Skip to content

LARGE Aneurysm Randomized Trial: Flow Diversion Versus Traditional Endovascular Coiling Therapy

LARGE Aneurysm Randomized Trial: Flow Diversion Versus Traditional Endovascular Coiling Therapy

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01762137
Acronym
LARGE
Enrollment
23
Registered
2013-01-07
Start date
2013-02-28
Completion date
2017-02-28
Last updated
2018-02-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Intracranial Aneurysm

Keywords

Aneurysm, Coiling, Flow Diversion

Brief summary

In this study, patients with large anterior circulation IAs with neck and fundus morphologies amenable to either traditional endovascular treatments using coils or reconstruction with the flow diversion will be randomly assigned to either treatment technique.

Detailed description

This is a prospective, randomized trial comparing the endovascular coiling (endovascular coiling) versus the flow diversion for large and giant aneurysm treatment. The endovascular coiling used in this study are FDA-approved and in common use at institutions in this country and across the world. The flow diversion devices are FDA-approved for anterior circulation aneurysms \>10 mm and are in common use at institutions in this country and across the world. Patients will be enrolled who meet the inclusion criteria and consent to participate. Patients will be randomly assigned by a central web-based system in a 1:1 manner to treatment with either endovascular coiling or flow diversion. Data on each patient will be collected at the time of enrollment and treatment, and at subsequent follow-up visits.

Interventions

Endovascular flow diverter placement

PROCEDURECoiling

Endovascular coil placement

Sponsors

Medical University of South Carolina
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
21 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Age 21 to 75 years, inclusive 2. Patient has a single target IA that: is located in the following regions of the internal carotid artery: 1. Paraophthalmic (including paraclinoid, ophthalmic and hypophyseal segments) 2. Cavernous 3. Petrous 3. has a parent vessel with diameter 2.5-5.0 mm 4. Wide neck aneurysm ≥4 mm. 5. Target IA has size (maximum fundus diameter) 10 mm 6. The operator feels that the aneurysm can be appropriately treated with traditional endovascular techniques (endovascular coil embolization with or without adjunctive devices or parent artery deconstruction) using endovascular coiling or flow diversion devices. 7. Modified Rankin Scale 0-3 8. Signed and dated informed consent 4.2

Exclusion criteria

1. More than one IA requiring treatment in the next 6 months 2. Subarachnoid hemorrhage in the past 60 days 3. Any intracranial hemorrhage in the last 42 days 4. Major surgery (requiring general anesthesia) in the last 42 days 5. Coils in place in the target IA 6. Unstable neurologic deficit (i.e., any rapidly worsening clinical condition in the last 30 days (defined by a change in mRS of 2 or more)) 7. Known irreversible bleeding disorder 8. Platelet count \< 100 x 103 cells/mm3 or known platelet dysfunction 9. Clinically documented evidence in medical history of adverse reaction or contraindication to medications used in treatment of the aneurysm (i.e. Plavix, heparin, aspirin) 10. Prior stent placement at target site 11. Documented history of dementia 12. Contraindication to CT scan and MRI (ie. contrast allergy, or other condition that prohibits imaging from either CT or MRI) 13. Known allergy to contrast used in angiography that cannot be medically controlled 14. Known severe allergy to platinum or cobalt/chromium alloys 15. Relative contraindication to angiography (e.g., serum creatinine \> 2.5 mg/dL) 16. Pregnancy, breast-feeding, or positive pregnancy test \[either serum or urine\] (Woman of child-bearing potential must have a negative pregnancy test prior to the study procedure.) 17. Evidence of active infection (indicated by fever \[at or over 99.9 °F\] and/or open draining wound) at the time of randomization 18. Other known conditions of the heart, blood, brain or intracranial vessels that carry a high risk of neurologic events (e.g., severe heart failure, atrial fibrillation, known carotid stenosis) 19. Current use of cocaine or other illicit substance 20. Any comorbid disease or condition expected to compromise survival or ability to complete Follow-up assessments through 180 days 21. Extracranial stenosis greater than 50% in the carotid artery 22. Intracranial stenosis greater than 50% in the treated vessel 23. Based on investigator's judgment, patient does not have the necessary mental capacity to participate or is unwilling or unable to comply with protocol follow up appointment schedule. 24. Previously randomized into this trial or currently participating in another trial where the data is intended to be used to obtain marketing approval or to broaden an indication, without the approval of the study principal investigator, that may confound the results of this study. A screen failure log of all cases referred or presented for possible inclusion, but who were not randomized, and the reason(s) for exclusion will be maintained.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The primary aim of aneurysm treatment is to achieve occlusion of the IA without morbidity or mortality.approaximately 180 days after aneurysm treatement procedureGreater than 90% angiographic occlusion AND stable (or decreased) aneurysm size on cross sectional imaging (CT or MR) at 180 days post procedure. The primary objective is to show that flow diversion is non-inferior to endovascular coiling with respect to a combined efficacy and safety endpoint.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Subgroup analysis of clinical and angiographic outcomes in aneurysms 10-20 mm and > 2 cm.approximately 3 years after aneurysm treatment procedureA comparison will be made as a subgroup analysis of clinical and angiographic outcomes in aneurysms 10-20 mm and \> 2 cm. will be measured based on efficacy (Greater than 90% angiographic occlusion AND stable (or decreased) aneurysm size on cross sectional imaging (CT or MR) at 180 days post procedure) and Safety (Free of any major neurologic event (defined as change in NIHSS from baseline \> 4 points) downstream from target aneurysm, or death at 180 days post procedure) within this subgroup of study patients.
Downstream flow related ischemic stroke, parenchymal hemorrhage, subarachnoid hemorrhage, aneurysm rupture or re-treatment of index aneurysm rates at 180 days, one year and 3 years.approaximately 180 days, 1 year, and 3 years after aneurysm treatement procedureA count of occurrences of downstream flow related ischemic stroke, parenchymal hemorrhage, subarachnoid hemorrhage, aneurysm rupture or re-treatment of index aneurysm rates at 180 days, one year and 3 years. will be measured and compared at each time point: 180 days, 1 year, and 3 year between groups
Change in clinical functional outcome at 180 days, 1 year and 3 years post-endovascular treatment procedure, as measured by an increase in the modified Rankin Scale from baseline.180 days, 1 year and 3 years post-endovascular treatment procedureA comparison between groups will be conducted of change in modified rankin scale. The comparison will be measured by an increase in the modified Rankin Scale from baseline, change in clinical functional outcome at 180 days, 1 year and 3 years post-endovascular treatment procedure, as measured by an increase in the modified Rankin Scale from baseline.
Incidence of worsening of baseline neurological signs/symptoms as measured by NIHSS/ophthalmologist exam related to target intracranial aneurysm (IA) at 180 days.180 daysA count and comparison of the incidence of worsening of baseline neurologic signs/symptoms as measured by national institutes of health stroke scale (NIHSS) or ophthalmological exam related to target IA at 180 days will be made between groups.
Number of inpatient hospital (and re-hospitalized) days (subgrouped >7 days) at 180 days, 1 year and 3 years.180 days, 1 year and 3 years.A count and comparison of the number of inpatient hospital (and re-hospitalized) days (subgrouped \>7 days) at 180 days, 1 year and 3 years will be performed between groups
Incidence of device or procedure related adverse events at 180 days, 1 year and 3 years.approximately 90 days, 180 days, 1 year, 2 year and 3 yeara count of the occurrences of device related Adverse Events will be recorded and compared between randomized groups at 90, 180, 1year, 2 year, and 3 year time points.
Device cost of therapy at treatment and any subsequent retreatment.approximately 6 years after the initial procedureDevice cost of therapy at treatment and any subsequent retreatment will be counted and compared between groups in the study.
Procedure time, as measured as the time from placement of the treating guide catheter for purposes of aneurysm treatment until guide catheter removal.approximately 6 years after the initial procedureProcedure time, as measured as the time from placement of the treating guide catheter for purposes of aneurysm treatment until guide catheter removal, will be collected, measured and compared between groups in the study.
Subgroup analysis of clinical and angiographic outcomes in aneurysms intradural vs. extradural locationapproximately 3 years after aneurysm treatment procedureA comparison will be made as a subgroup analysis of clinical and angiographic outcomes in aneurysms of intradural vs. extradural location and will be measured based on efficacy (Greater than 90% angiographic occlusion AND stable (or decreased) aneurysm size on cross sectional imaging (CT or MR) at 180 days post procedure) and Safety (Free of any major neurologic event (defined as change in NIHSS from baseline \> 4 points) downstream from target aneurysm, or death at 180 days post procedure) within this subgroup of study patients.
Subgroup analysis of clinical and angiographic outcomes in aneurysms reconstructive vs. deconstructive technique.approximately 3 years after aneurysm treatment procedureA comparison will be made as a subgroup analysis of clinical and angiographic outcomes in aneurysms treated with reconstructive vs. deconstructive technique and will be measured based on efficacy (Greater than 90% angiographic occlusion AND stable (or decreased) aneurysm size on cross sectional imaging (CT or MR) at 180 days post procedure) and Safety (Free of any major neurologic event (defined as change in NIHSS from baseline \> 4 points) downstream from target aneurysm, or death at 180 days post procedure) within this subgroup of study patients.
Packing density as measured by volumetric filling of the aneurysm if aneurysm is coiled.after initial procedure, day 0An analysis of packing density as measured by volumetric filling of the aneurysm if aneurysm is coiled will be performed. The analysis will show within group relationships and possible correlations among coiled patients and other variables.

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026