Skip to content

Efficacy of Peripheral Nerve Stimulator in Assessing Sensory Nerve Block Level of Spinal Anesthesia

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01768780
Enrollment
58
Registered
2013-01-15
Start date
2012-12-31
Completion date
2020-05-31
Last updated
2019-03-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Orthopedic Surgery-lower Leg Surgery

Keywords

spinal anesthesia, peripheral nerve stimulator, sensory block level

Brief summary

Various methods are used to assess the level of anesthesia block after spinal anesthesia. Among them, ice cubes, alcohol swabs, and needles are commonly used in the clinical setting, but ice is limited by difficulties with management and transportation, and needle assessment has problems owing to the risk of pain, infection, and injury to the patient. Hence, the alcohol swab is commonly used in practice. However, the absence of pain is more important in the surgical process, and assessing the pain block level is more feasible in practice than assessing the sensory nerve block level using the alcohol swab. Therefore, it seems to be better to use the peripheral nerve stimulator for the accurate assessment of the pain block level. This has the advantage of continuous measurement of the block level, which can be used in a practical manner in conjunction with the surgical incision. Hence, the author compared the conventional method using the alcohol swab with the use of the peripheral nerve stimulator to determine which method is more practical in the measurement of spinal anesthesia block level.

Interventions

DEVICEthe anticholinergic glycopyrrolate 0.1 ㎎ + 0-15 mg hyperbaric bupivacaine

The study subjects were patients with planned orthopedic surgery on the infrapatellar area with spinal anesthesia, and 58 patients were recruited sequentially. A blood pressure machine, electrocardiogram, and pulse oximeter were connected to the patient in the operating room, and measurements were carried out every 5 minutes. Prior to the induction of anesthesia, the anticholinergic glycopyrrolate 0.1 ㎎ was intravenously administered after the confirmation of intravenous line opening status. For spinal anesthesia, the patient was arranged in the lateral recumbent position, and then the L 3-4 area was disinfected. Depending on the surgical region, height, and weight of each patient, 10-15 mg hyperbaric bupivacaine was administered through a 25 G needle.

Sponsors

Yonsei University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* The study subjects were adult patients, 20-65 years old, who were going to have orthopedic surgery on the infrapatellar area with spinal anesthesia planned and who fell under the American Society of Anesthesiologist physical status classifications of 1 or 2.

Exclusion criteria

* Patients who could not read or understand the consent materials or who had pregnancy, hypertension, diabetes, a defect in blood coagulation, cardiovascular disease, or administration of cardiovascular medications were excluded from the study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Efficacy of peripheral nerve stimulator as checking sensory block level after spinal anesthesiaChanges of sensory block level at 5 minutes, 10 minutes, 15 minutes, 20 minutes after pinal anesthesiaThe spinal anesthesia block levels were assessed and recorded using the alcohol swab and peripheral nerve stimulation, respectively.

Countries

South Korea

Contacts

Primary ContactKi-Young Lee, MD
KYLEE504@yuhs.ac02-2227-4224

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026