Pain, Surgery
Conditions
Keywords
nociception, analgesia, intraoperative monitoring
Brief summary
In our previous study, NCT01631695, we proposed and clinically evaluated the Medasense pain response index, PRI, in anesthetized patients undergoing surgery. Note: the name PRI has been changed to NoL (Nociception Level) Index. The PRI is based on a non-linear combination of several pain-related physiological parameters into a one unique index (0-100). In this study we aim to validate the performance of the PRI by: 1. investigating the patient's PRI response to surgical painful stimuli under different levels of analgesia: * Investigating patient's PRI response to surgical painful stimuli under two different levels of Remifentanil Target Control Infusion (TCI) rates. * Investigating patient's PRI response to standardized painful stimulus (Tetanic stimulus) with and without opioids. 2. investigating the effect of beta-blockers on PRI performance in patients taking chronic beta-blocker treatment. The study is based on recording and analyzing the subject's physiological signals, while recording painful events, medication dosing and different clinical signs.
Detailed description
Pain is an unpleasant sensation, ranging from slight discomfort to intense suffering. Since pain is a subjective phenomenon, it has frequently defied objective, quantitative measurements. Today, in order to measure pain, subjective uni-dimensional scales are used to quantify pain. One of the most common scale used to rate a patient's pain intensity is the Numeric Pain Scale (NPS), usually scored from 0 to 100. Hitherto, those scales are based on the subjective evaluation of pain by the patient. During anesthesia the patient cannot communicate and therefore the verbal or other report is impossible. As a consequence, due to misrepresentation of the existence or extent of pain, care providers may fail to estimate the correct measure of pain and give too much or too little medication, leading to possible complications and adverse reactions. A validated scoring system of subject's pain level, or as in the case of an anaesthetised patient, subject's nociception level, is therefore needed. In this study the investigators intend to test and analyze the performances of Medasense pain response index, PRI, by comparing it with other standard pain related indicators (Heart Rate (HR), Heart Rate Variability (HRV), Skin Conductance, etc) before and after painful stimuli at different levels of analgesia. In addition, in order to reduce the variability between stimuli, a standardized stimulus (Tetanic ,30 sec, 100Hz, 60mA) will be given to all patients after sleep induction and before intubation, with and without administration of Fentanyl and the values of the PRI during these stimuli will be investigated.
Interventions
OTHERchronic beta-blocker treatment
Patients from the chronic beta-blocker treatment group will not be randomized, and will all be allocated to the high opioid level group.
DRUGBase level of remifentanil effect side concentration: 2ng/ml
constant remifentanil level of 2ng/ml administered using Target Control Infusion pumps.
DRUGBase level of remifentanil effect side concentration: 4ng/ml
constant remifentanil level of 4ng/ml administered using Target Control Infusion pumps.
Sponsors
Medasense Biometrics Ltd
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SCREENING
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator)
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
* ASA physical status 1-3 * Elective surgery
Exclusion criteria
* Pregnancy or lactation * History of severe cardiac arrhythmias * Abuse of alcohol or illicit drugs * History of mental retardation, dementia, psychiatric disorders * Allergy to any of the drugs to be used during anesthesia and recovery
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Change in Medasense's non-invasive pain monitoring index in response to painful events | at time of surgery. 1 minute before and 1 minute after painful stimuli (for instance: intubation, skin incision, trocar insertion) | outcome measure will be assessed one minute before painful event, and will be compared to a measure taken during the painful event. Note: during data analysis it became aparent that these definitions cannot be met. For example: the time of various clinical stimuli cannot be identified within seconds. Also, there is no meaning to a measure taken during event. Therefore, to avoid including part of the stimulus in the pre stimulus window, we restricted analysis to the first 30 seconds of the designated 1 minute before the event (-30 to -60 seconds). Similarly, the post stimulus window start was defined 10 seconds after the event annotation and the post stimulus window enlarged to 80 seconds. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Change in all pain related physiological parameters (heart rate, heart rate variability, Plethysmograph amplitude, skin conductance, etc) in response to specific painful stimuli | at time of surgery. 1 minute before and 1 minute after painful stimuli (for instance: intubation, skin incision, trocar insertion) | Outcome measures will be assessed one minute before painful event, and will be compared to measures taken during the painful event. Note: same changes as in outcome 1 measure. |
| Change in Medasense index/pain related physiological parameters/subjective pain assessment in response to changes in the level of analgesic drugs | at time of surgery. 1 minute before and 5 minute after analgesics administration | Outcome measures will be assessed one minute before administration of analgesic drug, and will be compared to measures taken 5 minutes after. Note: after fentanyl administration - same change as in outcome 1 measure. |
Countries
Israel
Outcome results
None listed