Skip to content

Impact of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Language Functions in Mild Cognitive Impairment

Impact of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Language Functions in Mild Cognitive Impairment: A Proof-of-principle Study and Neural Correlates

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01771211
Acronym
STIMCI
Enrollment
18
Registered
2013-01-18
Start date
2012-12-31
Completion date
2013-07-31
Last updated
2013-08-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Mild Cognitive Impairment

Keywords

MCI, Word-retrieval, tDCS, fMRI

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to determine if non-invasive electrical brain stimulation can improve word-retrieval in Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI).

Detailed description

Previous studies showed that anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (atDCS) can have beneficial effects on word-retrieval in healthy younger and older subjects. The present study aims to extend these findings by assessing whether atDCS can also improve known impairments of word-retrieval in Mild Cognitive Impairment. atDCS will be applied to the left inferior frontal gyrus in a sham controlled cross-over within subjects design. Simultaneous functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) will assess underlying neural effects of the stimulation.

Interventions

DEVICEtDCS

anodal tDCS will be delivered with a constant current of 1 mA during resting-state and task-related fMRI and will continue until the end of the word-generation task. For both stimulation conditions (atDCS, sham) the current will be initially increased in a ramp-like fashion over 10 s, eliciting a tingling sensation on the scalp that fades over seconds. During sham stimulation the current will be turned off after 30 s.

Sponsors

German Research Foundation
CollaboratorOTHER
Charite University, Berlin, Germany
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
BASIC_SCIENCE
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
45 Years to 86 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* right handed * German native speakers * clinical diagnosis of Mild Cognitive Impairment

Exclusion criteria

* dementia * other current or previous neurological or current psychiatric diseases * alcohol or drug abuse * MRI contraindication (e.g., magnetic metal, pacemaker, claustrophobia

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of correct responses during word-generation tasks (max. 60)Change in number of correct responses between Assessment 1 (week 1) and Assessment 2 (week 2), assessments 1 and 2 are seperated by one weekSubjects are assessed in a cross-over design. The primary outcome measure will be assessed twice in each subject, either during sham stimulation or active stimulation with transcranial direct current stimulation. Order of stimulation (sham, atDCS or atDCS, sham) will be counterbalanced across the group. The study design has been described in detail before (Meinzer et al., 2012, Journal of Neuroscience, 32:1859 -1866).

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Neural activity during word-generation task assessed by functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI)Change in fMRI activity between Assessment 1 (week 1) and Assessment 2 (week 2), assessments 1 and 2 are seperated by one week

Countries

Germany

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026