Skip to content

Cone-beam vs Multidetector Computed Tomography (CT) for Arthrography of the Wrist, Ankle, Elbow and Knee

Performance of Cone-beam Computed Tomography (CT) Compared to Multidetector CT for Arthrography of the Wrist, Ankle, Elbow and Knee

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01771393
Acronym
ARCOBE
Enrollment
69
Registered
2013-01-18
Start date
2012-07-31
Completion date
2013-06-30
Last updated
2025-12-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cartilage Ulceration of the Distal Joints

Keywords

arthroscanner, cone-beam computed tomodensitometry

Brief summary

ConeBeam scanner (CBCT) is a widely technique used for dental and maxillofacial imaging. Patients can be set up in a sitting or a laying position in the, Newtom 5G CBCT allowing for an analysis of the limbs distal joints. Our hypothesis is that the cone-beam scanner could detect and characterize chondral lesions the cartilage similarly to a multidetector CT (MDCT). 100 patients over 18 years requiring arthroscanner of the wrist, ankle, elbow or knee will be enrolled The primary endpoint based on the ability of cone-beam scanner to detect cartilage lesions. Secondary endpoints will concern the depiction of the joint lesions, quality of the images, tolerability of the exams and inter- intra-operator reproducibility. After arthrography, patients will have a MDCT considered as the reference exam, and a CBCT on a randomized order. Exams will be anonymized and read twice by two trained radiologists with 3-6 week intervals. The inter-observer agreement for the diagnosis of cartilage lesion type between the two techniques will be evaluated by a kappa coefficient. The evaluation of diagnostic performance will be achieved by studying the sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value and positive predictive value, and its likelihood ratio. Kappa test will be performed to evaluate the consistency of the depiction of the lesions. A Student t test will be performed for paired data if distributions are normal, a Wilcoxon test if not. To assess patient's tolerance, the percentages of (painful, not painful) will be calculated for each technique and will be compared using the Chi2 test (or Fisher's exact test if the chi can not apply).

Interventions

DEVICECBCT prior to MDCT

Cone-beam scanner is performed immediately after arthrography, then multidetector scanner is performed.

DEVICEMDCT prior to CBCT

Multidetector scanner is performed immediately after arthrography, then Cone-beam scanner is performed.

Sponsors

Hospices Civils de Lyon
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patient age 18 years old or above, weight ≤ 160 Kg * Patient require knee or ankle or elbow or wrist arthroscanner * French spoken an read * Free and informed consent signed * Being affiliated to a French social security system or similar.

Exclusion criteria

* Patients already included in the ARCOBE study * Patient with severe pain and reduced spontaneous mobility that could prevent proper positioning for the cone-beam * Lack of effective contraception (risk of pregnancy) or pregnancy proven data on interrogations * Patient on protection of the court, under supervision or trusteeship * Inability to express a consent * Patients already enrolled in a study with a conflict of interest with this study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
cartilage damage thicknessparticipants will be followed for the duration of the arthrography CT , an expected average of 2 hours0- normal, 1- Linear cartilage tear, 2- focal ulceration of less than 50% of the cartilage thickness, 3-: - focal ulceration of greater than 50% of the cartilage thickness, 4- Full thickness ulceration of the cartilage

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Image quality (for CBCT and MDCT)participants will be followed for the duration of the arthrography CT , an expected average of 2 hours0 - Insufficient, 1 - Poor, 2 - Average, 3 - Good, 4 - Excellent
Tolerability of the exam (for CBCT and MDCT)participants will be followed for the duration of the arthrography CT , an expected average of 2 hoursPerfect, tolerable, hardly tolerable, intolerable
Duration of the exam (for CBCT and MDCT)participants will be followed for the duration of the arthrography CT , an expected average of 2 hoursPerfect, tolerable, hardly tolerable, intolerable
cartilage damage measurementsparticipants will be followed for the duration of the arthrography CT , an expected average of 2 hoursQuantitative assessment of each location of cartilage damage by maximal diameter in two orthogonal planes tangential to the surface
Lesion of intrinsic ligament (for CBCT and MDCT)participants will be followed for the duration of the arthrography CT , an expected average of 2 hoursYes / No
Osteochondroma (for CBCT and MDCT)participants will be followed for the duration of the arthrography CT , an expected average of 2 hoursEach osteochondroma is located (anterior/posterior Medial/ lateral recess, and diameter is measured.: \>3mm, 3 to 5 mm, \>5mm
Meniscal lesion (for arthrography CBCT and MDCT of the knee)participants will be followed for the duration of the arthrography CT , an expected average of 2 hoursNo lesion, longitudinal tear, radial tear, complex tear, displaced tear, bucket handle tear
Subchondral bone lesion (for CBCT and MDCT)participants will be followed for the duration of the arthrography CT , an expected average of 2 hoursNo subchondral bone lesion, subchondral bone thickening, subchondral cyst \<3mm diameter, subchondral cyst 3 to 5 mm diameter, subchondral cyst \>5mm diameter

Countries

France

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026