Skip to content

Evaluating Modes of Influenza Transmission Observational Study of Community Acquired Influenza

Evaluating Modes of Influenza Transmission Work Package 1: Observational Study of Community Acquired Influenza

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01769430
Acronym
EMIT
Enrollment
178
Registered
2013-01-16
Start date
2012-12-31
Completion date
2013-03-31
Last updated
2025-04-25

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Influenza Virus Infection Transmission in Humans

Keywords

influenza virus, aerosol transmission, contact transmission, large droplet transmission, airborne infection

Brief summary

The recent swine origin influenza pandemic (2009), new emergence of swine origin H3N2v, and delayed availability of vaccine for these agents highlight the need to test and optimize public health intervention strategies to reduce transmission of influenza. We will use a new technology for biological particle collection (U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/162,395, McDevitt et al., Aerosol Sci Technol 2013) to make fundamental observations on infectious respiratory droplets in a study of up to 200 naturally occurring seasonal influenza cases. We will collect respiratory droplets shed by participants while breathing normally, talking, and spontaneously coughing. We will characterize the size distribution of droplets containing infectious virus. We will use these basic data to examine the roles of large and small respiratory droplets and examine how the interaction of host factors and virus type impact the shedding of infectious respiratory droplets. Subjects will be recruited through a web based respiratory illness surveillance system, health clinics and advertisement in the campus community. Sitting in the collection booth will not create additional discomfort or risk for volunteers already suffering from influenza infection. We will recruit up to 1000 persons with symptoms of acute respiratory illness for screening with collection of nasopharyngeal swabs and questionnaire. From among those screened, we will recruit 250 to give exhaled breath samples, and ask 50 people with influenza to return for follow up exhaled breath samples on up to two subsequent days. We hypothesize that (1) fine aerosols (\<5 microns in aerodynamic diameter) will contain more viral copies than coarse aerosol particles (\>= 5 microns) (2) fine aerosols will contain culturable virus indicating that the fine aerosols are infectious, (3) aerosol shedding will correlate with virus load measured by swabs, (4) presence of active cough during sampling will be associated with increased aerosol shedding, (5) clinical symptoms and signs, including fever can be used to predict viral aerosol shedding.

Detailed description

This study is a follow-on to earlier projects funded by the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the National Institute for Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) that developed the sampler and studied the impact of surgical masks on reducing viral aerosol release by persons infected with influenza virus. The funding organizations have no direct control over the study design, execution, or reporting and no access to identifiable human data. The CDC IRB has determined that the CDC is not engaged in human subjects research in this cooperative agreement. Hypotheses: * Fine particle aerosols will contain greater numbers of viral copies than will coarse aerosol particles. * Clinical symptoms and signs, including fever can be used to predict viral aerosol shedding * Fine aerosols will contain culturable virus indicating that the fine aerosols are infectious * Aerosol shedding will correlate with virus load measured by nasopharyngeal and throat swabs * Presence of active cough during sampling will be associated with increased aerosol shedding with a stronger correlation to be found with coarse than fine particle virus aerosols

Interventions

OTHERObservational Study of influenza aerosol shedding -- No Intervention

No intervention -- observational study only

Sponsors

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
CollaboratorFED
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID)
CollaboratorNIH
University of Maryland, College Park
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
CASE_ONLY
Time perspective
CROSS_SECTIONAL

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
10 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Presence of symptomatic respiratory infection or other evidence of respiratory infection: * During the influenza season, subjects will be enrolled if they have * influenza-like illness (symptoms of fever and either cough or sore throat) and either * a positive point of care rapid test for influenza infection or * objectively documented fever in the setting of a documented local influenza outbreak (presence of rapid test or PCR confirmed cases). * Onset within the previous 48 hours * Prior to onset of influenza season and if we have not achieved enrollment of our target population by the end of flu season, we will enroll subjects with cough, coryza (stuffy runny nose, sore throat, sneezing), and malaise (fatigue) characteristic of the 'common cold' often resulting from Human Rhinovirus, RSV, parainfluenza, and to some extent influenza virus.

Exclusion criteria

\-

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Viral Copy Number in 30-minute Exhaled Breath SampleDaily measurements on days 1 through 3 post onset of symptoms (each person contributed 1 to a max of 3 samples). Reported values are the geometric mean over all samples and persons.Total viral RNA copies detected in breath aerosol exhaled during a 30-minute sample collection. Participants sit for 30 minutes with face inside the cone/funnel of the Gesundheit-II (G-II) human bioaerosol collector (https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2012.762973) collecting air at 130 L/min. Particles in air are concentrated into a small volume of buffer. The copies per mL of buffer is measured by PCR and corrected to the total amount collected per 30-min sample. See publication in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1716561115) and PLoS Pathogens (https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1003205) for more details.
Total Fine Aerosol Infectious Influenza Virus in 30-minute Exhaled Breath SampleDaily measurements on days 1 through 3 post onset of symptoms (each person contributed 1 to a max of 3 samples). Reported values are the geometric mean over all samples and persons.Fluorescent Focus Assay detection of infectious influenza virus in Fine Particle (≤5 µm) aerosol reported as fluorescent focus units (FFU) per 30-minute breath sample. Aerosol samples were collected at 130 L/min for 30 minutes by an aerosol sampler that concentrated the aerosol in a small volume of liquid. The FFU/ml were multiplied by the volume of liquid in the final concentrate sample to obtain the total infectious particles per 30-minute sample. This outcome was peer reviewed and published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Comparison of Exhaled Virus in Community Acquired and Experimental InfectionMaximal shedding during days 1-3 post onset of symptoms (natural infections) or days 1-4 post inoculation (nasally inoculated volunteers)We compared influenza A viral aerosol shedding from volunteers nasally inoculated with A/Wisconsin/2005 (H3N2) and college community adults naturally infected with influenza A/H3N2 (2012-2013), selected for influenza-like illness with objectively measured fever or a positive Quidel QuickVue A&B test. Propensity scores were used to control for differences in symptom presentation observed between experimentally and naturally infected groups.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Self reported ILI and influenza diagnosed by campus health center

Pre-assignment details

must have fever measured by campus medical provider or by research clinic with a sore throat or cough, or a positive rapid antigen test for influenza A or B and must be within 3 days of onset of symptoms

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Community Acquired Influenza Virus Infection
Volunteers with positive rapid antigen test or objectively measured fever with complaint of cough or sore throat during the influenza season.
178
Total178

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicCommunity Acquired Influenza Virus Infection
Age, Continuous21 years
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
1 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
177 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
32 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
12 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
24 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
109 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
178 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
87 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
91 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 178
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 178
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 178

Outcome results

Primary

Total Fine Aerosol Infectious Influenza Virus in 30-minute Exhaled Breath Sample

Fluorescent Focus Assay detection of infectious influenza virus in Fine Particle (≤5 µm) aerosol reported as fluorescent focus units (FFU) per 30-minute breath sample. Aerosol samples were collected at 130 L/min for 30 minutes by an aerosol sampler that concentrated the aerosol in a small volume of liquid. The FFU/ml were multiplied by the volume of liquid in the final concentrate sample to obtain the total infectious particles per 30-minute sample. This outcome was peer reviewed and published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

Time frame: Daily measurements on days 1 through 3 post onset of symptoms (each person contributed 1 to a max of 3 samples). Reported values are the geometric mean over all samples and persons.

Population: Participants with complete data

ArmMeasureValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
Community Acquired Respiratory InfectionTotal Fine Aerosol Infectious Influenza Virus in 30-minute Exhaled Breath Sample41 Total FFU/30-minute sampleStandard Deviation 30
Primary

Viral Copy Number in 30-minute Exhaled Breath Sample

Total viral RNA copies detected in breath aerosol exhaled during a 30-minute sample collection. Participants sit for 30 minutes with face inside the cone/funnel of the Gesundheit-II (G-II) human bioaerosol collector (https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2012.762973) collecting air at 130 L/min. Particles in air are concentrated into a small volume of buffer. The copies per mL of buffer is measured by PCR and corrected to the total amount collected per 30-min sample. See publication in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1716561115) and PLoS Pathogens (https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1003205) for more details.

Time frame: Daily measurements on days 1 through 3 post onset of symptoms (each person contributed 1 to a max of 3 samples). Reported values are the geometric mean over all samples and persons.

Population: All cases meeting enrollment criteria

ArmMeasureGroupValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
Community Acquired Respiratory InfectionViral Copy Number in 30-minute Exhaled Breath SampleFine aerosol RNA copy number, Total copies per 30-minute breath sample38,000 Fine aerosol RNA copy numberStandard Deviation 13
Community Acquired Respiratory InfectionViral Copy Number in 30-minute Exhaled Breath SampleCoarse aerosol RNA copy number, Total per 30-minute breath sample12,000 Fine aerosol RNA copy numberStandard Deviation 14
Other Pre-specified

Comparison of Exhaled Virus in Community Acquired and Experimental Infection

We compared influenza A viral aerosol shedding from volunteers nasally inoculated with A/Wisconsin/2005 (H3N2) and college community adults naturally infected with influenza A/H3N2 (2012-2013), selected for influenza-like illness with objectively measured fever or a positive Quidel QuickVue A&B test. Propensity scores were used to control for differences in symptom presentation observed between experimentally and naturally infected groups.

Time frame: Maximal shedding during days 1-3 post onset of symptoms (natural infections) or days 1-4 post inoculation (nasally inoculated volunteers)

Population: Adults naturally infected with influenza A H3N2

ArmMeasureValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
Community Acquired Respiratory InfectionComparison of Exhaled Virus in Community Acquired and Experimental Infection39000 Fine aerosol RNA copies/ 30-min sampleStandard Deviation 15.12
Volunteers Nasally Inoculated With A/Wisconsin/2005 (H3N2)Comparison of Exhaled Virus in Community Acquired and Experimental Infection5100 Fine aerosol RNA copies/ 30-min sampleStandard Deviation 4.72
Post Hoc

Correlation of Exhaled Particle Counts and Viral Copy Numbers

A convenience subsample were tested for exhaled particle counts using an optical particle counter during research clinic visits as a postdoctoral exploratory investigation. No formal analysis was completed.

Time frame: Daily measurements on days 1 through 3 post onset of symptoms (each person contributed 1 to a max of 3 samples). Reported values are the geometric mean over all samples and persons.

Population: Convenience subsample

Post Hoc

Impact of Co-infection With Viral or Bacterial Pathogens on Fine Aerosol Shedding

Exploratory analysis of impact of other respiratory present in nasopharyngeal swabs on extent of aerosol shedding.

Time frame: Within 3 days of onset of influenza like illness

Population: Postdoc left lab without completing write up of analysis due to lack of finding a correlation. Notes and data from 12 years ago are no longer easily accessible.

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026