Skip to content

Efficacy of Osteopathic Manipulative Medicine (OMM) and Phototherapy for Patients With Chronic Lower Back Pain

Efficacy of Osteopathic Manipulative Medicine (OMM) and Phototherapy for Patients With Chronic Lower Back Pain

Status
Recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01765777
Enrollment
48
Registered
2013-01-10
Start date
2011-06-30
Completion date
2025-12-31
Last updated
2024-08-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Chronic Lower Back Pain

Keywords

Low back pain, Lower back pain, Chronic back pain

Brief summary

The purpose of the research study entitled Efficacy of Osteopathic Manipulative Medicine (OMM) and Phototherapy for Patients with Chronic Lower Back Pain is to investigate the hypothesis that combined treatment with both osteopathic manipulative medicine (OMM) and phototherapy will provide greater pain relief for patients with chronic lower back pain, as compared with standard medical management or either treatment alone.

Detailed description

The research has demonstrated separately that phototherapy and osteopathic manipulative medicine (OMM) are effective in reducing chronic low back pain, However there has not been any research to evaluate whether the interaction of the two treatment approaches together can provide enhanced pain relief. In A Meta-analysis of the Efficacy of Phototherapy in Tissue Repair, Fulop et.al.(1) from the Department of Physical Therapy, School of Health Professions, New York Institute of Technology (NYIT) concluded that phototherapy is a highly effective form of treatment for tissue repair, with stronger supporting evidence resulting from experimental animal studies than human studies (Fulop, p. 695, 699). Further review of the literature by Fulop et. al. (2) focused on the question of pain relief in relation to phototherapy, and the conclusion was that pain from various etiologies can be effectively relieved by phototherapy. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration has cleared biostimulation lasers (a.k.a. low level laser therapy \[LLLT\], cold lasers, soft lasers, or laser acupuncture devices) for marketing as adjunctive devices for the temporary relief of pain (3). Thus, both health practitioners and the lay public have access to and may potentially obtain and use phototherapy devices manufactured by various companies. Other research protocols by Gur, A et. al. (4) and Djavid, GE et. al. (5) evaluated patients with chronic low back pain in relation to the combined effectiveness of low level laser therapy and exercise. These studies showed positive results with the combined approaches. Osteopathic physicians utilize an approach to the treatment of patients called osteopathic manipulative medicine (OMM). The osteopathic physician will diagnose somatic dysfunction, and then treat the dysfunctions found with one or more of several OMM treatment approaches. The American Osteopathic Association (AOA) published in 2009 the Guidelines for Osteopathic Manipulative Treatment (OMT) for Patients with Low Back Pain. These guidelines are available both through the AOA and the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ), National Guideline Clearinghouse (6). This guideline (6) specifically addresses the efficacy of osteopathic manipulation treatment in reducing low back pain (p. 2). A review of the literature was performed, and after selection a total of six trials, involving eight osteopathic manipulative treatment (OMT) vs control treatment comparisons, were included in the meta-analysis (p. 2-3). The major recommendation stated in the guideline is that osteopathic manipulative treatment (OMT) be utilized by osteopathic physicians for musculoskeletal causes of back pain, i.e., to treat the diagnoses of somatic dysfunctions related to the low back pain (p.4). In addition, the meta-analysis performed did show that OMT for patients with low back pain led to statistically significant reduction in pain (p. 5). Thus, the potential for a complementary approach to patient care in cases of chronic low back pain exists. Yet, no studies to date have specifically evaluated this particular hypothesis regarding OMT and phototherapy for patients with chronic low back pain. The purpose of this research is to evaluate this question of enhanced combined efficacy for the overall benefit of patients.

Interventions

PROCEDUREPhototherapy

Sponsors

New York Institute of Technology
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age range: 18 - 65 years old * Subjects with constant or intermittent nonspecific lower back pain for a minimum of three (3) months duration.

Exclusion criteria

* Prospective subjects with a diagnosis of the following potential underlying causes of lower back pain: ankylosing spondylitis, cancer or a history of a histologically demonstrated malignant carcinoma, cauda equine syndrome, herniated disc, spinal fracture, or spinal osteomyelitis. * Prospective subjects who have undergone surgery of the lower back in the preceding three (3) months. * Prospective subjects who have received worker's compensation in the preceding three (3) months, or are involved in litigation involving concerns of lower back. * Prospective subjects who are pregnant. * Prospective subjects who have been a patient receiving any osteopathic manipulative medicine (OMM) treatment at the clinical trial site in the previous three (3) months, or on greater than three (3) occasions in the preceding year. * Prospective subjects who have ever been an employee at the clinical trial site. * Prospective subjects who have received spinal manipulation in the previous three (3) months, or on greater than three (3) occasions in the preceding year. * Prospective subjects who are currently involved in a physical therapy rehabilitation program. * Prospective subjects who have photosensitivity.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
10 cm visual analog scale for quantitative back pain8 weeksVAS Data collected at all visits
SF-36 Health Survey to measure Quality of Life8 weeksSF-36 survey data collected at 3 points
The Oswestry Back Questionnaire to measure qualitative back pain8 weeksOswestry questionnaire data collected at 3 points

Countries

United States

Contacts

Primary ContactPatricia S Kooyman, D.O.
pkooyman@nyit.edu516-686-1309
Backup ContactPeter Douris, PT,DPT, EdD
pdouris@nyit.edu516-686-7688

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026