Skip to content

Study Comparing the Efficacy of MEK162 Versus Dacarbazine in Unresectable or Metastatic NRAS Mutation-positive Melanoma

The NEMO Trial (NRAS Melanoma and MEK Inhibitor):A Randomized Phase III, Open Label, Multicenter, Two-arm Study Comparing the Efficacy of MEK162 Versus Dacarbazine in Patients With Advanced Unresectable or Metastatic NRAS Mutation-positive Melanoma

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01763164
Enrollment
402
Registered
2013-01-08
Start date
2013-07-12
Completion date
2019-06-04
Last updated
2021-03-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Metastatic or Unresectable Cutaneous Melanoma

Keywords

Melanoma, Cutaneous melanoma, Skin disease, Skin cancer, Skin Neoplasms, Neoplasm Metastasis

Brief summary

Two-arm, randomized, prospective, open-label, multi-center, phase III study to compare the efficacy and safety of MEK162 (45 mg BID) versus dacarbazine (1000 mg/m2 IV every 3 weeks) in patients with advanced (Stage IIIC) unresectable or metastatic (Stage IV) NRAS Q61 mutation-positive cutaneous or unknown primary melanoma. The mutation analysis will be performed at a central laboratory. Only those patients with Q61 mutation per central laboratory and meet all eligibility criteria will be randomized. A total of 393 patients will be randomized 2:1 to receive either MEK162 or dacarbazine. Patients will be stratified according to AJCC stage (IIIC, IVM1a, and IVM1b versus IVM1c), ECOG Performance status (0 versus 1) and any prior number of lines of immunotherapy (immunotherapies versus none). This study will use an Interactive Response Technology (IRT). The primary end point of the study is progression-free survival. Key secondary end point is overall survival

Interventions

DRUGMEK162

MEK162 will be administered as a fixed dose of 45 mg (3 x 15 mg tablets) BID, with a glass of water and taken with or without food.

DRUGDacarbazine

Patients randomized to dacarbazine will receive an IV infusion of dacarbazine 1000 mg/m2 over the course of 1 hour on day 1 and then every three weeks.

Sponsors

Pfizer
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Diagnosis of locally advanced, unresectable or metastatic cutaneous or melanoma of unknown primary AJCC Stage IIIC or IV (uveal and mucosal melanoma are excluded) * Presence of NRAS Q61 mutation in tumor tissue prior to randomization as determined by a Novartis designated central laboratory * Naïve untreated patients or patients who have progressed on or after any number of prior lines of immunotherapy for unresectable locally advanced or metastatic melanoma * Evidence of at least one measurable lesion as detected by radiological or photographic methods * Adequate bone marrow, organ function, cardiac and laboratory parameters * Normal functioning of daily living activities

Exclusion criteria

* Any untreated CNS metastases * Uveal or mucosal melanoma * History of or current evidence of retinal vein occlusion (RVO) or risk factors of RVO * Patients with washout period \< 6 weeks from the last dose of ipilimumab or other immunotherapy. * Previous systemic chemotherapy for unresectable locally advanced or metastatic melanoma. * History of Gilbert's syndrome * Prior therapy with a MEK- inhibitor * Impaired cardiovascular function or clinically significant cardiovascular diseases * Uncontrolled arterial hypertension despite medical treatment * HIV positive or active Hepatitis A or B * Impairment of gastrointestinal function * Patients who have undergone major surgery or radiotherapy ≤ 3 weeks prior to starting study drug or who have not recovered from side effects of such procedure; * Patients with neuromuscular disorders that are associated with elevated CK. * Pregnant or nursing (lactating) women * Medical, psychiatric, cognitive or other conditions that may compromise the patient's ability to understand the patient information, give informed consent, comply with the study protocol or complete the study Other protocol-defined inclusion/

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Progression-Free Survival (PFS) by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) v1.1From the date of randomization to the date of the first documented PD or death, whichever occurred first (maximum up to 77 weeks for binimetinib arm; maximum up to 61 weeks for dacarbazine arm)PFS: time from randomization to first documented PD or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. RECIST 1.1, PD: \>=20% increase in sum of diameter of target lesions (TLs) taking as reference the smallest sum on study (including baseline sum), sum must also be an absolute increase of \>=5 mm; unequivocal progression of existing non-TLs; appearance of \>=1 lesion. Complete response (CR): disappearance of all lesions; any pathological lymph nodes (TLs) or non-pathological (non-TLs) must have reduction in short axis to \<10 mm; normalization of tumor marker level for non-TLs. Partial response (PR): \>=30% decrease in sum of diameter of all TLs, referring baseline sum of diameters. Stable disease (SD): neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor increase in lesions qualified for PD referring smallest sum diameter. With no event at time of analysis cut-off or at start of any new anti-neoplastic therapy, PFS censored at date of last adequate tumor assessment of CR, PR or SD.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Overall Response Rate (ORR)From date of randomization until first documented response of CR or PR (maximum up to 77 weeks for binimetinib arm; maximum up to 61 weeks for dacarbazine arm)ORR: percentage of participants with best overall response (BOR) of CR or PR. BOR: best response recorded from start of treatment until CR or PR. RECIST V1.1, a) CR: disappearance of all lesions; any pathological lymph nodes (TLs) or non-pathological (non-TLs) must have reduction in short axis to \<10 mm; normalization of tumor marker level for non-TLs; b) PR: \>=30% decrease in sum of diameter of all TLs, taking as reference baseline sum of diameters. ORR is reported for confirmed and unconfirmed responses. Confirmed CR or PR = at least 2 determinations of CR or PR at least 4 weeks apart before PD. PD: \>=20% increase in sum of diameter of all measured target lesions, taking as reference smallest sum of diameter of all TLs recorded at or after baseline, sum must also be absolute increase of \>=5 mm. Unequivocal progression of existing non TLs. Appearance of at least 1 new lesion.
Time to Response (TTR)From date of randomization until first documented response of CR or PR (maximum up to 77 weeks for binimetinib arm; maximum up to 61 weeks for dacarbazine arm)TTR: time between date of randomization until first documented response of CR or PR. RECIST V1.1, a) CR: disappearance of all lesions; any pathological lymph nodes (TLs) or non-pathological (non-TLs) must have reduction in short axis to \<10 mm; normalization of tumor marker level for non-TLs; b) PR: \>=30% decrease in sum of diameter (dia) of all TLs, referring baseline sum of dia; c) PD: \>=20% increase in sum of diameter of all measured TLs taking as reference smallest sum of diameter of all TLs recorded at or after baseline, sum must also be absolute increase of \>=5 mm. Unequivocal progression of existing non-TLs. Appearance of \>=1 new lesion. Participants who did not achieve PR or CR censored at last adequate tumor assessment date when they did not have PFS event (time from date of randomization to date of first documented PD or death due to any cause, whichever occur first) or at maximum follow-up when they had PFS event.
Duration of Objective Response (DOR)From the date of first documented response (CR or PR) to the first documented progression or death (maximum up to 77 weeks for binimetinib arm; maximum up to 61 weeks for dacarbazine arm)DOR: time from date of first documented response (CR or PR) to first documented progression or death due to underlying cancer. RECIST V1.1, a) CR: disappearance of all lesions; any pathological lymph nodes (TLs) or non-pathological (non-TLs) must have reduction in short axis to \<10 mm; normalization of tumor marker level for non-TLs; b) PR: \>=30% decrease in sum of diameter (dia) of all TLs, referring baseline sum of dia; c) PD: \>=20% increase in sum of diameter of all measured target lesions taking as reference smallest sum of diameter of all target lesions recorded at or after baseline, sum must also be absolute increase of \>=5 mm. Unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. Appearance of at least 1 new lesion. If a participant with a CR or PR had no PD or death due to underlying cancer, participants was censored at date of last adequate tumor assessment.
Disease Control Rate (DCR)From date of randomization until first documented response of CR, PR, SD or non-CR/non-PD (maximum up to 77 weeks for binimetinib arm; maximum up to 61 weeks for dacarbazine arm)DCR was calculated as the percentage of participants with a BOR of CR, PR, SD RECIST V1.1, a) CR: disappearance of all lesions; any pathological lymph nodes (TLs) or non-pathological (non-TLs) must have reduction in short axis to \<10 mm; normalization of tumor marker level for non-TLs; b) PR: \>=30% decrease in sum of diameter of all target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters; c) SD: neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR or CR nor an increase in lesions which would qualify for PD taking as reference the smallest sum diameters; d) PD: \>=20% increase in sum of diameter of all measured target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum of diameter of all target lesions recorded at or after baseline, sum must also be absolute increase of \>=5 mm. Unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. Appearance of at least 1 new lesion.
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)From baseline up to 219.4 weeks for binimetinib arm; From baseline up to 123.9 weeks for dacarbazine armAn AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship with the study treatment. SAE was defined as one of the following: was fatal or life-threatening; resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity; constituted a congenital anomaly/birth defect; was medically significant; required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization. Treatment-emergent AE was defined as an AE with onset date occurring during the on-treatment period. AEs included all SAEs and non-SAEs.
Number of Participants With Clinically Notable Hematology Shifts Based on National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria (NCI-CTCAE) Grade, Version 4.03From baseline up to 77 weeks in binimetinib arm; From baseline up to 61 weeks for dacarbazine armClinically notable shifts are defined as worsening by at least 2 grades or to \>= grade 3. Severity was graded as Grade 1: asymptomatic or mild symptoms, clinical or diagnostic observations only, intervention not indicated; Grade 2: moderate, minimal, local or noninvasive intervention indicated, limiting age-appropriate instrumental activities of daily life (ADL); Grade 3: severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening, hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization indicated, disabling, limiting self-care ADL; Grade 4: life-threatening consequence, urgent intervention indicated; Grade 5: death related to AE.
Number of Participants With Clinically Notable Clinical Chemistry/Biochemistry Shifts Based on NCI-CTCAE Grade, Version 4.03From baseline up to 77 weeks in binimetinib arm; From baseline up to 61 weeks for dacarbazine armClinically notable shifts are defined as worsening by at least 2 grades or to \>= grade 3. Severity was graded as Grade 1: asymptomatic or mild symptoms, clinical or diagnostic observations only, intervention not indicated; Grade 2: moderate, minimal, local or noninvasive intervention indicated, limiting age-appropriate instrumental ADL; Grade 3: severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening, hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization indicated, disabling, limiting self-care ADL; Grade 4: life-threatening consequence, urgent intervention indicated; Grade 5: death related to AE.
Number of Participants With Clinically Notable Vital SignsFrom baseline up to 77 weeks in binimetinib arm; From baseline up to 61 weeks for dacarbazine armAbnormalities criteria included: low/high pulse rate (beats per minute \[bpm\]):\<=50bpm with decrease from baseline \>=15bpm/\>=120bpm with increase from baseline \>=15bpm; Low/high systolic blood pressure (millimeters of mercury \[mmHg\]): \<=90mmHg with decrease from baseline \>=20mmHg/\>=160mmHg with increase from baseline \>=20mmHg; Low/high diastolic blood pressure \[mmHg\]: \<=50mmHg with decrease from baseline \>=15mmHg/\>=100mmHg with increase from baseline \>=15mmHg; Low/high body weight (kilogram \[kg\]): \>=20% decrease from baseline / \>=10% increase from baseline; Low/high body temperature (degree Celsius \[°C\]): \<=36°C / \>= 37.5°C
Number of Participants With Notable Electrocardiogram (ECG) ValuesFrom baseline up to 77 weeks in binimetinib arm; From baseline up to 61 weeks for dacarbazine armCriteria for notable ECG values were as follow: QT interval (in millisecond \[msec\]) new (newly occurring post-baseline value) greater than (\>) 450, 480, 500, increase from baseline \>30, increase from baseline \>60; corrected QT interval by Fredericia formula (QTcF) in msec new (newly occurring post-baseline value) \> 450, 480, 500, increase from baseline \>30, increase from baseline \>60; corrected QT interval by Bazett's formula (QTcB) in msec new (newly occurring post-baseline value) \> 450, 480, 500, increase from baseline \>30, increase from baseline \>60; heart rate in bpm new (newly occurring post-baseline value) \<60 and \>100.
Overall Survival (OS)From the date of randomization to the date of death (maximum up to 107 weeks for binimetinib arm; maximum up to 88 weeks for dacarbazine arm)Overall survival was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of death due to any cause. If a participant was not known to have died, overall survival was censored at the date of last known date participant alive.
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Findings in Physical ExaminationFrom baseline up to 77 weeks in binimetinib arm; From baseline up to 61 weeks for dacarbazine armA complete physical examination included the examination of general appearance, skin, neck (including thyroid), eyes, ears, nose, throat, lungs, heart, abdomen, back, lymph nodes, extremities, vascular and neurological systems. If indicated based on medical history and/or symptoms, rectal, external genitalia, breast, and pelvic examinations were performed. Clinical significance in physical examination was reported as adverse events.
Number of Participants With Adverse Events of Special Interest: Ocular EventsFrom baseline up to 77 weeks in binimetinib arm; From baseline up to 61 weeks for dacarbazine armAn AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship with the study treatment. Grade 1: Asymptomatic or mild symptoms; clinical or diagnostic observations only; intervention not indicated; Grade 2: Moderate; minimal, local or noninvasive intervention indicated; limiting age appropriate instrumental ADL; Grade 3: Severe or medically significant but not immediately sight threatening; Hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization indicated; disabling; limiting self-care ADL; Grade 4: Sight-threatening consequences; urgent intervention indicated; blindness (20/200 or worse) in the affected eye. Here, in this outcome measure data is reported for events falling in any of the grades.
Plasma Concentration of BinimetinibDay 1 of Week 1: Pre-dose, 1, 1.5, 2, 10 hours post-dose; Day 1 of Weeks 4, 7: Pre-dose, 1.5 hours post-dose; Day 1 of Weeks 10, 13: Pre-dose
Time to Definitive 10% Deterioration in Global Health Status Score of European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (QLQ-C30)From baseline up to 77 weeks in binimetinib arm; From baseline up to 61 weeks for dacarbazine armThe time to definitive 10% deterioration was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of event, which was defined as death due to any cause or at least 10% worsening of the corresponding scale score, relative to baseline, with no later improvement above this threshold observed during the course of the study or death due to any cause. If a participant had no event prior to analysis cut-off or start of another anticancer therapy, time to deterioration was censored at the date of the last adequate health related quality of life (HRQoL) evaluation. EORTC QLQ-C30: 5 functional scales (physical, role, cognitive, emotional, and social), a global health status scale, 3 symptom scales (nausea/vomiting, pain, fatigue) and 6 single items (dyspnea, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea and financial difficulties). All scales and single-item measures range =0 to 100. High score for global health status = high quality of life.
Change From Baseline in Global Health Status Score of EORTC QLQ-C30 at Weeks 4, 7, 13, 19, 25, 34, 43, 52, 61, 70, End of Treatment, Safety Follow-up Visit, Post-Treatment Follow-up Visit 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6Both arms: Baseline, Day 1 Treatment Week (TW) 4,7,13,19,25,34,43,52; Post-treatment follow-up Visit (FUV) 1 to 6; Binimetinib: Day 1 TW61,70; End of treatment (EOT= TW73); Safety FUV=30 days post TW73; Dacarbazine: EOT=TW 57;Safety FUV=30 days post TW57EORTC QLQ-C30: 5 functional scales (physical, role, cognitive, emotional, and social), a h global health status scale, 3 symptom scales (nausea/vomiting, pain, fatigue) and 6 single items (dyspnea, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea and financial difficulties). All scales and single-item measures range =0 to 100. High score for global health status = high quality of life. Post-treatment tumor assessments follow up visits occurred at every 9 weeks if participants started new anticancer therapy.
Change From Baseline in EuroQoL-5 Dimensions- 5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L) Index Score at Weeks 4, 7, 13, 19, 25, 34, 43, 52, 61, 70, End of Treatment, Safety Follow-up Visit, Post-treatment Follow-up Visit 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6Both arms: Baseline, Day 1 Treatment Week (TW) 4,7,13,19,25,34,43,52; Post-treatment follow-up Visit (FUV) 1 to 6; Binimetinib: Day 1 TW61,70; End of treatment (EOT= TW73); Safety FUV=30 days post TW73; Dacarbazine: EOT=TW 57;Safety FUV=30 days post TW57EQ-5D-5L, is a standardized measure of health utility that provides a single index value for one's health status. EQ-5D-5L contained 1 item for each of 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 5 levels: 1= no problems, 2= slight problems, 3= moderate problems, 4= severe problems, and 5= extreme problems. Index score: participant responses to the 5 dimensions reflected a specific health state that corresponded to a population preference weight for that state on a continuous scale of 0 (death) to 1 (perfect health). Higher index scores = better health state. Post-treatment tumor assessments follow up visits occurred at every 9 weeks if participants started new anticancer therapy.
Time to Definitive 1 Point Deterioration in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS)From baseline up to 73 weeks 3 days for binimetinib arm; From baseline up to 57 weeks 3 days for dacarbazine armECOG PS was used to assess the physical health of participants, and ranged from 0 (most active) to 5 (dead). ECOG PS grades: 0= fully active, able to carry on all pre-disease performance without restriction, 1= restricted in physically strenuous activity but ambulatory and able to carry out work of a light or sedentary nature, e.g., light house work, office work, 2= ambulatory and capable of all self-care but unable to carry out any work activities. Up and about more than 50% of waking hours, 3= capable of only limited self-care, confined to bed or chair more than 50% of waking hours, 4=completely disabled. cannot carry on any selfcare. Totally confined to bed or chair and 5= dead. Definitive deterioration is defined as on treatment death due to any cause or decrease in ECOG PS by at least one category from baseline score.
Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS)For both arms: Baseline, Weeks 4, 7, 10, 13, 16, 19, 22, 25, 28, 31, 34, 37, 40, 43, 46, 49, 52, 55 and 30-day Follow-up For binimetinib only: Weeks 58, 61, 64, 67, 70, 73ECOG PS was used to assess the physical health of participants, and ranged from 0 (most active) to 5 (dead). ECOG PS grades: 0= fully active, able to carry on all pre-disease performance without restriction, 1= restricted in physically strenuous activity but ambulatory and able to carry out work of a light or sedentary nature, e.g., light house work, office work, 2= ambulatory and capable of all self-care but unable to carry out any work activities. Up and about more than 50% of waking hours, 3= capable of only limited self-care, 4=completely disabled. cannot carry on any selfcare. Totally confined to bed or chair confined to bed or chair more than 50% of waking hours and 5= dead. Post-treatment tumor assessments follow up visits occurred at every 9 weeks if participants started new anticancer therapy.
Number of Participants With Neuroblastoma RAS Viral (V-ras) Oncogene Homolog (NRAS) Mutation Status at BaselineBaselineNumber of participants with NRAS mutation status at baseline were reported.
Number of Participants With Adverse Events of Special Interest: Cardiac EventsFrom baseline up to 77 weeks in binimetinib arm; From baseline up to 61 weeks for dacarbazine armAn AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship with the study treatment. Grade 1: asymptomatic or mild symptoms, clinical or diagnostic observations only, intervention not indicated; Grade 2: moderate, minimal, local or noninvasive intervention indicated, limiting age-appropriate instrumental activities of daily life (ADL); Grade 3: severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening, hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization indicated, disabling, limiting self-care ADL; Grade 4: life-threatening consequence, urgent intervention indicated; Grade 5: death related to AE. Here, in this outcome measure data is reported for events falling in any of the grades.

Countries

Argentina, Australia, Austria, Belgium, Brazil, Canada, Czechia, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Israel, Italy, Japan, Netherlands, Poland, Portugal, Russia, Slovakia, South Africa, South Korea, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey (Türkiye), United Kingdom, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Participants randomized were with previously untreated, advanced unresectable or metastatic Neuroblastoma RAS viral oncogene homolog (NRAS) mutation-positive melanoma as confirmed by central assessment.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Binimetinib (MEK162)
Participants received oral binimetinib 45 milligram (mg) (3\*15 mg tablets) twice daily, until disease progression (PD), unacceptable toxicity, death, physician decision, study termination or discontinuation due to any other reason (e.g., withdrawal of consent, lost to follow-up, start of a new anti-cancer therapy). Maximum duration of binimetinib treatment exposure in the study was 215.4 weeks and participants were followed up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment. Participants who discontinued study treatment due to start of a new anti-cancer therapy, were followed up at every 9 weeks until documented progression per Blinded Independent Review Committee (BIRC), withdrawal of consent, lost to follow-up, study closure or death whichever occurred first.
269
Dacarbazine
Participants received intravenous (IV) dacarbazine 1000 mg per square meter (mg/m\^2) once every 3 weeks until PD, unacceptable toxicity, death, physician decision, study termination or discontinuation due to any other reason (e.g., withdrawal of consent, lost to follow-up, start of a new anti-cancer therapy). Maximum duration of dacarbazine treatment exposure in the study was 119.9 weeks and participants were followed up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment. Participants who discontinued study treatment due to start of a new anti-cancer therapy, were followed up at every 9 weeks until documented progression per BIRC, withdrawal of consent, lost to follow-up, study closure or death whichever occurred first.
133
Total402

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Follow up PhaseAdverse Event171
Follow up PhaseDeath214
Follow up PhaseLost to Follow-up10
Follow up PhaseNew therapy for study indication123
Follow up PhasePhysician Decision103
Follow up PhaseProgressive disease12762
Follow up PhaseSubject/guardian decision92
Treatment PhaseAdverse Event668
Treatment PhaseDeath101
Treatment PhaseOther01
Treatment PhaseParticipant/Guardian decision2614
Treatment PhasePhysician Decision2413
Treatment PhaseProgressive Disease14276
Treatment PhaseProtocol Violation11
Treatment PhaseRandomized but not Treated019

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicBinimetinib (MEK162)DacarbazineTotal
Age, Continuous63.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.28
60.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.35
62.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.71
Sex: Female, Male
Female
103 Participants48 Participants151 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
166 Participants85 Participants251 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
266 / 269100 / 114
serious
Total, serious adverse events
95 / 26926 / 114

Outcome results

Primary

Progression-Free Survival (PFS) by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) v1.1

PFS: time from randomization to first documented PD or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. RECIST 1.1, PD: \>=20% increase in sum of diameter of target lesions (TLs) taking as reference the smallest sum on study (including baseline sum), sum must also be an absolute increase of \>=5 mm; unequivocal progression of existing non-TLs; appearance of \>=1 lesion. Complete response (CR): disappearance of all lesions; any pathological lymph nodes (TLs) or non-pathological (non-TLs) must have reduction in short axis to \<10 mm; normalization of tumor marker level for non-TLs. Partial response (PR): \>=30% decrease in sum of diameter of all TLs, referring baseline sum of diameters. Stable disease (SD): neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor increase in lesions qualified for PD referring smallest sum diameter. With no event at time of analysis cut-off or at start of any new anti-neoplastic therapy, PFS censored at date of last adequate tumor assessment of CR, PR or SD.

Time frame: From the date of randomization to the date of the first documented PD or death, whichever occurred first (maximum up to 77 weeks for binimetinib arm; maximum up to 61 weeks for dacarbazine arm)

Population: FAS consisted of all randomized participants.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Binimetinib (MEK162)Progression-Free Survival (PFS) by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) v1.12.83 Months
DacarbazineProgression-Free Survival (PFS) by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) v1.11.51 Months
Comparison: Hazard ratio was obtained from the stratified unadjusted Cox model. P-value was obtained from the one-sided stratified log-rank test.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [0.47, 0.8]Log Rank
Secondary

Change From Baseline in EuroQoL-5 Dimensions- 5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L) Index Score at Weeks 4, 7, 13, 19, 25, 34, 43, 52, 61, 70, End of Treatment, Safety Follow-up Visit, Post-treatment Follow-up Visit 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6

EQ-5D-5L, is a standardized measure of health utility that provides a single index value for one's health status. EQ-5D-5L contained 1 item for each of 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 5 levels: 1= no problems, 2= slight problems, 3= moderate problems, 4= severe problems, and 5= extreme problems. Index score: participant responses to the 5 dimensions reflected a specific health state that corresponded to a population preference weight for that state on a continuous scale of 0 (death) to 1 (perfect health). Higher index scores = better health state. Post-treatment tumor assessments follow up visits occurred at every 9 weeks if participants started new anticancer therapy.

Time frame: Both arms: Baseline, Day 1 Treatment Week (TW) 4,7,13,19,25,34,43,52; Post-treatment follow-up Visit (FUV) 1 to 6; Binimetinib: Day 1 TW61,70; End of treatment (EOT= TW73); Safety FUV=30 days post TW73; Dacarbazine: EOT=TW 57;Safety FUV=30 days post TW57

Population: FAS consisted of all randomized participants. Here, Number analyzed signifies number of participants evaluable at specified time points.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Binimetinib (MEK162)Change From Baseline in EuroQoL-5 Dimensions- 5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L) Index Score at Weeks 4, 7, 13, 19, 25, 34, 43, 52, 61, 70, End of Treatment, Safety Follow-up Visit, Post-treatment Follow-up Visit 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6Baseline0.7780 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.22464
Binimetinib (MEK162)Change From Baseline in EuroQoL-5 Dimensions- 5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L) Index Score at Weeks 4, 7, 13, 19, 25, 34, 43, 52, 61, 70, End of Treatment, Safety Follow-up Visit, Post-treatment Follow-up Visit 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6Week 43 Day 1-0.0170 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.22978
Binimetinib (MEK162)Change From Baseline in EuroQoL-5 Dimensions- 5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L) Index Score at Weeks 4, 7, 13, 19, 25, 34, 43, 52, 61, 70, End of Treatment, Safety Follow-up Visit, Post-treatment Follow-up Visit 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6Week 52 Day 1-0.0389 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.24609
Binimetinib (MEK162)Change From Baseline in EuroQoL-5 Dimensions- 5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L) Index Score at Weeks 4, 7, 13, 19, 25, 34, 43, 52, 61, 70, End of Treatment, Safety Follow-up Visit, Post-treatment Follow-up Visit 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6Week 61 Day 10.0690 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.2108
Binimetinib (MEK162)Change From Baseline in EuroQoL-5 Dimensions- 5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L) Index Score at Weeks 4, 7, 13, 19, 25, 34, 43, 52, 61, 70, End of Treatment, Safety Follow-up Visit, Post-treatment Follow-up Visit 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6Week 70 Day 10.0120 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.14001
Binimetinib (MEK162)Change From Baseline in EuroQoL-5 Dimensions- 5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L) Index Score at Weeks 4, 7, 13, 19, 25, 34, 43, 52, 61, 70, End of Treatment, Safety Follow-up Visit, Post-treatment Follow-up Visit 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6End of Treatment-0.0978 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.23931
Binimetinib (MEK162)Change From Baseline in EuroQoL-5 Dimensions- 5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L) Index Score at Weeks 4, 7, 13, 19, 25, 34, 43, 52, 61, 70, End of Treatment, Safety Follow-up Visit, Post-treatment Follow-up Visit 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 630-day safety follow-up-0.1165 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.2441
Binimetinib (MEK162)Change From Baseline in EuroQoL-5 Dimensions- 5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L) Index Score at Weeks 4, 7, 13, 19, 25, 34, 43, 52, 61, 70, End of Treatment, Safety Follow-up Visit, Post-treatment Follow-up Visit 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6Post treatment follow-up 1-0.0820 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.11993
Binimetinib (MEK162)Change From Baseline in EuroQoL-5 Dimensions- 5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L) Index Score at Weeks 4, 7, 13, 19, 25, 34, 43, 52, 61, 70, End of Treatment, Safety Follow-up Visit, Post-treatment Follow-up Visit 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6Post treatment follow-up 2-0.2480 Units on a scale
Binimetinib (MEK162)Change From Baseline in EuroQoL-5 Dimensions- 5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L) Index Score at Weeks 4, 7, 13, 19, 25, 34, 43, 52, 61, 70, End of Treatment, Safety Follow-up Visit, Post-treatment Follow-up Visit 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6Post treatment follow-up 3-0.1210 Units on a scale
Binimetinib (MEK162)Change From Baseline in EuroQoL-5 Dimensions- 5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L) Index Score at Weeks 4, 7, 13, 19, 25, 34, 43, 52, 61, 70, End of Treatment, Safety Follow-up Visit, Post-treatment Follow-up Visit 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6Post treatment follow-up 40.1115 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.15768
Binimetinib (MEK162)Change From Baseline in EuroQoL-5 Dimensions- 5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L) Index Score at Weeks 4, 7, 13, 19, 25, 34, 43, 52, 61, 70, End of Treatment, Safety Follow-up Visit, Post-treatment Follow-up Visit 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6Post treatment follow-up 50.1730 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.24466
Binimetinib (MEK162)Change From Baseline in EuroQoL-5 Dimensions- 5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L) Index Score at Weeks 4, 7, 13, 19, 25, 34, 43, 52, 61, 70, End of Treatment, Safety Follow-up Visit, Post-treatment Follow-up Visit 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6Post treatment follow-up 60.2230 Units on a scale
Binimetinib (MEK162)Change From Baseline in EuroQoL-5 Dimensions- 5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L) Index Score at Weeks 4, 7, 13, 19, 25, 34, 43, 52, 61, 70, End of Treatment, Safety Follow-up Visit, Post-treatment Follow-up Visit 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6Week 4 Day 1-0.0422 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.18291
Binimetinib (MEK162)Change From Baseline in EuroQoL-5 Dimensions- 5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L) Index Score at Weeks 4, 7, 13, 19, 25, 34, 43, 52, 61, 70, End of Treatment, Safety Follow-up Visit, Post-treatment Follow-up Visit 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6Week 7 Day 1-0.0397 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.19154
Binimetinib (MEK162)Change From Baseline in EuroQoL-5 Dimensions- 5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L) Index Score at Weeks 4, 7, 13, 19, 25, 34, 43, 52, 61, 70, End of Treatment, Safety Follow-up Visit, Post-treatment Follow-up Visit 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6Week 13 Day 1-0.0773 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.17543
Binimetinib (MEK162)Change From Baseline in EuroQoL-5 Dimensions- 5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L) Index Score at Weeks 4, 7, 13, 19, 25, 34, 43, 52, 61, 70, End of Treatment, Safety Follow-up Visit, Post-treatment Follow-up Visit 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6Week 19 Day 1-0.0576 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.22503
Binimetinib (MEK162)Change From Baseline in EuroQoL-5 Dimensions- 5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L) Index Score at Weeks 4, 7, 13, 19, 25, 34, 43, 52, 61, 70, End of Treatment, Safety Follow-up Visit, Post-treatment Follow-up Visit 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6Week 25 Day 1-0.1563 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.32142
Binimetinib (MEK162)Change From Baseline in EuroQoL-5 Dimensions- 5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L) Index Score at Weeks 4, 7, 13, 19, 25, 34, 43, 52, 61, 70, End of Treatment, Safety Follow-up Visit, Post-treatment Follow-up Visit 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6Week 34 Day 1-0.0801 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.11141
DacarbazineChange From Baseline in EuroQoL-5 Dimensions- 5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L) Index Score at Weeks 4, 7, 13, 19, 25, 34, 43, 52, 61, 70, End of Treatment, Safety Follow-up Visit, Post-treatment Follow-up Visit 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6Baseline0.7657 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.23003
DacarbazineChange From Baseline in EuroQoL-5 Dimensions- 5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L) Index Score at Weeks 4, 7, 13, 19, 25, 34, 43, 52, 61, 70, End of Treatment, Safety Follow-up Visit, Post-treatment Follow-up Visit 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6Week 34 Day 10.0617 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.15254
DacarbazineChange From Baseline in EuroQoL-5 Dimensions- 5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L) Index Score at Weeks 4, 7, 13, 19, 25, 34, 43, 52, 61, 70, End of Treatment, Safety Follow-up Visit, Post-treatment Follow-up Visit 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6Week 4 Day 10.0110 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.12135
DacarbazineChange From Baseline in EuroQoL-5 Dimensions- 5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L) Index Score at Weeks 4, 7, 13, 19, 25, 34, 43, 52, 61, 70, End of Treatment, Safety Follow-up Visit, Post-treatment Follow-up Visit 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6Post treatment follow-up 1-0.0438 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.25374
DacarbazineChange From Baseline in EuroQoL-5 Dimensions- 5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L) Index Score at Weeks 4, 7, 13, 19, 25, 34, 43, 52, 61, 70, End of Treatment, Safety Follow-up Visit, Post-treatment Follow-up Visit 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6Week 7 Day 10.0132 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.14084
DacarbazineChange From Baseline in EuroQoL-5 Dimensions- 5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L) Index Score at Weeks 4, 7, 13, 19, 25, 34, 43, 52, 61, 70, End of Treatment, Safety Follow-up Visit, Post-treatment Follow-up Visit 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6Week 43 Day 10.1060 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.15033
DacarbazineChange From Baseline in EuroQoL-5 Dimensions- 5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L) Index Score at Weeks 4, 7, 13, 19, 25, 34, 43, 52, 61, 70, End of Treatment, Safety Follow-up Visit, Post-treatment Follow-up Visit 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6Week 13 Day 10.0198 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.15236
DacarbazineChange From Baseline in EuroQoL-5 Dimensions- 5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L) Index Score at Weeks 4, 7, 13, 19, 25, 34, 43, 52, 61, 70, End of Treatment, Safety Follow-up Visit, Post-treatment Follow-up Visit 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 630-day safety follow-up-0.0740 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.17682
DacarbazineChange From Baseline in EuroQoL-5 Dimensions- 5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L) Index Score at Weeks 4, 7, 13, 19, 25, 34, 43, 52, 61, 70, End of Treatment, Safety Follow-up Visit, Post-treatment Follow-up Visit 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6Week 19 Day 10.0257 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.18052
DacarbazineChange From Baseline in EuroQoL-5 Dimensions- 5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L) Index Score at Weeks 4, 7, 13, 19, 25, 34, 43, 52, 61, 70, End of Treatment, Safety Follow-up Visit, Post-treatment Follow-up Visit 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6Week 52 Day 10.0000 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
DacarbazineChange From Baseline in EuroQoL-5 Dimensions- 5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L) Index Score at Weeks 4, 7, 13, 19, 25, 34, 43, 52, 61, 70, End of Treatment, Safety Follow-up Visit, Post-treatment Follow-up Visit 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6Week 25 Day 10.0657 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.16052
DacarbazineChange From Baseline in EuroQoL-5 Dimensions- 5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L) Index Score at Weeks 4, 7, 13, 19, 25, 34, 43, 52, 61, 70, End of Treatment, Safety Follow-up Visit, Post-treatment Follow-up Visit 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6End of Treatment-0.0540 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.19164
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Global Health Status Score of EORTC QLQ-C30 at Weeks 4, 7, 13, 19, 25, 34, 43, 52, 61, 70, End of Treatment, Safety Follow-up Visit, Post-Treatment Follow-up Visit 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6

EORTC QLQ-C30: 5 functional scales (physical, role, cognitive, emotional, and social), a h global health status scale, 3 symptom scales (nausea/vomiting, pain, fatigue) and 6 single items (dyspnea, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea and financial difficulties). All scales and single-item measures range =0 to 100. High score for global health status = high quality of life. Post-treatment tumor assessments follow up visits occurred at every 9 weeks if participants started new anticancer therapy.

Time frame: Both arms: Baseline, Day 1 Treatment Week (TW) 4,7,13,19,25,34,43,52; Post-treatment follow-up Visit (FUV) 1 to 6; Binimetinib: Day 1 TW61,70; End of treatment (EOT= TW73); Safety FUV=30 days post TW73; Dacarbazine: EOT=TW 57;Safety FUV=30 days post TW57

Population: FAS consisted of all randomized participants. Here, Number analyzed signifies number of participants evaluable at specified time points.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Binimetinib (MEK162)Change From Baseline in Global Health Status Score of EORTC QLQ-C30 at Weeks 4, 7, 13, 19, 25, 34, 43, 52, 61, 70, End of Treatment, Safety Follow-up Visit, Post-Treatment Follow-up Visit 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6Post treatment follow-up 633.33 Units on a scale
Binimetinib (MEK162)Change From Baseline in Global Health Status Score of EORTC QLQ-C30 at Weeks 4, 7, 13, 19, 25, 34, 43, 52, 61, 70, End of Treatment, Safety Follow-up Visit, Post-Treatment Follow-up Visit 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6Baseline68.35 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.463
Binimetinib (MEK162)Change From Baseline in Global Health Status Score of EORTC QLQ-C30 at Weeks 4, 7, 13, 19, 25, 34, 43, 52, 61, 70, End of Treatment, Safety Follow-up Visit, Post-Treatment Follow-up Visit 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6Week 34 Day 1-6.25 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.755
Binimetinib (MEK162)Change From Baseline in Global Health Status Score of EORTC QLQ-C30 at Weeks 4, 7, 13, 19, 25, 34, 43, 52, 61, 70, End of Treatment, Safety Follow-up Visit, Post-Treatment Follow-up Visit 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6Week 43 Day 1-11.36 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.841
Binimetinib (MEK162)Change From Baseline in Global Health Status Score of EORTC QLQ-C30 at Weeks 4, 7, 13, 19, 25, 34, 43, 52, 61, 70, End of Treatment, Safety Follow-up Visit, Post-Treatment Follow-up Visit 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6Week 52 Day 1-1.52 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.006
Binimetinib (MEK162)Change From Baseline in Global Health Status Score of EORTC QLQ-C30 at Weeks 4, 7, 13, 19, 25, 34, 43, 52, 61, 70, End of Treatment, Safety Follow-up Visit, Post-Treatment Follow-up Visit 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6Week 61 Day 1-10.00 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.066
Binimetinib (MEK162)Change From Baseline in Global Health Status Score of EORTC QLQ-C30 at Weeks 4, 7, 13, 19, 25, 34, 43, 52, 61, 70, End of Treatment, Safety Follow-up Visit, Post-Treatment Follow-up Visit 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6Week 70 Day 1-20.83 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.893
Binimetinib (MEK162)Change From Baseline in Global Health Status Score of EORTC QLQ-C30 at Weeks 4, 7, 13, 19, 25, 34, 43, 52, 61, 70, End of Treatment, Safety Follow-up Visit, Post-Treatment Follow-up Visit 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6End of Treatment-12.20 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.512
Binimetinib (MEK162)Change From Baseline in Global Health Status Score of EORTC QLQ-C30 at Weeks 4, 7, 13, 19, 25, 34, 43, 52, 61, 70, End of Treatment, Safety Follow-up Visit, Post-Treatment Follow-up Visit 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 630-day safety follow-up-8.10 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.361
Binimetinib (MEK162)Change From Baseline in Global Health Status Score of EORTC QLQ-C30 at Weeks 4, 7, 13, 19, 25, 34, 43, 52, 61, 70, End of Treatment, Safety Follow-up Visit, Post-Treatment Follow-up Visit 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6Post treatment follow-up 1-5.95 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.211
Binimetinib (MEK162)Change From Baseline in Global Health Status Score of EORTC QLQ-C30 at Weeks 4, 7, 13, 19, 25, 34, 43, 52, 61, 70, End of Treatment, Safety Follow-up Visit, Post-Treatment Follow-up Visit 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6Post treatment follow-up 20.00 Units on a scale
Binimetinib (MEK162)Change From Baseline in Global Health Status Score of EORTC QLQ-C30 at Weeks 4, 7, 13, 19, 25, 34, 43, 52, 61, 70, End of Treatment, Safety Follow-up Visit, Post-Treatment Follow-up Visit 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6Post treatment follow-up 316.67 Units on a scale
Binimetinib (MEK162)Change From Baseline in Global Health Status Score of EORTC QLQ-C30 at Weeks 4, 7, 13, 19, 25, 34, 43, 52, 61, 70, End of Treatment, Safety Follow-up Visit, Post-Treatment Follow-up Visit 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6Post treatment follow-up 425.00 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.785
Binimetinib (MEK162)Change From Baseline in Global Health Status Score of EORTC QLQ-C30 at Weeks 4, 7, 13, 19, 25, 34, 43, 52, 61, 70, End of Treatment, Safety Follow-up Visit, Post-Treatment Follow-up Visit 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6Post treatment follow-up 525.00 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.785
Binimetinib (MEK162)Change From Baseline in Global Health Status Score of EORTC QLQ-C30 at Weeks 4, 7, 13, 19, 25, 34, 43, 52, 61, 70, End of Treatment, Safety Follow-up Visit, Post-Treatment Follow-up Visit 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6Week 4 Day 1-5.75 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.285
Binimetinib (MEK162)Change From Baseline in Global Health Status Score of EORTC QLQ-C30 at Weeks 4, 7, 13, 19, 25, 34, 43, 52, 61, 70, End of Treatment, Safety Follow-up Visit, Post-Treatment Follow-up Visit 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6Week 7 Day 1-8.63 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.562
Binimetinib (MEK162)Change From Baseline in Global Health Status Score of EORTC QLQ-C30 at Weeks 4, 7, 13, 19, 25, 34, 43, 52, 61, 70, End of Treatment, Safety Follow-up Visit, Post-Treatment Follow-up Visit 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6Week 13 Day 1-8.28 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.659
Binimetinib (MEK162)Change From Baseline in Global Health Status Score of EORTC QLQ-C30 at Weeks 4, 7, 13, 19, 25, 34, 43, 52, 61, 70, End of Treatment, Safety Follow-up Visit, Post-Treatment Follow-up Visit 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6Week 19 Day 1-8.05 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.053
Binimetinib (MEK162)Change From Baseline in Global Health Status Score of EORTC QLQ-C30 at Weeks 4, 7, 13, 19, 25, 34, 43, 52, 61, 70, End of Treatment, Safety Follow-up Visit, Post-Treatment Follow-up Visit 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6Week 25 Day 1-10.58 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.775
DacarbazineChange From Baseline in Global Health Status Score of EORTC QLQ-C30 at Weeks 4, 7, 13, 19, 25, 34, 43, 52, 61, 70, End of Treatment, Safety Follow-up Visit, Post-Treatment Follow-up Visit 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6Baseline70.50 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.823
DacarbazineChange From Baseline in Global Health Status Score of EORTC QLQ-C30 at Weeks 4, 7, 13, 19, 25, 34, 43, 52, 61, 70, End of Treatment, Safety Follow-up Visit, Post-Treatment Follow-up Visit 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6Week 34 Day 13.57 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.893
DacarbazineChange From Baseline in Global Health Status Score of EORTC QLQ-C30 at Weeks 4, 7, 13, 19, 25, 34, 43, 52, 61, 70, End of Treatment, Safety Follow-up Visit, Post-Treatment Follow-up Visit 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6Week 4 Day 1-1.81 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.512
DacarbazineChange From Baseline in Global Health Status Score of EORTC QLQ-C30 at Weeks 4, 7, 13, 19, 25, 34, 43, 52, 61, 70, End of Treatment, Safety Follow-up Visit, Post-Treatment Follow-up Visit 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6Post treatment follow-up 1-8.59 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.218
DacarbazineChange From Baseline in Global Health Status Score of EORTC QLQ-C30 at Weeks 4, 7, 13, 19, 25, 34, 43, 52, 61, 70, End of Treatment, Safety Follow-up Visit, Post-Treatment Follow-up Visit 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6Week 7 Day 10.00 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.691
DacarbazineChange From Baseline in Global Health Status Score of EORTC QLQ-C30 at Weeks 4, 7, 13, 19, 25, 34, 43, 52, 61, 70, End of Treatment, Safety Follow-up Visit, Post-Treatment Follow-up Visit 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6Week 43 Day 1-6.94 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.224
DacarbazineChange From Baseline in Global Health Status Score of EORTC QLQ-C30 at Weeks 4, 7, 13, 19, 25, 34, 43, 52, 61, 70, End of Treatment, Safety Follow-up Visit, Post-Treatment Follow-up Visit 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6Week 13 Day 1-1.34 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.955
DacarbazineChange From Baseline in Global Health Status Score of EORTC QLQ-C30 at Weeks 4, 7, 13, 19, 25, 34, 43, 52, 61, 70, End of Treatment, Safety Follow-up Visit, Post-Treatment Follow-up Visit 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 630-day safety follow-up-9.62 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.372
DacarbazineChange From Baseline in Global Health Status Score of EORTC QLQ-C30 at Weeks 4, 7, 13, 19, 25, 34, 43, 52, 61, 70, End of Treatment, Safety Follow-up Visit, Post-Treatment Follow-up Visit 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6Week 19 Day 1-3.26 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.296
DacarbazineChange From Baseline in Global Health Status Score of EORTC QLQ-C30 at Weeks 4, 7, 13, 19, 25, 34, 43, 52, 61, 70, End of Treatment, Safety Follow-up Visit, Post-Treatment Follow-up Visit 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6Week 52 Day 1-8.33 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.785
DacarbazineChange From Baseline in Global Health Status Score of EORTC QLQ-C30 at Weeks 4, 7, 13, 19, 25, 34, 43, 52, 61, 70, End of Treatment, Safety Follow-up Visit, Post-Treatment Follow-up Visit 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6Week 25 Day 1-3.47 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.036
DacarbazineChange From Baseline in Global Health Status Score of EORTC QLQ-C30 at Weeks 4, 7, 13, 19, 25, 34, 43, 52, 61, 70, End of Treatment, Safety Follow-up Visit, Post-Treatment Follow-up Visit 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6End of Treatment-6.74 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.536
Secondary

Disease Control Rate (DCR)

DCR was calculated as the percentage of participants with a BOR of CR, PR, SD RECIST V1.1, a) CR: disappearance of all lesions; any pathological lymph nodes (TLs) or non-pathological (non-TLs) must have reduction in short axis to \<10 mm; normalization of tumor marker level for non-TLs; b) PR: \>=30% decrease in sum of diameter of all target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters; c) SD: neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR or CR nor an increase in lesions which would qualify for PD taking as reference the smallest sum diameters; d) PD: \>=20% increase in sum of diameter of all measured target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum of diameter of all target lesions recorded at or after baseline, sum must also be absolute increase of \>=5 mm. Unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. Appearance of at least 1 new lesion.

Time frame: From date of randomization until first documented response of CR, PR, SD or non-CR/non-PD (maximum up to 77 weeks for binimetinib arm; maximum up to 61 weeks for dacarbazine arm)

Population: FAS consisted of all randomized participants.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Binimetinib (MEK162)Disease Control Rate (DCR)58.4 Percentage of participants
DacarbazineDisease Control Rate (DCR)24.8 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Duration of Objective Response (DOR)

DOR: time from date of first documented response (CR or PR) to first documented progression or death due to underlying cancer. RECIST V1.1, a) CR: disappearance of all lesions; any pathological lymph nodes (TLs) or non-pathological (non-TLs) must have reduction in short axis to \<10 mm; normalization of tumor marker level for non-TLs; b) PR: \>=30% decrease in sum of diameter (dia) of all TLs, referring baseline sum of dia; c) PD: \>=20% increase in sum of diameter of all measured target lesions taking as reference smallest sum of diameter of all target lesions recorded at or after baseline, sum must also be absolute increase of \>=5 mm. Unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. Appearance of at least 1 new lesion. If a participant with a CR or PR had no PD or death due to underlying cancer, participants was censored at date of last adequate tumor assessment.

Time frame: From the date of first documented response (CR or PR) to the first documented progression or death (maximum up to 77 weeks for binimetinib arm; maximum up to 61 weeks for dacarbazine arm)

Population: Analysis population consisted of all randomized participants and who had confirmed responses (CR or PR).

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Binimetinib (MEK162)Duration of Objective Response (DOR)6.87 Months
DacarbazineDuration of Objective Response (DOR)NA Months
Secondary

Number of Participants With Adverse Events of Special Interest: Cardiac Events

An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship with the study treatment. Grade 1: asymptomatic or mild symptoms, clinical or diagnostic observations only, intervention not indicated; Grade 2: moderate, minimal, local or noninvasive intervention indicated, limiting age-appropriate instrumental activities of daily life (ADL); Grade 3: severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening, hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization indicated, disabling, limiting self-care ADL; Grade 4: life-threatening consequence, urgent intervention indicated; Grade 5: death related to AE. Here, in this outcome measure data is reported for events falling in any of the grades.

Time frame: From baseline up to 77 weeks in binimetinib arm; From baseline up to 61 weeks for dacarbazine arm

Population: The safety set consisted all participants who received at least one dose of the study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline safety evaluation.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Binimetinib (MEK162)Number of Participants With Adverse Events of Special Interest: Cardiac Events35 Participants
DacarbazineNumber of Participants With Adverse Events of Special Interest: Cardiac Events2 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Adverse Events of Special Interest: Ocular Events

An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship with the study treatment. Grade 1: Asymptomatic or mild symptoms; clinical or diagnostic observations only; intervention not indicated; Grade 2: Moderate; minimal, local or noninvasive intervention indicated; limiting age appropriate instrumental ADL; Grade 3: Severe or medically significant but not immediately sight threatening; Hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization indicated; disabling; limiting self-care ADL; Grade 4: Sight-threatening consequences; urgent intervention indicated; blindness (20/200 or worse) in the affected eye. Here, in this outcome measure data is reported for events falling in any of the grades.

Time frame: From baseline up to 77 weeks in binimetinib arm; From baseline up to 61 weeks for dacarbazine arm

Population: The safety set consisted all participants who received at least one dose of the study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline safety evaluation.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Binimetinib (MEK162)Number of Participants With Adverse Events of Special Interest: Ocular Events6 Participants
DacarbazineNumber of Participants With Adverse Events of Special Interest: Ocular Events0 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Clinically Notable Clinical Chemistry/Biochemistry Shifts Based on NCI-CTCAE Grade, Version 4.03

Clinically notable shifts are defined as worsening by at least 2 grades or to \>= grade 3. Severity was graded as Grade 1: asymptomatic or mild symptoms, clinical or diagnostic observations only, intervention not indicated; Grade 2: moderate, minimal, local or noninvasive intervention indicated, limiting age-appropriate instrumental ADL; Grade 3: severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening, hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization indicated, disabling, limiting self-care ADL; Grade 4: life-threatening consequence, urgent intervention indicated; Grade 5: death related to AE.

Time frame: From baseline up to 77 weeks in binimetinib arm; From baseline up to 61 weeks for dacarbazine arm

Population: The safety set consisted all participants who received at least one dose of the study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline safety evaluation.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Binimetinib (MEK162)Number of Participants With Clinically Notable Clinical Chemistry/Biochemistry Shifts Based on NCI-CTCAE Grade, Version 4.03Albumin decreased27 Participants
Binimetinib (MEK162)Number of Participants With Clinically Notable Clinical Chemistry/Biochemistry Shifts Based on NCI-CTCAE Grade, Version 4.03Alkaline phosphatase8 Participants
Binimetinib (MEK162)Number of Participants With Clinically Notable Clinical Chemistry/Biochemistry Shifts Based on NCI-CTCAE Grade, Version 4.03Alanine aminotransferase14 Participants
Binimetinib (MEK162)Number of Participants With Clinically Notable Clinical Chemistry/Biochemistry Shifts Based on NCI-CTCAE Grade, Version 4.03Aspartate aminotransferase20 Participants
Binimetinib (MEK162)Number of Participants With Clinically Notable Clinical Chemistry/Biochemistry Shifts Based on NCI-CTCAE Grade, Version 4.03Bilirubin1 Participants
Binimetinib (MEK162)Number of Participants With Clinically Notable Clinical Chemistry/Biochemistry Shifts Based on NCI-CTCAE Grade, Version 4.03Corrected Calcium increased2 Participants
Binimetinib (MEK162)Number of Participants With Clinically Notable Clinical Chemistry/Biochemistry Shifts Based on NCI-CTCAE Grade, Version 4.03Corrected Calcium decreased2 Participants
Binimetinib (MEK162)Number of Participants With Clinically Notable Clinical Chemistry/Biochemistry Shifts Based on NCI-CTCAE Grade, Version 4.03Creatinine9 Participants
Binimetinib (MEK162)Number of Participants With Clinically Notable Clinical Chemistry/Biochemistry Shifts Based on NCI-CTCAE Grade, Version 4.03Gamma-glutamyl transferase9 Participants
Binimetinib (MEK162)Number of Participants With Clinically Notable Clinical Chemistry/Biochemistry Shifts Based on NCI-CTCAE Grade, Version 4.03Glucose serum fasting increased13 Participants
Binimetinib (MEK162)Number of Participants With Clinically Notable Clinical Chemistry/Biochemistry Shifts Based on NCI-CTCAE Grade, Version 4.03Glucose serum fasting decreased6 Participants
Binimetinib (MEK162)Number of Participants With Clinically Notable Clinical Chemistry/Biochemistry Shifts Based on NCI-CTCAE Grade, Version 4.03Potassium increased13 Participants
Binimetinib (MEK162)Number of Participants With Clinically Notable Clinical Chemistry/Biochemistry Shifts Based on NCI-CTCAE Grade, Version 4.03Potassium decreased14 Participants
Binimetinib (MEK162)Number of Participants With Clinically Notable Clinical Chemistry/Biochemistry Shifts Based on NCI-CTCAE Grade, Version 4.03Magnesium increased1 Participants
Binimetinib (MEK162)Number of Participants With Clinically Notable Clinical Chemistry/Biochemistry Shifts Based on NCI-CTCAE Grade, Version 4.03Magnesium decreased1 Participants
Binimetinib (MEK162)Number of Participants With Clinically Notable Clinical Chemistry/Biochemistry Shifts Based on NCI-CTCAE Grade, Version 4.03Phosphate decreased17 Participants
Binimetinib (MEK162)Number of Participants With Clinically Notable Clinical Chemistry/Biochemistry Shifts Based on NCI-CTCAE Grade, Version 4.03Sodium increased23 Participants
Binimetinib (MEK162)Number of Participants With Clinically Notable Clinical Chemistry/Biochemistry Shifts Based on NCI-CTCAE Grade, Version 4.03Sodium decreased4 Participants
DacarbazineNumber of Participants With Clinically Notable Clinical Chemistry/Biochemistry Shifts Based on NCI-CTCAE Grade, Version 4.03Magnesium increased0 Participants
DacarbazineNumber of Participants With Clinically Notable Clinical Chemistry/Biochemistry Shifts Based on NCI-CTCAE Grade, Version 4.03Albumin decreased5 Participants
DacarbazineNumber of Participants With Clinically Notable Clinical Chemistry/Biochemistry Shifts Based on NCI-CTCAE Grade, Version 4.03Glucose serum fasting increased5 Participants
DacarbazineNumber of Participants With Clinically Notable Clinical Chemistry/Biochemistry Shifts Based on NCI-CTCAE Grade, Version 4.03Alkaline phosphatase2 Participants
DacarbazineNumber of Participants With Clinically Notable Clinical Chemistry/Biochemistry Shifts Based on NCI-CTCAE Grade, Version 4.03Sodium decreased0 Participants
DacarbazineNumber of Participants With Clinically Notable Clinical Chemistry/Biochemistry Shifts Based on NCI-CTCAE Grade, Version 4.03Alanine aminotransferase4 Participants
DacarbazineNumber of Participants With Clinically Notable Clinical Chemistry/Biochemistry Shifts Based on NCI-CTCAE Grade, Version 4.03Glucose serum fasting decreased0 Participants
DacarbazineNumber of Participants With Clinically Notable Clinical Chemistry/Biochemistry Shifts Based on NCI-CTCAE Grade, Version 4.03Aspartate aminotransferase1 Participants
DacarbazineNumber of Participants With Clinically Notable Clinical Chemistry/Biochemistry Shifts Based on NCI-CTCAE Grade, Version 4.03Magnesium decreased0 Participants
DacarbazineNumber of Participants With Clinically Notable Clinical Chemistry/Biochemistry Shifts Based on NCI-CTCAE Grade, Version 4.03Bilirubin1 Participants
DacarbazineNumber of Participants With Clinically Notable Clinical Chemistry/Biochemistry Shifts Based on NCI-CTCAE Grade, Version 4.03Potassium increased3 Participants
DacarbazineNumber of Participants With Clinically Notable Clinical Chemistry/Biochemistry Shifts Based on NCI-CTCAE Grade, Version 4.03Corrected Calcium increased4 Participants
DacarbazineNumber of Participants With Clinically Notable Clinical Chemistry/Biochemistry Shifts Based on NCI-CTCAE Grade, Version 4.03Sodium increased4 Participants
DacarbazineNumber of Participants With Clinically Notable Clinical Chemistry/Biochemistry Shifts Based on NCI-CTCAE Grade, Version 4.03Corrected Calcium decreased0 Participants
DacarbazineNumber of Participants With Clinically Notable Clinical Chemistry/Biochemistry Shifts Based on NCI-CTCAE Grade, Version 4.03Potassium decreased1 Participants
DacarbazineNumber of Participants With Clinically Notable Clinical Chemistry/Biochemistry Shifts Based on NCI-CTCAE Grade, Version 4.03Creatinine2 Participants
DacarbazineNumber of Participants With Clinically Notable Clinical Chemistry/Biochemistry Shifts Based on NCI-CTCAE Grade, Version 4.03Phosphate decreased5 Participants
DacarbazineNumber of Participants With Clinically Notable Clinical Chemistry/Biochemistry Shifts Based on NCI-CTCAE Grade, Version 4.03Gamma-glutamyl transferase7 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Clinically Notable Hematology Shifts Based on National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria (NCI-CTCAE) Grade, Version 4.03

Clinically notable shifts are defined as worsening by at least 2 grades or to \>= grade 3. Severity was graded as Grade 1: asymptomatic or mild symptoms, clinical or diagnostic observations only, intervention not indicated; Grade 2: moderate, minimal, local or noninvasive intervention indicated, limiting age-appropriate instrumental activities of daily life (ADL); Grade 3: severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening, hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization indicated, disabling, limiting self-care ADL; Grade 4: life-threatening consequence, urgent intervention indicated; Grade 5: death related to AE.

Time frame: From baseline up to 77 weeks in binimetinib arm; From baseline up to 61 weeks for dacarbazine arm

Population: The safety set consisted all participants who received at least one dose of the study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline safety evaluation.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Binimetinib (MEK162)Number of Participants With Clinically Notable Hematology Shifts Based on National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria (NCI-CTCAE) Grade, Version 4.03Hemoglobin decreased17 Participants
Binimetinib (MEK162)Number of Participants With Clinically Notable Hematology Shifts Based on National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria (NCI-CTCAE) Grade, Version 4.03Neutrophils decreased8 Participants
Binimetinib (MEK162)Number of Participants With Clinically Notable Hematology Shifts Based on National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria (NCI-CTCAE) Grade, Version 4.03Lymphocytes increased20 Participants
Binimetinib (MEK162)Number of Participants With Clinically Notable Hematology Shifts Based on National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria (NCI-CTCAE) Grade, Version 4.03Platelets decreased3 Participants
Binimetinib (MEK162)Number of Participants With Clinically Notable Hematology Shifts Based on National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria (NCI-CTCAE) Grade, Version 4.03Prothrombin international normalized ratio increased9 Participants
Binimetinib (MEK162)Number of Participants With Clinically Notable Hematology Shifts Based on National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria (NCI-CTCAE) Grade, Version 4.03Leukocytes increased0 Participants
Binimetinib (MEK162)Number of Participants With Clinically Notable Hematology Shifts Based on National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria (NCI-CTCAE) Grade, Version 4.03Lymphocytes decreased35 Participants
Binimetinib (MEK162)Number of Participants With Clinically Notable Hematology Shifts Based on National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria (NCI-CTCAE) Grade, Version 4.03Leukocytes decreased6 Participants
Binimetinib (MEK162)Number of Participants With Clinically Notable Hematology Shifts Based on National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria (NCI-CTCAE) Grade, Version 4.03Activated partial thromboplastin time prolonged7 Participants
DacarbazineNumber of Participants With Clinically Notable Hematology Shifts Based on National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria (NCI-CTCAE) Grade, Version 4.03Leukocytes decreased26 Participants
DacarbazineNumber of Participants With Clinically Notable Hematology Shifts Based on National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria (NCI-CTCAE) Grade, Version 4.03Activated partial thromboplastin time prolonged2 Participants
DacarbazineNumber of Participants With Clinically Notable Hematology Shifts Based on National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria (NCI-CTCAE) Grade, Version 4.03Hemoglobin decreased13 Participants
DacarbazineNumber of Participants With Clinically Notable Hematology Shifts Based on National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria (NCI-CTCAE) Grade, Version 4.03Prothrombin international normalized ratio increased0 Participants
DacarbazineNumber of Participants With Clinically Notable Hematology Shifts Based on National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria (NCI-CTCAE) Grade, Version 4.03Lymphocytes increased0 Participants
DacarbazineNumber of Participants With Clinically Notable Hematology Shifts Based on National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria (NCI-CTCAE) Grade, Version 4.03Lymphocytes decreased19 Participants
DacarbazineNumber of Participants With Clinically Notable Hematology Shifts Based on National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria (NCI-CTCAE) Grade, Version 4.03Neutrophils decreased21 Participants
DacarbazineNumber of Participants With Clinically Notable Hematology Shifts Based on National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria (NCI-CTCAE) Grade, Version 4.03Platelets decreased17 Participants
DacarbazineNumber of Participants With Clinically Notable Hematology Shifts Based on National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria (NCI-CTCAE) Grade, Version 4.03Leukocytes increased0 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Clinically Notable Vital Signs

Abnormalities criteria included: low/high pulse rate (beats per minute \[bpm\]):\<=50bpm with decrease from baseline \>=15bpm/\>=120bpm with increase from baseline \>=15bpm; Low/high systolic blood pressure (millimeters of mercury \[mmHg\]): \<=90mmHg with decrease from baseline \>=20mmHg/\>=160mmHg with increase from baseline \>=20mmHg; Low/high diastolic blood pressure \[mmHg\]: \<=50mmHg with decrease from baseline \>=15mmHg/\>=100mmHg with increase from baseline \>=15mmHg; Low/high body weight (kilogram \[kg\]): \>=20% decrease from baseline / \>=10% increase from baseline; Low/high body temperature (degree Celsius \[°C\]): \<=36°C / \>= 37.5°C

Time frame: From baseline up to 77 weeks in binimetinib arm; From baseline up to 61 weeks for dacarbazine arm

Population: The safety set consisted all participants who received at least one dose of the study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline safety evaluation. Here, number analyzed signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure for specified rows.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Binimetinib (MEK162)Number of Participants With Clinically Notable Vital SignsSitting systolic blood pressure - High43 Participants
Binimetinib (MEK162)Number of Participants With Clinically Notable Vital SignsSitting diastolic blood pressure - Low2 Participants
Binimetinib (MEK162)Number of Participants With Clinically Notable Vital SignsSitting Pulse Rate - Low3 Participants
Binimetinib (MEK162)Number of Participants With Clinically Notable Vital SignsWeight - High16 Participants
Binimetinib (MEK162)Number of Participants With Clinically Notable Vital SignsSitting systolic blood pressure -Low2 Participants
Binimetinib (MEK162)Number of Participants With Clinically Notable Vital SignsWeight - Low0 Participants
Binimetinib (MEK162)Number of Participants With Clinically Notable Vital SignsBody temperature - High15 Participants
Binimetinib (MEK162)Number of Participants With Clinically Notable Vital SignsSitting Pulse Rate - High4 Participants
Binimetinib (MEK162)Number of Participants With Clinically Notable Vital SignsBody temperature - Low90 Participants
Binimetinib (MEK162)Number of Participants With Clinically Notable Vital SignsSitting diastolic blood pressure - High28 Participants
DacarbazineNumber of Participants With Clinically Notable Vital SignsBody temperature - Low24 Participants
DacarbazineNumber of Participants With Clinically Notable Vital SignsSitting Pulse Rate - High1 Participants
DacarbazineNumber of Participants With Clinically Notable Vital SignsSitting Pulse Rate - Low1 Participants
DacarbazineNumber of Participants With Clinically Notable Vital SignsSitting systolic blood pressure - High8 Participants
DacarbazineNumber of Participants With Clinically Notable Vital SignsSitting systolic blood pressure -Low4 Participants
DacarbazineNumber of Participants With Clinically Notable Vital SignsSitting diastolic blood pressure - High4 Participants
DacarbazineNumber of Participants With Clinically Notable Vital SignsSitting diastolic blood pressure - Low1 Participants
DacarbazineNumber of Participants With Clinically Notable Vital SignsWeight - High1 Participants
DacarbazineNumber of Participants With Clinically Notable Vital SignsBody temperature - High6 Participants
DacarbazineNumber of Participants With Clinically Notable Vital SignsWeight - Low0 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Findings in Physical Examination

A complete physical examination included the examination of general appearance, skin, neck (including thyroid), eyes, ears, nose, throat, lungs, heart, abdomen, back, lymph nodes, extremities, vascular and neurological systems. If indicated based on medical history and/or symptoms, rectal, external genitalia, breast, and pelvic examinations were performed. Clinical significance in physical examination was reported as adverse events.

Time frame: From baseline up to 77 weeks in binimetinib arm; From baseline up to 61 weeks for dacarbazine arm

Population: No data was collected and analyzed for this outcome measure, any clinically significant physical examination findings were counted as adverse events and reported in safety section.

Secondary

Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS)

ECOG PS was used to assess the physical health of participants, and ranged from 0 (most active) to 5 (dead). ECOG PS grades: 0= fully active, able to carry on all pre-disease performance without restriction, 1= restricted in physically strenuous activity but ambulatory and able to carry out work of a light or sedentary nature, e.g., light house work, office work, 2= ambulatory and capable of all self-care but unable to carry out any work activities. Up and about more than 50% of waking hours, 3= capable of only limited self-care, 4=completely disabled. cannot carry on any selfcare. Totally confined to bed or chair confined to bed or chair more than 50% of waking hours and 5= dead. Post-treatment tumor assessments follow up visits occurred at every 9 weeks if participants started new anticancer therapy.

Time frame: For both arms: Baseline, Weeks 4, 7, 10, 13, 16, 19, 22, 25, 28, 31, 34, 37, 40, 43, 46, 49, 52, 55 and 30-day Follow-up For binimetinib only: Weeks 58, 61, 64, 67, 70, 73

Population: The safety set consisted all participants who received at least one dose of the study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline safety evaluation. Here, Number Analyzed signifies number of participants evaluable for specified rows.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Binimetinib (MEK162)Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS)Week 37 Day 1: Grade 016 Participants
Binimetinib (MEK162)Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS)Baseline : Grade 0193 Participants
Binimetinib (MEK162)Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS)Week 4 Day 1: Grade 33 Participants
Binimetinib (MEK162)Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS)Week 7 Day 1: Grade 0138 Participants
Binimetinib (MEK162)Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS)Week 7 Day 1: Grade 184 Participants
Binimetinib (MEK162)Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS)Week 7 Day 1: Grade 210 Participants
Binimetinib (MEK162)Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS)Week 7 Day 1: Grade 33 Participants
Binimetinib (MEK162)Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS)Week 7 Day 1: Grade 41 Participants
Binimetinib (MEK162)Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS)Week 10 Day 1: Grade 0118 Participants
Binimetinib (MEK162)Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS)Week 10 Day 1: Grade 172 Participants
Binimetinib (MEK162)Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS)Week 10 Day 1: Grade 28 Participants
Binimetinib (MEK162)Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS)Week 10 Day 1: Grade 33 Participants
Binimetinib (MEK162)Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS)Week 13 Day 1: Grade 093 Participants
Binimetinib (MEK162)Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS)Week 13 Day 1: Grade 162 Participants
Binimetinib (MEK162)Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS)Week 13 Day 1: Grade 211 Participants
Binimetinib (MEK162)Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS)Week 13 Day 1: Grade 31 Participants
Binimetinib (MEK162)Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS)Week 16 Day 1: Grade 070 Participants
Binimetinib (MEK162)Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS)Week 16 Day 1: Grade 148 Participants
Binimetinib (MEK162)Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS)Week 16 Day 1: Grade 25 Participants
Binimetinib (MEK162)Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS)Week 16 Day 1: Grade 41 Participants
Binimetinib (MEK162)Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS)Week 19 Day 1: Grade 053 Participants
Binimetinib (MEK162)Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS)Week 19 Day 1: Grade 143 Participants
Binimetinib (MEK162)Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS)Week 19 Day 1:Grade 24 Participants
Binimetinib (MEK162)Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS)Week 22 Day 1: Grade 042 Participants
Binimetinib (MEK162)Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS)Week 22 Day 1: Grade 126 Participants
Binimetinib (MEK162)Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS)Week 22 Day 1: Grade 23 Participants
Binimetinib (MEK162)Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS)Week 22 Day 1: Grade 31 Participants
Binimetinib (MEK162)Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS)Week 25 Day 1: Grade 037 Participants
Binimetinib (MEK162)Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS)Week 25 Day 1: Grade 119 Participants
Binimetinib (MEK162)Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS)Week 25 Day 1: Grade 21 Participants
Binimetinib (MEK162)Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS)Week 25 Day 1: Grade 31 Participants
Binimetinib (MEK162)Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS)Week 28 Day 1: Grade 028 Participants
Binimetinib (MEK162)Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS)Week 28 Day 1: Grade 115 Participants
Binimetinib (MEK162)Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS)Week 28 Day 1: Grade 22 Participants
Binimetinib (MEK162)Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS)Week 28 Day 1: Grade 51 Participants
Binimetinib (MEK162)Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS)Week 31 Day 1: Grade 022 Participants
Binimetinib (MEK162)Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS)Week 31 Day 1: Grade 111 Participants
Binimetinib (MEK162)Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS)Week 31 Day 1: Grade 21 Participants
Binimetinib (MEK162)Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS)Week 34 Day 1: Grade 020 Participants
Binimetinib (MEK162)Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS)Week 34 Day 1: Grade 17 Participants
Binimetinib (MEK162)Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS)Week 34 Day 1: Grade 22 Participants
Binimetinib (MEK162)Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS)Week 49 Day 1: Grade 09 Participants
Binimetinib (MEK162)Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS)Week 49 Day 1: Grade 12 Participants
Binimetinib (MEK162)Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS)Week 52 Day 1: Grade 010 Participants
Binimetinib (MEK162)Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS)Week 52 Day 1: Grade 11 Participants
Binimetinib (MEK162)Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS)Week 55 Day 1: Grade 09 Participants
Binimetinib (MEK162)Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS)Week 55 Day 1: Grade 11 Participants
Binimetinib (MEK162)Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS)Week 58 Day 1: Grade 07 Participants
Binimetinib (MEK162)Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS)Week 58 Day 1: Grade 11 Participants
Binimetinib (MEK162)Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS)Week 61 Day 1: Grade 05 Participants
Binimetinib (MEK162)Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS)Week 64 Day 1: Grade 04 Participants
Binimetinib (MEK162)Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS)Week 67 Day 1: Grade 03 Participants
Binimetinib (MEK162)Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS)Week 70 Day 1: Grade 02 Participants
Binimetinib (MEK162)Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS)Week 73 Day 1: Grade 01 Participants
Binimetinib (MEK162)Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS)Safety Follow up Visit: Grade 042 Participants
Binimetinib (MEK162)Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS)Safety Follow up Visit: Grade 141 Participants
Binimetinib (MEK162)Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS)Safety Follow up Visit: Grade 214 Participants
Binimetinib (MEK162)Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS)Safety Follow up Visit: Grade 34 Participants
Binimetinib (MEK162)Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS)Safety Follow up Visit: Grade 44 Participants
Binimetinib (MEK162)Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS)Week 37 Day 1: Grade 14 Participants
Binimetinib (MEK162)Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS)Week 40 Day 1: Grade 015 Participants
Binimetinib (MEK162)Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS)Week 40 Day 1: Grade 10 Participants
Binimetinib (MEK162)Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS)Week 43 Day 1: Grade 012 Participants
Binimetinib (MEK162)Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS)Week 43 Day 1: Grade 11 Participants
Binimetinib (MEK162)Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS)Week 43 Day 1: Grade 21 Participants
Binimetinib (MEK162)Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS)Week 46 Day 1: Grade 011 Participants
Binimetinib (MEK162)Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS)Week 46 Day 1: Grade 12 Participants
Binimetinib (MEK162)Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS)Week 46 Day 1: Grade 21 Participants
Binimetinib (MEK162)Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS)Baseline: Grade 176 Participants
Binimetinib (MEK162)Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS)Baseline : Grade 20 Participants
Binimetinib (MEK162)Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS)Week 4 Day 1: Grade 0146 Participants
Binimetinib (MEK162)Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS)Week 4 Day 1: Grade 1101 Participants
Binimetinib (MEK162)Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS)Week 4 Day 1: Grade 26 Participants
DacarbazineNumber of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS)Baseline : Grade 082 Participants
DacarbazineNumber of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS)Week 25 Day 1: Grade 20 Participants
DacarbazineNumber of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS)Baseline: Grade 131 Participants
DacarbazineNumber of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS)Safety Follow up Visit: Grade 30 Participants
DacarbazineNumber of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS)Baseline : Grade 21 Participants
DacarbazineNumber of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS)Week 25 Day 1: Grade 30 Participants
DacarbazineNumber of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS)Week 4 Day 1: Grade 066 Participants
DacarbazineNumber of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS)Week 55 Day 1: Grade 11 Participants
DacarbazineNumber of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS)Week 4 Day 1: Grade 127 Participants
DacarbazineNumber of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS)Week 28 Day 1: Grade 09 Participants
DacarbazineNumber of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS)Week 4 Day 1: Grade 24 Participants
DacarbazineNumber of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS)Week 46 Day 1: Grade 04 Participants
DacarbazineNumber of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS)Week 4 Day 1: Grade 30 Participants
DacarbazineNumber of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS)Week 28 Day 1: Grade 12 Participants
DacarbazineNumber of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS)Week 7 Day 1: Grade 051 Participants
DacarbazineNumber of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS)Safety Follow up Visit: Grade 40 Participants
DacarbazineNumber of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS)Week 7 Day 1: Grade 126 Participants
DacarbazineNumber of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS)Week 28 Day 1: Grade 20 Participants
DacarbazineNumber of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS)Week 7 Day 1: Grade 23 Participants
DacarbazineNumber of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS)Week 37 Day 1: Grade 07 Participants
DacarbazineNumber of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS)Week 7 Day 1: Grade 30 Participants
DacarbazineNumber of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS)Week 28 Day 1: Grade 50 Participants
DacarbazineNumber of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS)Week 7 Day 1: Grade 40 Participants
DacarbazineNumber of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS)Week 43 Day 1: Grade 10 Participants
DacarbazineNumber of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS)Week 10 Day 1: Grade 034 Participants
DacarbazineNumber of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS)Week 31 Day 1: Grade 07 Participants
DacarbazineNumber of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS)Week 10 Day 1: Grade 115 Participants
DacarbazineNumber of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS)Week 37 Day 1: Grade 11 Participants
DacarbazineNumber of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS)Week 10 Day 1: Grade 22 Participants
DacarbazineNumber of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS)Week 31 Day 1: Grade 12 Participants
DacarbazineNumber of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS)Week 10 Day 1: Grade 30 Participants
DacarbazineNumber of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS)Week 46 Day 1: Grade 20 Participants
DacarbazineNumber of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS)Week 13 Day 1: Grade 029 Participants
DacarbazineNumber of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS)Week 31 Day 1: Grade 20 Participants
DacarbazineNumber of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS)Week 13 Day 1: Grade 114 Participants
DacarbazineNumber of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS)Week 40 Day 1: Grade 06 Participants
DacarbazineNumber of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS)Week 13 Day 1: Grade 20 Participants
DacarbazineNumber of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS)Week 34 Day 1: Grade 09 Participants
DacarbazineNumber of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS)Week 13 Day 1: Grade 30 Participants
DacarbazineNumber of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS)Week 43 Day 1: Grade 20 Participants
DacarbazineNumber of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS)Week 16 Day 1: Grade 024 Participants
DacarbazineNumber of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS)Week 34 Day 1: Grade 11 Participants
DacarbazineNumber of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS)Week 16 Day 1: Grade 15 Participants
DacarbazineNumber of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS)Safety Follow up Visit: Grade 024 Participants
DacarbazineNumber of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS)Week 16 Day 1: Grade 21 Participants
DacarbazineNumber of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS)Week 34 Day 1: Grade 20 Participants
DacarbazineNumber of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS)Week 16 Day 1: Grade 40 Participants
DacarbazineNumber of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS)Week 40 Day 1: Grade 11 Participants
DacarbazineNumber of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS)Week 19 Day 1: Grade 019 Participants
DacarbazineNumber of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS)Week 49 Day 1: Grade 01 Participants
DacarbazineNumber of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS)Week 19 Day 1: Grade 17 Participants
DacarbazineNumber of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS)Safety Follow up Visit: Grade 116 Participants
DacarbazineNumber of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS)Week 19 Day 1:Grade 22 Participants
DacarbazineNumber of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS)Week 49 Day 1: Grade 10 Participants
DacarbazineNumber of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS)Week 22 Day 1: Grade 017 Participants
DacarbazineNumber of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS)Week 46 Day 1: Grade 10 Participants
DacarbazineNumber of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS)Week 22 Day 1: Grade 15 Participants
DacarbazineNumber of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS)Week 52 Day 1: Grade 02 Participants
DacarbazineNumber of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS)Week 22 Day 1: Grade 20 Participants
DacarbazineNumber of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS)Safety Follow up Visit: Grade 24 Participants
DacarbazineNumber of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS)Week 22 Day 1: Grade 30 Participants
DacarbazineNumber of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS)Week 52 Day 1: Grade 11 Participants
DacarbazineNumber of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS)Week 25 Day 1: Grade 013 Participants
DacarbazineNumber of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS)Week 43 Day 1: Grade 05 Participants
DacarbazineNumber of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS)Week 25 Day 1: Grade 16 Participants
DacarbazineNumber of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS)Week 55 Day 1: Grade 01 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Neuroblastoma RAS Viral (V-ras) Oncogene Homolog (NRAS) Mutation Status at Baseline

Number of participants with NRAS mutation status at baseline were reported.

Time frame: Baseline

Population: FAS consisted of all randomized participants. Here, number analyzed signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure for specified rows.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Binimetinib (MEK162)Number of Participants With Neuroblastoma RAS Viral (V-ras) Oncogene Homolog (NRAS) Mutation Status at BaselineWild Type0 Participants
Binimetinib (MEK162)Number of Participants With Neuroblastoma RAS Viral (V-ras) Oncogene Homolog (NRAS) Mutation Status at BaselineMutant: Q61K100 Participants
Binimetinib (MEK162)Number of Participants With Neuroblastoma RAS Viral (V-ras) Oncogene Homolog (NRAS) Mutation Status at BaselineMutant: Q61L32 Participants
Binimetinib (MEK162)Number of Participants With Neuroblastoma RAS Viral (V-ras) Oncogene Homolog (NRAS) Mutation Status at BaselineMutant: Q61R137 Participants
DacarbazineNumber of Participants With Neuroblastoma RAS Viral (V-ras) Oncogene Homolog (NRAS) Mutation Status at BaselineMutant: Q61R64 Participants
DacarbazineNumber of Participants With Neuroblastoma RAS Viral (V-ras) Oncogene Homolog (NRAS) Mutation Status at BaselineWild Type1 Participants
DacarbazineNumber of Participants With Neuroblastoma RAS Viral (V-ras) Oncogene Homolog (NRAS) Mutation Status at BaselineMutant: Q61L17 Participants
DacarbazineNumber of Participants With Neuroblastoma RAS Viral (V-ras) Oncogene Homolog (NRAS) Mutation Status at BaselineMutant: Q61K51 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Notable Electrocardiogram (ECG) Values

Criteria for notable ECG values were as follow: QT interval (in millisecond \[msec\]) new (newly occurring post-baseline value) greater than (\>) 450, 480, 500, increase from baseline \>30, increase from baseline \>60; corrected QT interval by Fredericia formula (QTcF) in msec new (newly occurring post-baseline value) \> 450, 480, 500, increase from baseline \>30, increase from baseline \>60; corrected QT interval by Bazett's formula (QTcB) in msec new (newly occurring post-baseline value) \> 450, 480, 500, increase from baseline \>30, increase from baseline \>60; heart rate in bpm new (newly occurring post-baseline value) \<60 and \>100.

Time frame: From baseline up to 77 weeks in binimetinib arm; From baseline up to 61 weeks for dacarbazine arm

Population: The safety set consisted all participants who received at least one dose of the study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline safety evaluation. Here, number analyzed signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure for specified rows.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Binimetinib (MEK162)Number of Participants With Notable Electrocardiogram (ECG) ValuesQT - New > 480 msec7 Participants
Binimetinib (MEK162)Number of Participants With Notable Electrocardiogram (ECG) ValuesQTcF - Increase from baseline > 60 msec9 Participants
Binimetinib (MEK162)Number of Participants With Notable Electrocardiogram (ECG) ValuesQTcF - New > 450 msec29 Participants
Binimetinib (MEK162)Number of Participants With Notable Electrocardiogram (ECG) ValuesQTcB - New > 450 msec65 Participants
Binimetinib (MEK162)Number of Participants With Notable Electrocardiogram (ECG) ValuesQT - Increase from baseline > 30 msec109 Participants
Binimetinib (MEK162)Number of Participants With Notable Electrocardiogram (ECG) ValuesQTcB - New > 480 msec24 Participants
Binimetinib (MEK162)Number of Participants With Notable Electrocardiogram (ECG) ValuesQTcF - New > 480 msec10 Participants
Binimetinib (MEK162)Number of Participants With Notable Electrocardiogram (ECG) ValuesQTcB - New > 500 msec6 Participants
Binimetinib (MEK162)Number of Participants With Notable Electrocardiogram (ECG) ValuesQT - New > 500 msec5 Participants
Binimetinib (MEK162)Number of Participants With Notable Electrocardiogram (ECG) ValuesQTcB - Increase from baseline > 30 msec76 Participants
Binimetinib (MEK162)Number of Participants With Notable Electrocardiogram (ECG) ValuesQTcF - New > 500 msec5 Participants
Binimetinib (MEK162)Number of Participants With Notable Electrocardiogram (ECG) ValuesQTcB - Increase from baseline > 60 msec11 Participants
Binimetinib (MEK162)Number of Participants With Notable Electrocardiogram (ECG) ValuesQT - Increase from baseline > 60 msec28 Participants
Binimetinib (MEK162)Number of Participants With Notable Electrocardiogram (ECG) ValuesHeart rate - New < 60 bpm85 Participants
Binimetinib (MEK162)Number of Participants With Notable Electrocardiogram (ECG) ValuesQTcF - Increase from baseline > 30 msec52 Participants
Binimetinib (MEK162)Number of Participants With Notable Electrocardiogram (ECG) ValuesHeart rate - New > 100 bpm18 Participants
Binimetinib (MEK162)Number of Participants With Notable Electrocardiogram (ECG) ValuesQT - New > 450 msec32 Participants
DacarbazineNumber of Participants With Notable Electrocardiogram (ECG) ValuesHeart rate - New > 100 bpm16 Participants
DacarbazineNumber of Participants With Notable Electrocardiogram (ECG) ValuesQT - New > 450 msec8 Participants
DacarbazineNumber of Participants With Notable Electrocardiogram (ECG) ValuesQT - New > 480 msec1 Participants
DacarbazineNumber of Participants With Notable Electrocardiogram (ECG) ValuesQT - New > 500 msec0 Participants
DacarbazineNumber of Participants With Notable Electrocardiogram (ECG) ValuesQT - Increase from baseline > 30 msec33 Participants
DacarbazineNumber of Participants With Notable Electrocardiogram (ECG) ValuesQT - Increase from baseline > 60 msec5 Participants
DacarbazineNumber of Participants With Notable Electrocardiogram (ECG) ValuesQTcF - New > 450 msec15 Participants
DacarbazineNumber of Participants With Notable Electrocardiogram (ECG) ValuesQTcF - New > 480 msec1 Participants
DacarbazineNumber of Participants With Notable Electrocardiogram (ECG) ValuesQTcF - New > 500 msec1 Participants
DacarbazineNumber of Participants With Notable Electrocardiogram (ECG) ValuesQTcF - Increase from baseline > 30 msec25 Participants
DacarbazineNumber of Participants With Notable Electrocardiogram (ECG) ValuesQTcF - Increase from baseline > 60 msec5 Participants
DacarbazineNumber of Participants With Notable Electrocardiogram (ECG) ValuesQTcB - New > 450 msec26 Participants
DacarbazineNumber of Participants With Notable Electrocardiogram (ECG) ValuesQTcB - New > 480 msec8 Participants
DacarbazineNumber of Participants With Notable Electrocardiogram (ECG) ValuesQTcB - New > 500 msec6 Participants
DacarbazineNumber of Participants With Notable Electrocardiogram (ECG) ValuesQTcB - Increase from baseline > 30 msec36 Participants
DacarbazineNumber of Participants With Notable Electrocardiogram (ECG) ValuesQTcB - Increase from baseline > 60 msec9 Participants
DacarbazineNumber of Participants With Notable Electrocardiogram (ECG) ValuesHeart rate - New < 60 bpm13 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)

An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship with the study treatment. SAE was defined as one of the following: was fatal or life-threatening; resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity; constituted a congenital anomaly/birth defect; was medically significant; required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization. Treatment-emergent AE was defined as an AE with onset date occurring during the on-treatment period. AEs included all SAEs and non-SAEs.

Time frame: From baseline up to 219.4 weeks for binimetinib arm; From baseline up to 123.9 weeks for dacarbazine arm

Population: The safety set consisted all participants who received at least one dose of the study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline safety evaluation.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Binimetinib (MEK162)Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)AEs269 Participants
Binimetinib (MEK162)Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)SAEs95 Participants
DacarbazineNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)AEs104 Participants
DacarbazineNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)SAEs26 Participants
Secondary

Overall Response Rate (ORR)

ORR: percentage of participants with best overall response (BOR) of CR or PR. BOR: best response recorded from start of treatment until CR or PR. RECIST V1.1, a) CR: disappearance of all lesions; any pathological lymph nodes (TLs) or non-pathological (non-TLs) must have reduction in short axis to \<10 mm; normalization of tumor marker level for non-TLs; b) PR: \>=30% decrease in sum of diameter of all TLs, taking as reference baseline sum of diameters. ORR is reported for confirmed and unconfirmed responses. Confirmed CR or PR = at least 2 determinations of CR or PR at least 4 weeks apart before PD. PD: \>=20% increase in sum of diameter of all measured target lesions, taking as reference smallest sum of diameter of all TLs recorded at or after baseline, sum must also be absolute increase of \>=5 mm. Unequivocal progression of existing non TLs. Appearance of at least 1 new lesion.

Time frame: From date of randomization until first documented response of CR or PR (maximum up to 77 weeks for binimetinib arm; maximum up to 61 weeks for dacarbazine arm)

Population: FAS consisted of all randomized participants.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Binimetinib (MEK162)Overall Response Rate (ORR)Confirmed ORR15.2 Percentage of Participants
Binimetinib (MEK162)Overall Response Rate (ORR)Confirmed + Unconfirmed: ORR22.7 Percentage of Participants
DacarbazineOverall Response Rate (ORR)Confirmed ORR6.8 Percentage of Participants
DacarbazineOverall Response Rate (ORR)Confirmed + Unconfirmed: ORR9.8 Percentage of Participants
Comparison: Confirmed ORR: The p-value (2-sided) was computed from stratified Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel chi-square test statistic.p-value: 0.015Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Comparison: Confirmed ORR + Unconfirmed ORR: The p-value (2-sided) was computed from stratified Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel chi-square test statistic.p-value: 0.002Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

Overall Survival (OS)

Overall survival was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of death due to any cause. If a participant was not known to have died, overall survival was censored at the date of last known date participant alive.

Time frame: From the date of randomization to the date of death (maximum up to 107 weeks for binimetinib arm; maximum up to 88 weeks for dacarbazine arm)

Population: FAS consisted of all randomized participants.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Binimetinib (MEK162)Overall Survival (OS)10.97 Months
DacarbazineOverall Survival (OS)10.09 Months
Comparison: Hazard ratio was obtained from the stratified unadjusted Cox model. P-value was obtained from the one-sided stratified log rank test.p-value: 0.49995% CI: [0.75, 1.33]Log Rank
Secondary

Plasma Concentration of Binimetinib

Time frame: Day 1 of Week 1: Pre-dose, 1, 1.5, 2, 10 hours post-dose; Day 1 of Weeks 4, 7: Pre-dose, 1.5 hours post-dose; Day 1 of Weeks 10, 13: Pre-dose

Population: The pharmacokinetic analysis set (PAS) consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of binimetinib and had at least one evaluable post-baseline binimetinib concentration measurement. Here, Overall Number of Participants Analyzed = number of participants evaluable for this outcome measure. This outcome was planned to be evaluated only for binimetinib arm. Here, number analyzed signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure for specified timeframes.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
Binimetinib (MEK162)Plasma Concentration of BinimetinibWeek 1 Day 1, Pre-dose64.4 Nanogram per milliliterGeometric Coefficient of Variation 1132.3
Binimetinib (MEK162)Plasma Concentration of BinimetinibWeek 1 Day 1, 1 hour (hr) Post-dose182 Nanogram per milliliterGeometric Coefficient of Variation 237.6
Binimetinib (MEK162)Plasma Concentration of BinimetinibWeek 1 Day 1, 1.5 hr Post-dose313 Nanogram per milliliterGeometric Coefficient of Variation 71.6
Binimetinib (MEK162)Plasma Concentration of BinimetinibWeek 1 Day 1, 2 hr Post-dose321 Nanogram per milliliterGeometric Coefficient of Variation 64.4
Binimetinib (MEK162)Plasma Concentration of BinimetinibWeek 1 Day 1, 10 hr Post-dose153 Nanogram per milliliterGeometric Coefficient of Variation 52.6
Binimetinib (MEK162)Plasma Concentration of BinimetinibWeek 4 Day 1, Pre-dose101 Nanogram per milliliterGeometric Coefficient of Variation 100.8
Binimetinib (MEK162)Plasma Concentration of BinimetinibWeek 4 Day 1, 1.5 hr Post-dose418 Nanogram per milliliterGeometric Coefficient of Variation 51.9
Binimetinib (MEK162)Plasma Concentration of BinimetinibWeek 7 Day 1, Pre-dose101 Nanogram per milliliterGeometric Coefficient of Variation 97.7
Binimetinib (MEK162)Plasma Concentration of BinimetinibWeek 7 Day 1, 1.5 hr Post-dose372 Nanogram per milliliterGeometric Coefficient of Variation 63.4
Binimetinib (MEK162)Plasma Concentration of BinimetinibWeek 10 Day 1, Pre-dose92.9 Nanogram per milliliterGeometric Coefficient of Variation 60.6
Binimetinib (MEK162)Plasma Concentration of BinimetinibWeek 13 Day 1, Pre-dose93.9 Nanogram per milliliterGeometric Coefficient of Variation 89.8
Secondary

Time to Definitive 10% Deterioration in Global Health Status Score of European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (QLQ-C30)

The time to definitive 10% deterioration was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of event, which was defined as death due to any cause or at least 10% worsening of the corresponding scale score, relative to baseline, with no later improvement above this threshold observed during the course of the study or death due to any cause. If a participant had no event prior to analysis cut-off or start of another anticancer therapy, time to deterioration was censored at the date of the last adequate health related quality of life (HRQoL) evaluation. EORTC QLQ-C30: 5 functional scales (physical, role, cognitive, emotional, and social), a global health status scale, 3 symptom scales (nausea/vomiting, pain, fatigue) and 6 single items (dyspnea, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea and financial difficulties). All scales and single-item measures range =0 to 100. High score for global health status = high quality of life.

Time frame: From baseline up to 77 weeks in binimetinib arm; From baseline up to 61 weeks for dacarbazine arm

Population: FAS consisted of all randomized participants.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Binimetinib (MEK162)Time to Definitive 10% Deterioration in Global Health Status Score of European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (QLQ-C30)2.79 Months
DacarbazineTime to Definitive 10% Deterioration in Global Health Status Score of European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (QLQ-C30)4.27 Months
95% CI: [0.96, 2.13]Log Rank
Secondary

Time to Definitive 1 Point Deterioration in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS)

ECOG PS was used to assess the physical health of participants, and ranged from 0 (most active) to 5 (dead). ECOG PS grades: 0= fully active, able to carry on all pre-disease performance without restriction, 1= restricted in physically strenuous activity but ambulatory and able to carry out work of a light or sedentary nature, e.g., light house work, office work, 2= ambulatory and capable of all self-care but unable to carry out any work activities. Up and about more than 50% of waking hours, 3= capable of only limited self-care, confined to bed or chair more than 50% of waking hours, 4=completely disabled. cannot carry on any selfcare. Totally confined to bed or chair and 5= dead. Definitive deterioration is defined as on treatment death due to any cause or decrease in ECOG PS by at least one category from baseline score.

Time frame: From baseline up to 73 weeks 3 days for binimetinib arm; From baseline up to 57 weeks 3 days for dacarbazine arm

Population: The safety set consisted all participants who received at least one dose of the study drug and had at least one valid post-baseline safety evaluation. Here, Overall Number of Participants Analyzed = number of participants evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Binimetinib (MEK162)Time to Definitive 1 Point Deterioration in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS)NA Months
DacarbazineTime to Definitive 1 Point Deterioration in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS)NA Months
Comparison: Log-rank test and Cox PH model were stratified by American joint committee on cancer stage, prior line immunotherapy and ECOG performance status. P-value was one tailed and was based on the log-rank score test. Hazard ratio and 95% CI was based on a Wald test from Cox model.p-value: 0.99595% CI: [1.19, 4.06]Log Rank
Secondary

Time to Response (TTR)

TTR: time between date of randomization until first documented response of CR or PR. RECIST V1.1, a) CR: disappearance of all lesions; any pathological lymph nodes (TLs) or non-pathological (non-TLs) must have reduction in short axis to \<10 mm; normalization of tumor marker level for non-TLs; b) PR: \>=30% decrease in sum of diameter (dia) of all TLs, referring baseline sum of dia; c) PD: \>=20% increase in sum of diameter of all measured TLs taking as reference smallest sum of diameter of all TLs recorded at or after baseline, sum must also be absolute increase of \>=5 mm. Unequivocal progression of existing non-TLs. Appearance of \>=1 new lesion. Participants who did not achieve PR or CR censored at last adequate tumor assessment date when they did not have PFS event (time from date of randomization to date of first documented PD or death due to any cause, whichever occur first) or at maximum follow-up when they had PFS event.

Time frame: From date of randomization until first documented response of CR or PR (maximum up to 77 weeks for binimetinib arm; maximum up to 61 weeks for dacarbazine arm)

Population: Analysis population consisted of all randomized participants and who had at least once CR or PR.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Binimetinib (MEK162)Time to Response (TTR)1.45 Months
DacarbazineTime to Response (TTR)2.79 Months

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 10, 2026