Skip to content

Stereotactic Radiation Therapy for Pediatric Sarcomas

A Phase II Study of Hyperfractionated Stereotactic Radiotherapy in the Treatment of Metastatic Pediatric Sarcomas of Bony Sites

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01763970
Enrollment
14
Registered
2013-01-09
Start date
2013-11-30
Completion date
2020-04-30
Last updated
2020-08-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Bony Sites, Metastatic Disease, Sarcoma

Keywords

Stereotactic, Radiotherapy, Hypofractionated

Brief summary

The stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) literature focuses on clinical outcomes in the adult population. However, SBRT has a particularly strong rationale for application in pediatrics given that high biologically effective doses have been shown to increase control in histologies, such as sarcoma, which are common in the pediatrics population. With stereotactic radiation therapy techniques, a reduction in normal tissue dose surrounding the target lesion of interest may also be accomplished resulting in lower toxicity. Given that pediatric patients with sarcomas, presenting with limited metastases in lung and bone, are still considered to be a curable population with aggressive local therapy, SBRT could have a significant impact on outcomes in oligometastatic patients who may be otherwise unresectable.

Detailed description

Pediatric patients with sarcoma who have limited metastases are still potentially curable with aggressive local therapy. However, conventional moderate dose radiation is unlikely to provide durable local control. Given the recent technologic advances in radiation delivery, it is now possible to deliver tumoricidal doses, using stereotactic radiation over a short time course with highly focal techniques. Stereotactic radiation has proven efficacious in the intracranial setting and in multiple extracranial sites in adults. It has not yet been well studied in the pediatrics population where there is a particularly strong rationale due to the ablative doses that can be delivered to tumor while simultaneously reducing high dose to normal tissues. The proposed trial is a single arm phase II study to determine the efficacy of SBRT in pediatric sarcomas with surgically unresectable metastatic disease. Oligometastatic sites eligible for treatment in this study include bony sites of disease. SBRT will be delivered to each eligible site to a total dose of 4000 delivered in 5 fractions of 800 per fractions each day. Following completion of SBRT, patients will undergo treatment response assessment with the use of diagnostic imaging, clinical examination, and completion of the Brief Pain Inventory to assess quality of life. The primary objective of this study is to determine the efficacy of SBRT delivered to a dose of 4000 centigray (cGy) in 5 fractions of 800 cGy each for patients greater than 3 years of age and \< 40 years of age with metastatic disease of bone secondary to pediatric sarcoma. The secondary objectives of this study include describing the toxicity of SBRT with this regimen; assessing clinical response rate of each target lesion; assessing long-term clinical outcomes; and assessing quality of life following completion of treatment. For patients with potentially curable oligometastatic disease, surgical resection in conjunction with systemic therapy remains the standard of care. Patients on this study will continue to receive chemotherapy outside of the 2 week window for SBRT. Issues that may limit participation include our inability to assess late effects that may not develop till at least 10 years after therapy. For this reason, we will limit the population in this study to patients who are surgically unresectable and would be otherwise incurable with current standard systemic therapies.

Interventions

RADIATIONSBRT

Sponsors

Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
4 Years to 40 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* histologically or cytologically confirmed metastatic sarcoma of the soft tissue or bone * must have measurable disease * disease must be surgically unresectable as determined by a tumor board or surgeon * greater than 3 years of age * less than or equal to 40 years of age * life expectancy of at least 9 months * adequate performance status (Lansky Performance Status greater than or equal to 50). * ability to understand and willingness to sign informed consent document

Exclusion criteria

* patients who have had chemotherapy or radiotherapy within 2 weeks prior to entering the study * patients who have had any prior radiotherapy to the treatment site(s) * patients may not participate on any other treatment protocol while they are receiving treatment on this protocol and for up to 3 months after these protocol treatments have ended * pregnant women * refusal of women of child bearing potential to take a pregnancy test prior to treatment

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Lesion-specific Local Control at 6 Months Post-SBRT as Assessed by Percentage of Lesions Locally Controlled6 months post-SBRTLocal control was defined as the absence of local progression. Local progression was defined as: * (1) the development of a new soft tissue mass ≥1 cm at a site without a soft tissue component or with a soft tissue component \<1 cm in at baseline * (2) an increase in the largest axial dimension of the soft tissue component by \>20% in lesions with a ≥ 1 cm in soft tissue component at baseline * (3) a previous bone metastasis that was avid on fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-positron emission tomography (PET), became non-avid after SBRT, and then became avid again. The Kaplan-Meier method was used.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Patient-specific Local Control at 6 Months Post-SBRT as Assessed by the Percentage of Patients Locally Controlled6 months post-SBRTPatient-specific local control was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method from initiation of SBRT to time of local failure. Patients who did not experience local failure were censored at the time of last follow up.
Percentage of Patients With Progression-free Survival at 6 Months Post-SBRT6 months post-SBRTTo assess long-term clinical outcomes of this patient population after completion of SBRT by measuring progression-free survival. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to determine progression-free for survival from initiation of SBRT to progression (local or distant) or death due to any cause. Patients that did not have evidence of progression or who did not die, where censored at the time of last follow up.
Percentage of Patients With Overall Survival at 6 Months Post-SBRT6 months post-SBRTThe Kaplan-Meier method was used to calculate overall survival from initiation of SBRT to death due to any cause. Patients who had not died at the time of the analysis were censored at the time of last follow up.
Change in Quality of Life (QoL) as Assessed by the Brief Pain InventoryBaseline and one-month post-SBRTQuality of life was assessed using the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) form which assesses the severity of pain and impact on functioning on an 11-point scale at each follow up visit. Paired sample Wilcoxon signed-rank tests were performed to assess changes in pain scores on the Brief Pain Inventory; 0 being no pain and 10 being the worst pain.
Number of Participants Experiencing Toxicity of SBRT12 months after treatment startsTo describe the toxicity of SBRT delivered to study patients measured by the NCI Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Hypofractionated SBRT
800 delivered in 5 fractions every day to total dose of 4000 SBRT: 800 delivered in 5 fractions every day to total dose of 4000
14
Total14

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicHypofractionated SBRT
Age, Continuous17 years
Consolidation of Metastatic Disease
Partial
6 Participants
Consolidation of Metastatic Disease
Total
8 Participants
Histological type of cancer
Ewing sarcoma
7 Participants
Histological type of cancer
Osteosarcoma
3 Participants
Histological type of cancer
Soft-tissue sarcoma
4 Participants
Lansky Play-Performance Scale (LPS) for Pediatric Functional Status
LPS = 100
3 Participants
Lansky Play-Performance Scale (LPS) for Pediatric Functional Status
LPS < 70
0 Participants
Lansky Play-Performance Scale (LPS) for Pediatric Functional Status
LPS = 70
1 Participants
Lansky Play-Performance Scale (LPS) for Pediatric Functional Status
LPS = 80-90
10 Participants
Number of Lesions Treated in Each Patient2.5 lesions
Pain at baseline
No pain
8 Participants
Pain at baseline
Yes, has pain
6 Participants
Prior systemic therapy14 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Caucasian
9 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Non-Caucasian
5 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
14 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
9 Participants
Treatment Duration7 days

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
8 / 14
other
Total, other adverse events
8 / 14
serious
Total, serious adverse events
2 / 14

Outcome results

Primary

Lesion-specific Local Control at 6 Months Post-SBRT as Assessed by Percentage of Lesions Locally Controlled

Local control was defined as the absence of local progression. Local progression was defined as: * (1) the development of a new soft tissue mass ≥1 cm at a site without a soft tissue component or with a soft tissue component \<1 cm in at baseline * (2) an increase in the largest axial dimension of the soft tissue component by \>20% in lesions with a ≥ 1 cm in soft tissue component at baseline * (3) a previous bone metastasis that was avid on fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-positron emission tomography (PET), became non-avid after SBRT, and then became avid again. The Kaplan-Meier method was used.

Time frame: 6 months post-SBRT

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Hypofractionated SBRTLesion-specific Local Control at 6 Months Post-SBRT as Assessed by Percentage of Lesions Locally Controlled95 percentage of lesions
Secondary

Change in Quality of Life (QoL) as Assessed by the Brief Pain Inventory

Quality of life was assessed using the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) form which assesses the severity of pain and impact on functioning on an 11-point scale at each follow up visit. Paired sample Wilcoxon signed-rank tests were performed to assess changes in pain scores on the Brief Pain Inventory; 0 being no pain and 10 being the worst pain.

Time frame: Baseline and one-month post-SBRT

Population: BPI forms were completed for 10 patients at baseline and one-month post-SBRT.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Hypofractionated SBRTChange in Quality of Life (QoL) as Assessed by the Brief Pain InventoryBaseline2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.4
Hypofractionated SBRTChange in Quality of Life (QoL) as Assessed by the Brief Pain InventoryOne month2.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.8
Secondary

Number of Participants Experiencing Toxicity of SBRT

To describe the toxicity of SBRT delivered to study patients measured by the NCI Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0

Time frame: 12 months after treatment starts

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Hypofractionated SBRTNumber of Participants Experiencing Toxicity of SBRT9 Participants
Secondary

Patient-specific Local Control at 6 Months Post-SBRT as Assessed by the Percentage of Patients Locally Controlled

Patient-specific local control was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method from initiation of SBRT to time of local failure. Patients who did not experience local failure were censored at the time of last follow up.

Time frame: 6 months post-SBRT

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Hypofractionated SBRTPatient-specific Local Control at 6 Months Post-SBRT as Assessed by the Percentage of Patients Locally Controlled89 percentage of patients
Secondary

Percentage of Patients With Overall Survival at 6 Months Post-SBRT

The Kaplan-Meier method was used to calculate overall survival from initiation of SBRT to death due to any cause. Patients who had not died at the time of the analysis were censored at the time of last follow up.

Time frame: 6 months post-SBRT

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Hypofractionated SBRTPercentage of Patients With Overall Survival at 6 Months Post-SBRT100 percentage of patients
Secondary

Percentage of Patients With Progression-free Survival at 6 Months Post-SBRT

To assess long-term clinical outcomes of this patient population after completion of SBRT by measuring progression-free survival. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to determine progression-free for survival from initiation of SBRT to progression (local or distant) or death due to any cause. Patients that did not have evidence of progression or who did not die, where censored at the time of last follow up.

Time frame: 6 months post-SBRT

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Hypofractionated SBRTPercentage of Patients With Progression-free Survival at 6 Months Post-SBRT50 percentage of patients
Post Hoc

Overall Survival by Consolidation Status

The Kaplan-Meier method was used to calculate overall survival (in months) stratified by consolidation status (total consolidation vs. partial consolidation) from initiation of SBRT to death due to any cause.

Time frame: 3 years post-SBRT

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Hypofractionated SBRTOverall Survival by Consolidation Status12.7 months
Total ConsolidationOverall Survival by Consolidation StatusNA months
Post Hoc

Progression-Free Survival by Consolidation Status

The Kaplan-Meier method was used to calculate progression-free survival (in months) stratified by consolidation status (total consolidation vs. partial consolidation) from initiation of SBRT to progression (local or distant) or death due to any cause.

Time frame: 3 years post-SBRT

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Hypofractionated SBRTProgression-Free Survival by Consolidation Status3.7 months
Total ConsolidationProgression-Free Survival by Consolidation Status9.3 months

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026