs with Grade 2 severity | 4 Participants |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 3.0 mg/kg | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with TEAEs | 13 Participants |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 3.0 mg/kg | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with TEAEs with Grade 1 severity | 1 Participants |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 3.0 mg/kg | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with TEAEs with Grade 3 severity | 4 Participants |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 3.0 mg/kg | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with TEAEs with Grade 5 severity | 4 Participants |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 3.0 mg/kg | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with TEAEs with missing Grade | 0 Participants |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 3.0 mg/kg | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with TEAEs with Grade 4 severity | 0 Participants |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 10.0 mg/kg | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with TEAEs with Grade 4 severity | 2 Participants |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 10.0 mg/kg | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with TEAEs | 15 Participants |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 10.0 mg/kg | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with TEAEs with Grade 3 severity | 6 Participants |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 10.0 mg/kg | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with TEAEs with Grade 1 severity | 1 Participants |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 10.0 mg/kg | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with TEAEs with missing Grade | 0 Participants |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 10.0 mg/kg | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with TEAEs with Grade 2 severity | 4 Participants |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 10.0 mg/kg | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with TEAEs with Grade 5 severity | 2 Participants |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 20.0 mg/kg | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with TEAEs with Grade 5 severity | 1 Participants |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 20.0 mg/kg | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with TEAEs with Grade 1 severity | 2 Participants |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 20.0 mg/kg | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with TEAEs | 21 Participants |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 20.0 mg/kg | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with TEAEs with Grade 2 severity | 6 Participants |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 20.0 mg/kg | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with TEAEs with missing Grade | 0 Participants |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 20.0 mg/kg | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with TEAEs with Grade 4 severity | 1 Participants |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 20.0 mg/kg | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with TEAEs with Grade 3 severity | 11 Participants |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 10.0 mg/kg Weekly | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with TEAEs with missing Grade | 0 Participants |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 10.0 mg/kg Weekly | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with TEAEs with Grade 1 severity | 2 Participants |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 10.0 mg/kg Weekly | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with TEAEs | 8 Participants |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 10.0 mg/kg Weekly | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with TEAEs with Grade 3 severity | 3 Participants |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 10.0 mg/kg Weekly | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with TEAEs with Grade 2 severity | 3 Participants |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 10.0 mg/kg Weekly | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with TEAEs with Grade 5 severity | 0 Participants |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 10.0 mg/kg Weekly | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with TEAEs with Grade 4 severity | 0 Participants |
| Primary Expansion Cohort: NSCLC, Post-platinum Doublet | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with TEAEs | 182 Participants |
| Primary Expansion Cohort: NSCLC, Post-platinum Doublet | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with TEAEs with Grade 1 severity | 11 Participants |
| Primary Expansion Cohort: NSCLC, Post-platinum Doublet | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with TEAEs with Grade 2 severity | 54 Participants |
| Primary Expansion Cohort: NSCLC, Post-platinum Doublet | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with TEAEs with Grade 4 severity | 19 Participants |
| Primary Expansion Cohort: NSCLC, Post-platinum Doublet | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with TEAEs with missing Grade | 0 Participants |
| Primary Expansion Cohort: NSCLC, Post-platinum Doublet | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with TEAEs with Grade 5 severity | 32 Participants |
| Primary Expansion Cohort: NSCLC, Post-platinum Doublet | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with TEAEs with Grade 3 severity | 66 Participants |
| Primary Expansion Cohort: NSCLC, First Line | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with TEAEs with Grade 3 severity | 68 Participants |
| Primary Expansion Cohort: NSCLC, First Line | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with TEAEs with Grade 5 severity | 25 Participants |
| Primary Expansion Cohort: NSCLC, First Line | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with TEAEs with Grade 2 severity | 45 Participants |
| Primary Expansion Cohort: NSCLC, First Line | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with TEAEs with Grade 1 severity | 3 Participants |
| Primary Expansion Cohort: NSCLC, First Line | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with TEAEs with Grade 4 severity | 15 Participants |
| Primary Expansion Cohort: NSCLC, First Line | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with TEAEs with missing Grade | 0 Participants |
| Primary Expansion Cohort: NSCLC, First Line | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with TEAEs | 156 Participants |
| Primary Expansion Cohort: Metastatic Breast Cancer | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with TEAEs with missing Grade | 0 Participants |
| Primary Expansion Cohort: Metastatic Breast Cancer | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with TEAEs with Grade 1 severity | 22 Participants |
| Primary Expansion Cohort: Metastatic Breast Cancer | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with TEAEs with Grade 2 severity | 58 Participants |
| Primary Expansion Cohort: Metastatic Breast Cancer | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with TEAEs with Grade 4 severity | 12 Participants |
| Primary Expansion Cohort: Metastatic Breast Cancer | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with TEAEs with Grade 5 severity | 24 Participants |
| Primary Expansion Cohort: Metastatic Breast Cancer | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with TEAEs with Grade 3 severity | 45 Participants |
| Primary Expansion Cohort: Metastatic Breast Cancer | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with TEAEs | 161 Participants |
| Primary Expansion Cohort: GC/GEJC Progressed | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with TEAEs with missing Grade | 0 Participants |
| Primary Expansion Cohort: GC/GEJC Progressed | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with TEAEs | 60 Participants |
| Primary Expansion Cohort: GC/GEJC Progressed | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with TEAEs with Grade 3 severity | 29 Participants |
| Primary Expansion Cohort: GC/GEJC Progressed | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with TEAEs with Grade 2 severity | 9 Participants |
| Primary Expansion Cohort: GC/GEJC Progressed | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with TEAEs with Grade 5 severity | 10 Participants |
| Primary Expansion Cohort: GC/GEJC Progressed | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with TEAEs with Grade 1 severity | 5 Participants |
| Primary Expansion Cohort: GC/GEJC Progressed | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with TEAEs with Grade 4 severity | 7 Participants |
| Primary Expansion Cohort: GC/GEJC Non Progressed | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with TEAEs with Grade 4 severity | 4 Participants |
| Primary Expansion Cohort: GC/GEJC Non Progressed | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with TEAEs with Grade 2 severity | 19 Participants |
| Primary Expansion Cohort: GC/GEJC Non Progressed | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with TEAEs with Grade 5 severity | 10 Participants |
| Primary Expansion Cohort: GC/GEJC Non Progressed | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with TEAEs with Grade 1 severity | 14 Participants |
| Primary Expansion Cohort: GC/GEJC Non Progressed | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with TEAEs with missing Grade | 0 Participants |
| Primary Expansion Cohort: GC/GEJC Non Progressed | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with TEAEs | 88 Participants |
| Primary Expansion Cohort: GC/GEJC Non Progressed | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with TEAEs with Grade 3 severity | 41 Participants |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Colorectal Cancer | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with TEAEs with Grade 2 severity | 9 Participants |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Colorectal Cancer | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with TEAEs | 21 Participants |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Colorectal Cancer | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with TEAEs with Grade 5 severity | 3 Participants |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Colorectal Cancer | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with TEAEs with Grade 4 severity | 1 Participants |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Colorectal Cancer | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with TEAEs with Grade 1 severity | 2 Participants |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Colorectal Cancer | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with TEAEs with missing Grade | 0 Participants |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Colorectal Cancer | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with TEAEs with Grade 3 severity | 6 Participants |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Castrate-resistant Prostate Cancer | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with TEAEs with Grade 2 severity | 5 Participants |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Castrate-resistant Prostate Cancer | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with TEAEs with missing Grade | 0 Participants |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Castrate-resistant Prostate Cancer | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with TEAEs | 17 Participants |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Castrate-resistant Prostate Cancer | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with TEAEs with Grade 4 severity | 0 Participants |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Castrate-resistant Prostate Cancer | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with TEAEs with Grade 3 severity | 7 Participants |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Castrate-resistant Prostate Cancer | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with TEAEs with Grade 1 severity | 5 Participants |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Castrate-resistant Prostate Cancer | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with TEAEs with Grade 5 severity | 0 Participants |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Adrenocortical Carcinoma | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with TEAEs with Grade 3 severity | 25 Participants |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Adrenocortical Carcinoma | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with TEAEs with missing Grade | 0 Participants |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Adrenocortical Carcinoma | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with TEAEs with Grade 2 severity | 10 Participants |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Adrenocortical Carcinoma | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with TEAEs | 50 Participants |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Adrenocortical Carcinoma | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with TEAEs with Grade 4 severity | 8 Participants |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Adrenocortical Carcinoma | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with TEAEs with Grade 5 severity | 6 Participants |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Adrenocortical Carcinoma | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with TEAEs with Grade 1 severity | 1 Participants |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Melanoma | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with TEAEs with missing Grade | 0 Participants |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Melanoma | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with TEAEs with Grade 1 severity | 2 Participants |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Melanoma | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with TEAEs with Grade 2 severity | 17 Participants |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Melanoma | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with TEAEs with Grade 3 severity | 21 Participants |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Melanoma | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with TEAEs with Grade 5 severity | 5 Participants |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Melanoma | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with TEAEs | 50 Participants |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Melanoma | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with TEAEs with Grade 4 severity | 5 Participants |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Mesothelioma | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with TEAEs | 53 Participants |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Mesothelioma | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with TEAEs with missing Grade | 0 Participants |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Mesothelioma | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with TEAEs with Grade 5 severity | 4 Participants |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Mesothelioma | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with TEAEs with Grade 4 severity | 3 Participants |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Mesothelioma | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with TEAEs with Grade 1 severity | 2 Participants |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Mesothelioma | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with TEAEs with Grade 3 severity | 23 Participants |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Mesothelioma | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with TEAEs with Grade 2 severity | 21 Participants |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Urothelial Carcinoma | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with TEAEs with Grade 5 severity | 7 Participants |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Urothelial Carcinoma | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with TEAEs with Grade 3 severity | 18 Participants |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Urothelial Carcinoma | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with TEAEs with Grade 4 severity | 6 Participants |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Urothelial Carcinoma | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with TEAEs with missing Grade | 0 Participants |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Urothelial Carcinoma | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with TEAEs with Grade 2 severity | 10 Participants |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Urothelial Carcinoma | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with TEAEs with Grade 1 severity | 3 Participants |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Urothelial Carcinoma | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with TEAEs | 44 Participants |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Ovarian Cancer | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with TEAEs | 122 Participants |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Ovarian Cancer | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with TEAEs with Grade 3 severity | 42 Participants |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Ovarian Cancer | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with TEAEs with Grade 4 severity | 3 Participants |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Ovarian Cancer | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with TEAEs with missing Grade | 0 Participants |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Ovarian Cancer | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with TEAEs with Grade 2 severity | 52 Participants |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Ovarian Cancer | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with TEAEs with Grade 1 severity | 11 Participants |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Ovarian Cancer | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with TEAEs with Grade 5 severity | 14 Participants |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Renal Cell Carcinoma (First Line) | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with TEAEs with Grade 1 severity | 7 Participants |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Renal Cell Carcinoma (First Line) | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with TEAEs with Grade 2 severity | 25 Participants |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Renal Cell Carcinoma (First Line) | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with TEAEs with Grade 5 severity | 4 Participants |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Renal Cell Carcinoma (First Line) | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with TEAEs with missing Grade | 0 Participants |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Renal Cell Carcinoma (First Line) | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with TEAEs with Grade 4 severity | 6 Participants |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Renal Cell Carcinoma (First Line) | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with TEAEs | 62 Participants |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Renal Cell Carcinoma (First Line) | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with TEAEs with Grade 3 severity | 20 Participants |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Renal Cell Carcinoma (Second Line) | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with TEAEs with Grade 1 severity | 1 Participants |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Renal Cell Carcinoma (Second Line) | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with TEAEs with Grade 5 severity | 2 Participants |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Renal Cell Carcinoma (Second Line) | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with TEAEs with Grade 4 severity | 1 Participants |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Renal Cell Carcinoma (Second Line) | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with TEAEs with Grade 3 severity | 10 Participants |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Renal Cell Carcinoma (Second Line) | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with TEAEs with Grade 2 severity | 5 Participants |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Renal Cell Carcinoma (Second Line) | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with TEAEs | 19 Participants |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Renal Cell Carcinoma (Second Line) | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with TEAEs with missing Grade | 0 Participants |
| Efficacy Expansion Cohort: Ovarian Cancer | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with TEAEs with Grade 4 severity | 6 Participants |
| Efficacy Expansion Cohort: Ovarian Cancer | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with TEAEs with Grade 3 severity | 45 Participants |
| Efficacy Expansion Cohort: Ovarian Cancer | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with TEAEs with Grade 1 severity | 7 Participants |
| Efficacy Expansion Cohort: Ovarian Cancer | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with TEAEs with missing Grade | 0 Participants |
| Efficacy Expansion Cohort: Ovarian Cancer | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with TEAEs with Grade 2 severity | 30 Participants |
| Efficacy Expansion Cohort: Ovarian Cancer | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with TEAEs | 103 Participants |
| Efficacy Expansion Cohort: Ovarian Cancer | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with TEAEs with Grade 5 severity | 15 Participants |
| Efficacy Expansion Cohort: Urothelial Carcinoma | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with TEAEs with Grade 4 severity | 16 Participants |
| Efficacy Expansion Cohort: Urothelial Carcinoma | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with TEAEs with Grade 3 severity | 82 Participants |
| Efficacy Expansion Cohort: Urothelial Carcinoma | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with TEAEs with Grade 5 severity | 45 Participants |
| Efficacy Expansion Cohort: Urothelial Carcinoma | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with TEAEs with Grade 2 severity | 46 Participants |
| Efficacy Expansion Cohort: Urothelial Carcinoma | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with TEAEs | 204 Participants |
| Efficacy Expansion Cohort: Urothelial Carcinoma | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with TEAEs with Grade 1 severity | 15 Participants |
| Efficacy Expansion Cohort: Urothelial Carcinoma | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with TEAEs with missing Grade | 0 Participants |
| Efficacy Expansion Cohort: GC/GEJC, Third Line | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with TEAEs with Grade 3 severity | 51 Participants |
| Efficacy Expansion Cohort: GC/GEJC, Third Line | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with TEAEs with Grade 2 severity | 30 Participants |
| Efficacy Expansion Cohort: GC/GEJC, Third Line | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with TEAEs | 130 Participants |
| Efficacy Expansion Cohort: GC/GEJC, Third Line | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with TEAEs with Grade 4 severity | 12 Participants |
| Efficacy Expansion Cohort: GC/GEJC, Third Line | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with TEAEs with missing Grade | 0 Participants |
| Efficacy Expansion Cohort: GC/GEJC, Third Line | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with TEAEs with Grade 1 severity | 2 Participants |
| Efficacy Expansion Cohort: GC/GEJC, Third Line | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with TEAEs with Grade 5 severity | 35 Participants |
| Efficacy Expansion Cohort: HNSCC | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with TEAEs with Grade 4 severity | 12 Participants |
| Efficacy Expansion Cohort: HNSCC | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with TEAEs with missing Grade | 1 Participants |
| Efficacy Expansion Cohort: HNSCC | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with TEAEs with Grade 3 severity | 54 Participants |
| Efficacy Expansion Cohort: HNSCC | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with TEAEs with Grade 5 severity | 25 Participants |
| Efficacy Expansion Cohort: HNSCC | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with TEAEs with Grade 1 severity | 14 Participants |
| Efficacy Expansion Cohort: HNSCC | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with TEAEs | 149 Participants |
| Efficacy Expansion Cohort: HNSCC | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with TEAEs with Grade 2 severity | 43 Participants |
Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per Severity
AE was defined as any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of study drug, whether or not related to study drug. Treatment-emergent events were the events between first dose of study drug that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pre-treatment state up to 30 days after last administration. TEAEs included both Serious TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs. Treatment related AE was defined as having a Possible or Related relationship to study treatment, as assessed by the Investigator. Severity of Treatment-Related TEAEs were graded using NCI-CTCAE version 4.0 toxicity grades, as follows: Grade 1= Mild, Grade 2= Moderate, Grade 3= Severe, Grade 4= Life-threatening and Grade 5= Death.
Time frame: Baseline up to Day 2511
Population: SAF included all participants who have received at least 1 dose of study treatment.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 1.0 mg/kg | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with Grade 5 severity | 0 Participants |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 1.0 mg/kg | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with Grade 4 severity | 0 Participants |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 1.0 mg/kg | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with Grade 2 severity | 1 Participants |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 1.0 mg/kg | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with Grade 1 severity | 1 Participants |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 1.0 mg/kg | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with Treatment-Related TEAEs | 3 Participants |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 1.0 mg/kg | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with Grade 3 severity | 1 Participants |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 1.0 mg/kg | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with missing Grade | 0 Participants |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 3.0 mg/kg | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with Grade 4 severity | 0 Participants |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 3.0 mg/kg | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with Grade 1 severity | 5 Participants |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 3.0 mg/kg | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with Grade 5 severity | 0 Participants |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 3.0 mg/kg | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with Grade 2 severity | 4 Participants |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 3.0 mg/kg | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with Grade 3 severity | 0 Participants |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 3.0 mg/kg | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with missing Grade | 0 Participants |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 3.0 mg/kg | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with Treatment-Related TEAEs | 9 Participants |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 10.0 mg/kg | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with missing Grade | 0 Participants |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 10.0 mg/kg | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with Grade 4 severity | 1 Participants |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 10.0 mg/kg | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with Grade 5 severity | 0 Participants |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 10.0 mg/kg | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with Grade 2 severity | 3 Participants |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 10.0 mg/kg | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with Grade 1 severity | 7 Participants |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 10.0 mg/kg | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with Grade 3 severity | 3 Participants |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 10.0 mg/kg | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with Treatment-Related TEAEs | 14 Participants |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 20.0 mg/kg | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with Grade 4 severity | 1 Participants |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 20.0 mg/kg | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with Grade 1 severity | 6 Participants |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 20.0 mg/kg | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with missing Grade | 0 Participants |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 20.0 mg/kg | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with Grade 2 severity | 8 Participants |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 20.0 mg/kg | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with Grade 5 severity | 0 Participants |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 20.0 mg/kg | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with Treatment-Related TEAEs | 17 Participants |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 20.0 mg/kg | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with Grade 3 severity | 2 Participants |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 10.0 mg/kg Weekly | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with Grade 5 severity | 0 Participants |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 10.0 mg/kg Weekly | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with Grade 2 severity | 4 Participants |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 10.0 mg/kg Weekly | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with Grade 4 severity | 0 Participants |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 10.0 mg/kg Weekly | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with Grade 3 severity | 1 Participants |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 10.0 mg/kg Weekly | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with Treatment-Related TEAEs | 7 Participants |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 10.0 mg/kg Weekly | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with missing Grade | 0 Participants |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 10.0 mg/kg Weekly | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with Grade 1 severity | 2 Participants |
| Primary Expansion Cohort: NSCLC, Post-platinum Doublet | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with Treatment-Related TEAEs | 146 Participants |
| Primary Expansion Cohort: NSCLC, Post-platinum Doublet | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with Grade 2 severity | 71 Participants |
| Primary Expansion Cohort: NSCLC, Post-platinum Doublet | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with missing Grade | 0 Participants |
| Primary Expansion Cohort: NSCLC, Post-platinum Doublet | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with Grade 3 severity | 21 Participants |
| Primary Expansion Cohort: NSCLC, Post-platinum Doublet | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with Grade 1 severity | 46 Participants |
| Primary Expansion Cohort: NSCLC, Post-platinum Doublet | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with Grade 5 severity | 0 Participants |
| Primary Expansion Cohort: NSCLC, Post-platinum Doublet | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with Grade 4 severity | 8 Participants |
| Primary Expansion Cohort: NSCLC, First Line | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with Grade 4 severity | 3 Participants |
| Primary Expansion Cohort: NSCLC, First Line | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with Grade 3 severity | 17 Participants |
| Primary Expansion Cohort: NSCLC, First Line | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with Grade 2 severity | 60 Participants |
| Primary Expansion Cohort: NSCLC, First Line | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with Grade 5 severity | 0 Participants |
| Primary Expansion Cohort: NSCLC, First Line | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with Grade 1 severity | 29 Participants |
| Primary Expansion Cohort: NSCLC, First Line | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with Treatment-Related TEAEs | 109 Participants |
| Primary Expansion Cohort: NSCLC, First Line | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with missing Grade | 0 Participants |
| Primary Expansion Cohort: Metastatic Breast Cancer | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with missing Grade | 0 Participants |
| Primary Expansion Cohort: Metastatic Breast Cancer | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with Grade 4 severity | 5 Participants |
| Primary Expansion Cohort: Metastatic Breast Cancer | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with Treatment-Related TEAEs | 118 Participants |
| Primary Expansion Cohort: Metastatic Breast Cancer | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with Grade 5 severity | 2 Participants |
| Primary Expansion Cohort: Metastatic Breast Cancer | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with Grade 3 severity | 13 Participants |
| Primary Expansion Cohort: Metastatic Breast Cancer | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with Grade 2 severity | 46 Participants |
| Primary Expansion Cohort: Metastatic Breast Cancer | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with Grade 1 severity | 52 Participants |
| Primary Expansion Cohort: GC/GEJC Progressed | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with Grade 3 severity | 4 Participants |
| Primary Expansion Cohort: GC/GEJC Progressed | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with Grade 2 severity | 9 Participants |
| Primary Expansion Cohort: GC/GEJC Progressed | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with Grade 5 severity | 0 Participants |
| Primary Expansion Cohort: GC/GEJC Progressed | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with Grade 4 severity | 1 Participants |
| Primary Expansion Cohort: GC/GEJC Progressed | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with Grade 1 severity | 14 Participants |
| Primary Expansion Cohort: GC/GEJC Progressed | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with missing Grade | 0 Participants |
| Primary Expansion Cohort: GC/GEJC Progressed | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with Treatment-Related TEAEs | 28 Participants |
| Primary Expansion Cohort: GC/GEJC Non Progressed | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with Grade 4 severity | 0 Participants |
| Primary Expansion Cohort: GC/GEJC Non Progressed | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with Grade 1 severity | 27 Participants |
| Primary Expansion Cohort: GC/GEJC Non Progressed | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with missing Grade | 0 Participants |
| Primary Expansion Cohort: GC/GEJC Non Progressed | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with Grade 2 severity | 22 Participants |
| Primary Expansion Cohort: GC/GEJC Non Progressed | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with Grade 3 severity | 7 Participants |
| Primary Expansion Cohort: GC/GEJC Non Progressed | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with Treatment-Related TEAEs | 57 Participants |
| Primary Expansion Cohort: GC/GEJC Non Progressed | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with Grade 5 severity | 1 Participants |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Colorectal Cancer | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with Grade 5 severity | 0 Participants |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Colorectal Cancer | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with Grade 3 severity | 3 Participants |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Colorectal Cancer | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with Grade 4 severity | 0 Participants |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Colorectal Cancer | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with Grade 2 severity | 9 Participants |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Colorectal Cancer | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with Treatment-Related TEAEs | 16 Participants |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Colorectal Cancer | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with missing Grade | 0 Participants |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Colorectal Cancer | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with Grade 1 severity | 4 Participants |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Castrate-resistant Prostate Cancer | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with Grade 4 severity | 0 Participants |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Castrate-resistant Prostate Cancer | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with Grade 1 severity | 8 Participants |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Castrate-resistant Prostate Cancer | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with Treatment-Related TEAEs | 15 Participants |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Castrate-resistant Prostate Cancer | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with Grade 2 severity | 6 Participants |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Castrate-resistant Prostate Cancer | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with Grade 3 severity | 1 Participants |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Castrate-resistant Prostate Cancer | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with Grade 5 severity | 0 Participants |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Castrate-resistant Prostate Cancer | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with missing Grade | 0 Participants |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Adrenocortical Carcinoma | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with Grade 4 severity | 0 Participants |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Adrenocortical Carcinoma | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with Grade 3 severity | 8 Participants |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Adrenocortical Carcinoma | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with Grade 5 severity | 0 Participants |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Adrenocortical Carcinoma | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with Grade 1 severity | 12 Participants |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Adrenocortical Carcinoma | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with Treatment-Related TEAEs | 41 Participants |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Adrenocortical Carcinoma | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with Grade 2 severity | 21 Participants |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Adrenocortical Carcinoma | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with missing Grade | 0 Participants |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Melanoma | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with Grade 3 severity | 4 Participants |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Melanoma | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with Grade 2 severity | 20 Participants |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Melanoma | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with Grade 5 severity | 0 Participants |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Melanoma | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with Grade 1 severity | 15 Participants |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Melanoma | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with missing Grade | 0 Participants |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Melanoma | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with Grade 4 severity | 0 Participants |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Melanoma | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with Treatment-Related TEAEs | 39 Participants |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Mesothelioma | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with Grade 1 severity | 8 Participants |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Mesothelioma | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with Grade 4 severity | 2 Participants |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Mesothelioma | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with Grade 2 severity | 30 Participants |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Mesothelioma | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with Grade 5 severity | 0 Participants |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Mesothelioma | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with missing Grade | 0 Participants |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Mesothelioma | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with Treatment-Related TEAEs | 43 Participants |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Mesothelioma | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with Grade 3 severity | 3 Participants |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Urothelial Carcinoma | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with Grade 5 severity | 0 Participants |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Urothelial Carcinoma | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with Grade 1 severity | 11 Participants |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Urothelial Carcinoma | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with Grade 2 severity | 18 Participants |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Urothelial Carcinoma | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with missing Grade | 0 Participants |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Urothelial Carcinoma | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with Grade 3 severity | 2 Participants |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Urothelial Carcinoma | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with Treatment-Related TEAEs | 32 Participants |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Urothelial Carcinoma | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with Grade 4 severity | 1 Participants |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Ovarian Cancer | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with missing Grade | 0 Participants |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Ovarian Cancer | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with Grade 1 severity | 46 Participants |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Ovarian Cancer | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with Grade 4 severity | 2 Participants |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Ovarian Cancer | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with Grade 2 severity | 31 Participants |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Ovarian Cancer | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with Grade 5 severity | 0 Participants |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Ovarian Cancer | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with Treatment-Related TEAEs | 86 Participants |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Ovarian Cancer | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with Grade 3 severity | 7 Participants |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Renal Cell Carcinoma (First Line) | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with Grade 2 severity | 23 Participants |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Renal Cell Carcinoma (First Line) | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with Grade 3 severity | 3 Participants |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Renal Cell Carcinoma (First Line) | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with missing Grade | 0 Participants |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Renal Cell Carcinoma (First Line) | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with Grade 4 severity | 5 Participants |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Renal Cell Carcinoma (First Line) | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with Grade 1 severity | 20 Participants |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Renal Cell Carcinoma (First Line) | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with Treatment-Related TEAEs | 51 Participants |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Renal Cell Carcinoma (First Line) | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with Grade 5 severity | 0 Participants |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Renal Cell Carcinoma (Second Line) | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with Grade 2 severity | 9 Participants |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Renal Cell Carcinoma (Second Line) | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with Grade 3 severity | 1 Participants |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Renal Cell Carcinoma (Second Line) | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with Grade 4 severity | 0 Participants |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Renal Cell Carcinoma (Second Line) | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with Grade 1 severity | 4 Participants |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Renal Cell Carcinoma (Second Line) | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with Grade 5 severity | 0 Participants |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Renal Cell Carcinoma (Second Line) | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with Treatment-Related TEAEs | 14 Participants |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Renal Cell Carcinoma (Second Line) | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with missing Grade | 0 Participants |
| Efficacy Expansion Cohort: Ovarian Cancer | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with Treatment-Related TEAEs | 65 Participants |
| Efficacy Expansion Cohort: Ovarian Cancer | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with Grade 5 severity | 0 Participants |
| Efficacy Expansion Cohort: Ovarian Cancer | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with Grade 4 severity | 1 Participants |
| Efficacy Expansion Cohort: Ovarian Cancer | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with Grade 2 severity | 26 Participants |
| Efficacy Expansion Cohort: Ovarian Cancer | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with Grade 1 severity | 30 Participants |
| Efficacy Expansion Cohort: Ovarian Cancer | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with Grade 3 severity | 8 Participants |
| Efficacy Expansion Cohort: Ovarian Cancer | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with missing Grade | 0 Participants |
| Efficacy Expansion Cohort: Urothelial Carcinoma | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with Grade 1 severity | 50 Participants |
| Efficacy Expansion Cohort: Urothelial Carcinoma | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with Grade 4 severity | 3 Participants |
| Efficacy Expansion Cohort: Urothelial Carcinoma | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with Grade 5 severity | 1 Participants |
| Efficacy Expansion Cohort: Urothelial Carcinoma | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with Treatment-Related TEAEs | 144 Participants |
| Efficacy Expansion Cohort: Urothelial Carcinoma | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with Grade 2 severity | 70 Participants |
| Efficacy Expansion Cohort: Urothelial Carcinoma | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with Grade 3 severity | 20 Participants |
| Efficacy Expansion Cohort: Urothelial Carcinoma | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with missing Grade | 0 Participants |
| Efficacy Expansion Cohort: GC/GEJC, Third Line | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with Grade 2 severity | 33 Participants |
| Efficacy Expansion Cohort: GC/GEJC, Third Line | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with Treatment-Related TEAEs | 71 Participants |
| Efficacy Expansion Cohort: GC/GEJC, Third Line | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with Grade 3 severity | 11 Participants |
| Efficacy Expansion Cohort: GC/GEJC, Third Line | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with missing Grade | 0 Participants |
| Efficacy Expansion Cohort: GC/GEJC, Third Line | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with Grade 1 severity | 25 Participants |
| Efficacy Expansion Cohort: GC/GEJC, Third Line | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with Grade 4 severity | 1 Participants |
| Efficacy Expansion Cohort: GC/GEJC, Third Line | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with Grade 5 severity | 1 Participants |
| Efficacy Expansion Cohort: HNSCC | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with Grade 2 severity | 34 Participants |
| Efficacy Expansion Cohort: HNSCC | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with Grade 4 severity | 1 Participants |
| Efficacy Expansion Cohort: HNSCC | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with Grade 1 severity | 39 Participants |
| Efficacy Expansion Cohort: HNSCC | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with Grade 3 severity | 9 Participants |
| Efficacy Expansion Cohort: HNSCC | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with missing Grade | 0 Participants |
| Efficacy Expansion Cohort: HNSCC | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with Treatment-Related TEAEs | 83 Participants |
| Efficacy Expansion Cohort: HNSCC | Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per Severity | Participants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with Grade 5 severity | 0 Participants |
Dose Escalation Cohort (Excluding Once Weekly Avelumab 10 mg/kg Cohort): Apparent Terminal Half-Life (t1/2) of Avelumab
Apparent terminal half-life was defined as the time required for the serum concentration of drug to decrease 50 percent in the final stage of its elimination.
Time frame: Pre-infusion, at end of 1-hour infusion (Day 1), 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6,12, 24, 36, 48 hours after end of infusion
Population: Pharmacokinetic (PK) population included all participants who have completed at least 1 infusion of study drug, and who have provided sufficient concentration measurements. Here Overall number of participants analyzed signifies those who were evaluable for this outcome measure.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 1.0 mg/kg | Dose Escalation Cohort (Excluding Once Weekly Avelumab 10 mg/kg Cohort): Apparent Terminal Half-Life (t1/2) of Avelumab | 61.425 Hours |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 3.0 mg/kg | Dose Escalation Cohort (Excluding Once Weekly Avelumab 10 mg/kg Cohort): Apparent Terminal Half-Life (t1/2) of Avelumab | 89.064 Hours |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 10.0 mg/kg | Dose Escalation Cohort (Excluding Once Weekly Avelumab 10 mg/kg Cohort): Apparent Terminal Half-Life (t1/2) of Avelumab | 97.440 Hours |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 20.0 mg/kg | Dose Escalation Cohort (Excluding Once Weekly Avelumab 10 mg/kg Cohort): Apparent Terminal Half-Life (t1/2) of Avelumab | 108.671 Hours |
Dose Escalation Cohort (Excluding Once Weekly Avelumab 10 mg/kg Cohort): Area Under Serum Concentration-Time Curve From the Time of Dosing to the Time of the Last Observation (AUC0-t) of Avelumab
Area under the serum concentration versus time curve from time zero to the last sampling time t at which the concentration is at or above the lower limit of quantification (LLLQ). AUC(0-t) was calculated according to the mixed log-linear trapezoidal rule.
Time frame: Pre-infusion, at end of 1-hour infusion (Day 1), 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6,12, 24, 36, 48 hours after end of infusion
Population: Pharmacokinetic (PK) population included all participants who have completed at least 1 infusion of study drug, and who have provided sufficient concentration measurements.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 1.0 mg/kg | Dose Escalation Cohort (Excluding Once Weekly Avelumab 10 mg/kg Cohort): Area Under Serum Concentration-Time Curve From the Time of Dosing to the Time of the Last Observation (AUC0-t) of Avelumab | 1040 Hours*micrograms per milliliter | Standard Deviation 443 |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 3.0 mg/kg | Dose Escalation Cohort (Excluding Once Weekly Avelumab 10 mg/kg Cohort): Area Under Serum Concentration-Time Curve From the Time of Dosing to the Time of the Last Observation (AUC0-t) of Avelumab | 6080 Hours*micrograms per milliliter | Standard Deviation 1970 |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 10.0 mg/kg | Dose Escalation Cohort (Excluding Once Weekly Avelumab 10 mg/kg Cohort): Area Under Serum Concentration-Time Curve From the Time of Dosing to the Time of the Last Observation (AUC0-t) of Avelumab | 22749.4 Hours*micrograms per milliliter | Standard Deviation 7857.09 |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 20.0 mg/kg | Dose Escalation Cohort (Excluding Once Weekly Avelumab 10 mg/kg Cohort): Area Under Serum Concentration-Time Curve From the Time of Dosing to the Time of the Last Observation (AUC0-t) of Avelumab | 45100 Hours*micrograms per milliliter | Standard Deviation 15600 |
Dose Escalation Cohort (Excluding Once Weekly Avelumab 10 mg/kg Cohort): Area Under the Serum Concentration-Time Curve From Time Zero to Infinity (AUC0-infinity) of Avelumab
The AUC(0-inf) was estimated by determining the total area under the curve of the concentration versus time curve extrapolated to infinity.
Time frame: Pre-infusion, at end of 1-hour infusion (Day 1), 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6,12, 24, 36, 48 hours after end of infusion
Population: Pharmacokinetic (PK) population included all participants who have completed at least 1 infusion of study drug, and who have provided sufficient concentration measurements. Here Overall number of participants analyzed signifies those who were evaluable for this outcome measure.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 1.0 mg/kg | Dose Escalation Cohort (Excluding Once Weekly Avelumab 10 mg/kg Cohort): Area Under the Serum Concentration-Time Curve From Time Zero to Infinity (AUC0-infinity) of Avelumab | 1290 Hours*micrograms per milliliter | Standard Deviation 650 |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 3.0 mg/kg | Dose Escalation Cohort (Excluding Once Weekly Avelumab 10 mg/kg Cohort): Area Under the Serum Concentration-Time Curve From Time Zero to Infinity (AUC0-infinity) of Avelumab | 6850 Hours*micrograms per milliliter | Standard Deviation 2100 |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 10.0 mg/kg | Dose Escalation Cohort (Excluding Once Weekly Avelumab 10 mg/kg Cohort): Area Under the Serum Concentration-Time Curve From Time Zero to Infinity (AUC0-infinity) of Avelumab | 25920.9 Hours*micrograms per milliliter | Standard Deviation 6753.76 |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 20.0 mg/kg | Dose Escalation Cohort (Excluding Once Weekly Avelumab 10 mg/kg Cohort): Area Under the Serum Concentration-Time Curve From Time Zero to Infinity (AUC0-infinity) of Avelumab | 46600 Hours*micrograms per milliliter | Standard Deviation 18500 |
Dose Escalation Cohort (Excluding Once Weekly Avelumab 10 mg/kg Cohort): Maximum Observed Serum Concentration (Cmax) of Avelumab
Cmax is the maximum observed serum concentration obtained directly from the concentration versus time curve.
Time frame: Pre-infusion, at end of 1-hour infusion (Day 1), 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6,12, 24, 36, 48 hours after end of infusion
Population: Pharmacokinetic (PK) population included all participants who have completed at least 1 infusion of study drug, and who have provided sufficient concentration measurements.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 1.0 mg/kg | Dose Escalation Cohort (Excluding Once Weekly Avelumab 10 mg/kg Cohort): Maximum Observed Serum Concentration (Cmax) of Avelumab | 18.7 Micrograms per milliliter (mcg/mL) | Standard Deviation 3.96 |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 3.0 mg/kg | Dose Escalation Cohort (Excluding Once Weekly Avelumab 10 mg/kg Cohort): Maximum Observed Serum Concentration (Cmax) of Avelumab | 81.9 Micrograms per milliliter (mcg/mL) | Standard Deviation 22.1 |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 10.0 mg/kg | Dose Escalation Cohort (Excluding Once Weekly Avelumab 10 mg/kg Cohort): Maximum Observed Serum Concentration (Cmax) of Avelumab | 249.048 Micrograms per milliliter (mcg/mL) | Standard Deviation 55.4697 |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 20.0 mg/kg | Dose Escalation Cohort (Excluding Once Weekly Avelumab 10 mg/kg Cohort): Maximum Observed Serum Concentration (Cmax) of Avelumab | 489 Micrograms per milliliter (mcg/mL) | Standard Deviation 140 |
Dose Escalation Cohort (Excluding Once Weekly Avelumab 10 mg/kg Cohort): Number of Participants With at Least 1 Positive Anti Drug Antibodies (ADA)
Serum samples were analyzed by a validated electrochemiluminescence immunoassay to detect the presence of antidrug antibodies (ADA). Number of participants with ADA positive results for Avelumab were reported.
Time frame: Dose Escalation: Baseline up to Day 1023
Population: Safety analysis set included all participants who have received at least 1 dose of study treatment. Here Overall number of participants analyzed signifies those who were evaluable for this outcome measure.
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 1.0 mg/kg | Dose Escalation Cohort (Excluding Once Weekly Avelumab 10 mg/kg Cohort): Number of Participants With at Least 1 Positive Anti Drug Antibodies (ADA) | 0 Participants |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 3.0 mg/kg | Dose Escalation Cohort (Excluding Once Weekly Avelumab 10 mg/kg Cohort): Number of Participants With at Least 1 Positive Anti Drug Antibodies (ADA) | 2 Participants |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 10.0 mg/kg | Dose Escalation Cohort (Excluding Once Weekly Avelumab 10 mg/kg Cohort): Number of Participants With at Least 1 Positive Anti Drug Antibodies (ADA) | 0 Participants |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 20.0 mg/kg | Dose Escalation Cohort (Excluding Once Weekly Avelumab 10 mg/kg Cohort): Number of Participants With at Least 1 Positive Anti Drug Antibodies (ADA) | 0 Participants |
Dose Escalation Cohort (Excluding Once Weekly Avelumab 10 mg/kg Cohort): Number of Participants With Immune Related Best Overall Response (irBOR) According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC)
irBOR defined as best response of any of immune related complete response (irCR), immune related partial response (irPR), immune related stable disease (irSD) and immune related progressive disease (irPD) recorded from baseline until immune related disease progression and determined according to modified irRC per investigator assessment. irCR: Complete disappearance of all tumor lesions (both index and non-index lesions with no new measurable/unmeasurable lesions). irPR: At least 30% reduction from baseline in the sum of the longest diameter (SLD) of all lesions). irSD: SLD of target and new measurable lesions neither irCR, irPR, or irPD. irPD: SLD of target and new measurable lesions increases greater than or equal to \[\>=\] 20%, confirmed by a repeat, consecutive observations at least 4 weeks from the date first documented. Number of participants with immune-related best overall response in each category (irCR, irPR, irSD, irPD) was reported.
Time frame: Dose Escalation: Baseline up to Day 1023
Population: Safety analysis set included all participants who have received at least 1 dose of study treatment.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 1.0 mg/kg | Dose Escalation Cohort (Excluding Once Weekly Avelumab 10 mg/kg Cohort): Number of Participants With Immune Related Best Overall Response (irBOR) According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC) | Immune-related Stable Disease | 2 Participants |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 1.0 mg/kg | Dose Escalation Cohort (Excluding Once Weekly Avelumab 10 mg/kg Cohort): Number of Participants With Immune Related Best Overall Response (irBOR) According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC) | Immune-related Progressive Disease | 0 Participants |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 1.0 mg/kg | Dose Escalation Cohort (Excluding Once Weekly Avelumab 10 mg/kg Cohort): Number of Participants With Immune Related Best Overall Response (irBOR) According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC) | Not Evaluable | 2 Participants |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 1.0 mg/kg | Dose Escalation Cohort (Excluding Once Weekly Avelumab 10 mg/kg Cohort): Number of Participants With Immune Related Best Overall Response (irBOR) According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC) | Immune-related Partial Response | 0 Participants |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 1.0 mg/kg | Dose Escalation Cohort (Excluding Once Weekly Avelumab 10 mg/kg Cohort): Number of Participants With Immune Related Best Overall Response (irBOR) According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC) | Immune-related Complete Response | 0 Participants |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 3.0 mg/kg | Dose Escalation Cohort (Excluding Once Weekly Avelumab 10 mg/kg Cohort): Number of Participants With Immune Related Best Overall Response (irBOR) According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC) | Immune-related Partial Response | 0 Participants |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 3.0 mg/kg | Dose Escalation Cohort (Excluding Once Weekly Avelumab 10 mg/kg Cohort): Number of Participants With Immune Related Best Overall Response (irBOR) According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC) | Immune-related Stable Disease | 8 Participants |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 3.0 mg/kg | Dose Escalation Cohort (Excluding Once Weekly Avelumab 10 mg/kg Cohort): Number of Participants With Immune Related Best Overall Response (irBOR) According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC) | Immune-related Complete Response | 0 Participants |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 3.0 mg/kg | Dose Escalation Cohort (Excluding Once Weekly Avelumab 10 mg/kg Cohort): Number of Participants With Immune Related Best Overall Response (irBOR) According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC) | Immune-related Progressive Disease | 5 Participants |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 3.0 mg/kg | Dose Escalation Cohort (Excluding Once Weekly Avelumab 10 mg/kg Cohort): Number of Participants With Immune Related Best Overall Response (irBOR) According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC) | Not Evaluable | 0 Participants |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 10.0 mg/kg | Dose Escalation Cohort (Excluding Once Weekly Avelumab 10 mg/kg Cohort): Number of Participants With Immune Related Best Overall Response (irBOR) According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC) | Not Evaluable | 2 Participants |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 10.0 mg/kg | Dose Escalation Cohort (Excluding Once Weekly Avelumab 10 mg/kg Cohort): Number of Participants With Immune Related Best Overall Response (irBOR) According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC) | Immune-related Complete Response | 0 Participants |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 10.0 mg/kg | Dose Escalation Cohort (Excluding Once Weekly Avelumab 10 mg/kg Cohort): Number of Participants With Immune Related Best Overall Response (irBOR) According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC) | Immune-related Partial Response | 1 Participants |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 10.0 mg/kg | Dose Escalation Cohort (Excluding Once Weekly Avelumab 10 mg/kg Cohort): Number of Participants With Immune Related Best Overall Response (irBOR) According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC) | Immune-related Stable Disease | 8 Participants |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 10.0 mg/kg | Dose Escalation Cohort (Excluding Once Weekly Avelumab 10 mg/kg Cohort): Number of Participants With Immune Related Best Overall Response (irBOR) According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC) | Immune-related Progressive Disease | 4 Participants |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 20.0 mg/kg | Dose Escalation Cohort (Excluding Once Weekly Avelumab 10 mg/kg Cohort): Number of Participants With Immune Related Best Overall Response (irBOR) According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC) | Immune-related Partial Response | 1 Participants |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 20.0 mg/kg | Dose Escalation Cohort (Excluding Once Weekly Avelumab 10 mg/kg Cohort): Number of Participants With Immune Related Best Overall Response (irBOR) According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC) | Immune-related Progressive Disease | 1 Participants |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 20.0 mg/kg | Dose Escalation Cohort (Excluding Once Weekly Avelumab 10 mg/kg Cohort): Number of Participants With Immune Related Best Overall Response (irBOR) According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC) | Immune-related Complete Response | 0 Participants |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 20.0 mg/kg | Dose Escalation Cohort (Excluding Once Weekly Avelumab 10 mg/kg Cohort): Number of Participants With Immune Related Best Overall Response (irBOR) According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC) | Not Evaluable | 5 Participants |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 20.0 mg/kg | Dose Escalation Cohort (Excluding Once Weekly Avelumab 10 mg/kg Cohort): Number of Participants With Immune Related Best Overall Response (irBOR) According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC) | Immune-related Stable Disease | 14 Participants |
Dose Escalation Cohort (Excluding Once Weekly Avelumab 10 mg/kg Cohort): Programmed Death Ligand 1 (PD-L1) Receptor Occupancy
Percentage of PD-L1 receptors occupied by avelumab on human lymphocytes (CD3+ T-cells) was assessed by flow cytometry on peripheral blood mononuclear cell (PBMC) samples. Greater than or equal to \[\>=\] 85 percent \[%\] of cell viability was required for reliable receptor occupancy assessment.
Time frame: Pre-infusion on Day 1; 48 hours after infusion on Day 3; Pre-infusion on Days 15, 43, and 85
Population: Safety analysis set included all participants who have received at least 1 dose of study treatment. Here Overall number of participants analyzed signifies those who were evaluable for this outcome measure and number analyzed signifies those who were evaluable for this outcome measure at specified time points.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 1.0 mg/kg | Dose Escalation Cohort (Excluding Once Weekly Avelumab 10 mg/kg Cohort): Programmed Death Ligand 1 (PD-L1) Receptor Occupancy | Day 85 | 19.8 Percentage of receptors | — |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 1.0 mg/kg | Dose Escalation Cohort (Excluding Once Weekly Avelumab 10 mg/kg Cohort): Programmed Death Ligand 1 (PD-L1) Receptor Occupancy | Day 3 | 92.5 Percentage of receptors | Standard Deviation 1.99 |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 1.0 mg/kg | Dose Escalation Cohort (Excluding Once Weekly Avelumab 10 mg/kg Cohort): Programmed Death Ligand 1 (PD-L1) Receptor Occupancy | Day 15 | 75.7 Percentage of receptors | Standard Deviation 22.12 |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 1.0 mg/kg | Dose Escalation Cohort (Excluding Once Weekly Avelumab 10 mg/kg Cohort): Programmed Death Ligand 1 (PD-L1) Receptor Occupancy | Day 43 | 30.3 Percentage of receptors | — |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 3.0 mg/kg | Dose Escalation Cohort (Excluding Once Weekly Avelumab 10 mg/kg Cohort): Programmed Death Ligand 1 (PD-L1) Receptor Occupancy | Day 3 | 80.1 Percentage of receptors | Standard Deviation 14.43 |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 3.0 mg/kg | Dose Escalation Cohort (Excluding Once Weekly Avelumab 10 mg/kg Cohort): Programmed Death Ligand 1 (PD-L1) Receptor Occupancy | Day 43 | 96.8 Percentage of receptors | — |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 3.0 mg/kg | Dose Escalation Cohort (Excluding Once Weekly Avelumab 10 mg/kg Cohort): Programmed Death Ligand 1 (PD-L1) Receptor Occupancy | Day 1 | 0.0 Percentage of receptors | Standard Deviation 0 |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 3.0 mg/kg | Dose Escalation Cohort (Excluding Once Weekly Avelumab 10 mg/kg Cohort): Programmed Death Ligand 1 (PD-L1) Receptor Occupancy | Day 15 | 90.0 Percentage of receptors | Standard Deviation 8.11 |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 10.0 mg/kg | Dose Escalation Cohort (Excluding Once Weekly Avelumab 10 mg/kg Cohort): Programmed Death Ligand 1 (PD-L1) Receptor Occupancy | Day 15 | 93.2 Percentage of receptors | Standard Deviation 1.29 |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 20.0 mg/kg | Dose Escalation Cohort (Excluding Once Weekly Avelumab 10 mg/kg Cohort): Programmed Death Ligand 1 (PD-L1) Receptor Occupancy | Day 1 | 0.0 Percentage of receptors | Standard Deviation 0 |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 20.0 mg/kg | Dose Escalation Cohort (Excluding Once Weekly Avelumab 10 mg/kg Cohort): Programmed Death Ligand 1 (PD-L1) Receptor Occupancy | Day 3 | 84.7 Percentage of receptors | Standard Deviation 12.83 |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 20.0 mg/kg | Dose Escalation Cohort (Excluding Once Weekly Avelumab 10 mg/kg Cohort): Programmed Death Ligand 1 (PD-L1) Receptor Occupancy | Day 15 | 85.0 Percentage of receptors | Standard Deviation 8.73 |
Dose Escalation Cohort (Excluding Once Weekly Avelumab 10 mg/kg Cohort): Time to Reach Maximum Observed Serum Concentration (Tmax) of Avelumab
Tmax is time to reach maximum observed serum concentration obtained directly from the concentration versus time curve.
Time frame: Pre-infusion, at end of 1-hour infusion (Day 1), 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6,12, 24, 36, 48 hours after end of infusion
Population: Pharmacokinetic (PK) population included all participants who have completed at least 1 infusion of study drug, and who have provided sufficient concentration measurements.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 1.0 mg/kg | Dose Escalation Cohort (Excluding Once Weekly Avelumab 10 mg/kg Cohort): Time to Reach Maximum Observed Serum Concentration (Tmax) of Avelumab | 1.500 Hours |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 3.0 mg/kg | Dose Escalation Cohort (Excluding Once Weekly Avelumab 10 mg/kg Cohort): Time to Reach Maximum Observed Serum Concentration (Tmax) of Avelumab | 1.500 Hours |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 10.0 mg/kg | Dose Escalation Cohort (Excluding Once Weekly Avelumab 10 mg/kg Cohort): Time to Reach Maximum Observed Serum Concentration (Tmax) of Avelumab | 1.500 Hours |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 20.0 mg/kg | Dose Escalation Cohort (Excluding Once Weekly Avelumab 10 mg/kg Cohort): Time to Reach Maximum Observed Serum Concentration (Tmax) of Avelumab | 1.717 Hours |
Dose Escalation Cohort: Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1
BOR was determined according to RECIST v1.1 and as per investigator assessment. BOR is defined as the best response of any of complete response (CR), partial response (PR), stable disease (SD) and progressive disease (PD) recorded from date of randomization until disease progression or recurrence (taking the smallest measurement recorded since start of treatment as reference). CR: Disappearance of all evidence of target and non-target lesions. PR: At least 30 percent (%) reduction from baseline in the sum of the longest diameter (SLD) of all lesions. SD =Neither sufficient increase to qualify for PD nor sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR. PD is defined as at least a 20 % increase in the SLD, taking as reference the smallest SLD recorded from baseline or appearance of 1 or more new lesions and unequivocal progression of non-target lesions. Number of participants with best overall response in each category (CR, PR, SD, PD) was reported.
Time frame: Dose Escalation: Baseline up to Day 2511
Population: Safety analysis set included all participants who have received at least 1 dose of study treatment.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 1.0 mg/kg | Dose Escalation Cohort: Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 | Partial Response | 0 Participants |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 1.0 mg/kg | Dose Escalation Cohort: Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 | Stable Disease | 2 Participants |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 1.0 mg/kg | Dose Escalation Cohort: Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 | Complete Response | 0 Participants |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 1.0 mg/kg | Dose Escalation Cohort: Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 | Not Evaluable | 2 Participants |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 1.0 mg/kg | Dose Escalation Cohort: Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 | Progressive Disease | 0 Participants |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 3.0 mg/kg | Dose Escalation Cohort: Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 | Stable Disease | 8 Participants |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 3.0 mg/kg | Dose Escalation Cohort: Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 | Complete Response | 0 Participants |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 3.0 mg/kg | Dose Escalation Cohort: Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 | Partial Response | 0 Participants |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 3.0 mg/kg | Dose Escalation Cohort: Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 | Progressive Disease | 5 Participants |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 3.0 mg/kg | Dose Escalation Cohort: Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 | Not Evaluable | 0 Participants |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 10.0 mg/kg | Dose Escalation Cohort: Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 | Not Evaluable | 2 Participants |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 10.0 mg/kg | Dose Escalation Cohort: Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 | Complete Response | 0 Participants |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 10.0 mg/kg | Dose Escalation Cohort: Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 | Stable Disease | 8 Participants |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 10.0 mg/kg | Dose Escalation Cohort: Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 | Progressive Disease | 4 Participants |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 10.0 mg/kg | Dose Escalation Cohort: Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 | Partial Response | 1 Participants |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 20.0 mg/kg | Dose Escalation Cohort: Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 | Partial Response | 1 Participants |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 20.0 mg/kg | Dose Escalation Cohort: Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 | Complete Response | 0 Participants |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 20.0 mg/kg | Dose Escalation Cohort: Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 | Stable Disease | 14 Participants |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 20.0 mg/kg | Dose Escalation Cohort: Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 | Not Evaluable | 3 Participants |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 20.0 mg/kg | Dose Escalation Cohort: Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 | Progressive Disease | 3 Participants |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 10.0 mg/kg Weekly | Dose Escalation Cohort: Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 | Progressive Disease | 1 Participants |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 10.0 mg/kg Weekly | Dose Escalation Cohort: Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 | Stable Disease | 4 Participants |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 10.0 mg/kg Weekly | Dose Escalation Cohort: Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 | Not Evaluable | 2 Participants |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 10.0 mg/kg Weekly | Dose Escalation Cohort: Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 | Complete Response | 0 Participants |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 10.0 mg/kg Weekly | Dose Escalation Cohort: Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 | Partial Response | 1 Participants |
Dose Expansion Cohort: Duration of Response According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC) Per Investigator Assessment
Duration of response according to modified irRC, per investigator assessment was calculated for each participant with a confirmed response (immune-related complete response \[irCR\] or immune-related partial response \[irPR\]) as the time from the first observation of response to the first observation of documented disease progression (or death within 12 weeks of the last tumor assessment). irCR: Complete disappearance of all tumor lesions (both index and non-index lesions with no new measurable/unmeasurable lesions). irPR: At least 30% reduction from baseline in the sum of the longest diameter (SLD) of all lesions). Results were calculated based on Kaplan-Meier estimates.
Time frame: Dose Expansion: Baseline up to Day 2023
Population: FAS included all participants who have received at least 1 dose of study treatment. Data for this outcome measure is reported for the participants with Complete or Partial response.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 1.0 mg/kg | Dose Expansion Cohort: Duration of Response According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC) Per Investigator Assessment | 21.13 Months |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 3.0 mg/kg | Dose Expansion Cohort: Duration of Response According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC) Per Investigator Assessment | NA Months |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 10.0 mg/kg | Dose Expansion Cohort: Duration of Response According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC) Per Investigator Assessment | 8.31 Months |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 20.0 mg/kg | Dose Expansion Cohort: Duration of Response According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC) Per Investigator Assessment | 4.14 Months |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 10.0 mg/kg Weekly | Dose Expansion Cohort: Duration of Response According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC) Per Investigator Assessment | 22.23 Months |
| Primary Expansion Cohort: Metastatic Breast Cancer | Dose Expansion Cohort: Duration of Response According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC) Per Investigator Assessment | NA Months |
| Primary Expansion Cohort: GC/GEJC Progressed | Dose Expansion Cohort: Duration of Response According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC) Per Investigator Assessment | NA Months |
| Primary Expansion Cohort: GC/GEJC Non Progressed | Dose Expansion Cohort: Duration of Response According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC) Per Investigator Assessment | 15.21 Months |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Colorectal Cancer | Dose Expansion Cohort: Duration of Response According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC) Per Investigator Assessment | NA Months |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Castrate-resistant Prostate Cancer | Dose Expansion Cohort: Duration of Response According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC) Per Investigator Assessment | NA Months |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Adrenocortical Carcinoma | Dose Expansion Cohort: Duration of Response According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC) Per Investigator Assessment | 10.61 Months |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Melanoma | Dose Expansion Cohort: Duration of Response According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC) Per Investigator Assessment | NA Months |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Mesothelioma | Dose Expansion Cohort: Duration of Response According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC) Per Investigator Assessment | NA Months |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Urothelial Carcinoma | Dose Expansion Cohort: Duration of Response According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC) Per Investigator Assessment | NA Months |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Ovarian Cancer | Dose Expansion Cohort: Duration of Response According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC) Per Investigator Assessment | NA Months |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Renal Cell Carcinoma (First Line) | Dose Expansion Cohort: Duration of Response According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC) Per Investigator Assessment | NA Months |
Dose Expansion Cohort: Duration of Response According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 Per Investigator Assessment
Duration of response according to RECIST 1.1, per investigator assessment was calculated for each participant with a confirmed response (complete response \[CR\] or partial response \[PR\]) as the time from the first observation of response to the first observation of documented disease progression (or death within 12 weeks of the last tumor assessment). CR: Disappearance of all evidence of target and non-target lesions. PR: At least 30 percent (%) reduction from baseline in the sum of the longest diameter (SLD) of all lesions. Results were calculated based on Kaplan-Meier estimates.
Time frame: Dose Expansion: Baseline up to Day 2023
Population: FAS included all participants who have received at least 1 dose of study treatment. Data for this outcome measure is reported for the participants with Complete or Partial response.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 1.0 mg/kg | Dose Expansion Cohort: Duration of Response According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 Per Investigator Assessment | 17.48 Months |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 3.0 mg/kg | Dose Expansion Cohort: Duration of Response According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 Per Investigator Assessment | 12.02 Months |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 10.0 mg/kg | Dose Expansion Cohort: Duration of Response According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 Per Investigator Assessment | 8.33 Months |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 20.0 mg/kg | Dose Expansion Cohort: Duration of Response According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 Per Investigator Assessment | 3.48 Months |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 10.0 mg/kg Weekly | Dose Expansion Cohort: Duration of Response According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 Per Investigator Assessment | 21.42 Months |
| Primary Expansion Cohort: Metastatic Breast Cancer | Dose Expansion Cohort: Duration of Response According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 Per Investigator Assessment | 8.41 Months |
| Primary Expansion Cohort: GC/GEJC Progressed | Dose Expansion Cohort: Duration of Response According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 Per Investigator Assessment | NA Months |
| Primary Expansion Cohort: GC/GEJC Non Progressed | Dose Expansion Cohort: Duration of Response According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 Per Investigator Assessment | 15.21 Months |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Colorectal Cancer | Dose Expansion Cohort: Duration of Response According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 Per Investigator Assessment | NA Months |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Castrate-resistant Prostate Cancer | Dose Expansion Cohort: Duration of Response According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 Per Investigator Assessment | 10.38 Months |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Adrenocortical Carcinoma | Dose Expansion Cohort: Duration of Response According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 Per Investigator Assessment | 9.94 Months |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Melanoma | Dose Expansion Cohort: Duration of Response According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 Per Investigator Assessment | NA Months |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Mesothelioma | Dose Expansion Cohort: Duration of Response According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 Per Investigator Assessment | NA Months |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Urothelial Carcinoma | Dose Expansion Cohort: Duration of Response According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 Per Investigator Assessment | NA Months |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Ovarian Cancer | Dose Expansion Cohort: Duration of Response According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 Per Investigator Assessment | NA Months |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Renal Cell Carcinoma (First Line) | Dose Expansion Cohort: Duration of Response According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 Per Investigator Assessment | NA Months |
Dose Expansion Cohort: Immune Related Progression-Free Survival (irPFS) Time According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC)
The irPFS time was defined as the time from first administration of study treatment until first documentation of immune-related progressive disease (irPD) or death when death occurred within 12 weeks of the last tumor assessment or first administration of study treatment (whichever was later). irPD: sum of the longest diameters of target and new measurable lesions increases greater than or equal to \[\>=\] 20%, confirmed by a repeat, consecutive observations at least 4 weeks from the date first documented. The analysis of irPFS will be performed with a Kaplan-Meier method. Data for immune related progression-free survival time has been reported.
Time frame: Dose Expansion: Baseline up to Day 2023
Population: FAS included all participants who have received at least 1 dose of study treatment. Here Overall Number of Participants Analyzed signifies those participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 1.0 mg/kg | Dose Expansion Cohort: Immune Related Progression-Free Survival (irPFS) Time According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC) | 4.04 Months |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 3.0 mg/kg | Dose Expansion Cohort: Immune Related Progression-Free Survival (irPFS) Time According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC) | 6.93 Months |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 10.0 mg/kg | Dose Expansion Cohort: Immune Related Progression-Free Survival (irPFS) Time According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC) | 1.64 Months |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 20.0 mg/kg | Dose Expansion Cohort: Immune Related Progression-Free Survival (irPFS) Time According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC) | 1.81 Months |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 10.0 mg/kg Weekly | Dose Expansion Cohort: Immune Related Progression-Free Survival (irPFS) Time According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC) | 4.14 Months |
| Primary Expansion Cohort: NSCLC, Post-platinum Doublet | Dose Expansion Cohort: Immune Related Progression-Free Survival (irPFS) Time According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC) | 2.79 Months |
| Primary Expansion Cohort: NSCLC, First Line | Dose Expansion Cohort: Immune Related Progression-Free Survival (irPFS) Time According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC) | NA Months |
| Primary Expansion Cohort: Metastatic Breast Cancer | Dose Expansion Cohort: Immune Related Progression-Free Survival (irPFS) Time According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC) | 3.81 Months |
| Primary Expansion Cohort: GC/GEJC Progressed | Dose Expansion Cohort: Immune Related Progression-Free Survival (irPFS) Time According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC) | 6.83 Months |
| Primary Expansion Cohort: GC/GEJC Non Progressed | Dose Expansion Cohort: Immune Related Progression-Free Survival (irPFS) Time According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC) | 6.18 Months |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Colorectal Cancer | Dose Expansion Cohort: Immune Related Progression-Free Survival (irPFS) Time According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC) | 4.07 Months |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Castrate-resistant Prostate Cancer | Dose Expansion Cohort: Immune Related Progression-Free Survival (irPFS) Time According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC) | 4.04 Months |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Adrenocortical Carcinoma | Dose Expansion Cohort: Immune Related Progression-Free Survival (irPFS) Time According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC) | 8.34 Months |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Melanoma | Dose Expansion Cohort: Immune Related Progression-Free Survival (irPFS) Time According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC) | 6.90 Months |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Mesothelioma | Dose Expansion Cohort: Immune Related Progression-Free Survival (irPFS) Time According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC) | 2.60 Months |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Urothelial Carcinoma | Dose Expansion Cohort: Immune Related Progression-Free Survival (irPFS) Time According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC) | 2.46 Months |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Ovarian Cancer | Dose Expansion Cohort: Immune Related Progression-Free Survival (irPFS) Time According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC) | 1.35 Months |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Renal Cell Carcinoma (First Line) | Dose Expansion Cohort: Immune Related Progression-Free Survival (irPFS) Time According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC) | 2.83 Months |
Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Atleast 1 Positive Anti Drug Antibodies (ADA) Assay
Serum samples were analyzed by a validated electrochemiluminescence immunoassay to detect the presence of antidrug antibodies (ADA). Number of participants with ADA positive results for Avelumab were reported.
Time frame: Dose Expansion: Baseline up to Day 2023
Population: Safety analysis set included all participants who have received at least 1 dose of study treatment. Here Overall number of participants analyzed signifies those who were evaluable for this outcome measure.
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 1.0 mg/kg | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Atleast 1 Positive Anti Drug Antibodies (ADA) Assay | 17 Participants |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 3.0 mg/kg | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Atleast 1 Positive Anti Drug Antibodies (ADA) Assay | 9 Participants |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 10.0 mg/kg | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Atleast 1 Positive Anti Drug Antibodies (ADA) Assay | 17 Participants |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 20.0 mg/kg | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Atleast 1 Positive Anti Drug Antibodies (ADA) Assay | 3 Participants |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 10.0 mg/kg Weekly | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Atleast 1 Positive Anti Drug Antibodies (ADA) Assay | 6 Participants |
| Primary Expansion Cohort: NSCLC, Post-platinum Doublet | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Atleast 1 Positive Anti Drug Antibodies (ADA) Assay | 0 Participants |
| Primary Expansion Cohort: NSCLC, First Line | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Atleast 1 Positive Anti Drug Antibodies (ADA) Assay | 0 Participants |
| Primary Expansion Cohort: Metastatic Breast Cancer | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Atleast 1 Positive Anti Drug Antibodies (ADA) Assay | 4 Participants |
| Primary Expansion Cohort: GC/GEJC Progressed | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Atleast 1 Positive Anti Drug Antibodies (ADA) Assay | 5 Participants |
| Primary Expansion Cohort: GC/GEJC Non Progressed | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Atleast 1 Positive Anti Drug Antibodies (ADA) Assay | 3 Participants |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Colorectal Cancer | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Atleast 1 Positive Anti Drug Antibodies (ADA) Assay | 2 Participants |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Castrate-resistant Prostate Cancer | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Atleast 1 Positive Anti Drug Antibodies (ADA) Assay | 5 Participants |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Adrenocortical Carcinoma | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Atleast 1 Positive Anti Drug Antibodies (ADA) Assay | 5 Participants |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Melanoma | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Atleast 1 Positive Anti Drug Antibodies (ADA) Assay | 3 Participants |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Mesothelioma | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Atleast 1 Positive Anti Drug Antibodies (ADA) Assay | 5 Participants |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Urothelial Carcinoma | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Atleast 1 Positive Anti Drug Antibodies (ADA) Assay | 17 Participants |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Ovarian Cancer | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Atleast 1 Positive Anti Drug Antibodies (ADA) Assay | 6 Participants |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Renal Cell Carcinoma (First Line) | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Atleast 1 Positive Anti Drug Antibodies (ADA) Assay | 5 Participants |
Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1
BOR was determined according to RECIST v1.1 and as per investigator assessment. BOR is defined as the best response of any of complete response (CR), partial response (PR), stable disease (SD) and progressive disease (PD) recorded from date of randomization until disease progression or recurrence (taking the smallest measurement recorded since start of treatment as reference). CR: Disappearance of all evidence of target and non-target lesions. PR: At least 30 percent (%) reduction from baseline in the sum of the longest diameter (SLD) of all lesions. SD = Neither sufficient increase to qualify for PD nor sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR. PD is defined as at least a 20 % increase in the SLD, taking as reference the smallest SLD recorded from baseline or appearance of 1 or more new lesions and unequivocal progression of non-target lesions. Number of participants with best overall response in each category (CR, PR, SD, PD) was reported.
Time frame: Dose Expansion: Baseline up to Day 2023
Population: Full analysis set (FAS) included all participants who have received at least 1 dose of study treatment. Here Overall Number of Participants Analyzed signifies those participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 1.0 mg/kg | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 | Progressive Disease | 68 Participants |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 1.0 mg/kg | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 | Complete Response | 2 Participants |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 1.0 mg/kg | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 | Partial Response | 24 Participants |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 1.0 mg/kg | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 | Not Evaluable | 24 Participants |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 1.0 mg/kg | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 | Stable Disease | 66 Participants |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 3.0 mg/kg | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 | Complete Response | 3 Participants |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 3.0 mg/kg | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 | Progressive Disease | 40 Participants |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 3.0 mg/kg | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 | Stable Disease | 68 Participants |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 3.0 mg/kg | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 | Partial Response | 28 Participants |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 3.0 mg/kg | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 | Not Evaluable | 17 Participants |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 10.0 mg/kg | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 | Complete Response | 1 Participants |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 10.0 mg/kg | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 | Progressive Disease | 107 Participants |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 10.0 mg/kg | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 | Partial Response | 4 Participants |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 10.0 mg/kg | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 | Stable Disease | 41 Participants |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 10.0 mg/kg | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 | Not Evaluable | 15 Participants |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 20.0 mg/kg | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 | Complete Response | 0 Participants |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 20.0 mg/kg | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 | Progressive Disease | 36 Participants |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 20.0 mg/kg | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 | Not Evaluable | 7 Participants |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 20.0 mg/kg | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 | Partial Response | 4 Participants |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 20.0 mg/kg | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 | Stable Disease | 13 Participants |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 10.0 mg/kg Weekly | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 | Partial Response | 4 Participants |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 10.0 mg/kg Weekly | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 | Complete Response | 2 Participants |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 10.0 mg/kg Weekly | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 | Progressive Disease | 29 Participants |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 10.0 mg/kg Weekly | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 | Not Evaluable | 10 Participants |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 10.0 mg/kg Weekly | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 | Stable Disease | 45 Participants |
| Primary Expansion Cohort: NSCLC, Post-platinum Doublet | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 | Complete Response | 0 Participants |
| Primary Expansion Cohort: NSCLC, Post-platinum Doublet | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 | Partial Response | 0 Participants |
| Primary Expansion Cohort: NSCLC, Post-platinum Doublet | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 | Stable Disease | 9 Participants |
| Primary Expansion Cohort: NSCLC, Post-platinum Doublet | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 | Progressive Disease | 9 Participants |
| Primary Expansion Cohort: NSCLC, Post-platinum Doublet | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 | Not Evaluable | 3 Participants |
| Primary Expansion Cohort: NSCLC, First Line | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 | Progressive Disease | 5 Participants |
| Primary Expansion Cohort: NSCLC, First Line | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 | Not Evaluable | 3 Participants |
| Primary Expansion Cohort: NSCLC, First Line | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 | Complete Response | 0 Participants |
| Primary Expansion Cohort: NSCLC, First Line | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 | Partial Response | 0 Participants |
| Primary Expansion Cohort: NSCLC, First Line | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 | Stable Disease | 10 Participants |
| Primary Expansion Cohort: Metastatic Breast Cancer | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 | Complete Response | 0 Participants |
| Primary Expansion Cohort: Metastatic Breast Cancer | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 | Progressive Disease | 22 Participants |
| Primary Expansion Cohort: Metastatic Breast Cancer | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 | Stable Disease | 21 Participants |
| Primary Expansion Cohort: Metastatic Breast Cancer | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 | Not Evaluable | 4 Participants |
| Primary Expansion Cohort: Metastatic Breast Cancer | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 | Partial Response | 3 Participants |
| Primary Expansion Cohort: GC/GEJC Progressed | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 | Not Evaluable | 7 Participants |
| Primary Expansion Cohort: GC/GEJC Progressed | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 | Complete Response | 4 Participants |
| Primary Expansion Cohort: GC/GEJC Progressed | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 | Stable Disease | 16 Participants |
| Primary Expansion Cohort: GC/GEJC Progressed | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 | Progressive Disease | 17 Participants |
| Primary Expansion Cohort: GC/GEJC Progressed | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 | Partial Response | 7 Participants |
| Primary Expansion Cohort: GC/GEJC Non Progressed | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 | Complete Response | 1 Participants |
| Primary Expansion Cohort: GC/GEJC Non Progressed | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 | Stable Disease | 26 Participants |
| Primary Expansion Cohort: GC/GEJC Non Progressed | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 | Partial Response | 4 Participants |
| Primary Expansion Cohort: GC/GEJC Non Progressed | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 | Progressive Disease | 18 Participants |
| Primary Expansion Cohort: GC/GEJC Non Progressed | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 | Not Evaluable | 4 Participants |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Colorectal Cancer | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 | Not Evaluable | 4 Participants |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Colorectal Cancer | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 | Partial Response | 4 Participants |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Colorectal Cancer | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 | Progressive Disease | 14 Participants |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Colorectal Cancer | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 | Stable Disease | 20 Participants |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Colorectal Cancer | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 | Complete Response | 2 Participants |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Castrate-resistant Prostate Cancer | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 | Progressive Disease | 51 Participants |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Castrate-resistant Prostate Cancer | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 | Stable Disease | 53 Participants |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Castrate-resistant Prostate Cancer | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 | Partial Response | 11 Participants |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Castrate-resistant Prostate Cancer | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 | Complete Response | 1 Participants |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Castrate-resistant Prostate Cancer | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 | Not Evaluable | 9 Participants |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Adrenocortical Carcinoma | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 | Not Evaluable | 3 Participants |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Adrenocortical Carcinoma | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 | Complete Response | 1 Participants |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Adrenocortical Carcinoma | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 | Partial Response | 9 Participants |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Adrenocortical Carcinoma | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 | Stable Disease | 38 Participants |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Adrenocortical Carcinoma | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 | Progressive Disease | 11 Participants |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Melanoma | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 | Progressive Disease | 4 Participants |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Melanoma | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 | Complete Response | 0 Participants |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Melanoma | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 | Stable Disease | 13 Participants |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Melanoma | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 | Partial Response | 2 Participants |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Melanoma | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 | Not Evaluable | 1 Participants |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Mesothelioma | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 | Not Evaluable | 13 Participants |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Mesothelioma | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 | Complete Response | 3 Participants |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Mesothelioma | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 | Progressive Disease | 46 Participants |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Mesothelioma | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 | Partial Response | 4 Participants |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Mesothelioma | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 | Stable Disease | 37 Participants |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Urothelial Carcinoma | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 | Partial Response | 24 Participants |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Urothelial Carcinoma | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 | Not Evaluable | 35 Participants |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Urothelial Carcinoma | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 | Stable Disease | 45 Participants |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Urothelial Carcinoma | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 | Progressive Disease | 87 Participants |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Urothelial Carcinoma | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 | Complete Response | 7 Participants |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Ovarian Cancer | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 | Stable Disease | 23 Participants |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Ovarian Cancer | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 | Not Evaluable | 21 Participants |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Ovarian Cancer | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 | Progressive Disease | 80 Participants |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Ovarian Cancer | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 | Partial Response | 7 Participants |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Ovarian Cancer | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 | Complete Response | 1 Participants |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Renal Cell Carcinoma (First Line) | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 | Progressive Disease | 66 Participants |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Renal Cell Carcinoma (First Line) | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 | Partial Response | 15 Participants |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Renal Cell Carcinoma (First Line) | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 | Stable Disease | 50 Participants |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Renal Cell Carcinoma (First Line) | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 | Not Evaluable | 17 Participants |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Renal Cell Carcinoma (First Line) | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 | Complete Response | 5 Participants |
Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Immune Related Best Overall Response (irBOR) According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC)
irBOR defined as best response of any of immune related complete response (irCR), immune related partial response (irPR), immune related stable disease (irSD) and immune related progressive disease (irPD) recorded from baseline until immune related disease progression and determined according to modified irRC per investigator assessment. irCR: Complete disappearance of all tumor lesions (both index and non-index lesions with no new measurable/unmeasurable lesions). irPR: At least 30% reduction from baseline in the sum of the longest diameter (SLD) of all lesions). irSD: SLD of target and new measurable lesions neither irCR, irPR, or irPD. irPD: SLD of target and new measurable lesions increases greater than or equal to \[\>=\] 20%, confirmed by a repeat, consecutive observations at least 4 weeks from the date first documented. Number of participants with immune-related best overall response in each category (irCR, irPR, irSD, irPD) was reported.
Time frame: Dose Expansion: Baseline up to Day 2023
Population: Full analysis set (FAS) included all participants who have received at least 1 dose of study treatment. Here Overall Number of Participants Analyzed signifies those participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 1.0 mg/kg | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Immune Related Best Overall Response (irBOR) According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC) | Immune-related Complete Response | 2 Participants |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 1.0 mg/kg | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Immune Related Best Overall Response (irBOR) According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC) | Not Evaluable | 40 Participants |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 1.0 mg/kg | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Immune Related Best Overall Response (irBOR) According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC) | Immune-related Partial Response | 26 Participants |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 1.0 mg/kg | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Immune Related Best Overall Response (irBOR) According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC) | Immune-related Stable Disease | 80 Participants |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 1.0 mg/kg | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Immune Related Best Overall Response (irBOR) According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC) | Immune-related Progressive Disease | 36 Participants |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 3.0 mg/kg | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Immune Related Best Overall Response (irBOR) According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC) | Immune-related Progressive Disease | 21 Participants |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 3.0 mg/kg | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Immune Related Best Overall Response (irBOR) According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC) | Immune-related Stable Disease | 78 Participants |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 3.0 mg/kg | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Immune Related Best Overall Response (irBOR) According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC) | Immune-related Complete Response | 4 Participants |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 3.0 mg/kg | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Immune Related Best Overall Response (irBOR) According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC) | Immune-related Partial Response | 31 Participants |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 3.0 mg/kg | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Immune Related Best Overall Response (irBOR) According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC) | Not Evaluable | 22 Participants |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 10.0 mg/kg | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Immune Related Best Overall Response (irBOR) According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC) | Not Evaluable | 32 Participants |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 10.0 mg/kg | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Immune Related Best Overall Response (irBOR) According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC) | Immune-related Progressive Disease | 69 Participants |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 10.0 mg/kg | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Immune Related Best Overall Response (irBOR) According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC) | Immune-related Partial Response | 6 Participants |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 10.0 mg/kg | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Immune Related Best Overall Response (irBOR) According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC) | Immune-related Stable Disease | 60 Participants |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 10.0 mg/kg | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Immune Related Best Overall Response (irBOR) According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC) | Immune-related Complete Response | 1 Participants |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 20.0 mg/kg | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Immune Related Best Overall Response (irBOR) According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC) | Not Evaluable | 35 Participants |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 20.0 mg/kg | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Immune Related Best Overall Response (irBOR) According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC) | Immune-related Complete Response | 0 Participants |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 20.0 mg/kg | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Immune Related Best Overall Response (irBOR) According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC) | Immune-related Progressive Disease | 0 Participants |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 20.0 mg/kg | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Immune Related Best Overall Response (irBOR) According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC) | Immune-related Stable Disease | 20 Participants |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 20.0 mg/kg | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Immune Related Best Overall Response (irBOR) According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC) | Immune-related Partial Response | 5 Participants |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 10.0 mg/kg Weekly | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Immune Related Best Overall Response (irBOR) According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC) | Immune-related Progressive Disease | 0 Participants |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 10.0 mg/kg Weekly | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Immune Related Best Overall Response (irBOR) According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC) | Immune-related Complete Response | 2 Participants |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 10.0 mg/kg Weekly | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Immune Related Best Overall Response (irBOR) According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC) | Not Evaluable | 31 Participants |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 10.0 mg/kg Weekly | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Immune Related Best Overall Response (irBOR) According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC) | Immune-related Partial Response | 4 Participants |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 10.0 mg/kg Weekly | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Immune Related Best Overall Response (irBOR) According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC) | Immune-related Stable Disease | 53 Participants |
| Primary Expansion Cohort: NSCLC, Post-platinum Doublet | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Immune Related Best Overall Response (irBOR) According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC) | Not Evaluable | 7 Participants |
| Primary Expansion Cohort: NSCLC, Post-platinum Doublet | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Immune Related Best Overall Response (irBOR) According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC) | Immune-related Complete Response | 0 Participants |
| Primary Expansion Cohort: NSCLC, Post-platinum Doublet | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Immune Related Best Overall Response (irBOR) According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC) | Immune-related Stable Disease | 9 Participants |
| Primary Expansion Cohort: NSCLC, Post-platinum Doublet | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Immune Related Best Overall Response (irBOR) According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC) | Immune-related Partial Response | 0 Participants |
| Primary Expansion Cohort: NSCLC, Post-platinum Doublet | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Immune Related Best Overall Response (irBOR) According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC) | Immune-related Progressive Disease | 5 Participants |
| Primary Expansion Cohort: NSCLC, First Line | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Immune Related Best Overall Response (irBOR) According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC) | Not Evaluable | 14 Participants |
| Primary Expansion Cohort: NSCLC, First Line | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Immune Related Best Overall Response (irBOR) According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC) | Immune-related Complete Response | 0 Participants |
| Primary Expansion Cohort: NSCLC, First Line | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Immune Related Best Overall Response (irBOR) According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC) | Immune-related Stable Disease | 3 Participants |
| Primary Expansion Cohort: NSCLC, First Line | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Immune Related Best Overall Response (irBOR) According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC) | Immune-related Partial Response | 0 Participants |
| Primary Expansion Cohort: NSCLC, First Line | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Immune Related Best Overall Response (irBOR) According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC) | Immune-related Progressive Disease | 1 Participants |
| Primary Expansion Cohort: Metastatic Breast Cancer | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Immune Related Best Overall Response (irBOR) According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC) | Immune-related Complete Response | 0 Participants |
| Primary Expansion Cohort: Metastatic Breast Cancer | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Immune Related Best Overall Response (irBOR) According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC) | Immune-related Progressive Disease | 14 Participants |
| Primary Expansion Cohort: Metastatic Breast Cancer | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Immune Related Best Overall Response (irBOR) According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC) | Immune-related Partial Response | 3 Participants |
| Primary Expansion Cohort: Metastatic Breast Cancer | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Immune Related Best Overall Response (irBOR) According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC) | Not Evaluable | 7 Participants |
| Primary Expansion Cohort: Metastatic Breast Cancer | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Immune Related Best Overall Response (irBOR) According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC) | Immune-related Stable Disease | 26 Participants |
| Primary Expansion Cohort: GC/GEJC Progressed | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Immune Related Best Overall Response (irBOR) According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC) | Immune-related Partial Response | 7 Participants |
| Primary Expansion Cohort: GC/GEJC Progressed | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Immune Related Best Overall Response (irBOR) According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC) | Immune-related Progressive Disease | 11 Participants |
| Primary Expansion Cohort: GC/GEJC Progressed | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Immune Related Best Overall Response (irBOR) According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC) | Immune-related Stable Disease | 20 Participants |
| Primary Expansion Cohort: GC/GEJC Progressed | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Immune Related Best Overall Response (irBOR) According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC) | Immune-related Complete Response | 4 Participants |
| Primary Expansion Cohort: GC/GEJC Progressed | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Immune Related Best Overall Response (irBOR) According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC) | Not Evaluable | 9 Participants |
| Primary Expansion Cohort: GC/GEJC Non Progressed | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Immune Related Best Overall Response (irBOR) According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC) | Immune-related Progressive Disease | 10 Participants |
| Primary Expansion Cohort: GC/GEJC Non Progressed | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Immune Related Best Overall Response (irBOR) According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC) | Immune-related Partial Response | 4 Participants |
| Primary Expansion Cohort: GC/GEJC Non Progressed | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Immune Related Best Overall Response (irBOR) According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC) | Immune-related Complete Response | 1 Participants |
| Primary Expansion Cohort: GC/GEJC Non Progressed | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Immune Related Best Overall Response (irBOR) According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC) | Not Evaluable | 7 Participants |
| Primary Expansion Cohort: GC/GEJC Non Progressed | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Immune Related Best Overall Response (irBOR) According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC) | Immune-related Stable Disease | 31 Participants |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Colorectal Cancer | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Immune Related Best Overall Response (irBOR) According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC) | Immune-related Complete Response | 2 Participants |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Colorectal Cancer | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Immune Related Best Overall Response (irBOR) According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC) | Immune-related Partial Response | 5 Participants |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Colorectal Cancer | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Immune Related Best Overall Response (irBOR) According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC) | Immune-related Progressive Disease | 10 Participants |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Colorectal Cancer | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Immune Related Best Overall Response (irBOR) According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC) | Not Evaluable | 6 Participants |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Colorectal Cancer | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Immune Related Best Overall Response (irBOR) According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC) | Immune-related Stable Disease | 21 Participants |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Castrate-resistant Prostate Cancer | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Immune Related Best Overall Response (irBOR) According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC) | Immune-related Progressive Disease | 27 Participants |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Castrate-resistant Prostate Cancer | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Immune Related Best Overall Response (irBOR) According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC) | Not Evaluable | 21 Participants |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Castrate-resistant Prostate Cancer | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Immune Related Best Overall Response (irBOR) According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC) | Immune-related Complete Response | 1 Participants |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Castrate-resistant Prostate Cancer | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Immune Related Best Overall Response (irBOR) According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC) | Immune-related Partial Response | 15 Participants |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Castrate-resistant Prostate Cancer | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Immune Related Best Overall Response (irBOR) According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC) | Immune-related Stable Disease | 61 Participants |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Adrenocortical Carcinoma | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Immune Related Best Overall Response (irBOR) According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC) | Immune-related Progressive Disease | 6 Participants |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Adrenocortical Carcinoma | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Immune Related Best Overall Response (irBOR) According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC) | Not Evaluable | 5 Participants |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Adrenocortical Carcinoma | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Immune Related Best Overall Response (irBOR) According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC) | Immune-related Partial Response | 10 Participants |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Adrenocortical Carcinoma | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Immune Related Best Overall Response (irBOR) According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC) | Immune-related Complete Response | 1 Participants |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Adrenocortical Carcinoma | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Immune Related Best Overall Response (irBOR) According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC) | Immune-related Stable Disease | 40 Participants |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Melanoma | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Immune Related Best Overall Response (irBOR) According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC) | Not Evaluable | 2 Participants |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Melanoma | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Immune Related Best Overall Response (irBOR) According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC) | Immune-related Complete Response | 0 Participants |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Melanoma | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Immune Related Best Overall Response (irBOR) According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC) | Immune-related Progressive Disease | 1 Participants |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Melanoma | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Immune Related Best Overall Response (irBOR) According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC) | Immune-related Stable Disease | 15 Participants |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Melanoma | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Immune Related Best Overall Response (irBOR) According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC) | Immune-related Partial Response | 2 Participants |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Mesothelioma | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Immune Related Best Overall Response (irBOR) According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC) | Immune-related Progressive Disease | 33 Participants |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Mesothelioma | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Immune Related Best Overall Response (irBOR) According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC) | Immune-related Stable Disease | 44 Participants |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Mesothelioma | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Immune Related Best Overall Response (irBOR) According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC) | Immune-related Complete Response | 3 Participants |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Mesothelioma | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Immune Related Best Overall Response (irBOR) According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC) | Immune-related Partial Response | 4 Participants |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Mesothelioma | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Immune Related Best Overall Response (irBOR) According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC) | Not Evaluable | 19 Participants |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Urothelial Carcinoma | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Immune Related Best Overall Response (irBOR) According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC) | Immune-related Complete Response | 10 Participants |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Urothelial Carcinoma | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Immune Related Best Overall Response (irBOR) According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC) | Immune-related Progressive Disease | 62 Participants |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Urothelial Carcinoma | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Immune Related Best Overall Response (irBOR) According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC) | Immune-related Stable Disease | 61 Participants |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Urothelial Carcinoma | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Immune Related Best Overall Response (irBOR) According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC) | Not Evaluable | 41 Participants |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Urothelial Carcinoma | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Immune Related Best Overall Response (irBOR) According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC) | Immune-related Partial Response | 24 Participants |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Ovarian Cancer | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Immune Related Best Overall Response (irBOR) According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC) | Immune-related Complete Response | 1 Participants |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Ovarian Cancer | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Immune Related Best Overall Response (irBOR) According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC) | Immune-related Partial Response | 7 Participants |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Ovarian Cancer | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Immune Related Best Overall Response (irBOR) According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC) | Not Evaluable | 33 Participants |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Ovarian Cancer | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Immune Related Best Overall Response (irBOR) According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC) | Immune-related Progressive Disease | 62 Participants |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Ovarian Cancer | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Immune Related Best Overall Response (irBOR) According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC) | Immune-related Stable Disease | 29 Participants |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Renal Cell Carcinoma (First Line) | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Immune Related Best Overall Response (irBOR) According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC) | Not Evaluable | 27 Participants |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Renal Cell Carcinoma (First Line) | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Immune Related Best Overall Response (irBOR) According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC) | Immune-related Progressive Disease | 44 Participants |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Renal Cell Carcinoma (First Line) | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Immune Related Best Overall Response (irBOR) According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC) | Immune-related Complete Response | 6 Participants |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Renal Cell Carcinoma (First Line) | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Immune Related Best Overall Response (irBOR) According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC) | Immune-related Partial Response | 15 Participants |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Renal Cell Carcinoma (First Line) | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Immune Related Best Overall Response (irBOR) According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC) | Immune-related Stable Disease | 61 Participants |
Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Positive Programmed Death Receptor-1 Ligand-1 (PD-L1) Biomarker Expression in Tumor Tissue
PD-L1 assessment was performed using immunohistochemistry. PD-L1 expression status was classified as positive or negative based on the following cut-offs: For tumor cells: Participants were considered PD-L1 expression positive (negative): - if at least (less than) 5% of the tumor cells show PD-L1 membrane staining \>= 1+, respectively. This was used as the primary cut-off; - if at least (less than) 25% of the tumor cells show PD-L1 membrane staining \>=2+, respectively. This was considered as secondary cut-off; - if at least (less than) 1% of the tumor cells show PD-L1 membrane staining \>=1+, respectively. This was used as the tertiary cut-off; - if at least (less than) 50% of the tumor cells show PD-L1 membrane staining \>=1+, respectively. This was used as the '50% cut-off'; - if at least (less than) 80% of the tumor cells show PD-L1 membrane staining ≥1+, respectively. This was used as the '80% cut-off'.
Time frame: Dose Expansion: Baseline up to Day 2023
Population: Safety analysis set included all participants who have received at least 1 dose of study treatment. Here number analyzed signifies those participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure at specified category.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 1.0 mg/kg | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Positive Programmed Death Receptor-1 Ligand-1 (PD-L1) Biomarker Expression in Tumor Tissue | PD-L1 expression status - 50% cutoff | 54 Participants |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 1.0 mg/kg | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Positive Programmed Death Receptor-1 Ligand-1 (PD-L1) Biomarker Expression in Tumor Tissue | PD-L1 expression status - 5% cutoff | 84 Participants |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 1.0 mg/kg | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Positive Programmed Death Receptor-1 Ligand-1 (PD-L1) Biomarker Expression in Tumor Tissue | PD-L1 expression status - 25% cutoff | 53 Participants |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 1.0 mg/kg | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Positive Programmed Death Receptor-1 Ligand-1 (PD-L1) Biomarker Expression in Tumor Tissue | PD-L1 expression status - 1% cutoff | 122 Participants |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 1.0 mg/kg | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Positive Programmed Death Receptor-1 Ligand-1 (PD-L1) Biomarker Expression in Tumor Tissue | PD-L1 expression status - 80% cutoff | 41 Participants |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 3.0 mg/kg | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Positive Programmed Death Receptor-1 Ligand-1 (PD-L1) Biomarker Expression in Tumor Tissue | PD-L1 expression status - 25% cutoff | 50 Participants |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 3.0 mg/kg | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Positive Programmed Death Receptor-1 Ligand-1 (PD-L1) Biomarker Expression in Tumor Tissue | PD-L1 expression status - 5% cutoff | 76 Participants |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 3.0 mg/kg | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Positive Programmed Death Receptor-1 Ligand-1 (PD-L1) Biomarker Expression in Tumor Tissue | PD-L1 expression status - 80% cutoff | 38 Participants |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 3.0 mg/kg | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Positive Programmed Death Receptor-1 Ligand-1 (PD-L1) Biomarker Expression in Tumor Tissue | PD-L1 expression status - 50% cutoff | 53 Participants |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 3.0 mg/kg | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Positive Programmed Death Receptor-1 Ligand-1 (PD-L1) Biomarker Expression in Tumor Tissue | PD-L1 expression status - 1% cutoff | 88 Participants |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 10.0 mg/kg | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Positive Programmed Death Receptor-1 Ligand-1 (PD-L1) Biomarker Expression in Tumor Tissue | PD-L1 expression status - 50% cutoff | 13 Participants |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 10.0 mg/kg | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Positive Programmed Death Receptor-1 Ligand-1 (PD-L1) Biomarker Expression in Tumor Tissue | PD-L1 expression status - 25% cutoff | 3 Participants |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 10.0 mg/kg | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Positive Programmed Death Receptor-1 Ligand-1 (PD-L1) Biomarker Expression in Tumor Tissue | PD-L1 expression status - 5% cutoff | 25 Participants |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 10.0 mg/kg | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Positive Programmed Death Receptor-1 Ligand-1 (PD-L1) Biomarker Expression in Tumor Tissue | PD-L1 expression status - 1% cutoff | 87 Participants |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 20.0 mg/kg | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Positive Programmed Death Receptor-1 Ligand-1 (PD-L1) Biomarker Expression in Tumor Tissue | PD-L1 expression status - 1% cutoff | 20 Participants |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 10.0 mg/kg Weekly | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Positive Programmed Death Receptor-1 Ligand-1 (PD-L1) Biomarker Expression in Tumor Tissue | PD-L1 expression status - 1% cutoff | 26 Participants |
| Primary Expansion Cohort: NSCLC, Post-platinum Doublet | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Positive Programmed Death Receptor-1 Ligand-1 (PD-L1) Biomarker Expression in Tumor Tissue | PD-L1 expression status - 50% cutoff | 1 Participants |
| Primary Expansion Cohort: NSCLC, Post-platinum Doublet | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Positive Programmed Death Receptor-1 Ligand-1 (PD-L1) Biomarker Expression in Tumor Tissue | PD-L1 expression status - 1% cutoff | 5 Participants |
| Primary Expansion Cohort: NSCLC, Post-platinum Doublet | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Positive Programmed Death Receptor-1 Ligand-1 (PD-L1) Biomarker Expression in Tumor Tissue | PD-L1 expression status - 25% cutoff | 0 Participants |
| Primary Expansion Cohort: NSCLC, Post-platinum Doublet | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Positive Programmed Death Receptor-1 Ligand-1 (PD-L1) Biomarker Expression in Tumor Tissue | PD-L1 expression status - 5% cutoff | 1 Participants |
| Primary Expansion Cohort: NSCLC, First Line | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Positive Programmed Death Receptor-1 Ligand-1 (PD-L1) Biomarker Expression in Tumor Tissue | PD-L1 expression status - 5% cutoff | 0 Participants |
| Primary Expansion Cohort: NSCLC, First Line | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Positive Programmed Death Receptor-1 Ligand-1 (PD-L1) Biomarker Expression in Tumor Tissue | PD-L1 expression status - 1% cutoff | 0 Participants |
| Primary Expansion Cohort: NSCLC, First Line | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Positive Programmed Death Receptor-1 Ligand-1 (PD-L1) Biomarker Expression in Tumor Tissue | PD-L1 expression status - 25% cutoff | 0 Participants |
| Primary Expansion Cohort: NSCLC, First Line | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Positive Programmed Death Receptor-1 Ligand-1 (PD-L1) Biomarker Expression in Tumor Tissue | PD-L1 expression status - 50% cutoff | 0 Participants |
| Primary Expansion Cohort: NSCLC, First Line | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Positive Programmed Death Receptor-1 Ligand-1 (PD-L1) Biomarker Expression in Tumor Tissue | PD-L1 expression status - 80% cutoff | 0 Participants |
| Primary Expansion Cohort: Metastatic Breast Cancer | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Positive Programmed Death Receptor-1 Ligand-1 (PD-L1) Biomarker Expression in Tumor Tissue | PD-L1 expression status - 50% cutoff | 5 Participants |
| Primary Expansion Cohort: Metastatic Breast Cancer | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Positive Programmed Death Receptor-1 Ligand-1 (PD-L1) Biomarker Expression in Tumor Tissue | PD-L1 expression status - 5% cutoff | 12 Participants |
| Primary Expansion Cohort: Metastatic Breast Cancer | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Positive Programmed Death Receptor-1 Ligand-1 (PD-L1) Biomarker Expression in Tumor Tissue | PD-L1 expression status - 1% cutoff | 15 Participants |
| Primary Expansion Cohort: Metastatic Breast Cancer | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Positive Programmed Death Receptor-1 Ligand-1 (PD-L1) Biomarker Expression in Tumor Tissue | PD-L1 expression status - 25% cutoff | 3 Participants |
| Primary Expansion Cohort: Metastatic Breast Cancer | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Positive Programmed Death Receptor-1 Ligand-1 (PD-L1) Biomarker Expression in Tumor Tissue | PD-L1 expression status - 80% cutoff | 2 Participants |
| Primary Expansion Cohort: GC/GEJC Progressed | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Positive Programmed Death Receptor-1 Ligand-1 (PD-L1) Biomarker Expression in Tumor Tissue | PD-L1 expression status - 1% cutoff | 19 Participants |
| Primary Expansion Cohort: GC/GEJC Progressed | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Positive Programmed Death Receptor-1 Ligand-1 (PD-L1) Biomarker Expression in Tumor Tissue | PD-L1 expression status - 25% cutoff | 7 Participants |
| Primary Expansion Cohort: GC/GEJC Progressed | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Positive Programmed Death Receptor-1 Ligand-1 (PD-L1) Biomarker Expression in Tumor Tissue | PD-L1 expression status - 50% cutoff | 8 Participants |
| Primary Expansion Cohort: GC/GEJC Progressed | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Positive Programmed Death Receptor-1 Ligand-1 (PD-L1) Biomarker Expression in Tumor Tissue | PD-L1 expression status - 80% cutoff | 2 Participants |
| Primary Expansion Cohort: GC/GEJC Progressed | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Positive Programmed Death Receptor-1 Ligand-1 (PD-L1) Biomarker Expression in Tumor Tissue | PD-L1 expression status - 5% cutoff | 15 Participants |
| Primary Expansion Cohort: GC/GEJC Non Progressed | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Positive Programmed Death Receptor-1 Ligand-1 (PD-L1) Biomarker Expression in Tumor Tissue | PD-L1 expression status - 80% cutoff | 2 Participants |
| Primary Expansion Cohort: GC/GEJC Non Progressed | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Positive Programmed Death Receptor-1 Ligand-1 (PD-L1) Biomarker Expression in Tumor Tissue | PD-L1 expression status - 50% cutoff | 5 Participants |
| Primary Expansion Cohort: GC/GEJC Non Progressed | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Positive Programmed Death Receptor-1 Ligand-1 (PD-L1) Biomarker Expression in Tumor Tissue | PD-L1 expression status - 25% cutoff | 8 Participants |
| Primary Expansion Cohort: GC/GEJC Non Progressed | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Positive Programmed Death Receptor-1 Ligand-1 (PD-L1) Biomarker Expression in Tumor Tissue | PD-L1 expression status - 5% cutoff | 16 Participants |
| Primary Expansion Cohort: GC/GEJC Non Progressed | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Positive Programmed Death Receptor-1 Ligand-1 (PD-L1) Biomarker Expression in Tumor Tissue | PD-L1 expression status - 1% cutoff | 22 Participants |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Colorectal Cancer | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Positive Programmed Death Receptor-1 Ligand-1 (PD-L1) Biomarker Expression in Tumor Tissue | PD-L1 expression status - 80% cutoff | 3 Participants |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Colorectal Cancer | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Positive Programmed Death Receptor-1 Ligand-1 (PD-L1) Biomarker Expression in Tumor Tissue | PD-L1 expression status - 50% cutoff | 5 Participants |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Colorectal Cancer | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Positive Programmed Death Receptor-1 Ligand-1 (PD-L1) Biomarker Expression in Tumor Tissue | PD-L1 expression status - 25% cutoff | 5 Participants |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Colorectal Cancer | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Positive Programmed Death Receptor-1 Ligand-1 (PD-L1) Biomarker Expression in Tumor Tissue | PD-L1 expression status - 1% cutoff | 14 Participants |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Colorectal Cancer | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Positive Programmed Death Receptor-1 Ligand-1 (PD-L1) Biomarker Expression in Tumor Tissue | PD-L1 expression status - 5% cutoff | 13 Participants |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Castrate-resistant Prostate Cancer | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Positive Programmed Death Receptor-1 Ligand-1 (PD-L1) Biomarker Expression in Tumor Tissue | PD-L1 expression status - 1% cutoff | 76 Participants |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Castrate-resistant Prostate Cancer | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Positive Programmed Death Receptor-1 Ligand-1 (PD-L1) Biomarker Expression in Tumor Tissue | PD-L1 expression status - 80% cutoff | 2 Participants |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Castrate-resistant Prostate Cancer | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Positive Programmed Death Receptor-1 Ligand-1 (PD-L1) Biomarker Expression in Tumor Tissue | PD-L1 expression status - 5% cutoff | 32 Participants |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Castrate-resistant Prostate Cancer | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Positive Programmed Death Receptor-1 Ligand-1 (PD-L1) Biomarker Expression in Tumor Tissue | PD-L1 expression status - 25% cutoff | 3 Participants |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Castrate-resistant Prostate Cancer | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Positive Programmed Death Receptor-1 Ligand-1 (PD-L1) Biomarker Expression in Tumor Tissue | PD-L1 expression status - 50% cutoff | 2 Participants |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Adrenocortical Carcinoma | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Positive Programmed Death Receptor-1 Ligand-1 (PD-L1) Biomarker Expression in Tumor Tissue | PD-L1 expression status - 50% cutoff | 1 Participants |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Adrenocortical Carcinoma | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Positive Programmed Death Receptor-1 Ligand-1 (PD-L1) Biomarker Expression in Tumor Tissue | PD-L1 expression status - 1% cutoff | 20 Participants |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Adrenocortical Carcinoma | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Positive Programmed Death Receptor-1 Ligand-1 (PD-L1) Biomarker Expression in Tumor Tissue | PD-L1 expression status - 25% cutoff | 2 Participants |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Adrenocortical Carcinoma | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Positive Programmed Death Receptor-1 Ligand-1 (PD-L1) Biomarker Expression in Tumor Tissue | PD-L1 expression status - 5% cutoff | 11 Participants |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Adrenocortical Carcinoma | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Positive Programmed Death Receptor-1 Ligand-1 (PD-L1) Biomarker Expression in Tumor Tissue | PD-L1 expression status - 80% cutoff | 0 Participants |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Melanoma | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Positive Programmed Death Receptor-1 Ligand-1 (PD-L1) Biomarker Expression in Tumor Tissue | PD-L1 expression status - 50% cutoff | 0 Participants |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Melanoma | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Positive Programmed Death Receptor-1 Ligand-1 (PD-L1) Biomarker Expression in Tumor Tissue | PD-L1 expression status - 5% cutoff | 1 Participants |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Melanoma | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Positive Programmed Death Receptor-1 Ligand-1 (PD-L1) Biomarker Expression in Tumor Tissue | PD-L1 expression status - 80% cutoff | 0 Participants |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Melanoma | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Positive Programmed Death Receptor-1 Ligand-1 (PD-L1) Biomarker Expression in Tumor Tissue | PD-L1 expression status - 25% cutoff | 0 Participants |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Melanoma | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Positive Programmed Death Receptor-1 Ligand-1 (PD-L1) Biomarker Expression in Tumor Tissue | PD-L1 expression status - 1% cutoff | 4 Participants |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Mesothelioma | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Positive Programmed Death Receptor-1 Ligand-1 (PD-L1) Biomarker Expression in Tumor Tissue | PD-L1 expression status - 25% cutoff | 6 Participants |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Mesothelioma | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Positive Programmed Death Receptor-1 Ligand-1 (PD-L1) Biomarker Expression in Tumor Tissue | PD-L1 expression status - 80% cutoff | 0 Participants |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Mesothelioma | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Positive Programmed Death Receptor-1 Ligand-1 (PD-L1) Biomarker Expression in Tumor Tissue | PD-L1 expression status - 1% cutoff | 45 Participants |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Mesothelioma | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Positive Programmed Death Receptor-1 Ligand-1 (PD-L1) Biomarker Expression in Tumor Tissue | PD-L1 expression status - 50% cutoff | 4 Participants |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Mesothelioma | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Positive Programmed Death Receptor-1 Ligand-1 (PD-L1) Biomarker Expression in Tumor Tissue | PD-L1 expression status - 5% cutoff | 23 Participants |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Urothelial Carcinoma | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Positive Programmed Death Receptor-1 Ligand-1 (PD-L1) Biomarker Expression in Tumor Tissue | PD-L1 expression status - 25% cutoff | 25 Participants |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Urothelial Carcinoma | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Positive Programmed Death Receptor-1 Ligand-1 (PD-L1) Biomarker Expression in Tumor Tissue | PD-L1 expression status - 80% cutoff | 25 Participants |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Urothelial Carcinoma | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Positive Programmed Death Receptor-1 Ligand-1 (PD-L1) Biomarker Expression in Tumor Tissue | PD-L1 expression status - 5% cutoff | 72 Participants |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Urothelial Carcinoma | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Positive Programmed Death Receptor-1 Ligand-1 (PD-L1) Biomarker Expression in Tumor Tissue | PD-L1 expression status - 1% cutoff | 87 Participants |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Urothelial Carcinoma | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Positive Programmed Death Receptor-1 Ligand-1 (PD-L1) Biomarker Expression in Tumor Tissue | PD-L1 expression status - 50% cutoff | 34 Participants |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Ovarian Cancer | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Positive Programmed Death Receptor-1 Ligand-1 (PD-L1) Biomarker Expression in Tumor Tissue | PD-L1 expression status - 25% cutoff | 6 Participants |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Ovarian Cancer | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Positive Programmed Death Receptor-1 Ligand-1 (PD-L1) Biomarker Expression in Tumor Tissue | PD-L1 expression status - 5% cutoff | 16 Participants |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Ovarian Cancer | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Positive Programmed Death Receptor-1 Ligand-1 (PD-L1) Biomarker Expression in Tumor Tissue | PD-L1 expression status - 1% cutoff | 39 Participants |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Renal Cell Carcinoma (First Line) | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Positive Programmed Death Receptor-1 Ligand-1 (PD-L1) Biomarker Expression in Tumor Tissue | PD-L1 expression status - 25% cutoff | 48 Participants |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Renal Cell Carcinoma (First Line) | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Positive Programmed Death Receptor-1 Ligand-1 (PD-L1) Biomarker Expression in Tumor Tissue | PD-L1 expression status - 1% cutoff | 107 Participants |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Renal Cell Carcinoma (First Line) | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Positive Programmed Death Receptor-1 Ligand-1 (PD-L1) Biomarker Expression in Tumor Tissue | PD-L1 expression status - 80% cutoff | 28 Participants |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Renal Cell Carcinoma (First Line) | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Positive Programmed Death Receptor-1 Ligand-1 (PD-L1) Biomarker Expression in Tumor Tissue | PD-L1 expression status - 50% cutoff | 51 Participants |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Renal Cell Carcinoma (First Line) | Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Positive Programmed Death Receptor-1 Ligand-1 (PD-L1) Biomarker Expression in Tumor Tissue | PD-L1 expression status - 5% cutoff | 93 Participants |
Dose Expansion Cohort: Overall Survival (OS) Time
Overall survival time was measured as time in months first administration of trial treatment to death. The analysis of OS time was performed with a Kaplan-Meier method.
Time frame: Dose Expansion: Baseline up to Day 2023
Population: FAS included all participants who have received at least 1 dose of study treatment. Here Overall Number of Participants Analyzed signifies those participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 1.0 mg/kg | Dose Expansion Cohort: Overall Survival (OS) Time | 8.57 Months |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 3.0 mg/kg | Dose Expansion Cohort: Overall Survival (OS) Time | 14.23 Months |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 10.0 mg/kg | Dose Expansion Cohort: Overall Survival (OS) Time | 8.38 Months |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 20.0 mg/kg | Dose Expansion Cohort: Overall Survival (OS) Time | 6.64 Months |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 10.0 mg/kg Weekly | Dose Expansion Cohort: Overall Survival (OS) Time | 11.07 Months |
| Primary Expansion Cohort: NSCLC, Post-platinum Doublet | Dose Expansion Cohort: Overall Survival (OS) Time | 11.20 Months |
| Primary Expansion Cohort: NSCLC, First Line | Dose Expansion Cohort: Overall Survival (OS) Time | 19.32 Months |
| Primary Expansion Cohort: Metastatic Breast Cancer | Dose Expansion Cohort: Overall Survival (OS) Time | 10.55 Months |
| Primary Expansion Cohort: GC/GEJC Progressed | Dose Expansion Cohort: Overall Survival (OS) Time | 17.22 Months |
| Primary Expansion Cohort: GC/GEJC Non Progressed | Dose Expansion Cohort: Overall Survival (OS) Time | 10.71 Months |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Colorectal Cancer | Dose Expansion Cohort: Overall Survival (OS) Time | 13.70 Months |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Castrate-resistant Prostate Cancer | Dose Expansion Cohort: Overall Survival (OS) Time | 11.17 Months |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Adrenocortical Carcinoma | Dose Expansion Cohort: Overall Survival (OS) Time | NA Months |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Melanoma | Dose Expansion Cohort: Overall Survival (OS) Time | 16.85 Months |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Mesothelioma | Dose Expansion Cohort: Overall Survival (OS) Time | 9.13 Months |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Urothelial Carcinoma | Dose Expansion Cohort: Overall Survival (OS) Time | 6.97 Months |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Ovarian Cancer | Dose Expansion Cohort: Overall Survival (OS) Time | 3.35 Months |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Renal Cell Carcinoma (First Line) | Dose Expansion Cohort: Overall Survival (OS) Time | 7.98 Months |
Dose Expansion Cohort: Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Time According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version (RECIST) 1.1
The PFS time (based on investigator assessments), according to the RECIST 1.1, was defined as the time from first administration of study treatment until first documentation of progressive disease (PD) or death when death occurred within 12 weeks of the last tumor assessment or first administration of study treatment (whichever was later). PD was defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of longest diameter (SLD), taking as reference the smallest SLD recorded from baseline or the appearance of 1 or more new lesions and unequivocal progression of non-target lesions. The analysis of PFS was performed with a Kaplan-Meier method.
Time frame: Dose Expansion: Baseline up to Day 2023
Population: FAS included all participants who have received at least 1 dose of study treatment. Here Overall Number of Participants Analyzed signifies those participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 1.0 mg/kg | Dose Expansion Cohort: Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Time According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version (RECIST) 1.1 | 2.66 Months |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 3.0 mg/kg | Dose Expansion Cohort: Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Time According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version (RECIST) 1.1 | 4.04 Months |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 10.0 mg/kg | Dose Expansion Cohort: Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Time According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version (RECIST) 1.1 | 1.35 Months |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 20.0 mg/kg | Dose Expansion Cohort: Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Time According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version (RECIST) 1.1 | 1.38 Months |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 10.0 mg/kg Weekly | Dose Expansion Cohort: Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Time According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version (RECIST) 1.1 | 2.76 Months |
| Primary Expansion Cohort: NSCLC, Post-platinum Doublet | Dose Expansion Cohort: Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Time According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version (RECIST) 1.1 | 1.41 Months |
| Primary Expansion Cohort: NSCLC, First Line | Dose Expansion Cohort: Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Time According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version (RECIST) 1.1 | 5.39 Months |
| Primary Expansion Cohort: Metastatic Breast Cancer | Dose Expansion Cohort: Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Time According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version (RECIST) 1.1 | 2.56 Months |
| Primary Expansion Cohort: GC/GEJC Progressed | Dose Expansion Cohort: Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Time According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version (RECIST) 1.1 | 3.06 Months |
| Primary Expansion Cohort: GC/GEJC Non Progressed | Dose Expansion Cohort: Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Time According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version (RECIST) 1.1 | 4.11 Months |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Colorectal Cancer | Dose Expansion Cohort: Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Time According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version (RECIST) 1.1 | 2.69 Months |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Castrate-resistant Prostate Cancer | Dose Expansion Cohort: Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Time According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version (RECIST) 1.1 | 2.60 Months |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Adrenocortical Carcinoma | Dose Expansion Cohort: Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Time According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version (RECIST) 1.1 | 8.28 Months |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Melanoma | Dose Expansion Cohort: Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Time According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version (RECIST) 1.1 | 5.55 Months |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Mesothelioma | Dose Expansion Cohort: Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Time According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version (RECIST) 1.1 | 1.45 Months |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Urothelial Carcinoma | Dose Expansion Cohort: Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Time According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version (RECIST) 1.1 | 1.41 Months |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Ovarian Cancer | Dose Expansion Cohort: Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Time According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version (RECIST) 1.1 | 1.31 Months |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Renal Cell Carcinoma (First Line) | Dose Expansion Cohort: Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Time According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version (RECIST) 1.1 | 1.77 Months |
Dose Expansion Cohort (Secondary Urothelial Carcinoma Cohort): Number of Participants With Confirmed Best Overall Response According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 as Adjudicated by an Independent Endpoint Review Committee
Confirmed Best Overall Response (BOR) was determined according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) v1.1and as adjudicated by an Independent Endpoint Review Committee (IERC) is defined as best response of any of complete response (CR), partial response (PR), stable disease (SD) and progressive disease (PD) recorded from date of randomization until disease progression/recurrence (taking smallest measurement recorded since start of treatment as reference). CR: Disappearance of all evidence of target/non-target lesions. PR: At least 30% reduction from baseline in sum of longest diameter (SLD) of all lesions. SD: Neither sufficient increase to qualify for PD nor sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR. PD: at least a 20% increase in SLD, taking as reference smallest SLD recorded from baseline/appearance of 1or more new lesions and unequivocal progression of non-target lesions. Number of participants with BOR in each category (CR, PR, SD, PD) were reported.
Time frame: Secondary Urothelial Carcinoma Dose Expansion: Baseline up to Day 931
Population: FAS included all participants who have received at least 1 dose of study treatment. This outcome measure was planned to be analyzed in Secondary Urothelial Carcinoma Cohort only.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 1.0 mg/kg | Dose Expansion Cohort (Secondary Urothelial Carcinoma Cohort): Number of Participants With Confirmed Best Overall Response According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 as Adjudicated by an Independent Endpoint Review Committee | Partial Response | 1 Participants |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 1.0 mg/kg | Dose Expansion Cohort (Secondary Urothelial Carcinoma Cohort): Number of Participants With Confirmed Best Overall Response According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 as Adjudicated by an Independent Endpoint Review Committee | Not Evaluable | 5 Participants |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 1.0 mg/kg | Dose Expansion Cohort (Secondary Urothelial Carcinoma Cohort): Number of Participants With Confirmed Best Overall Response According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 as Adjudicated by an Independent Endpoint Review Committee | Complete Response | 6 Participants |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 1.0 mg/kg | Dose Expansion Cohort (Secondary Urothelial Carcinoma Cohort): Number of Participants With Confirmed Best Overall Response According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 as Adjudicated by an Independent Endpoint Review Committee | Stable Disease | 16 Participants |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 1.0 mg/kg | Dose Expansion Cohort (Secondary Urothelial Carcinoma Cohort): Number of Participants With Confirmed Best Overall Response According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 as Adjudicated by an Independent Endpoint Review Committee | Non-CR/Non-PD | 0 Participants |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 1.0 mg/kg | Dose Expansion Cohort (Secondary Urothelial Carcinoma Cohort): Number of Participants With Confirmed Best Overall Response According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 as Adjudicated by an Independent Endpoint Review Committee | Progressive Disease | 16 Participants |
Dose Expansion Phase: Minimum Serum Post-dose (Ctrough) Concentration of Avelumab
Serum Ctrough concentration of Avelumab is reported.
Time frame: At Day 15, 29, 43, 57, 71, 85, 99, 127 and 169
Population: Pharmacokinetic analysis set was used. Here Overall number of participants analyzed signifies those who were evaluable for this outcome measure and Number analyzed signifies those who were evaluable at specified time points. Data for primary expansion cohort: GC/GEJC Progressed and primary expansion cohort: GC/GEJC Non progressed arms was reported as a single arm primary expansion cohort: GC/GEJC Progressed/Non progressed for this outcome measure as per planned analysis.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 1.0 mg/kg | Dose Expansion Phase: Minimum Serum Post-dose (Ctrough) Concentration of Avelumab | Day 15 | 20.4 Microgram per milliliter | Standard Deviation 16.1 |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 1.0 mg/kg | Dose Expansion Phase: Minimum Serum Post-dose (Ctrough) Concentration of Avelumab | Day 169 | 36.6 Microgram per milliliter | Standard Deviation 25.8 |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 1.0 mg/kg | Dose Expansion Phase: Minimum Serum Post-dose (Ctrough) Concentration of Avelumab | Day 85 | 27.8 Microgram per milliliter | Standard Deviation 18.9 |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 1.0 mg/kg | Dose Expansion Phase: Minimum Serum Post-dose (Ctrough) Concentration of Avelumab | Day 71 | 27.9 Microgram per milliliter | Standard Deviation 36.5 |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 1.0 mg/kg | Dose Expansion Phase: Minimum Serum Post-dose (Ctrough) Concentration of Avelumab | Day 43 | 24.6 Microgram per milliliter | Standard Deviation 15.6 |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 1.0 mg/kg | Dose Expansion Phase: Minimum Serum Post-dose (Ctrough) Concentration of Avelumab | Day 57 | 26.2 Microgram per milliliter | Standard Deviation 17.3 |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 1.0 mg/kg | Dose Expansion Phase: Minimum Serum Post-dose (Ctrough) Concentration of Avelumab | Day 127 | 36.9 Microgram per milliliter | Standard Deviation 24 |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 1.0 mg/kg | Dose Expansion Phase: Minimum Serum Post-dose (Ctrough) Concentration of Avelumab | Day 29 | 23.5 Microgram per milliliter | Standard Deviation 15.4 |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 3.0 mg/kg | Dose Expansion Phase: Minimum Serum Post-dose (Ctrough) Concentration of Avelumab | Day 71 | 31.0 Microgram per milliliter | Standard Deviation 40.1 |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 3.0 mg/kg | Dose Expansion Phase: Minimum Serum Post-dose (Ctrough) Concentration of Avelumab | Day 29 | 23.5 Microgram per milliliter | Standard Deviation 15.1 |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 3.0 mg/kg | Dose Expansion Phase: Minimum Serum Post-dose (Ctrough) Concentration of Avelumab | Day 99 | 28.8 Microgram per milliliter | Standard Deviation 13.6 |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 3.0 mg/kg | Dose Expansion Phase: Minimum Serum Post-dose (Ctrough) Concentration of Avelumab | Day 85 | 27.7 Microgram per milliliter | Standard Deviation 16.7 |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 3.0 mg/kg | Dose Expansion Phase: Minimum Serum Post-dose (Ctrough) Concentration of Avelumab | Day 15 | 18.3 Microgram per milliliter | Standard Deviation 10.3 |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 3.0 mg/kg | Dose Expansion Phase: Minimum Serum Post-dose (Ctrough) Concentration of Avelumab | Day 169 | 39.1 Microgram per milliliter | Standard Deviation 19.8 |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 3.0 mg/kg | Dose Expansion Phase: Minimum Serum Post-dose (Ctrough) Concentration of Avelumab | Day 57 | 23.4 Microgram per milliliter | Standard Deviation 16.1 |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 3.0 mg/kg | Dose Expansion Phase: Minimum Serum Post-dose (Ctrough) Concentration of Avelumab | Day 43 | 23.8 Microgram per milliliter | Standard Deviation 15.9 |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 10.0 mg/kg | Dose Expansion Phase: Minimum Serum Post-dose (Ctrough) Concentration of Avelumab | Day 15 | 22.5 Microgram per milliliter | Standard Deviation 11.1 |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 10.0 mg/kg | Dose Expansion Phase: Minimum Serum Post-dose (Ctrough) Concentration of Avelumab | Day 43 | 28.3 Microgram per milliliter | Standard Deviation 18.2 |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 10.0 mg/kg | Dose Expansion Phase: Minimum Serum Post-dose (Ctrough) Concentration of Avelumab | Day 57 | 26.5 Microgram per milliliter | Standard Deviation 14.1 |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 10.0 mg/kg | Dose Expansion Phase: Minimum Serum Post-dose (Ctrough) Concentration of Avelumab | Day 127 | 39.1 Microgram per milliliter | Standard Deviation 40.2 |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 10.0 mg/kg | Dose Expansion Phase: Minimum Serum Post-dose (Ctrough) Concentration of Avelumab | Day 29 | 25.6 Microgram per milliliter | Standard Deviation 15.2 |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 10.0 mg/kg | Dose Expansion Phase: Minimum Serum Post-dose (Ctrough) Concentration of Avelumab | Day 71 | 28.1 Microgram per milliliter | Standard Deviation 16.6 |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 10.0 mg/kg | Dose Expansion Phase: Minimum Serum Post-dose (Ctrough) Concentration of Avelumab | Day 85 | 29.7 Microgram per milliliter | Standard Deviation 18.1 |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 10.0 mg/kg | Dose Expansion Phase: Minimum Serum Post-dose (Ctrough) Concentration of Avelumab | Day 169 | 31.4 Microgram per milliliter | Standard Deviation 18.2 |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 20.0 mg/kg | Dose Expansion Phase: Minimum Serum Post-dose (Ctrough) Concentration of Avelumab | Day 29 | 26.5 Microgram per milliliter | Standard Deviation 17 |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 20.0 mg/kg | Dose Expansion Phase: Minimum Serum Post-dose (Ctrough) Concentration of Avelumab | Day 57 | 28.9 Microgram per milliliter | Standard Deviation 14.5 |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 20.0 mg/kg | Dose Expansion Phase: Minimum Serum Post-dose (Ctrough) Concentration of Avelumab | Day 15 | 23.7 Microgram per milliliter | Standard Deviation 24.6 |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 20.0 mg/kg | Dose Expansion Phase: Minimum Serum Post-dose (Ctrough) Concentration of Avelumab | Day 43 | 29.7 Microgram per milliliter | Standard Deviation 17.8 |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 20.0 mg/kg | Dose Expansion Phase: Minimum Serum Post-dose (Ctrough) Concentration of Avelumab | Day 71 | 29.9 Microgram per milliliter | Standard Deviation 15.4 |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 20.0 mg/kg | Dose Expansion Phase: Minimum Serum Post-dose (Ctrough) Concentration of Avelumab | Day 85 | 28.9 Microgram per milliliter | Standard Deviation 16.8 |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 20.0 mg/kg | Dose Expansion Phase: Minimum Serum Post-dose (Ctrough) Concentration of Avelumab | Day 127 | 33.1 Microgram per milliliter | Standard Deviation 24 |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 20.0 mg/kg | Dose Expansion Phase: Minimum Serum Post-dose (Ctrough) Concentration of Avelumab | Day 169 | 31.9 Microgram per milliliter | Standard Deviation 14 |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 10.0 mg/kg Weekly | Dose Expansion Phase: Minimum Serum Post-dose (Ctrough) Concentration of Avelumab | Day 15 | 17.8 Microgram per milliliter | Standard Deviation 9.51 |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 10.0 mg/kg Weekly | Dose Expansion Phase: Minimum Serum Post-dose (Ctrough) Concentration of Avelumab | Day 127 | 28.8 Microgram per milliliter | Standard Deviation 22.1 |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 10.0 mg/kg Weekly | Dose Expansion Phase: Minimum Serum Post-dose (Ctrough) Concentration of Avelumab | Day 71 | 22.0 Microgram per milliliter | Standard Deviation 15.5 |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 10.0 mg/kg Weekly | Dose Expansion Phase: Minimum Serum Post-dose (Ctrough) Concentration of Avelumab | Day 43 | 20.6 Microgram per milliliter | Standard Deviation 14.3 |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 10.0 mg/kg Weekly | Dose Expansion Phase: Minimum Serum Post-dose (Ctrough) Concentration of Avelumab | Day 169 | 24.7 Microgram per milliliter | Standard Deviation 28.1 |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 10.0 mg/kg Weekly | Dose Expansion Phase: Minimum Serum Post-dose (Ctrough) Concentration of Avelumab | Day 57 | 22.2 Microgram per milliliter | Standard Deviation 19.8 |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 10.0 mg/kg Weekly | Dose Expansion Phase: Minimum Serum Post-dose (Ctrough) Concentration of Avelumab | Day 29 | 17.3 Microgram per milliliter | Standard Deviation 13.6 |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 10.0 mg/kg Weekly | Dose Expansion Phase: Minimum Serum Post-dose (Ctrough) Concentration of Avelumab | Day 85 | 24.9 Microgram per milliliter | Standard Deviation 29 |
| Primary Expansion Cohort: NSCLC, Post-platinum Doublet | Dose Expansion Phase: Minimum Serum Post-dose (Ctrough) Concentration of Avelumab | Day 85 | 8.03 Microgram per milliliter | Standard Deviation 0.988 |
| Primary Expansion Cohort: NSCLC, Post-platinum Doublet | Dose Expansion Phase: Minimum Serum Post-dose (Ctrough) Concentration of Avelumab | Day 127 | 34.2 Microgram per milliliter | — |
| Primary Expansion Cohort: NSCLC, Post-platinum Doublet | Dose Expansion Phase: Minimum Serum Post-dose (Ctrough) Concentration of Avelumab | Day 29 | 25.5 Microgram per milliliter | Standard Deviation 20.1 |
| Primary Expansion Cohort: NSCLC, Post-platinum Doublet | Dose Expansion Phase: Minimum Serum Post-dose (Ctrough) Concentration of Avelumab | Day 15 | 22.4 Microgram per milliliter | Standard Deviation 14.1 |
| Primary Expansion Cohort: NSCLC, Post-platinum Doublet | Dose Expansion Phase: Minimum Serum Post-dose (Ctrough) Concentration of Avelumab | Day 169 | 10.5 Microgram per milliliter | — |
| Primary Expansion Cohort: NSCLC, Post-platinum Doublet | Dose Expansion Phase: Minimum Serum Post-dose (Ctrough) Concentration of Avelumab | Day 43 | 23.2 Microgram per milliliter | Standard Deviation 24.2 |
| Primary Expansion Cohort: NSCLC, First Line | Dose Expansion Phase: Minimum Serum Post-dose (Ctrough) Concentration of Avelumab | Day 85 | 37.9 Microgram per milliliter | Standard Deviation 18.3 |
| Primary Expansion Cohort: NSCLC, First Line | Dose Expansion Phase: Minimum Serum Post-dose (Ctrough) Concentration of Avelumab | Day 127 | 44.2 Microgram per milliliter | Standard Deviation 12.7 |
| Primary Expansion Cohort: NSCLC, First Line | Dose Expansion Phase: Minimum Serum Post-dose (Ctrough) Concentration of Avelumab | Day 29 | 31.6 Microgram per milliliter | Standard Deviation 15.9 |
| Primary Expansion Cohort: NSCLC, First Line | Dose Expansion Phase: Minimum Serum Post-dose (Ctrough) Concentration of Avelumab | Day 43 | 32.3 Microgram per milliliter | Standard Deviation 16.3 |
| Primary Expansion Cohort: NSCLC, First Line | Dose Expansion Phase: Minimum Serum Post-dose (Ctrough) Concentration of Avelumab | Day 15 | 28.8 Microgram per milliliter | Standard Deviation 14.5 |
| Primary Expansion Cohort: Metastatic Breast Cancer | Dose Expansion Phase: Minimum Serum Post-dose (Ctrough) Concentration of Avelumab | Day 85 | 35.6 Microgram per milliliter | Standard Deviation 23.7 |
| Primary Expansion Cohort: Metastatic Breast Cancer | Dose Expansion Phase: Minimum Serum Post-dose (Ctrough) Concentration of Avelumab | Day 71 | 28.8 Microgram per milliliter | Standard Deviation 23.6 |
| Primary Expansion Cohort: Metastatic Breast Cancer | Dose Expansion Phase: Minimum Serum Post-dose (Ctrough) Concentration of Avelumab | Day 169 | 35.3 Microgram per milliliter | Standard Deviation 20.2 |
| Primary Expansion Cohort: Metastatic Breast Cancer | Dose Expansion Phase: Minimum Serum Post-dose (Ctrough) Concentration of Avelumab | Day 15 | 22.3 Microgram per milliliter | Standard Deviation 13.4 |
| Primary Expansion Cohort: Metastatic Breast Cancer | Dose Expansion Phase: Minimum Serum Post-dose (Ctrough) Concentration of Avelumab | Day 43 | 29.3 Microgram per milliliter | Standard Deviation 22.9 |
| Primary Expansion Cohort: Metastatic Breast Cancer | Dose Expansion Phase: Minimum Serum Post-dose (Ctrough) Concentration of Avelumab | Day 127 | 58.6 Microgram per milliliter | Standard Deviation 76.7 |
| Primary Expansion Cohort: Metastatic Breast Cancer | Dose Expansion Phase: Minimum Serum Post-dose (Ctrough) Concentration of Avelumab | Day 57 | 29.9 Microgram per milliliter | Standard Deviation 22.4 |
| Primary Expansion Cohort: Metastatic Breast Cancer | Dose Expansion Phase: Minimum Serum Post-dose (Ctrough) Concentration of Avelumab | Day 29 | 23.8 Microgram per milliliter | Standard Deviation 17.3 |
| Primary Expansion Cohort: GC/GEJC Progressed | Dose Expansion Phase: Minimum Serum Post-dose (Ctrough) Concentration of Avelumab | Day 127 | 25.9 Microgram per milliliter | Standard Deviation 11.3 |
| Primary Expansion Cohort: GC/GEJC Progressed | Dose Expansion Phase: Minimum Serum Post-dose (Ctrough) Concentration of Avelumab | Day 169 | 28.7 Microgram per milliliter | Standard Deviation 11.4 |
| Primary Expansion Cohort: GC/GEJC Progressed | Dose Expansion Phase: Minimum Serum Post-dose (Ctrough) Concentration of Avelumab | Day 57 | 18.2 Microgram per milliliter | Standard Deviation 11.7 |
| Primary Expansion Cohort: GC/GEJC Progressed | Dose Expansion Phase: Minimum Serum Post-dose (Ctrough) Concentration of Avelumab | Day 85 | 23.7 Microgram per milliliter | Standard Deviation 15.8 |
| Primary Expansion Cohort: GC/GEJC Progressed | Dose Expansion Phase: Minimum Serum Post-dose (Ctrough) Concentration of Avelumab | Day 71 | 21.0 Microgram per milliliter | Standard Deviation 14.2 |
| Primary Expansion Cohort: GC/GEJC Progressed | Dose Expansion Phase: Minimum Serum Post-dose (Ctrough) Concentration of Avelumab | Day 15 | 21.7 Microgram per milliliter | Standard Deviation 26.7 |
| Primary Expansion Cohort: GC/GEJC Progressed | Dose Expansion Phase: Minimum Serum Post-dose (Ctrough) Concentration of Avelumab | Day 29 | 20.7 Microgram per milliliter | Standard Deviation 12.4 |
| Primary Expansion Cohort: GC/GEJC Progressed | Dose Expansion Phase: Minimum Serum Post-dose (Ctrough) Concentration of Avelumab | Day 43 | 23.6 Microgram per milliliter | Standard Deviation 18.9 |
| Primary Expansion Cohort: GC/GEJC Non Progressed | Dose Expansion Phase: Minimum Serum Post-dose (Ctrough) Concentration of Avelumab | Day 57 | 39.8 Microgram per milliliter | Standard Deviation 25.5 |
| Primary Expansion Cohort: GC/GEJC Non Progressed | Dose Expansion Phase: Minimum Serum Post-dose (Ctrough) Concentration of Avelumab | Day 15 | 26.9 Microgram per milliliter | Standard Deviation 14.4 |
| Primary Expansion Cohort: GC/GEJC Non Progressed | Dose Expansion Phase: Minimum Serum Post-dose (Ctrough) Concentration of Avelumab | Day 43 | 35.7 Microgram per milliliter | Standard Deviation 22.6 |
| Primary Expansion Cohort: GC/GEJC Non Progressed | Dose Expansion Phase: Minimum Serum Post-dose (Ctrough) Concentration of Avelumab | Day 169 | 47.1 Microgram per milliliter | Standard Deviation 26.8 |
| Primary Expansion Cohort: GC/GEJC Non Progressed | Dose Expansion Phase: Minimum Serum Post-dose (Ctrough) Concentration of Avelumab | Day 71 | 38.4 Microgram per milliliter | Standard Deviation 33.4 |
| Primary Expansion Cohort: GC/GEJC Non Progressed | Dose Expansion Phase: Minimum Serum Post-dose (Ctrough) Concentration of Avelumab | Day 29 | 35.7 Microgram per milliliter | Standard Deviation 22.3 |
| Primary Expansion Cohort: GC/GEJC Non Progressed | Dose Expansion Phase: Minimum Serum Post-dose (Ctrough) Concentration of Avelumab | Day 85 | 39.7 Microgram per milliliter | Standard Deviation 27.2 |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Colorectal Cancer | Dose Expansion Phase: Minimum Serum Post-dose (Ctrough) Concentration of Avelumab | Day 43 | 29.4 Microgram per milliliter | Standard Deviation 19.7 |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Colorectal Cancer | Dose Expansion Phase: Minimum Serum Post-dose (Ctrough) Concentration of Avelumab | Day 29 | 27.4 Microgram per milliliter | Standard Deviation 16.6 |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Colorectal Cancer | Dose Expansion Phase: Minimum Serum Post-dose (Ctrough) Concentration of Avelumab | Day 57 | 25.5 Microgram per milliliter | Standard Deviation 18.7 |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Colorectal Cancer | Dose Expansion Phase: Minimum Serum Post-dose (Ctrough) Concentration of Avelumab | Day 71 | 27.8 Microgram per milliliter | Standard Deviation 17.6 |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Colorectal Cancer | Dose Expansion Phase: Minimum Serum Post-dose (Ctrough) Concentration of Avelumab | Day 85 | 34.4 Microgram per milliliter | Standard Deviation 20.2 |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Colorectal Cancer | Dose Expansion Phase: Minimum Serum Post-dose (Ctrough) Concentration of Avelumab | Day 15 | 25.1 Microgram per milliliter | Standard Deviation 11.6 |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Colorectal Cancer | Dose Expansion Phase: Minimum Serum Post-dose (Ctrough) Concentration of Avelumab | Day 169 | 43.6 Microgram per milliliter | — |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Castrate-resistant Prostate Cancer | Dose Expansion Phase: Minimum Serum Post-dose (Ctrough) Concentration of Avelumab | Day 71 | 29.4 Microgram per milliliter | Standard Deviation 22.1 |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Castrate-resistant Prostate Cancer | Dose Expansion Phase: Minimum Serum Post-dose (Ctrough) Concentration of Avelumab | Day 43 | 28.1 Microgram per milliliter | Standard Deviation 18.9 |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Castrate-resistant Prostate Cancer | Dose Expansion Phase: Minimum Serum Post-dose (Ctrough) Concentration of Avelumab | Day 169 | 38.8 Microgram per milliliter | Standard Deviation 19.2 |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Castrate-resistant Prostate Cancer | Dose Expansion Phase: Minimum Serum Post-dose (Ctrough) Concentration of Avelumab | Day 127 | 35.7 Microgram per milliliter | Standard Deviation 18.2 |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Castrate-resistant Prostate Cancer | Dose Expansion Phase: Minimum Serum Post-dose (Ctrough) Concentration of Avelumab | Day 29 | 26.2 Microgram per milliliter | Standard Deviation 16.9 |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Castrate-resistant Prostate Cancer | Dose Expansion Phase: Minimum Serum Post-dose (Ctrough) Concentration of Avelumab | Day 85 | 34.7 Microgram per milliliter | Standard Deviation 20.5 |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Castrate-resistant Prostate Cancer | Dose Expansion Phase: Minimum Serum Post-dose (Ctrough) Concentration of Avelumab | Day 57 | 29.7 Microgram per milliliter | Standard Deviation 22.8 |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Castrate-resistant Prostate Cancer | Dose Expansion Phase: Minimum Serum Post-dose (Ctrough) Concentration of Avelumab | Day 15 | 21.3 Microgram per milliliter | Standard Deviation 12 |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Adrenocortical Carcinoma | Dose Expansion Phase: Minimum Serum Post-dose (Ctrough) Concentration of Avelumab | Day 71 | 33.4 Microgram per milliliter | Standard Deviation 31.8 |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Adrenocortical Carcinoma | Dose Expansion Phase: Minimum Serum Post-dose (Ctrough) Concentration of Avelumab | Day 57 | 27.3 Microgram per milliliter | Standard Deviation 21.5 |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Adrenocortical Carcinoma | Dose Expansion Phase: Minimum Serum Post-dose (Ctrough) Concentration of Avelumab | Day 29 | 27.7 Microgram per milliliter | Standard Deviation 18.3 |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Adrenocortical Carcinoma | Dose Expansion Phase: Minimum Serum Post-dose (Ctrough) Concentration of Avelumab | Day 85 | 39.1 Microgram per milliliter | Standard Deviation 28.3 |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Adrenocortical Carcinoma | Dose Expansion Phase: Minimum Serum Post-dose (Ctrough) Concentration of Avelumab | Day 169 | 49.3 Microgram per milliliter | Standard Deviation 27.3 |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Adrenocortical Carcinoma | Dose Expansion Phase: Minimum Serum Post-dose (Ctrough) Concentration of Avelumab | Day 43 | 28.4 Microgram per milliliter | Standard Deviation 20.9 |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Adrenocortical Carcinoma | Dose Expansion Phase: Minimum Serum Post-dose (Ctrough) Concentration of Avelumab | Day 127 | 40.7 Microgram per milliliter | Standard Deviation 25.1 |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Adrenocortical Carcinoma | Dose Expansion Phase: Minimum Serum Post-dose (Ctrough) Concentration of Avelumab | Day 15 | 23.1 Microgram per milliliter | Standard Deviation 14.1 |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Melanoma | Dose Expansion Phase: Minimum Serum Post-dose (Ctrough) Concentration of Avelumab | Day 71 | 19.6 Microgram per milliliter | Standard Deviation 15.3 |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Melanoma | Dose Expansion Phase: Minimum Serum Post-dose (Ctrough) Concentration of Avelumab | Day 29 | 18.6 Microgram per milliliter | Standard Deviation 16 |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Melanoma | Dose Expansion Phase: Minimum Serum Post-dose (Ctrough) Concentration of Avelumab | Day 15 | 18.1 Microgram per milliliter | Standard Deviation 12.4 |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Melanoma | Dose Expansion Phase: Minimum Serum Post-dose (Ctrough) Concentration of Avelumab | Day 85 | 19.3 Microgram per milliliter | Standard Deviation 3.6 |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Melanoma | Dose Expansion Phase: Minimum Serum Post-dose (Ctrough) Concentration of Avelumab | Day 43 | 19.8 Microgram per milliliter | Standard Deviation 21.5 |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Melanoma | Dose Expansion Phase: Minimum Serum Post-dose (Ctrough) Concentration of Avelumab | Day 57 | 16.2 Microgram per milliliter | Standard Deviation 15.2 |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Mesothelioma | Dose Expansion Phase: Minimum Serum Post-dose (Ctrough) Concentration of Avelumab | Day 43 | 29.0 Microgram per milliliter | Standard Deviation 17.6 |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Mesothelioma | Dose Expansion Phase: Minimum Serum Post-dose (Ctrough) Concentration of Avelumab | Day 169 | 32.5 Microgram per milliliter | Standard Deviation 14.7 |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Mesothelioma | Dose Expansion Phase: Minimum Serum Post-dose (Ctrough) Concentration of Avelumab | Day 71 | 31.1 Microgram per milliliter | Standard Deviation 18.8 |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Mesothelioma | Dose Expansion Phase: Minimum Serum Post-dose (Ctrough) Concentration of Avelumab | Day 57 | 30.6 Microgram per milliliter | Standard Deviation 18.1 |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Mesothelioma | Dose Expansion Phase: Minimum Serum Post-dose (Ctrough) Concentration of Avelumab | Day 15 | 20.1 Microgram per milliliter | Standard Deviation 10.1 |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Mesothelioma | Dose Expansion Phase: Minimum Serum Post-dose (Ctrough) Concentration of Avelumab | Day 85 | 35.6 Microgram per milliliter | Standard Deviation 20.7 |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Mesothelioma | Dose Expansion Phase: Minimum Serum Post-dose (Ctrough) Concentration of Avelumab | Day 29 | 27.0 Microgram per milliliter | Standard Deviation 23.9 |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Urothelial Carcinoma | Dose Expansion Phase: Minimum Serum Post-dose (Ctrough) Concentration of Avelumab | Day 169 | 28.3 Microgram per milliliter | Standard Deviation 20 |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Urothelial Carcinoma | Dose Expansion Phase: Minimum Serum Post-dose (Ctrough) Concentration of Avelumab | Day 29 | 23.9 Microgram per milliliter | Standard Deviation 16.2 |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Urothelial Carcinoma | Dose Expansion Phase: Minimum Serum Post-dose (Ctrough) Concentration of Avelumab | Day 85 | 31.2 Microgram per milliliter | Standard Deviation 22 |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Urothelial Carcinoma | Dose Expansion Phase: Minimum Serum Post-dose (Ctrough) Concentration of Avelumab | Day 57 | 28.5 Microgram per milliliter | Standard Deviation 20.3 |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Urothelial Carcinoma | Dose Expansion Phase: Minimum Serum Post-dose (Ctrough) Concentration of Avelumab | Day 15 | 22.3 Microgram per milliliter | Standard Deviation 11.1 |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Urothelial Carcinoma | Dose Expansion Phase: Minimum Serum Post-dose (Ctrough) Concentration of Avelumab | Day 71 | 30.4 Microgram per milliliter | Standard Deviation 23 |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Urothelial Carcinoma | Dose Expansion Phase: Minimum Serum Post-dose (Ctrough) Concentration of Avelumab | Day 43 | 27.7 Microgram per milliliter | Standard Deviation 18.1 |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Ovarian Cancer | Dose Expansion Phase: Minimum Serum Post-dose (Ctrough) Concentration of Avelumab | Day 15 | 17.6 Microgram per milliliter | Standard Deviation 10.7 |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Ovarian Cancer | Dose Expansion Phase: Minimum Serum Post-dose (Ctrough) Concentration of Avelumab | Day 43 | 25.2 Microgram per milliliter | Standard Deviation 17.7 |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Ovarian Cancer | Dose Expansion Phase: Minimum Serum Post-dose (Ctrough) Concentration of Avelumab | Day 169 | 37.3 Microgram per milliliter | Standard Deviation 31.6 |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Ovarian Cancer | Dose Expansion Phase: Minimum Serum Post-dose (Ctrough) Concentration of Avelumab | Day 85 | 28.0 Microgram per milliliter | Standard Deviation 14.6 |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Ovarian Cancer | Dose Expansion Phase: Minimum Serum Post-dose (Ctrough) Concentration of Avelumab | Day 29 | 21.3 Microgram per milliliter | Standard Deviation 13 |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Ovarian Cancer | Dose Expansion Phase: Minimum Serum Post-dose (Ctrough) Concentration of Avelumab | Day 57 | 24.1 Microgram per milliliter | Standard Deviation 15.6 |
| Secondary Expansion Cohort: Ovarian Cancer | Dose Expansion Phase: Minimum Serum Post-dose (Ctrough) Concentration of Avelumab | Day 71 | 24.2 Microgram per milliliter | Standard Deviation 14.7 |
Dose Expansion Phase: Serum Concentration at End of Infusion (CEOI) of Avelumab
Serum concentration at end of infusion (CEOI) of Avelumab is reported.
Time frame: At Day 1, 15, 29, 43, 85, 127 and 169
Population: Pharmacokinetic analysis set was used. Here Overall number of participants analyzed signifies those who were evaluable for this outcome measure and Number analyzed signifies those who were evaluable at specified time points. Data was reported for those arms for which end of infusion sample were collected as per planned analysis.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 1.0 mg/kg | Dose Expansion Phase: Serum Concentration at End of Infusion (CEOI) of Avelumab | Day 85 | 266 Microgram per milliliter | Standard Deviation 79.5 |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 1.0 mg/kg | Dose Expansion Phase: Serum Concentration at End of Infusion (CEOI) of Avelumab | Day 43 | 250 Microgram per milliliter | Standard Deviation 69.8 |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 1.0 mg/kg | Dose Expansion Phase: Serum Concentration at End of Infusion (CEOI) of Avelumab | Day 1 | 246 Microgram per milliliter | Standard Deviation 87.4 |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 1.0 mg/kg | Dose Expansion Phase: Serum Concentration at End of Infusion (CEOI) of Avelumab | Day 169 | 304 Microgram per milliliter | Standard Deviation 64.9 |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 3.0 mg/kg | Dose Expansion Phase: Serum Concentration at End of Infusion (CEOI) of Avelumab | Day 1 | 272 Microgram per milliliter | Standard Deviation 73.9 |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 3.0 mg/kg | Dose Expansion Phase: Serum Concentration at End of Infusion (CEOI) of Avelumab | Day 15 | 297 Microgram per milliliter | Standard Deviation 99.6 |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 3.0 mg/kg | Dose Expansion Phase: Serum Concentration at End of Infusion (CEOI) of Avelumab | Day 169 | 272 Microgram per milliliter | — |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 3.0 mg/kg | Dose Expansion Phase: Serum Concentration at End of Infusion (CEOI) of Avelumab | Day 29 | 287 Microgram per milliliter | Standard Deviation 89.5 |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 3.0 mg/kg | Dose Expansion Phase: Serum Concentration at End of Infusion (CEOI) of Avelumab | Day 43 | 306 Microgram per milliliter | Standard Deviation 108 |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 3.0 mg/kg | Dose Expansion Phase: Serum Concentration at End of Infusion (CEOI) of Avelumab | Day 127 | 269 Microgram per milliliter | Standard Deviation 45.4 |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 3.0 mg/kg | Dose Expansion Phase: Serum Concentration at End of Infusion (CEOI) of Avelumab | Day 85 | 216 Microgram per milliliter | Standard Deviation 24.9 |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 10.0 mg/kg | Dose Expansion Phase: Serum Concentration at End of Infusion (CEOI) of Avelumab | Day 127 | 339 Microgram per milliliter | Standard Deviation 41.4 |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 10.0 mg/kg | Dose Expansion Phase: Serum Concentration at End of Infusion (CEOI) of Avelumab | Day 169 | 287 Microgram per milliliter | — |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 10.0 mg/kg | Dose Expansion Phase: Serum Concentration at End of Infusion (CEOI) of Avelumab | Day 15 | 305 Microgram per milliliter | Standard Deviation 88.1 |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 10.0 mg/kg | Dose Expansion Phase: Serum Concentration at End of Infusion (CEOI) of Avelumab | Day 29 | 291 Microgram per milliliter | Standard Deviation 60.3 |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 10.0 mg/kg | Dose Expansion Phase: Serum Concentration at End of Infusion (CEOI) of Avelumab | Day 43 | 294 Microgram per milliliter | Standard Deviation 57.4 |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 10.0 mg/kg | Dose Expansion Phase: Serum Concentration at End of Infusion (CEOI) of Avelumab | Day 85 | 348 Microgram per milliliter | Standard Deviation 65.6 |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 10.0 mg/kg | Dose Expansion Phase: Serum Concentration at End of Infusion (CEOI) of Avelumab | Day 1 | 343 Microgram per milliliter | Standard Deviation 117 |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 20.0 mg/kg | Dose Expansion Phase: Serum Concentration at End of Infusion (CEOI) of Avelumab | Day 169 | 235 Microgram per milliliter | — |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 20.0 mg/kg | Dose Expansion Phase: Serum Concentration at End of Infusion (CEOI) of Avelumab | Day 85 | 252 Microgram per milliliter | Standard Deviation 78.9 |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 20.0 mg/kg | Dose Expansion Phase: Serum Concentration at End of Infusion (CEOI) of Avelumab | Day 43 | 255 Microgram per milliliter | Standard Deviation 69.7 |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 20.0 mg/kg | Dose Expansion Phase: Serum Concentration at End of Infusion (CEOI) of Avelumab | Day 1 | 239 Microgram per milliliter | Standard Deviation 50.2 |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 10.0 mg/kg Weekly | Dose Expansion Phase: Serum Concentration at End of Infusion (CEOI) of Avelumab | Day 85 | 263 Microgram per milliliter | Standard Deviation 66.4 |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 10.0 mg/kg Weekly | Dose Expansion Phase: Serum Concentration at End of Infusion (CEOI) of Avelumab | Day 169 | 233 Microgram per milliliter | Standard Deviation 90.4 |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 10.0 mg/kg Weekly | Dose Expansion Phase: Serum Concentration at End of Infusion (CEOI) of Avelumab | Day 1 | 247 Microgram per milliliter | Standard Deviation 77.3 |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 10.0 mg/kg Weekly | Dose Expansion Phase: Serum Concentration at End of Infusion (CEOI) of Avelumab | Day 43 | 268 Microgram per milliliter | Standard Deviation 72 |
| Primary Expansion Cohort: NSCLC, Post-platinum Doublet | Dose Expansion Phase: Serum Concentration at End of Infusion (CEOI) of Avelumab | Day 1 | 224 Microgram per milliliter | Standard Deviation 55.4 |
| Primary Expansion Cohort: NSCLC, Post-platinum Doublet | Dose Expansion Phase: Serum Concentration at End of Infusion (CEOI) of Avelumab | Day 169 | 313 Microgram per milliliter | Standard Deviation 59.3 |
| Primary Expansion Cohort: NSCLC, Post-platinum Doublet | Dose Expansion Phase: Serum Concentration at End of Infusion (CEOI) of Avelumab | Day 43 | 241 Microgram per milliliter | Standard Deviation 58.1 |
| Primary Expansion Cohort: NSCLC, Post-platinum Doublet | Dose Expansion Phase: Serum Concentration at End of Infusion (CEOI) of Avelumab | Day 85 | 247 Microgram per milliliter | Standard Deviation 66.4 |
| Primary Expansion Cohort: NSCLC, First Line | Dose Expansion Phase: Serum Concentration at End of Infusion (CEOI) of Avelumab | Day 43 | 240 Microgram per milliliter | Standard Deviation 93.1 |
| Primary Expansion Cohort: NSCLC, First Line | Dose Expansion Phase: Serum Concentration at End of Infusion (CEOI) of Avelumab | Day 1 | 241 Microgram per milliliter | Standard Deviation 75 |
| Primary Expansion Cohort: NSCLC, First Line | Dose Expansion Phase: Serum Concentration at End of Infusion (CEOI) of Avelumab | Day 85 | 237 Microgram per milliliter | Standard Deviation 5.54 |
| Primary Expansion Cohort: Metastatic Breast Cancer | Dose Expansion Phase: Serum Concentration at End of Infusion (CEOI) of Avelumab | Day 85 | 255 Microgram per milliliter | Standard Deviation 57.7 |
| Primary Expansion Cohort: Metastatic Breast Cancer | Dose Expansion Phase: Serum Concentration at End of Infusion (CEOI) of Avelumab | Day 43 | 249 Microgram per milliliter | Standard Deviation 105 |
| Primary Expansion Cohort: Metastatic Breast Cancer | Dose Expansion Phase: Serum Concentration at End of Infusion (CEOI) of Avelumab | Day 1 | 212 Microgram per milliliter | Standard Deviation 47.6 |
| Primary Expansion Cohort: Metastatic Breast Cancer | Dose Expansion Phase: Serum Concentration at End of Infusion (CEOI) of Avelumab | Day 169 | 245 Microgram per milliliter | Standard Deviation 51.7 |
Efficacy Expansion Cohorts: Duration of Response According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 as Per Independent Endpoint Review Committee (IERC)
Duration of response according to modified irRC, per investigator assessment was calculated for each participant with a confirmed response (immune-related complete response \[irCR\] or immune-related partial response \[irPR\]) as the time from the first observation of response to the first observation of documented disease progression (or death within 12 weeks of the last tumor assessment). irCR: Complete disappearance of all tumor lesions (both index and non-index lesions with no new measurable/unmeasurable lesions). irPR: At least 30% reduction from baseline in the sum of the longest diameter (SLD) of all lesions). Results were calculated based on Kaplan-Meier estimates.
Time frame: Efficacy Expansion: Baseline up to Day 1072
Population: FAS included all participants who have received at least 1 dose of study treatment. Here Overall number of participants analyzed signifies those who were evaluable for this outcome measure. This outcome measure was planned to be analyzed in Efficacy expansion cohorts only.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 1.0 mg/kg | Efficacy Expansion Cohorts: Duration of Response According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 as Per Independent Endpoint Review Committee (IERC) | NA Months |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 3.0 mg/kg | Efficacy Expansion Cohorts: Duration of Response According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 as Per Independent Endpoint Review Committee (IERC) | NA Months |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 10.0 mg/kg | Efficacy Expansion Cohorts: Duration of Response According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 as Per Independent Endpoint Review Committee (IERC) | NA Months |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 20.0 mg/kg | Efficacy Expansion Cohorts: Duration of Response According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 as Per Independent Endpoint Review Committee (IERC) | NA Months |
Efficacy Expansion Cohorts: Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Time According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version (RECIST) 1.1 as Per Independent Endpoint Review Committee (IERC)
The PFS time (based on IERC), according to the RECIST 1.1, was defined as the time from first administration of study treatment until first documentation of progressive disease (PD) or death when death occurred within 12 weeks of the last tumor assessment or first administration of study treatment (whichever was later). PD was defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of longest diameter (SLD), taking as reference the smallest SLD recorded from baseline or the appearance of 1 or more new lesions and unequivocal progression of non-target lesions. The analysis of PFS was performed with a Kaplan-Meier method.
Time frame: Efficacy Expansion: Baseline up to Day 1072
Population: FAS included all participants who have received at least 1 dose of study treatment. Here Overall number of participants analyzed signifies those who were evaluable for this outcome measure. This outcome measure was planned to be analyzed in Efficacy expansion cohorts only.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 1.0 mg/kg | Efficacy Expansion Cohorts: Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Time According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version (RECIST) 1.1 as Per Independent Endpoint Review Committee (IERC) | 1.87 Months |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 3.0 mg/kg | Efficacy Expansion Cohorts: Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Time According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version (RECIST) 1.1 as Per Independent Endpoint Review Committee (IERC) | 1.45 Months |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 10.0 mg/kg | Efficacy Expansion Cohorts: Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Time According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version (RECIST) 1.1 as Per Independent Endpoint Review Committee (IERC) | 1.31 Months |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 20.0 mg/kg | Efficacy Expansion Cohorts: Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Time According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version (RECIST) 1.1 as Per Independent Endpoint Review Committee (IERC) | 1.41 Months |
Primary Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Unconfirmed Response at Week 13 According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1
The response criteria evaluation was carried out according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1. CR and PR did not need to be confirmed by a subsequent tumor assessment due to blinded central assessment. CR: Disappearance of all target lesions since baseline; PR: At least a 30% decrease in the sum of the diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters; SD: Neither sufficient increase to qualify for PD nor sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR and PD: at least a 20% increase in SLD, taking as reference smallest SLD recorded from baseline/appearance of 1or more new lesions and unequivocal progression of non-target lesions. Number of participants with unconfirmed response at week 13 according to response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST) version 1.1 were reported.
Time frame: Week 13
Population: Efficacy analysis set included all participants who have received at least 1 dose of study treatment and have measurable disease at baseline according to investigator assessment. This outcome measure was planned to be analyzed in Primary expansion cohorts only
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 1.0 mg/kg | Primary Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Unconfirmed Response at Week 13 According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 | Unconfirmed Complete Response | 2 Participants |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 1.0 mg/kg | Primary Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Unconfirmed Response at Week 13 According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 | Non-evaluable | 24 Participants |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 1.0 mg/kg | Primary Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Unconfirmed Response at Week 13 According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 | Unconfirmed Partial Response | 28 Participants |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 1.0 mg/kg | Primary Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Unconfirmed Response at Week 13 According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 | Unconfirmed Stable Disease | 62 Participants |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 1.0 mg/kg | Primary Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Unconfirmed Response at Week 13 According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 | Unconfirmed Progressive Disease | 68 Participants |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 3.0 mg/kg | Primary Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Unconfirmed Response at Week 13 According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 | Unconfirmed Complete Response | 1 Participants |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 3.0 mg/kg | Primary Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Unconfirmed Response at Week 13 According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 | Unconfirmed Partial Response | 24 Participants |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 3.0 mg/kg | Primary Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Unconfirmed Response at Week 13 According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 | Non-evaluable | 49 Participants |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 3.0 mg/kg | Primary Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Unconfirmed Response at Week 13 According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 | Unconfirmed Progressive Disease | 28 Participants |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 3.0 mg/kg | Primary Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Unconfirmed Response at Week 13 According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 | Unconfirmed Stable Disease | 54 Participants |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 10.0 mg/kg | Primary Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Unconfirmed Response at Week 13 According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 | Non-evaluable | 15 Participants |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 10.0 mg/kg | Primary Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Unconfirmed Response at Week 13 According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 | Unconfirmed Complete Response | 1 Participants |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 10.0 mg/kg | Primary Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Unconfirmed Response at Week 13 According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 | Unconfirmed Partial Response | 7 Participants |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 10.0 mg/kg | Primary Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Unconfirmed Response at Week 13 According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 | Unconfirmed Progressive Disease | 107 Participants |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 10.0 mg/kg | Primary Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Unconfirmed Response at Week 13 According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 | Unconfirmed Stable Disease | 38 Participants |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 20.0 mg/kg | Primary Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Unconfirmed Response at Week 13 According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 | Unconfirmed Complete Response | 0 Participants |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 20.0 mg/kg | Primary Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Unconfirmed Response at Week 13 According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 | Unconfirmed Stable Disease | 11 Participants |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 20.0 mg/kg | Primary Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Unconfirmed Response at Week 13 According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 | Unconfirmed Partial Response | 6 Participants |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 20.0 mg/kg | Primary Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Unconfirmed Response at Week 13 According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 | Unconfirmed Progressive Disease | 37 Participants |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 20.0 mg/kg | Primary Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Unconfirmed Response at Week 13 According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 | Non-evaluable | 6 Participants |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 10.0 mg/kg Weekly | Primary Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Unconfirmed Response at Week 13 According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 | Unconfirmed Progressive Disease | 31 Participants |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 10.0 mg/kg Weekly | Primary Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Unconfirmed Response at Week 13 According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 | Non-evaluable | 8 Participants |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 10.0 mg/kg Weekly | Primary Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Unconfirmed Response at Week 13 According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 | Unconfirmed Complete Response | 2 Participants |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 10.0 mg/kg Weekly | Primary Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Unconfirmed Response at Week 13 According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 | Unconfirmed Stable Disease | 44 Participants |
| Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 10.0 mg/kg Weekly | Primary Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Unconfirmed Response at Week 13 According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 | Unconfirmed Partial Response | 5 Participants |