Skip to content

Evaluation Of The Efficacy And Safety Of Single Doses Of PF-05089771 In Patients With Primary (Inherited) Erythromelalgia

A RANDOMIZED, DOUBLE BLIND THIRD PARTY OPEN PLACEBO-CONTROLLED EXPLORATORY STUDY TO EVALUATE THE EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF SINGLE DOSES OF PF-05089771 IN PATIENTS WITH PRIMARY (INHERITED) ERYTHROMELALGIA

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01769274
Acronym
IEM
Enrollment
5
Registered
2013-01-16
Start date
2012-10-22
Completion date
2013-07-12
Last updated
2019-11-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Inherited Erythromelalgia

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of single doses of PF-05089771 against placebo in treatment of pain in patients with primary, inherited erythromelalgia.

Interventions

A single oral dose of PF-05089771 1600 mg solution to be administered on Day 1 of each treatment session. There are 2 treatment sessions, therefore 2 single oral doses of PF-05089771 will be adminstered.

DRUGPlacebo

Placebo for PF-05089771 1600 mg solution administered in each treatment session. There are 2 treatment sessions, therefore 2 single oral doses of placebo will be administered.

Sponsors

Pfizer
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 78 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Male and or female subjects between the ages of 18-78 years * Subject has clinical signs of IEM * Minimum BMI 17.5kg/m2 and total body weight \>50kg

Exclusion criteria

* Other severe pain conditions, e.g. rheumatologic, that may impair subject's self-assessment of pain due to IEM. * Evidence of clinically significant hypertension, clinically significant hematological, dermatological, renal, endocrine (except diabetes mellitus), pulmonary, gastrointestinal, cardiovascular, hepatic, neurological (other than IEM), or allergic disease (including drug allergies but excluding untreated asymptomatic seasonal allergies). * Subjects with severe obesity.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Average Pain Intensity Numerical Rating Scale (PI-NRS) Score - From 0 to 4 Hours Post-doseEvery 15 minutes from 0 to 4 hours post-doseParticipants rated severity of their pain at 11 point PI-NRS, by choosing a number between 0 and 10, where 0= no pain and 10= worst possible pain; higher scores signify more pain. The average pain score was calculated as the mean of the pain scores recorded every 15 minutes from 0 to 4 hours post-dose.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Average PI-NRS Scores - From Post Evoked Pain Time Point 3 (EP3) to 10 Hours Post-dosePost EP3, every 5 minutes for the first hour, then every 15 minutes up to 10 hours post-doseParticipants rated severity of their pain at 11 point PI-NRS, by choosing a number between 0 and 10. Where 0= no pain and 10= worst possible pain; higher scores signify more pain. Evoked pain time point 3= second time point post-dose when pain was evoked using the participant specific heat pain stimulus. EP3 is approximately a time point 8-9 hours post-dose. The average pain score was calculated as the mean of the pain scores recorded from EP3 to 10 hours post-dose.
Average PI-NRS Scores - From Post Evoked Pain Time Point 4 (EP4) to 28 Hours Post-dosePost EP4, every 5 minutes for the first hour, then every 15 minutes up to 28 hours post-doseParticipants rated severity of their pain at 11 point PI-NRS, by choosing a number between 0 and 10. Where 0= no pain and 10= worst possible pain; higher scores signify more pain. Evoked pain time point 4= third time point post-dose when pain was evoked using the participant specific heat pain stimulus. EP4 is approximately a time point 24-25 hours post-dose. The average pain score was calculated as the mean of the pain scores recorded from EP4 to 28 hours post-dose.
Maximum PI-NRS Scores - From 0 Hour to 4 Hours Post-doseFrom 0 hour to 4 hours post-doseParticipants rated severity of their pain at 11 point PI-NRS, by choosing a number between 0 and 10. Where 0= no pain and 10= worst possible pain; higher scores signify more pain. Maximum pain score in 4 hours period post-dosing is reported.
Maximum PI-NRS Scores - From Post EP2 to 8 Hours Post-doseFrom post EP2 to 8 hours post-doseParticipants rated severity of their pain at 11 point PI-NRS, by choosing a number between 0 and 10. Where 0= no pain and 10= worst possible pain; higher scores signify more pain. Evoked pain time point 2= first time point post-dose when pain was evoked using the participant specific heat pain stimulus. EP2 is approximately a time point 4-5 hours post-dose. Maximum pain score in period from post EP2 to 8 hours post-dose is reported.
Maximum PI-NRS Scores - From Post EP3 to 10 Hours Post-doseFrom the end of EP3 to 10 hours post doseParticipants rated severity of their pain at 11 point PI-NRS, by choosing a number between 0 and 10. Where 0= no pain and 10= worst possible pain; higher scores signify more pain. Evoked pain time point 3= second time point post-dose when pain was evoked using the participant specific heat pain stimulus. EP3 is approximately a time point 8-9 hours post-dose. Maximum pain score in period from post EP3 to 10 hours post-dose is reported.
Maximum PI-NRS Scores - From Post EP4 to 28 Hours Post-dosePost EP4, every 5 minutes for the first hour, then every 15 minutes up to 28 hours post-doseParticipants rated severity of their pain at 11 point PI-NRS, by choosing a number between 0 and 10. Where 0= no pain and 10= worst possible pain; higher scores signify more pain. Evoked pain time point 4= third time point post-dose when pain was evoked using the participant specific heat pain stimulus. EP4 is approximately a time point 24-25 hours post-dose. Maximum pain score in period from post EP4 to 28 hours post-dose is reported.
Duration When PI-NRS Scores Were Greater Than (>) 5 - From 0 Hour to 4 Hours Post-doseFrom 0 hour to 4 hours post-doseParticipants rated severity of their pain at 11 point PI-NRS, by choosing a number between 0 and 10. Where 0= no pain and 10= worst possible pain; higher scores signify more pain. The duration of time that participants experienced PI-NRS score greater than 5 from the 0 hours to 4 hours post-dose.
Duration When PI-NRS Scores Were >5 - From Post EP2 to 8 Hours Post-dosePost EP2, every 5 minutes for the first hour, then every 15 minutes up to 8 hours post-doseParticipants rated severity of their pain at 11 point PI-NRS, by choosing a number between 0 and 10. Where 0= no pain and 10= worst possible pain; higher scores signify more pain. Evoked pain time point 2= first time point post-dose when pain was evoked using the participant specific heat pain stimulus. EP2 is approximately a time point 4-5 hours post-dose. The duration of time that participants experienced PI-NRS score \>5 from in period from post EP2 to 8 hours post-dose is reported.
Duration When PI-NRS Scores Were >5 - From Post EP3 to 10 Hours Post-dosePost EP3, every 5 minutes for the first hour, then every 15 minutes up to 10 hours post-doseParticipants rated severity of their pain at 11 point PI-NRS, by choosing a number between 0 and 10. Where 0= no pain and 10= worst possible pain; higher scores signify more pain. Evoked pain time point 3= second time point post-dose when pain was evoked using the participant specific heat pain stimulus. EP3 is approximately a time point 8-9 hours post-dose. The duration of time that participants experienced PI-NRS score \>5 from the post EP3 to 10 hours post dose.
Duration When PI-NRS Scores Were >5 - From Post EP4 to 28 Hours Post-doseAfter EP4, every 5 minutes for the first hour, then every 15 minutes up to 28 hours post-doseParticipants rated severity of their pain at 11 point PI-NRS, by choosing a number between 0 and 10. Where 0= no pain and 10= worst possible pain; higher scores signify more pain. Evoked pain time point 4= third time point post-dose when pain was evoked using the participant specific heat pain stimulus. EP4 is approximately a time point 24-25 hours post-dose. The duration of time that participants experienced PI-NRS score \>5 from post EP4 to 28 hours post-dose.
Average PI-NRS Score - From Post Evoked Pain Time Point 2 (EP2) to 8 Hours Post-dosePost EP2, every 5 minutes for the first hour, then every 15 minutes up to 8 hours post-doseParticipants rated severity of their pain at 11 point PI-NRS, by choosing a number between 0 and 10. Where 0= no pain and 10= worst possible pain; higher scores signify more pain. Evoked pain time point 2= first time point post-dose when pain was evoked using the participant specific heat pain stimulus. EP2 is approximately a time point 4-5 hours post-dose. The average pain score was calculated as the mean of the pain scores recorded from EP2 to 8 hours post-dose.
Time to First Use of Rescue Therapy or MedicationUp to maximum of 24 hours post-doseTime to rescue medication (hour) was calculated as: date/time of rescue medication minus date/time of first dose for each period. If participant who did not receive rescue medication, the time of censoring was cut off at 24 hours or the time of withdrawal, whichever was earlier. Kaplan-Meier method was used for estimation.
Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve From Time Zero to the 24 Hour Post-dose (AUC24) of PF-05089771Predose, 0.5, 2, 4, 6, and 24 hours post-dose
Area Under the Curve From Time Zero to Last Quantifiable Concentration (AUClast) of PF-05089771Predose and 0.5, 2, 4, 6, and 24 hours post dose
Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of PF-05089771Predose and 0.5, 2, 4, 6, and 24 hours post dose
Time to Reach Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of PF-05089771Predose and 0.5, 2, 4, 6, and 24 hours post dose
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)Baseline up to a maximum of Day 83An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. A treatment emergent AE was defined as an event that emerged during the treatment period that was absent before treatment, or worsened during the treatment period relative to the pretreatment state.
Number of Participants With Laboratory AbnormalitiesBaseline up to a maximum of Day 73Laboratory abnormalities: Hemoglobin (Hgb), hematocrit, red blood cell count: less than(\<)0.8\*lower limit of normal(LLN), platelet: \<0.5\*LLN/greater than (\>)1.75\*upper limit of normal (ULN), white blood cell: \<0.6\*LLN/\>1.5\*ULN, lymphocyte, neutrophil (absolute, %):\<0.8\*LLN/\>1.2\*ULN, total neutrophil \<0.8\*LLN;basophil, eosinophil, monocyte (absolute, %):\>1.2\*ULN; mean corpuscular (MC) volume, mean cell hemoglobin, MC hemoglobin concentration, mean platelet volume: \<0.9\*LLN/\>1.1\*ULN; total bilirubin \>1.5\*ULN, aspartate aminotransferase (AT), alanine AT, gammaglutamyl transferase, alkaline phosphatase:\> 3.0\*ULN, total protein, albumin: \<0.8\*LLN/\>1.2\*ULN; blood urea nitrogen, creatinine:\>1.3\*ULN, uric acid \>1.2\*ULN; sodium \<0.95\*LLN/\>1.05\*ULN, potassium, chloride, calcium, magnesium, bicarbonate: \<0.9\*LLN/\>1.1\*ULN; glucose \<0.6\*LLN/\>1.5\*ULN; urine (specific gravity \<1.003/\>1.030, pH \<4.5/\>8, glucose, ketone, protein, blood/Hgb, urobilinogen, bilirubin, nitrite, leukocyte esterase \>=1).
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes From Baseline in Core Body TemperatureBaseline up to a maximum of Day 83The minimum starting temperature to measure core body temperature used was 33 degree Celsius. Clinically significant changes from baseline in core body temperature was judged by investigator.
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes From Baseline in Blood PressureBaseline up to a maximum of Day 83Criteria for clinically significant blood pressure abnormalities: systolic blood pressure \>=30 millimetre of Mercury (mmHg) change from baseline in same posture, systolic blood pressure \<90 mmHg, diastolic blood pressure \>=20 mmHg change from baseline in same posture, diastolic blood pressure \<50 mmHg.
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes From Baseline in Electrocardiogram (ECG)Baseline up to a maximum of Day 83Criteria for clinically significant abnormalities in ECG : PR interval \>=300 millisecond (msec) and 25 percent (%) increase when baseline \>200 msec, 50% increase when baseline less than or equal to (\<=) 200 msec; QRS interval \>=140 msec, \>=50% increase from baseline; QT interval \>=500 msec; QT interval corrected using the Fridericia formula (QTcF) 450 msec to \<480 msec, \>=480 msec, 30 to \<60 msec increase from baseline, \>=60 msec increase from baseline.
Number of Participants With Participant's Global Satisfaction ScoreAt 4 hour post-dose or at time of first rescue therapy, whichever occurred firstParticipant was asked How would you rate the study medication you received for pain?. The participant was provided the following choices as an answer: excellent=4; good=3; fair=2; poor=1. Response to this question, was participant's overall impression (global evaluation) of the study medication at 4 hour post-dose or at time of first rescue treatment or medication, which ever occurred first.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
All Participants
All participants who were enrolled in the study.
5
Total5

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicAll Participants
Age, Continuous40.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 18.7
Sex: Female, Male
Female
2 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
3 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
5 / 55 / 55 / 54 / 5
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 50 / 50 / 50 / 5

Outcome results

Primary

Average Pain Intensity Numerical Rating Scale (PI-NRS) Score - From 0 to 4 Hours Post-dose

Participants rated severity of their pain at 11 point PI-NRS, by choosing a number between 0 and 10, where 0= no pain and 10= worst possible pain; higher scores signify more pain. The average pain score was calculated as the mean of the pain scores recorded every 15 minutes from 0 to 4 hours post-dose.

Time frame: Every 15 minutes from 0 to 4 hours post-dose

Population: Full analysis set included all participants who successfully completed Part A, were randomized in Part B, and who received at least 1 dose of randomized study medication.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Treatment Session 1: PF-05089771 1600 mgAverage Pain Intensity Numerical Rating Scale (PI-NRS) Score - From 0 to 4 Hours Post-dose2.08 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.2
Treatment Session 1: PlaceboAverage Pain Intensity Numerical Rating Scale (PI-NRS) Score - From 0 to 4 Hours Post-dose2.73 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.68
Treatment Session 2: PF-05089771 1600 mgAverage Pain Intensity Numerical Rating Scale (PI-NRS) Score - From 0 to 4 Hours Post-dose1.95 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.29
Treatment Session 2: PlaceboAverage Pain Intensity Numerical Rating Scale (PI-NRS) Score - From 0 to 4 Hours Post-dose2.04 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.81
Secondary

Area Under the Curve From Time Zero to Last Quantifiable Concentration (AUClast) of PF-05089771

Time frame: Predose and 0.5, 2, 4, 6, and 24 hours post dose

Population: PK parameter analysis set included all participants who were randomized, received study medication, and had at least 1 of the PK parameters of interest in at least 1 treatment session.

ArmMeasureValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
Treatment Session 1: PF-05089771 1600 mgArea Under the Curve From Time Zero to Last Quantifiable Concentration (AUClast) of PF-05089771652400 Nanogram*hour per milliliter (ng*hr/mL)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 19
Treatment Session 1: PlaceboArea Under the Curve From Time Zero to Last Quantifiable Concentration (AUClast) of PF-05089771658000 Nanogram*hour per milliliter (ng*hr/mL)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 26
Secondary

Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve From Time Zero to the 24 Hour Post-dose (AUC24) of PF-05089771

Time frame: Predose, 0.5, 2, 4, 6, and 24 hours post-dose

Population: Pharmacokinetic (PK) parameter analysis set included all participants who were randomized, received study medication, and had at least 1 of the PK parameters of interest in at least 1 treatment session.

ArmMeasureValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
Treatment Session 1: PF-05089771 1600 mgArea Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve From Time Zero to the 24 Hour Post-dose (AUC24) of PF-05089771652100 Nanogram*hour per milliliter (ng*hr/mL)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 19
Treatment Session 1: PlaceboArea Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve From Time Zero to the 24 Hour Post-dose (AUC24) of PF-05089771657500 Nanogram*hour per milliliter (ng*hr/mL)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 26
Secondary

Average PI-NRS Score - From Post Evoked Pain Time Point 2 (EP2) to 8 Hours Post-dose

Participants rated severity of their pain at 11 point PI-NRS, by choosing a number between 0 and 10. Where 0= no pain and 10= worst possible pain; higher scores signify more pain. Evoked pain time point 2= first time point post-dose when pain was evoked using the participant specific heat pain stimulus. EP2 is approximately a time point 4-5 hours post-dose. The average pain score was calculated as the mean of the pain scores recorded from EP2 to 8 hours post-dose.

Time frame: Post EP2, every 5 minutes for the first hour, then every 15 minutes up to 8 hours post-dose

Population: Full analysis set included all participants who successfully completed Part A, were randomized in Part B, and who received at least 1 dose of randomized study medication. Overall Number of Participants Analyzed = participants evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Treatment Session 1: PF-05089771 1600 mgAverage PI-NRS Score - From Post Evoked Pain Time Point 2 (EP2) to 8 Hours Post-dose0.70 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.64
Treatment Session 1: PlaceboAverage PI-NRS Score - From Post Evoked Pain Time Point 2 (EP2) to 8 Hours Post-dose0.61 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.46
Treatment Session 2: PF-05089771 1600 mgAverage PI-NRS Score - From Post Evoked Pain Time Point 2 (EP2) to 8 Hours Post-dose0.55 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.51
Treatment Session 2: PlaceboAverage PI-NRS Score - From Post Evoked Pain Time Point 2 (EP2) to 8 Hours Post-dose1.08 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.63
Secondary

Average PI-NRS Scores - From Post Evoked Pain Time Point 3 (EP3) to 10 Hours Post-dose

Participants rated severity of their pain at 11 point PI-NRS, by choosing a number between 0 and 10. Where 0= no pain and 10= worst possible pain; higher scores signify more pain. Evoked pain time point 3= second time point post-dose when pain was evoked using the participant specific heat pain stimulus. EP3 is approximately a time point 8-9 hours post-dose. The average pain score was calculated as the mean of the pain scores recorded from EP3 to 10 hours post-dose.

Time frame: Post EP3, every 5 minutes for the first hour, then every 15 minutes up to 10 hours post-dose

Population: Full analysis set included all participants who successfully completed Part A, were randomized in Part B, and who received at least 1 dose of randomized study medication. Overall Number of Participants Analyzed = participants evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Treatment Session 1: PF-05089771 1600 mgAverage PI-NRS Scores - From Post Evoked Pain Time Point 3 (EP3) to 10 Hours Post-dose1.19 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.22
Treatment Session 1: PlaceboAverage PI-NRS Scores - From Post Evoked Pain Time Point 3 (EP3) to 10 Hours Post-dose1.55 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.15
Treatment Session 2: PF-05089771 1600 mgAverage PI-NRS Scores - From Post Evoked Pain Time Point 3 (EP3) to 10 Hours Post-dose0.82 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.52
Treatment Session 2: PlaceboAverage PI-NRS Scores - From Post Evoked Pain Time Point 3 (EP3) to 10 Hours Post-dose1.39 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.58
Secondary

Average PI-NRS Scores - From Post Evoked Pain Time Point 4 (EP4) to 28 Hours Post-dose

Participants rated severity of their pain at 11 point PI-NRS, by choosing a number between 0 and 10. Where 0= no pain and 10= worst possible pain; higher scores signify more pain. Evoked pain time point 4= third time point post-dose when pain was evoked using the participant specific heat pain stimulus. EP4 is approximately a time point 24-25 hours post-dose. The average pain score was calculated as the mean of the pain scores recorded from EP4 to 28 hours post-dose.

Time frame: Post EP4, every 5 minutes for the first hour, then every 15 minutes up to 28 hours post-dose

Population: Full analysis set included all participants who successfully completed Part A, were randomized in Part B, and who received at least 1 dose of randomized study medication. Overall Number of Participants Analyzed = participants evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Treatment Session 1: PF-05089771 1600 mgAverage PI-NRS Scores - From Post Evoked Pain Time Point 4 (EP4) to 28 Hours Post-dose0.99 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.52
Treatment Session 1: PlaceboAverage PI-NRS Scores - From Post Evoked Pain Time Point 4 (EP4) to 28 Hours Post-dose0.91 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.53
Treatment Session 2: PF-05089771 1600 mgAverage PI-NRS Scores - From Post Evoked Pain Time Point 4 (EP4) to 28 Hours Post-dose0.36 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.08
Treatment Session 2: PlaceboAverage PI-NRS Scores - From Post Evoked Pain Time Point 4 (EP4) to 28 Hours Post-dose0.77 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.38
Secondary

Duration When PI-NRS Scores Were >5 - From Post EP2 to 8 Hours Post-dose

Participants rated severity of their pain at 11 point PI-NRS, by choosing a number between 0 and 10. Where 0= no pain and 10= worst possible pain; higher scores signify more pain. Evoked pain time point 2= first time point post-dose when pain was evoked using the participant specific heat pain stimulus. EP2 is approximately a time point 4-5 hours post-dose. The duration of time that participants experienced PI-NRS score \>5 from in period from post EP2 to 8 hours post-dose is reported.

Time frame: Post EP2, every 5 minutes for the first hour, then every 15 minutes up to 8 hours post-dose

Population: Full analysis set included all participants who successfully completed Part A, were randomized in Part B, and who received at least 1 dose of randomized study medication. Overall Number of Participants Analyzed = participants evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Treatment Session 1: PF-05089771 1600 mgDuration When PI-NRS Scores Were >5 - From Post EP2 to 8 Hours Post-dose0.0 MinutesStandard Deviation 0
Treatment Session 1: PlaceboDuration When PI-NRS Scores Were >5 - From Post EP2 to 8 Hours Post-dose0.0 MinutesStandard Deviation 0
Treatment Session 2: PF-05089771 1600 mgDuration When PI-NRS Scores Were >5 - From Post EP2 to 8 Hours Post-dose0.0 MinutesStandard Deviation 0
Treatment Session 2: PlaceboDuration When PI-NRS Scores Were >5 - From Post EP2 to 8 Hours Post-dose0.0 MinutesStandard Deviation 0
Secondary

Duration When PI-NRS Scores Were >5 - From Post EP3 to 10 Hours Post-dose

Participants rated severity of their pain at 11 point PI-NRS, by choosing a number between 0 and 10. Where 0= no pain and 10= worst possible pain; higher scores signify more pain. Evoked pain time point 3= second time point post-dose when pain was evoked using the participant specific heat pain stimulus. EP3 is approximately a time point 8-9 hours post-dose. The duration of time that participants experienced PI-NRS score \>5 from the post EP3 to 10 hours post dose.

Time frame: Post EP3, every 5 minutes for the first hour, then every 15 minutes up to 10 hours post-dose

Population: Full analysis set included all participants who successfully completed Part A, were randomized in Part B, and who received at least 1 dose of randomized study medication. Overall Number of Participants Analyzed = participants evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Treatment Session 1: PF-05089771 1600 mgDuration When PI-NRS Scores Were >5 - From Post EP3 to 10 Hours Post-dose0.0 MinutesStandard Deviation 0
Treatment Session 1: PlaceboDuration When PI-NRS Scores Were >5 - From Post EP3 to 10 Hours Post-dose0.0 MinutesStandard Deviation 10.4
Treatment Session 2: PF-05089771 1600 mgDuration When PI-NRS Scores Were >5 - From Post EP3 to 10 Hours Post-dose0.0 MinutesStandard Deviation 0
Treatment Session 2: PlaceboDuration When PI-NRS Scores Were >5 - From Post EP3 to 10 Hours Post-dose0.0 MinutesStandard Deviation 0
Secondary

Duration When PI-NRS Scores Were >5 - From Post EP4 to 28 Hours Post-dose

Participants rated severity of their pain at 11 point PI-NRS, by choosing a number between 0 and 10. Where 0= no pain and 10= worst possible pain; higher scores signify more pain. Evoked pain time point 4= third time point post-dose when pain was evoked using the participant specific heat pain stimulus. EP4 is approximately a time point 24-25 hours post-dose. The duration of time that participants experienced PI-NRS score \>5 from post EP4 to 28 hours post-dose.

Time frame: After EP4, every 5 minutes for the first hour, then every 15 minutes up to 28 hours post-dose

Population: Full analysis set included all participants who successfully completed Part A, were randomized in Part B, and who received at least 1 dose of randomized study medication. Overall Number of Participants Analyzed = participants evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Treatment Session 1: PF-05089771 1600 mgDuration When PI-NRS Scores Were >5 - From Post EP4 to 28 Hours Post-dose0.0 MinutesStandard Deviation 0
Treatment Session 1: PlaceboDuration When PI-NRS Scores Were >5 - From Post EP4 to 28 Hours Post-dose0.0 MinutesStandard Deviation 0
Treatment Session 2: PF-05089771 1600 mgDuration When PI-NRS Scores Were >5 - From Post EP4 to 28 Hours Post-dose0.0 MinutesStandard Deviation 0
Treatment Session 2: PlaceboDuration When PI-NRS Scores Were >5 - From Post EP4 to 28 Hours Post-dose0.0 MinutesStandard Deviation 0
Secondary

Duration When PI-NRS Scores Were Greater Than (>) 5 - From 0 Hour to 4 Hours Post-dose

Participants rated severity of their pain at 11 point PI-NRS, by choosing a number between 0 and 10. Where 0= no pain and 10= worst possible pain; higher scores signify more pain. The duration of time that participants experienced PI-NRS score greater than 5 from the 0 hours to 4 hours post-dose.

Time frame: From 0 hour to 4 hours post-dose

Population: Full analysis set included all participants who successfully completed Part A, were randomized in Part B, and who received at least 1 dose of randomized study medication.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Treatment Session 1: PF-05089771 1600 mgDuration When PI-NRS Scores Were Greater Than (>) 5 - From 0 Hour to 4 Hours Post-dose20.0 MinutesStandard Deviation 42
Treatment Session 1: PlaceboDuration When PI-NRS Scores Were Greater Than (>) 5 - From 0 Hour to 4 Hours Post-dose29.4 MinutesStandard Deviation 63
Treatment Session 2: PF-05089771 1600 mgDuration When PI-NRS Scores Were Greater Than (>) 5 - From 0 Hour to 4 Hours Post-dose10.4 MinutesStandard Deviation 23.3
Treatment Session 2: PlaceboDuration When PI-NRS Scores Were Greater Than (>) 5 - From 0 Hour to 4 Hours Post-dose8.2 MinutesStandard Deviation 12.1
Secondary

Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of PF-05089771

Time frame: Predose and 0.5, 2, 4, 6, and 24 hours post dose

Population: PK parameter analysis set included all participants who were randomized, received study medication, and had at least 1 of the PK parameters of interest in at least 1 treatment session.

ArmMeasureValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
Treatment Session 1: PF-05089771 1600 mgMaximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of PF-0508977166760 Nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 22
Treatment Session 1: PlaceboMaximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of PF-0508977159080 Nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 21
Secondary

Maximum PI-NRS Scores - From 0 Hour to 4 Hours Post-dose

Participants rated severity of their pain at 11 point PI-NRS, by choosing a number between 0 and 10. Where 0= no pain and 10= worst possible pain; higher scores signify more pain. Maximum pain score in 4 hours period post-dosing is reported.

Time frame: From 0 hour to 4 hours post-dose

Population: Full analysis set included all participants who successfully completed Part A, were randomized in Part B, and who received at least 1 dose of randomized study medication.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Treatment Session 1: PF-05089771 1600 mgMaximum PI-NRS Scores - From 0 Hour to 4 Hours Post-dose7.6 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.7
Treatment Session 1: PlaceboMaximum PI-NRS Scores - From 0 Hour to 4 Hours Post-dose8.0 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.4
Treatment Session 2: PF-05089771 1600 mgMaximum PI-NRS Scores - From 0 Hour to 4 Hours Post-dose8.2 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.1
Treatment Session 2: PlaceboMaximum PI-NRS Scores - From 0 Hour to 4 Hours Post-dose8.6 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.1
Secondary

Maximum PI-NRS Scores - From Post EP2 to 8 Hours Post-dose

Participants rated severity of their pain at 11 point PI-NRS, by choosing a number between 0 and 10. Where 0= no pain and 10= worst possible pain; higher scores signify more pain. Evoked pain time point 2= first time point post-dose when pain was evoked using the participant specific heat pain stimulus. EP2 is approximately a time point 4-5 hours post-dose. Maximum pain score in period from post EP2 to 8 hours post-dose is reported.

Time frame: From post EP2 to 8 hours post-dose

Population: Full analysis set included all participants who successfully completed Part A, were randomized in Part B, and who received at least 1 dose of randomized study medication. Overall Number of Participants Analyzed = participants evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Treatment Session 1: PF-05089771 1600 mgMaximum PI-NRS Scores - From Post EP2 to 8 Hours Post-dose3.5 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.7
Treatment Session 1: PlaceboMaximum PI-NRS Scores - From Post EP2 to 8 Hours Post-dose5.7 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.1
Treatment Session 2: PF-05089771 1600 mgMaximum PI-NRS Scores - From Post EP2 to 8 Hours Post-dose5.5 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.3
Treatment Session 2: PlaceboMaximum PI-NRS Scores - From Post EP2 to 8 Hours Post-dose7.8 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.9
Secondary

Maximum PI-NRS Scores - From Post EP3 to 10 Hours Post-dose

Participants rated severity of their pain at 11 point PI-NRS, by choosing a number between 0 and 10. Where 0= no pain and 10= worst possible pain; higher scores signify more pain. Evoked pain time point 3= second time point post-dose when pain was evoked using the participant specific heat pain stimulus. EP3 is approximately a time point 8-9 hours post-dose. Maximum pain score in period from post EP3 to 10 hours post-dose is reported.

Time frame: From the end of EP3 to 10 hours post dose

Population: Full analysis set included all participants who successfully completed Part A, were randomized in Part B, and who received at least 1 dose of randomized study medication. Overall Number of Participants Analyzed = participants evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Treatment Session 1: PF-05089771 1600 mgMaximum PI-NRS Scores - From Post EP3 to 10 Hours Post-dose2.3 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.6
Treatment Session 1: PlaceboMaximum PI-NRS Scores - From Post EP3 to 10 Hours Post-dose6.0 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.6
Treatment Session 2: PF-05089771 1600 mgMaximum PI-NRS Scores - From Post EP3 to 10 Hours Post-dose5.3 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.6
Treatment Session 2: PlaceboMaximum PI-NRS Scores - From Post EP3 to 10 Hours Post-dose8.3 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.1
Secondary

Maximum PI-NRS Scores - From Post EP4 to 28 Hours Post-dose

Participants rated severity of their pain at 11 point PI-NRS, by choosing a number between 0 and 10. Where 0= no pain and 10= worst possible pain; higher scores signify more pain. Evoked pain time point 4= third time point post-dose when pain was evoked using the participant specific heat pain stimulus. EP4 is approximately a time point 24-25 hours post-dose. Maximum pain score in period from post EP4 to 28 hours post-dose is reported.

Time frame: Post EP4, every 5 minutes for the first hour, then every 15 minutes up to 28 hours post-dose

Population: Full analysis set included all participants who successfully completed Part A, were randomized in Part B, and who received at least 1 dose of randomized study medication. Overall Number of Participants Analyzed = participants evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Treatment Session 1: PF-05089771 1600 mgMaximum PI-NRS Scores - From Post EP4 to 28 Hours Post-dose7.3 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.2
Treatment Session 1: PlaceboMaximum PI-NRS Scores - From Post EP4 to 28 Hours Post-dose7.3 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.5
Treatment Session 2: PF-05089771 1600 mgMaximum PI-NRS Scores - From Post EP4 to 28 Hours Post-dose5.7 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.1
Treatment Session 2: PlaceboMaximum PI-NRS Scores - From Post EP4 to 28 Hours Post-dose8.0 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2
Secondary

Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes From Baseline in Blood Pressure

Criteria for clinically significant blood pressure abnormalities: systolic blood pressure \>=30 millimetre of Mercury (mmHg) change from baseline in same posture, systolic blood pressure \<90 mmHg, diastolic blood pressure \>=20 mmHg change from baseline in same posture, diastolic blood pressure \<50 mmHg.

Time frame: Baseline up to a maximum of Day 83

Population: Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Treatment Session 1: PF-05089771 1600 mgNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes From Baseline in Blood Pressure0 Participants
Treatment Session 1: PlaceboNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes From Baseline in Blood Pressure0 Participants
Treatment Session 2: PF-05089771 1600 mgNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes From Baseline in Blood Pressure0 Participants
Treatment Session 2: PlaceboNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes From Baseline in Blood Pressure0 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes From Baseline in Core Body Temperature

The minimum starting temperature to measure core body temperature used was 33 degree Celsius. Clinically significant changes from baseline in core body temperature was judged by investigator.

Time frame: Baseline up to a maximum of Day 83

Population: Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Treatment Session 1: PF-05089771 1600 mgNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes From Baseline in Core Body Temperature0 Participants
Treatment Session 1: PlaceboNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes From Baseline in Core Body Temperature0 Participants
Treatment Session 2: PF-05089771 1600 mgNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes From Baseline in Core Body Temperature0 Participants
Treatment Session 2: PlaceboNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes From Baseline in Core Body Temperature0 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes From Baseline in Electrocardiogram (ECG)

Criteria for clinically significant abnormalities in ECG : PR interval \>=300 millisecond (msec) and 25 percent (%) increase when baseline \>200 msec, 50% increase when baseline less than or equal to (\<=) 200 msec; QRS interval \>=140 msec, \>=50% increase from baseline; QT interval \>=500 msec; QT interval corrected using the Fridericia formula (QTcF) 450 msec to \<480 msec, \>=480 msec, 30 to \<60 msec increase from baseline, \>=60 msec increase from baseline.

Time frame: Baseline up to a maximum of Day 83

Population: Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Treatment Session 1: PF-05089771 1600 mgNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes From Baseline in Electrocardiogram (ECG)0 Participants
Treatment Session 1: PlaceboNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes From Baseline in Electrocardiogram (ECG)0 Participants
Treatment Session 2: PF-05089771 1600 mgNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes From Baseline in Electrocardiogram (ECG)0 Participants
Treatment Session 2: PlaceboNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes From Baseline in Electrocardiogram (ECG)0 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities

Laboratory abnormalities: Hemoglobin (Hgb), hematocrit, red blood cell count: less than(\<)0.8\*lower limit of normal(LLN), platelet: \<0.5\*LLN/greater than (\>)1.75\*upper limit of normal (ULN), white blood cell: \<0.6\*LLN/\>1.5\*ULN, lymphocyte, neutrophil (absolute, %):\<0.8\*LLN/\>1.2\*ULN, total neutrophil \<0.8\*LLN;basophil, eosinophil, monocyte (absolute, %):\>1.2\*ULN; mean corpuscular (MC) volume, mean cell hemoglobin, MC hemoglobin concentration, mean platelet volume: \<0.9\*LLN/\>1.1\*ULN; total bilirubin \>1.5\*ULN, aspartate aminotransferase (AT), alanine AT, gammaglutamyl transferase, alkaline phosphatase:\> 3.0\*ULN, total protein, albumin: \<0.8\*LLN/\>1.2\*ULN; blood urea nitrogen, creatinine:\>1.3\*ULN, uric acid \>1.2\*ULN; sodium \<0.95\*LLN/\>1.05\*ULN, potassium, chloride, calcium, magnesium, bicarbonate: \<0.9\*LLN/\>1.1\*ULN; glucose \<0.6\*LLN/\>1.5\*ULN; urine (specific gravity \<1.003/\>1.030, pH \<4.5/\>8, glucose, ketone, protein, blood/Hgb, urobilinogen, bilirubin, nitrite, leukocyte esterase \>=1).

Time frame: Baseline up to a maximum of Day 73

Population: Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Treatment Session 1: PF-05089771 1600 mgNumber of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities2 Participants
Treatment Session 1: PlaceboNumber of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities2 Participants
Treatment Session 2: PF-05089771 1600 mgNumber of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities2 Participants
Treatment Session 2: PlaceboNumber of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities2 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Participant's Global Satisfaction Score

Participant was asked How would you rate the study medication you received for pain?. The participant was provided the following choices as an answer: excellent=4; good=3; fair=2; poor=1. Response to this question, was participant's overall impression (global evaluation) of the study medication at 4 hour post-dose or at time of first rescue treatment or medication, which ever occurred first.

Time frame: At 4 hour post-dose or at time of first rescue therapy, whichever occurred first

Population: Full analysis set included all participants who successfully completed Part A, were randomized in Part B, and who received at least 1 dose of randomized study medication.

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Treatment Session 1: PF-05089771 1600 mgNumber of Participants With Participant's Global Satisfaction ScorePoor Score1 Participants
Treatment Session 1: PF-05089771 1600 mgNumber of Participants With Participant's Global Satisfaction ScoreFair Score2 Participants
Treatment Session 1: PF-05089771 1600 mgNumber of Participants With Participant's Global Satisfaction ScoreGood Score1 Participants
Treatment Session 1: PF-05089771 1600 mgNumber of Participants With Participant's Global Satisfaction ScoreExcellent Score1 Participants
Treatment Session 1: PlaceboNumber of Participants With Participant's Global Satisfaction ScoreFair Score1 Participants
Treatment Session 1: PlaceboNumber of Participants With Participant's Global Satisfaction ScoreGood Score0 Participants
Treatment Session 1: PlaceboNumber of Participants With Participant's Global Satisfaction ScoreExcellent Score1 Participants
Treatment Session 1: PlaceboNumber of Participants With Participant's Global Satisfaction ScorePoor Score3 Participants
Treatment Session 2: PF-05089771 1600 mgNumber of Participants With Participant's Global Satisfaction ScoreGood Score1 Participants
Treatment Session 2: PF-05089771 1600 mgNumber of Participants With Participant's Global Satisfaction ScoreFair Score3 Participants
Treatment Session 2: PF-05089771 1600 mgNumber of Participants With Participant's Global Satisfaction ScoreExcellent Score1 Participants
Treatment Session 2: PF-05089771 1600 mgNumber of Participants With Participant's Global Satisfaction ScorePoor Score0 Participants
Treatment Session 2: PlaceboNumber of Participants With Participant's Global Satisfaction ScoreExcellent Score0 Participants
Treatment Session 2: PlaceboNumber of Participants With Participant's Global Satisfaction ScoreFair Score1 Participants
Treatment Session 2: PlaceboNumber of Participants With Participant's Global Satisfaction ScorePoor Score4 Participants
Treatment Session 2: PlaceboNumber of Participants With Participant's Global Satisfaction ScoreGood Score0 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)

An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. A treatment emergent AE was defined as an event that emerged during the treatment period that was absent before treatment, or worsened during the treatment period relative to the pretreatment state.

Time frame: Baseline up to a maximum of Day 83

Population: Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Treatment Session 1: PF-05089771 1600 mgNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)AEs5 Participants
Treatment Session 1: PF-05089771 1600 mgNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)SAEs0 Participants
Treatment Session 1: PlaceboNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)SAEs0 Participants
Treatment Session 1: PlaceboNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)AEs5 Participants
Treatment Session 2: PF-05089771 1600 mgNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)AEs5 Participants
Treatment Session 2: PF-05089771 1600 mgNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)SAEs0 Participants
Treatment Session 2: PlaceboNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)AEs4 Participants
Treatment Session 2: PlaceboNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)SAEs0 Participants
Secondary

Time to First Use of Rescue Therapy or Medication

Time to rescue medication (hour) was calculated as: date/time of rescue medication minus date/time of first dose for each period. If participant who did not receive rescue medication, the time of censoring was cut off at 24 hours or the time of withdrawal, whichever was earlier. Kaplan-Meier method was used for estimation.

Time frame: Up to maximum of 24 hours post-dose

Population: Full analysis set included all participants who successfully completed Part A, were randomized in Part B, and who received at least 1 dose of randomized study medication. Number of Participants Analyzed = number of participants evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Treatment Session 1: PF-05089771 1600 mgTime to First Use of Rescue Therapy or Medication14.9 Hours
Treatment Session 1: PlaceboTime to First Use of Rescue Therapy or Medication2.3 Hours
Treatment Session 2: PF-05089771 1600 mgTime to First Use of Rescue Therapy or Medication15.3 Hours
Treatment Session 2: PlaceboTime to First Use of Rescue Therapy or Medication10.3 Hours
p-value: 1Hierarchical rank test
p-value: 1Hierarchical rank test
Secondary

Time to Reach Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of PF-05089771

Time frame: Predose and 0.5, 2, 4, 6, and 24 hours post dose

Population: PK parameter analysis set included all participants who were randomized, received study medication, and had at least 1 of the PK parameters of interest in at least 1 treatment session.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Treatment Session 1: PF-05089771 1600 mgTime to Reach Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of PF-050897713.95 Hours
Treatment Session 1: PlaceboTime to Reach Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of PF-050897716.00 Hours

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026