Skip to content

Effect Study of Montelukast to Treat Asthma Detected by LTD4 Bronchial Effect Study of Montelukast to Treat Asthma Detected by LTD4 Bronchial Provocation Test

Effect of Montelukast on Leukotriene Sensitive Asthma Detected by LTD4 Bronchial Provocation Test

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01759472
Enrollment
60
Registered
2013-01-03
Start date
2012-09-30
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2013-01-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Bronchial Asthma

Keywords

leukotriene, leukotriene receptor antagonist

Brief summary

To determine whether LTD4-BPT could be an effective indicator for predicting efficacy of anti-leukotriene therapy, allowing objective proofs for the use of LTRA among asthmatics in a specific sensitive to leukotriene population of asthma. Hypothesis :Monteluakst can better improve pre-challenge FEV1 from baseline in leukotriene-sensitive group than leukotriene-insensitive group.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Guangzhou Institute of Respiratory Disease
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
CASE_CONTROL
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
15 Years to 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Aged 15-60 years, male or female. 2. Mild to moderate persistent asthma. 3. Mini AQLQ score ≤6 or ACQ score ≥1. 4. Giving written informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

1. Current smoker or quitted smoking ≤12 months. 2. Significant allergen exposure. 3. Respiratory tract infection within 2 weeks before or during the study. 4. Cardiovascular disease. 5. History of malignant disease within the preceding 5 years. 6. And/or concomitant pulmonary disease. 7. Pregnant or breast-feed period. 8. Use of leukotrienes receptor antagonist within 5 days

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
whether there was improvement in pre-challenge FEV1%from commencement of LTRA therapy to (7±2) days and (56±5) daysThe primary outcome was a qualitative measure, with the results being expressed as either yes or no ('1' or '0' in Logistic model).A higher FEV1% is more suggestive of instability of asthma control.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
whether there was improvement in post- treatment FENOfrom commencement of LTRA therapy to (7±2) days and (56±5) daysIn Logistic regression model, whether there was improvement shown in post-treatment FENO as compared with pre-treatment level was expressed as either 'yes' or 'no', with symbols of '1' or '0'. Thus the measure was qualitative one. FENO represented fractional exhaled nitric oxide above.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
whether there was improvement in post- treatment ACT scorefrom commencement of LTRA therapy to (56±5) daysIn Logistic regression model, whether there was improvement shown in post-treatment ACT score as compared with pre-treatment level was expressed as either 'yes' or 'no', with symbols of '1' or '0'. Thus the measure above was qualitative. The total score of ACT was 25, with 5 questions in all. Higher score was indicative of better asthma control.
whether there was a gradual decrease in weekly use of salbutamolfrom commencement of LTRA therapy to (56±5) daysIn Logistic regression model, whether there was a gradual decrease in weekly use of salbutamol as compared with pre-treatment level was expressed as either 'yes' or 'no', with symbols of '1' or '0'. Thus the measure was qualitative one.
whether there was improvement in post- treatment PD20FEV1-MCHfrom commencement of LTRA therapy to (7±2) days and (56±5) daysIn Logistic regression model, whether there was improvement shown in post-treatment PD20FEV1-MCH as compared with pre-treatment level was expressed as either 'yes' or 'no', with symbols of '1' or '0'. Thus the measure above was qualitative. PD20FEV1-MCh referred to as the provocative dosage causing a 20% fall in FEV1 while using methacholine as a bronchoprovocant.
whether there was improvement in post- treatment PD20FEV1-LTD4from commencement of LTRA therapy to (7±2) days and (56±5) daysIn Logistic regression model, whether there was improvement shown in post-treatment PD20FEV1-LTD4 as compared with pre-treatment level was expressed as either 'yes' or 'no', with symbols of '1' or '0'. Thus the measure above was qualitative. PD20FEV1-LTD4 referred to as the provocative dosage causing a 20% fall in FEV1 while using Leukotriene D4 as a bronchoprovocant.
improvement in weekly and monthly PEFRfrom commencement of LTRA therapy to (56±5) daysThe primary outcome was a qualitative measure, with the results being expressed as either yes or no ('1' or '0' in Logistic model).PEFR was defined as the changed rate of peak expiratory flow, which was calculated using the formula according to maximal PEF (PEFmax) and minimal PEF (PEFmin) measured by portable PEF monitor: 100%\*(PEFmax-PEFmin)/\[(PEFmax+PEFmin)\*1/2\]. A higher PEFR is more suggestive of instability of asthma control.
whether there was improvement in post- treatment AQLQ symptom scorefrom commencement of LTRA therapy to (7±2) days and (56±5) daysIn Logistic regression model, whether there was improvement shown in post-treatment AQLQ symptom score as compared with pre-treatment level was expressed as either 'yes' or 'no', with symbols of '1' or '0'. Thus the measure above was qualitative. Items with regard to asthma symptoms were extracted from the whole AQLQ score, with the total score of 84. Higher score represented better asthma control.

Countries

China

Contacts

Primary ContactShi Xu, doctor
shixu1003@163.com+8618026250151

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026