Metastatic or Unresectable Cutaneous Melanoma
Conditions
Keywords
Melanoma, Cutaneous melanoma, Skin disease, Skin cancer, Skin Neoplasms, Neoplasm Metastasis
Brief summary
Two-arm, randomized, prospective, open-label, multi-center, phase III study to compare the efficacy and safety of MEK162 (45 mg BID) versus dacarbazine (1000 mg/m2 IV every 3 weeks) in patients with advanced (Stage IIIC) unresectable or metastatic (Stage IV) NRAS Q61 mutation-positive cutaneous or unknown primary melanoma. The mutation analysis will be performed at a central laboratory. Only those patients with Q61 mutation per central laboratory and meet all eligibility criteria will be randomized. A total of 393 patients will be randomized 2:1 to receive either MEK162 or dacarbazine. Patients will be stratified according to AJCC stage (IIIC, IVM1a, and IVM1b versus IVM1c), ECOG Performance status (0 versus 1) and any prior number of lines of immunotherapy (immunotherapies versus none). This study will use an Interactive Response Technology (IRT). The primary end point of the study is progression-free survival. Key secondary end point is overall survival
Interventions
MEK162 will be administered as a fixed dose of 45 mg (3 x 15 mg tablets) BID, with a glass of water and taken with or without food.
Patients randomized to dacarbazine will receive an IV infusion of dacarbazine 1000 mg/m2 over the course of 1 hour on day 1 and then every three weeks.
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Diagnosis of locally advanced, unresectable or metastatic cutaneous or melanoma of unknown primary AJCC Stage IIIC or IV (uveal and mucosal melanoma are excluded) * Presence of NRAS Q61 mutation in tumor tissue prior to randomization as determined by a Novartis designated central laboratory * Naïve untreated patients or patients who have progressed on or after any number of prior lines of immunotherapy for unresectable locally advanced or metastatic melanoma * Evidence of at least one measurable lesion as detected by radiological or photographic methods * Adequate bone marrow, organ function, cardiac and laboratory parameters * Normal functioning of daily living activities
Exclusion criteria
* Any untreated CNS metastases * Uveal or mucosal melanoma * History of or current evidence of retinal vein occlusion (RVO) or risk factors of RVO * Patients with washout period \< 6 weeks from the last dose of ipilimumab or other immunotherapy. * Previous systemic chemotherapy for unresectable locally advanced or metastatic melanoma. * History of Gilbert's syndrome * Prior therapy with a MEK- inhibitor * Impaired cardiovascular function or clinically significant cardiovascular diseases * Uncontrolled arterial hypertension despite medical treatment * HIV positive or active Hepatitis A or B * Impairment of gastrointestinal function * Patients who have undergone major surgery or radiotherapy ≤ 3 weeks prior to starting study drug or who have not recovered from side effects of such procedure; * Patients with neuromuscular disorders that are associated with elevated CK. * Pregnant or nursing (lactating) women * Medical, psychiatric, cognitive or other conditions that may compromise the patient's ability to understand the patient information, give informed consent, comply with the study protocol or complete the study Other protocol-defined inclusion/
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Progression-Free Survival (PFS) by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) v1.1 | From the date of randomization to the date of the first documented PD or death, whichever occurred first (maximum up to 77 weeks for binimetinib arm; maximum up to 61 weeks for dacarbazine arm) | PFS: time from randomization to first documented PD or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. RECIST 1.1, PD: \>=20% increase in sum of diameter of target lesions (TLs) taking as reference the smallest sum on study (including baseline sum), sum must also be an absolute increase of \>=5 mm; unequivocal progression of existing non-TLs; appearance of \>=1 lesion. Complete response (CR): disappearance of all lesions; any pathological lymph nodes (TLs) or non-pathological (non-TLs) must have reduction in short axis to \<10 mm; normalization of tumor marker level for non-TLs. Partial response (PR): \>=30% decrease in sum of diameter of all TLs, referring baseline sum of diameters. Stable disease (SD): neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor increase in lesions qualified for PD referring smallest sum diameter. With no event at time of analysis cut-off or at start of any new anti-neoplastic therapy, PFS censored at date of last adequate tumor assessment of CR, PR or SD. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Overall Response Rate (ORR) | From date of randomization until first documented response of CR or PR (maximum up to 77 weeks for binimetinib arm; maximum up to 61 weeks for dacarbazine arm) | ORR: percentage of participants with best overall response (BOR) of CR or PR. BOR: best response recorded from start of treatment until CR or PR. RECIST V1.1, a) CR: disappearance of all lesions; any pathological lymph nodes (TLs) or non-pathological (non-TLs) must have reduction in short axis to \<10 mm; normalization of tumor marker level for non-TLs; b) PR: \>=30% decrease in sum of diameter of all TLs, taking as reference baseline sum of diameters. ORR is reported for confirmed and unconfirmed responses. Confirmed CR or PR = at least 2 determinations of CR or PR at least 4 weeks apart before PD. PD: \>=20% increase in sum of diameter of all measured target lesions, taking as reference smallest sum of diameter of all TLs recorded at or after baseline, sum must also be absolute increase of \>=5 mm. Unequivocal progression of existing non TLs. Appearance of at least 1 new lesion. |
| Time to Response (TTR) | From date of randomization until first documented response of CR or PR (maximum up to 77 weeks for binimetinib arm; maximum up to 61 weeks for dacarbazine arm) | TTR: time between date of randomization until first documented response of CR or PR. RECIST V1.1, a) CR: disappearance of all lesions; any pathological lymph nodes (TLs) or non-pathological (non-TLs) must have reduction in short axis to \<10 mm; normalization of tumor marker level for non-TLs; b) PR: \>=30% decrease in sum of diameter (dia) of all TLs, referring baseline sum of dia; c) PD: \>=20% increase in sum of diameter of all measured TLs taking as reference smallest sum of diameter of all TLs recorded at or after baseline, sum must also be absolute increase of \>=5 mm. Unequivocal progression of existing non-TLs. Appearance of \>=1 new lesion. Participants who did not achieve PR or CR censored at last adequate tumor assessment date when they did not have PFS event (time from date of randomization to date of first documented PD or death due to any cause, whichever occur first) or at maximum follow-up when they had PFS event. |
| Duration of Objective Response (DOR) | From the date of first documented response (CR or PR) to the first documented progression or death (maximum up to 77 weeks for binimetinib arm; maximum up to 61 weeks for dacarbazine arm) | DOR: time from date of first documented response (CR or PR) to first documented progression or death due to underlying cancer. RECIST V1.1, a) CR: disappearance of all lesions; any pathological lymph nodes (TLs) or non-pathological (non-TLs) must have reduction in short axis to \<10 mm; normalization of tumor marker level for non-TLs; b) PR: \>=30% decrease in sum of diameter (dia) of all TLs, referring baseline sum of dia; c) PD: \>=20% increase in sum of diameter of all measured target lesions taking as reference smallest sum of diameter of all target lesions recorded at or after baseline, sum must also be absolute increase of \>=5 mm. Unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. Appearance of at least 1 new lesion. If a participant with a CR or PR had no PD or death due to underlying cancer, participants was censored at date of last adequate tumor assessment. |
| Disease Control Rate (DCR) | From date of randomization until first documented response of CR, PR, SD or non-CR/non-PD (maximum up to 77 weeks for binimetinib arm; maximum up to 61 weeks for dacarbazine arm) | DCR was calculated as the percentage of participants with a BOR of CR, PR, SD RECIST V1.1, a) CR: disappearance of all lesions; any pathological lymph nodes (TLs) or non-pathological (non-TLs) must have reduction in short axis to \<10 mm; normalization of tumor marker level for non-TLs; b) PR: \>=30% decrease in sum of diameter of all target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters; c) SD: neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR or CR nor an increase in lesions which would qualify for PD taking as reference the smallest sum diameters; d) PD: \>=20% increase in sum of diameter of all measured target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum of diameter of all target lesions recorded at or after baseline, sum must also be absolute increase of \>=5 mm. Unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. Appearance of at least 1 new lesion. |
| Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) | From baseline up to 219.4 weeks for binimetinib arm; From baseline up to 123.9 weeks for dacarbazine arm | An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship with the study treatment. SAE was defined as one of the following: was fatal or life-threatening; resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity; constituted a congenital anomaly/birth defect; was medically significant; required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization. Treatment-emergent AE was defined as an AE with onset date occurring during the on-treatment period. AEs included all SAEs and non-SAEs. |
| Number of Participants With Clinically Notable Hematology Shifts Based on National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria (NCI-CTCAE) Grade, Version 4.03 | From baseline up to 77 weeks in binimetinib arm; From baseline up to 61 weeks for dacarbazine arm | Clinically notable shifts are defined as worsening by at least 2 grades or to \>= grade 3. Severity was graded as Grade 1: asymptomatic or mild symptoms, clinical or diagnostic observations only, intervention not indicated; Grade 2: moderate, minimal, local or noninvasive intervention indicated, limiting age-appropriate instrumental activities of daily life (ADL); Grade 3: severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening, hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization indicated, disabling, limiting self-care ADL; Grade 4: life-threatening consequence, urgent intervention indicated; Grade 5: death related to AE. |
| Number of Participants With Clinically Notable Clinical Chemistry/Biochemistry Shifts Based on NCI-CTCAE Grade, Version 4.03 | From baseline up to 77 weeks in binimetinib arm; From baseline up to 61 weeks for dacarbazine arm | Clinically notable shifts are defined as worsening by at least 2 grades or to \>= grade 3. Severity was graded as Grade 1: asymptomatic or mild symptoms, clinical or diagnostic observations only, intervention not indicated; Grade 2: moderate, minimal, local or noninvasive intervention indicated, limiting age-appropriate instrumental ADL; Grade 3: severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening, hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization indicated, disabling, limiting self-care ADL; Grade 4: life-threatening consequence, urgent intervention indicated; Grade 5: death related to AE. |
| Number of Participants With Clinically Notable Vital Signs | From baseline up to 77 weeks in binimetinib arm; From baseline up to 61 weeks for dacarbazine arm | Abnormalities criteria included: low/high pulse rate (beats per minute \[bpm\]):\<=50bpm with decrease from baseline \>=15bpm/\>=120bpm with increase from baseline \>=15bpm; Low/high systolic blood pressure (millimeters of mercury \[mmHg\]): \<=90mmHg with decrease from baseline \>=20mmHg/\>=160mmHg with increase from baseline \>=20mmHg; Low/high diastolic blood pressure \[mmHg\]: \<=50mmHg with decrease from baseline \>=15mmHg/\>=100mmHg with increase from baseline \>=15mmHg; Low/high body weight (kilogram \[kg\]): \>=20% decrease from baseline / \>=10% increase from baseline; Low/high body temperature (degree Celsius \[°C\]): \<=36°C / \>= 37.5°C |
| Number of Participants With Notable Electrocardiogram (ECG) Values | From baseline up to 77 weeks in binimetinib arm; From baseline up to 61 weeks for dacarbazine arm | Criteria for notable ECG values were as follow: QT interval (in millisecond \[msec\]) new (newly occurring post-baseline value) greater than (\>) 450, 480, 500, increase from baseline \>30, increase from baseline \>60; corrected QT interval by Fredericia formula (QTcF) in msec new (newly occurring post-baseline value) \> 450, 480, 500, increase from baseline \>30, increase from baseline \>60; corrected QT interval by Bazett's formula (QTcB) in msec new (newly occurring post-baseline value) \> 450, 480, 500, increase from baseline \>30, increase from baseline \>60; heart rate in bpm new (newly occurring post-baseline value) \<60 and \>100. |
| Overall Survival (OS) | From the date of randomization to the date of death (maximum up to 107 weeks for binimetinib arm; maximum up to 88 weeks for dacarbazine arm) | Overall survival was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of death due to any cause. If a participant was not known to have died, overall survival was censored at the date of last known date participant alive. |
| Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Findings in Physical Examination | From baseline up to 77 weeks in binimetinib arm; From baseline up to 61 weeks for dacarbazine arm | A complete physical examination included the examination of general appearance, skin, neck (including thyroid), eyes, ears, nose, throat, lungs, heart, abdomen, back, lymph nodes, extremities, vascular and neurological systems. If indicated based on medical history and/or symptoms, rectal, external genitalia, breast, and pelvic examinations were performed. Clinical significance in physical examination was reported as adverse events. |
| Number of Participants With Adverse Events of Special Interest: Ocular Events | From baseline up to 77 weeks in binimetinib arm; From baseline up to 61 weeks for dacarbazine arm | An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship with the study treatment. Grade 1: Asymptomatic or mild symptoms; clinical or diagnostic observations only; intervention not indicated; Grade 2: Moderate; minimal, local or noninvasive intervention indicated; limiting age appropriate instrumental ADL; Grade 3: Severe or medically significant but not immediately sight threatening; Hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization indicated; disabling; limiting self-care ADL; Grade 4: Sight-threatening consequences; urgent intervention indicated; blindness (20/200 or worse) in the affected eye. Here, in this outcome measure data is reported for events falling in any of the grades. |
| Plasma Concentration of Binimetinib | Day 1 of Week 1: Pre-dose, 1, 1.5, 2, 10 hours post-dose; Day 1 of Weeks 4, 7: Pre-dose, 1.5 hours post-dose; Day 1 of Weeks 10, 13: Pre-dose | — |
| Time to Definitive 10% Deterioration in Global Health Status Score of European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (QLQ-C30) | From baseline up to 77 weeks in binimetinib arm; From baseline up to 61 weeks for dacarbazine arm | The time to definitive 10% deterioration was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of event, which was defined as death due to any cause or at least 10% worsening of the corresponding scale score, relative to baseline, with no later improvement above this threshold observed during the course of the study or death due to any cause. If a participant had no event prior to analysis cut-off or start of another anticancer therapy, time to deterioration was censored at the date of the last adequate health related quality of life (HRQoL) evaluation. EORTC QLQ-C30: 5 functional scales (physical, role, cognitive, emotional, and social), a global health status scale, 3 symptom scales (nausea/vomiting, pain, fatigue) and 6 single items (dyspnea, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea and financial difficulties). All scales and single-item measures range =0 to 100. High score for global health status = high quality of life. |
| Change From Baseline in Global Health Status Score of EORTC QLQ-C30 at Weeks 4, 7, 13, 19, 25, 34, 43, 52, 61, 70, End of Treatment, Safety Follow-up Visit, Post-Treatment Follow-up Visit 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 | Both arms: Baseline, Day 1 Treatment Week (TW) 4,7,13,19,25,34,43,52; Post-treatment follow-up Visit (FUV) 1 to 6; Binimetinib: Day 1 TW61,70; End of treatment (EOT= TW73); Safety FUV=30 days post TW73; Dacarbazine: EOT=TW 57;Safety FUV=30 days post TW57 | EORTC QLQ-C30: 5 functional scales (physical, role, cognitive, emotional, and social), a h global health status scale, 3 symptom scales (nausea/vomiting, pain, fatigue) and 6 single items (dyspnea, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea and financial difficulties). All scales and single-item measures range =0 to 100. High score for global health status = high quality of life. Post-treatment tumor assessments follow up visits occurred at every 9 weeks if participants started new anticancer therapy. |
| Change From Baseline in EuroQoL-5 Dimensions- 5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L) Index Score at Weeks 4, 7, 13, 19, 25, 34, 43, 52, 61, 70, End of Treatment, Safety Follow-up Visit, Post-treatment Follow-up Visit 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 | Both arms: Baseline, Day 1 Treatment Week (TW) 4,7,13,19,25,34,43,52; Post-treatment follow-up Visit (FUV) 1 to 6; Binimetinib: Day 1 TW61,70; End of treatment (EOT= TW73); Safety FUV=30 days post TW73; Dacarbazine: EOT=TW 57;Safety FUV=30 days post TW57 | EQ-5D-5L, is a standardized measure of health utility that provides a single index value for one's health status. EQ-5D-5L contained 1 item for each of 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 5 levels: 1= no problems, 2= slight problems, 3= moderate problems, 4= severe problems, and 5= extreme problems. Index score: participant responses to the 5 dimensions reflected a specific health state that corresponded to a population preference weight for that state on a continuous scale of 0 (death) to 1 (perfect health). Higher index scores = better health state. Post-treatment tumor assessments follow up visits occurred at every 9 weeks if participants started new anticancer therapy. |
| Time to Definitive 1 Point Deterioration in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS) | From baseline up to 73 weeks 3 days for binimetinib arm; From baseline up to 57 weeks 3 days for dacarbazine arm | ECOG PS was used to assess the physical health of participants, and ranged from 0 (most active) to 5 (dead). ECOG PS grades: 0= fully active, able to carry on all pre-disease performance without restriction, 1= restricted in physically strenuous activity but ambulatory and able to carry out work of a light or sedentary nature, e.g., light house work, office work, 2= ambulatory and capable of all self-care but unable to carry out any work activities. Up and about more than 50% of waking hours, 3= capable of only limited self-care, confined to bed or chair more than 50% of waking hours, 4=completely disabled. cannot carry on any selfcare. Totally confined to bed or chair and 5= dead. Definitive deterioration is defined as on treatment death due to any cause or decrease in ECOG PS by at least one category from baseline score. |
| Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS) | For both arms: Baseline, Weeks 4, 7, 10, 13, 16, 19, 22, 25, 28, 31, 34, 37, 40, 43, 46, 49, 52, 55 and 30-day Follow-up For binimetinib only: Weeks 58, 61, 64, 67, 70, 73 | ECOG PS was used to assess the physical health of participants, and ranged from 0 (most active) to 5 (dead). ECOG PS grades: 0= fully active, able to carry on all pre-disease performance without restriction, 1= restricted in physically strenuous activity but ambulatory and able to carry out work of a light or sedentary nature, e.g., light house work, office work, 2= ambulatory and capable of all self-care but unable to carry out any work activities. Up and about more than 50% of waking hours, 3= capable of only limited self-care, 4=completely disabled. cannot carry on any selfcare. Totally confined to bed or chair confined to bed or chair more than 50% of waking hours and 5= dead. Post-treatment tumor assessments follow up visits occurred at every 9 weeks if participants started new anticancer therapy. |
| Number of Participants With Neuroblastoma RAS Viral (V-ras) Oncogene Homolog (NRAS) Mutation Status at Baseline | Baseline | Number of participants with NRAS mutation status at baseline were reported. |
| Number of Participants With Adverse Events of Special Interest: Cardiac Events | From baseline up to 77 weeks in binimetinib arm; From baseline up to 61 weeks for dacarbazine arm | An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship with the study treatment. Grade 1: asymptomatic or mild symptoms, clinical or diagnostic observations only, intervention not indicated; Grade 2: moderate, minimal, local or noninvasive intervention indicated, limiting age-appropriate instrumental activities of daily life (ADL); Grade 3: severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening, hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization indicated, disabling, limiting self-care ADL; Grade 4: life-threatening consequence, urgent intervention indicated; Grade 5: death related to AE. Here, in this outcome measure data is reported for events falling in any of the grades. |
Countries
Argentina, Australia, Austria, Belgium, Brazil, Canada, Czechia, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Israel, Italy, Japan, Netherlands, Poland, Portugal, Russia, Slovakia, South Africa, South Korea, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey (Türkiye), United Kingdom, United States
Participant flow
Recruitment details
Participants randomized were with previously untreated, advanced unresectable or metastatic Neuroblastoma RAS viral oncogene homolog (NRAS) mutation-positive melanoma as confirmed by central assessment.
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Binimetinib (MEK162) Participants received oral binimetinib 45 milligram (mg) (3\*15 mg tablets) twice daily, until disease progression (PD), unacceptable toxicity, death, physician decision, study termination or discontinuation due to any other reason (e.g., withdrawal of consent, lost to follow-up, start of a new anti-cancer therapy). Maximum duration of binimetinib treatment exposure in the study was 215.4 weeks and participants were followed up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment. Participants who discontinued study treatment due to start of a new anti-cancer therapy, were followed up at every 9 weeks until documented progression per Blinded Independent Review Committee (BIRC), withdrawal of consent, lost to follow-up, study closure or death whichever occurred first. | 269 |
| Dacarbazine Participants received intravenous (IV) dacarbazine 1000 mg per square meter (mg/m\^2) once every 3 weeks until PD, unacceptable toxicity, death, physician decision, study termination or discontinuation due to any other reason (e.g., withdrawal of consent, lost to follow-up, start of a new anti-cancer therapy). Maximum duration of dacarbazine treatment exposure in the study was 119.9 weeks and participants were followed up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment. Participants who discontinued study treatment due to start of a new anti-cancer therapy, were followed up at every 9 weeks until documented progression per BIRC, withdrawal of consent, lost to follow-up, study closure or death whichever occurred first. | 133 |
| Total | 402 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 | FG001 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Follow up Phase | Adverse Event | 17 | 1 |
| Follow up Phase | Death | 21 | 4 |
| Follow up Phase | Lost to Follow-up | 1 | 0 |
| Follow up Phase | New therapy for study indication | 12 | 3 |
| Follow up Phase | Physician Decision | 10 | 3 |
| Follow up Phase | Progressive disease | 127 | 62 |
| Follow up Phase | Subject/guardian decision | 9 | 2 |
| Treatment Phase | Adverse Event | 66 | 8 |
| Treatment Phase | Death | 10 | 1 |
| Treatment Phase | Other | 0 | 1 |
| Treatment Phase | Participant/Guardian decision | 26 | 14 |
| Treatment Phase | Physician Decision | 24 | 13 |
| Treatment Phase | Progressive Disease | 142 | 76 |
| Treatment Phase | Protocol Violation | 1 | 1 |
| Treatment Phase | Randomized but not Treated | 0 | 19 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Binimetinib (MEK162) | Dacarbazine | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 63.6 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.28 | 60.6 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.35 | 62.6 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.71 |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 103 Participants | 48 Participants | 151 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 166 Participants | 85 Participants | 251 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | — / — | — / — |
| other Total, other adverse events | 266 / 269 | 100 / 114 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 95 / 269 | 26 / 114 |
Outcome results
Progression-Free Survival (PFS) by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) v1.1
PFS: time from randomization to first documented PD or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. RECIST 1.1, PD: \>=20% increase in sum of diameter of target lesions (TLs) taking as reference the smallest sum on study (including baseline sum), sum must also be an absolute increase of \>=5 mm; unequivocal progression of existing non-TLs; appearance of \>=1 lesion. Complete response (CR): disappearance of all lesions; any pathological lymph nodes (TLs) or non-pathological (non-TLs) must have reduction in short axis to \<10 mm; normalization of tumor marker level for non-TLs. Partial response (PR): \>=30% decrease in sum of diameter of all TLs, referring baseline sum of diameters. Stable disease (SD): neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor increase in lesions qualified for PD referring smallest sum diameter. With no event at time of analysis cut-off or at start of any new anti-neoplastic therapy, PFS censored at date of last adequate tumor assessment of CR, PR or SD.
Time frame: From the date of randomization to the date of the first documented PD or death, whichever occurred first (maximum up to 77 weeks for binimetinib arm; maximum up to 61 weeks for dacarbazine arm)
Population: FAS consisted of all randomized participants.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Binimetinib (MEK162) | Progression-Free Survival (PFS) by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) v1.1 | 2.83 Months |
| Dacarbazine | Progression-Free Survival (PFS) by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) v1.1 | 1.51 Months |
Change From Baseline in EuroQoL-5 Dimensions- 5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L) Index Score at Weeks 4, 7, 13, 19, 25, 34, 43, 52, 61, 70, End of Treatment, Safety Follow-up Visit, Post-treatment Follow-up Visit 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6
EQ-5D-5L, is a standardized measure of health utility that provides a single index value for one's health status. EQ-5D-5L contained 1 item for each of 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 5 levels: 1= no problems, 2= slight problems, 3= moderate problems, 4= severe problems, and 5= extreme problems. Index score: participant responses to the 5 dimensions reflected a specific health state that corresponded to a population preference weight for that state on a continuous scale of 0 (death) to 1 (perfect health). Higher index scores = better health state. Post-treatment tumor assessments follow up visits occurred at every 9 weeks if participants started new anticancer therapy.
Time frame: Both arms: Baseline, Day 1 Treatment Week (TW) 4,7,13,19,25,34,43,52; Post-treatment follow-up Visit (FUV) 1 to 6; Binimetinib: Day 1 TW61,70; End of treatment (EOT= TW73); Safety FUV=30 days post TW73; Dacarbazine: EOT=TW 57;Safety FUV=30 days post TW57
Population: FAS consisted of all randomized participants. Here, Number analyzed signifies number of participants evaluable at specified time points.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Binimetinib (MEK162) | Change From Baseline in EuroQoL-5 Dimensions- 5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L) Index Score at Weeks 4, 7, 13, 19, 25, 34, 43, 52, 61, 70, End of Treatment, Safety Follow-up Visit, Post-treatment Follow-up Visit 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 | Baseline | 0.7780 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.22464 |
| Binimetinib (MEK162) | Change From Baseline in EuroQoL-5 Dimensions- 5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L) Index Score at Weeks 4, 7, 13, 19, 25, 34, 43, 52, 61, 70, End of Treatment, Safety Follow-up Visit, Post-treatment Follow-up Visit 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 | Week 43 Day 1 | -0.0170 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.22978 |
| Binimetinib (MEK162) | Change From Baseline in EuroQoL-5 Dimensions- 5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L) Index Score at Weeks 4, 7, 13, 19, 25, 34, 43, 52, 61, 70, End of Treatment, Safety Follow-up Visit, Post-treatment Follow-up Visit 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 | Week 52 Day 1 | -0.0389 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.24609 |
| Binimetinib (MEK162) | Change From Baseline in EuroQoL-5 Dimensions- 5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L) Index Score at Weeks 4, 7, 13, 19, 25, 34, 43, 52, 61, 70, End of Treatment, Safety Follow-up Visit, Post-treatment Follow-up Visit 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 | Week 61 Day 1 | 0.0690 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.2108 |
| Binimetinib (MEK162) | Change From Baseline in EuroQoL-5 Dimensions- 5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L) Index Score at Weeks 4, 7, 13, 19, 25, 34, 43, 52, 61, 70, End of Treatment, Safety Follow-up Visit, Post-treatment Follow-up Visit 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 | Week 70 Day 1 | 0.0120 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.14001 |
| Binimetinib (MEK162) | Change From Baseline in EuroQoL-5 Dimensions- 5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L) Index Score at Weeks 4, 7, 13, 19, 25, 34, 43, 52, 61, 70, End of Treatment, Safety Follow-up Visit, Post-treatment Follow-up Visit 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 | End of Treatment | -0.0978 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.23931 |
| Binimetinib (MEK162) | Change From Baseline in EuroQoL-5 Dimensions- 5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L) Index Score at Weeks 4, 7, 13, 19, 25, 34, 43, 52, 61, 70, End of Treatment, Safety Follow-up Visit, Post-treatment Follow-up Visit 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 | 30-day safety follow-up | -0.1165 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.2441 |
| Binimetinib (MEK162) | Change From Baseline in EuroQoL-5 Dimensions- 5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L) Index Score at Weeks 4, 7, 13, 19, 25, 34, 43, 52, 61, 70, End of Treatment, Safety Follow-up Visit, Post-treatment Follow-up Visit 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 | Post treatment follow-up 1 | -0.0820 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.11993 |
| Binimetinib (MEK162) | Change From Baseline in EuroQoL-5 Dimensions- 5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L) Index Score at Weeks 4, 7, 13, 19, 25, 34, 43, 52, 61, 70, End of Treatment, Safety Follow-up Visit, Post-treatment Follow-up Visit 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 | Post treatment follow-up 2 | -0.2480 Units on a scale | — |
| Binimetinib (MEK162) | Change From Baseline in EuroQoL-5 Dimensions- 5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L) Index Score at Weeks 4, 7, 13, 19, 25, 34, 43, 52, 61, 70, End of Treatment, Safety Follow-up Visit, Post-treatment Follow-up Visit 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 | Post treatment follow-up 3 | -0.1210 Units on a scale | — |
| Binimetinib (MEK162) | Change From Baseline in EuroQoL-5 Dimensions- 5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L) Index Score at Weeks 4, 7, 13, 19, 25, 34, 43, 52, 61, 70, End of Treatment, Safety Follow-up Visit, Post-treatment Follow-up Visit 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 | Post treatment follow-up 4 | 0.1115 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.15768 |
| Binimetinib (MEK162) | Change From Baseline in EuroQoL-5 Dimensions- 5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L) Index Score at Weeks 4, 7, 13, 19, 25, 34, 43, 52, 61, 70, End of Treatment, Safety Follow-up Visit, Post-treatment Follow-up Visit 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 | Post treatment follow-up 5 | 0.1730 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.24466 |
| Binimetinib (MEK162) | Change From Baseline in EuroQoL-5 Dimensions- 5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L) Index Score at Weeks 4, 7, 13, 19, 25, 34, 43, 52, 61, 70, End of Treatment, Safety Follow-up Visit, Post-treatment Follow-up Visit 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 | Post treatment follow-up 6 | 0.2230 Units on a scale | — |
| Binimetinib (MEK162) | Change From Baseline in EuroQoL-5 Dimensions- 5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L) Index Score at Weeks 4, 7, 13, 19, 25, 34, 43, 52, 61, 70, End of Treatment, Safety Follow-up Visit, Post-treatment Follow-up Visit 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 | Week 4 Day 1 | -0.0422 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.18291 |
| Binimetinib (MEK162) | Change From Baseline in EuroQoL-5 Dimensions- 5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L) Index Score at Weeks 4, 7, 13, 19, 25, 34, 43, 52, 61, 70, End of Treatment, Safety Follow-up Visit, Post-treatment Follow-up Visit 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 | Week 7 Day 1 | -0.0397 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.19154 |
| Binimetinib (MEK162) | Change From Baseline in EuroQoL-5 Dimensions- 5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L) Index Score at Weeks 4, 7, 13, 19, 25, 34, 43, 52, 61, 70, End of Treatment, Safety Follow-up Visit, Post-treatment Follow-up Visit 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 | Week 13 Day 1 | -0.0773 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.17543 |
| Binimetinib (MEK162) | Change From Baseline in EuroQoL-5 Dimensions- 5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L) Index Score at Weeks 4, 7, 13, 19, 25, 34, 43, 52, 61, 70, End of Treatment, Safety Follow-up Visit, Post-treatment Follow-up Visit 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 | Week 19 Day 1 | -0.0576 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.22503 |
| Binimetinib (MEK162) | Change From Baseline in EuroQoL-5 Dimensions- 5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L) Index Score at Weeks 4, 7, 13, 19, 25, 34, 43, 52, 61, 70, End of Treatment, Safety Follow-up Visit, Post-treatment Follow-up Visit 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 | Week 25 Day 1 | -0.1563 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.32142 |
| Binimetinib (MEK162) | Change From Baseline in EuroQoL-5 Dimensions- 5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L) Index Score at Weeks 4, 7, 13, 19, 25, 34, 43, 52, 61, 70, End of Treatment, Safety Follow-up Visit, Post-treatment Follow-up Visit 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 | Week 34 Day 1 | -0.0801 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.11141 |
| Dacarbazine | Change From Baseline in EuroQoL-5 Dimensions- 5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L) Index Score at Weeks 4, 7, 13, 19, 25, 34, 43, 52, 61, 70, End of Treatment, Safety Follow-up Visit, Post-treatment Follow-up Visit 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 | Baseline | 0.7657 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.23003 |
| Dacarbazine | Change From Baseline in EuroQoL-5 Dimensions- 5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L) Index Score at Weeks 4, 7, 13, 19, 25, 34, 43, 52, 61, 70, End of Treatment, Safety Follow-up Visit, Post-treatment Follow-up Visit 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 | Week 34 Day 1 | 0.0617 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.15254 |
| Dacarbazine | Change From Baseline in EuroQoL-5 Dimensions- 5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L) Index Score at Weeks 4, 7, 13, 19, 25, 34, 43, 52, 61, 70, End of Treatment, Safety Follow-up Visit, Post-treatment Follow-up Visit 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 | Week 4 Day 1 | 0.0110 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.12135 |
| Dacarbazine | Change From Baseline in EuroQoL-5 Dimensions- 5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L) Index Score at Weeks 4, 7, 13, 19, 25, 34, 43, 52, 61, 70, End of Treatment, Safety Follow-up Visit, Post-treatment Follow-up Visit 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 | Post treatment follow-up 1 | -0.0438 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.25374 |
| Dacarbazine | Change From Baseline in EuroQoL-5 Dimensions- 5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L) Index Score at Weeks 4, 7, 13, 19, 25, 34, 43, 52, 61, 70, End of Treatment, Safety Follow-up Visit, Post-treatment Follow-up Visit 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 | Week 7 Day 1 | 0.0132 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.14084 |
| Dacarbazine | Change From Baseline in EuroQoL-5 Dimensions- 5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L) Index Score at Weeks 4, 7, 13, 19, 25, 34, 43, 52, 61, 70, End of Treatment, Safety Follow-up Visit, Post-treatment Follow-up Visit 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 | Week 43 Day 1 | 0.1060 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.15033 |
| Dacarbazine | Change From Baseline in EuroQoL-5 Dimensions- 5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L) Index Score at Weeks 4, 7, 13, 19, 25, 34, 43, 52, 61, 70, End of Treatment, Safety Follow-up Visit, Post-treatment Follow-up Visit 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 | Week 13 Day 1 | 0.0198 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.15236 |
| Dacarbazine | Change From Baseline in EuroQoL-5 Dimensions- 5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L) Index Score at Weeks 4, 7, 13, 19, 25, 34, 43, 52, 61, 70, End of Treatment, Safety Follow-up Visit, Post-treatment Follow-up Visit 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 | 30-day safety follow-up | -0.0740 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.17682 |
| Dacarbazine | Change From Baseline in EuroQoL-5 Dimensions- 5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L) Index Score at Weeks 4, 7, 13, 19, 25, 34, 43, 52, 61, 70, End of Treatment, Safety Follow-up Visit, Post-treatment Follow-up Visit 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 | Week 19 Day 1 | 0.0257 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.18052 |
| Dacarbazine | Change From Baseline in EuroQoL-5 Dimensions- 5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L) Index Score at Weeks 4, 7, 13, 19, 25, 34, 43, 52, 61, 70, End of Treatment, Safety Follow-up Visit, Post-treatment Follow-up Visit 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 | Week 52 Day 1 | 0.0000 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0 |
| Dacarbazine | Change From Baseline in EuroQoL-5 Dimensions- 5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L) Index Score at Weeks 4, 7, 13, 19, 25, 34, 43, 52, 61, 70, End of Treatment, Safety Follow-up Visit, Post-treatment Follow-up Visit 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 | Week 25 Day 1 | 0.0657 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.16052 |
| Dacarbazine | Change From Baseline in EuroQoL-5 Dimensions- 5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L) Index Score at Weeks 4, 7, 13, 19, 25, 34, 43, 52, 61, 70, End of Treatment, Safety Follow-up Visit, Post-treatment Follow-up Visit 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 | End of Treatment | -0.0540 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.19164 |
Change From Baseline in Global Health Status Score of EORTC QLQ-C30 at Weeks 4, 7, 13, 19, 25, 34, 43, 52, 61, 70, End of Treatment, Safety Follow-up Visit, Post-Treatment Follow-up Visit 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6
EORTC QLQ-C30: 5 functional scales (physical, role, cognitive, emotional, and social), a h global health status scale, 3 symptom scales (nausea/vomiting, pain, fatigue) and 6 single items (dyspnea, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea and financial difficulties). All scales and single-item measures range =0 to 100. High score for global health status = high quality of life. Post-treatment tumor assessments follow up visits occurred at every 9 weeks if participants started new anticancer therapy.
Time frame: Both arms: Baseline, Day 1 Treatment Week (TW) 4,7,13,19,25,34,43,52; Post-treatment follow-up Visit (FUV) 1 to 6; Binimetinib: Day 1 TW61,70; End of treatment (EOT= TW73); Safety FUV=30 days post TW73; Dacarbazine: EOT=TW 57;Safety FUV=30 days post TW57
Population: FAS consisted of all randomized participants. Here, Number analyzed signifies number of participants evaluable at specified time points.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Binimetinib (MEK162) | Change From Baseline in Global Health Status Score of EORTC QLQ-C30 at Weeks 4, 7, 13, 19, 25, 34, 43, 52, 61, 70, End of Treatment, Safety Follow-up Visit, Post-Treatment Follow-up Visit 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 | Post treatment follow-up 6 | 33.33 Units on a scale | — |
| Binimetinib (MEK162) | Change From Baseline in Global Health Status Score of EORTC QLQ-C30 at Weeks 4, 7, 13, 19, 25, 34, 43, 52, 61, 70, End of Treatment, Safety Follow-up Visit, Post-Treatment Follow-up Visit 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 | Baseline | 68.35 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 23.463 |
| Binimetinib (MEK162) | Change From Baseline in Global Health Status Score of EORTC QLQ-C30 at Weeks 4, 7, 13, 19, 25, 34, 43, 52, 61, 70, End of Treatment, Safety Follow-up Visit, Post-Treatment Follow-up Visit 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 | Week 34 Day 1 | -6.25 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 18.755 |
| Binimetinib (MEK162) | Change From Baseline in Global Health Status Score of EORTC QLQ-C30 at Weeks 4, 7, 13, 19, 25, 34, 43, 52, 61, 70, End of Treatment, Safety Follow-up Visit, Post-Treatment Follow-up Visit 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 | Week 43 Day 1 | -11.36 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 20.841 |
| Binimetinib (MEK162) | Change From Baseline in Global Health Status Score of EORTC QLQ-C30 at Weeks 4, 7, 13, 19, 25, 34, 43, 52, 61, 70, End of Treatment, Safety Follow-up Visit, Post-Treatment Follow-up Visit 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 | Week 52 Day 1 | -1.52 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 20.006 |
| Binimetinib (MEK162) | Change From Baseline in Global Health Status Score of EORTC QLQ-C30 at Weeks 4, 7, 13, 19, 25, 34, 43, 52, 61, 70, End of Treatment, Safety Follow-up Visit, Post-Treatment Follow-up Visit 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 | Week 61 Day 1 | -10.00 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 18.066 |
| Binimetinib (MEK162) | Change From Baseline in Global Health Status Score of EORTC QLQ-C30 at Weeks 4, 7, 13, 19, 25, 34, 43, 52, 61, 70, End of Treatment, Safety Follow-up Visit, Post-Treatment Follow-up Visit 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 | Week 70 Day 1 | -20.83 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 5.893 |
| Binimetinib (MEK162) | Change From Baseline in Global Health Status Score of EORTC QLQ-C30 at Weeks 4, 7, 13, 19, 25, 34, 43, 52, 61, 70, End of Treatment, Safety Follow-up Visit, Post-Treatment Follow-up Visit 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 | End of Treatment | -12.20 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 22.512 |
| Binimetinib (MEK162) | Change From Baseline in Global Health Status Score of EORTC QLQ-C30 at Weeks 4, 7, 13, 19, 25, 34, 43, 52, 61, 70, End of Treatment, Safety Follow-up Visit, Post-Treatment Follow-up Visit 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 | 30-day safety follow-up | -8.10 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 21.361 |
| Binimetinib (MEK162) | Change From Baseline in Global Health Status Score of EORTC QLQ-C30 at Weeks 4, 7, 13, 19, 25, 34, 43, 52, 61, 70, End of Treatment, Safety Follow-up Visit, Post-Treatment Follow-up Visit 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 | Post treatment follow-up 1 | -5.95 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 19.211 |
| Binimetinib (MEK162) | Change From Baseline in Global Health Status Score of EORTC QLQ-C30 at Weeks 4, 7, 13, 19, 25, 34, 43, 52, 61, 70, End of Treatment, Safety Follow-up Visit, Post-Treatment Follow-up Visit 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 | Post treatment follow-up 2 | 0.00 Units on a scale | — |
| Binimetinib (MEK162) | Change From Baseline in Global Health Status Score of EORTC QLQ-C30 at Weeks 4, 7, 13, 19, 25, 34, 43, 52, 61, 70, End of Treatment, Safety Follow-up Visit, Post-Treatment Follow-up Visit 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 | Post treatment follow-up 3 | 16.67 Units on a scale | — |
| Binimetinib (MEK162) | Change From Baseline in Global Health Status Score of EORTC QLQ-C30 at Weeks 4, 7, 13, 19, 25, 34, 43, 52, 61, 70, End of Treatment, Safety Follow-up Visit, Post-Treatment Follow-up Visit 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 | Post treatment follow-up 4 | 25.00 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 11.785 |
| Binimetinib (MEK162) | Change From Baseline in Global Health Status Score of EORTC QLQ-C30 at Weeks 4, 7, 13, 19, 25, 34, 43, 52, 61, 70, End of Treatment, Safety Follow-up Visit, Post-Treatment Follow-up Visit 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 | Post treatment follow-up 5 | 25.00 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 11.785 |
| Binimetinib (MEK162) | Change From Baseline in Global Health Status Score of EORTC QLQ-C30 at Weeks 4, 7, 13, 19, 25, 34, 43, 52, 61, 70, End of Treatment, Safety Follow-up Visit, Post-Treatment Follow-up Visit 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 | Week 4 Day 1 | -5.75 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 22.285 |
| Binimetinib (MEK162) | Change From Baseline in Global Health Status Score of EORTC QLQ-C30 at Weeks 4, 7, 13, 19, 25, 34, 43, 52, 61, 70, End of Treatment, Safety Follow-up Visit, Post-Treatment Follow-up Visit 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 | Week 7 Day 1 | -8.63 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 22.562 |
| Binimetinib (MEK162) | Change From Baseline in Global Health Status Score of EORTC QLQ-C30 at Weeks 4, 7, 13, 19, 25, 34, 43, 52, 61, 70, End of Treatment, Safety Follow-up Visit, Post-Treatment Follow-up Visit 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 | Week 13 Day 1 | -8.28 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 19.659 |
| Binimetinib (MEK162) | Change From Baseline in Global Health Status Score of EORTC QLQ-C30 at Weeks 4, 7, 13, 19, 25, 34, 43, 52, 61, 70, End of Treatment, Safety Follow-up Visit, Post-Treatment Follow-up Visit 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 | Week 19 Day 1 | -8.05 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 21.053 |
| Binimetinib (MEK162) | Change From Baseline in Global Health Status Score of EORTC QLQ-C30 at Weeks 4, 7, 13, 19, 25, 34, 43, 52, 61, 70, End of Treatment, Safety Follow-up Visit, Post-Treatment Follow-up Visit 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 | Week 25 Day 1 | -10.58 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 21.775 |
| Dacarbazine | Change From Baseline in Global Health Status Score of EORTC QLQ-C30 at Weeks 4, 7, 13, 19, 25, 34, 43, 52, 61, 70, End of Treatment, Safety Follow-up Visit, Post-Treatment Follow-up Visit 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 | Baseline | 70.50 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 21.823 |
| Dacarbazine | Change From Baseline in Global Health Status Score of EORTC QLQ-C30 at Weeks 4, 7, 13, 19, 25, 34, 43, 52, 61, 70, End of Treatment, Safety Follow-up Visit, Post-Treatment Follow-up Visit 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 | Week 34 Day 1 | 3.57 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 20.893 |
| Dacarbazine | Change From Baseline in Global Health Status Score of EORTC QLQ-C30 at Weeks 4, 7, 13, 19, 25, 34, 43, 52, 61, 70, End of Treatment, Safety Follow-up Visit, Post-Treatment Follow-up Visit 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 | Week 4 Day 1 | -1.81 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 17.512 |
| Dacarbazine | Change From Baseline in Global Health Status Score of EORTC QLQ-C30 at Weeks 4, 7, 13, 19, 25, 34, 43, 52, 61, 70, End of Treatment, Safety Follow-up Visit, Post-Treatment Follow-up Visit 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 | Post treatment follow-up 1 | -8.59 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 21.218 |
| Dacarbazine | Change From Baseline in Global Health Status Score of EORTC QLQ-C30 at Weeks 4, 7, 13, 19, 25, 34, 43, 52, 61, 70, End of Treatment, Safety Follow-up Visit, Post-Treatment Follow-up Visit 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 | Week 7 Day 1 | 0.00 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 15.691 |
| Dacarbazine | Change From Baseline in Global Health Status Score of EORTC QLQ-C30 at Weeks 4, 7, 13, 19, 25, 34, 43, 52, 61, 70, End of Treatment, Safety Follow-up Visit, Post-Treatment Follow-up Visit 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 | Week 43 Day 1 | -6.94 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 23.224 |
| Dacarbazine | Change From Baseline in Global Health Status Score of EORTC QLQ-C30 at Weeks 4, 7, 13, 19, 25, 34, 43, 52, 61, 70, End of Treatment, Safety Follow-up Visit, Post-Treatment Follow-up Visit 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 | Week 13 Day 1 | -1.34 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 16.955 |
| Dacarbazine | Change From Baseline in Global Health Status Score of EORTC QLQ-C30 at Weeks 4, 7, 13, 19, 25, 34, 43, 52, 61, 70, End of Treatment, Safety Follow-up Visit, Post-Treatment Follow-up Visit 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 | 30-day safety follow-up | -9.62 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 14.372 |
| Dacarbazine | Change From Baseline in Global Health Status Score of EORTC QLQ-C30 at Weeks 4, 7, 13, 19, 25, 34, 43, 52, 61, 70, End of Treatment, Safety Follow-up Visit, Post-Treatment Follow-up Visit 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 | Week 19 Day 1 | -3.26 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 22.296 |
| Dacarbazine | Change From Baseline in Global Health Status Score of EORTC QLQ-C30 at Weeks 4, 7, 13, 19, 25, 34, 43, 52, 61, 70, End of Treatment, Safety Follow-up Visit, Post-Treatment Follow-up Visit 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 | Week 52 Day 1 | -8.33 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 11.785 |
| Dacarbazine | Change From Baseline in Global Health Status Score of EORTC QLQ-C30 at Weeks 4, 7, 13, 19, 25, 34, 43, 52, 61, 70, End of Treatment, Safety Follow-up Visit, Post-Treatment Follow-up Visit 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 | Week 25 Day 1 | -3.47 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 13.036 |
| Dacarbazine | Change From Baseline in Global Health Status Score of EORTC QLQ-C30 at Weeks 4, 7, 13, 19, 25, 34, 43, 52, 61, 70, End of Treatment, Safety Follow-up Visit, Post-Treatment Follow-up Visit 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 | End of Treatment | -6.74 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 21.536 |
Disease Control Rate (DCR)
DCR was calculated as the percentage of participants with a BOR of CR, PR, SD RECIST V1.1, a) CR: disappearance of all lesions; any pathological lymph nodes (TLs) or non-pathological (non-TLs) must have reduction in short axis to \<10 mm; normalization of tumor marker level for non-TLs; b) PR: \>=30% decrease in sum of diameter of all target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters; c) SD: neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR or CR nor an increase in lesions which would qualify for PD taking as reference the smallest sum diameters; d) PD: \>=20% increase in sum of diameter of all measured target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum of diameter of all target lesions recorded at or after baseline, sum must also be absolute increase of \>=5 mm. Unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. Appearance of at least 1 new lesion.
Time frame: From date of randomization until first documented response of CR, PR, SD or non-CR/non-PD (maximum up to 77 weeks for binimetinib arm; maximum up to 61 weeks for dacarbazine arm)
Population: FAS consisted of all randomized participants.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Binimetinib (MEK162) | Disease Control Rate (DCR) | 58.4 Percentage of participants |
| Dacarbazine | Disease Control Rate (DCR) | 24.8 Percentage of participants |
Duration of Objective Response (DOR)
DOR: time from date of first documented response (CR or PR) to first documented progression or death due to underlying cancer. RECIST V1.1, a) CR: disappearance of all lesions; any pathological lymph nodes (TLs) or non-pathological (non-TLs) must have reduction in short axis to \<10 mm; normalization of tumor marker level for non-TLs; b) PR: \>=30% decrease in sum of diameter (dia) of all TLs, referring baseline sum of dia; c) PD: \>=20% increase in sum of diameter of all measured target lesions taking as reference smallest sum of diameter of all target lesions recorded at or after baseline, sum must also be absolute increase of \>=5 mm. Unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. Appearance of at least 1 new lesion. If a participant with a CR or PR had no PD or death due to underlying cancer, participants was censored at date of last adequate tumor assessment.
Time frame: From the date of first documented response (CR or PR) to the first documented progression or death (maximum up to 77 weeks for binimetinib arm; maximum up to 61 weeks for dacarbazine arm)
Population: Analysis population consisted of all randomized participants and who had confirmed responses (CR or PR).
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Binimetinib (MEK162) | Duration of Objective Response (DOR) | 6.87 Months |
| Dacarbazine | Duration of Objective Response (DOR) | NA Months |
Number of Participants With Adverse Events of Special Interest: Cardiac Events
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship with the study treatment. Grade 1: asymptomatic or mild symptoms, clinical or diagnostic observations only, intervention not indicated; Grade 2: moderate, minimal, local or noninvasive intervention indicated, limiting age-appropriate instrumental activities of daily life (ADL); Grade 3: severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening, hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization indicated, disabling, limiting self-care ADL; Grade 4: life-threatening consequence, urgent intervention indicated; Grade 5: death related to AE. Here, in this outcome measure data is reported for events falling in any of the grades.
Time frame: From baseline up to 77 weeks in binimetinib arm; From baseline up to 61 weeks for dacarbazine arm
Population: The safety set consisted all participants who received at least one dose of the study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline safety evaluation.
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| Binimetinib (MEK162) | Number of Participants With Adverse Events of Special Interest: Cardiac Events | 35 Participants |
| Dacarbazine | Number of Participants With Adverse Events of Special Interest: Cardiac Events | 2 Participants |
Number of Participants With Adverse Events of Special Interest: Ocular Events
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship with the study treatment. Grade 1: Asymptomatic or mild symptoms; clinical or diagnostic observations only; intervention not indicated; Grade 2: Moderate; minimal, local or noninvasive intervention indicated; limiting age appropriate instrumental ADL; Grade 3: Severe or medically significant but not immediately sight threatening; Hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization indicated; disabling; limiting self-care ADL; Grade 4: Sight-threatening consequences; urgent intervention indicated; blindness (20/200 or worse) in the affected eye. Here, in this outcome measure data is reported for events falling in any of the grades.
Time frame: From baseline up to 77 weeks in binimetinib arm; From baseline up to 61 weeks for dacarbazine arm
Population: The safety set consisted all participants who received at least one dose of the study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline safety evaluation.
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| Binimetinib (MEK162) | Number of Participants With Adverse Events of Special Interest: Ocular Events | 6 Participants |
| Dacarbazine | Number of Participants With Adverse Events of Special Interest: Ocular Events | 0 Participants |
Number of Participants With Clinically Notable Clinical Chemistry/Biochemistry Shifts Based on NCI-CTCAE Grade, Version 4.03
Clinically notable shifts are defined as worsening by at least 2 grades or to \>= grade 3. Severity was graded as Grade 1: asymptomatic or mild symptoms, clinical or diagnostic observations only, intervention not indicated; Grade 2: moderate, minimal, local or noninvasive intervention indicated, limiting age-appropriate instrumental ADL; Grade 3: severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening, hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization indicated, disabling, limiting self-care ADL; Grade 4: life-threatening consequence, urgent intervention indicated; Grade 5: death related to AE.
Time frame: From baseline up to 77 weeks in binimetinib arm; From baseline up to 61 weeks for dacarbazine arm
Population: The safety set consisted all participants who received at least one dose of the study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline safety evaluation.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Binimetinib (MEK162) | Number of Participants With Clinically Notable Clinical Chemistry/Biochemistry Shifts Based on NCI-CTCAE Grade, Version 4.03 | Albumin decreased | 27 Participants |
| Binimetinib (MEK162) | Number of Participants With Clinically Notable Clinical Chemistry/Biochemistry Shifts Based on NCI-CTCAE Grade, Version 4.03 | Alkaline phosphatase | 8 Participants |
| Binimetinib (MEK162) | Number of Participants With Clinically Notable Clinical Chemistry/Biochemistry Shifts Based on NCI-CTCAE Grade, Version 4.03 | Alanine aminotransferase | 14 Participants |
| Binimetinib (MEK162) | Number of Participants With Clinically Notable Clinical Chemistry/Biochemistry Shifts Based on NCI-CTCAE Grade, Version 4.03 | Aspartate aminotransferase | 20 Participants |
| Binimetinib (MEK162) | Number of Participants With Clinically Notable Clinical Chemistry/Biochemistry Shifts Based on NCI-CTCAE Grade, Version 4.03 | Bilirubin | 1 Participants |
| Binimetinib (MEK162) | Number of Participants With Clinically Notable Clinical Chemistry/Biochemistry Shifts Based on NCI-CTCAE Grade, Version 4.03 | Corrected Calcium increased | 2 Participants |
| Binimetinib (MEK162) | Number of Participants With Clinically Notable Clinical Chemistry/Biochemistry Shifts Based on NCI-CTCAE Grade, Version 4.03 | Corrected Calcium decreased | 2 Participants |
| Binimetinib (MEK162) | Number of Participants With Clinically Notable Clinical Chemistry/Biochemistry Shifts Based on NCI-CTCAE Grade, Version 4.03 | Creatinine | 9 Participants |
| Binimetinib (MEK162) | Number of Participants With Clinically Notable Clinical Chemistry/Biochemistry Shifts Based on NCI-CTCAE Grade, Version 4.03 | Gamma-glutamyl transferase | 9 Participants |
| Binimetinib (MEK162) | Number of Participants With Clinically Notable Clinical Chemistry/Biochemistry Shifts Based on NCI-CTCAE Grade, Version 4.03 | Glucose serum fasting increased | 13 Participants |
| Binimetinib (MEK162) | Number of Participants With Clinically Notable Clinical Chemistry/Biochemistry Shifts Based on NCI-CTCAE Grade, Version 4.03 | Glucose serum fasting decreased | 6 Participants |
| Binimetinib (MEK162) | Number of Participants With Clinically Notable Clinical Chemistry/Biochemistry Shifts Based on NCI-CTCAE Grade, Version 4.03 | Potassium increased | 13 Participants |
| Binimetinib (MEK162) | Number of Participants With Clinically Notable Clinical Chemistry/Biochemistry Shifts Based on NCI-CTCAE Grade, Version 4.03 | Potassium decreased | 14 Participants |
| Binimetinib (MEK162) | Number of Participants With Clinically Notable Clinical Chemistry/Biochemistry Shifts Based on NCI-CTCAE Grade, Version 4.03 | Magnesium increased | 1 Participants |
| Binimetinib (MEK162) | Number of Participants With Clinically Notable Clinical Chemistry/Biochemistry Shifts Based on NCI-CTCAE Grade, Version 4.03 | Magnesium decreased | 1 Participants |
| Binimetinib (MEK162) | Number of Participants With Clinically Notable Clinical Chemistry/Biochemistry Shifts Based on NCI-CTCAE Grade, Version 4.03 | Phosphate decreased | 17 Participants |
| Binimetinib (MEK162) | Number of Participants With Clinically Notable Clinical Chemistry/Biochemistry Shifts Based on NCI-CTCAE Grade, Version 4.03 | Sodium increased | 23 Participants |
| Binimetinib (MEK162) | Number of Participants With Clinically Notable Clinical Chemistry/Biochemistry Shifts Based on NCI-CTCAE Grade, Version 4.03 | Sodium decreased | 4 Participants |
| Dacarbazine | Number of Participants With Clinically Notable Clinical Chemistry/Biochemistry Shifts Based on NCI-CTCAE Grade, Version 4.03 | Magnesium increased | 0 Participants |
| Dacarbazine | Number of Participants With Clinically Notable Clinical Chemistry/Biochemistry Shifts Based on NCI-CTCAE Grade, Version 4.03 | Albumin decreased | 5 Participants |
| Dacarbazine | Number of Participants With Clinically Notable Clinical Chemistry/Biochemistry Shifts Based on NCI-CTCAE Grade, Version 4.03 | Glucose serum fasting increased | 5 Participants |
| Dacarbazine | Number of Participants With Clinically Notable Clinical Chemistry/Biochemistry Shifts Based on NCI-CTCAE Grade, Version 4.03 | Alkaline phosphatase | 2 Participants |
| Dacarbazine | Number of Participants With Clinically Notable Clinical Chemistry/Biochemistry Shifts Based on NCI-CTCAE Grade, Version 4.03 | Sodium decreased | 0 Participants |
| Dacarbazine | Number of Participants With Clinically Notable Clinical Chemistry/Biochemistry Shifts Based on NCI-CTCAE Grade, Version 4.03 | Alanine aminotransferase | 4 Participants |
| Dacarbazine | Number of Participants With Clinically Notable Clinical Chemistry/Biochemistry Shifts Based on NCI-CTCAE Grade, Version 4.03 | Glucose serum fasting decreased | 0 Participants |
| Dacarbazine | Number of Participants With Clinically Notable Clinical Chemistry/Biochemistry Shifts Based on NCI-CTCAE Grade, Version 4.03 | Aspartate aminotransferase | 1 Participants |
| Dacarbazine | Number of Participants With Clinically Notable Clinical Chemistry/Biochemistry Shifts Based on NCI-CTCAE Grade, Version 4.03 | Magnesium decreased | 0 Participants |
| Dacarbazine | Number of Participants With Clinically Notable Clinical Chemistry/Biochemistry Shifts Based on NCI-CTCAE Grade, Version 4.03 | Bilirubin | 1 Participants |
| Dacarbazine | Number of Participants With Clinically Notable Clinical Chemistry/Biochemistry Shifts Based on NCI-CTCAE Grade, Version 4.03 | Potassium increased | 3 Participants |
| Dacarbazine | Number of Participants With Clinically Notable Clinical Chemistry/Biochemistry Shifts Based on NCI-CTCAE Grade, Version 4.03 | Corrected Calcium increased | 4 Participants |
| Dacarbazine | Number of Participants With Clinically Notable Clinical Chemistry/Biochemistry Shifts Based on NCI-CTCAE Grade, Version 4.03 | Sodium increased | 4 Participants |
| Dacarbazine | Number of Participants With Clinically Notable Clinical Chemistry/Biochemistry Shifts Based on NCI-CTCAE Grade, Version 4.03 | Corrected Calcium decreased | 0 Participants |
| Dacarbazine | Number of Participants With Clinically Notable Clinical Chemistry/Biochemistry Shifts Based on NCI-CTCAE Grade, Version 4.03 | Potassium decreased | 1 Participants |
| Dacarbazine | Number of Participants With Clinically Notable Clinical Chemistry/Biochemistry Shifts Based on NCI-CTCAE Grade, Version 4.03 | Creatinine | 2 Participants |
| Dacarbazine | Number of Participants With Clinically Notable Clinical Chemistry/Biochemistry Shifts Based on NCI-CTCAE Grade, Version 4.03 | Phosphate decreased | 5 Participants |
| Dacarbazine | Number of Participants With Clinically Notable Clinical Chemistry/Biochemistry Shifts Based on NCI-CTCAE Grade, Version 4.03 | Gamma-glutamyl transferase | 7 Participants |
Number of Participants With Clinically Notable Hematology Shifts Based on National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria (NCI-CTCAE) Grade, Version 4.03
Clinically notable shifts are defined as worsening by at least 2 grades or to \>= grade 3. Severity was graded as Grade 1: asymptomatic or mild symptoms, clinical or diagnostic observations only, intervention not indicated; Grade 2: moderate, minimal, local or noninvasive intervention indicated, limiting age-appropriate instrumental activities of daily life (ADL); Grade 3: severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening, hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization indicated, disabling, limiting self-care ADL; Grade 4: life-threatening consequence, urgent intervention indicated; Grade 5: death related to AE.
Time frame: From baseline up to 77 weeks in binimetinib arm; From baseline up to 61 weeks for dacarbazine arm
Population: The safety set consisted all participants who received at least one dose of the study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline safety evaluation.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Binimetinib (MEK162) | Number of Participants With Clinically Notable Hematology Shifts Based on National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria (NCI-CTCAE) Grade, Version 4.03 | Hemoglobin decreased | 17 Participants |
| Binimetinib (MEK162) | Number of Participants With Clinically Notable Hematology Shifts Based on National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria (NCI-CTCAE) Grade, Version 4.03 | Neutrophils decreased | 8 Participants |
| Binimetinib (MEK162) | Number of Participants With Clinically Notable Hematology Shifts Based on National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria (NCI-CTCAE) Grade, Version 4.03 | Lymphocytes increased | 20 Participants |
| Binimetinib (MEK162) | Number of Participants With Clinically Notable Hematology Shifts Based on National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria (NCI-CTCAE) Grade, Version 4.03 | Platelets decreased | 3 Participants |
| Binimetinib (MEK162) | Number of Participants With Clinically Notable Hematology Shifts Based on National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria (NCI-CTCAE) Grade, Version 4.03 | Prothrombin international normalized ratio increased | 9 Participants |
| Binimetinib (MEK162) | Number of Participants With Clinically Notable Hematology Shifts Based on National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria (NCI-CTCAE) Grade, Version 4.03 | Leukocytes increased | 0 Participants |
| Binimetinib (MEK162) | Number of Participants With Clinically Notable Hematology Shifts Based on National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria (NCI-CTCAE) Grade, Version 4.03 | Lymphocytes decreased | 35 Participants |
| Binimetinib (MEK162) | Number of Participants With Clinically Notable Hematology Shifts Based on National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria (NCI-CTCAE) Grade, Version 4.03 | Leukocytes decreased | 6 Participants |
| Binimetinib (MEK162) | Number of Participants With Clinically Notable Hematology Shifts Based on National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria (NCI-CTCAE) Grade, Version 4.03 | Activated partial thromboplastin time prolonged | 7 Participants |
| Dacarbazine | Number of Participants With Clinically Notable Hematology Shifts Based on National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria (NCI-CTCAE) Grade, Version 4.03 | Leukocytes decreased | 26 Participants |
| Dacarbazine | Number of Participants With Clinically Notable Hematology Shifts Based on National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria (NCI-CTCAE) Grade, Version 4.03 | Activated partial thromboplastin time prolonged | 2 Participants |
| Dacarbazine | Number of Participants With Clinically Notable Hematology Shifts Based on National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria (NCI-CTCAE) Grade, Version 4.03 | Hemoglobin decreased | 13 Participants |
| Dacarbazine | Number of Participants With Clinically Notable Hematology Shifts Based on National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria (NCI-CTCAE) Grade, Version 4.03 | Prothrombin international normalized ratio increased | 0 Participants |
| Dacarbazine | Number of Participants With Clinically Notable Hematology Shifts Based on National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria (NCI-CTCAE) Grade, Version 4.03 | Lymphocytes increased | 0 Participants |
| Dacarbazine | Number of Participants With Clinically Notable Hematology Shifts Based on National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria (NCI-CTCAE) Grade, Version 4.03 | Lymphocytes decreased | 19 Participants |
| Dacarbazine | Number of Participants With Clinically Notable Hematology Shifts Based on National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria (NCI-CTCAE) Grade, Version 4.03 | Neutrophils decreased | 21 Participants |
| Dacarbazine | Number of Participants With Clinically Notable Hematology Shifts Based on National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria (NCI-CTCAE) Grade, Version 4.03 | Platelets decreased | 17 Participants |
| Dacarbazine | Number of Participants With Clinically Notable Hematology Shifts Based on National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria (NCI-CTCAE) Grade, Version 4.03 | Leukocytes increased | 0 Participants |
Number of Participants With Clinically Notable Vital Signs
Abnormalities criteria included: low/high pulse rate (beats per minute \[bpm\]):\<=50bpm with decrease from baseline \>=15bpm/\>=120bpm with increase from baseline \>=15bpm; Low/high systolic blood pressure (millimeters of mercury \[mmHg\]): \<=90mmHg with decrease from baseline \>=20mmHg/\>=160mmHg with increase from baseline \>=20mmHg; Low/high diastolic blood pressure \[mmHg\]: \<=50mmHg with decrease from baseline \>=15mmHg/\>=100mmHg with increase from baseline \>=15mmHg; Low/high body weight (kilogram \[kg\]): \>=20% decrease from baseline / \>=10% increase from baseline; Low/high body temperature (degree Celsius \[°C\]): \<=36°C / \>= 37.5°C
Time frame: From baseline up to 77 weeks in binimetinib arm; From baseline up to 61 weeks for dacarbazine arm
Population: The safety set consisted all participants who received at least one dose of the study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline safety evaluation. Here, number analyzed signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure for specified rows.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Binimetinib (MEK162) | Number of Participants With Clinically Notable Vital Signs | Sitting systolic blood pressure - High | 43 Participants |
| Binimetinib (MEK162) | Number of Participants With Clinically Notable Vital Signs | Sitting diastolic blood pressure - Low | 2 Participants |
| Binimetinib (MEK162) | Number of Participants With Clinically Notable Vital Signs | Sitting Pulse Rate - Low | 3 Participants |
| Binimetinib (MEK162) | Number of Participants With Clinically Notable Vital Signs | Weight - High | 16 Participants |
| Binimetinib (MEK162) | Number of Participants With Clinically Notable Vital Signs | Sitting systolic blood pressure -Low | 2 Participants |
| Binimetinib (MEK162) | Number of Participants With Clinically Notable Vital Signs | Weight - Low | 0 Participants |
| Binimetinib (MEK162) | Number of Participants With Clinically Notable Vital Signs | Body temperature - High | 15 Participants |
| Binimetinib (MEK162) | Number of Participants With Clinically Notable Vital Signs | Sitting Pulse Rate - High | 4 Participants |
| Binimetinib (MEK162) | Number of Participants With Clinically Notable Vital Signs | Body temperature - Low | 90 Participants |
| Binimetinib (MEK162) | Number of Participants With Clinically Notable Vital Signs | Sitting diastolic blood pressure - High | 28 Participants |
| Dacarbazine | Number of Participants With Clinically Notable Vital Signs | Body temperature - Low | 24 Participants |
| Dacarbazine | Number of Participants With Clinically Notable Vital Signs | Sitting Pulse Rate - High | 1 Participants |
| Dacarbazine | Number of Participants With Clinically Notable Vital Signs | Sitting Pulse Rate - Low | 1 Participants |
| Dacarbazine | Number of Participants With Clinically Notable Vital Signs | Sitting systolic blood pressure - High | 8 Participants |
| Dacarbazine | Number of Participants With Clinically Notable Vital Signs | Sitting systolic blood pressure -Low | 4 Participants |
| Dacarbazine | Number of Participants With Clinically Notable Vital Signs | Sitting diastolic blood pressure - High | 4 Participants |
| Dacarbazine | Number of Participants With Clinically Notable Vital Signs | Sitting diastolic blood pressure - Low | 1 Participants |
| Dacarbazine | Number of Participants With Clinically Notable Vital Signs | Weight - High | 1 Participants |
| Dacarbazine | Number of Participants With Clinically Notable Vital Signs | Body temperature - High | 6 Participants |
| Dacarbazine | Number of Participants With Clinically Notable Vital Signs | Weight - Low | 0 Participants |
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Findings in Physical Examination
A complete physical examination included the examination of general appearance, skin, neck (including thyroid), eyes, ears, nose, throat, lungs, heart, abdomen, back, lymph nodes, extremities, vascular and neurological systems. If indicated based on medical history and/or symptoms, rectal, external genitalia, breast, and pelvic examinations were performed. Clinical significance in physical examination was reported as adverse events.
Time frame: From baseline up to 77 weeks in binimetinib arm; From baseline up to 61 weeks for dacarbazine arm
Population: No data was collected and analyzed for this outcome measure, any clinically significant physical examination findings were counted as adverse events and reported in safety section.
Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS)
ECOG PS was used to assess the physical health of participants, and ranged from 0 (most active) to 5 (dead). ECOG PS grades: 0= fully active, able to carry on all pre-disease performance without restriction, 1= restricted in physically strenuous activity but ambulatory and able to carry out work of a light or sedentary nature, e.g., light house work, office work, 2= ambulatory and capable of all self-care but unable to carry out any work activities. Up and about more than 50% of waking hours, 3= capable of only limited self-care, 4=completely disabled. cannot carry on any selfcare. Totally confined to bed or chair confined to bed or chair more than 50% of waking hours and 5= dead. Post-treatment tumor assessments follow up visits occurred at every 9 weeks if participants started new anticancer therapy.
Time frame: For both arms: Baseline, Weeks 4, 7, 10, 13, 16, 19, 22, 25, 28, 31, 34, 37, 40, 43, 46, 49, 52, 55 and 30-day Follow-up For binimetinib only: Weeks 58, 61, 64, 67, 70, 73
Population: The safety set consisted all participants who received at least one dose of the study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline safety evaluation. Here, Number Analyzed signifies number of participants evaluable for specified rows.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Binimetinib (MEK162) | Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS) | Week 37 Day 1: Grade 0 | 16 Participants |
| Binimetinib (MEK162) | Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS) | Baseline : Grade 0 | 193 Participants |
| Binimetinib (MEK162) | Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS) | Week 4 Day 1: Grade 3 | 3 Participants |
| Binimetinib (MEK162) | Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS) | Week 7 Day 1: Grade 0 | 138 Participants |
| Binimetinib (MEK162) | Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS) | Week 7 Day 1: Grade 1 | 84 Participants |
| Binimetinib (MEK162) | Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS) | Week 7 Day 1: Grade 2 | 10 Participants |
| Binimetinib (MEK162) | Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS) | Week 7 Day 1: Grade 3 | 3 Participants |
| Binimetinib (MEK162) | Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS) | Week 7 Day 1: Grade 4 | 1 Participants |
| Binimetinib (MEK162) | Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS) | Week 10 Day 1: Grade 0 | 118 Participants |
| Binimetinib (MEK162) | Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS) | Week 10 Day 1: Grade 1 | 72 Participants |
| Binimetinib (MEK162) | Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS) | Week 10 Day 1: Grade 2 | 8 Participants |
| Binimetinib (MEK162) | Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS) | Week 10 Day 1: Grade 3 | 3 Participants |
| Binimetinib (MEK162) | Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS) | Week 13 Day 1: Grade 0 | 93 Participants |
| Binimetinib (MEK162) | Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS) | Week 13 Day 1: Grade 1 | 62 Participants |
| Binimetinib (MEK162) | Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS) | Week 13 Day 1: Grade 2 | 11 Participants |
| Binimetinib (MEK162) | Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS) | Week 13 Day 1: Grade 3 | 1 Participants |
| Binimetinib (MEK162) | Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS) | Week 16 Day 1: Grade 0 | 70 Participants |
| Binimetinib (MEK162) | Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS) | Week 16 Day 1: Grade 1 | 48 Participants |
| Binimetinib (MEK162) | Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS) | Week 16 Day 1: Grade 2 | 5 Participants |
| Binimetinib (MEK162) | Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS) | Week 16 Day 1: Grade 4 | 1 Participants |
| Binimetinib (MEK162) | Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS) | Week 19 Day 1: Grade 0 | 53 Participants |
| Binimetinib (MEK162) | Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS) | Week 19 Day 1: Grade 1 | 43 Participants |
| Binimetinib (MEK162) | Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS) | Week 19 Day 1:Grade 2 | 4 Participants |
| Binimetinib (MEK162) | Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS) | Week 22 Day 1: Grade 0 | 42 Participants |
| Binimetinib (MEK162) | Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS) | Week 22 Day 1: Grade 1 | 26 Participants |
| Binimetinib (MEK162) | Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS) | Week 22 Day 1: Grade 2 | 3 Participants |
| Binimetinib (MEK162) | Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS) | Week 22 Day 1: Grade 3 | 1 Participants |
| Binimetinib (MEK162) | Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS) | Week 25 Day 1: Grade 0 | 37 Participants |
| Binimetinib (MEK162) | Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS) | Week 25 Day 1: Grade 1 | 19 Participants |
| Binimetinib (MEK162) | Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS) | Week 25 Day 1: Grade 2 | 1 Participants |
| Binimetinib (MEK162) | Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS) | Week 25 Day 1: Grade 3 | 1 Participants |
| Binimetinib (MEK162) | Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS) | Week 28 Day 1: Grade 0 | 28 Participants |
| Binimetinib (MEK162) | Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS) | Week 28 Day 1: Grade 1 | 15 Participants |
| Binimetinib (MEK162) | Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS) | Week 28 Day 1: Grade 2 | 2 Participants |
| Binimetinib (MEK162) | Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS) | Week 28 Day 1: Grade 5 | 1 Participants |
| Binimetinib (MEK162) | Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS) | Week 31 Day 1: Grade 0 | 22 Participants |
| Binimetinib (MEK162) | Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS) | Week 31 Day 1: Grade 1 | 11 Participants |
| Binimetinib (MEK162) | Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS) | Week 31 Day 1: Grade 2 | 1 Participants |
| Binimetinib (MEK162) | Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS) | Week 34 Day 1: Grade 0 | 20 Participants |
| Binimetinib (MEK162) | Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS) | Week 34 Day 1: Grade 1 | 7 Participants |
| Binimetinib (MEK162) | Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS) | Week 34 Day 1: Grade 2 | 2 Participants |
| Binimetinib (MEK162) | Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS) | Week 49 Day 1: Grade 0 | 9 Participants |
| Binimetinib (MEK162) | Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS) | Week 49 Day 1: Grade 1 | 2 Participants |
| Binimetinib (MEK162) | Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS) | Week 52 Day 1: Grade 0 | 10 Participants |
| Binimetinib (MEK162) | Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS) | Week 52 Day 1: Grade 1 | 1 Participants |
| Binimetinib (MEK162) | Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS) | Week 55 Day 1: Grade 0 | 9 Participants |
| Binimetinib (MEK162) | Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS) | Week 55 Day 1: Grade 1 | 1 Participants |
| Binimetinib (MEK162) | Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS) | Week 58 Day 1: Grade 0 | 7 Participants |
| Binimetinib (MEK162) | Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS) | Week 58 Day 1: Grade 1 | 1 Participants |
| Binimetinib (MEK162) | Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS) | Week 61 Day 1: Grade 0 | 5 Participants |
| Binimetinib (MEK162) | Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS) | Week 64 Day 1: Grade 0 | 4 Participants |
| Binimetinib (MEK162) | Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS) | Week 67 Day 1: Grade 0 | 3 Participants |
| Binimetinib (MEK162) | Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS) | Week 70 Day 1: Grade 0 | 2 Participants |
| Binimetinib (MEK162) | Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS) | Week 73 Day 1: Grade 0 | 1 Participants |
| Binimetinib (MEK162) | Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS) | Safety Follow up Visit: Grade 0 | 42 Participants |
| Binimetinib (MEK162) | Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS) | Safety Follow up Visit: Grade 1 | 41 Participants |
| Binimetinib (MEK162) | Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS) | Safety Follow up Visit: Grade 2 | 14 Participants |
| Binimetinib (MEK162) | Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS) | Safety Follow up Visit: Grade 3 | 4 Participants |
| Binimetinib (MEK162) | Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS) | Safety Follow up Visit: Grade 4 | 4 Participants |
| Binimetinib (MEK162) | Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS) | Week 37 Day 1: Grade 1 | 4 Participants |
| Binimetinib (MEK162) | Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS) | Week 40 Day 1: Grade 0 | 15 Participants |
| Binimetinib (MEK162) | Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS) | Week 40 Day 1: Grade 1 | 0 Participants |
| Binimetinib (MEK162) | Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS) | Week 43 Day 1: Grade 0 | 12 Participants |
| Binimetinib (MEK162) | Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS) | Week 43 Day 1: Grade 1 | 1 Participants |
| Binimetinib (MEK162) | Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS) | Week 43 Day 1: Grade 2 | 1 Participants |
| Binimetinib (MEK162) | Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS) | Week 46 Day 1: Grade 0 | 11 Participants |
| Binimetinib (MEK162) | Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS) | Week 46 Day 1: Grade 1 | 2 Participants |
| Binimetinib (MEK162) | Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS) | Week 46 Day 1: Grade 2 | 1 Participants |
| Binimetinib (MEK162) | Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS) | Baseline: Grade 1 | 76 Participants |
| Binimetinib (MEK162) | Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS) | Baseline : Grade 2 | 0 Participants |
| Binimetinib (MEK162) | Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS) | Week 4 Day 1: Grade 0 | 146 Participants |
| Binimetinib (MEK162) | Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS) | Week 4 Day 1: Grade 1 | 101 Participants |
| Binimetinib (MEK162) | Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS) | Week 4 Day 1: Grade 2 | 6 Participants |
| Dacarbazine | Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS) | Baseline : Grade 0 | 82 Participants |
| Dacarbazine | Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS) | Week 25 Day 1: Grade 2 | 0 Participants |
| Dacarbazine | Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS) | Baseline: Grade 1 | 31 Participants |
| Dacarbazine | Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS) | Safety Follow up Visit: Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| Dacarbazine | Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS) | Baseline : Grade 2 | 1 Participants |
| Dacarbazine | Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS) | Week 25 Day 1: Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| Dacarbazine | Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS) | Week 4 Day 1: Grade 0 | 66 Participants |
| Dacarbazine | Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS) | Week 55 Day 1: Grade 1 | 1 Participants |
| Dacarbazine | Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS) | Week 4 Day 1: Grade 1 | 27 Participants |
| Dacarbazine | Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS) | Week 28 Day 1: Grade 0 | 9 Participants |
| Dacarbazine | Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS) | Week 4 Day 1: Grade 2 | 4 Participants |
| Dacarbazine | Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS) | Week 46 Day 1: Grade 0 | 4 Participants |
| Dacarbazine | Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS) | Week 4 Day 1: Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| Dacarbazine | Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS) | Week 28 Day 1: Grade 1 | 2 Participants |
| Dacarbazine | Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS) | Week 7 Day 1: Grade 0 | 51 Participants |
| Dacarbazine | Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS) | Safety Follow up Visit: Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Dacarbazine | Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS) | Week 7 Day 1: Grade 1 | 26 Participants |
| Dacarbazine | Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS) | Week 28 Day 1: Grade 2 | 0 Participants |
| Dacarbazine | Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS) | Week 7 Day 1: Grade 2 | 3 Participants |
| Dacarbazine | Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS) | Week 37 Day 1: Grade 0 | 7 Participants |
| Dacarbazine | Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS) | Week 7 Day 1: Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| Dacarbazine | Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS) | Week 28 Day 1: Grade 5 | 0 Participants |
| Dacarbazine | Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS) | Week 7 Day 1: Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Dacarbazine | Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS) | Week 43 Day 1: Grade 1 | 0 Participants |
| Dacarbazine | Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS) | Week 10 Day 1: Grade 0 | 34 Participants |
| Dacarbazine | Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS) | Week 31 Day 1: Grade 0 | 7 Participants |
| Dacarbazine | Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS) | Week 10 Day 1: Grade 1 | 15 Participants |
| Dacarbazine | Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS) | Week 37 Day 1: Grade 1 | 1 Participants |
| Dacarbazine | Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS) | Week 10 Day 1: Grade 2 | 2 Participants |
| Dacarbazine | Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS) | Week 31 Day 1: Grade 1 | 2 Participants |
| Dacarbazine | Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS) | Week 10 Day 1: Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| Dacarbazine | Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS) | Week 46 Day 1: Grade 2 | 0 Participants |
| Dacarbazine | Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS) | Week 13 Day 1: Grade 0 | 29 Participants |
| Dacarbazine | Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS) | Week 31 Day 1: Grade 2 | 0 Participants |
| Dacarbazine | Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS) | Week 13 Day 1: Grade 1 | 14 Participants |
| Dacarbazine | Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS) | Week 40 Day 1: Grade 0 | 6 Participants |
| Dacarbazine | Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS) | Week 13 Day 1: Grade 2 | 0 Participants |
| Dacarbazine | Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS) | Week 34 Day 1: Grade 0 | 9 Participants |
| Dacarbazine | Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS) | Week 13 Day 1: Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| Dacarbazine | Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS) | Week 43 Day 1: Grade 2 | 0 Participants |
| Dacarbazine | Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS) | Week 16 Day 1: Grade 0 | 24 Participants |
| Dacarbazine | Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS) | Week 34 Day 1: Grade 1 | 1 Participants |
| Dacarbazine | Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS) | Week 16 Day 1: Grade 1 | 5 Participants |
| Dacarbazine | Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS) | Safety Follow up Visit: Grade 0 | 24 Participants |
| Dacarbazine | Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS) | Week 16 Day 1: Grade 2 | 1 Participants |
| Dacarbazine | Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS) | Week 34 Day 1: Grade 2 | 0 Participants |
| Dacarbazine | Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS) | Week 16 Day 1: Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Dacarbazine | Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS) | Week 40 Day 1: Grade 1 | 1 Participants |
| Dacarbazine | Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS) | Week 19 Day 1: Grade 0 | 19 Participants |
| Dacarbazine | Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS) | Week 49 Day 1: Grade 0 | 1 Participants |
| Dacarbazine | Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS) | Week 19 Day 1: Grade 1 | 7 Participants |
| Dacarbazine | Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS) | Safety Follow up Visit: Grade 1 | 16 Participants |
| Dacarbazine | Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS) | Week 19 Day 1:Grade 2 | 2 Participants |
| Dacarbazine | Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS) | Week 49 Day 1: Grade 1 | 0 Participants |
| Dacarbazine | Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS) | Week 22 Day 1: Grade 0 | 17 Participants |
| Dacarbazine | Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS) | Week 46 Day 1: Grade 1 | 0 Participants |
| Dacarbazine | Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS) | Week 22 Day 1: Grade 1 | 5 Participants |
| Dacarbazine | Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS) | Week 52 Day 1: Grade 0 | 2 Participants |
| Dacarbazine | Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS) | Week 22 Day 1: Grade 2 | 0 Participants |
| Dacarbazine | Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS) | Safety Follow up Visit: Grade 2 | 4 Participants |
| Dacarbazine | Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS) | Week 22 Day 1: Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| Dacarbazine | Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS) | Week 52 Day 1: Grade 1 | 1 Participants |
| Dacarbazine | Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS) | Week 25 Day 1: Grade 0 | 13 Participants |
| Dacarbazine | Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS) | Week 43 Day 1: Grade 0 | 5 Participants |
| Dacarbazine | Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS) | Week 25 Day 1: Grade 1 | 6 Participants |
| Dacarbazine | Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS) | Week 55 Day 1: Grade 0 | 1 Participants |
Number of Participants With Neuroblastoma RAS Viral (V-ras) Oncogene Homolog (NRAS) Mutation Status at Baseline
Number of participants with NRAS mutation status at baseline were reported.
Time frame: Baseline
Population: FAS consisted of all randomized participants. Here, number analyzed signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure for specified rows.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Binimetinib (MEK162) | Number of Participants With Neuroblastoma RAS Viral (V-ras) Oncogene Homolog (NRAS) Mutation Status at Baseline | Wild Type | 0 Participants |
| Binimetinib (MEK162) | Number of Participants With Neuroblastoma RAS Viral (V-ras) Oncogene Homolog (NRAS) Mutation Status at Baseline | Mutant: Q61K | 100 Participants |
| Binimetinib (MEK162) | Number of Participants With Neuroblastoma RAS Viral (V-ras) Oncogene Homolog (NRAS) Mutation Status at Baseline | Mutant: Q61L | 32 Participants |
| Binimetinib (MEK162) | Number of Participants With Neuroblastoma RAS Viral (V-ras) Oncogene Homolog (NRAS) Mutation Status at Baseline | Mutant: Q61R | 137 Participants |
| Dacarbazine | Number of Participants With Neuroblastoma RAS Viral (V-ras) Oncogene Homolog (NRAS) Mutation Status at Baseline | Mutant: Q61R | 64 Participants |
| Dacarbazine | Number of Participants With Neuroblastoma RAS Viral (V-ras) Oncogene Homolog (NRAS) Mutation Status at Baseline | Wild Type | 1 Participants |
| Dacarbazine | Number of Participants With Neuroblastoma RAS Viral (V-ras) Oncogene Homolog (NRAS) Mutation Status at Baseline | Mutant: Q61L | 17 Participants |
| Dacarbazine | Number of Participants With Neuroblastoma RAS Viral (V-ras) Oncogene Homolog (NRAS) Mutation Status at Baseline | Mutant: Q61K | 51 Participants |
Number of Participants With Notable Electrocardiogram (ECG) Values
Criteria for notable ECG values were as follow: QT interval (in millisecond \[msec\]) new (newly occurring post-baseline value) greater than (\>) 450, 480, 500, increase from baseline \>30, increase from baseline \>60; corrected QT interval by Fredericia formula (QTcF) in msec new (newly occurring post-baseline value) \> 450, 480, 500, increase from baseline \>30, increase from baseline \>60; corrected QT interval by Bazett's formula (QTcB) in msec new (newly occurring post-baseline value) \> 450, 480, 500, increase from baseline \>30, increase from baseline \>60; heart rate in bpm new (newly occurring post-baseline value) \<60 and \>100.
Time frame: From baseline up to 77 weeks in binimetinib arm; From baseline up to 61 weeks for dacarbazine arm
Population: The safety set consisted all participants who received at least one dose of the study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline safety evaluation. Here, number analyzed signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure for specified rows.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Binimetinib (MEK162) | Number of Participants With Notable Electrocardiogram (ECG) Values | QT - New > 480 msec | 7 Participants |
| Binimetinib (MEK162) | Number of Participants With Notable Electrocardiogram (ECG) Values | QTcF - Increase from baseline > 60 msec | 9 Participants |
| Binimetinib (MEK162) | Number of Participants With Notable Electrocardiogram (ECG) Values | QTcF - New > 450 msec | 29 Participants |
| Binimetinib (MEK162) | Number of Participants With Notable Electrocardiogram (ECG) Values | QTcB - New > 450 msec | 65 Participants |
| Binimetinib (MEK162) | Number of Participants With Notable Electrocardiogram (ECG) Values | QT - Increase from baseline > 30 msec | 109 Participants |
| Binimetinib (MEK162) | Number of Participants With Notable Electrocardiogram (ECG) Values | QTcB - New > 480 msec | 24 Participants |
| Binimetinib (MEK162) | Number of Participants With Notable Electrocardiogram (ECG) Values | QTcF - New > 480 msec | 10 Participants |
| Binimetinib (MEK162) | Number of Participants With Notable Electrocardiogram (ECG) Values | QTcB - New > 500 msec | 6 Participants |
| Binimetinib (MEK162) | Number of Participants With Notable Electrocardiogram (ECG) Values | QT - New > 500 msec | 5 Participants |
| Binimetinib (MEK162) | Number of Participants With Notable Electrocardiogram (ECG) Values | QTcB - Increase from baseline > 30 msec | 76 Participants |
| Binimetinib (MEK162) | Number of Participants With Notable Electrocardiogram (ECG) Values | QTcF - New > 500 msec | 5 Participants |
| Binimetinib (MEK162) | Number of Participants With Notable Electrocardiogram (ECG) Values | QTcB - Increase from baseline > 60 msec | 11 Participants |
| Binimetinib (MEK162) | Number of Participants With Notable Electrocardiogram (ECG) Values | QT - Increase from baseline > 60 msec | 28 Participants |
| Binimetinib (MEK162) | Number of Participants With Notable Electrocardiogram (ECG) Values | Heart rate - New < 60 bpm | 85 Participants |
| Binimetinib (MEK162) | Number of Participants With Notable Electrocardiogram (ECG) Values | QTcF - Increase from baseline > 30 msec | 52 Participants |
| Binimetinib (MEK162) | Number of Participants With Notable Electrocardiogram (ECG) Values | Heart rate - New > 100 bpm | 18 Participants |
| Binimetinib (MEK162) | Number of Participants With Notable Electrocardiogram (ECG) Values | QT - New > 450 msec | 32 Participants |
| Dacarbazine | Number of Participants With Notable Electrocardiogram (ECG) Values | Heart rate - New > 100 bpm | 16 Participants |
| Dacarbazine | Number of Participants With Notable Electrocardiogram (ECG) Values | QT - New > 450 msec | 8 Participants |
| Dacarbazine | Number of Participants With Notable Electrocardiogram (ECG) Values | QT - New > 480 msec | 1 Participants |
| Dacarbazine | Number of Participants With Notable Electrocardiogram (ECG) Values | QT - New > 500 msec | 0 Participants |
| Dacarbazine | Number of Participants With Notable Electrocardiogram (ECG) Values | QT - Increase from baseline > 30 msec | 33 Participants |
| Dacarbazine | Number of Participants With Notable Electrocardiogram (ECG) Values | QT - Increase from baseline > 60 msec | 5 Participants |
| Dacarbazine | Number of Participants With Notable Electrocardiogram (ECG) Values | QTcF - New > 450 msec | 15 Participants |
| Dacarbazine | Number of Participants With Notable Electrocardiogram (ECG) Values | QTcF - New > 480 msec | 1 Participants |
| Dacarbazine | Number of Participants With Notable Electrocardiogram (ECG) Values | QTcF - New > 500 msec | 1 Participants |
| Dacarbazine | Number of Participants With Notable Electrocardiogram (ECG) Values | QTcF - Increase from baseline > 30 msec | 25 Participants |
| Dacarbazine | Number of Participants With Notable Electrocardiogram (ECG) Values | QTcF - Increase from baseline > 60 msec | 5 Participants |
| Dacarbazine | Number of Participants With Notable Electrocardiogram (ECG) Values | QTcB - New > 450 msec | 26 Participants |
| Dacarbazine | Number of Participants With Notable Electrocardiogram (ECG) Values | QTcB - New > 480 msec | 8 Participants |
| Dacarbazine | Number of Participants With Notable Electrocardiogram (ECG) Values | QTcB - New > 500 msec | 6 Participants |
| Dacarbazine | Number of Participants With Notable Electrocardiogram (ECG) Values | QTcB - Increase from baseline > 30 msec | 36 Participants |
| Dacarbazine | Number of Participants With Notable Electrocardiogram (ECG) Values | QTcB - Increase from baseline > 60 msec | 9 Participants |
| Dacarbazine | Number of Participants With Notable Electrocardiogram (ECG) Values | Heart rate - New < 60 bpm | 13 Participants |
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship with the study treatment. SAE was defined as one of the following: was fatal or life-threatening; resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity; constituted a congenital anomaly/birth defect; was medically significant; required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization. Treatment-emergent AE was defined as an AE with onset date occurring during the on-treatment period. AEs included all SAEs and non-SAEs.
Time frame: From baseline up to 219.4 weeks for binimetinib arm; From baseline up to 123.9 weeks for dacarbazine arm
Population: The safety set consisted all participants who received at least one dose of the study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline safety evaluation.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Binimetinib (MEK162) | Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) | AEs | 269 Participants |
| Binimetinib (MEK162) | Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) | SAEs | 95 Participants |
| Dacarbazine | Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) | AEs | 104 Participants |
| Dacarbazine | Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) | SAEs | 26 Participants |
Overall Response Rate (ORR)
ORR: percentage of participants with best overall response (BOR) of CR or PR. BOR: best response recorded from start of treatment until CR or PR. RECIST V1.1, a) CR: disappearance of all lesions; any pathological lymph nodes (TLs) or non-pathological (non-TLs) must have reduction in short axis to \<10 mm; normalization of tumor marker level for non-TLs; b) PR: \>=30% decrease in sum of diameter of all TLs, taking as reference baseline sum of diameters. ORR is reported for confirmed and unconfirmed responses. Confirmed CR or PR = at least 2 determinations of CR or PR at least 4 weeks apart before PD. PD: \>=20% increase in sum of diameter of all measured target lesions, taking as reference smallest sum of diameter of all TLs recorded at or after baseline, sum must also be absolute increase of \>=5 mm. Unequivocal progression of existing non TLs. Appearance of at least 1 new lesion.
Time frame: From date of randomization until first documented response of CR or PR (maximum up to 77 weeks for binimetinib arm; maximum up to 61 weeks for dacarbazine arm)
Population: FAS consisted of all randomized participants.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Binimetinib (MEK162) | Overall Response Rate (ORR) | Confirmed ORR | 15.2 Percentage of Participants |
| Binimetinib (MEK162) | Overall Response Rate (ORR) | Confirmed + Unconfirmed: ORR | 22.7 Percentage of Participants |
| Dacarbazine | Overall Response Rate (ORR) | Confirmed ORR | 6.8 Percentage of Participants |
| Dacarbazine | Overall Response Rate (ORR) | Confirmed + Unconfirmed: ORR | 9.8 Percentage of Participants |
Overall Survival (OS)
Overall survival was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of death due to any cause. If a participant was not known to have died, overall survival was censored at the date of last known date participant alive.
Time frame: From the date of randomization to the date of death (maximum up to 107 weeks for binimetinib arm; maximum up to 88 weeks for dacarbazine arm)
Population: FAS consisted of all randomized participants.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Binimetinib (MEK162) | Overall Survival (OS) | 10.97 Months |
| Dacarbazine | Overall Survival (OS) | 10.09 Months |
Plasma Concentration of Binimetinib
Time frame: Day 1 of Week 1: Pre-dose, 1, 1.5, 2, 10 hours post-dose; Day 1 of Weeks 4, 7: Pre-dose, 1.5 hours post-dose; Day 1 of Weeks 10, 13: Pre-dose
Population: The pharmacokinetic analysis set (PAS) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of binimetinib and had at least one evaluable post-baseline binimetinib concentration measurement. Here, Overall Number of Participants Analyzed = number of participants evaluable for this outcome measure. This outcome was planned to be evaluated only for binimetinib arm. Here, number analyzed signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure for specified timeframes.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (GEOMETRIC_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Binimetinib (MEK162) | Plasma Concentration of Binimetinib | Week 1 Day 1, Pre-dose | 64.4 Nanogram per milliliter | Geometric Coefficient of Variation 1132.3 |
| Binimetinib (MEK162) | Plasma Concentration of Binimetinib | Week 1 Day 1, 1 hour (hr) Post-dose | 182 Nanogram per milliliter | Geometric Coefficient of Variation 237.6 |
| Binimetinib (MEK162) | Plasma Concentration of Binimetinib | Week 1 Day 1, 1.5 hr Post-dose | 313 Nanogram per milliliter | Geometric Coefficient of Variation 71.6 |
| Binimetinib (MEK162) | Plasma Concentration of Binimetinib | Week 1 Day 1, 2 hr Post-dose | 321 Nanogram per milliliter | Geometric Coefficient of Variation 64.4 |
| Binimetinib (MEK162) | Plasma Concentration of Binimetinib | Week 1 Day 1, 10 hr Post-dose | 153 Nanogram per milliliter | Geometric Coefficient of Variation 52.6 |
| Binimetinib (MEK162) | Plasma Concentration of Binimetinib | Week 4 Day 1, Pre-dose | 101 Nanogram per milliliter | Geometric Coefficient of Variation 100.8 |
| Binimetinib (MEK162) | Plasma Concentration of Binimetinib | Week 4 Day 1, 1.5 hr Post-dose | 418 Nanogram per milliliter | Geometric Coefficient of Variation 51.9 |
| Binimetinib (MEK162) | Plasma Concentration of Binimetinib | Week 7 Day 1, Pre-dose | 101 Nanogram per milliliter | Geometric Coefficient of Variation 97.7 |
| Binimetinib (MEK162) | Plasma Concentration of Binimetinib | Week 7 Day 1, 1.5 hr Post-dose | 372 Nanogram per milliliter | Geometric Coefficient of Variation 63.4 |
| Binimetinib (MEK162) | Plasma Concentration of Binimetinib | Week 10 Day 1, Pre-dose | 92.9 Nanogram per milliliter | Geometric Coefficient of Variation 60.6 |
| Binimetinib (MEK162) | Plasma Concentration of Binimetinib | Week 13 Day 1, Pre-dose | 93.9 Nanogram per milliliter | Geometric Coefficient of Variation 89.8 |
Time to Definitive 10% Deterioration in Global Health Status Score of European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (QLQ-C30)
The time to definitive 10% deterioration was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of event, which was defined as death due to any cause or at least 10% worsening of the corresponding scale score, relative to baseline, with no later improvement above this threshold observed during the course of the study or death due to any cause. If a participant had no event prior to analysis cut-off or start of another anticancer therapy, time to deterioration was censored at the date of the last adequate health related quality of life (HRQoL) evaluation. EORTC QLQ-C30: 5 functional scales (physical, role, cognitive, emotional, and social), a global health status scale, 3 symptom scales (nausea/vomiting, pain, fatigue) and 6 single items (dyspnea, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea and financial difficulties). All scales and single-item measures range =0 to 100. High score for global health status = high quality of life.
Time frame: From baseline up to 77 weeks in binimetinib arm; From baseline up to 61 weeks for dacarbazine arm
Population: FAS consisted of all randomized participants.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Binimetinib (MEK162) | Time to Definitive 10% Deterioration in Global Health Status Score of European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (QLQ-C30) | 2.79 Months |
| Dacarbazine | Time to Definitive 10% Deterioration in Global Health Status Score of European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (QLQ-C30) | 4.27 Months |
Time to Definitive 1 Point Deterioration in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS)
ECOG PS was used to assess the physical health of participants, and ranged from 0 (most active) to 5 (dead). ECOG PS grades: 0= fully active, able to carry on all pre-disease performance without restriction, 1= restricted in physically strenuous activity but ambulatory and able to carry out work of a light or sedentary nature, e.g., light house work, office work, 2= ambulatory and capable of all self-care but unable to carry out any work activities. Up and about more than 50% of waking hours, 3= capable of only limited self-care, confined to bed or chair more than 50% of waking hours, 4=completely disabled. cannot carry on any selfcare. Totally confined to bed or chair and 5= dead. Definitive deterioration is defined as on treatment death due to any cause or decrease in ECOG PS by at least one category from baseline score.
Time frame: From baseline up to 73 weeks 3 days for binimetinib arm; From baseline up to 57 weeks 3 days for dacarbazine arm
Population: The safety set consisted all participants who received at least one dose of the study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline safety evaluation. Here, Overall Number of Participants Analyzed = number of participants evaluable for this outcome measure.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Binimetinib (MEK162) | Time to Definitive 1 Point Deterioration in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS) | NA Months |
| Dacarbazine | Time to Definitive 1 Point Deterioration in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS) | NA Months |
Time to Response (TTR)
TTR: time between date of randomization until first documented response of CR or PR. RECIST V1.1, a) CR: disappearance of all lesions; any pathological lymph nodes (TLs) or non-pathological (non-TLs) must have reduction in short axis to \<10 mm; normalization of tumor marker level for non-TLs; b) PR: \>=30% decrease in sum of diameter (dia) of all TLs, referring baseline sum of dia; c) PD: \>=20% increase in sum of diameter of all measured TLs taking as reference smallest sum of diameter of all TLs recorded at or after baseline, sum must also be absolute increase of \>=5 mm. Unequivocal progression of existing non-TLs. Appearance of \>=1 new lesion. Participants who did not achieve PR or CR censored at last adequate tumor assessment date when they did not have PFS event (time from date of randomization to date of first documented PD or death due to any cause, whichever occur first) or at maximum follow-up when they had PFS event.
Time frame: From date of randomization until first documented response of CR or PR (maximum up to 77 weeks for binimetinib arm; maximum up to 61 weeks for dacarbazine arm)
Population: Analysis population consisted of all randomized participants and who had at least once CR or PR.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Binimetinib (MEK162) | Time to Response (TTR) | 1.45 Months |
| Dacarbazine | Time to Response (TTR) | 2.79 Months |