Skip to content

The Effect of the Cosmetic Cream NMBM on Leg Ulcers - a Pilot Study

A Randomized, Parallel Group, Controlled Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of NMBM in the Treatment of Subjects With a Post-cellulitis and Venous Leg Ulcer

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 1Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01770509
Enrollment
30
Registered
2013-01-17
Start date
2013-02-28
Completion date
2015-02-28
Last updated
2017-01-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Leg Ulcer, Skin Ulcer, Ulcer, Venous Ulcer

Keywords

Chronic venous leg ulcers, Venous ulcer, Stasis ulcer, Varicose ulcer

Brief summary

Ulcers of the lower extremities, caused by chronic venous insufficiency and cellulitis are common in patients older than 65 years and cause a significant morbidity. Natural Matrix Bio polymer Membrane (NMBM) is a novel topical cosmetic cream containing a mix of natural waxes, sugars and lipids. The aim of this study is to test whether of Natural Matrix Bio polymer Membrane (NMBM) is effective as an adjunctive therapy to the treatment of venous stasis and post-erysipelas leg ulcers.

Detailed description

Ulcers of the lower extremities, particularly in patients older than 65 years, are common among the population. Studies estimate the prevalence of current chronic leg ulcers at approximately 1%. The most common cause (approximately 80%) is thought to be chronic venous insufficiency disease. Recurrent cellulitis is an additional common cause. The ulcers cause a significant morbidity and negative impact on the patients' quality of life. The care of chronic vascular ulcers places a significant burden on the patient and the health care system. Additionally, these nonhealing ulcers place the patient at much higher risk for lower extremity amputation. Natural Matrix Bio polymer Membrane (NMBM) is a novel topical cosmetic cream containing a mix of natural waxes, sugars and lipids. The aim of this study is to test whether of Natural Matrix Bio polymer Membrane (NMBM) is effective as an adjunctive therapy to the treatment of venous stasis and post-erysipelas leg ulcers.

Interventions

DEVICENMBM

Daily application of NMBM in addition to compression therapy

Compression garments

Sponsors

M.D. Lederman Consulting Ltd
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 90 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Signed and dated written Institutional Review Board (IRB) or Independent Ethics Committee (IEC) approved informed consent obtained from the subject in accordance with the local regulations; 2. Male or female subjects, ≥18 to ≤90 years of age 3. Patient with venous or predominantly venous leg ulcer (ankle-brachial index \> 0.8) 4. Chronic venous insufficiency or post-erysipelas ulcer 5. Ulcer size between 5 and 170 sq cm, inclusive 6. Ulcer present for at least one month 7. ankle-brachial index \>0.7

Exclusion criteria

1. Suffers from diabetes mellitus with HbA1c ≥ 8% 2. Albumin less than 2\. 2. Patients with the following abnormal laboratory test levels hemoglobin \<10.5 g/dL platelet count \<100 x 109/L serum albumin level \< 2.5 g/dL 3. Suffers from clinically significant arterial disease 34. Has a known allergy to any of the compounds that are part of this protocol 45. Has evidence of the ulcer and / or infection extending to the underlying muscle, tendon or bone 56. Has used any investigational drug(s) within 30 days preceding randomization 67. Is unable to manage self-treatment 78. Is pregnant, nursing mother or a woman of child bearing potential who is not using an adequate form of contraception (or abstinence) 8. 9. Suffers from a condition which in the opinion of the Investigator would compromise the safety of the subject and / or the quality of the data 9. 10. Unwilling or unable to comply with study requirements.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Logarithm of Percentage of Baseline Ulcer SizeFrom start of treatment to 4 weeksLogarithm of percentage of baseline ulcer size. Log (ulcer area at 4 weeks/ulcer area at baseline \*100) Ulcer area measured as longest ulcer length x longest ulcer width

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Alleviation of Pain4 weeksPain in week 4, assessed by the patient on a visual analogue pain score from 0 to 10. 0 represents no pain, 10 represents worst pain
Incidence of Adverse Events at 4 Weeks4 weeksNumber of patients with adverse effects at 4 weeks
Incidence of Adverse Events4 weeksNumber of adverse effects at 4 weeks
Time to Complete Closure4 weeks

Countries

Israel

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Standard of Care
Standard of care: Dressings +Compression garments Compression garments: Compression garments
12
Application of NMBM
Daily application of NMBM NMBM: Daily application of NMBM in addition to compression therapy Compression garments: Compression garments
17
Total29

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyInjury01
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up12

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicStandard of CareApplication of NMBMTotal
Age, Continuous75.54 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.7
68.17 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.9
70.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.6
Gender
Female
5 Participants9 Participants14 Participants
Gender
Male
7 Participants8 Participants15 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Israel
12 participants17 participants29 participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
1 / 113 / 14
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 110 / 14

Outcome results

Primary

Logarithm of Percentage of Baseline Ulcer Size

Logarithm of percentage of baseline ulcer size. Log (ulcer area at 4 weeks/ulcer area at baseline \*100) Ulcer area measured as longest ulcer length x longest ulcer width

Time frame: From start of treatment to 4 weeks

Population: Analysis is based on measures from each ulcer, when some participants had more than one ulcer

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Standard of CareLogarithm of Percentage of Baseline Ulcer Size3.6043 Mean of log (percentage of baseline areaStandard Deviation 2.16636
Application of NMBMLogarithm of Percentage of Baseline Ulcer Size3.5030 Mean of log (percentage of baseline areaStandard Deviation 2.1113
p-value: 0.652ANOVA
Secondary

Alleviation of Pain

Pain in week 4, assessed by the patient on a visual analogue pain score from 0 to 10. 0 represents no pain, 10 represents worst pain

Time frame: 4 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Standard of CareAlleviation of Pain2.45 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.29
Application of NMBMAlleviation of Pain1.68 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.62
p-value: 0.645ANOVA
Secondary

Incidence of Adverse Events

Number of adverse effects at 4 weeks

Time frame: 4 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Standard of CareIncidence of Adverse Events1 number of adverse effects
Application of NMBMIncidence of Adverse Events3 number of adverse effects
Secondary

Incidence of Adverse Events at 4 Weeks

Number of patients with adverse effects at 4 weeks

Time frame: 4 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Standard of CareIncidence of Adverse Events at 4 Weeks1 Number of patients with adverse events
Application of NMBMIncidence of Adverse Events at 4 Weeks3 Number of patients with adverse events
Secondary

Time to Complete Closure

Time frame: 4 weeks

Population: Data was not collected as time to ulcer closure has been beyond the study period in the majority of patients

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026