Presbyopia
Conditions
Brief summary
The objective of this study is to evaluate the performance of a novel multifocal lens system.
Interventions
To be worn in a daily wear modality for a minimum of 6 hours per day.
Lenses will be worn in a reuseable modality; cleaned and disinfected each night.
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
1. Subjects must read, understand, and sign the STATEMENT OF INFORMED CONSENT and receive a fully executed copy of the form. 2. Subjects must appear able and willing to adhere to the instructions set forth in the clinical protocol. 3. Subjects must be between 40 and 70 years of age. 4. Subjects' spherical equivalent distance refraction must be in the range of -3.75 to +3.75 in each eye. 5. Subjects' refractive cylinder must be less than or equal to 0.75D in each eye. 6. Subjects' ADD power must be in the range of +0.75 to +2.50D in each eye. 7. Subjects' must have the best corrected visual acuity of 20/20-3 or better in each eye. 8. Subjects' should own a wearable pair of spectacles. 9. Subjects' must be an adapted soft contact lens wearer in both eyes (i.e. worn lenses a minimum of 2 days per week for at least 8 hours per wear day, for 1 month or more duration). 10. Subjects' must respond positively to at least on symptom on the Presbyopis Symptoms Questionnaire or already be wearing a presbyopic contact lens correction (e.g. reading spectacles over contact lenses, multifocal or monovision contact lenses, etc.).
Exclusion criteria
1. Currently pregnant or lactating (subjects who become pregnant during the study will be discontinued). 2. Any ocular or systemic allergies or diseases that may interfere with contact lens wear. 3. Any systemic disease, autoimmune disease, or use of medication, which may interfere with contact lens wear. 4. Any previous intraocular surgery (e.g. radial keratotomy, PRK, LASIK, etc.) 5. Any grade 3 or greater slit lamp findings (e.g. edema, corneal neovascularization, corneal staining, tarsal abnormalities, conjunctival injection) which may contraindicate contact lens wear. 6. Any ocular infection. 7. Any corneal distortion resulting from previous hard or rigid gas permeable contact lens wear. 8. History of binocular vision abnormality or strabismus. 9. Any infectious disease (e.g. hepatitis, tuberculosis) or contagious immunosuppressive disease (e.g. HIV). 10. History of diabetes. 11. Participation in any contact lens or lens care product clinical trial within 7 days prior to study enrollment.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Binocular Distance Visual Acuity (LogMAR) | 8-12 days post wear | Distance time controlled LogMAR Visual Acuity was carried out binocularly with high luminance and high contrast, at 4m under 250 cd/m\^2. The test was presented under the condition High luminance (250 cd/m\^2) High Contrast (90%) |
| Binocular Near Visual Acuity (logMAR) | 8-12 days post wear | Near time controlled LogMAR Visual Acuity was carried out binocularly using High lumiance and High Contrast, at 40cm under 250 cd/m\^2. The test was presented under the condition High Luminance (250cd/m\^2) High Contrast (90%). |
| Percentage of Eyes With Corneal Staining Grade 3 or Higher | 8-12 days post wear | Corneal staining was evaluated in 5 corneal regions (Central, Inferior, Nasal, Temporal and Superior) using Sodium Fluorescein strips. The Fluorescien strip was lightly placed on the subject's inferior palpebral conjunctiva. The corneal Staining was graded using the scale Grade 0: No Staining, Grade 1: Trace(Minimal superficial staining or stippling), Grade 2: Mild (Regional or diffuse punctate staining), Grade 3:Moderate(Significant dense coalesced staining, corneal abrasion or foreign body tracks.), Grade 4 Severe(Severe abrasions greater than 2 mm in diameter, ulcerations, epithelial loss, or full thickness abrasion.). The data was dichotomized into two group subjects with grade 3 or higher and those subjects with less than Grade 3 for the maximum grade of corneal staining across all 5 regions. |
| Percentage of Eyes With Limbal Conjunctival Redness Grade 3 or Higher | 8-12 days post wear | The Limbus refers to the 1 to 2mm wide zone of conjunctiva and underlying tissue adjacent to where the cornea joins the sclera. Limbal Conjuctival Redness was graded in 4 regions (Nasal, Temporal, Inferior and Superior) using the Efron Grading Scale in 1 unit increments. Grade 0: Normal, Grade 1: Trace, Grade 2: Mild, Grade 3: Moderate, Grade 4: Severe. The data was dichotomized into two group subjects with grade 3 or higher Limbal Conjuctival Redness, and those subjects with less than Grade 3 for the maximum grade of all 4 regions. |
| Percentage of Eyes With Bulbar Conjunctival Redness Grade 3 or Higher | 8-12 days post wear | Bulbar Conjunctival Injection was assessed in 4 regions (Nasal, Temporal, Inferior and Superior) using an Efron Grading scale by 1 unit increments. Grade 0: Normal, Grade 1: Trace, Grade 2: Mild, Grade 3: Moderate, Grade 4:Severe. The data was dichotomized into two group subjects with grade 3 or higher Conjunctival injection, and those subjects with less than Grade 3 for the maximum grade of all 4 regions. |
| CLUE Overall Quality of Vision Using the Contact Lens User Experience (CLUE)TM Questionnaire | 8-12 days post wear | CLUE Overall Quality of Vision is assessed using the Contact Lens User Experience (CLUE)TM questionnaire. CLUE is a validated patient-reported outcomes questionnaire to assess patient experience attributes of soft, disposable contact lenses (comfort, vision, handling, and packaging) in a contact-lens wearing population in the US, ages 18-65. Scores follow a normal distribution with a population average score of 60 (SD 20), where higher scores indicate a more favorable/positive response. 97% of the scores fall within 0 and 120 (mean +/-3XSD). |
Countries
United States
Participant flow
Pre-assignment details
This study enrolled a total of 298 subjects. Subjects were stratified as either Hyperopes or Myopes, which was determined by their sphere power. Of the enrolled subjects 22 did not meet the eligibility criteria and 276 subjects were randomized a study lens. Of the randomized subjects 29 were discontinued and 247 subjects completed the study.
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Etafilcon A/ Lotrafilcon B Subjects were randomly assigned to one of two possible lens sequences. Subjects first received the etafilcon A and then received the lotrafilcon B. | 139 |
| Lotrafilcon B/ Etafilcon A Subjects were randomly assigned to one of two possible lens sequences. Subjects first received the lotrafilcon B and then received the etafilcon A. | 137 |
| Total | 276 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 | FG001 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Period 1 | Adverse Event | 0 | 1 |
| Period 1 | Lens Power Not Available | 0 | 1 |
| Period 1 | No Longer Meets Eligibility criteria | 1 | 0 |
| Period 1 | Protocol Violation | 4 | 4 |
| Period 1 | Study Site office Closed | 0 | 1 |
| Period 1 | Test Article Not Available | 4 | 1 |
| Period 1 | Unsatisfactory Visual Response | 0 | 3 |
| Period 2 | Lens Discomfort | 1 | 0 |
| Period 2 | No longer meets Eligibility Criteria | 1 | 0 |
| Period 2 | Protocol Violation | 0 | 2 |
| Period 2 | Study Site office Closed | 1 | 1 |
| Period 2 | Unsatisfactory lens Fitting | 0 | 1 |
| Period 2 | Unsatisfactory Visual Response | 1 | 1 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Etafilcon A/ Lotrafilcon B | Lotrafilcon B/ Etafilcon A | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 50.49 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.626 | 50.90 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.775 | 50.69 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.691 |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized American Indian or Alaska Native | 2 participants | 0 participants | 2 participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Asian | 2 participants | 3 participants | 5 participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Black or African American | 13 participants | 10 participants | 23 participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Native Hawaiian or other Pacific Islander | 0 participants | 1 participants | 1 participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized other | 1 participants | 0 participants | 1 participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized White | 121 participants | 123 participants | 244 participants |
| Region of Enrollment United States | 139 participants | 137 participants | 276 participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 108 Participants | 108 Participants | 216 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 31 Participants | 29 Participants | 60 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | — / — | — / — |
| other Total, other adverse events | 0 / 276 | 0 / 276 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 0 / 276 | 0 / 276 |
Outcome results
Binocular Distance Visual Acuity (LogMAR)
Distance time controlled LogMAR Visual Acuity was carried out binocularly with high luminance and high contrast, at 4m under 250 cd/m\^2. The test was presented under the condition High luminance (250 cd/m\^2) High Contrast (90%)
Time frame: 8-12 days post wear
Population: The analysis population consists of subjects that completed all study visits without a major protocol deviation. The analysis was conducted on each lens and strata.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Etafilcon A | Binocular Distance Visual Acuity (LogMAR) | Hyperopes, N=91, 91 | -0.068 LogMAR | Standard Deviation 0.0885 |
| Etafilcon A | Binocular Distance Visual Acuity (LogMAR) | Myopes, N=116, N=116 | -0.109 LogMAR | Standard Deviation 0.0826 |
| Lotrafilcon B | Binocular Distance Visual Acuity (LogMAR) | Hyperopes, N=91, 91 | -0.058 LogMAR | Standard Deviation 0.0867 |
| Lotrafilcon B | Binocular Distance Visual Acuity (LogMAR) | Myopes, N=116, N=116 | -0.107 LogMAR | Standard Deviation 0.0835 |
Binocular Near Visual Acuity (logMAR)
Near time controlled LogMAR Visual Acuity was carried out binocularly using High lumiance and High Contrast, at 40cm under 250 cd/m\^2. The test was presented under the condition High Luminance (250cd/m\^2) High Contrast (90%).
Time frame: 8-12 days post wear
Population: The analysis population consists of subjects that completed all study visits without a major protocol deviation. The analysis was conducted on each lens and strata.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Etafilcon A | Binocular Near Visual Acuity (logMAR) | Hyperopes, N=91, N=91 | 0.063 LogMAR | Standard Deviation 0.107 |
| Etafilcon A | Binocular Near Visual Acuity (logMAR) | Myopes, N=116, N=116 | 0.048 LogMAR | Standard Deviation 0.1106 |
| Lotrafilcon B | Binocular Near Visual Acuity (logMAR) | Hyperopes, N=91, N=91 | 0.082 LogMAR | Standard Deviation 0.1316 |
| Lotrafilcon B | Binocular Near Visual Acuity (logMAR) | Myopes, N=116, N=116 | 0.043 LogMAR | Standard Deviation 0.0975 |
CLUE Overall Quality of Vision Using the Contact Lens User Experience (CLUE)TM Questionnaire
CLUE Overall Quality of Vision is assessed using the Contact Lens User Experience (CLUE)TM questionnaire. CLUE is a validated patient-reported outcomes questionnaire to assess patient experience attributes of soft, disposable contact lenses (comfort, vision, handling, and packaging) in a contact-lens wearing population in the US, ages 18-65. Scores follow a normal distribution with a population average score of 60 (SD 20), where higher scores indicate a more favorable/positive response. 97% of the scores fall within 0 and 120 (mean +/-3XSD).
Time frame: 8-12 days post wear
Population: The analysis consists of subjects that completed all study visits without a major protocol deviation. The analysis was conducted on each lens and strata.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Etafilcon A | CLUE Overall Quality of Vision Using the Contact Lens User Experience (CLUE)TM Questionnaire | Hyperopes, N=91, N=91 | 46.48 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 18.834 |
| Etafilcon A | CLUE Overall Quality of Vision Using the Contact Lens User Experience (CLUE)TM Questionnaire | Myopes, N=116, N=116 | 47.74 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 19.279 |
| Lotrafilcon B | CLUE Overall Quality of Vision Using the Contact Lens User Experience (CLUE)TM Questionnaire | Hyperopes, N=91, N=91 | 44.79 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 18.439 |
| Lotrafilcon B | CLUE Overall Quality of Vision Using the Contact Lens User Experience (CLUE)TM Questionnaire | Myopes, N=116, N=116 | 50.17 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 20.433 |
Percentage of Eyes With Bulbar Conjunctival Redness Grade 3 or Higher
Bulbar Conjunctival Injection was assessed in 4 regions (Nasal, Temporal, Inferior and Superior) using an Efron Grading scale by 1 unit increments. Grade 0: Normal, Grade 1: Trace, Grade 2: Mild, Grade 3: Moderate, Grade 4:Severe. The data was dichotomized into two group subjects with grade 3 or higher Conjunctival injection, and those subjects with less than Grade 3 for the maximum grade of all 4 regions.
Time frame: 8-12 days post wear
Population: The Analysis population consists of subjects that completed all study visits without a major protocol deviation. The analysis was conducted on subject eyes for each lens and strata.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Etafilcon A | Percentage of Eyes With Bulbar Conjunctival Redness Grade 3 or Higher | Hyperopes, N=182, N=182 | 0.0 Percentage of Subject Eyes |
| Etafilcon A | Percentage of Eyes With Bulbar Conjunctival Redness Grade 3 or Higher | Myopes, N=232, N=232 | 0.0 Percentage of Subject Eyes |
| Lotrafilcon B | Percentage of Eyes With Bulbar Conjunctival Redness Grade 3 or Higher | Hyperopes, N=182, N=182 | 0.0 Percentage of Subject Eyes |
| Lotrafilcon B | Percentage of Eyes With Bulbar Conjunctival Redness Grade 3 or Higher | Myopes, N=232, N=232 | 0.0 Percentage of Subject Eyes |
Percentage of Eyes With Corneal Staining Grade 3 or Higher
Corneal staining was evaluated in 5 corneal regions (Central, Inferior, Nasal, Temporal and Superior) using Sodium Fluorescein strips. The Fluorescien strip was lightly placed on the subject's inferior palpebral conjunctiva. The corneal Staining was graded using the scale Grade 0: No Staining, Grade 1: Trace(Minimal superficial staining or stippling), Grade 2: Mild (Regional or diffuse punctate staining), Grade 3:Moderate(Significant dense coalesced staining, corneal abrasion or foreign body tracks.), Grade 4 Severe(Severe abrasions greater than 2 mm in diameter, ulcerations, epithelial loss, or full thickness abrasion.). The data was dichotomized into two group subjects with grade 3 or higher and those subjects with less than Grade 3 for the maximum grade of corneal staining across all 5 regions.
Time frame: 8-12 days post wear
Population: The analysis population consists of subjects that completed all study visits without a major protocol deviation.The analysis was conducted on subject eyes for each lens and strata.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Etafilcon A | Percentage of Eyes With Corneal Staining Grade 3 or Higher | Hyperopes, N=182, N=182 | 0.0 Percentage of Subject Eyes |
| Etafilcon A | Percentage of Eyes With Corneal Staining Grade 3 or Higher | Myopes, N=232, N=232 | 0.0 Percentage of Subject Eyes |
| Lotrafilcon B | Percentage of Eyes With Corneal Staining Grade 3 or Higher | Hyperopes, N=182, N=182 | 0.0 Percentage of Subject Eyes |
| Lotrafilcon B | Percentage of Eyes With Corneal Staining Grade 3 or Higher | Myopes, N=232, N=232 | 0.0 Percentage of Subject Eyes |
Percentage of Eyes With Limbal Conjunctival Redness Grade 3 or Higher
The Limbus refers to the 1 to 2mm wide zone of conjunctiva and underlying tissue adjacent to where the cornea joins the sclera. Limbal Conjuctival Redness was graded in 4 regions (Nasal, Temporal, Inferior and Superior) using the Efron Grading Scale in 1 unit increments. Grade 0: Normal, Grade 1: Trace, Grade 2: Mild, Grade 3: Moderate, Grade 4: Severe. The data was dichotomized into two group subjects with grade 3 or higher Limbal Conjuctival Redness, and those subjects with less than Grade 3 for the maximum grade of all 4 regions.
Time frame: 8-12 days post wear
Population: The Analysis population consists of subjects that completed all study visits without a major protocol deviation. The analysis was conducted on subject eyes for each lens and strata.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Etafilcon A | Percentage of Eyes With Limbal Conjunctival Redness Grade 3 or Higher | Hyperopes, N=182, N=182 | 0.0 Percentage of Subject Eyes |
| Etafilcon A | Percentage of Eyes With Limbal Conjunctival Redness Grade 3 or Higher | Myopes, N=232, N=232 | 0.0 Percentage of Subject Eyes |
| Lotrafilcon B | Percentage of Eyes With Limbal Conjunctival Redness Grade 3 or Higher | Hyperopes, N=182, N=182 | 0.0 Percentage of Subject Eyes |
| Lotrafilcon B | Percentage of Eyes With Limbal Conjunctival Redness Grade 3 or Higher | Myopes, N=232, N=232 | 0.0 Percentage of Subject Eyes |