Skip to content

An Evaluation of Sarilumab Plus Methotrexate Compared to Etanercept Plus Methotrexate in RA Patients Not Responding to Adalimumab Plus Methotrexate

A Randomized, Controlled Study of Sarilumab and Methotrexate (MTX) Versus Etanercept and MTX in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) and an Inadequate Response to 4 Months of Treatment With Adalimumab and MTX

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01764997
Acronym
RA-COMPARE
Enrollment
776
Registered
2013-01-10
Start date
2013-04-30
Completion date
2015-01-31
Last updated
2017-07-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Rheumatoid Arthritis

Brief summary

Primary Objective: To demonstrate the treatment effect of sarilumab and methotrexate (MTX) compared to etanercept and MTX in participants with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and an inadequate response to adalimumab and MTX by evaluation of the Disease Activity Score for 28 joints (DAS28). Secondary Objectives: To assess the signs and symptoms of RA in participants taking sarilumab in combination with MTX. To assess the quality of life of participants with RA taking sarilumab in combination with MTX. To assess the safety and tolerability of sarilumab in combination with MTX in participants with RA.

Detailed description

The maximum study duration per participant enrolled in the open label run-in phase and was eligible to enroll in the randomized phase of main study was 54 weeks: * open label screening period of up to 4 weeks * open-label treatment period of 16 weeks * randomized screening period of 2 to 4 weeks * randomized treatment post-treatment safety follow-up period of 6 weeks. The maximum study duration per participant enrolled only in the open label run-in phase and was not eligible to enroll in the randomized phase of main study was 26 weeks: * open label screening period of up to 4 weeks * open-label treatment period of 16 weeks * open label treatment post-treatment safety follow-up period of 6 weeks. The maximum study duration per participant enrolled in the open label run-in phase and was eligible to enroll in the sarilumab sub-study was 82 weeks: * open label screening period of up to 4 weeks * open-label treatment period of 16 weeks * screening period of 2 to 4 weeks * sarilumab treatment period of 52 weeks * sub-study post-treatment safety follow-up period of 6 weeks.

Interventions

DRUGSarilumab

Pharmaceutical form: Solution for injection in pre-filled syringe; Route of administration: Subcutaneous

DRUGEtanercept

Pharmaceutical form: Solution for injection in pre-filled syringe; Route of administration: Subcutaneous

DRUGMethotrexate

Dispensed according to local practice.

DRUGPlacebo (for etanercept)
DRUGAdalimumab

Pharmaceutical form: Solution for injection in pre-filled syringe; Route of administration: Subcutaneous

Sponsors

Regeneron Pharmaceuticals
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Sanofi
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Diagnosis of RA \>/= 3 months duration. * Continuous treatment of MTX 10 - 25 mg/week (or per local labeling requirements if the dose range differs) for at least 12 weeks before screening visit and on a stable dose for 8 weeks before screening visit. * Active disease defined as: at least 6/66 swollen and 8/68 tender joints and high sensitivity C-reactive protein \> 10 mg/L.

Exclusion criteria

* Age \< 18 years. * Use of parenteral corticosteroids or intra-articular corticosteroids within 4 weeks of the screening visit. * Use of oral corticosteroids in a dose higher than prednisone 10 mg or equivalent per day, or a change in dosage within 4 weeks of the screening visit. * Prior treatment with a tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha inhibitor, or other biological disease modifying anti-rheumatoid drug (DMARD) or Janus Kinase inhibitor. * New treatment with or dose-adjustment of on-going nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) or cyclo-oxygenase-2 (COX-2) inhibitors within 4 weeks of the screening visit. * Treatment with traditional oral DMARD /immunosuppressive agents other than MTX within 4 weeks or 12 weeks before the screening visit, depending on DMARD. The above information is not intended to contain all considerations relevant to a participant's potential participation in a clinical trial.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score for 28 Joints - C-Reactive Protein (DAS28-CRP) Score at Week 24Baseline, Week 24

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Number of Participants With at Least 20% Improvement in American College of Rheumatology (ACR20), at Least 50% Improvement in ACR (ACR50) and at Least 70% Improvement in ACR (ACR70) Efficacy Response Rates at Week 12 and Week 24Week 12 and Week 24
Percentage of Participants Achieving Clinical Remission Score (DAS28-CRP) <2.6 at Week 12 and Week 24Week 12 and Week 24
Change From Baseline in DAS28-CRP Score at Week 12Baseline, Week 12

Countries

Argentina, Australia, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Czechia, Ecuador, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Israel, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Malaysia, Mexico, New Zealand, Peru, Poland, Romania, Russia, South Africa, South Korea, Spain, Taiwan, Thailand, Ukraine, United Kingdom, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

The study was conducted at 228 sites in 31 countries. A total of 1949 participants were screened between 09 May 2013 and 07 Aug 2014 of which 1173 participants were screen failures and a total of 776 participants entered in the adalimumab run-in phase of the study.

Pre-assignment details

Of 776 participants, 365 completed adalimumab run-in phase, of whom 43 non-responders randomized (1:1:1) in double-blind fashion to receive sarilumab 150 mg, sarilumab 200 mg or etanercept 50 mg; 322 responders entered in open label sub-study. 373 participants did not proceed into randomized phase or sub-study and 38 discontinued from run-in phase.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Adalimumab Open Label run-in Treatment Only
Adalimumab 40 mg SC injection Q2W for 16 weeks added to stable dose of MTX during run-in period. Participants who were not randomized in the main study or did not enter the sub-study were included in this arm for safety assessment.
411
Etanercept + MTX (Randomized)
Etanercept 50 mg SC injection in combination with Placebo for sarilumab Q2W and etanercept 50 mg SC injection on alternating weeks for 24 weeks added to stable dose of MTX.
17
Sarilumab 150 mg + MTX (Randomized)
Sarilumab 150 mg SC injection in combination with placebo for etanercept Q2W and placebo for etanercept on alternating weeks for 24 weeks added to stable dose of MTX.
13
Sarilumab 200 mg + MTX (Randomized)
Sarilumab 200 mg SC injection in combination with placebo for etanercept Q2W and placebo for etanercept on alternating weeks for 24 weeks added to stable dose of MTX.
13
Sarilumab 150 mg + MTX Open Label Sub-study
Sarilumab 150 mg SC injection Q2W for 52 weeks added to stable dose of MTX.
322
Total776

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003FG004
Run-in PeriodAdverse Event150000
Run-in PeriodLack of Efficacy50000
Run-in PeriodOther than specified above170000
Run-in PeriodPoor compliance to protocol10000
Study Drug Treatment PeriodAdverse Event010024
Study Drug Treatment PeriodLack of Efficacy00002
Study Drug Treatment PeriodOther than specified above000010

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicSarilumab 150 mg + MTX (Randomized)Sarilumab 200 mg + MTX (Randomized)Adalimumab Open Label run-in Treatment OnlyEtanercept + MTX (Randomized)Sarilumab 150 mg + MTX Open Label Sub-studyTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
3 Participants3 Participants51 Participants3 Participants48 Participants108 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
10 Participants10 Participants360 Participants14 Participants274 Participants668 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
10 Participants9 Participants342 Participants15 Participants261 Participants637 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
3 Participants4 Participants69 Participants2 Participants61 Participants139 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
EG004
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
132 / 7767 / 177 / 138 / 13104 / 322
serious
Total, serious adverse events
25 / 7762 / 170 / 130 / 1311 / 322

Outcome results

Primary

Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score for 28 Joints - C-Reactive Protein (DAS28-CRP) Score at Week 24

Time frame: Baseline, Week 24

Population: As the number of participants randomized fell well below target (43 vs. 699), the efficacy data were not systematically collected or cleaned and no datasets have been created to report.

Secondary

Change From Baseline in DAS28-CRP Score at Week 12

Time frame: Baseline, Week 12

Population: As the number of participants randomized fell well below target (43 vs. 699), the efficacy data were not systematically collected or cleaned and no datasets have been created to report.

Secondary

Number of Participants With at Least 20% Improvement in American College of Rheumatology (ACR20), at Least 50% Improvement in ACR (ACR50) and at Least 70% Improvement in ACR (ACR70) Efficacy Response Rates at Week 12 and Week 24

Time frame: Week 12 and Week 24

Population: As the number of participants randomized fell well below target (43 vs. 699), the efficacy data were not systematically collected or cleaned and no datasets have been created to report.

Secondary

Percentage of Participants Achieving Clinical Remission Score (DAS28-CRP) <2.6 at Week 12 and Week 24

Time frame: Week 12 and Week 24

Population: As the number of participants randomized fell well below target (43 vs. 699), the efficacy data were not systematically collected or cleaned and no datasets have been created to report.

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026