Skip to content

Evaluation of the Performance of Investigational Contact Lenses in a Presbyopic Population

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01763047
Enrollment
298
Registered
2013-01-08
Start date
2012-11-30
Completion date
2013-02-28
Last updated
2018-06-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Presbyopia

Brief summary

The objective of this study is to evaluate the performance of a novel multifocal lens system.

Interventions

DEVICEetafilcon A

To be worn in a daily wear modality for a minimum of 6 hours per day.

Lenses will be worn in a reuseable modality; cleaned and disinfected each night.

Sponsors

Johnson & Johnson Vision Care, Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
40 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

1. Subjects must read, understand, and sign the STATEMENT OF INFORMED CONSENT and receive a fully executed copy of the form. 2. Subjects must appear able and willing to adhere to the instructions set forth in the clinical protocol. 3. Subjects must be between 40 and 70 years of age. 4. Subjects' spherical equivalent distance refraction must be in the range of -3.75 to +3.75 in each eye. 5. Subjects' refractive cylinder must be less than or equal to 0.75D in each eye. 6. Subjects' ADD power must be in the range of +0.75 to +2.50D in each eye. 7. Subjects' must have the best corrected visual acuity of 20/20-3 or better in each eye. 8. Subjects' should own a wearable pair of spectacles. 9. Subjects' must be an adapted soft contact lens wearer in both eyes (i.e. worn lenses a minimum of 2 days per week for at least 8 hours per wear day, for 1 month or more duration). 10. Subjects' must respond positively to at least on symptom on the Presbyopis Symptoms Questionnaire or already be wearing a presbyopic contact lens correction (e.g. reading spectacles over contact lenses, multifocal or monovision contact lenses, etc.).

Exclusion criteria

1. Currently pregnant or lactating (subjects who become pregnant during the study will be discontinued). 2. Any ocular or systemic allergies or diseases that may interfere with contact lens wear. 3. Any systemic disease, autoimmune disease, or use of medication, which may interfere with contact lens wear. 4. Any previous intraocular surgery (e.g. radial keratotomy, PRK, LASIK, etc.) 5. Any grade 3 or greater slit lamp findings (e.g. edema, corneal neovascularization, corneal staining, tarsal abnormalities, conjunctival injection) which may contraindicate contact lens wear. 6. Any ocular infection. 7. Any corneal distortion resulting from previous hard or rigid gas permeable contact lens wear. 8. History of binocular vision abnormality or strabismus. 9. Any infectious disease (e.g. hepatitis, tuberculosis) or contagious immunosuppressive disease (e.g. HIV). 10. History of diabetes. 11. Participation in any contact lens or lens care product clinical trial within 7 days prior to study enrollment.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Binocular Distance Visual Acuity (LogMAR)8-12 days post wearDistance time controlled LogMAR Visual Acuity was carried out binocularly with high luminance and high contrast, at 4m under 250 cd/m\^2. The test was presented under the condition High luminance (250 cd/m\^2) High Contrast (90%)
Binocular Near Visual Acuity (logMAR)8-12 days post wearNear time controlled LogMAR Visual Acuity was carried out binocularly using High lumiance and High Contrast, at 40cm under 250 cd/m\^2. The test was presented under the condition High Luminance (250cd/m\^2) High Contrast (90%).
Percentage of Eyes With Corneal Staining Grade 3 or Higher8-12 days post wearCorneal staining was evaluated in 5 corneal regions (Central, Inferior, Nasal, Temporal and Superior) using Sodium Fluorescein strips. The Fluorescien strip was lightly placed on the subject's inferior palpebral conjunctiva. The corneal Staining was graded using the scale Grade 0: No Staining, Grade 1: Trace(Minimal superficial staining or stippling), Grade 2: Mild (Regional or diffuse punctate staining), Grade 3:Moderate(Significant dense coalesced staining, corneal abrasion or foreign body tracks.), Grade 4 Severe(Severe abrasions greater than 2 mm in diameter, ulcerations, epithelial loss, or full thickness abrasion.). The data was dichotomized into two group subjects with grade 3 or higher and those subjects with less than Grade 3 for the maximum grade of corneal staining across all 5 regions.
Percentage of Eyes With Limbal Conjunctival Redness Grade 3 or Higher8-12 days post wearThe Limbus refers to the 1 to 2mm wide zone of conjunctiva and underlying tissue adjacent to where the cornea joins the sclera. Limbal Conjuctival Redness was graded in 4 regions (Nasal, Temporal, Inferior and Superior) using the Efron Grading Scale in 1 unit increments. Grade 0: Normal, Grade 1: Trace, Grade 2: Mild, Grade 3: Moderate, Grade 4: Severe. The data was dichotomized into two group subjects with grade 3 or higher Limbal Conjuctival Redness, and those subjects with less than Grade 3 for the maximum grade of all 4 regions.
Percentage of Eyes With Bulbar Conjunctival Redness Grade 3 or Higher8-12 days post wearBulbar Conjunctival Injection was assessed in 4 regions (Nasal, Temporal, Inferior and Superior) using an Efron Grading scale by 1 unit increments. Grade 0: Normal, Grade 1: Trace, Grade 2: Mild, Grade 3: Moderate, Grade 4:Severe. The data was dichotomized into two group subjects with grade 3 or higher Conjunctival injection, and those subjects with less than Grade 3 for the maximum grade of all 4 regions.
CLUE Overall Quality of Vision Using the Contact Lens User Experience (CLUE)TM Questionnaire8-12 days post wearCLUE Overall Quality of Vision is assessed using the Contact Lens User Experience (CLUE)TM questionnaire. CLUE is a validated patient-reported outcomes questionnaire to assess patient experience attributes of soft, disposable contact lenses (comfort, vision, handling, and packaging) in a contact-lens wearing population in the US, ages 18-65. Scores follow a normal distribution with a population average score of 60 (SD 20), where higher scores indicate a more favorable/positive response. 97% of the scores fall within 0 and 120 (mean +/-3XSD).

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

This study enrolled a total of 298 subjects. Subjects were stratified as either Hyperopes or Myopes, which was determined by their sphere power. Of the enrolled subjects 22 did not meet the eligibility criteria and 276 subjects were randomized a study lens. Of the randomized subjects 29 were discontinued and 247 subjects completed the study.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Etafilcon A/ Lotrafilcon B
Subjects were randomly assigned to one of two possible lens sequences. Subjects first received the etafilcon A and then received the lotrafilcon B.
139
Lotrafilcon B/ Etafilcon A
Subjects were randomly assigned to one of two possible lens sequences. Subjects first received the lotrafilcon B and then received the etafilcon A.
137
Total276

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Period 1Adverse Event01
Period 1Lens Power Not Available01
Period 1No Longer Meets Eligibility criteria10
Period 1Protocol Violation44
Period 1Study Site office Closed01
Period 1Test Article Not Available41
Period 1Unsatisfactory Visual Response03
Period 2Lens Discomfort10
Period 2No longer meets Eligibility Criteria10
Period 2Protocol Violation02
Period 2Study Site office Closed11
Period 2Unsatisfactory lens Fitting01
Period 2Unsatisfactory Visual Response11

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicEtafilcon A/ Lotrafilcon BLotrafilcon B/ Etafilcon ATotal
Age, Continuous50.49 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.626
50.90 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.775
50.69 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.691
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
American Indian or Alaska Native
2 participants0 participants2 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
2 participants3 participants5 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black or African American
13 participants10 participants23 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Native Hawaiian or other Pacific Islander
0 participants1 participants1 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
other
1 participants0 participants1 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
121 participants123 participants244 participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
139 participants137 participants276 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
108 Participants108 Participants216 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
31 Participants29 Participants60 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 2760 / 276
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 2760 / 276

Outcome results

Primary

Binocular Distance Visual Acuity (LogMAR)

Distance time controlled LogMAR Visual Acuity was carried out binocularly with high luminance and high contrast, at 4m under 250 cd/m\^2. The test was presented under the condition High luminance (250 cd/m\^2) High Contrast (90%)

Time frame: 8-12 days post wear

Population: The analysis population consists of subjects that completed all study visits without a major protocol deviation. The analysis was conducted on each lens and strata.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Etafilcon ABinocular Distance Visual Acuity (LogMAR)Hyperopes, N=91, 91-0.068 LogMARStandard Deviation 0.0885
Etafilcon ABinocular Distance Visual Acuity (LogMAR)Myopes, N=116, N=116-0.109 LogMARStandard Deviation 0.0826
Lotrafilcon BBinocular Distance Visual Acuity (LogMAR)Hyperopes, N=91, 91-0.058 LogMARStandard Deviation 0.0867
Lotrafilcon BBinocular Distance Visual Acuity (LogMAR)Myopes, N=116, N=116-0.107 LogMARStandard Deviation 0.0835
Primary

Binocular Near Visual Acuity (logMAR)

Near time controlled LogMAR Visual Acuity was carried out binocularly using High lumiance and High Contrast, at 40cm under 250 cd/m\^2. The test was presented under the condition High Luminance (250cd/m\^2) High Contrast (90%).

Time frame: 8-12 days post wear

Population: The analysis population consists of subjects that completed all study visits without a major protocol deviation. The analysis was conducted on each lens and strata.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Etafilcon ABinocular Near Visual Acuity (logMAR)Hyperopes, N=91, N=910.063 LogMARStandard Deviation 0.107
Etafilcon ABinocular Near Visual Acuity (logMAR)Myopes, N=116, N=1160.048 LogMARStandard Deviation 0.1106
Lotrafilcon BBinocular Near Visual Acuity (logMAR)Hyperopes, N=91, N=910.082 LogMARStandard Deviation 0.1316
Lotrafilcon BBinocular Near Visual Acuity (logMAR)Myopes, N=116, N=1160.043 LogMARStandard Deviation 0.0975
Primary

CLUE Overall Quality of Vision Using the Contact Lens User Experience (CLUE)TM Questionnaire

CLUE Overall Quality of Vision is assessed using the Contact Lens User Experience (CLUE)TM questionnaire. CLUE is a validated patient-reported outcomes questionnaire to assess patient experience attributes of soft, disposable contact lenses (comfort, vision, handling, and packaging) in a contact-lens wearing population in the US, ages 18-65. Scores follow a normal distribution with a population average score of 60 (SD 20), where higher scores indicate a more favorable/positive response. 97% of the scores fall within 0 and 120 (mean +/-3XSD).

Time frame: 8-12 days post wear

Population: The analysis consists of subjects that completed all study visits without a major protocol deviation. The analysis was conducted on each lens and strata.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Etafilcon ACLUE Overall Quality of Vision Using the Contact Lens User Experience (CLUE)TM QuestionnaireHyperopes, N=91, N=9146.48 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.834
Etafilcon ACLUE Overall Quality of Vision Using the Contact Lens User Experience (CLUE)TM QuestionnaireMyopes, N=116, N=11647.74 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.279
Lotrafilcon BCLUE Overall Quality of Vision Using the Contact Lens User Experience (CLUE)TM QuestionnaireHyperopes, N=91, N=9144.79 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.439
Lotrafilcon BCLUE Overall Quality of Vision Using the Contact Lens User Experience (CLUE)TM QuestionnaireMyopes, N=116, N=11650.17 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.433
Primary

Percentage of Eyes With Bulbar Conjunctival Redness Grade 3 or Higher

Bulbar Conjunctival Injection was assessed in 4 regions (Nasal, Temporal, Inferior and Superior) using an Efron Grading scale by 1 unit increments. Grade 0: Normal, Grade 1: Trace, Grade 2: Mild, Grade 3: Moderate, Grade 4:Severe. The data was dichotomized into two group subjects with grade 3 or higher Conjunctival injection, and those subjects with less than Grade 3 for the maximum grade of all 4 regions.

Time frame: 8-12 days post wear

Population: The Analysis population consists of subjects that completed all study visits without a major protocol deviation. The analysis was conducted on subject eyes for each lens and strata.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Etafilcon APercentage of Eyes With Bulbar Conjunctival Redness Grade 3 or HigherHyperopes, N=182, N=1820.0 Percentage of Subject Eyes
Etafilcon APercentage of Eyes With Bulbar Conjunctival Redness Grade 3 or HigherMyopes, N=232, N=2320.0 Percentage of Subject Eyes
Lotrafilcon BPercentage of Eyes With Bulbar Conjunctival Redness Grade 3 or HigherHyperopes, N=182, N=1820.0 Percentage of Subject Eyes
Lotrafilcon BPercentage of Eyes With Bulbar Conjunctival Redness Grade 3 or HigherMyopes, N=232, N=2320.0 Percentage of Subject Eyes
Primary

Percentage of Eyes With Corneal Staining Grade 3 or Higher

Corneal staining was evaluated in 5 corneal regions (Central, Inferior, Nasal, Temporal and Superior) using Sodium Fluorescein strips. The Fluorescien strip was lightly placed on the subject's inferior palpebral conjunctiva. The corneal Staining was graded using the scale Grade 0: No Staining, Grade 1: Trace(Minimal superficial staining or stippling), Grade 2: Mild (Regional or diffuse punctate staining), Grade 3:Moderate(Significant dense coalesced staining, corneal abrasion or foreign body tracks.), Grade 4 Severe(Severe abrasions greater than 2 mm in diameter, ulcerations, epithelial loss, or full thickness abrasion.). The data was dichotomized into two group subjects with grade 3 or higher and those subjects with less than Grade 3 for the maximum grade of corneal staining across all 5 regions.

Time frame: 8-12 days post wear

Population: The analysis population consists of subjects that completed all study visits without a major protocol deviation.The analysis was conducted on subject eyes for each lens and strata.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Etafilcon APercentage of Eyes With Corneal Staining Grade 3 or HigherHyperopes, N=182, N=1820.0 Percentage of Subject Eyes
Etafilcon APercentage of Eyes With Corneal Staining Grade 3 or HigherMyopes, N=232, N=2320.0 Percentage of Subject Eyes
Lotrafilcon BPercentage of Eyes With Corneal Staining Grade 3 or HigherHyperopes, N=182, N=1820.0 Percentage of Subject Eyes
Lotrafilcon BPercentage of Eyes With Corneal Staining Grade 3 or HigherMyopes, N=232, N=2320.0 Percentage of Subject Eyes
Primary

Percentage of Eyes With Limbal Conjunctival Redness Grade 3 or Higher

The Limbus refers to the 1 to 2mm wide zone of conjunctiva and underlying tissue adjacent to where the cornea joins the sclera. Limbal Conjuctival Redness was graded in 4 regions (Nasal, Temporal, Inferior and Superior) using the Efron Grading Scale in 1 unit increments. Grade 0: Normal, Grade 1: Trace, Grade 2: Mild, Grade 3: Moderate, Grade 4: Severe. The data was dichotomized into two group subjects with grade 3 or higher Limbal Conjuctival Redness, and those subjects with less than Grade 3 for the maximum grade of all 4 regions.

Time frame: 8-12 days post wear

Population: The Analysis population consists of subjects that completed all study visits without a major protocol deviation. The analysis was conducted on subject eyes for each lens and strata.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Etafilcon APercentage of Eyes With Limbal Conjunctival Redness Grade 3 or HigherHyperopes, N=182, N=1820.0 Percentage of Subject Eyes
Etafilcon APercentage of Eyes With Limbal Conjunctival Redness Grade 3 or HigherMyopes, N=232, N=2320.0 Percentage of Subject Eyes
Lotrafilcon BPercentage of Eyes With Limbal Conjunctival Redness Grade 3 or HigherHyperopes, N=182, N=1820.0 Percentage of Subject Eyes
Lotrafilcon BPercentage of Eyes With Limbal Conjunctival Redness Grade 3 or HigherMyopes, N=232, N=2320.0 Percentage of Subject Eyes

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026