Skip to content

Avelumab in Metastatic or Locally Advanced Solid Tumors (JAVELIN Solid Tumor)

A Phase I, Open-label, Multiple-ascending Dose Trial to Investigate the Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics, Biological and Clinical Activity of Avelumab (MSB0010718C) in Subjects With Metastatic or Locally Advanced Solid Tumors and Expansion to Selected Indications

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01772004
Enrollment
1756
Registered
2013-01-21
Start date
2013-01-31
Completion date
2019-12-16
Last updated
2021-12-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Solid Tumors

Keywords

Solid Tumors, MSB0010718C, Phase 1, Pharmacokinetic, anti PD-L1, Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), Metastatic breast cancer (MBC), Gastric and gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) cancer, Ovarian cancer, Colorectal cancer (CRC), Castrate-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC), Melanoma, Urothelial carcinoma, Bladder cancer, Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC), Renal cell carcinoma (RCC), Adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC)

Brief summary

This is a Phase 1, open-label, dose-escalation trial of avelumab \[antibody targeting programmed death ligand 1 (anti PD-L1)\] with consecutive parallel group expansion in participants with selected tumor indications. New recruitment is open for all active cohorts. Active cohorts: Escalation revised dosing regimen cohort. Closed cohorts: Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC, first line), NSCLC (post-platinum), metastatic breast cancer (MBC), colorectal cancer (CRC), urothelial carcinoma (secondary), mesothelioma, gastric/GEJ cancer (first line switch maintenance and second line), and ovarian cancer (secondary and platinum refractory + liposomal doxorubicin), renal cell carcinoma (second line) melanoma and head, neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC), castrate-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC), adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC) urothelial carcinoma (efficacy), gastric/gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) cancer (third line), renal cell carcinoma (RCC, first line) and escalation phase .

Interventions

DRUGAvelumab

Participants received intravenous infusion of Avelumab in dose escalation and expansion cohorts until confirmed progression, unacceptable toxicity, or any reason for withdrawal from the trial or IMP occurs.

Sponsors

Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
EMD Serono Research & Development Institute, Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SEQUENTIAL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

for dose escalation and expansion phase: * Signed written informed consent * Male or female participants aged greater than or equal to 18 years * Participants must have histologically or cytologically proven metastatic or locally advanced solid tumors, for which no standard therapy exists or standard therapy has failed. Availability of tumor archival material or fresh biopsies is optional for participants in dose escalation * Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0 to 1 at trial entry and an estimated life expectancy of at least 3 months * Disease must be measurable with at least 1 uni-dimensional measurable lesion by RECIST 1.1, except for participants with metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) or metastatic breast cancer (MBC) who may be enrolled with objective evidence of disease without a measureable lesion * Adequate hematological, hepatic and renal function as defined in the protocol * Effective contraception for both male and female participants if the risk of conception exists * Other protocol defined inclusion criteria could apply Inclusion Criteria for expansion phase: * Participants must have relapsed, refractory, or progressive disease following last line of treatment (with the exception of the gastric and gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) cancer cohort, which does not require progression). Availability of tumor archival material or fresh biopsies (excluding bone biopsies) is mandatory for eligibility in the expansion cohorts. For participants in the MBC cohort, the biopsy or surgical specimen must have been collected within 90 days prior to the first investigational medicinal product (IMP) administration. Specifically, the following will be required: * NSCLC post platinum doublet: Histologically or cytologically confirmed stage IIIB or stage IV NSCLC that has progressed after 1 line of platinum-containing doublet chemotherapy. Participants should have received only 1 line of platinum-containing treatment for metastatic disease (i.e., adjuvant treatment with a platinum-containing regimen is not sufficient for eligibility because not received in the context of a metastatic disease). Participants in the NSCLC cohort will only be enrolled in USA * NSCLC first line: Stage IV (per 7th International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer \[IASLC\] classification) or recurrent NSCLC that is histologically proven. Participants must not have received treatment for their metastatic or recurrent disease. No activating epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation nor ALK translocation/re-arrangement * Gastric and GEJ cancer: Histologically confirmed, unresectable locally advanced or metastatic adenocarcinoma of the gastric and gastro-esophageal junction, treated with first-line chemotherapy combination with or without disease progression. Participants should have received no more than 1 line of treatment for metastatic disease. Participants should not have been treated with trastuzumab (but can be Human Epidermal growth factor Receptor 2 \[HER2\] positive). Participants who received any platinum containing doublet or triplet as a neoadjuvant chemotherapy strategy, but are not ultimately candidates for surgery will also be eligible, as long as they did not have progressive disease after completion of the neoadjuvant chemotherapy. In addition, participants with gastric cancer can enter in the study if their white blood cell (WBC) and lymphocyte count is as defined in the protocol * MBC: Participants must have histologically confirmed locally advanced or MBC and have tumor that is refractory to or progressive after standard of care therapy. Participants must have received no more than 3 prior lines of cytotoxic therapy for metastatic disease. Participants must have received a taxane and an anthracycline, unless contra-indicated * Secondary expansion cohorts: Metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), Metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), melanoma, ovarian cancer, ACC, mesothelioma, urothelial carcinoma and renal cell carcinoma as defined in the protocol * Efficacy expansion cohorts: Gastric and GEJ cancer (third line), ovarian cancer (platinum Refractory + liposomal doxorubicin), urothelial carcinoma, and HNSCC as defined in the protocol * Other protocol defined inclusion criteria for expansion phase could apply

Exclusion criteria

for dose escalation and expansion phase: * Concurrent treatment with a non-permitted drug * Prior therapy with specific antibody/drug targeting T cell co-regulatory proteins (immune checkpoints) * Concurrent anticancer treatment, major surgery, or use of any investigational drug within 28 days before the start of trial treatment; or concurrent systemic therapy with immunosuppressive agents, use of hormonal agents within 7 days before the start of trial treatment as defined in the protocol. Note: Participants receiving bisphosphonate or denosumab are eligible provided treatment was initiated at least 14 days before the first dose of avelumab. * Previous malignant disease other than the target malignancy to be investigated in this trial within the last 5 years with the exception of basal or squamous cell carcinoma of the skin or cervical carcinoma in situ * Rapidly progressive disease (for example, tumor lysis syndrome) * Active or history of central nervous system metastases * Receipt of any organ transplantation including allogeneic stem-cell transplantation * Significant acute or chronic infections as defined in the protocol * Active or history of any autoimmune disease (Participants with diabetes Type 1, vitiligo, psoriasis, hypo- or hyperthyroid disease not requiring immunosuppressive treatment are eligible) or immunodeficiencies * Known severe hypersensitivity reactions to monoclonal antibodies, any history of anaphylaxis, or uncontrolled asthma * Persisting toxicity related to prior therapy greater than Grade 1 NCI-CTCAE v4.0, however sensory neuropathy less than or equal to Grade 2 is acceptable * Pregnancy or lactation period * Known alcohol or drug abuse * Clinically significant (that is, active) cardiovascular disease * All other significant diseases (for example, inflammatory bowel disease), which, in the opinion of the investigator, might impair the Participant's tolerance of trial treatment * Any psychiatric condition that would prohibit the understanding or rendering of informed consent * Legal incapacity or limited legal capacity * Non-oncology vaccine therapies for prevention of infection disease (for example, seasonal flu vaccine, human papilloma virus vaccine) within 4 weeks of study drug administration. Vaccination while on study is also prohibited except for administration of the inactivated influenza vaccine

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Dose Escalation Cohort (Excluding Once Weekly Avelumab 10 mg/kg Cohort): Number of Participants Experiencing Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLTs)Dose Escalation: Baseline up to Week 3DLT: defined using National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events Version 4.0, as any one of following: any Grade (Gr) \>=3toxicity that is possibly/probably/ definitely related to avelumab, except for any of following: Gr 3 infusion-related reaction resolving within 6 hours and controlled with medical management, Transient Gr 3 flu-like symptoms/fever, which is controlled with medical management, Transient Gr 3 fatigue, local reactions, headache, nausea, emesis that resolves to \<= Gr 1, Gr3 diarrhea, Gr 3 skin toxicity, Gr 3 liver function test increase that resolves to \<= Gr1 in \< 7 days after medical management has been initiated, Single laboratory values out of normal range that were unlikely related to study treatment according to investigator, did not have any clinical correlate, and resolved to \<= Gr1 within 7 days with adequate medical management and tumor flare phenomenon defined as local pain, irritation/rash localized at sites of known/suspected tumor.
Efficacy Expansion Cohort (Ovarian Cancer): Number of Participants With Confirmed Best Overall Response (BOR) as Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1), as Adjudicated by Independent Endpoint Review Committee (IERC)Ovarian Cancer Efficacy Expansion: Baseline up to Day 620Confirmed BOR was determined according to RECIST 1.1 and as adjudicated by an Independent Endpoint Review Committee (IERC) and defined as best response of any of complete response (CR), partial response (PR), stable disease (SD) and progressive disease (PD) recorded from date of randomization until disease progression/recurrence (taking smallest measurement recorded since start of treatment as reference). CR: Disappearance of all evidence of target/non-target lesions. PR: At least 30%reduction from baseline in sum of longest diameter (SLD) of all lesions. SD: Neither sufficient increase to qualify for PD nor sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR. PD: at least a 20% increase in SLD, taking as reference smallest SLD recorded from baseline/appearance of 1or more new lesions and unequivocal progression of non-target lesions.
Efficacy Expansion Cohort(Urothelial Carcinoma): Number of Participants With Confirmed Best Overall Response (BOR) as Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1), as Adjudicated by Independent Endpoint Review Committee (IERC)Urothelial Carcinoma Efficacy Expansion: Baseline up to Day 931Confirmed BOR was determined according to RECIST 1.1 and as adjudicated by an Independent Endpoint Review Committee (IERC) and defined as best response of any of complete response (CR), partial response (PR), stable disease (SD) and progressive disease (PD) recorded from date of randomization until disease progression/recurrence (taking smallest measurement recorded since start of treatment as reference). CR: Disappearance of all evidence of target/non-target lesions. PR: At least 30% reduction from baseline in sum of longest diameter (SLD) of all lesions. SD: Neither sufficient increase to qualify for PD nor sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR. PD: at least a 20% increase in SLD, taking as reference smallest SLD recorded from baseline/appearance of 1 or more new lesions and unequivocal progression of non-target lesions.
Efficacy Expansion Cohort (GC/GEJC, Third Line): Number of Participants With Confirmed Best Overall Response (BOR) as Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1), as Adjudicated by Independent Endpoint Review Committee (IERC)GC/GEJC, Third Line Efficacy Expansion: Baseline up to Day 871Confirmed BOR was determined according to RECIST 1.1 and as adjudicated by an Independent Endpoint Review Committee (IERC) and defined as best response of any of complete response (CR), partial response (PR), stable disease (SD) and progressive disease (PD) recorded from date of randomization until disease progression/recurrence (taking smallest measurement recorded since start of treatment as reference). CR: Disappearance of all evidence of target/non-target lesions. PR: At least 30% reduction from baseline in sum of longest diameter (SLD) of all lesions. SD: Neither sufficient increase to qualify for PD nor sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR. PD: at least a 20% increase in SLD, taking as reference smallest SLD recorded from baseline/appearance of 1 or more new lesions and unequivocal progression of non-target lesions.
Efficacy Expansion Cohort (HNSCC): Number of Participants With Confirmed Best Overall Response (BOR) as Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1), as Adjudicated by Independent Endpoint Review Committee (IERC)HNSCC Efficacy Expansion: Baseline up to Day 1072Confirmed BOR was determined according to RECIST 1.1 and as adjudicated by an Independent Endpoint Review Committee (IERC) and defined as best response of any of complete response (CR), partial response (PR), stable disease (SD) and progressive disease (PD) recorded from date of randomization until disease progression/recurrence (taking smallest measurement recorded since start of treatment as reference). CR: Disappearance of all evidence of target/non-target lesions. PR: At least 30%reduction from baseline in sum of longest diameter (SLD) of all lesions. SD: Neither sufficient increase to qualify for PD nor sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR. PD: at least a 20% increase in SLD, taking as reference smallest SLD recorded from baseline/appearance of 1or more new lesions and unequivocal progression of non-target lesions.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Dose Escalation Cohort (Excluding Once Weekly Avelumab 10 mg/kg Cohort): Time to Reach Maximum Observed Serum Concentration (Tmax) of AvelumabPre-infusion, at end of 1-hour infusion (Day 1), 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6,12, 24, 36, 48 hours after end of infusionTmax is time to reach maximum observed serum concentration obtained directly from the concentration versus time curve.
Dose Escalation Cohort (Excluding Once Weekly Avelumab 10 mg/kg Cohort): Apparent Terminal Half-Life (t1/2) of AvelumabPre-infusion, at end of 1-hour infusion (Day 1), 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6,12, 24, 36, 48 hours after end of infusionApparent terminal half-life was defined as the time required for the serum concentration of drug to decrease 50 percent in the final stage of its elimination.
Dose Expansion Phase: Serum Concentration at End of Infusion (CEOI) of AvelumabAt Day 1, 15, 29, 43, 85, 127 and 169Serum concentration at end of infusion (CEOI) of Avelumab is reported.
Dose Expansion Phase: Minimum Serum Post-dose (Ctrough) Concentration of AvelumabAt Day 15, 29, 43, 57, 71, 85, 99, 127 and 169Serum Ctrough concentration of Avelumab is reported.
Dose Escalation Cohort (Excluding Once Weekly Avelumab 10 mg/kg Cohort): Number of Participants With Immune Related Best Overall Response (irBOR) According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC)Dose Escalation: Baseline up to Day 1023irBOR defined as best response of any of immune related complete response (irCR), immune related partial response (irPR), immune related stable disease (irSD) and immune related progressive disease (irPD) recorded from baseline until immune related disease progression and determined according to modified irRC per investigator assessment. irCR: Complete disappearance of all tumor lesions (both index and non-index lesions with no new measurable/unmeasurable lesions). irPR: At least 30% reduction from baseline in the sum of the longest diameter (SLD) of all lesions). irSD: SLD of target and new measurable lesions neither irCR, irPR, or irPD. irPD: SLD of target and new measurable lesions increases greater than or equal to \[\>=\] 20%, confirmed by a repeat, consecutive observations at least 4 weeks from the date first documented. Number of participants with immune-related best overall response in each category (irCR, irPR, irSD, irPD) was reported.
Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Immune Related Best Overall Response (irBOR) According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC)Dose Expansion: Baseline up to Day 2023irBOR defined as best response of any of immune related complete response (irCR), immune related partial response (irPR), immune related stable disease (irSD) and immune related progressive disease (irPD) recorded from baseline until immune related disease progression and determined according to modified irRC per investigator assessment. irCR: Complete disappearance of all tumor lesions (both index and non-index lesions with no new measurable/unmeasurable lesions). irPR: At least 30% reduction from baseline in the sum of the longest diameter (SLD) of all lesions). irSD: SLD of target and new measurable lesions neither irCR, irPR, or irPD. irPD: SLD of target and new measurable lesions increases greater than or equal to \[\>=\] 20%, confirmed by a repeat, consecutive observations at least 4 weeks from the date first documented. Number of participants with immune-related best overall response in each category (irCR, irPR, irSD, irPD) was reported.
Dose Escalation Cohort: Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1Dose Escalation: Baseline up to Day 2511BOR was determined according to RECIST v1.1 and as per investigator assessment. BOR is defined as the best response of any of complete response (CR), partial response (PR), stable disease (SD) and progressive disease (PD) recorded from date of randomization until disease progression or recurrence (taking the smallest measurement recorded since start of treatment as reference). CR: Disappearance of all evidence of target and non-target lesions. PR: At least 30 percent (%) reduction from baseline in the sum of the longest diameter (SLD) of all lesions. SD =Neither sufficient increase to qualify for PD nor sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR. PD is defined as at least a 20 % increase in the SLD, taking as reference the smallest SLD recorded from baseline or appearance of 1 or more new lesions and unequivocal progression of non-target lesions. Number of participants with best overall response in each category (CR, PR, SD, PD) was reported.
Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1Dose Expansion: Baseline up to Day 2023BOR was determined according to RECIST v1.1 and as per investigator assessment. BOR is defined as the best response of any of complete response (CR), partial response (PR), stable disease (SD) and progressive disease (PD) recorded from date of randomization until disease progression or recurrence (taking the smallest measurement recorded since start of treatment as reference). CR: Disappearance of all evidence of target and non-target lesions. PR: At least 30 percent (%) reduction from baseline in the sum of the longest diameter (SLD) of all lesions. SD = Neither sufficient increase to qualify for PD nor sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR. PD is defined as at least a 20 % increase in the SLD, taking as reference the smallest SLD recorded from baseline or appearance of 1 or more new lesions and unequivocal progression of non-target lesions. Number of participants with best overall response in each category (CR, PR, SD, PD) was reported.
Dose Expansion Cohort (Secondary Urothelial Carcinoma Cohort): Number of Participants With Confirmed Best Overall Response According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 as Adjudicated by an Independent Endpoint Review CommitteeSecondary Urothelial Carcinoma Dose Expansion: Baseline up to Day 931Confirmed Best Overall Response (BOR) was determined according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) v1.1and as adjudicated by an Independent Endpoint Review Committee (IERC) is defined as best response of any of complete response (CR), partial response (PR), stable disease (SD) and progressive disease (PD) recorded from date of randomization until disease progression/recurrence (taking smallest measurement recorded since start of treatment as reference). CR: Disappearance of all evidence of target/non-target lesions. PR: At least 30% reduction from baseline in sum of longest diameter (SLD) of all lesions. SD: Neither sufficient increase to qualify for PD nor sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR. PD: at least a 20% increase in SLD, taking as reference smallest SLD recorded from baseline/appearance of 1or more new lesions and unequivocal progression of non-target lesions. Number of participants with BOR in each category (CR, PR, SD, PD) were reported.
Dose Expansion Cohort: Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Time According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version (RECIST) 1.1Dose Expansion: Baseline up to Day 2023The PFS time (based on investigator assessments), according to the RECIST 1.1, was defined as the time from first administration of study treatment until first documentation of progressive disease (PD) or death when death occurred within 12 weeks of the last tumor assessment or first administration of study treatment (whichever was later). PD was defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of longest diameter (SLD), taking as reference the smallest SLD recorded from baseline or the appearance of 1 or more new lesions and unequivocal progression of non-target lesions. The analysis of PFS was performed with a Kaplan-Meier method.
Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per SeverityUp to Day 2511Adverse event(AE): any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with use of study drug, whether or not related to study drug. A serious adverse event(SAE) was an AE that resulted in any of following outcomes: death; life threatening; persistent/significant disability/incapacity; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; congenital anomaly/birth defect or was otherwise considered medically important. Treatment-emergent events were events between first dose of study drug that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pre-treatment state up to 30 days after last administration.TEAEs included both Serious TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs. Severity of TEAEs were graded using National Cancer Institute-Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) version 4.0 toxicity grades, as follows: Grade 1= Mild, Grade 2= Moderate, Grade 3= Severe, Grade 4= Life-threatening and Grade 5= Death.
Dose Expansion Cohort: Overall Survival (OS) TimeDose Expansion: Baseline up to Day 2023Overall survival time was measured as time in months first administration of trial treatment to death. The analysis of OS time was performed with a Kaplan-Meier method.
Dose Escalation Cohort (Excluding Once Weekly Avelumab 10 mg/kg Cohort): Programmed Death Ligand 1 (PD-L1) Receptor OccupancyPre-infusion on Day 1; 48 hours after infusion on Day 3; Pre-infusion on Days 15, 43, and 85Percentage of PD-L1 receptors occupied by avelumab on human lymphocytes (CD3+ T-cells) was assessed by flow cytometry on peripheral blood mononuclear cell (PBMC) samples. Greater than or equal to \[\>=\] 85 percent \[%\] of cell viability was required for reliable receptor occupancy assessment.
Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Positive Programmed Death Receptor-1 Ligand-1 (PD-L1) Biomarker Expression in Tumor TissueDose Expansion: Baseline up to Day 2023PD-L1 assessment was performed using immunohistochemistry. PD-L1 expression status was classified as positive or negative based on the following cut-offs: For tumor cells: Participants were considered PD-L1 expression positive (negative): - if at least (less than) 5% of the tumor cells show PD-L1 membrane staining \>= 1+, respectively. This was used as the primary cut-off; - if at least (less than) 25% of the tumor cells show PD-L1 membrane staining \>=2+, respectively. This was considered as secondary cut-off; - if at least (less than) 1% of the tumor cells show PD-L1 membrane staining \>=1+, respectively. This was used as the tertiary cut-off; - if at least (less than) 50% of the tumor cells show PD-L1 membrane staining \>=1+, respectively. This was used as the '50% cut-off'; - if at least (less than) 80% of the tumor cells show PD-L1 membrane staining ≥1+, respectively. This was used as the '80% cut-off'.
Primary Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Unconfirmed Response at Week 13 According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1Week 13The response criteria evaluation was carried out according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1. CR and PR did not need to be confirmed by a subsequent tumor assessment due to blinded central assessment. CR: Disappearance of all target lesions since baseline; PR: At least a 30% decrease in the sum of the diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters; SD: Neither sufficient increase to qualify for PD nor sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR and PD: at least a 20% increase in SLD, taking as reference smallest SLD recorded from baseline/appearance of 1or more new lesions and unequivocal progression of non-target lesions. Number of participants with unconfirmed response at week 13 according to response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST) version 1.1 were reported.
Dose Expansion Cohort: Duration of Response According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 Per Investigator AssessmentDose Expansion: Baseline up to Day 2023Duration of response according to RECIST 1.1, per investigator assessment was calculated for each participant with a confirmed response (complete response \[CR\] or partial response \[PR\]) as the time from the first observation of response to the first observation of documented disease progression (or death within 12 weeks of the last tumor assessment). CR: Disappearance of all evidence of target and non-target lesions. PR: At least 30 percent (%) reduction from baseline in the sum of the longest diameter (SLD) of all lesions. Results were calculated based on Kaplan-Meier estimates.
Dose Expansion Cohort: Duration of Response According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC) Per Investigator AssessmentDose Expansion: Baseline up to Day 2023Duration of response according to modified irRC, per investigator assessment was calculated for each participant with a confirmed response (immune-related complete response \[irCR\] or immune-related partial response \[irPR\]) as the time from the first observation of response to the first observation of documented disease progression (or death within 12 weeks of the last tumor assessment). irCR: Complete disappearance of all tumor lesions (both index and non-index lesions with no new measurable/unmeasurable lesions). irPR: At least 30% reduction from baseline in the sum of the longest diameter (SLD) of all lesions). Results were calculated based on Kaplan-Meier estimates.
Efficacy Expansion Cohorts: Duration of Response According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 as Per Independent Endpoint Review Committee (IERC)Efficacy Expansion: Baseline up to Day 1072Duration of response according to modified irRC, per investigator assessment was calculated for each participant with a confirmed response (immune-related complete response \[irCR\] or immune-related partial response \[irPR\]) as the time from the first observation of response to the first observation of documented disease progression (or death within 12 weeks of the last tumor assessment). irCR: Complete disappearance of all tumor lesions (both index and non-index lesions with no new measurable/unmeasurable lesions). irPR: At least 30% reduction from baseline in the sum of the longest diameter (SLD) of all lesions). Results were calculated based on Kaplan-Meier estimates.
Efficacy Expansion Cohorts: Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Time According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version (RECIST) 1.1 as Per Independent Endpoint Review Committee (IERC)Efficacy Expansion: Baseline up to Day 1072The PFS time (based on IERC), according to the RECIST 1.1, was defined as the time from first administration of study treatment until first documentation of progressive disease (PD) or death when death occurred within 12 weeks of the last tumor assessment or first administration of study treatment (whichever was later). PD was defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of longest diameter (SLD), taking as reference the smallest SLD recorded from baseline or the appearance of 1 or more new lesions and unequivocal progression of non-target lesions. The analysis of PFS was performed with a Kaplan-Meier method.
Dose Escalation Cohort (Excluding Once Weekly Avelumab 10 mg/kg Cohort): Number of Participants With at Least 1 Positive Anti Drug Antibodies (ADA)Dose Escalation: Baseline up to Day 1023Serum samples were analyzed by a validated electrochemiluminescence immunoassay to detect the presence of antidrug antibodies (ADA). Number of participants with ADA positive results for Avelumab were reported.
Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Atleast 1 Positive Anti Drug Antibodies (ADA) AssayDose Expansion: Baseline up to Day 2023Serum samples were analyzed by a validated electrochemiluminescence immunoassay to detect the presence of antidrug antibodies (ADA). Number of participants with ADA positive results for Avelumab were reported.
Dose Expansion Cohort: Immune Related Progression-Free Survival (irPFS) Time According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC)Dose Expansion: Baseline up to Day 2023The irPFS time was defined as the time from first administration of study treatment until first documentation of immune-related progressive disease (irPD) or death when death occurred within 12 weeks of the last tumor assessment or first administration of study treatment (whichever was later). irPD: sum of the longest diameters of target and new measurable lesions increases greater than or equal to \[\>=\] 20%, confirmed by a repeat, consecutive observations at least 4 weeks from the date first documented. The analysis of irPFS will be performed with a Kaplan-Meier method. Data for immune related progression-free survival time has been reported.
Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per SeverityBaseline up to Day 2511AE was defined as any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of study drug, whether or not related to study drug. Treatment-emergent events were the events between first dose of study drug that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pre-treatment state up to 30 days after last administration. TEAEs included both Serious TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs. Treatment related AE was defined as having a Possible or Related relationship to study treatment, as assessed by the Investigator. Severity of Treatment-Related TEAEs were graded using NCI-CTCAE version 4.0 toxicity grades, as follows: Grade 1= Mild, Grade 2= Moderate, Grade 3= Severe, Grade 4= Life-threatening and Grade 5= Death.
Dose Escalation Cohort (Excluding Once Weekly Avelumab 10 mg/kg Cohort): Area Under Serum Concentration-Time Curve From the Time of Dosing to the Time of the Last Observation (AUC0-t) of AvelumabPre-infusion, at end of 1-hour infusion (Day 1), 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6,12, 24, 36, 48 hours after end of infusionArea under the serum concentration versus time curve from time zero to the last sampling time t at which the concentration is at or above the lower limit of quantification (LLLQ). AUC(0-t) was calculated according to the mixed log-linear trapezoidal rule.
Dose Escalation Cohort (Excluding Once Weekly Avelumab 10 mg/kg Cohort): Area Under the Serum Concentration-Time Curve From Time Zero to Infinity (AUC0-infinity) of AvelumabPre-infusion, at end of 1-hour infusion (Day 1), 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6,12, 24, 36, 48 hours after end of infusionThe AUC(0-inf) was estimated by determining the total area under the curve of the concentration versus time curve extrapolated to infinity.
Dose Escalation Cohort (Excluding Once Weekly Avelumab 10 mg/kg Cohort): Maximum Observed Serum Concentration (Cmax) of AvelumabPre-infusion, at end of 1-hour infusion (Day 1), 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6,12, 24, 36, 48 hours after end of infusionCmax is the maximum observed serum concentration obtained directly from the concentration versus time curve.

Countries

Belgium, Czechia, France, Germany, Poland, South Korea, Taiwan, United Kingdom, United States

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

First participant signed informed consent: 31 January 2013, Last Participant Last Visit: 16 December 2019.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 1.0 mg/kg
Participants with metastatic or locally advanced solid tumors received intravenous infusion of Avelumab at a dose of 1.0 mg/kg once every 2 weeks in dose escalation cohort until confirmed progression, unacceptable toxicity, or any reason for withdrawal from the trial or IMP occurs.
4
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 3.0 mg/kg
Participants with metastatic or locally advanced solid tumors received intravenous infusion of Avelumab at a dose of 3.0 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg) once every 2 weeks in dose escalation cohort until confirmed progression, unacceptable toxicity, or any reason for withdrawal from the trial or investigational medicinal product (IMP) occurs.
13
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 10.0 mg/kg
Participants with metastatic or locally advanced solid tumors received intravenous infusion of Avelumab at a dose of 10.0 mg/kg once every 2 weeks in dose escalation cohort until confirmed progression, unacceptable toxicity, or any reason for withdrawal from the trial or IMP occurs.
15
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 20.0 mg/kg
Participants with metastatic or locally advanced solid tumors received intravenous infusion of Avelumab at a dose of 20.0 mg/kg once every 2 weeks in dose escalation cohort until confirmed progression, unacceptable toxicity, or any reason for withdrawal from the trial or IMP occurs.
21
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 10.0 mg/kg Weekly
Participants with metastatic or locally advanced solid tumors received intravenous infusion of Avelumab at a dose of 10.0 mg/kg once weekly for the first 12 weeks and once every 2 weeks starting Week 13 in dose escalation cohort until confirmed progression, unacceptable toxicity, or any reason for withdrawal from the trial or IMP occurs.
8
Primary Expansion Cohort: NSCLC, Post-platinum Doublet
Participants with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), who had progressed after 1 line of platinum-containing doublet chemotherapy received intravenous infusion of Avelumab at a dose of 10.0 mg/kg once every 2 weeks in primary expansion cohort until confirmed progression, unacceptable toxicity, or any reason for withdrawal from the trial or IMP occurs.
184
Primary Expansion Cohort: NSCLC, First Line
Participants with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), first line received intravenous infusion of Avelumab at a dose of 10.0 mg/kg once every 2 weeks in primary expansion cohort until confirmed progression, unacceptable toxicity, or any reason for withdrawal from the trial or IMP occurs.
156
Primary Expansion Cohort: Metastatic Breast Cancer
Participants with metastatic breast cancer received intravenous infusion of Avelumab at a dose of 10.0 mg/kg once every 2 weeks in primary expansion cohort until confirmed progression, unacceptable toxicity, or any reason for withdrawal from the trial or IMP occurs.
168
Primary Expansion Cohort: GC/GEJC Progressed
Participants with gastric and gastroesophageal cancer who progressed on or after first-line chemotherapy received intravenous infusion of Avelumab at a dose of 10.0 mg/kg once every 2 weeks in primary expansion cohort until confirmed progression, unacceptable toxicity, or any reason for withdrawal from the trial or IMP occurs.
60
Primary Expansion Cohort: GC/GEJC Non Progressed
Participants with gastric and gastroesophageal cancer who non-progressed on or after first-line chemotherapy received intravenous infusion of Avelumab at a dose of 10.0 mg/kg once every 2 weeks in primary expansion cohort until confirmed progression, unacceptable toxicity, or any reason for withdrawal from the trial or IMP occurs.
90
Secondary Expansion Cohort: Colorectal Cancer
Participants with colorectal cancer received intravenous infusion of Avelumab at a dose of 10.0 mg/kg once every 2 weeks in secondary expansion cohort until confirmed progression, unacceptable toxicity, or any reason for withdrawal from the trial or IMP occurs.
21
Secondary Expansion Cohort: Castrate-resistant Prostate Cancer
Participants with castrate-resistant prostate cancer received intravenous infusion of Avelumab at a dose of 10.0 mg/kg once every 2 weeks in secondary expansion cohort until confirmed progression, unacceptable toxicity, or any reason for withdrawal from the trial or IMP occurs.
18
Secondary Expansion Cohort: Adrenocortical Carcinoma
Participants with adrenocortical carcinoma received intravenous infusion of Avelumab at a dose of 10.0 mg/kg once every 2 weeks in secondary expansion cohort until confirmed progression, unacceptable toxicity, or any reason for withdrawal from the trial or IMP occurs.
50
Secondary Expansion Cohort: Melanoma
Participants with melanoma received intravenous infusion of Avelumab at a dose of 10.0 mg/kg once every 2 weeks in secondary expansion cohort until confirmed progression, unacceptable toxicity, or any reason for withdrawal from the trial or IMP occurs.
51
Secondary Expansion Cohort: Mesothelioma
Participants with mesothelioma received intravenous infusion of Avelumab at a dose of 10.0 mg/kg once every 2 weeks in secondary expansion cohort until confirmed progression, unacceptable toxicity, or any reason for withdrawal from the trial or IMP occurs.
53
Secondary Expansion Cohort: Urothelial Carcinoma
Participants with urothelial carcinoma received intravenous infusion of Avelumab at a dose of 10.0 mg/kg once every 2 weeks in secondary expansion cohort until confirmed progression, unacceptable toxicity, or any reason for withdrawal from the trial or IMP occurs.
44
Secondary Expansion Cohort: Ovarian Cancer
Participants with ovarian carcinoma received intravenous infusion of Avelumab at a dose of 10.0 mg/kg once every 2 weeks in secondary expansion cohort until confirmed progression, unacceptable toxicity, or any reason for withdrawal from the trial or IMP occurs.
125
Secondary Expansion Cohort: Renal Cell Carcinoma (First Line)
Participants with Renal cell carcinoma received intravenous infusion of Avelumab at a dose of 10.0 mg/kg once every 2 weeks as a first-line therapy in secondary expansion cohort until confirmed progression, unacceptable toxicity, or any reason for withdrawal from the trial or IMP occurs.
62
Secondary Expansion Cohort: Renal Cell Carcinoma (Second Line)
Participants with Renal cell carcinoma who failed 1 prior systemic first-line regimen received intravenous infusion of Avelumab at a dose of 10.0 mg/kg once every 2 weeks as a second line treatment in secondary expansion cohort until confirmed progression, unacceptable toxicity, or any reason for withdrawal from the trial or IMP occurs.
20
Efficacy Expansion Cohort: Ovarian Cancer
Participants with ovarian carcinoma received intravenous infusion of Avelumab at a dose of 10.0 mg/kg once every 2 weeks in efficacy expansion cohort until confirmed progression, unacceptable toxicity, or any reason for withdrawal from the trial or IMP occurs.
103
Efficacy Expansion Cohort: Urothelial Carcinoma
Participants with urothelial carcinoma received intravenous infusion of Avelumab at a dose of 10.0 mg/kg once every 2 weeks in efficacy expansion cohort until confirmed progression, unacceptable toxicity, or any reason for withdrawal from the trial or IMP occurs.
205
Efficacy Expansion Cohort: GC/GEJC, Third Line
Participants with gastric (GC) and gastroesophageal junction cancer (GEJC) who have failed both a first-line chemotherapy regimen and subsequent ramucirumab therapy, received intravenous infusion of Avelumab at a dose of 10.0 mg/kg once every 2 weeks as a third-line treatment in efficacy expansion cohort until confirmed progression, unacceptable toxicity, or any reason for withdrawal from the trial or IMP occurs.
132
Efficacy Expansion Cohort: HNSCC
Participants with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) received intravenous infusion of Avelumab at a dose of 10.0 mg/kg once every 2 weeks in efficacy expansion cohort until confirmed progression, unacceptable toxicity, or any reason for withdrawal from the trial or IMP occurs.
153
Total1,756

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTotalDose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 3.0 mg/kgDose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 10.0 mg/kgDose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 20.0 mg/kgDose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 10.0 mg/kg WeeklyPrimary Expansion Cohort: NSCLC, Post-platinum DoubletPrimary Expansion Cohort: NSCLC, First LinePrimary Expansion Cohort: Metastatic Breast CancerPrimary Expansion Cohort: GC/GEJC ProgressedPrimary Expansion Cohort: GC/GEJC Non ProgressedSecondary Expansion Cohort: Colorectal CancerSecondary Expansion Cohort: Castrate-resistant Prostate CancerSecondary Expansion Cohort: Adrenocortical CarcinomaDose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 1.0 mg/kgSecondary Expansion Cohort: MelanomaSecondary Expansion Cohort: MesotheliomaSecondary Expansion Cohort: Urothelial CarcinomaSecondary Expansion Cohort: Ovarian CancerSecondary Expansion Cohort: Renal Cell Carcinoma (First Line)Secondary Expansion Cohort: Renal Cell Carcinoma (Second Line)Efficacy Expansion Cohort: Ovarian CancerEfficacy Expansion Cohort: Urothelial CarcinomaEfficacy Expansion Cohort: GC/GEJC, Third LineEfficacy Expansion Cohort: HNSCC
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
776 Participants4 Participants5 Participants3 Participants3 Participants94 Participants105 Participants28 Participants22 Participants29 Participants2 Participants11 Participants4 Participants1 Participants23 Participants33 Participants33 Participants51 Participants25 Participants13 Participants51 Participants139 Participants41 Participants56 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
980 Participants9 Participants10 Participants18 Participants5 Participants90 Participants51 Participants140 Participants38 Participants61 Participants19 Participants7 Participants46 Participants3 Participants28 Participants20 Participants11 Participants74 Participants37 Participants7 Participants52 Participants66 Participants91 Participants97 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
5 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants2 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants2 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
163 Participants0 Participants2 Participants0 Participants0 Participants5 Participants6 Participants3 Participants13 Participants35 Participants1 Participants0 Participants3 Participants1 Participants2 Participants0 Participants2 Participants1 Participants6 Participants0 Participants7 Participants15 Participants42 Participants19 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
91 Participants0 Participants2 Participants0 Participants3 Participants12 Participants12 Participants16 Participants4 Participants4 Participants2 Participants4 Participants1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants2 Participants3 Participants1 Participants1 Participants4 Participants9 Participants6 Participants4 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
4 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants2 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
183 Participants0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants6 Participants14 Participants8 Participants7 Participants7 Participants1 Participants2 Participants14 Participants0 Participants12 Participants10 Participants4 Participants5 Participants20 Participants0 Participants1 Participants25 Participants12 Participants34 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
1310 Participants13 Participants11 Participants20 Participants5 Participants159 Participants124 Participants141 Participants36 Participants44 Participants17 Participants12 Participants32 Participants3 Participants35 Participants43 Participants35 Participants114 Participants35 Participants19 Participants91 Participants155 Participants70 Participants96 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
861 Participants9 Participants8 Participants7 Participants6 Participants84 Participants73 Participants167 Participants14 Participants22 Participants7 Participants0 Participants26 Participants2 Participants17 Participants21 Participants14 Participants125 Participants19 Participants5 Participants103 Participants57 Participants47 Participants28 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
895 Participants4 Participants7 Participants14 Participants2 Participants100 Participants83 Participants1 Participants46 Participants68 Participants14 Participants18 Participants24 Participants2 Participants34 Participants32 Participants30 Participants0 Participants43 Participants15 Participants0 Participants148 Participants85 Participants125 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
EG004
affected / at risk
EG005
affected / at risk
EG006
affected / at risk
EG007
affected / at risk
EG008
affected / at risk
EG009
affected / at risk
EG010
affected / at risk
EG011
affected / at risk
EG012
affected / at risk
EG013
affected / at risk
EG014
affected / at risk
EG015
affected / at risk
EG016
affected / at risk
EG017
affected / at risk
EG018
affected / at risk
EG019
affected / at risk
EG020
affected / at risk
EG021
affected / at risk
EG022
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
4 / 411 / 1311 / 1516 / 212 / 8161 / 184124 / 156141 / 16850 / 6075 / 9018 / 217 / 1827 / 5025 / 5134 / 5331 / 4487 / 12517 / 6214 / 2071 / 103129 / 205118 / 132129 / 153
other
Total, other adverse events
4 / 413 / 1315 / 1521 / 218 / 8178 / 184152 / 156159 / 16858 / 6086 / 9020 / 2117 / 1850 / 5050 / 5153 / 5344 / 44122 / 12562 / 6219 / 20102 / 103202 / 205125 / 132143 / 153
serious
Total, serious adverse events
3 / 46 / 136 / 158 / 210 / 895 / 18480 / 15666 / 16836 / 6044 / 908 / 212 / 1832 / 5024 / 5122 / 5319 / 4442 / 12514 / 627 / 2048 / 103114 / 20587 / 13273 / 153

Outcome results

Primary

Dose Escalation Cohort (Excluding Once Weekly Avelumab 10 mg/kg Cohort): Number of Participants Experiencing Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLTs)

DLT: defined using National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events Version 4.0, as any one of following: any Grade (Gr) \>=3toxicity that is possibly/probably/ definitely related to avelumab, except for any of following: Gr 3 infusion-related reaction resolving within 6 hours and controlled with medical management, Transient Gr 3 flu-like symptoms/fever, which is controlled with medical management, Transient Gr 3 fatigue, local reactions, headache, nausea, emesis that resolves to \<= Gr 1, Gr3 diarrhea, Gr 3 skin toxicity, Gr 3 liver function test increase that resolves to \<= Gr1 in \< 7 days after medical management has been initiated, Single laboratory values out of normal range that were unlikely related to study treatment according to investigator, did not have any clinical correlate, and resolved to \<= Gr1 within 7 days with adequate medical management and tumor flare phenomenon defined as local pain, irritation/rash localized at sites of known/suspected tumor.

Time frame: Dose Escalation: Baseline up to Week 3

Population: DLT analysis set included all participants with data used for implementing the dose-escalation schedule. These participants should have received all study drug administrations in the DLT evaluation period, or should have stopped treatment because of DLTs in the DLT evaluation period.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 1.0 mg/kgDose Escalation Cohort (Excluding Once Weekly Avelumab 10 mg/kg Cohort): Number of Participants Experiencing Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLTs)0 Participants
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 3.0 mg/kgDose Escalation Cohort (Excluding Once Weekly Avelumab 10 mg/kg Cohort): Number of Participants Experiencing Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLTs)0 Participants
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 10.0 mg/kgDose Escalation Cohort (Excluding Once Weekly Avelumab 10 mg/kg Cohort): Number of Participants Experiencing Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLTs)0 Participants
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 20.0 mg/kgDose Escalation Cohort (Excluding Once Weekly Avelumab 10 mg/kg Cohort): Number of Participants Experiencing Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLTs)1 Participants
Primary

Efficacy Expansion Cohort (GC/GEJC, Third Line): Number of Participants With Confirmed Best Overall Response (BOR) as Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1), as Adjudicated by Independent Endpoint Review Committee (IERC)

Confirmed BOR was determined according to RECIST 1.1 and as adjudicated by an Independent Endpoint Review Committee (IERC) and defined as best response of any of complete response (CR), partial response (PR), stable disease (SD) and progressive disease (PD) recorded from date of randomization until disease progression/recurrence (taking smallest measurement recorded since start of treatment as reference). CR: Disappearance of all evidence of target/non-target lesions. PR: At least 30% reduction from baseline in sum of longest diameter (SLD) of all lesions. SD: Neither sufficient increase to qualify for PD nor sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR. PD: at least a 20% increase in SLD, taking as reference smallest SLD recorded from baseline/appearance of 1 or more new lesions and unequivocal progression of non-target lesions.

Time frame: GC/GEJC, Third Line Efficacy Expansion: Baseline up to Day 871

Population: Full analysis set (FAS) included all participants who have received at least 1 dose of study treatment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 1.0 mg/kgEfficacy Expansion Cohort (GC/GEJC, Third Line): Number of Participants With Confirmed Best Overall Response (BOR) as Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1), as Adjudicated by Independent Endpoint Review Committee (IERC)Complete response (CR)2 Participants
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 1.0 mg/kgEfficacy Expansion Cohort (GC/GEJC, Third Line): Number of Participants With Confirmed Best Overall Response (BOR) as Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1), as Adjudicated by Independent Endpoint Review Committee (IERC)Partial response (PR)5 Participants
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 1.0 mg/kgEfficacy Expansion Cohort (GC/GEJC, Third Line): Number of Participants With Confirmed Best Overall Response (BOR) as Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1), as Adjudicated by Independent Endpoint Review Committee (IERC)Progressive disease (PD)72 Participants
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 1.0 mg/kgEfficacy Expansion Cohort (GC/GEJC, Third Line): Number of Participants With Confirmed Best Overall Response (BOR) as Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1), as Adjudicated by Independent Endpoint Review Committee (IERC)Non-CR/Non-PD5 Participants
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 1.0 mg/kgEfficacy Expansion Cohort (GC/GEJC, Third Line): Number of Participants With Confirmed Best Overall Response (BOR) as Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1), as Adjudicated by Independent Endpoint Review Committee (IERC)Non-evaluable24 Participants
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 1.0 mg/kgEfficacy Expansion Cohort (GC/GEJC, Third Line): Number of Participants With Confirmed Best Overall Response (BOR) as Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1), as Adjudicated by Independent Endpoint Review Committee (IERC)Stable disease (SD)24 Participants
Primary

Efficacy Expansion Cohort (HNSCC): Number of Participants With Confirmed Best Overall Response (BOR) as Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1), as Adjudicated by Independent Endpoint Review Committee (IERC)

Confirmed BOR was determined according to RECIST 1.1 and as adjudicated by an Independent Endpoint Review Committee (IERC) and defined as best response of any of complete response (CR), partial response (PR), stable disease (SD) and progressive disease (PD) recorded from date of randomization until disease progression/recurrence (taking smallest measurement recorded since start of treatment as reference). CR: Disappearance of all evidence of target/non-target lesions. PR: At least 30%reduction from baseline in sum of longest diameter (SLD) of all lesions. SD: Neither sufficient increase to qualify for PD nor sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR. PD: at least a 20% increase in SLD, taking as reference smallest SLD recorded from baseline/appearance of 1or more new lesions and unequivocal progression of non-target lesions.

Time frame: HNSCC Efficacy Expansion: Baseline up to Day 1072

Population: Full analysis set (FAS) included all participants who have received at least 1 dose of study treatment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 1.0 mg/kgEfficacy Expansion Cohort (HNSCC): Number of Participants With Confirmed Best Overall Response (BOR) as Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1), as Adjudicated by Independent Endpoint Review Committee (IERC)Complete response (CR)2 Participants
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 1.0 mg/kgEfficacy Expansion Cohort (HNSCC): Number of Participants With Confirmed Best Overall Response (BOR) as Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1), as Adjudicated by Independent Endpoint Review Committee (IERC)Partial response (PR)12 Participants
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 1.0 mg/kgEfficacy Expansion Cohort (HNSCC): Number of Participants With Confirmed Best Overall Response (BOR) as Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1), as Adjudicated by Independent Endpoint Review Committee (IERC)Stable disease (SD)46 Participants
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 1.0 mg/kgEfficacy Expansion Cohort (HNSCC): Number of Participants With Confirmed Best Overall Response (BOR) as Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1), as Adjudicated by Independent Endpoint Review Committee (IERC)Progressive disease (PD)67 Participants
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 1.0 mg/kgEfficacy Expansion Cohort (HNSCC): Number of Participants With Confirmed Best Overall Response (BOR) as Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1), as Adjudicated by Independent Endpoint Review Committee (IERC)Non-evaluable25 Participants
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 1.0 mg/kgEfficacy Expansion Cohort (HNSCC): Number of Participants With Confirmed Best Overall Response (BOR) as Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1), as Adjudicated by Independent Endpoint Review Committee (IERC)Non-CR/Non-PD1 Participants
Primary

Efficacy Expansion Cohort (Ovarian Cancer): Number of Participants With Confirmed Best Overall Response (BOR) as Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1), as Adjudicated by Independent Endpoint Review Committee (IERC)

Confirmed BOR was determined according to RECIST 1.1 and as adjudicated by an Independent Endpoint Review Committee (IERC) and defined as best response of any of complete response (CR), partial response (PR), stable disease (SD) and progressive disease (PD) recorded from date of randomization until disease progression/recurrence (taking smallest measurement recorded since start of treatment as reference). CR: Disappearance of all evidence of target/non-target lesions. PR: At least 30%reduction from baseline in sum of longest diameter (SLD) of all lesions. SD: Neither sufficient increase to qualify for PD nor sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR. PD: at least a 20% increase in SLD, taking as reference smallest SLD recorded from baseline/appearance of 1or more new lesions and unequivocal progression of non-target lesions.

Time frame: Ovarian Cancer Efficacy Expansion: Baseline up to Day 620

Population: Full analysis set (FAS) included all participants who have received at least 1 dose of study treatment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 1.0 mg/kgEfficacy Expansion Cohort (Ovarian Cancer): Number of Participants With Confirmed Best Overall Response (BOR) as Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1), as Adjudicated by Independent Endpoint Review Committee (IERC)Complete response (CR)3 Participants
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 1.0 mg/kgEfficacy Expansion Cohort (Ovarian Cancer): Number of Participants With Confirmed Best Overall Response (BOR) as Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1), as Adjudicated by Independent Endpoint Review Committee (IERC)Partial response (PR)1 Participants
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 1.0 mg/kgEfficacy Expansion Cohort (Ovarian Cancer): Number of Participants With Confirmed Best Overall Response (BOR) as Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1), as Adjudicated by Independent Endpoint Review Committee (IERC)Non-CR/Non-PD3 Participants
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 1.0 mg/kgEfficacy Expansion Cohort (Ovarian Cancer): Number of Participants With Confirmed Best Overall Response (BOR) as Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1), as Adjudicated by Independent Endpoint Review Committee (IERC)Stable disease (SD)41 Participants
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 1.0 mg/kgEfficacy Expansion Cohort (Ovarian Cancer): Number of Participants With Confirmed Best Overall Response (BOR) as Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1), as Adjudicated by Independent Endpoint Review Committee (IERC)Progressive disease (PD)39 Participants
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 1.0 mg/kgEfficacy Expansion Cohort (Ovarian Cancer): Number of Participants With Confirmed Best Overall Response (BOR) as Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1), as Adjudicated by Independent Endpoint Review Committee (IERC)Non-evaluable16 Participants
Primary

Efficacy Expansion Cohort(Urothelial Carcinoma): Number of Participants With Confirmed Best Overall Response (BOR) as Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1), as Adjudicated by Independent Endpoint Review Committee (IERC)

Confirmed BOR was determined according to RECIST 1.1 and as adjudicated by an Independent Endpoint Review Committee (IERC) and defined as best response of any of complete response (CR), partial response (PR), stable disease (SD) and progressive disease (PD) recorded from date of randomization until disease progression/recurrence (taking smallest measurement recorded since start of treatment as reference). CR: Disappearance of all evidence of target/non-target lesions. PR: At least 30% reduction from baseline in sum of longest diameter (SLD) of all lesions. SD: Neither sufficient increase to qualify for PD nor sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR. PD: at least a 20% increase in SLD, taking as reference smallest SLD recorded from baseline/appearance of 1 or more new lesions and unequivocal progression of non-target lesions.

Time frame: Urothelial Carcinoma Efficacy Expansion: Baseline up to Day 931

Population: Full analysis set (FAS) included all participants who have received at least 1 dose of study treatment. Here, Overall Number of Participants Analyzed signifies those participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 1.0 mg/kgEfficacy Expansion Cohort(Urothelial Carcinoma): Number of Participants With Confirmed Best Overall Response (BOR) as Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1), as Adjudicated by Independent Endpoint Review Committee (IERC)Partial response (PR)26 Participants
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 1.0 mg/kgEfficacy Expansion Cohort(Urothelial Carcinoma): Number of Participants With Confirmed Best Overall Response (BOR) as Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1), as Adjudicated by Independent Endpoint Review Committee (IERC)Stable disease (SD)51 Participants
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 1.0 mg/kgEfficacy Expansion Cohort(Urothelial Carcinoma): Number of Participants With Confirmed Best Overall Response (BOR) as Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1), as Adjudicated by Independent Endpoint Review Committee (IERC)Progressive disease (PD)77 Participants
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 1.0 mg/kgEfficacy Expansion Cohort(Urothelial Carcinoma): Number of Participants With Confirmed Best Overall Response (BOR) as Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1), as Adjudicated by Independent Endpoint Review Committee (IERC)Non-evaluable37 Participants
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 1.0 mg/kgEfficacy Expansion Cohort(Urothelial Carcinoma): Number of Participants With Confirmed Best Overall Response (BOR) as Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1), as Adjudicated by Independent Endpoint Review Committee (IERC)Complete response (CR)6 Participants
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 1.0 mg/kgEfficacy Expansion Cohort(Urothelial Carcinoma): Number of Participants With Confirmed Best Overall Response (BOR) as Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1), as Adjudicated by Independent Endpoint Review Committee (IERC)Non-CR/Non-PD1 Participants
Secondary

Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per Severity

Adverse event(AE): any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with use of study drug, whether or not related to study drug. A serious adverse event(SAE) was an AE that resulted in any of following outcomes: death; life threatening; persistent/significant disability/incapacity; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; congenital anomaly/birth defect or was otherwise considered medically important. Treatment-emergent events were events between first dose of study drug that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pre-treatment state up to 30 days after last administration.TEAEs included both Serious TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs. Severity of TEAEs were graded using National Cancer Institute-Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) version 4.0 toxicity grades, as follows: Grade 1= Mild, Grade 2= Moderate, Grade 3= Severe, Grade 4= Life-threatening and Grade 5= Death.

Time frame: Up to Day 2511

Population: Safety analysis set (SAF) included all participants who have received at least 1 dose of study treatment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 1.0 mg/kgDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with TEAEs with missing Grade0 Participants
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 1.0 mg/kgDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with TEAEs with Grade 1 severity0 Participants
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 1.0 mg/kgDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with TEAEs4 Participants
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 1.0 mg/kgDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with TEAEs with Grade 4 severity0 Participants
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 1.0 mg/kgDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with TEAEs with Grade 5 severity2 Participants
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 1.0 mg/kgDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with TEAEs with Grade 3 severity2 Participants
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 1.0 mg/kgDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with TEAEs with Grade 2 severity0 Participants
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 3.0 mg/kgDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with TEAEs with Grade 2 severity4 Participants
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 3.0 mg/kgDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with TEAEs13 Participants
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 3.0 mg/kgDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with TEAEs with Grade 1 severity1 Participants
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 3.0 mg/kgDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with TEAEs with Grade 3 severity4 Participants
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 3.0 mg/kgDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with TEAEs with Grade 5 severity4 Participants
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 3.0 mg/kgDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with TEAEs with missing Grade0 Participants
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 3.0 mg/kgDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with TEAEs with Grade 4 severity0 Participants
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 10.0 mg/kgDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with TEAEs with Grade 4 severity2 Participants
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 10.0 mg/kgDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with TEAEs15 Participants
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 10.0 mg/kgDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with TEAEs with Grade 3 severity6 Participants
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 10.0 mg/kgDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with TEAEs with Grade 1 severity1 Participants
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 10.0 mg/kgDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with TEAEs with missing Grade0 Participants
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 10.0 mg/kgDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with TEAEs with Grade 2 severity4 Participants
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 10.0 mg/kgDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with TEAEs with Grade 5 severity2 Participants
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 20.0 mg/kgDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with TEAEs with Grade 5 severity1 Participants
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 20.0 mg/kgDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with TEAEs with Grade 1 severity2 Participants
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 20.0 mg/kgDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with TEAEs21 Participants
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 20.0 mg/kgDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with TEAEs with Grade 2 severity6 Participants
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 20.0 mg/kgDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with TEAEs with missing Grade0 Participants
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 20.0 mg/kgDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with TEAEs with Grade 4 severity1 Participants
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 20.0 mg/kgDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with TEAEs with Grade 3 severity11 Participants
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 10.0 mg/kg WeeklyDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with TEAEs with missing Grade0 Participants
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 10.0 mg/kg WeeklyDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with TEAEs with Grade 1 severity2 Participants
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 10.0 mg/kg WeeklyDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with TEAEs8 Participants
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 10.0 mg/kg WeeklyDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with TEAEs with Grade 3 severity3 Participants
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 10.0 mg/kg WeeklyDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with TEAEs with Grade 2 severity3 Participants
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 10.0 mg/kg WeeklyDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with TEAEs with Grade 5 severity0 Participants
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 10.0 mg/kg WeeklyDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with TEAEs with Grade 4 severity0 Participants
Primary Expansion Cohort: NSCLC, Post-platinum DoubletDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with TEAEs182 Participants
Primary Expansion Cohort: NSCLC, Post-platinum DoubletDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with TEAEs with Grade 1 severity11 Participants
Primary Expansion Cohort: NSCLC, Post-platinum DoubletDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with TEAEs with Grade 2 severity54 Participants
Primary Expansion Cohort: NSCLC, Post-platinum DoubletDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with TEAEs with Grade 4 severity19 Participants
Primary Expansion Cohort: NSCLC, Post-platinum DoubletDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with TEAEs with missing Grade0 Participants
Primary Expansion Cohort: NSCLC, Post-platinum DoubletDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with TEAEs with Grade 5 severity32 Participants
Primary Expansion Cohort: NSCLC, Post-platinum DoubletDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with TEAEs with Grade 3 severity66 Participants
Primary Expansion Cohort: NSCLC, First LineDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with TEAEs with Grade 3 severity68 Participants
Primary Expansion Cohort: NSCLC, First LineDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with TEAEs with Grade 5 severity25 Participants
Primary Expansion Cohort: NSCLC, First LineDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with TEAEs with Grade 2 severity45 Participants
Primary Expansion Cohort: NSCLC, First LineDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with TEAEs with Grade 1 severity3 Participants
Primary Expansion Cohort: NSCLC, First LineDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with TEAEs with Grade 4 severity15 Participants
Primary Expansion Cohort: NSCLC, First LineDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with TEAEs with missing Grade0 Participants
Primary Expansion Cohort: NSCLC, First LineDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with TEAEs156 Participants
Primary Expansion Cohort: Metastatic Breast CancerDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with TEAEs with missing Grade0 Participants
Primary Expansion Cohort: Metastatic Breast CancerDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with TEAEs with Grade 1 severity22 Participants
Primary Expansion Cohort: Metastatic Breast CancerDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with TEAEs with Grade 2 severity58 Participants
Primary Expansion Cohort: Metastatic Breast CancerDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with TEAEs with Grade 4 severity12 Participants
Primary Expansion Cohort: Metastatic Breast CancerDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with TEAEs with Grade 5 severity24 Participants
Primary Expansion Cohort: Metastatic Breast CancerDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with TEAEs with Grade 3 severity45 Participants
Primary Expansion Cohort: Metastatic Breast CancerDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with TEAEs161 Participants
Primary Expansion Cohort: GC/GEJC ProgressedDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with TEAEs with missing Grade0 Participants
Primary Expansion Cohort: GC/GEJC ProgressedDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with TEAEs60 Participants
Primary Expansion Cohort: GC/GEJC ProgressedDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with TEAEs with Grade 3 severity29 Participants
Primary Expansion Cohort: GC/GEJC ProgressedDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with TEAEs with Grade 2 severity9 Participants
Primary Expansion Cohort: GC/GEJC ProgressedDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with TEAEs with Grade 5 severity10 Participants
Primary Expansion Cohort: GC/GEJC ProgressedDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with TEAEs with Grade 1 severity5 Participants
Primary Expansion Cohort: GC/GEJC ProgressedDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with TEAEs with Grade 4 severity7 Participants
Primary Expansion Cohort: GC/GEJC Non ProgressedDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with TEAEs with Grade 4 severity4 Participants
Primary Expansion Cohort: GC/GEJC Non ProgressedDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with TEAEs with Grade 2 severity19 Participants
Primary Expansion Cohort: GC/GEJC Non ProgressedDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with TEAEs with Grade 5 severity10 Participants
Primary Expansion Cohort: GC/GEJC Non ProgressedDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with TEAEs with Grade 1 severity14 Participants
Primary Expansion Cohort: GC/GEJC Non ProgressedDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with TEAEs with missing Grade0 Participants
Primary Expansion Cohort: GC/GEJC Non ProgressedDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with TEAEs88 Participants
Primary Expansion Cohort: GC/GEJC Non ProgressedDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with TEAEs with Grade 3 severity41 Participants
Secondary Expansion Cohort: Colorectal CancerDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with TEAEs with Grade 2 severity9 Participants
Secondary Expansion Cohort: Colorectal CancerDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with TEAEs21 Participants
Secondary Expansion Cohort: Colorectal CancerDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with TEAEs with Grade 5 severity3 Participants
Secondary Expansion Cohort: Colorectal CancerDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with TEAEs with Grade 4 severity1 Participants
Secondary Expansion Cohort: Colorectal CancerDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with TEAEs with Grade 1 severity2 Participants
Secondary Expansion Cohort: Colorectal CancerDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with TEAEs with missing Grade0 Participants
Secondary Expansion Cohort: Colorectal CancerDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with TEAEs with Grade 3 severity6 Participants
Secondary Expansion Cohort: Castrate-resistant Prostate CancerDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with TEAEs with Grade 2 severity5 Participants
Secondary Expansion Cohort: Castrate-resistant Prostate CancerDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with TEAEs with missing Grade0 Participants
Secondary Expansion Cohort: Castrate-resistant Prostate CancerDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with TEAEs17 Participants
Secondary Expansion Cohort: Castrate-resistant Prostate CancerDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with TEAEs with Grade 4 severity0 Participants
Secondary Expansion Cohort: Castrate-resistant Prostate CancerDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with TEAEs with Grade 3 severity7 Participants
Secondary Expansion Cohort: Castrate-resistant Prostate CancerDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with TEAEs with Grade 1 severity5 Participants
Secondary Expansion Cohort: Castrate-resistant Prostate CancerDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with TEAEs with Grade 5 severity0 Participants
Secondary Expansion Cohort: Adrenocortical CarcinomaDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with TEAEs with Grade 3 severity25 Participants
Secondary Expansion Cohort: Adrenocortical CarcinomaDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with TEAEs with missing Grade0 Participants
Secondary Expansion Cohort: Adrenocortical CarcinomaDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with TEAEs with Grade 2 severity10 Participants
Secondary Expansion Cohort: Adrenocortical CarcinomaDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with TEAEs50 Participants
Secondary Expansion Cohort: Adrenocortical CarcinomaDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with TEAEs with Grade 4 severity8 Participants
Secondary Expansion Cohort: Adrenocortical CarcinomaDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with TEAEs with Grade 5 severity6 Participants
Secondary Expansion Cohort: Adrenocortical CarcinomaDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with TEAEs with Grade 1 severity1 Participants
Secondary Expansion Cohort: MelanomaDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with TEAEs with missing Grade0 Participants
Secondary Expansion Cohort: MelanomaDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with TEAEs with Grade 1 severity2 Participants
Secondary Expansion Cohort: MelanomaDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with TEAEs with Grade 2 severity17 Participants
Secondary Expansion Cohort: MelanomaDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with TEAEs with Grade 3 severity21 Participants
Secondary Expansion Cohort: MelanomaDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with TEAEs with Grade 5 severity5 Participants
Secondary Expansion Cohort: MelanomaDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with TEAEs50 Participants
Secondary Expansion Cohort: MelanomaDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with TEAEs with Grade 4 severity5 Participants
Secondary Expansion Cohort: MesotheliomaDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with TEAEs53 Participants
Secondary Expansion Cohort: MesotheliomaDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with TEAEs with missing Grade0 Participants
Secondary Expansion Cohort: MesotheliomaDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with TEAEs with Grade 5 severity4 Participants
Secondary Expansion Cohort: MesotheliomaDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with TEAEs with Grade 4 severity3 Participants
Secondary Expansion Cohort: MesotheliomaDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with TEAEs with Grade 1 severity2 Participants
Secondary Expansion Cohort: MesotheliomaDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with TEAEs with Grade 3 severity23 Participants
Secondary Expansion Cohort: MesotheliomaDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with TEAEs with Grade 2 severity21 Participants
Secondary Expansion Cohort: Urothelial CarcinomaDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with TEAEs with Grade 5 severity7 Participants
Secondary Expansion Cohort: Urothelial CarcinomaDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with TEAEs with Grade 3 severity18 Participants
Secondary Expansion Cohort: Urothelial CarcinomaDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with TEAEs with Grade 4 severity6 Participants
Secondary Expansion Cohort: Urothelial CarcinomaDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with TEAEs with missing Grade0 Participants
Secondary Expansion Cohort: Urothelial CarcinomaDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with TEAEs with Grade 2 severity10 Participants
Secondary Expansion Cohort: Urothelial CarcinomaDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with TEAEs with Grade 1 severity3 Participants
Secondary Expansion Cohort: Urothelial CarcinomaDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with TEAEs44 Participants
Secondary Expansion Cohort: Ovarian CancerDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with TEAEs122 Participants
Secondary Expansion Cohort: Ovarian CancerDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with TEAEs with Grade 3 severity42 Participants
Secondary Expansion Cohort: Ovarian CancerDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with TEAEs with Grade 4 severity3 Participants
Secondary Expansion Cohort: Ovarian CancerDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with TEAEs with missing Grade0 Participants
Secondary Expansion Cohort: Ovarian CancerDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with TEAEs with Grade 2 severity52 Participants
Secondary Expansion Cohort: Ovarian CancerDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with TEAEs with Grade 1 severity11 Participants
Secondary Expansion Cohort: Ovarian CancerDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with TEAEs with Grade 5 severity14 Participants
Secondary Expansion Cohort: Renal Cell Carcinoma (First Line)Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with TEAEs with Grade 1 severity7 Participants
Secondary Expansion Cohort: Renal Cell Carcinoma (First Line)Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with TEAEs with Grade 2 severity25 Participants
Secondary Expansion Cohort: Renal Cell Carcinoma (First Line)Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with TEAEs with Grade 5 severity4 Participants
Secondary Expansion Cohort: Renal Cell Carcinoma (First Line)Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with TEAEs with missing Grade0 Participants
Secondary Expansion Cohort: Renal Cell Carcinoma (First Line)Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with TEAEs with Grade 4 severity6 Participants
Secondary Expansion Cohort: Renal Cell Carcinoma (First Line)Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with TEAEs62 Participants
Secondary Expansion Cohort: Renal Cell Carcinoma (First Line)Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with TEAEs with Grade 3 severity20 Participants
Secondary Expansion Cohort: Renal Cell Carcinoma (Second Line)Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with TEAEs with Grade 1 severity1 Participants
Secondary Expansion Cohort: Renal Cell Carcinoma (Second Line)Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with TEAEs with Grade 5 severity2 Participants
Secondary Expansion Cohort: Renal Cell Carcinoma (Second Line)Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with TEAEs with Grade 4 severity1 Participants
Secondary Expansion Cohort: Renal Cell Carcinoma (Second Line)Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with TEAEs with Grade 3 severity10 Participants
Secondary Expansion Cohort: Renal Cell Carcinoma (Second Line)Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with TEAEs with Grade 2 severity5 Participants
Secondary Expansion Cohort: Renal Cell Carcinoma (Second Line)Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with TEAEs19 Participants
Secondary Expansion Cohort: Renal Cell Carcinoma (Second Line)Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with TEAEs with missing Grade0 Participants
Efficacy Expansion Cohort: Ovarian CancerDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with TEAEs with Grade 4 severity6 Participants
Efficacy Expansion Cohort: Ovarian CancerDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with TEAEs with Grade 3 severity45 Participants
Efficacy Expansion Cohort: Ovarian CancerDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with TEAEs with Grade 1 severity7 Participants
Efficacy Expansion Cohort: Ovarian CancerDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with TEAEs with missing Grade0 Participants
Efficacy Expansion Cohort: Ovarian CancerDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with TEAEs with Grade 2 severity30 Participants
Efficacy Expansion Cohort: Ovarian CancerDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with TEAEs103 Participants
Efficacy Expansion Cohort: Ovarian CancerDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with TEAEs with Grade 5 severity15 Participants
Efficacy Expansion Cohort: Urothelial CarcinomaDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with TEAEs with Grade 4 severity16 Participants
Efficacy Expansion Cohort: Urothelial CarcinomaDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with TEAEs with Grade 3 severity82 Participants
Efficacy Expansion Cohort: Urothelial CarcinomaDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with TEAEs with Grade 5 severity45 Participants
Efficacy Expansion Cohort: Urothelial CarcinomaDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with TEAEs with Grade 2 severity46 Participants
Efficacy Expansion Cohort: Urothelial CarcinomaDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with TEAEs204 Participants
Efficacy Expansion Cohort: Urothelial CarcinomaDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with TEAEs with Grade 1 severity15 Participants
Efficacy Expansion Cohort: Urothelial CarcinomaDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with TEAEs with missing Grade0 Participants
Efficacy Expansion Cohort: GC/GEJC, Third LineDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with TEAEs with Grade 3 severity51 Participants
Efficacy Expansion Cohort: GC/GEJC, Third LineDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with TEAEs with Grade 2 severity30 Participants
Efficacy Expansion Cohort: GC/GEJC, Third LineDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with TEAEs130 Participants
Efficacy Expansion Cohort: GC/GEJC, Third LineDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with TEAEs with Grade 4 severity12 Participants
Efficacy Expansion Cohort: GC/GEJC, Third LineDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with TEAEs with missing Grade0 Participants
Efficacy Expansion Cohort: GC/GEJC, Third LineDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with TEAEs with Grade 1 severity2 Participants
Efficacy Expansion Cohort: GC/GEJC, Third LineDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with TEAEs with Grade 5 severity35 Participants
Efficacy Expansion Cohort: HNSCCDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with TEAEs with Grade 4 severity12 Participants
Efficacy Expansion Cohort: HNSCCDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with TEAEs with missing Grade1 Participants
Efficacy Expansion Cohort: HNSCCDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with TEAEs with Grade 3 severity54 Participants
Efficacy Expansion Cohort: HNSCCDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with TEAEs with Grade 5 severity25 Participants
Efficacy Expansion Cohort: HNSCCDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with TEAEs with Grade 1 severity14 Participants
Efficacy Expansion Cohort: HNSCCDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with TEAEs149 Participants
Efficacy Expansion Cohort: HNSCCDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with TEAEs with Grade 2 severity43 Participants
Secondary

Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per Severity

AE was defined as any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of study drug, whether or not related to study drug. Treatment-emergent events were the events between first dose of study drug that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pre-treatment state up to 30 days after last administration. TEAEs included both Serious TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs. Treatment related AE was defined as having a Possible or Related relationship to study treatment, as assessed by the Investigator. Severity of Treatment-Related TEAEs were graded using NCI-CTCAE version 4.0 toxicity grades, as follows: Grade 1= Mild, Grade 2= Moderate, Grade 3= Severe, Grade 4= Life-threatening and Grade 5= Death.

Time frame: Baseline up to Day 2511

Population: SAF included all participants who have received at least 1 dose of study treatment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 1.0 mg/kgDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with Grade 5 severity0 Participants
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 1.0 mg/kgDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with Grade 4 severity0 Participants
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 1.0 mg/kgDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with Grade 2 severity1 Participants
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 1.0 mg/kgDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with Grade 1 severity1 Participants
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 1.0 mg/kgDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with Treatment-Related TEAEs3 Participants
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 1.0 mg/kgDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with Grade 3 severity1 Participants
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 1.0 mg/kgDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with missing Grade0 Participants
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 3.0 mg/kgDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with Grade 4 severity0 Participants
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 3.0 mg/kgDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with Grade 1 severity5 Participants
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 3.0 mg/kgDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with Grade 5 severity0 Participants
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 3.0 mg/kgDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with Grade 2 severity4 Participants
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 3.0 mg/kgDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with Grade 3 severity0 Participants
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 3.0 mg/kgDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with missing Grade0 Participants
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 3.0 mg/kgDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with Treatment-Related TEAEs9 Participants
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 10.0 mg/kgDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with missing Grade0 Participants
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 10.0 mg/kgDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with Grade 4 severity1 Participants
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 10.0 mg/kgDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with Grade 5 severity0 Participants
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 10.0 mg/kgDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with Grade 2 severity3 Participants
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 10.0 mg/kgDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with Grade 1 severity7 Participants
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 10.0 mg/kgDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with Grade 3 severity3 Participants
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 10.0 mg/kgDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with Treatment-Related TEAEs14 Participants
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 20.0 mg/kgDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with Grade 4 severity1 Participants
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 20.0 mg/kgDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with Grade 1 severity6 Participants
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 20.0 mg/kgDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with missing Grade0 Participants
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 20.0 mg/kgDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with Grade 2 severity8 Participants
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 20.0 mg/kgDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with Grade 5 severity0 Participants
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 20.0 mg/kgDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with Treatment-Related TEAEs17 Participants
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 20.0 mg/kgDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with Grade 3 severity2 Participants
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 10.0 mg/kg WeeklyDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with Grade 5 severity0 Participants
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 10.0 mg/kg WeeklyDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with Grade 2 severity4 Participants
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 10.0 mg/kg WeeklyDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with Grade 4 severity0 Participants
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 10.0 mg/kg WeeklyDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with Grade 3 severity1 Participants
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 10.0 mg/kg WeeklyDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with Treatment-Related TEAEs7 Participants
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 10.0 mg/kg WeeklyDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with missing Grade0 Participants
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 10.0 mg/kg WeeklyDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with Grade 1 severity2 Participants
Primary Expansion Cohort: NSCLC, Post-platinum DoubletDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with Treatment-Related TEAEs146 Participants
Primary Expansion Cohort: NSCLC, Post-platinum DoubletDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with Grade 2 severity71 Participants
Primary Expansion Cohort: NSCLC, Post-platinum DoubletDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with missing Grade0 Participants
Primary Expansion Cohort: NSCLC, Post-platinum DoubletDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with Grade 3 severity21 Participants
Primary Expansion Cohort: NSCLC, Post-platinum DoubletDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with Grade 1 severity46 Participants
Primary Expansion Cohort: NSCLC, Post-platinum DoubletDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with Grade 5 severity0 Participants
Primary Expansion Cohort: NSCLC, Post-platinum DoubletDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with Grade 4 severity8 Participants
Primary Expansion Cohort: NSCLC, First LineDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with Grade 4 severity3 Participants
Primary Expansion Cohort: NSCLC, First LineDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with Grade 3 severity17 Participants
Primary Expansion Cohort: NSCLC, First LineDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with Grade 2 severity60 Participants
Primary Expansion Cohort: NSCLC, First LineDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with Grade 5 severity0 Participants
Primary Expansion Cohort: NSCLC, First LineDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with Grade 1 severity29 Participants
Primary Expansion Cohort: NSCLC, First LineDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with Treatment-Related TEAEs109 Participants
Primary Expansion Cohort: NSCLC, First LineDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with missing Grade0 Participants
Primary Expansion Cohort: Metastatic Breast CancerDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with missing Grade0 Participants
Primary Expansion Cohort: Metastatic Breast CancerDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with Grade 4 severity5 Participants
Primary Expansion Cohort: Metastatic Breast CancerDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with Treatment-Related TEAEs118 Participants
Primary Expansion Cohort: Metastatic Breast CancerDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with Grade 5 severity2 Participants
Primary Expansion Cohort: Metastatic Breast CancerDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with Grade 3 severity13 Participants
Primary Expansion Cohort: Metastatic Breast CancerDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with Grade 2 severity46 Participants
Primary Expansion Cohort: Metastatic Breast CancerDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with Grade 1 severity52 Participants
Primary Expansion Cohort: GC/GEJC ProgressedDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with Grade 3 severity4 Participants
Primary Expansion Cohort: GC/GEJC ProgressedDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with Grade 2 severity9 Participants
Primary Expansion Cohort: GC/GEJC ProgressedDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with Grade 5 severity0 Participants
Primary Expansion Cohort: GC/GEJC ProgressedDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with Grade 4 severity1 Participants
Primary Expansion Cohort: GC/GEJC ProgressedDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with Grade 1 severity14 Participants
Primary Expansion Cohort: GC/GEJC ProgressedDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with missing Grade0 Participants
Primary Expansion Cohort: GC/GEJC ProgressedDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with Treatment-Related TEAEs28 Participants
Primary Expansion Cohort: GC/GEJC Non ProgressedDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with Grade 4 severity0 Participants
Primary Expansion Cohort: GC/GEJC Non ProgressedDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with Grade 1 severity27 Participants
Primary Expansion Cohort: GC/GEJC Non ProgressedDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with missing Grade0 Participants
Primary Expansion Cohort: GC/GEJC Non ProgressedDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with Grade 2 severity22 Participants
Primary Expansion Cohort: GC/GEJC Non ProgressedDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with Grade 3 severity7 Participants
Primary Expansion Cohort: GC/GEJC Non ProgressedDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with Treatment-Related TEAEs57 Participants
Primary Expansion Cohort: GC/GEJC Non ProgressedDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with Grade 5 severity1 Participants
Secondary Expansion Cohort: Colorectal CancerDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with Grade 5 severity0 Participants
Secondary Expansion Cohort: Colorectal CancerDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with Grade 3 severity3 Participants
Secondary Expansion Cohort: Colorectal CancerDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with Grade 4 severity0 Participants
Secondary Expansion Cohort: Colorectal CancerDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with Grade 2 severity9 Participants
Secondary Expansion Cohort: Colorectal CancerDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with Treatment-Related TEAEs16 Participants
Secondary Expansion Cohort: Colorectal CancerDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with missing Grade0 Participants
Secondary Expansion Cohort: Colorectal CancerDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with Grade 1 severity4 Participants
Secondary Expansion Cohort: Castrate-resistant Prostate CancerDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with Grade 4 severity0 Participants
Secondary Expansion Cohort: Castrate-resistant Prostate CancerDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with Grade 1 severity8 Participants
Secondary Expansion Cohort: Castrate-resistant Prostate CancerDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with Treatment-Related TEAEs15 Participants
Secondary Expansion Cohort: Castrate-resistant Prostate CancerDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with Grade 2 severity6 Participants
Secondary Expansion Cohort: Castrate-resistant Prostate CancerDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with Grade 3 severity1 Participants
Secondary Expansion Cohort: Castrate-resistant Prostate CancerDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with Grade 5 severity0 Participants
Secondary Expansion Cohort: Castrate-resistant Prostate CancerDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with missing Grade0 Participants
Secondary Expansion Cohort: Adrenocortical CarcinomaDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with Grade 4 severity0 Participants
Secondary Expansion Cohort: Adrenocortical CarcinomaDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with Grade 3 severity8 Participants
Secondary Expansion Cohort: Adrenocortical CarcinomaDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with Grade 5 severity0 Participants
Secondary Expansion Cohort: Adrenocortical CarcinomaDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with Grade 1 severity12 Participants
Secondary Expansion Cohort: Adrenocortical CarcinomaDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with Treatment-Related TEAEs41 Participants
Secondary Expansion Cohort: Adrenocortical CarcinomaDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with Grade 2 severity21 Participants
Secondary Expansion Cohort: Adrenocortical CarcinomaDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with missing Grade0 Participants
Secondary Expansion Cohort: MelanomaDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with Grade 3 severity4 Participants
Secondary Expansion Cohort: MelanomaDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with Grade 2 severity20 Participants
Secondary Expansion Cohort: MelanomaDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with Grade 5 severity0 Participants
Secondary Expansion Cohort: MelanomaDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with Grade 1 severity15 Participants
Secondary Expansion Cohort: MelanomaDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with missing Grade0 Participants
Secondary Expansion Cohort: MelanomaDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with Grade 4 severity0 Participants
Secondary Expansion Cohort: MelanomaDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with Treatment-Related TEAEs39 Participants
Secondary Expansion Cohort: MesotheliomaDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with Grade 1 severity8 Participants
Secondary Expansion Cohort: MesotheliomaDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with Grade 4 severity2 Participants
Secondary Expansion Cohort: MesotheliomaDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with Grade 2 severity30 Participants
Secondary Expansion Cohort: MesotheliomaDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with Grade 5 severity0 Participants
Secondary Expansion Cohort: MesotheliomaDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with missing Grade0 Participants
Secondary Expansion Cohort: MesotheliomaDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with Treatment-Related TEAEs43 Participants
Secondary Expansion Cohort: MesotheliomaDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with Grade 3 severity3 Participants
Secondary Expansion Cohort: Urothelial CarcinomaDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with Grade 5 severity0 Participants
Secondary Expansion Cohort: Urothelial CarcinomaDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with Grade 1 severity11 Participants
Secondary Expansion Cohort: Urothelial CarcinomaDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with Grade 2 severity18 Participants
Secondary Expansion Cohort: Urothelial CarcinomaDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with missing Grade0 Participants
Secondary Expansion Cohort: Urothelial CarcinomaDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with Grade 3 severity2 Participants
Secondary Expansion Cohort: Urothelial CarcinomaDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with Treatment-Related TEAEs32 Participants
Secondary Expansion Cohort: Urothelial CarcinomaDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with Grade 4 severity1 Participants
Secondary Expansion Cohort: Ovarian CancerDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with missing Grade0 Participants
Secondary Expansion Cohort: Ovarian CancerDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with Grade 1 severity46 Participants
Secondary Expansion Cohort: Ovarian CancerDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with Grade 4 severity2 Participants
Secondary Expansion Cohort: Ovarian CancerDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with Grade 2 severity31 Participants
Secondary Expansion Cohort: Ovarian CancerDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with Grade 5 severity0 Participants
Secondary Expansion Cohort: Ovarian CancerDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with Treatment-Related TEAEs86 Participants
Secondary Expansion Cohort: Ovarian CancerDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with Grade 3 severity7 Participants
Secondary Expansion Cohort: Renal Cell Carcinoma (First Line)Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with Grade 2 severity23 Participants
Secondary Expansion Cohort: Renal Cell Carcinoma (First Line)Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with Grade 3 severity3 Participants
Secondary Expansion Cohort: Renal Cell Carcinoma (First Line)Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with missing Grade0 Participants
Secondary Expansion Cohort: Renal Cell Carcinoma (First Line)Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with Grade 4 severity5 Participants
Secondary Expansion Cohort: Renal Cell Carcinoma (First Line)Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with Grade 1 severity20 Participants
Secondary Expansion Cohort: Renal Cell Carcinoma (First Line)Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with Treatment-Related TEAEs51 Participants
Secondary Expansion Cohort: Renal Cell Carcinoma (First Line)Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with Grade 5 severity0 Participants
Secondary Expansion Cohort: Renal Cell Carcinoma (Second Line)Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with Grade 2 severity9 Participants
Secondary Expansion Cohort: Renal Cell Carcinoma (Second Line)Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with Grade 3 severity1 Participants
Secondary Expansion Cohort: Renal Cell Carcinoma (Second Line)Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with Grade 4 severity0 Participants
Secondary Expansion Cohort: Renal Cell Carcinoma (Second Line)Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with Grade 1 severity4 Participants
Secondary Expansion Cohort: Renal Cell Carcinoma (Second Line)Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with Grade 5 severity0 Participants
Secondary Expansion Cohort: Renal Cell Carcinoma (Second Line)Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with Treatment-Related TEAEs14 Participants
Secondary Expansion Cohort: Renal Cell Carcinoma (Second Line)Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with missing Grade0 Participants
Efficacy Expansion Cohort: Ovarian CancerDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with Treatment-Related TEAEs65 Participants
Efficacy Expansion Cohort: Ovarian CancerDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with Grade 5 severity0 Participants
Efficacy Expansion Cohort: Ovarian CancerDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with Grade 4 severity1 Participants
Efficacy Expansion Cohort: Ovarian CancerDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with Grade 2 severity26 Participants
Efficacy Expansion Cohort: Ovarian CancerDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with Grade 1 severity30 Participants
Efficacy Expansion Cohort: Ovarian CancerDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with Grade 3 severity8 Participants
Efficacy Expansion Cohort: Ovarian CancerDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with missing Grade0 Participants
Efficacy Expansion Cohort: Urothelial CarcinomaDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with Grade 1 severity50 Participants
Efficacy Expansion Cohort: Urothelial CarcinomaDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with Grade 4 severity3 Participants
Efficacy Expansion Cohort: Urothelial CarcinomaDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with Grade 5 severity1 Participants
Efficacy Expansion Cohort: Urothelial CarcinomaDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with Treatment-Related TEAEs144 Participants
Efficacy Expansion Cohort: Urothelial CarcinomaDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with Grade 2 severity70 Participants
Efficacy Expansion Cohort: Urothelial CarcinomaDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with Grade 3 severity20 Participants
Efficacy Expansion Cohort: Urothelial CarcinomaDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with missing Grade0 Participants
Efficacy Expansion Cohort: GC/GEJC, Third LineDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with Grade 2 severity33 Participants
Efficacy Expansion Cohort: GC/GEJC, Third LineDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with Treatment-Related TEAEs71 Participants
Efficacy Expansion Cohort: GC/GEJC, Third LineDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with Grade 3 severity11 Participants
Efficacy Expansion Cohort: GC/GEJC, Third LineDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with missing Grade0 Participants
Efficacy Expansion Cohort: GC/GEJC, Third LineDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with Grade 1 severity25 Participants
Efficacy Expansion Cohort: GC/GEJC, Third LineDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with Grade 4 severity1 Participants
Efficacy Expansion Cohort: GC/GEJC, Third LineDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with Grade 5 severity1 Participants
Efficacy Expansion Cohort: HNSCCDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with Grade 2 severity34 Participants
Efficacy Expansion Cohort: HNSCCDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with Grade 4 severity1 Participants
Efficacy Expansion Cohort: HNSCCDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with Grade 1 severity39 Participants
Efficacy Expansion Cohort: HNSCCDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with Grade 3 severity9 Participants
Efficacy Expansion Cohort: HNSCCDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with missing Grade0 Participants
Efficacy Expansion Cohort: HNSCCDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with Treatment-Related TEAEs83 Participants
Efficacy Expansion Cohort: HNSCCDose Escalation and Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related TEAEs as Per SeverityParticipants with Treatment-Related TEAEs with Grade 5 severity0 Participants
Secondary

Dose Escalation Cohort (Excluding Once Weekly Avelumab 10 mg/kg Cohort): Apparent Terminal Half-Life (t1/2) of Avelumab

Apparent terminal half-life was defined as the time required for the serum concentration of drug to decrease 50 percent in the final stage of its elimination.

Time frame: Pre-infusion, at end of 1-hour infusion (Day 1), 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6,12, 24, 36, 48 hours after end of infusion

Population: Pharmacokinetic (PK) population included all participants who have completed at least 1 infusion of study drug, and who have provided sufficient concentration measurements. Here Overall number of participants analyzed signifies those who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 1.0 mg/kgDose Escalation Cohort (Excluding Once Weekly Avelumab 10 mg/kg Cohort): Apparent Terminal Half-Life (t1/2) of Avelumab61.425 Hours
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 3.0 mg/kgDose Escalation Cohort (Excluding Once Weekly Avelumab 10 mg/kg Cohort): Apparent Terminal Half-Life (t1/2) of Avelumab89.064 Hours
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 10.0 mg/kgDose Escalation Cohort (Excluding Once Weekly Avelumab 10 mg/kg Cohort): Apparent Terminal Half-Life (t1/2) of Avelumab97.440 Hours
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 20.0 mg/kgDose Escalation Cohort (Excluding Once Weekly Avelumab 10 mg/kg Cohort): Apparent Terminal Half-Life (t1/2) of Avelumab108.671 Hours
Secondary

Dose Escalation Cohort (Excluding Once Weekly Avelumab 10 mg/kg Cohort): Area Under Serum Concentration-Time Curve From the Time of Dosing to the Time of the Last Observation (AUC0-t) of Avelumab

Area under the serum concentration versus time curve from time zero to the last sampling time t at which the concentration is at or above the lower limit of quantification (LLLQ). AUC(0-t) was calculated according to the mixed log-linear trapezoidal rule.

Time frame: Pre-infusion, at end of 1-hour infusion (Day 1), 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6,12, 24, 36, 48 hours after end of infusion

Population: Pharmacokinetic (PK) population included all participants who have completed at least 1 infusion of study drug, and who have provided sufficient concentration measurements.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 1.0 mg/kgDose Escalation Cohort (Excluding Once Weekly Avelumab 10 mg/kg Cohort): Area Under Serum Concentration-Time Curve From the Time of Dosing to the Time of the Last Observation (AUC0-t) of Avelumab1040 Hours*micrograms per milliliterStandard Deviation 443
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 3.0 mg/kgDose Escalation Cohort (Excluding Once Weekly Avelumab 10 mg/kg Cohort): Area Under Serum Concentration-Time Curve From the Time of Dosing to the Time of the Last Observation (AUC0-t) of Avelumab6080 Hours*micrograms per milliliterStandard Deviation 1970
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 10.0 mg/kgDose Escalation Cohort (Excluding Once Weekly Avelumab 10 mg/kg Cohort): Area Under Serum Concentration-Time Curve From the Time of Dosing to the Time of the Last Observation (AUC0-t) of Avelumab22749.4 Hours*micrograms per milliliterStandard Deviation 7857.09
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 20.0 mg/kgDose Escalation Cohort (Excluding Once Weekly Avelumab 10 mg/kg Cohort): Area Under Serum Concentration-Time Curve From the Time of Dosing to the Time of the Last Observation (AUC0-t) of Avelumab45100 Hours*micrograms per milliliterStandard Deviation 15600
Secondary

Dose Escalation Cohort (Excluding Once Weekly Avelumab 10 mg/kg Cohort): Area Under the Serum Concentration-Time Curve From Time Zero to Infinity (AUC0-infinity) of Avelumab

The AUC(0-inf) was estimated by determining the total area under the curve of the concentration versus time curve extrapolated to infinity.

Time frame: Pre-infusion, at end of 1-hour infusion (Day 1), 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6,12, 24, 36, 48 hours after end of infusion

Population: Pharmacokinetic (PK) population included all participants who have completed at least 1 infusion of study drug, and who have provided sufficient concentration measurements. Here Overall number of participants analyzed signifies those who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 1.0 mg/kgDose Escalation Cohort (Excluding Once Weekly Avelumab 10 mg/kg Cohort): Area Under the Serum Concentration-Time Curve From Time Zero to Infinity (AUC0-infinity) of Avelumab1290 Hours*micrograms per milliliterStandard Deviation 650
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 3.0 mg/kgDose Escalation Cohort (Excluding Once Weekly Avelumab 10 mg/kg Cohort): Area Under the Serum Concentration-Time Curve From Time Zero to Infinity (AUC0-infinity) of Avelumab6850 Hours*micrograms per milliliterStandard Deviation 2100
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 10.0 mg/kgDose Escalation Cohort (Excluding Once Weekly Avelumab 10 mg/kg Cohort): Area Under the Serum Concentration-Time Curve From Time Zero to Infinity (AUC0-infinity) of Avelumab25920.9 Hours*micrograms per milliliterStandard Deviation 6753.76
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 20.0 mg/kgDose Escalation Cohort (Excluding Once Weekly Avelumab 10 mg/kg Cohort): Area Under the Serum Concentration-Time Curve From Time Zero to Infinity (AUC0-infinity) of Avelumab46600 Hours*micrograms per milliliterStandard Deviation 18500
Secondary

Dose Escalation Cohort (Excluding Once Weekly Avelumab 10 mg/kg Cohort): Maximum Observed Serum Concentration (Cmax) of Avelumab

Cmax is the maximum observed serum concentration obtained directly from the concentration versus time curve.

Time frame: Pre-infusion, at end of 1-hour infusion (Day 1), 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6,12, 24, 36, 48 hours after end of infusion

Population: Pharmacokinetic (PK) population included all participants who have completed at least 1 infusion of study drug, and who have provided sufficient concentration measurements.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 1.0 mg/kgDose Escalation Cohort (Excluding Once Weekly Avelumab 10 mg/kg Cohort): Maximum Observed Serum Concentration (Cmax) of Avelumab18.7 Micrograms per milliliter (mcg/mL)Standard Deviation 3.96
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 3.0 mg/kgDose Escalation Cohort (Excluding Once Weekly Avelumab 10 mg/kg Cohort): Maximum Observed Serum Concentration (Cmax) of Avelumab81.9 Micrograms per milliliter (mcg/mL)Standard Deviation 22.1
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 10.0 mg/kgDose Escalation Cohort (Excluding Once Weekly Avelumab 10 mg/kg Cohort): Maximum Observed Serum Concentration (Cmax) of Avelumab249.048 Micrograms per milliliter (mcg/mL)Standard Deviation 55.4697
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 20.0 mg/kgDose Escalation Cohort (Excluding Once Weekly Avelumab 10 mg/kg Cohort): Maximum Observed Serum Concentration (Cmax) of Avelumab489 Micrograms per milliliter (mcg/mL)Standard Deviation 140
Secondary

Dose Escalation Cohort (Excluding Once Weekly Avelumab 10 mg/kg Cohort): Number of Participants With at Least 1 Positive Anti Drug Antibodies (ADA)

Serum samples were analyzed by a validated electrochemiluminescence immunoassay to detect the presence of antidrug antibodies (ADA). Number of participants with ADA positive results for Avelumab were reported.

Time frame: Dose Escalation: Baseline up to Day 1023

Population: Safety analysis set included all participants who have received at least 1 dose of study treatment. Here Overall number of participants analyzed signifies those who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 1.0 mg/kgDose Escalation Cohort (Excluding Once Weekly Avelumab 10 mg/kg Cohort): Number of Participants With at Least 1 Positive Anti Drug Antibodies (ADA)0 Participants
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 3.0 mg/kgDose Escalation Cohort (Excluding Once Weekly Avelumab 10 mg/kg Cohort): Number of Participants With at Least 1 Positive Anti Drug Antibodies (ADA)2 Participants
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 10.0 mg/kgDose Escalation Cohort (Excluding Once Weekly Avelumab 10 mg/kg Cohort): Number of Participants With at Least 1 Positive Anti Drug Antibodies (ADA)0 Participants
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 20.0 mg/kgDose Escalation Cohort (Excluding Once Weekly Avelumab 10 mg/kg Cohort): Number of Participants With at Least 1 Positive Anti Drug Antibodies (ADA)0 Participants
Secondary

Dose Escalation Cohort (Excluding Once Weekly Avelumab 10 mg/kg Cohort): Number of Participants With Immune Related Best Overall Response (irBOR) According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC)

irBOR defined as best response of any of immune related complete response (irCR), immune related partial response (irPR), immune related stable disease (irSD) and immune related progressive disease (irPD) recorded from baseline until immune related disease progression and determined according to modified irRC per investigator assessment. irCR: Complete disappearance of all tumor lesions (both index and non-index lesions with no new measurable/unmeasurable lesions). irPR: At least 30% reduction from baseline in the sum of the longest diameter (SLD) of all lesions). irSD: SLD of target and new measurable lesions neither irCR, irPR, or irPD. irPD: SLD of target and new measurable lesions increases greater than or equal to \[\>=\] 20%, confirmed by a repeat, consecutive observations at least 4 weeks from the date first documented. Number of participants with immune-related best overall response in each category (irCR, irPR, irSD, irPD) was reported.

Time frame: Dose Escalation: Baseline up to Day 1023

Population: Safety analysis set included all participants who have received at least 1 dose of study treatment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 1.0 mg/kgDose Escalation Cohort (Excluding Once Weekly Avelumab 10 mg/kg Cohort): Number of Participants With Immune Related Best Overall Response (irBOR) According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC)Immune-related Stable Disease2 Participants
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 1.0 mg/kgDose Escalation Cohort (Excluding Once Weekly Avelumab 10 mg/kg Cohort): Number of Participants With Immune Related Best Overall Response (irBOR) According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC)Immune-related Progressive Disease0 Participants
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 1.0 mg/kgDose Escalation Cohort (Excluding Once Weekly Avelumab 10 mg/kg Cohort): Number of Participants With Immune Related Best Overall Response (irBOR) According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC)Not Evaluable2 Participants
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 1.0 mg/kgDose Escalation Cohort (Excluding Once Weekly Avelumab 10 mg/kg Cohort): Number of Participants With Immune Related Best Overall Response (irBOR) According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC)Immune-related Partial Response0 Participants
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 1.0 mg/kgDose Escalation Cohort (Excluding Once Weekly Avelumab 10 mg/kg Cohort): Number of Participants With Immune Related Best Overall Response (irBOR) According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC)Immune-related Complete Response0 Participants
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 3.0 mg/kgDose Escalation Cohort (Excluding Once Weekly Avelumab 10 mg/kg Cohort): Number of Participants With Immune Related Best Overall Response (irBOR) According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC)Immune-related Partial Response0 Participants
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 3.0 mg/kgDose Escalation Cohort (Excluding Once Weekly Avelumab 10 mg/kg Cohort): Number of Participants With Immune Related Best Overall Response (irBOR) According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC)Immune-related Stable Disease8 Participants
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 3.0 mg/kgDose Escalation Cohort (Excluding Once Weekly Avelumab 10 mg/kg Cohort): Number of Participants With Immune Related Best Overall Response (irBOR) According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC)Immune-related Complete Response0 Participants
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 3.0 mg/kgDose Escalation Cohort (Excluding Once Weekly Avelumab 10 mg/kg Cohort): Number of Participants With Immune Related Best Overall Response (irBOR) According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC)Immune-related Progressive Disease5 Participants
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 3.0 mg/kgDose Escalation Cohort (Excluding Once Weekly Avelumab 10 mg/kg Cohort): Number of Participants With Immune Related Best Overall Response (irBOR) According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC)Not Evaluable0 Participants
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 10.0 mg/kgDose Escalation Cohort (Excluding Once Weekly Avelumab 10 mg/kg Cohort): Number of Participants With Immune Related Best Overall Response (irBOR) According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC)Not Evaluable2 Participants
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 10.0 mg/kgDose Escalation Cohort (Excluding Once Weekly Avelumab 10 mg/kg Cohort): Number of Participants With Immune Related Best Overall Response (irBOR) According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC)Immune-related Complete Response0 Participants
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 10.0 mg/kgDose Escalation Cohort (Excluding Once Weekly Avelumab 10 mg/kg Cohort): Number of Participants With Immune Related Best Overall Response (irBOR) According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC)Immune-related Partial Response1 Participants
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 10.0 mg/kgDose Escalation Cohort (Excluding Once Weekly Avelumab 10 mg/kg Cohort): Number of Participants With Immune Related Best Overall Response (irBOR) According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC)Immune-related Stable Disease8 Participants
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 10.0 mg/kgDose Escalation Cohort (Excluding Once Weekly Avelumab 10 mg/kg Cohort): Number of Participants With Immune Related Best Overall Response (irBOR) According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC)Immune-related Progressive Disease4 Participants
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 20.0 mg/kgDose Escalation Cohort (Excluding Once Weekly Avelumab 10 mg/kg Cohort): Number of Participants With Immune Related Best Overall Response (irBOR) According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC)Immune-related Partial Response1 Participants
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 20.0 mg/kgDose Escalation Cohort (Excluding Once Weekly Avelumab 10 mg/kg Cohort): Number of Participants With Immune Related Best Overall Response (irBOR) According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC)Immune-related Progressive Disease1 Participants
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 20.0 mg/kgDose Escalation Cohort (Excluding Once Weekly Avelumab 10 mg/kg Cohort): Number of Participants With Immune Related Best Overall Response (irBOR) According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC)Immune-related Complete Response0 Participants
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 20.0 mg/kgDose Escalation Cohort (Excluding Once Weekly Avelumab 10 mg/kg Cohort): Number of Participants With Immune Related Best Overall Response (irBOR) According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC)Not Evaluable5 Participants
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 20.0 mg/kgDose Escalation Cohort (Excluding Once Weekly Avelumab 10 mg/kg Cohort): Number of Participants With Immune Related Best Overall Response (irBOR) According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC)Immune-related Stable Disease14 Participants
Secondary

Dose Escalation Cohort (Excluding Once Weekly Avelumab 10 mg/kg Cohort): Programmed Death Ligand 1 (PD-L1) Receptor Occupancy

Percentage of PD-L1 receptors occupied by avelumab on human lymphocytes (CD3+ T-cells) was assessed by flow cytometry on peripheral blood mononuclear cell (PBMC) samples. Greater than or equal to \[\>=\] 85 percent \[%\] of cell viability was required for reliable receptor occupancy assessment.

Time frame: Pre-infusion on Day 1; 48 hours after infusion on Day 3; Pre-infusion on Days 15, 43, and 85

Population: Safety analysis set included all participants who have received at least 1 dose of study treatment. Here Overall number of participants analyzed signifies those who were evaluable for this outcome measure and number analyzed signifies those who were evaluable for this outcome measure at specified time points.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 1.0 mg/kgDose Escalation Cohort (Excluding Once Weekly Avelumab 10 mg/kg Cohort): Programmed Death Ligand 1 (PD-L1) Receptor OccupancyDay 8519.8 Percentage of receptors
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 1.0 mg/kgDose Escalation Cohort (Excluding Once Weekly Avelumab 10 mg/kg Cohort): Programmed Death Ligand 1 (PD-L1) Receptor OccupancyDay 392.5 Percentage of receptorsStandard Deviation 1.99
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 1.0 mg/kgDose Escalation Cohort (Excluding Once Weekly Avelumab 10 mg/kg Cohort): Programmed Death Ligand 1 (PD-L1) Receptor OccupancyDay 1575.7 Percentage of receptorsStandard Deviation 22.12
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 1.0 mg/kgDose Escalation Cohort (Excluding Once Weekly Avelumab 10 mg/kg Cohort): Programmed Death Ligand 1 (PD-L1) Receptor OccupancyDay 4330.3 Percentage of receptors
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 3.0 mg/kgDose Escalation Cohort (Excluding Once Weekly Avelumab 10 mg/kg Cohort): Programmed Death Ligand 1 (PD-L1) Receptor OccupancyDay 380.1 Percentage of receptorsStandard Deviation 14.43
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 3.0 mg/kgDose Escalation Cohort (Excluding Once Weekly Avelumab 10 mg/kg Cohort): Programmed Death Ligand 1 (PD-L1) Receptor OccupancyDay 4396.8 Percentage of receptors
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 3.0 mg/kgDose Escalation Cohort (Excluding Once Weekly Avelumab 10 mg/kg Cohort): Programmed Death Ligand 1 (PD-L1) Receptor OccupancyDay 10.0 Percentage of receptorsStandard Deviation 0
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 3.0 mg/kgDose Escalation Cohort (Excluding Once Weekly Avelumab 10 mg/kg Cohort): Programmed Death Ligand 1 (PD-L1) Receptor OccupancyDay 1590.0 Percentage of receptorsStandard Deviation 8.11
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 10.0 mg/kgDose Escalation Cohort (Excluding Once Weekly Avelumab 10 mg/kg Cohort): Programmed Death Ligand 1 (PD-L1) Receptor OccupancyDay 1593.2 Percentage of receptorsStandard Deviation 1.29
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 20.0 mg/kgDose Escalation Cohort (Excluding Once Weekly Avelumab 10 mg/kg Cohort): Programmed Death Ligand 1 (PD-L1) Receptor OccupancyDay 10.0 Percentage of receptorsStandard Deviation 0
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 20.0 mg/kgDose Escalation Cohort (Excluding Once Weekly Avelumab 10 mg/kg Cohort): Programmed Death Ligand 1 (PD-L1) Receptor OccupancyDay 384.7 Percentage of receptorsStandard Deviation 12.83
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 20.0 mg/kgDose Escalation Cohort (Excluding Once Weekly Avelumab 10 mg/kg Cohort): Programmed Death Ligand 1 (PD-L1) Receptor OccupancyDay 1585.0 Percentage of receptorsStandard Deviation 8.73
Secondary

Dose Escalation Cohort (Excluding Once Weekly Avelumab 10 mg/kg Cohort): Time to Reach Maximum Observed Serum Concentration (Tmax) of Avelumab

Tmax is time to reach maximum observed serum concentration obtained directly from the concentration versus time curve.

Time frame: Pre-infusion, at end of 1-hour infusion (Day 1), 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6,12, 24, 36, 48 hours after end of infusion

Population: Pharmacokinetic (PK) population included all participants who have completed at least 1 infusion of study drug, and who have provided sufficient concentration measurements.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 1.0 mg/kgDose Escalation Cohort (Excluding Once Weekly Avelumab 10 mg/kg Cohort): Time to Reach Maximum Observed Serum Concentration (Tmax) of Avelumab1.500 Hours
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 3.0 mg/kgDose Escalation Cohort (Excluding Once Weekly Avelumab 10 mg/kg Cohort): Time to Reach Maximum Observed Serum Concentration (Tmax) of Avelumab1.500 Hours
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 10.0 mg/kgDose Escalation Cohort (Excluding Once Weekly Avelumab 10 mg/kg Cohort): Time to Reach Maximum Observed Serum Concentration (Tmax) of Avelumab1.500 Hours
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 20.0 mg/kgDose Escalation Cohort (Excluding Once Weekly Avelumab 10 mg/kg Cohort): Time to Reach Maximum Observed Serum Concentration (Tmax) of Avelumab1.717 Hours
Secondary

Dose Escalation Cohort: Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1

BOR was determined according to RECIST v1.1 and as per investigator assessment. BOR is defined as the best response of any of complete response (CR), partial response (PR), stable disease (SD) and progressive disease (PD) recorded from date of randomization until disease progression or recurrence (taking the smallest measurement recorded since start of treatment as reference). CR: Disappearance of all evidence of target and non-target lesions. PR: At least 30 percent (%) reduction from baseline in the sum of the longest diameter (SLD) of all lesions. SD =Neither sufficient increase to qualify for PD nor sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR. PD is defined as at least a 20 % increase in the SLD, taking as reference the smallest SLD recorded from baseline or appearance of 1 or more new lesions and unequivocal progression of non-target lesions. Number of participants with best overall response in each category (CR, PR, SD, PD) was reported.

Time frame: Dose Escalation: Baseline up to Day 2511

Population: Safety analysis set included all participants who have received at least 1 dose of study treatment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 1.0 mg/kgDose Escalation Cohort: Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1Partial Response0 Participants
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 1.0 mg/kgDose Escalation Cohort: Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1Stable Disease2 Participants
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 1.0 mg/kgDose Escalation Cohort: Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1Complete Response0 Participants
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 1.0 mg/kgDose Escalation Cohort: Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1Not Evaluable2 Participants
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 1.0 mg/kgDose Escalation Cohort: Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1Progressive Disease0 Participants
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 3.0 mg/kgDose Escalation Cohort: Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1Stable Disease8 Participants
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 3.0 mg/kgDose Escalation Cohort: Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1Complete Response0 Participants
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 3.0 mg/kgDose Escalation Cohort: Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1Partial Response0 Participants
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 3.0 mg/kgDose Escalation Cohort: Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1Progressive Disease5 Participants
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 3.0 mg/kgDose Escalation Cohort: Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1Not Evaluable0 Participants
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 10.0 mg/kgDose Escalation Cohort: Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1Not Evaluable2 Participants
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 10.0 mg/kgDose Escalation Cohort: Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1Complete Response0 Participants
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 10.0 mg/kgDose Escalation Cohort: Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1Stable Disease8 Participants
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 10.0 mg/kgDose Escalation Cohort: Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1Progressive Disease4 Participants
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 10.0 mg/kgDose Escalation Cohort: Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1Partial Response1 Participants
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 20.0 mg/kgDose Escalation Cohort: Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1Partial Response1 Participants
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 20.0 mg/kgDose Escalation Cohort: Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1Complete Response0 Participants
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 20.0 mg/kgDose Escalation Cohort: Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1Stable Disease14 Participants
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 20.0 mg/kgDose Escalation Cohort: Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1Not Evaluable3 Participants
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 20.0 mg/kgDose Escalation Cohort: Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1Progressive Disease3 Participants
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 10.0 mg/kg WeeklyDose Escalation Cohort: Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1Progressive Disease1 Participants
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 10.0 mg/kg WeeklyDose Escalation Cohort: Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1Stable Disease4 Participants
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 10.0 mg/kg WeeklyDose Escalation Cohort: Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1Not Evaluable2 Participants
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 10.0 mg/kg WeeklyDose Escalation Cohort: Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1Complete Response0 Participants
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 10.0 mg/kg WeeklyDose Escalation Cohort: Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1Partial Response1 Participants
Secondary

Dose Expansion Cohort: Duration of Response According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC) Per Investigator Assessment

Duration of response according to modified irRC, per investigator assessment was calculated for each participant with a confirmed response (immune-related complete response \[irCR\] or immune-related partial response \[irPR\]) as the time from the first observation of response to the first observation of documented disease progression (or death within 12 weeks of the last tumor assessment). irCR: Complete disappearance of all tumor lesions (both index and non-index lesions with no new measurable/unmeasurable lesions). irPR: At least 30% reduction from baseline in the sum of the longest diameter (SLD) of all lesions). Results were calculated based on Kaplan-Meier estimates.

Time frame: Dose Expansion: Baseline up to Day 2023

Population: FAS included all participants who have received at least 1 dose of study treatment. Data for this outcome measure is reported for the participants with Complete or Partial response.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 1.0 mg/kgDose Expansion Cohort: Duration of Response According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC) Per Investigator Assessment21.13 Months
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 3.0 mg/kgDose Expansion Cohort: Duration of Response According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC) Per Investigator AssessmentNA Months
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 10.0 mg/kgDose Expansion Cohort: Duration of Response According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC) Per Investigator Assessment8.31 Months
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 20.0 mg/kgDose Expansion Cohort: Duration of Response According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC) Per Investigator Assessment4.14 Months
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 10.0 mg/kg WeeklyDose Expansion Cohort: Duration of Response According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC) Per Investigator Assessment22.23 Months
Primary Expansion Cohort: Metastatic Breast CancerDose Expansion Cohort: Duration of Response According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC) Per Investigator AssessmentNA Months
Primary Expansion Cohort: GC/GEJC ProgressedDose Expansion Cohort: Duration of Response According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC) Per Investigator AssessmentNA Months
Primary Expansion Cohort: GC/GEJC Non ProgressedDose Expansion Cohort: Duration of Response According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC) Per Investigator Assessment15.21 Months
Secondary Expansion Cohort: Colorectal CancerDose Expansion Cohort: Duration of Response According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC) Per Investigator AssessmentNA Months
Secondary Expansion Cohort: Castrate-resistant Prostate CancerDose Expansion Cohort: Duration of Response According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC) Per Investigator AssessmentNA Months
Secondary Expansion Cohort: Adrenocortical CarcinomaDose Expansion Cohort: Duration of Response According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC) Per Investigator Assessment10.61 Months
Secondary Expansion Cohort: MelanomaDose Expansion Cohort: Duration of Response According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC) Per Investigator AssessmentNA Months
Secondary Expansion Cohort: MesotheliomaDose Expansion Cohort: Duration of Response According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC) Per Investigator AssessmentNA Months
Secondary Expansion Cohort: Urothelial CarcinomaDose Expansion Cohort: Duration of Response According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC) Per Investigator AssessmentNA Months
Secondary Expansion Cohort: Ovarian CancerDose Expansion Cohort: Duration of Response According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC) Per Investigator AssessmentNA Months
Secondary Expansion Cohort: Renal Cell Carcinoma (First Line)Dose Expansion Cohort: Duration of Response According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC) Per Investigator AssessmentNA Months
Secondary

Dose Expansion Cohort: Duration of Response According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 Per Investigator Assessment

Duration of response according to RECIST 1.1, per investigator assessment was calculated for each participant with a confirmed response (complete response \[CR\] or partial response \[PR\]) as the time from the first observation of response to the first observation of documented disease progression (or death within 12 weeks of the last tumor assessment). CR: Disappearance of all evidence of target and non-target lesions. PR: At least 30 percent (%) reduction from baseline in the sum of the longest diameter (SLD) of all lesions. Results were calculated based on Kaplan-Meier estimates.

Time frame: Dose Expansion: Baseline up to Day 2023

Population: FAS included all participants who have received at least 1 dose of study treatment. Data for this outcome measure is reported for the participants with Complete or Partial response.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 1.0 mg/kgDose Expansion Cohort: Duration of Response According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 Per Investigator Assessment17.48 Months
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 3.0 mg/kgDose Expansion Cohort: Duration of Response According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 Per Investigator Assessment12.02 Months
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 10.0 mg/kgDose Expansion Cohort: Duration of Response According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 Per Investigator Assessment8.33 Months
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 20.0 mg/kgDose Expansion Cohort: Duration of Response According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 Per Investigator Assessment3.48 Months
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 10.0 mg/kg WeeklyDose Expansion Cohort: Duration of Response According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 Per Investigator Assessment21.42 Months
Primary Expansion Cohort: Metastatic Breast CancerDose Expansion Cohort: Duration of Response According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 Per Investigator Assessment8.41 Months
Primary Expansion Cohort: GC/GEJC ProgressedDose Expansion Cohort: Duration of Response According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 Per Investigator AssessmentNA Months
Primary Expansion Cohort: GC/GEJC Non ProgressedDose Expansion Cohort: Duration of Response According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 Per Investigator Assessment15.21 Months
Secondary Expansion Cohort: Colorectal CancerDose Expansion Cohort: Duration of Response According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 Per Investigator AssessmentNA Months
Secondary Expansion Cohort: Castrate-resistant Prostate CancerDose Expansion Cohort: Duration of Response According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 Per Investigator Assessment10.38 Months
Secondary Expansion Cohort: Adrenocortical CarcinomaDose Expansion Cohort: Duration of Response According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 Per Investigator Assessment9.94 Months
Secondary Expansion Cohort: MelanomaDose Expansion Cohort: Duration of Response According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 Per Investigator AssessmentNA Months
Secondary Expansion Cohort: MesotheliomaDose Expansion Cohort: Duration of Response According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 Per Investigator AssessmentNA Months
Secondary Expansion Cohort: Urothelial CarcinomaDose Expansion Cohort: Duration of Response According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 Per Investigator AssessmentNA Months
Secondary Expansion Cohort: Ovarian CancerDose Expansion Cohort: Duration of Response According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 Per Investigator AssessmentNA Months
Secondary Expansion Cohort: Renal Cell Carcinoma (First Line)Dose Expansion Cohort: Duration of Response According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 Per Investigator AssessmentNA Months
Secondary

Dose Expansion Cohort: Immune Related Progression-Free Survival (irPFS) Time According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC)

The irPFS time was defined as the time from first administration of study treatment until first documentation of immune-related progressive disease (irPD) or death when death occurred within 12 weeks of the last tumor assessment or first administration of study treatment (whichever was later). irPD: sum of the longest diameters of target and new measurable lesions increases greater than or equal to \[\>=\] 20%, confirmed by a repeat, consecutive observations at least 4 weeks from the date first documented. The analysis of irPFS will be performed with a Kaplan-Meier method. Data for immune related progression-free survival time has been reported.

Time frame: Dose Expansion: Baseline up to Day 2023

Population: FAS included all participants who have received at least 1 dose of study treatment. Here Overall Number of Participants Analyzed signifies those participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 1.0 mg/kgDose Expansion Cohort: Immune Related Progression-Free Survival (irPFS) Time According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC)4.04 Months
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 3.0 mg/kgDose Expansion Cohort: Immune Related Progression-Free Survival (irPFS) Time According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC)6.93 Months
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 10.0 mg/kgDose Expansion Cohort: Immune Related Progression-Free Survival (irPFS) Time According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC)1.64 Months
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 20.0 mg/kgDose Expansion Cohort: Immune Related Progression-Free Survival (irPFS) Time According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC)1.81 Months
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 10.0 mg/kg WeeklyDose Expansion Cohort: Immune Related Progression-Free Survival (irPFS) Time According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC)4.14 Months
Primary Expansion Cohort: NSCLC, Post-platinum DoubletDose Expansion Cohort: Immune Related Progression-Free Survival (irPFS) Time According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC)2.79 Months
Primary Expansion Cohort: NSCLC, First LineDose Expansion Cohort: Immune Related Progression-Free Survival (irPFS) Time According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC)NA Months
Primary Expansion Cohort: Metastatic Breast CancerDose Expansion Cohort: Immune Related Progression-Free Survival (irPFS) Time According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC)3.81 Months
Primary Expansion Cohort: GC/GEJC ProgressedDose Expansion Cohort: Immune Related Progression-Free Survival (irPFS) Time According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC)6.83 Months
Primary Expansion Cohort: GC/GEJC Non ProgressedDose Expansion Cohort: Immune Related Progression-Free Survival (irPFS) Time According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC)6.18 Months
Secondary Expansion Cohort: Colorectal CancerDose Expansion Cohort: Immune Related Progression-Free Survival (irPFS) Time According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC)4.07 Months
Secondary Expansion Cohort: Castrate-resistant Prostate CancerDose Expansion Cohort: Immune Related Progression-Free Survival (irPFS) Time According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC)4.04 Months
Secondary Expansion Cohort: Adrenocortical CarcinomaDose Expansion Cohort: Immune Related Progression-Free Survival (irPFS) Time According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC)8.34 Months
Secondary Expansion Cohort: MelanomaDose Expansion Cohort: Immune Related Progression-Free Survival (irPFS) Time According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC)6.90 Months
Secondary Expansion Cohort: MesotheliomaDose Expansion Cohort: Immune Related Progression-Free Survival (irPFS) Time According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC)2.60 Months
Secondary Expansion Cohort: Urothelial CarcinomaDose Expansion Cohort: Immune Related Progression-Free Survival (irPFS) Time According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC)2.46 Months
Secondary Expansion Cohort: Ovarian CancerDose Expansion Cohort: Immune Related Progression-Free Survival (irPFS) Time According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC)1.35 Months
Secondary Expansion Cohort: Renal Cell Carcinoma (First Line)Dose Expansion Cohort: Immune Related Progression-Free Survival (irPFS) Time According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC)2.83 Months
Secondary

Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Atleast 1 Positive Anti Drug Antibodies (ADA) Assay

Serum samples were analyzed by a validated electrochemiluminescence immunoassay to detect the presence of antidrug antibodies (ADA). Number of participants with ADA positive results for Avelumab were reported.

Time frame: Dose Expansion: Baseline up to Day 2023

Population: Safety analysis set included all participants who have received at least 1 dose of study treatment. Here Overall number of participants analyzed signifies those who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 1.0 mg/kgDose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Atleast 1 Positive Anti Drug Antibodies (ADA) Assay17 Participants
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 3.0 mg/kgDose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Atleast 1 Positive Anti Drug Antibodies (ADA) Assay9 Participants
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 10.0 mg/kgDose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Atleast 1 Positive Anti Drug Antibodies (ADA) Assay17 Participants
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 20.0 mg/kgDose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Atleast 1 Positive Anti Drug Antibodies (ADA) Assay3 Participants
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 10.0 mg/kg WeeklyDose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Atleast 1 Positive Anti Drug Antibodies (ADA) Assay6 Participants
Primary Expansion Cohort: NSCLC, Post-platinum DoubletDose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Atleast 1 Positive Anti Drug Antibodies (ADA) Assay0 Participants
Primary Expansion Cohort: NSCLC, First LineDose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Atleast 1 Positive Anti Drug Antibodies (ADA) Assay0 Participants
Primary Expansion Cohort: Metastatic Breast CancerDose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Atleast 1 Positive Anti Drug Antibodies (ADA) Assay4 Participants
Primary Expansion Cohort: GC/GEJC ProgressedDose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Atleast 1 Positive Anti Drug Antibodies (ADA) Assay5 Participants
Primary Expansion Cohort: GC/GEJC Non ProgressedDose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Atleast 1 Positive Anti Drug Antibodies (ADA) Assay3 Participants
Secondary Expansion Cohort: Colorectal CancerDose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Atleast 1 Positive Anti Drug Antibodies (ADA) Assay2 Participants
Secondary Expansion Cohort: Castrate-resistant Prostate CancerDose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Atleast 1 Positive Anti Drug Antibodies (ADA) Assay5 Participants
Secondary Expansion Cohort: Adrenocortical CarcinomaDose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Atleast 1 Positive Anti Drug Antibodies (ADA) Assay5 Participants
Secondary Expansion Cohort: MelanomaDose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Atleast 1 Positive Anti Drug Antibodies (ADA) Assay3 Participants
Secondary Expansion Cohort: MesotheliomaDose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Atleast 1 Positive Anti Drug Antibodies (ADA) Assay5 Participants
Secondary Expansion Cohort: Urothelial CarcinomaDose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Atleast 1 Positive Anti Drug Antibodies (ADA) Assay17 Participants
Secondary Expansion Cohort: Ovarian CancerDose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Atleast 1 Positive Anti Drug Antibodies (ADA) Assay6 Participants
Secondary Expansion Cohort: Renal Cell Carcinoma (First Line)Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Atleast 1 Positive Anti Drug Antibodies (ADA) Assay5 Participants
Secondary

Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1

BOR was determined according to RECIST v1.1 and as per investigator assessment. BOR is defined as the best response of any of complete response (CR), partial response (PR), stable disease (SD) and progressive disease (PD) recorded from date of randomization until disease progression or recurrence (taking the smallest measurement recorded since start of treatment as reference). CR: Disappearance of all evidence of target and non-target lesions. PR: At least 30 percent (%) reduction from baseline in the sum of the longest diameter (SLD) of all lesions. SD = Neither sufficient increase to qualify for PD nor sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR. PD is defined as at least a 20 % increase in the SLD, taking as reference the smallest SLD recorded from baseline or appearance of 1 or more new lesions and unequivocal progression of non-target lesions. Number of participants with best overall response in each category (CR, PR, SD, PD) was reported.

Time frame: Dose Expansion: Baseline up to Day 2023

Population: Full analysis set (FAS) included all participants who have received at least 1 dose of study treatment. Here Overall Number of Participants Analyzed signifies those participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 1.0 mg/kgDose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1Progressive Disease68 Participants
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 1.0 mg/kgDose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1Complete Response2 Participants
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 1.0 mg/kgDose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1Partial Response24 Participants
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 1.0 mg/kgDose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1Not Evaluable24 Participants
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 1.0 mg/kgDose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1Stable Disease66 Participants
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 3.0 mg/kgDose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1Complete Response3 Participants
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 3.0 mg/kgDose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1Progressive Disease40 Participants
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 3.0 mg/kgDose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1Stable Disease68 Participants
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 3.0 mg/kgDose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1Partial Response28 Participants
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 3.0 mg/kgDose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1Not Evaluable17 Participants
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 10.0 mg/kgDose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1Complete Response1 Participants
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 10.0 mg/kgDose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1Progressive Disease107 Participants
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 10.0 mg/kgDose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1Partial Response4 Participants
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 10.0 mg/kgDose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1Stable Disease41 Participants
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 10.0 mg/kgDose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1Not Evaluable15 Participants
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 20.0 mg/kgDose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1Complete Response0 Participants
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 20.0 mg/kgDose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1Progressive Disease36 Participants
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 20.0 mg/kgDose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1Not Evaluable7 Participants
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 20.0 mg/kgDose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1Partial Response4 Participants
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 20.0 mg/kgDose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1Stable Disease13 Participants
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 10.0 mg/kg WeeklyDose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1Partial Response4 Participants
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 10.0 mg/kg WeeklyDose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1Complete Response2 Participants
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 10.0 mg/kg WeeklyDose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1Progressive Disease29 Participants
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 10.0 mg/kg WeeklyDose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1Not Evaluable10 Participants
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 10.0 mg/kg WeeklyDose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1Stable Disease45 Participants
Primary Expansion Cohort: NSCLC, Post-platinum DoubletDose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1Complete Response0 Participants
Primary Expansion Cohort: NSCLC, Post-platinum DoubletDose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1Partial Response0 Participants
Primary Expansion Cohort: NSCLC, Post-platinum DoubletDose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1Stable Disease9 Participants
Primary Expansion Cohort: NSCLC, Post-platinum DoubletDose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1Progressive Disease9 Participants
Primary Expansion Cohort: NSCLC, Post-platinum DoubletDose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1Not Evaluable3 Participants
Primary Expansion Cohort: NSCLC, First LineDose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1Progressive Disease5 Participants
Primary Expansion Cohort: NSCLC, First LineDose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1Not Evaluable3 Participants
Primary Expansion Cohort: NSCLC, First LineDose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1Complete Response0 Participants
Primary Expansion Cohort: NSCLC, First LineDose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1Partial Response0 Participants
Primary Expansion Cohort: NSCLC, First LineDose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1Stable Disease10 Participants
Primary Expansion Cohort: Metastatic Breast CancerDose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1Complete Response0 Participants
Primary Expansion Cohort: Metastatic Breast CancerDose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1Progressive Disease22 Participants
Primary Expansion Cohort: Metastatic Breast CancerDose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1Stable Disease21 Participants
Primary Expansion Cohort: Metastatic Breast CancerDose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1Not Evaluable4 Participants
Primary Expansion Cohort: Metastatic Breast CancerDose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1Partial Response3 Participants
Primary Expansion Cohort: GC/GEJC ProgressedDose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1Not Evaluable7 Participants
Primary Expansion Cohort: GC/GEJC ProgressedDose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1Complete Response4 Participants
Primary Expansion Cohort: GC/GEJC ProgressedDose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1Stable Disease16 Participants
Primary Expansion Cohort: GC/GEJC ProgressedDose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1Progressive Disease17 Participants
Primary Expansion Cohort: GC/GEJC ProgressedDose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1Partial Response7 Participants
Primary Expansion Cohort: GC/GEJC Non ProgressedDose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1Complete Response1 Participants
Primary Expansion Cohort: GC/GEJC Non ProgressedDose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1Stable Disease26 Participants
Primary Expansion Cohort: GC/GEJC Non ProgressedDose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1Partial Response4 Participants
Primary Expansion Cohort: GC/GEJC Non ProgressedDose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1Progressive Disease18 Participants
Primary Expansion Cohort: GC/GEJC Non ProgressedDose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1Not Evaluable4 Participants
Secondary Expansion Cohort: Colorectal CancerDose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1Not Evaluable4 Participants
Secondary Expansion Cohort: Colorectal CancerDose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1Partial Response4 Participants
Secondary Expansion Cohort: Colorectal CancerDose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1Progressive Disease14 Participants
Secondary Expansion Cohort: Colorectal CancerDose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1Stable Disease20 Participants
Secondary Expansion Cohort: Colorectal CancerDose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1Complete Response2 Participants
Secondary Expansion Cohort: Castrate-resistant Prostate CancerDose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1Progressive Disease51 Participants
Secondary Expansion Cohort: Castrate-resistant Prostate CancerDose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1Stable Disease53 Participants
Secondary Expansion Cohort: Castrate-resistant Prostate CancerDose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1Partial Response11 Participants
Secondary Expansion Cohort: Castrate-resistant Prostate CancerDose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1Complete Response1 Participants
Secondary Expansion Cohort: Castrate-resistant Prostate CancerDose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1Not Evaluable9 Participants
Secondary Expansion Cohort: Adrenocortical CarcinomaDose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1Not Evaluable3 Participants
Secondary Expansion Cohort: Adrenocortical CarcinomaDose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1Complete Response1 Participants
Secondary Expansion Cohort: Adrenocortical CarcinomaDose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1Partial Response9 Participants
Secondary Expansion Cohort: Adrenocortical CarcinomaDose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1Stable Disease38 Participants
Secondary Expansion Cohort: Adrenocortical CarcinomaDose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1Progressive Disease11 Participants
Secondary Expansion Cohort: MelanomaDose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1Progressive Disease4 Participants
Secondary Expansion Cohort: MelanomaDose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1Complete Response0 Participants
Secondary Expansion Cohort: MelanomaDose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1Stable Disease13 Participants
Secondary Expansion Cohort: MelanomaDose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1Partial Response2 Participants
Secondary Expansion Cohort: MelanomaDose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1Not Evaluable1 Participants
Secondary Expansion Cohort: MesotheliomaDose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1Not Evaluable13 Participants
Secondary Expansion Cohort: MesotheliomaDose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1Complete Response3 Participants
Secondary Expansion Cohort: MesotheliomaDose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1Progressive Disease46 Participants
Secondary Expansion Cohort: MesotheliomaDose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1Partial Response4 Participants
Secondary Expansion Cohort: MesotheliomaDose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1Stable Disease37 Participants
Secondary Expansion Cohort: Urothelial CarcinomaDose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1Partial Response24 Participants
Secondary Expansion Cohort: Urothelial CarcinomaDose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1Not Evaluable35 Participants
Secondary Expansion Cohort: Urothelial CarcinomaDose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1Stable Disease45 Participants
Secondary Expansion Cohort: Urothelial CarcinomaDose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1Progressive Disease87 Participants
Secondary Expansion Cohort: Urothelial CarcinomaDose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1Complete Response7 Participants
Secondary Expansion Cohort: Ovarian CancerDose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1Stable Disease23 Participants
Secondary Expansion Cohort: Ovarian CancerDose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1Not Evaluable21 Participants
Secondary Expansion Cohort: Ovarian CancerDose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1Progressive Disease80 Participants
Secondary Expansion Cohort: Ovarian CancerDose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1Partial Response7 Participants
Secondary Expansion Cohort: Ovarian CancerDose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1Complete Response1 Participants
Secondary Expansion Cohort: Renal Cell Carcinoma (First Line)Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1Progressive Disease66 Participants
Secondary Expansion Cohort: Renal Cell Carcinoma (First Line)Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1Partial Response15 Participants
Secondary Expansion Cohort: Renal Cell Carcinoma (First Line)Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1Stable Disease50 Participants
Secondary Expansion Cohort: Renal Cell Carcinoma (First Line)Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1Not Evaluable17 Participants
Secondary Expansion Cohort: Renal Cell Carcinoma (First Line)Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1Complete Response5 Participants
Secondary

Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Immune Related Best Overall Response (irBOR) According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC)

irBOR defined as best response of any of immune related complete response (irCR), immune related partial response (irPR), immune related stable disease (irSD) and immune related progressive disease (irPD) recorded from baseline until immune related disease progression and determined according to modified irRC per investigator assessment. irCR: Complete disappearance of all tumor lesions (both index and non-index lesions with no new measurable/unmeasurable lesions). irPR: At least 30% reduction from baseline in the sum of the longest diameter (SLD) of all lesions). irSD: SLD of target and new measurable lesions neither irCR, irPR, or irPD. irPD: SLD of target and new measurable lesions increases greater than or equal to \[\>=\] 20%, confirmed by a repeat, consecutive observations at least 4 weeks from the date first documented. Number of participants with immune-related best overall response in each category (irCR, irPR, irSD, irPD) was reported.

Time frame: Dose Expansion: Baseline up to Day 2023

Population: Full analysis set (FAS) included all participants who have received at least 1 dose of study treatment. Here Overall Number of Participants Analyzed signifies those participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 1.0 mg/kgDose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Immune Related Best Overall Response (irBOR) According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC)Immune-related Complete Response2 Participants
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 1.0 mg/kgDose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Immune Related Best Overall Response (irBOR) According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC)Not Evaluable40 Participants
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 1.0 mg/kgDose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Immune Related Best Overall Response (irBOR) According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC)Immune-related Partial Response26 Participants
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 1.0 mg/kgDose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Immune Related Best Overall Response (irBOR) According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC)Immune-related Stable Disease80 Participants
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 1.0 mg/kgDose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Immune Related Best Overall Response (irBOR) According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC)Immune-related Progressive Disease36 Participants
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 3.0 mg/kgDose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Immune Related Best Overall Response (irBOR) According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC)Immune-related Progressive Disease21 Participants
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 3.0 mg/kgDose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Immune Related Best Overall Response (irBOR) According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC)Immune-related Stable Disease78 Participants
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 3.0 mg/kgDose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Immune Related Best Overall Response (irBOR) According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC)Immune-related Complete Response4 Participants
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 3.0 mg/kgDose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Immune Related Best Overall Response (irBOR) According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC)Immune-related Partial Response31 Participants
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 3.0 mg/kgDose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Immune Related Best Overall Response (irBOR) According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC)Not Evaluable22 Participants
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 10.0 mg/kgDose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Immune Related Best Overall Response (irBOR) According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC)Not Evaluable32 Participants
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 10.0 mg/kgDose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Immune Related Best Overall Response (irBOR) According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC)Immune-related Progressive Disease69 Participants
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 10.0 mg/kgDose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Immune Related Best Overall Response (irBOR) According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC)Immune-related Partial Response6 Participants
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 10.0 mg/kgDose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Immune Related Best Overall Response (irBOR) According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC)Immune-related Stable Disease60 Participants
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 10.0 mg/kgDose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Immune Related Best Overall Response (irBOR) According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC)Immune-related Complete Response1 Participants
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 20.0 mg/kgDose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Immune Related Best Overall Response (irBOR) According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC)Not Evaluable35 Participants
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 20.0 mg/kgDose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Immune Related Best Overall Response (irBOR) According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC)Immune-related Complete Response0 Participants
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 20.0 mg/kgDose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Immune Related Best Overall Response (irBOR) According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC)Immune-related Progressive Disease0 Participants
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 20.0 mg/kgDose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Immune Related Best Overall Response (irBOR) According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC)Immune-related Stable Disease20 Participants
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 20.0 mg/kgDose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Immune Related Best Overall Response (irBOR) According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC)Immune-related Partial Response5 Participants
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 10.0 mg/kg WeeklyDose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Immune Related Best Overall Response (irBOR) According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC)Immune-related Progressive Disease0 Participants
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 10.0 mg/kg WeeklyDose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Immune Related Best Overall Response (irBOR) According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC)Immune-related Complete Response2 Participants
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 10.0 mg/kg WeeklyDose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Immune Related Best Overall Response (irBOR) According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC)Not Evaluable31 Participants
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 10.0 mg/kg WeeklyDose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Immune Related Best Overall Response (irBOR) According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC)Immune-related Partial Response4 Participants
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 10.0 mg/kg WeeklyDose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Immune Related Best Overall Response (irBOR) According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC)Immune-related Stable Disease53 Participants
Primary Expansion Cohort: NSCLC, Post-platinum DoubletDose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Immune Related Best Overall Response (irBOR) According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC)Not Evaluable7 Participants
Primary Expansion Cohort: NSCLC, Post-platinum DoubletDose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Immune Related Best Overall Response (irBOR) According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC)Immune-related Complete Response0 Participants
Primary Expansion Cohort: NSCLC, Post-platinum DoubletDose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Immune Related Best Overall Response (irBOR) According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC)Immune-related Stable Disease9 Participants
Primary Expansion Cohort: NSCLC, Post-platinum DoubletDose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Immune Related Best Overall Response (irBOR) According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC)Immune-related Partial Response0 Participants
Primary Expansion Cohort: NSCLC, Post-platinum DoubletDose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Immune Related Best Overall Response (irBOR) According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC)Immune-related Progressive Disease5 Participants
Primary Expansion Cohort: NSCLC, First LineDose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Immune Related Best Overall Response (irBOR) According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC)Not Evaluable14 Participants
Primary Expansion Cohort: NSCLC, First LineDose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Immune Related Best Overall Response (irBOR) According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC)Immune-related Complete Response0 Participants
Primary Expansion Cohort: NSCLC, First LineDose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Immune Related Best Overall Response (irBOR) According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC)Immune-related Stable Disease3 Participants
Primary Expansion Cohort: NSCLC, First LineDose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Immune Related Best Overall Response (irBOR) According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC)Immune-related Partial Response0 Participants
Primary Expansion Cohort: NSCLC, First LineDose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Immune Related Best Overall Response (irBOR) According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC)Immune-related Progressive Disease1 Participants
Primary Expansion Cohort: Metastatic Breast CancerDose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Immune Related Best Overall Response (irBOR) According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC)Immune-related Complete Response0 Participants
Primary Expansion Cohort: Metastatic Breast CancerDose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Immune Related Best Overall Response (irBOR) According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC)Immune-related Progressive Disease14 Participants
Primary Expansion Cohort: Metastatic Breast CancerDose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Immune Related Best Overall Response (irBOR) According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC)Immune-related Partial Response3 Participants
Primary Expansion Cohort: Metastatic Breast CancerDose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Immune Related Best Overall Response (irBOR) According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC)Not Evaluable7 Participants
Primary Expansion Cohort: Metastatic Breast CancerDose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Immune Related Best Overall Response (irBOR) According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC)Immune-related Stable Disease26 Participants
Primary Expansion Cohort: GC/GEJC ProgressedDose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Immune Related Best Overall Response (irBOR) According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC)Immune-related Partial Response7 Participants
Primary Expansion Cohort: GC/GEJC ProgressedDose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Immune Related Best Overall Response (irBOR) According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC)Immune-related Progressive Disease11 Participants
Primary Expansion Cohort: GC/GEJC ProgressedDose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Immune Related Best Overall Response (irBOR) According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC)Immune-related Stable Disease20 Participants
Primary Expansion Cohort: GC/GEJC ProgressedDose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Immune Related Best Overall Response (irBOR) According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC)Immune-related Complete Response4 Participants
Primary Expansion Cohort: GC/GEJC ProgressedDose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Immune Related Best Overall Response (irBOR) According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC)Not Evaluable9 Participants
Primary Expansion Cohort: GC/GEJC Non ProgressedDose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Immune Related Best Overall Response (irBOR) According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC)Immune-related Progressive Disease10 Participants
Primary Expansion Cohort: GC/GEJC Non ProgressedDose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Immune Related Best Overall Response (irBOR) According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC)Immune-related Partial Response4 Participants
Primary Expansion Cohort: GC/GEJC Non ProgressedDose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Immune Related Best Overall Response (irBOR) According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC)Immune-related Complete Response1 Participants
Primary Expansion Cohort: GC/GEJC Non ProgressedDose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Immune Related Best Overall Response (irBOR) According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC)Not Evaluable7 Participants
Primary Expansion Cohort: GC/GEJC Non ProgressedDose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Immune Related Best Overall Response (irBOR) According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC)Immune-related Stable Disease31 Participants
Secondary Expansion Cohort: Colorectal CancerDose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Immune Related Best Overall Response (irBOR) According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC)Immune-related Complete Response2 Participants
Secondary Expansion Cohort: Colorectal CancerDose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Immune Related Best Overall Response (irBOR) According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC)Immune-related Partial Response5 Participants
Secondary Expansion Cohort: Colorectal CancerDose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Immune Related Best Overall Response (irBOR) According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC)Immune-related Progressive Disease10 Participants
Secondary Expansion Cohort: Colorectal CancerDose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Immune Related Best Overall Response (irBOR) According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC)Not Evaluable6 Participants
Secondary Expansion Cohort: Colorectal CancerDose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Immune Related Best Overall Response (irBOR) According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC)Immune-related Stable Disease21 Participants
Secondary Expansion Cohort: Castrate-resistant Prostate CancerDose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Immune Related Best Overall Response (irBOR) According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC)Immune-related Progressive Disease27 Participants
Secondary Expansion Cohort: Castrate-resistant Prostate CancerDose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Immune Related Best Overall Response (irBOR) According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC)Not Evaluable21 Participants
Secondary Expansion Cohort: Castrate-resistant Prostate CancerDose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Immune Related Best Overall Response (irBOR) According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC)Immune-related Complete Response1 Participants
Secondary Expansion Cohort: Castrate-resistant Prostate CancerDose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Immune Related Best Overall Response (irBOR) According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC)Immune-related Partial Response15 Participants
Secondary Expansion Cohort: Castrate-resistant Prostate CancerDose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Immune Related Best Overall Response (irBOR) According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC)Immune-related Stable Disease61 Participants
Secondary Expansion Cohort: Adrenocortical CarcinomaDose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Immune Related Best Overall Response (irBOR) According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC)Immune-related Progressive Disease6 Participants
Secondary Expansion Cohort: Adrenocortical CarcinomaDose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Immune Related Best Overall Response (irBOR) According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC)Not Evaluable5 Participants
Secondary Expansion Cohort: Adrenocortical CarcinomaDose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Immune Related Best Overall Response (irBOR) According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC)Immune-related Partial Response10 Participants
Secondary Expansion Cohort: Adrenocortical CarcinomaDose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Immune Related Best Overall Response (irBOR) According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC)Immune-related Complete Response1 Participants
Secondary Expansion Cohort: Adrenocortical CarcinomaDose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Immune Related Best Overall Response (irBOR) According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC)Immune-related Stable Disease40 Participants
Secondary Expansion Cohort: MelanomaDose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Immune Related Best Overall Response (irBOR) According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC)Not Evaluable2 Participants
Secondary Expansion Cohort: MelanomaDose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Immune Related Best Overall Response (irBOR) According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC)Immune-related Complete Response0 Participants
Secondary Expansion Cohort: MelanomaDose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Immune Related Best Overall Response (irBOR) According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC)Immune-related Progressive Disease1 Participants
Secondary Expansion Cohort: MelanomaDose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Immune Related Best Overall Response (irBOR) According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC)Immune-related Stable Disease15 Participants
Secondary Expansion Cohort: MelanomaDose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Immune Related Best Overall Response (irBOR) According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC)Immune-related Partial Response2 Participants
Secondary Expansion Cohort: MesotheliomaDose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Immune Related Best Overall Response (irBOR) According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC)Immune-related Progressive Disease33 Participants
Secondary Expansion Cohort: MesotheliomaDose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Immune Related Best Overall Response (irBOR) According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC)Immune-related Stable Disease44 Participants
Secondary Expansion Cohort: MesotheliomaDose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Immune Related Best Overall Response (irBOR) According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC)Immune-related Complete Response3 Participants
Secondary Expansion Cohort: MesotheliomaDose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Immune Related Best Overall Response (irBOR) According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC)Immune-related Partial Response4 Participants
Secondary Expansion Cohort: MesotheliomaDose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Immune Related Best Overall Response (irBOR) According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC)Not Evaluable19 Participants
Secondary Expansion Cohort: Urothelial CarcinomaDose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Immune Related Best Overall Response (irBOR) According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC)Immune-related Complete Response10 Participants
Secondary Expansion Cohort: Urothelial CarcinomaDose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Immune Related Best Overall Response (irBOR) According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC)Immune-related Progressive Disease62 Participants
Secondary Expansion Cohort: Urothelial CarcinomaDose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Immune Related Best Overall Response (irBOR) According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC)Immune-related Stable Disease61 Participants
Secondary Expansion Cohort: Urothelial CarcinomaDose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Immune Related Best Overall Response (irBOR) According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC)Not Evaluable41 Participants
Secondary Expansion Cohort: Urothelial CarcinomaDose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Immune Related Best Overall Response (irBOR) According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC)Immune-related Partial Response24 Participants
Secondary Expansion Cohort: Ovarian CancerDose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Immune Related Best Overall Response (irBOR) According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC)Immune-related Complete Response1 Participants
Secondary Expansion Cohort: Ovarian CancerDose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Immune Related Best Overall Response (irBOR) According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC)Immune-related Partial Response7 Participants
Secondary Expansion Cohort: Ovarian CancerDose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Immune Related Best Overall Response (irBOR) According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC)Not Evaluable33 Participants
Secondary Expansion Cohort: Ovarian CancerDose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Immune Related Best Overall Response (irBOR) According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC)Immune-related Progressive Disease62 Participants
Secondary Expansion Cohort: Ovarian CancerDose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Immune Related Best Overall Response (irBOR) According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC)Immune-related Stable Disease29 Participants
Secondary Expansion Cohort: Renal Cell Carcinoma (First Line)Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Immune Related Best Overall Response (irBOR) According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC)Not Evaluable27 Participants
Secondary Expansion Cohort: Renal Cell Carcinoma (First Line)Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Immune Related Best Overall Response (irBOR) According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC)Immune-related Progressive Disease44 Participants
Secondary Expansion Cohort: Renal Cell Carcinoma (First Line)Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Immune Related Best Overall Response (irBOR) According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC)Immune-related Complete Response6 Participants
Secondary Expansion Cohort: Renal Cell Carcinoma (First Line)Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Immune Related Best Overall Response (irBOR) According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC)Immune-related Partial Response15 Participants
Secondary Expansion Cohort: Renal Cell Carcinoma (First Line)Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Immune Related Best Overall Response (irBOR) According to Modified Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC)Immune-related Stable Disease61 Participants
Secondary

Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Positive Programmed Death Receptor-1 Ligand-1 (PD-L1) Biomarker Expression in Tumor Tissue

PD-L1 assessment was performed using immunohistochemistry. PD-L1 expression status was classified as positive or negative based on the following cut-offs: For tumor cells: Participants were considered PD-L1 expression positive (negative): - if at least (less than) 5% of the tumor cells show PD-L1 membrane staining \>= 1+, respectively. This was used as the primary cut-off; - if at least (less than) 25% of the tumor cells show PD-L1 membrane staining \>=2+, respectively. This was considered as secondary cut-off; - if at least (less than) 1% of the tumor cells show PD-L1 membrane staining \>=1+, respectively. This was used as the tertiary cut-off; - if at least (less than) 50% of the tumor cells show PD-L1 membrane staining \>=1+, respectively. This was used as the '50% cut-off'; - if at least (less than) 80% of the tumor cells show PD-L1 membrane staining ≥1+, respectively. This was used as the '80% cut-off'.

Time frame: Dose Expansion: Baseline up to Day 2023

Population: Safety analysis set included all participants who have received at least 1 dose of study treatment. Here number analyzed signifies those participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure at specified category.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 1.0 mg/kgDose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Positive Programmed Death Receptor-1 Ligand-1 (PD-L1) Biomarker Expression in Tumor TissuePD-L1 expression status - 50% cutoff54 Participants
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 1.0 mg/kgDose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Positive Programmed Death Receptor-1 Ligand-1 (PD-L1) Biomarker Expression in Tumor TissuePD-L1 expression status - 5% cutoff84 Participants
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 1.0 mg/kgDose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Positive Programmed Death Receptor-1 Ligand-1 (PD-L1) Biomarker Expression in Tumor TissuePD-L1 expression status - 25% cutoff53 Participants
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 1.0 mg/kgDose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Positive Programmed Death Receptor-1 Ligand-1 (PD-L1) Biomarker Expression in Tumor TissuePD-L1 expression status - 1% cutoff122 Participants
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 1.0 mg/kgDose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Positive Programmed Death Receptor-1 Ligand-1 (PD-L1) Biomarker Expression in Tumor TissuePD-L1 expression status - 80% cutoff41 Participants
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 3.0 mg/kgDose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Positive Programmed Death Receptor-1 Ligand-1 (PD-L1) Biomarker Expression in Tumor TissuePD-L1 expression status - 25% cutoff50 Participants
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 3.0 mg/kgDose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Positive Programmed Death Receptor-1 Ligand-1 (PD-L1) Biomarker Expression in Tumor TissuePD-L1 expression status - 5% cutoff76 Participants
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 3.0 mg/kgDose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Positive Programmed Death Receptor-1 Ligand-1 (PD-L1) Biomarker Expression in Tumor TissuePD-L1 expression status - 80% cutoff38 Participants
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 3.0 mg/kgDose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Positive Programmed Death Receptor-1 Ligand-1 (PD-L1) Biomarker Expression in Tumor TissuePD-L1 expression status - 50% cutoff53 Participants
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 3.0 mg/kgDose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Positive Programmed Death Receptor-1 Ligand-1 (PD-L1) Biomarker Expression in Tumor TissuePD-L1 expression status - 1% cutoff88 Participants
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 10.0 mg/kgDose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Positive Programmed Death Receptor-1 Ligand-1 (PD-L1) Biomarker Expression in Tumor TissuePD-L1 expression status - 50% cutoff13 Participants
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 10.0 mg/kgDose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Positive Programmed Death Receptor-1 Ligand-1 (PD-L1) Biomarker Expression in Tumor TissuePD-L1 expression status - 25% cutoff3 Participants
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 10.0 mg/kgDose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Positive Programmed Death Receptor-1 Ligand-1 (PD-L1) Biomarker Expression in Tumor TissuePD-L1 expression status - 5% cutoff25 Participants
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 10.0 mg/kgDose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Positive Programmed Death Receptor-1 Ligand-1 (PD-L1) Biomarker Expression in Tumor TissuePD-L1 expression status - 1% cutoff87 Participants
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 20.0 mg/kgDose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Positive Programmed Death Receptor-1 Ligand-1 (PD-L1) Biomarker Expression in Tumor TissuePD-L1 expression status - 1% cutoff20 Participants
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 10.0 mg/kg WeeklyDose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Positive Programmed Death Receptor-1 Ligand-1 (PD-L1) Biomarker Expression in Tumor TissuePD-L1 expression status - 1% cutoff26 Participants
Primary Expansion Cohort: NSCLC, Post-platinum DoubletDose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Positive Programmed Death Receptor-1 Ligand-1 (PD-L1) Biomarker Expression in Tumor TissuePD-L1 expression status - 50% cutoff1 Participants
Primary Expansion Cohort: NSCLC, Post-platinum DoubletDose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Positive Programmed Death Receptor-1 Ligand-1 (PD-L1) Biomarker Expression in Tumor TissuePD-L1 expression status - 1% cutoff5 Participants
Primary Expansion Cohort: NSCLC, Post-platinum DoubletDose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Positive Programmed Death Receptor-1 Ligand-1 (PD-L1) Biomarker Expression in Tumor TissuePD-L1 expression status - 25% cutoff0 Participants
Primary Expansion Cohort: NSCLC, Post-platinum DoubletDose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Positive Programmed Death Receptor-1 Ligand-1 (PD-L1) Biomarker Expression in Tumor TissuePD-L1 expression status - 5% cutoff1 Participants
Primary Expansion Cohort: NSCLC, First LineDose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Positive Programmed Death Receptor-1 Ligand-1 (PD-L1) Biomarker Expression in Tumor TissuePD-L1 expression status - 5% cutoff0 Participants
Primary Expansion Cohort: NSCLC, First LineDose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Positive Programmed Death Receptor-1 Ligand-1 (PD-L1) Biomarker Expression in Tumor TissuePD-L1 expression status - 1% cutoff0 Participants
Primary Expansion Cohort: NSCLC, First LineDose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Positive Programmed Death Receptor-1 Ligand-1 (PD-L1) Biomarker Expression in Tumor TissuePD-L1 expression status - 25% cutoff0 Participants
Primary Expansion Cohort: NSCLC, First LineDose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Positive Programmed Death Receptor-1 Ligand-1 (PD-L1) Biomarker Expression in Tumor TissuePD-L1 expression status - 50% cutoff0 Participants
Primary Expansion Cohort: NSCLC, First LineDose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Positive Programmed Death Receptor-1 Ligand-1 (PD-L1) Biomarker Expression in Tumor TissuePD-L1 expression status - 80% cutoff0 Participants
Primary Expansion Cohort: Metastatic Breast CancerDose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Positive Programmed Death Receptor-1 Ligand-1 (PD-L1) Biomarker Expression in Tumor TissuePD-L1 expression status - 50% cutoff5 Participants
Primary Expansion Cohort: Metastatic Breast CancerDose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Positive Programmed Death Receptor-1 Ligand-1 (PD-L1) Biomarker Expression in Tumor TissuePD-L1 expression status - 5% cutoff12 Participants
Primary Expansion Cohort: Metastatic Breast CancerDose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Positive Programmed Death Receptor-1 Ligand-1 (PD-L1) Biomarker Expression in Tumor TissuePD-L1 expression status - 1% cutoff15 Participants
Primary Expansion Cohort: Metastatic Breast CancerDose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Positive Programmed Death Receptor-1 Ligand-1 (PD-L1) Biomarker Expression in Tumor TissuePD-L1 expression status - 25% cutoff3 Participants
Primary Expansion Cohort: Metastatic Breast CancerDose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Positive Programmed Death Receptor-1 Ligand-1 (PD-L1) Biomarker Expression in Tumor TissuePD-L1 expression status - 80% cutoff2 Participants
Primary Expansion Cohort: GC/GEJC ProgressedDose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Positive Programmed Death Receptor-1 Ligand-1 (PD-L1) Biomarker Expression in Tumor TissuePD-L1 expression status - 1% cutoff19 Participants
Primary Expansion Cohort: GC/GEJC ProgressedDose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Positive Programmed Death Receptor-1 Ligand-1 (PD-L1) Biomarker Expression in Tumor TissuePD-L1 expression status - 25% cutoff7 Participants
Primary Expansion Cohort: GC/GEJC ProgressedDose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Positive Programmed Death Receptor-1 Ligand-1 (PD-L1) Biomarker Expression in Tumor TissuePD-L1 expression status - 50% cutoff8 Participants
Primary Expansion Cohort: GC/GEJC ProgressedDose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Positive Programmed Death Receptor-1 Ligand-1 (PD-L1) Biomarker Expression in Tumor TissuePD-L1 expression status - 80% cutoff2 Participants
Primary Expansion Cohort: GC/GEJC ProgressedDose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Positive Programmed Death Receptor-1 Ligand-1 (PD-L1) Biomarker Expression in Tumor TissuePD-L1 expression status - 5% cutoff15 Participants
Primary Expansion Cohort: GC/GEJC Non ProgressedDose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Positive Programmed Death Receptor-1 Ligand-1 (PD-L1) Biomarker Expression in Tumor TissuePD-L1 expression status - 80% cutoff2 Participants
Primary Expansion Cohort: GC/GEJC Non ProgressedDose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Positive Programmed Death Receptor-1 Ligand-1 (PD-L1) Biomarker Expression in Tumor TissuePD-L1 expression status - 50% cutoff5 Participants
Primary Expansion Cohort: GC/GEJC Non ProgressedDose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Positive Programmed Death Receptor-1 Ligand-1 (PD-L1) Biomarker Expression in Tumor TissuePD-L1 expression status - 25% cutoff8 Participants
Primary Expansion Cohort: GC/GEJC Non ProgressedDose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Positive Programmed Death Receptor-1 Ligand-1 (PD-L1) Biomarker Expression in Tumor TissuePD-L1 expression status - 5% cutoff16 Participants
Primary Expansion Cohort: GC/GEJC Non ProgressedDose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Positive Programmed Death Receptor-1 Ligand-1 (PD-L1) Biomarker Expression in Tumor TissuePD-L1 expression status - 1% cutoff22 Participants
Secondary Expansion Cohort: Colorectal CancerDose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Positive Programmed Death Receptor-1 Ligand-1 (PD-L1) Biomarker Expression in Tumor TissuePD-L1 expression status - 80% cutoff3 Participants
Secondary Expansion Cohort: Colorectal CancerDose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Positive Programmed Death Receptor-1 Ligand-1 (PD-L1) Biomarker Expression in Tumor TissuePD-L1 expression status - 50% cutoff5 Participants
Secondary Expansion Cohort: Colorectal CancerDose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Positive Programmed Death Receptor-1 Ligand-1 (PD-L1) Biomarker Expression in Tumor TissuePD-L1 expression status - 25% cutoff5 Participants
Secondary Expansion Cohort: Colorectal CancerDose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Positive Programmed Death Receptor-1 Ligand-1 (PD-L1) Biomarker Expression in Tumor TissuePD-L1 expression status - 1% cutoff14 Participants
Secondary Expansion Cohort: Colorectal CancerDose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Positive Programmed Death Receptor-1 Ligand-1 (PD-L1) Biomarker Expression in Tumor TissuePD-L1 expression status - 5% cutoff13 Participants
Secondary Expansion Cohort: Castrate-resistant Prostate CancerDose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Positive Programmed Death Receptor-1 Ligand-1 (PD-L1) Biomarker Expression in Tumor TissuePD-L1 expression status - 1% cutoff76 Participants
Secondary Expansion Cohort: Castrate-resistant Prostate CancerDose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Positive Programmed Death Receptor-1 Ligand-1 (PD-L1) Biomarker Expression in Tumor TissuePD-L1 expression status - 80% cutoff2 Participants
Secondary Expansion Cohort: Castrate-resistant Prostate CancerDose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Positive Programmed Death Receptor-1 Ligand-1 (PD-L1) Biomarker Expression in Tumor TissuePD-L1 expression status - 5% cutoff32 Participants
Secondary Expansion Cohort: Castrate-resistant Prostate CancerDose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Positive Programmed Death Receptor-1 Ligand-1 (PD-L1) Biomarker Expression in Tumor TissuePD-L1 expression status - 25% cutoff3 Participants
Secondary Expansion Cohort: Castrate-resistant Prostate CancerDose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Positive Programmed Death Receptor-1 Ligand-1 (PD-L1) Biomarker Expression in Tumor TissuePD-L1 expression status - 50% cutoff2 Participants
Secondary Expansion Cohort: Adrenocortical CarcinomaDose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Positive Programmed Death Receptor-1 Ligand-1 (PD-L1) Biomarker Expression in Tumor TissuePD-L1 expression status - 50% cutoff1 Participants
Secondary Expansion Cohort: Adrenocortical CarcinomaDose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Positive Programmed Death Receptor-1 Ligand-1 (PD-L1) Biomarker Expression in Tumor TissuePD-L1 expression status - 1% cutoff20 Participants
Secondary Expansion Cohort: Adrenocortical CarcinomaDose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Positive Programmed Death Receptor-1 Ligand-1 (PD-L1) Biomarker Expression in Tumor TissuePD-L1 expression status - 25% cutoff2 Participants
Secondary Expansion Cohort: Adrenocortical CarcinomaDose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Positive Programmed Death Receptor-1 Ligand-1 (PD-L1) Biomarker Expression in Tumor TissuePD-L1 expression status - 5% cutoff11 Participants
Secondary Expansion Cohort: Adrenocortical CarcinomaDose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Positive Programmed Death Receptor-1 Ligand-1 (PD-L1) Biomarker Expression in Tumor TissuePD-L1 expression status - 80% cutoff0 Participants
Secondary Expansion Cohort: MelanomaDose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Positive Programmed Death Receptor-1 Ligand-1 (PD-L1) Biomarker Expression in Tumor TissuePD-L1 expression status - 50% cutoff0 Participants
Secondary Expansion Cohort: MelanomaDose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Positive Programmed Death Receptor-1 Ligand-1 (PD-L1) Biomarker Expression in Tumor TissuePD-L1 expression status - 5% cutoff1 Participants
Secondary Expansion Cohort: MelanomaDose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Positive Programmed Death Receptor-1 Ligand-1 (PD-L1) Biomarker Expression in Tumor TissuePD-L1 expression status - 80% cutoff0 Participants
Secondary Expansion Cohort: MelanomaDose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Positive Programmed Death Receptor-1 Ligand-1 (PD-L1) Biomarker Expression in Tumor TissuePD-L1 expression status - 25% cutoff0 Participants
Secondary Expansion Cohort: MelanomaDose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Positive Programmed Death Receptor-1 Ligand-1 (PD-L1) Biomarker Expression in Tumor TissuePD-L1 expression status - 1% cutoff4 Participants
Secondary Expansion Cohort: MesotheliomaDose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Positive Programmed Death Receptor-1 Ligand-1 (PD-L1) Biomarker Expression in Tumor TissuePD-L1 expression status - 25% cutoff6 Participants
Secondary Expansion Cohort: MesotheliomaDose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Positive Programmed Death Receptor-1 Ligand-1 (PD-L1) Biomarker Expression in Tumor TissuePD-L1 expression status - 80% cutoff0 Participants
Secondary Expansion Cohort: MesotheliomaDose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Positive Programmed Death Receptor-1 Ligand-1 (PD-L1) Biomarker Expression in Tumor TissuePD-L1 expression status - 1% cutoff45 Participants
Secondary Expansion Cohort: MesotheliomaDose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Positive Programmed Death Receptor-1 Ligand-1 (PD-L1) Biomarker Expression in Tumor TissuePD-L1 expression status - 50% cutoff4 Participants
Secondary Expansion Cohort: MesotheliomaDose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Positive Programmed Death Receptor-1 Ligand-1 (PD-L1) Biomarker Expression in Tumor TissuePD-L1 expression status - 5% cutoff23 Participants
Secondary Expansion Cohort: Urothelial CarcinomaDose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Positive Programmed Death Receptor-1 Ligand-1 (PD-L1) Biomarker Expression in Tumor TissuePD-L1 expression status - 25% cutoff25 Participants
Secondary Expansion Cohort: Urothelial CarcinomaDose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Positive Programmed Death Receptor-1 Ligand-1 (PD-L1) Biomarker Expression in Tumor TissuePD-L1 expression status - 80% cutoff25 Participants
Secondary Expansion Cohort: Urothelial CarcinomaDose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Positive Programmed Death Receptor-1 Ligand-1 (PD-L1) Biomarker Expression in Tumor TissuePD-L1 expression status - 5% cutoff72 Participants
Secondary Expansion Cohort: Urothelial CarcinomaDose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Positive Programmed Death Receptor-1 Ligand-1 (PD-L1) Biomarker Expression in Tumor TissuePD-L1 expression status - 1% cutoff87 Participants
Secondary Expansion Cohort: Urothelial CarcinomaDose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Positive Programmed Death Receptor-1 Ligand-1 (PD-L1) Biomarker Expression in Tumor TissuePD-L1 expression status - 50% cutoff34 Participants
Secondary Expansion Cohort: Ovarian CancerDose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Positive Programmed Death Receptor-1 Ligand-1 (PD-L1) Biomarker Expression in Tumor TissuePD-L1 expression status - 25% cutoff6 Participants
Secondary Expansion Cohort: Ovarian CancerDose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Positive Programmed Death Receptor-1 Ligand-1 (PD-L1) Biomarker Expression in Tumor TissuePD-L1 expression status - 5% cutoff16 Participants
Secondary Expansion Cohort: Ovarian CancerDose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Positive Programmed Death Receptor-1 Ligand-1 (PD-L1) Biomarker Expression in Tumor TissuePD-L1 expression status - 1% cutoff39 Participants
Secondary Expansion Cohort: Renal Cell Carcinoma (First Line)Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Positive Programmed Death Receptor-1 Ligand-1 (PD-L1) Biomarker Expression in Tumor TissuePD-L1 expression status - 25% cutoff48 Participants
Secondary Expansion Cohort: Renal Cell Carcinoma (First Line)Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Positive Programmed Death Receptor-1 Ligand-1 (PD-L1) Biomarker Expression in Tumor TissuePD-L1 expression status - 1% cutoff107 Participants
Secondary Expansion Cohort: Renal Cell Carcinoma (First Line)Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Positive Programmed Death Receptor-1 Ligand-1 (PD-L1) Biomarker Expression in Tumor TissuePD-L1 expression status - 80% cutoff28 Participants
Secondary Expansion Cohort: Renal Cell Carcinoma (First Line)Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Positive Programmed Death Receptor-1 Ligand-1 (PD-L1) Biomarker Expression in Tumor TissuePD-L1 expression status - 50% cutoff51 Participants
Secondary Expansion Cohort: Renal Cell Carcinoma (First Line)Dose Expansion Cohort: Number of Participants With Positive Programmed Death Receptor-1 Ligand-1 (PD-L1) Biomarker Expression in Tumor TissuePD-L1 expression status - 5% cutoff93 Participants
Secondary

Dose Expansion Cohort: Overall Survival (OS) Time

Overall survival time was measured as time in months first administration of trial treatment to death. The analysis of OS time was performed with a Kaplan-Meier method.

Time frame: Dose Expansion: Baseline up to Day 2023

Population: FAS included all participants who have received at least 1 dose of study treatment. Here Overall Number of Participants Analyzed signifies those participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 1.0 mg/kgDose Expansion Cohort: Overall Survival (OS) Time8.57 Months
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 3.0 mg/kgDose Expansion Cohort: Overall Survival (OS) Time14.23 Months
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 10.0 mg/kgDose Expansion Cohort: Overall Survival (OS) Time8.38 Months
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 20.0 mg/kgDose Expansion Cohort: Overall Survival (OS) Time6.64 Months
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 10.0 mg/kg WeeklyDose Expansion Cohort: Overall Survival (OS) Time11.07 Months
Primary Expansion Cohort: NSCLC, Post-platinum DoubletDose Expansion Cohort: Overall Survival (OS) Time11.20 Months
Primary Expansion Cohort: NSCLC, First LineDose Expansion Cohort: Overall Survival (OS) Time19.32 Months
Primary Expansion Cohort: Metastatic Breast CancerDose Expansion Cohort: Overall Survival (OS) Time10.55 Months
Primary Expansion Cohort: GC/GEJC ProgressedDose Expansion Cohort: Overall Survival (OS) Time17.22 Months
Primary Expansion Cohort: GC/GEJC Non ProgressedDose Expansion Cohort: Overall Survival (OS) Time10.71 Months
Secondary Expansion Cohort: Colorectal CancerDose Expansion Cohort: Overall Survival (OS) Time13.70 Months
Secondary Expansion Cohort: Castrate-resistant Prostate CancerDose Expansion Cohort: Overall Survival (OS) Time11.17 Months
Secondary Expansion Cohort: Adrenocortical CarcinomaDose Expansion Cohort: Overall Survival (OS) TimeNA Months
Secondary Expansion Cohort: MelanomaDose Expansion Cohort: Overall Survival (OS) Time16.85 Months
Secondary Expansion Cohort: MesotheliomaDose Expansion Cohort: Overall Survival (OS) Time9.13 Months
Secondary Expansion Cohort: Urothelial CarcinomaDose Expansion Cohort: Overall Survival (OS) Time6.97 Months
Secondary Expansion Cohort: Ovarian CancerDose Expansion Cohort: Overall Survival (OS) Time3.35 Months
Secondary Expansion Cohort: Renal Cell Carcinoma (First Line)Dose Expansion Cohort: Overall Survival (OS) Time7.98 Months
Secondary

Dose Expansion Cohort: Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Time According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version (RECIST) 1.1

The PFS time (based on investigator assessments), according to the RECIST 1.1, was defined as the time from first administration of study treatment until first documentation of progressive disease (PD) or death when death occurred within 12 weeks of the last tumor assessment or first administration of study treatment (whichever was later). PD was defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of longest diameter (SLD), taking as reference the smallest SLD recorded from baseline or the appearance of 1 or more new lesions and unequivocal progression of non-target lesions. The analysis of PFS was performed with a Kaplan-Meier method.

Time frame: Dose Expansion: Baseline up to Day 2023

Population: FAS included all participants who have received at least 1 dose of study treatment. Here Overall Number of Participants Analyzed signifies those participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 1.0 mg/kgDose Expansion Cohort: Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Time According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version (RECIST) 1.12.66 Months
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 3.0 mg/kgDose Expansion Cohort: Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Time According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version (RECIST) 1.14.04 Months
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 10.0 mg/kgDose Expansion Cohort: Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Time According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version (RECIST) 1.11.35 Months
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 20.0 mg/kgDose Expansion Cohort: Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Time According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version (RECIST) 1.11.38 Months
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 10.0 mg/kg WeeklyDose Expansion Cohort: Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Time According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version (RECIST) 1.12.76 Months
Primary Expansion Cohort: NSCLC, Post-platinum DoubletDose Expansion Cohort: Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Time According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version (RECIST) 1.11.41 Months
Primary Expansion Cohort: NSCLC, First LineDose Expansion Cohort: Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Time According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version (RECIST) 1.15.39 Months
Primary Expansion Cohort: Metastatic Breast CancerDose Expansion Cohort: Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Time According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version (RECIST) 1.12.56 Months
Primary Expansion Cohort: GC/GEJC ProgressedDose Expansion Cohort: Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Time According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version (RECIST) 1.13.06 Months
Primary Expansion Cohort: GC/GEJC Non ProgressedDose Expansion Cohort: Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Time According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version (RECIST) 1.14.11 Months
Secondary Expansion Cohort: Colorectal CancerDose Expansion Cohort: Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Time According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version (RECIST) 1.12.69 Months
Secondary Expansion Cohort: Castrate-resistant Prostate CancerDose Expansion Cohort: Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Time According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version (RECIST) 1.12.60 Months
Secondary Expansion Cohort: Adrenocortical CarcinomaDose Expansion Cohort: Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Time According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version (RECIST) 1.18.28 Months
Secondary Expansion Cohort: MelanomaDose Expansion Cohort: Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Time According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version (RECIST) 1.15.55 Months
Secondary Expansion Cohort: MesotheliomaDose Expansion Cohort: Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Time According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version (RECIST) 1.11.45 Months
Secondary Expansion Cohort: Urothelial CarcinomaDose Expansion Cohort: Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Time According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version (RECIST) 1.11.41 Months
Secondary Expansion Cohort: Ovarian CancerDose Expansion Cohort: Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Time According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version (RECIST) 1.11.31 Months
Secondary Expansion Cohort: Renal Cell Carcinoma (First Line)Dose Expansion Cohort: Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Time According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version (RECIST) 1.11.77 Months
Secondary

Dose Expansion Cohort (Secondary Urothelial Carcinoma Cohort): Number of Participants With Confirmed Best Overall Response According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 as Adjudicated by an Independent Endpoint Review Committee

Confirmed Best Overall Response (BOR) was determined according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) v1.1and as adjudicated by an Independent Endpoint Review Committee (IERC) is defined as best response of any of complete response (CR), partial response (PR), stable disease (SD) and progressive disease (PD) recorded from date of randomization until disease progression/recurrence (taking smallest measurement recorded since start of treatment as reference). CR: Disappearance of all evidence of target/non-target lesions. PR: At least 30% reduction from baseline in sum of longest diameter (SLD) of all lesions. SD: Neither sufficient increase to qualify for PD nor sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR. PD: at least a 20% increase in SLD, taking as reference smallest SLD recorded from baseline/appearance of 1or more new lesions and unequivocal progression of non-target lesions. Number of participants with BOR in each category (CR, PR, SD, PD) were reported.

Time frame: Secondary Urothelial Carcinoma Dose Expansion: Baseline up to Day 931

Population: FAS included all participants who have received at least 1 dose of study treatment. This outcome measure was planned to be analyzed in Secondary Urothelial Carcinoma Cohort only.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 1.0 mg/kgDose Expansion Cohort (Secondary Urothelial Carcinoma Cohort): Number of Participants With Confirmed Best Overall Response According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 as Adjudicated by an Independent Endpoint Review CommitteePartial Response1 Participants
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 1.0 mg/kgDose Expansion Cohort (Secondary Urothelial Carcinoma Cohort): Number of Participants With Confirmed Best Overall Response According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 as Adjudicated by an Independent Endpoint Review CommitteeNot Evaluable5 Participants
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 1.0 mg/kgDose Expansion Cohort (Secondary Urothelial Carcinoma Cohort): Number of Participants With Confirmed Best Overall Response According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 as Adjudicated by an Independent Endpoint Review CommitteeComplete Response6 Participants
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 1.0 mg/kgDose Expansion Cohort (Secondary Urothelial Carcinoma Cohort): Number of Participants With Confirmed Best Overall Response According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 as Adjudicated by an Independent Endpoint Review CommitteeStable Disease16 Participants
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 1.0 mg/kgDose Expansion Cohort (Secondary Urothelial Carcinoma Cohort): Number of Participants With Confirmed Best Overall Response According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 as Adjudicated by an Independent Endpoint Review CommitteeNon-CR/Non-PD0 Participants
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 1.0 mg/kgDose Expansion Cohort (Secondary Urothelial Carcinoma Cohort): Number of Participants With Confirmed Best Overall Response According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 as Adjudicated by an Independent Endpoint Review CommitteeProgressive Disease16 Participants
Secondary

Dose Expansion Phase: Minimum Serum Post-dose (Ctrough) Concentration of Avelumab

Serum Ctrough concentration of Avelumab is reported.

Time frame: At Day 15, 29, 43, 57, 71, 85, 99, 127 and 169

Population: Pharmacokinetic analysis set was used. Here Overall number of participants analyzed signifies those who were evaluable for this outcome measure and Number analyzed signifies those who were evaluable at specified time points. Data for primary expansion cohort: GC/GEJC Progressed and primary expansion cohort: GC/GEJC Non progressed arms was reported as a single arm primary expansion cohort: GC/GEJC Progressed/Non progressed for this outcome measure as per planned analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 1.0 mg/kgDose Expansion Phase: Minimum Serum Post-dose (Ctrough) Concentration of AvelumabDay 1520.4 Microgram per milliliterStandard Deviation 16.1
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 1.0 mg/kgDose Expansion Phase: Minimum Serum Post-dose (Ctrough) Concentration of AvelumabDay 16936.6 Microgram per milliliterStandard Deviation 25.8
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 1.0 mg/kgDose Expansion Phase: Minimum Serum Post-dose (Ctrough) Concentration of AvelumabDay 8527.8 Microgram per milliliterStandard Deviation 18.9
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 1.0 mg/kgDose Expansion Phase: Minimum Serum Post-dose (Ctrough) Concentration of AvelumabDay 7127.9 Microgram per milliliterStandard Deviation 36.5
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 1.0 mg/kgDose Expansion Phase: Minimum Serum Post-dose (Ctrough) Concentration of AvelumabDay 4324.6 Microgram per milliliterStandard Deviation 15.6
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 1.0 mg/kgDose Expansion Phase: Minimum Serum Post-dose (Ctrough) Concentration of AvelumabDay 5726.2 Microgram per milliliterStandard Deviation 17.3
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 1.0 mg/kgDose Expansion Phase: Minimum Serum Post-dose (Ctrough) Concentration of AvelumabDay 12736.9 Microgram per milliliterStandard Deviation 24
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 1.0 mg/kgDose Expansion Phase: Minimum Serum Post-dose (Ctrough) Concentration of AvelumabDay 2923.5 Microgram per milliliterStandard Deviation 15.4
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 3.0 mg/kgDose Expansion Phase: Minimum Serum Post-dose (Ctrough) Concentration of AvelumabDay 7131.0 Microgram per milliliterStandard Deviation 40.1
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 3.0 mg/kgDose Expansion Phase: Minimum Serum Post-dose (Ctrough) Concentration of AvelumabDay 2923.5 Microgram per milliliterStandard Deviation 15.1
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 3.0 mg/kgDose Expansion Phase: Minimum Serum Post-dose (Ctrough) Concentration of AvelumabDay 9928.8 Microgram per milliliterStandard Deviation 13.6
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 3.0 mg/kgDose Expansion Phase: Minimum Serum Post-dose (Ctrough) Concentration of AvelumabDay 8527.7 Microgram per milliliterStandard Deviation 16.7
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 3.0 mg/kgDose Expansion Phase: Minimum Serum Post-dose (Ctrough) Concentration of AvelumabDay 1518.3 Microgram per milliliterStandard Deviation 10.3
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 3.0 mg/kgDose Expansion Phase: Minimum Serum Post-dose (Ctrough) Concentration of AvelumabDay 16939.1 Microgram per milliliterStandard Deviation 19.8
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 3.0 mg/kgDose Expansion Phase: Minimum Serum Post-dose (Ctrough) Concentration of AvelumabDay 5723.4 Microgram per milliliterStandard Deviation 16.1
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 3.0 mg/kgDose Expansion Phase: Minimum Serum Post-dose (Ctrough) Concentration of AvelumabDay 4323.8 Microgram per milliliterStandard Deviation 15.9
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 10.0 mg/kgDose Expansion Phase: Minimum Serum Post-dose (Ctrough) Concentration of AvelumabDay 1522.5 Microgram per milliliterStandard Deviation 11.1
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 10.0 mg/kgDose Expansion Phase: Minimum Serum Post-dose (Ctrough) Concentration of AvelumabDay 4328.3 Microgram per milliliterStandard Deviation 18.2
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 10.0 mg/kgDose Expansion Phase: Minimum Serum Post-dose (Ctrough) Concentration of AvelumabDay 5726.5 Microgram per milliliterStandard Deviation 14.1
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 10.0 mg/kgDose Expansion Phase: Minimum Serum Post-dose (Ctrough) Concentration of AvelumabDay 12739.1 Microgram per milliliterStandard Deviation 40.2
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 10.0 mg/kgDose Expansion Phase: Minimum Serum Post-dose (Ctrough) Concentration of AvelumabDay 2925.6 Microgram per milliliterStandard Deviation 15.2
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 10.0 mg/kgDose Expansion Phase: Minimum Serum Post-dose (Ctrough) Concentration of AvelumabDay 7128.1 Microgram per milliliterStandard Deviation 16.6
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 10.0 mg/kgDose Expansion Phase: Minimum Serum Post-dose (Ctrough) Concentration of AvelumabDay 8529.7 Microgram per milliliterStandard Deviation 18.1
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 10.0 mg/kgDose Expansion Phase: Minimum Serum Post-dose (Ctrough) Concentration of AvelumabDay 16931.4 Microgram per milliliterStandard Deviation 18.2
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 20.0 mg/kgDose Expansion Phase: Minimum Serum Post-dose (Ctrough) Concentration of AvelumabDay 2926.5 Microgram per milliliterStandard Deviation 17
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 20.0 mg/kgDose Expansion Phase: Minimum Serum Post-dose (Ctrough) Concentration of AvelumabDay 5728.9 Microgram per milliliterStandard Deviation 14.5
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 20.0 mg/kgDose Expansion Phase: Minimum Serum Post-dose (Ctrough) Concentration of AvelumabDay 1523.7 Microgram per milliliterStandard Deviation 24.6
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 20.0 mg/kgDose Expansion Phase: Minimum Serum Post-dose (Ctrough) Concentration of AvelumabDay 4329.7 Microgram per milliliterStandard Deviation 17.8
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 20.0 mg/kgDose Expansion Phase: Minimum Serum Post-dose (Ctrough) Concentration of AvelumabDay 7129.9 Microgram per milliliterStandard Deviation 15.4
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 20.0 mg/kgDose Expansion Phase: Minimum Serum Post-dose (Ctrough) Concentration of AvelumabDay 8528.9 Microgram per milliliterStandard Deviation 16.8
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 20.0 mg/kgDose Expansion Phase: Minimum Serum Post-dose (Ctrough) Concentration of AvelumabDay 12733.1 Microgram per milliliterStandard Deviation 24
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 20.0 mg/kgDose Expansion Phase: Minimum Serum Post-dose (Ctrough) Concentration of AvelumabDay 16931.9 Microgram per milliliterStandard Deviation 14
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 10.0 mg/kg WeeklyDose Expansion Phase: Minimum Serum Post-dose (Ctrough) Concentration of AvelumabDay 1517.8 Microgram per milliliterStandard Deviation 9.51
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 10.0 mg/kg WeeklyDose Expansion Phase: Minimum Serum Post-dose (Ctrough) Concentration of AvelumabDay 12728.8 Microgram per milliliterStandard Deviation 22.1
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 10.0 mg/kg WeeklyDose Expansion Phase: Minimum Serum Post-dose (Ctrough) Concentration of AvelumabDay 7122.0 Microgram per milliliterStandard Deviation 15.5
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 10.0 mg/kg WeeklyDose Expansion Phase: Minimum Serum Post-dose (Ctrough) Concentration of AvelumabDay 4320.6 Microgram per milliliterStandard Deviation 14.3
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 10.0 mg/kg WeeklyDose Expansion Phase: Minimum Serum Post-dose (Ctrough) Concentration of AvelumabDay 16924.7 Microgram per milliliterStandard Deviation 28.1
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 10.0 mg/kg WeeklyDose Expansion Phase: Minimum Serum Post-dose (Ctrough) Concentration of AvelumabDay 5722.2 Microgram per milliliterStandard Deviation 19.8
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 10.0 mg/kg WeeklyDose Expansion Phase: Minimum Serum Post-dose (Ctrough) Concentration of AvelumabDay 2917.3 Microgram per milliliterStandard Deviation 13.6
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 10.0 mg/kg WeeklyDose Expansion Phase: Minimum Serum Post-dose (Ctrough) Concentration of AvelumabDay 8524.9 Microgram per milliliterStandard Deviation 29
Primary Expansion Cohort: NSCLC, Post-platinum DoubletDose Expansion Phase: Minimum Serum Post-dose (Ctrough) Concentration of AvelumabDay 858.03 Microgram per milliliterStandard Deviation 0.988
Primary Expansion Cohort: NSCLC, Post-platinum DoubletDose Expansion Phase: Minimum Serum Post-dose (Ctrough) Concentration of AvelumabDay 12734.2 Microgram per milliliter
Primary Expansion Cohort: NSCLC, Post-platinum DoubletDose Expansion Phase: Minimum Serum Post-dose (Ctrough) Concentration of AvelumabDay 2925.5 Microgram per milliliterStandard Deviation 20.1
Primary Expansion Cohort: NSCLC, Post-platinum DoubletDose Expansion Phase: Minimum Serum Post-dose (Ctrough) Concentration of AvelumabDay 1522.4 Microgram per milliliterStandard Deviation 14.1
Primary Expansion Cohort: NSCLC, Post-platinum DoubletDose Expansion Phase: Minimum Serum Post-dose (Ctrough) Concentration of AvelumabDay 16910.5 Microgram per milliliter
Primary Expansion Cohort: NSCLC, Post-platinum DoubletDose Expansion Phase: Minimum Serum Post-dose (Ctrough) Concentration of AvelumabDay 4323.2 Microgram per milliliterStandard Deviation 24.2
Primary Expansion Cohort: NSCLC, First LineDose Expansion Phase: Minimum Serum Post-dose (Ctrough) Concentration of AvelumabDay 8537.9 Microgram per milliliterStandard Deviation 18.3
Primary Expansion Cohort: NSCLC, First LineDose Expansion Phase: Minimum Serum Post-dose (Ctrough) Concentration of AvelumabDay 12744.2 Microgram per milliliterStandard Deviation 12.7
Primary Expansion Cohort: NSCLC, First LineDose Expansion Phase: Minimum Serum Post-dose (Ctrough) Concentration of AvelumabDay 2931.6 Microgram per milliliterStandard Deviation 15.9
Primary Expansion Cohort: NSCLC, First LineDose Expansion Phase: Minimum Serum Post-dose (Ctrough) Concentration of AvelumabDay 4332.3 Microgram per milliliterStandard Deviation 16.3
Primary Expansion Cohort: NSCLC, First LineDose Expansion Phase: Minimum Serum Post-dose (Ctrough) Concentration of AvelumabDay 1528.8 Microgram per milliliterStandard Deviation 14.5
Primary Expansion Cohort: Metastatic Breast CancerDose Expansion Phase: Minimum Serum Post-dose (Ctrough) Concentration of AvelumabDay 8535.6 Microgram per milliliterStandard Deviation 23.7
Primary Expansion Cohort: Metastatic Breast CancerDose Expansion Phase: Minimum Serum Post-dose (Ctrough) Concentration of AvelumabDay 7128.8 Microgram per milliliterStandard Deviation 23.6
Primary Expansion Cohort: Metastatic Breast CancerDose Expansion Phase: Minimum Serum Post-dose (Ctrough) Concentration of AvelumabDay 16935.3 Microgram per milliliterStandard Deviation 20.2
Primary Expansion Cohort: Metastatic Breast CancerDose Expansion Phase: Minimum Serum Post-dose (Ctrough) Concentration of AvelumabDay 1522.3 Microgram per milliliterStandard Deviation 13.4
Primary Expansion Cohort: Metastatic Breast CancerDose Expansion Phase: Minimum Serum Post-dose (Ctrough) Concentration of AvelumabDay 4329.3 Microgram per milliliterStandard Deviation 22.9
Primary Expansion Cohort: Metastatic Breast CancerDose Expansion Phase: Minimum Serum Post-dose (Ctrough) Concentration of AvelumabDay 12758.6 Microgram per milliliterStandard Deviation 76.7
Primary Expansion Cohort: Metastatic Breast CancerDose Expansion Phase: Minimum Serum Post-dose (Ctrough) Concentration of AvelumabDay 5729.9 Microgram per milliliterStandard Deviation 22.4
Primary Expansion Cohort: Metastatic Breast CancerDose Expansion Phase: Minimum Serum Post-dose (Ctrough) Concentration of AvelumabDay 2923.8 Microgram per milliliterStandard Deviation 17.3
Primary Expansion Cohort: GC/GEJC ProgressedDose Expansion Phase: Minimum Serum Post-dose (Ctrough) Concentration of AvelumabDay 12725.9 Microgram per milliliterStandard Deviation 11.3
Primary Expansion Cohort: GC/GEJC ProgressedDose Expansion Phase: Minimum Serum Post-dose (Ctrough) Concentration of AvelumabDay 16928.7 Microgram per milliliterStandard Deviation 11.4
Primary Expansion Cohort: GC/GEJC ProgressedDose Expansion Phase: Minimum Serum Post-dose (Ctrough) Concentration of AvelumabDay 5718.2 Microgram per milliliterStandard Deviation 11.7
Primary Expansion Cohort: GC/GEJC ProgressedDose Expansion Phase: Minimum Serum Post-dose (Ctrough) Concentration of AvelumabDay 8523.7 Microgram per milliliterStandard Deviation 15.8
Primary Expansion Cohort: GC/GEJC ProgressedDose Expansion Phase: Minimum Serum Post-dose (Ctrough) Concentration of AvelumabDay 7121.0 Microgram per milliliterStandard Deviation 14.2
Primary Expansion Cohort: GC/GEJC ProgressedDose Expansion Phase: Minimum Serum Post-dose (Ctrough) Concentration of AvelumabDay 1521.7 Microgram per milliliterStandard Deviation 26.7
Primary Expansion Cohort: GC/GEJC ProgressedDose Expansion Phase: Minimum Serum Post-dose (Ctrough) Concentration of AvelumabDay 2920.7 Microgram per milliliterStandard Deviation 12.4
Primary Expansion Cohort: GC/GEJC ProgressedDose Expansion Phase: Minimum Serum Post-dose (Ctrough) Concentration of AvelumabDay 4323.6 Microgram per milliliterStandard Deviation 18.9
Primary Expansion Cohort: GC/GEJC Non ProgressedDose Expansion Phase: Minimum Serum Post-dose (Ctrough) Concentration of AvelumabDay 5739.8 Microgram per milliliterStandard Deviation 25.5
Primary Expansion Cohort: GC/GEJC Non ProgressedDose Expansion Phase: Minimum Serum Post-dose (Ctrough) Concentration of AvelumabDay 1526.9 Microgram per milliliterStandard Deviation 14.4
Primary Expansion Cohort: GC/GEJC Non ProgressedDose Expansion Phase: Minimum Serum Post-dose (Ctrough) Concentration of AvelumabDay 4335.7 Microgram per milliliterStandard Deviation 22.6
Primary Expansion Cohort: GC/GEJC Non ProgressedDose Expansion Phase: Minimum Serum Post-dose (Ctrough) Concentration of AvelumabDay 16947.1 Microgram per milliliterStandard Deviation 26.8
Primary Expansion Cohort: GC/GEJC Non ProgressedDose Expansion Phase: Minimum Serum Post-dose (Ctrough) Concentration of AvelumabDay 7138.4 Microgram per milliliterStandard Deviation 33.4
Primary Expansion Cohort: GC/GEJC Non ProgressedDose Expansion Phase: Minimum Serum Post-dose (Ctrough) Concentration of AvelumabDay 2935.7 Microgram per milliliterStandard Deviation 22.3
Primary Expansion Cohort: GC/GEJC Non ProgressedDose Expansion Phase: Minimum Serum Post-dose (Ctrough) Concentration of AvelumabDay 8539.7 Microgram per milliliterStandard Deviation 27.2
Secondary Expansion Cohort: Colorectal CancerDose Expansion Phase: Minimum Serum Post-dose (Ctrough) Concentration of AvelumabDay 4329.4 Microgram per milliliterStandard Deviation 19.7
Secondary Expansion Cohort: Colorectal CancerDose Expansion Phase: Minimum Serum Post-dose (Ctrough) Concentration of AvelumabDay 2927.4 Microgram per milliliterStandard Deviation 16.6
Secondary Expansion Cohort: Colorectal CancerDose Expansion Phase: Minimum Serum Post-dose (Ctrough) Concentration of AvelumabDay 5725.5 Microgram per milliliterStandard Deviation 18.7
Secondary Expansion Cohort: Colorectal CancerDose Expansion Phase: Minimum Serum Post-dose (Ctrough) Concentration of AvelumabDay 7127.8 Microgram per milliliterStandard Deviation 17.6
Secondary Expansion Cohort: Colorectal CancerDose Expansion Phase: Minimum Serum Post-dose (Ctrough) Concentration of AvelumabDay 8534.4 Microgram per milliliterStandard Deviation 20.2
Secondary Expansion Cohort: Colorectal CancerDose Expansion Phase: Minimum Serum Post-dose (Ctrough) Concentration of AvelumabDay 1525.1 Microgram per milliliterStandard Deviation 11.6
Secondary Expansion Cohort: Colorectal CancerDose Expansion Phase: Minimum Serum Post-dose (Ctrough) Concentration of AvelumabDay 16943.6 Microgram per milliliter
Secondary Expansion Cohort: Castrate-resistant Prostate CancerDose Expansion Phase: Minimum Serum Post-dose (Ctrough) Concentration of AvelumabDay 7129.4 Microgram per milliliterStandard Deviation 22.1
Secondary Expansion Cohort: Castrate-resistant Prostate CancerDose Expansion Phase: Minimum Serum Post-dose (Ctrough) Concentration of AvelumabDay 4328.1 Microgram per milliliterStandard Deviation 18.9
Secondary Expansion Cohort: Castrate-resistant Prostate CancerDose Expansion Phase: Minimum Serum Post-dose (Ctrough) Concentration of AvelumabDay 16938.8 Microgram per milliliterStandard Deviation 19.2
Secondary Expansion Cohort: Castrate-resistant Prostate CancerDose Expansion Phase: Minimum Serum Post-dose (Ctrough) Concentration of AvelumabDay 12735.7 Microgram per milliliterStandard Deviation 18.2
Secondary Expansion Cohort: Castrate-resistant Prostate CancerDose Expansion Phase: Minimum Serum Post-dose (Ctrough) Concentration of AvelumabDay 2926.2 Microgram per milliliterStandard Deviation 16.9
Secondary Expansion Cohort: Castrate-resistant Prostate CancerDose Expansion Phase: Minimum Serum Post-dose (Ctrough) Concentration of AvelumabDay 8534.7 Microgram per milliliterStandard Deviation 20.5
Secondary Expansion Cohort: Castrate-resistant Prostate CancerDose Expansion Phase: Minimum Serum Post-dose (Ctrough) Concentration of AvelumabDay 5729.7 Microgram per milliliterStandard Deviation 22.8
Secondary Expansion Cohort: Castrate-resistant Prostate CancerDose Expansion Phase: Minimum Serum Post-dose (Ctrough) Concentration of AvelumabDay 1521.3 Microgram per milliliterStandard Deviation 12
Secondary Expansion Cohort: Adrenocortical CarcinomaDose Expansion Phase: Minimum Serum Post-dose (Ctrough) Concentration of AvelumabDay 7133.4 Microgram per milliliterStandard Deviation 31.8
Secondary Expansion Cohort: Adrenocortical CarcinomaDose Expansion Phase: Minimum Serum Post-dose (Ctrough) Concentration of AvelumabDay 5727.3 Microgram per milliliterStandard Deviation 21.5
Secondary Expansion Cohort: Adrenocortical CarcinomaDose Expansion Phase: Minimum Serum Post-dose (Ctrough) Concentration of AvelumabDay 2927.7 Microgram per milliliterStandard Deviation 18.3
Secondary Expansion Cohort: Adrenocortical CarcinomaDose Expansion Phase: Minimum Serum Post-dose (Ctrough) Concentration of AvelumabDay 8539.1 Microgram per milliliterStandard Deviation 28.3
Secondary Expansion Cohort: Adrenocortical CarcinomaDose Expansion Phase: Minimum Serum Post-dose (Ctrough) Concentration of AvelumabDay 16949.3 Microgram per milliliterStandard Deviation 27.3
Secondary Expansion Cohort: Adrenocortical CarcinomaDose Expansion Phase: Minimum Serum Post-dose (Ctrough) Concentration of AvelumabDay 4328.4 Microgram per milliliterStandard Deviation 20.9
Secondary Expansion Cohort: Adrenocortical CarcinomaDose Expansion Phase: Minimum Serum Post-dose (Ctrough) Concentration of AvelumabDay 12740.7 Microgram per milliliterStandard Deviation 25.1
Secondary Expansion Cohort: Adrenocortical CarcinomaDose Expansion Phase: Minimum Serum Post-dose (Ctrough) Concentration of AvelumabDay 1523.1 Microgram per milliliterStandard Deviation 14.1
Secondary Expansion Cohort: MelanomaDose Expansion Phase: Minimum Serum Post-dose (Ctrough) Concentration of AvelumabDay 7119.6 Microgram per milliliterStandard Deviation 15.3
Secondary Expansion Cohort: MelanomaDose Expansion Phase: Minimum Serum Post-dose (Ctrough) Concentration of AvelumabDay 2918.6 Microgram per milliliterStandard Deviation 16
Secondary Expansion Cohort: MelanomaDose Expansion Phase: Minimum Serum Post-dose (Ctrough) Concentration of AvelumabDay 1518.1 Microgram per milliliterStandard Deviation 12.4
Secondary Expansion Cohort: MelanomaDose Expansion Phase: Minimum Serum Post-dose (Ctrough) Concentration of AvelumabDay 8519.3 Microgram per milliliterStandard Deviation 3.6
Secondary Expansion Cohort: MelanomaDose Expansion Phase: Minimum Serum Post-dose (Ctrough) Concentration of AvelumabDay 4319.8 Microgram per milliliterStandard Deviation 21.5
Secondary Expansion Cohort: MelanomaDose Expansion Phase: Minimum Serum Post-dose (Ctrough) Concentration of AvelumabDay 5716.2 Microgram per milliliterStandard Deviation 15.2
Secondary Expansion Cohort: MesotheliomaDose Expansion Phase: Minimum Serum Post-dose (Ctrough) Concentration of AvelumabDay 4329.0 Microgram per milliliterStandard Deviation 17.6
Secondary Expansion Cohort: MesotheliomaDose Expansion Phase: Minimum Serum Post-dose (Ctrough) Concentration of AvelumabDay 16932.5 Microgram per milliliterStandard Deviation 14.7
Secondary Expansion Cohort: MesotheliomaDose Expansion Phase: Minimum Serum Post-dose (Ctrough) Concentration of AvelumabDay 7131.1 Microgram per milliliterStandard Deviation 18.8
Secondary Expansion Cohort: MesotheliomaDose Expansion Phase: Minimum Serum Post-dose (Ctrough) Concentration of AvelumabDay 5730.6 Microgram per milliliterStandard Deviation 18.1
Secondary Expansion Cohort: MesotheliomaDose Expansion Phase: Minimum Serum Post-dose (Ctrough) Concentration of AvelumabDay 1520.1 Microgram per milliliterStandard Deviation 10.1
Secondary Expansion Cohort: MesotheliomaDose Expansion Phase: Minimum Serum Post-dose (Ctrough) Concentration of AvelumabDay 8535.6 Microgram per milliliterStandard Deviation 20.7
Secondary Expansion Cohort: MesotheliomaDose Expansion Phase: Minimum Serum Post-dose (Ctrough) Concentration of AvelumabDay 2927.0 Microgram per milliliterStandard Deviation 23.9
Secondary Expansion Cohort: Urothelial CarcinomaDose Expansion Phase: Minimum Serum Post-dose (Ctrough) Concentration of AvelumabDay 16928.3 Microgram per milliliterStandard Deviation 20
Secondary Expansion Cohort: Urothelial CarcinomaDose Expansion Phase: Minimum Serum Post-dose (Ctrough) Concentration of AvelumabDay 2923.9 Microgram per milliliterStandard Deviation 16.2
Secondary Expansion Cohort: Urothelial CarcinomaDose Expansion Phase: Minimum Serum Post-dose (Ctrough) Concentration of AvelumabDay 8531.2 Microgram per milliliterStandard Deviation 22
Secondary Expansion Cohort: Urothelial CarcinomaDose Expansion Phase: Minimum Serum Post-dose (Ctrough) Concentration of AvelumabDay 5728.5 Microgram per milliliterStandard Deviation 20.3
Secondary Expansion Cohort: Urothelial CarcinomaDose Expansion Phase: Minimum Serum Post-dose (Ctrough) Concentration of AvelumabDay 1522.3 Microgram per milliliterStandard Deviation 11.1
Secondary Expansion Cohort: Urothelial CarcinomaDose Expansion Phase: Minimum Serum Post-dose (Ctrough) Concentration of AvelumabDay 7130.4 Microgram per milliliterStandard Deviation 23
Secondary Expansion Cohort: Urothelial CarcinomaDose Expansion Phase: Minimum Serum Post-dose (Ctrough) Concentration of AvelumabDay 4327.7 Microgram per milliliterStandard Deviation 18.1
Secondary Expansion Cohort: Ovarian CancerDose Expansion Phase: Minimum Serum Post-dose (Ctrough) Concentration of AvelumabDay 1517.6 Microgram per milliliterStandard Deviation 10.7
Secondary Expansion Cohort: Ovarian CancerDose Expansion Phase: Minimum Serum Post-dose (Ctrough) Concentration of AvelumabDay 4325.2 Microgram per milliliterStandard Deviation 17.7
Secondary Expansion Cohort: Ovarian CancerDose Expansion Phase: Minimum Serum Post-dose (Ctrough) Concentration of AvelumabDay 16937.3 Microgram per milliliterStandard Deviation 31.6
Secondary Expansion Cohort: Ovarian CancerDose Expansion Phase: Minimum Serum Post-dose (Ctrough) Concentration of AvelumabDay 8528.0 Microgram per milliliterStandard Deviation 14.6
Secondary Expansion Cohort: Ovarian CancerDose Expansion Phase: Minimum Serum Post-dose (Ctrough) Concentration of AvelumabDay 2921.3 Microgram per milliliterStandard Deviation 13
Secondary Expansion Cohort: Ovarian CancerDose Expansion Phase: Minimum Serum Post-dose (Ctrough) Concentration of AvelumabDay 5724.1 Microgram per milliliterStandard Deviation 15.6
Secondary Expansion Cohort: Ovarian CancerDose Expansion Phase: Minimum Serum Post-dose (Ctrough) Concentration of AvelumabDay 7124.2 Microgram per milliliterStandard Deviation 14.7
Secondary

Dose Expansion Phase: Serum Concentration at End of Infusion (CEOI) of Avelumab

Serum concentration at end of infusion (CEOI) of Avelumab is reported.

Time frame: At Day 1, 15, 29, 43, 85, 127 and 169

Population: Pharmacokinetic analysis set was used. Here Overall number of participants analyzed signifies those who were evaluable for this outcome measure and Number analyzed signifies those who were evaluable at specified time points. Data was reported for those arms for which end of infusion sample were collected as per planned analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 1.0 mg/kgDose Expansion Phase: Serum Concentration at End of Infusion (CEOI) of AvelumabDay 85266 Microgram per milliliterStandard Deviation 79.5
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 1.0 mg/kgDose Expansion Phase: Serum Concentration at End of Infusion (CEOI) of AvelumabDay 43250 Microgram per milliliterStandard Deviation 69.8
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 1.0 mg/kgDose Expansion Phase: Serum Concentration at End of Infusion (CEOI) of AvelumabDay 1246 Microgram per milliliterStandard Deviation 87.4
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 1.0 mg/kgDose Expansion Phase: Serum Concentration at End of Infusion (CEOI) of AvelumabDay 169304 Microgram per milliliterStandard Deviation 64.9
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 3.0 mg/kgDose Expansion Phase: Serum Concentration at End of Infusion (CEOI) of AvelumabDay 1272 Microgram per milliliterStandard Deviation 73.9
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 3.0 mg/kgDose Expansion Phase: Serum Concentration at End of Infusion (CEOI) of AvelumabDay 15297 Microgram per milliliterStandard Deviation 99.6
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 3.0 mg/kgDose Expansion Phase: Serum Concentration at End of Infusion (CEOI) of AvelumabDay 169272 Microgram per milliliter
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 3.0 mg/kgDose Expansion Phase: Serum Concentration at End of Infusion (CEOI) of AvelumabDay 29287 Microgram per milliliterStandard Deviation 89.5
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 3.0 mg/kgDose Expansion Phase: Serum Concentration at End of Infusion (CEOI) of AvelumabDay 43306 Microgram per milliliterStandard Deviation 108
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 3.0 mg/kgDose Expansion Phase: Serum Concentration at End of Infusion (CEOI) of AvelumabDay 127269 Microgram per milliliterStandard Deviation 45.4
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 3.0 mg/kgDose Expansion Phase: Serum Concentration at End of Infusion (CEOI) of AvelumabDay 85216 Microgram per milliliterStandard Deviation 24.9
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 10.0 mg/kgDose Expansion Phase: Serum Concentration at End of Infusion (CEOI) of AvelumabDay 127339 Microgram per milliliterStandard Deviation 41.4
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 10.0 mg/kgDose Expansion Phase: Serum Concentration at End of Infusion (CEOI) of AvelumabDay 169287 Microgram per milliliter
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 10.0 mg/kgDose Expansion Phase: Serum Concentration at End of Infusion (CEOI) of AvelumabDay 15305 Microgram per milliliterStandard Deviation 88.1
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 10.0 mg/kgDose Expansion Phase: Serum Concentration at End of Infusion (CEOI) of AvelumabDay 29291 Microgram per milliliterStandard Deviation 60.3
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 10.0 mg/kgDose Expansion Phase: Serum Concentration at End of Infusion (CEOI) of AvelumabDay 43294 Microgram per milliliterStandard Deviation 57.4
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 10.0 mg/kgDose Expansion Phase: Serum Concentration at End of Infusion (CEOI) of AvelumabDay 85348 Microgram per milliliterStandard Deviation 65.6
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 10.0 mg/kgDose Expansion Phase: Serum Concentration at End of Infusion (CEOI) of AvelumabDay 1343 Microgram per milliliterStandard Deviation 117
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 20.0 mg/kgDose Expansion Phase: Serum Concentration at End of Infusion (CEOI) of AvelumabDay 169235 Microgram per milliliter
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 20.0 mg/kgDose Expansion Phase: Serum Concentration at End of Infusion (CEOI) of AvelumabDay 85252 Microgram per milliliterStandard Deviation 78.9
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 20.0 mg/kgDose Expansion Phase: Serum Concentration at End of Infusion (CEOI) of AvelumabDay 43255 Microgram per milliliterStandard Deviation 69.7
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 20.0 mg/kgDose Expansion Phase: Serum Concentration at End of Infusion (CEOI) of AvelumabDay 1239 Microgram per milliliterStandard Deviation 50.2
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 10.0 mg/kg WeeklyDose Expansion Phase: Serum Concentration at End of Infusion (CEOI) of AvelumabDay 85263 Microgram per milliliterStandard Deviation 66.4
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 10.0 mg/kg WeeklyDose Expansion Phase: Serum Concentration at End of Infusion (CEOI) of AvelumabDay 169233 Microgram per milliliterStandard Deviation 90.4
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 10.0 mg/kg WeeklyDose Expansion Phase: Serum Concentration at End of Infusion (CEOI) of AvelumabDay 1247 Microgram per milliliterStandard Deviation 77.3
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 10.0 mg/kg WeeklyDose Expansion Phase: Serum Concentration at End of Infusion (CEOI) of AvelumabDay 43268 Microgram per milliliterStandard Deviation 72
Primary Expansion Cohort: NSCLC, Post-platinum DoubletDose Expansion Phase: Serum Concentration at End of Infusion (CEOI) of AvelumabDay 1224 Microgram per milliliterStandard Deviation 55.4
Primary Expansion Cohort: NSCLC, Post-platinum DoubletDose Expansion Phase: Serum Concentration at End of Infusion (CEOI) of AvelumabDay 169313 Microgram per milliliterStandard Deviation 59.3
Primary Expansion Cohort: NSCLC, Post-platinum DoubletDose Expansion Phase: Serum Concentration at End of Infusion (CEOI) of AvelumabDay 43241 Microgram per milliliterStandard Deviation 58.1
Primary Expansion Cohort: NSCLC, Post-platinum DoubletDose Expansion Phase: Serum Concentration at End of Infusion (CEOI) of AvelumabDay 85247 Microgram per milliliterStandard Deviation 66.4
Primary Expansion Cohort: NSCLC, First LineDose Expansion Phase: Serum Concentration at End of Infusion (CEOI) of AvelumabDay 43240 Microgram per milliliterStandard Deviation 93.1
Primary Expansion Cohort: NSCLC, First LineDose Expansion Phase: Serum Concentration at End of Infusion (CEOI) of AvelumabDay 1241 Microgram per milliliterStandard Deviation 75
Primary Expansion Cohort: NSCLC, First LineDose Expansion Phase: Serum Concentration at End of Infusion (CEOI) of AvelumabDay 85237 Microgram per milliliterStandard Deviation 5.54
Primary Expansion Cohort: Metastatic Breast CancerDose Expansion Phase: Serum Concentration at End of Infusion (CEOI) of AvelumabDay 85255 Microgram per milliliterStandard Deviation 57.7
Primary Expansion Cohort: Metastatic Breast CancerDose Expansion Phase: Serum Concentration at End of Infusion (CEOI) of AvelumabDay 43249 Microgram per milliliterStandard Deviation 105
Primary Expansion Cohort: Metastatic Breast CancerDose Expansion Phase: Serum Concentration at End of Infusion (CEOI) of AvelumabDay 1212 Microgram per milliliterStandard Deviation 47.6
Primary Expansion Cohort: Metastatic Breast CancerDose Expansion Phase: Serum Concentration at End of Infusion (CEOI) of AvelumabDay 169245 Microgram per milliliterStandard Deviation 51.7
Secondary

Efficacy Expansion Cohorts: Duration of Response According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 as Per Independent Endpoint Review Committee (IERC)

Duration of response according to modified irRC, per investigator assessment was calculated for each participant with a confirmed response (immune-related complete response \[irCR\] or immune-related partial response \[irPR\]) as the time from the first observation of response to the first observation of documented disease progression (or death within 12 weeks of the last tumor assessment). irCR: Complete disappearance of all tumor lesions (both index and non-index lesions with no new measurable/unmeasurable lesions). irPR: At least 30% reduction from baseline in the sum of the longest diameter (SLD) of all lesions). Results were calculated based on Kaplan-Meier estimates.

Time frame: Efficacy Expansion: Baseline up to Day 1072

Population: FAS included all participants who have received at least 1 dose of study treatment. Here Overall number of participants analyzed signifies those who were evaluable for this outcome measure. This outcome measure was planned to be analyzed in Efficacy expansion cohorts only.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 1.0 mg/kgEfficacy Expansion Cohorts: Duration of Response According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 as Per Independent Endpoint Review Committee (IERC)NA Months
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 3.0 mg/kgEfficacy Expansion Cohorts: Duration of Response According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 as Per Independent Endpoint Review Committee (IERC)NA Months
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 10.0 mg/kgEfficacy Expansion Cohorts: Duration of Response According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 as Per Independent Endpoint Review Committee (IERC)NA Months
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 20.0 mg/kgEfficacy Expansion Cohorts: Duration of Response According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 as Per Independent Endpoint Review Committee (IERC)NA Months
Secondary

Efficacy Expansion Cohorts: Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Time According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version (RECIST) 1.1 as Per Independent Endpoint Review Committee (IERC)

The PFS time (based on IERC), according to the RECIST 1.1, was defined as the time from first administration of study treatment until first documentation of progressive disease (PD) or death when death occurred within 12 weeks of the last tumor assessment or first administration of study treatment (whichever was later). PD was defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of longest diameter (SLD), taking as reference the smallest SLD recorded from baseline or the appearance of 1 or more new lesions and unequivocal progression of non-target lesions. The analysis of PFS was performed with a Kaplan-Meier method.

Time frame: Efficacy Expansion: Baseline up to Day 1072

Population: FAS included all participants who have received at least 1 dose of study treatment. Here Overall number of participants analyzed signifies those who were evaluable for this outcome measure. This outcome measure was planned to be analyzed in Efficacy expansion cohorts only.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 1.0 mg/kgEfficacy Expansion Cohorts: Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Time According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version (RECIST) 1.1 as Per Independent Endpoint Review Committee (IERC)1.87 Months
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 3.0 mg/kgEfficacy Expansion Cohorts: Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Time According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version (RECIST) 1.1 as Per Independent Endpoint Review Committee (IERC)1.45 Months
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 10.0 mg/kgEfficacy Expansion Cohorts: Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Time According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version (RECIST) 1.1 as Per Independent Endpoint Review Committee (IERC)1.31 Months
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 20.0 mg/kgEfficacy Expansion Cohorts: Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Time According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version (RECIST) 1.1 as Per Independent Endpoint Review Committee (IERC)1.41 Months
Secondary

Primary Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Unconfirmed Response at Week 13 According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1

The response criteria evaluation was carried out according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1. CR and PR did not need to be confirmed by a subsequent tumor assessment due to blinded central assessment. CR: Disappearance of all target lesions since baseline; PR: At least a 30% decrease in the sum of the diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters; SD: Neither sufficient increase to qualify for PD nor sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR and PD: at least a 20% increase in SLD, taking as reference smallest SLD recorded from baseline/appearance of 1or more new lesions and unequivocal progression of non-target lesions. Number of participants with unconfirmed response at week 13 according to response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST) version 1.1 were reported.

Time frame: Week 13

Population: Efficacy analysis set included all participants who have received at least 1 dose of study treatment and have measurable disease at baseline according to investigator assessment. This outcome measure was planned to be analyzed in Primary expansion cohorts only

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 1.0 mg/kgPrimary Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Unconfirmed Response at Week 13 According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1Unconfirmed Complete Response2 Participants
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 1.0 mg/kgPrimary Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Unconfirmed Response at Week 13 According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1Non-evaluable24 Participants
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 1.0 mg/kgPrimary Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Unconfirmed Response at Week 13 According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1Unconfirmed Partial Response28 Participants
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 1.0 mg/kgPrimary Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Unconfirmed Response at Week 13 According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1Unconfirmed Stable Disease62 Participants
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 1.0 mg/kgPrimary Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Unconfirmed Response at Week 13 According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1Unconfirmed Progressive Disease68 Participants
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 3.0 mg/kgPrimary Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Unconfirmed Response at Week 13 According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1Unconfirmed Complete Response1 Participants
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 3.0 mg/kgPrimary Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Unconfirmed Response at Week 13 According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1Unconfirmed Partial Response24 Participants
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 3.0 mg/kgPrimary Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Unconfirmed Response at Week 13 According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1Non-evaluable49 Participants
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 3.0 mg/kgPrimary Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Unconfirmed Response at Week 13 According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1Unconfirmed Progressive Disease28 Participants
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 3.0 mg/kgPrimary Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Unconfirmed Response at Week 13 According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1Unconfirmed Stable Disease54 Participants
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 10.0 mg/kgPrimary Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Unconfirmed Response at Week 13 According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1Non-evaluable15 Participants
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 10.0 mg/kgPrimary Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Unconfirmed Response at Week 13 According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1Unconfirmed Complete Response1 Participants
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 10.0 mg/kgPrimary Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Unconfirmed Response at Week 13 According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1Unconfirmed Partial Response7 Participants
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 10.0 mg/kgPrimary Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Unconfirmed Response at Week 13 According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1Unconfirmed Progressive Disease107 Participants
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 10.0 mg/kgPrimary Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Unconfirmed Response at Week 13 According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1Unconfirmed Stable Disease38 Participants
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 20.0 mg/kgPrimary Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Unconfirmed Response at Week 13 According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1Unconfirmed Complete Response0 Participants
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 20.0 mg/kgPrimary Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Unconfirmed Response at Week 13 According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1Unconfirmed Stable Disease11 Participants
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 20.0 mg/kgPrimary Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Unconfirmed Response at Week 13 According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1Unconfirmed Partial Response6 Participants
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 20.0 mg/kgPrimary Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Unconfirmed Response at Week 13 According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1Unconfirmed Progressive Disease37 Participants
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 20.0 mg/kgPrimary Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Unconfirmed Response at Week 13 According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1Non-evaluable6 Participants
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 10.0 mg/kg WeeklyPrimary Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Unconfirmed Response at Week 13 According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1Unconfirmed Progressive Disease31 Participants
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 10.0 mg/kg WeeklyPrimary Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Unconfirmed Response at Week 13 According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1Non-evaluable8 Participants
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 10.0 mg/kg WeeklyPrimary Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Unconfirmed Response at Week 13 According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1Unconfirmed Complete Response2 Participants
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 10.0 mg/kg WeeklyPrimary Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Unconfirmed Response at Week 13 According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1Unconfirmed Stable Disease44 Participants
Dose Escalation Cohort: Avelumab 10.0 mg/kg WeeklyPrimary Expansion Cohorts: Number of Participants With Unconfirmed Response at Week 13 According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1Unconfirmed Partial Response5 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 10, 2026