Revisional Versus Primary Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass: a Case Matched Analysis

Status

Completed

Phases

Unknown

Study type

Observational

Source

ClinicalTrials.gov

Registry ID

NCT01771744

Enrollment

Registered

2013-01-18

Start date

2000-01-31

Completion date

2013-01-31

Last updated

2013-01-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Effect of Revisional Surgery for Failed Gastric Banding

Brief summary

This study compared revisional malabsorptive laparoscopic very very long limb gastric bypass (VVLL RYGB) with primary VVLL RYGB and tested the hypothesis that one staged revisional laparoscopic VVLL RYGB is a safe and effective procedure after failed restrictive gastric banding.

Interventions

None listed

Study design

Observational model

CASE_CONTROL

Time perspective

RETROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

ALL

Age

18 Years to 65 Years

Healthy volunteers

Inclusion criteria

* Primary Gastric Bypass according to SMOB (Swiss group for the study of morbid obesity) Guidelines * Revisional Gastric Bypass after failed Gastric Banding

Exclusion criteria

* According to SMOB Criteria

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
weight loss	2 years

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
Complication rate	early (30 days) and late (> 30 days)

Outcome results